The Attica Tollway Operations Authority KPI performance measurement

Similar documents
Road tolls to pay for the Metro construction in Athens possible way towards free public transport

44 TH ASECAP STUDY & INFORMATION DAYS 2016

Keeping up with the KPIs 10 steps to help identify and monitor key performance indicators for your business

Digital Marketing Specialist

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) :

Developing Effective Metrics for Supply Management

Road Condition Weather Information Systems Automatically Feeds Travellers Road Information Portal at the Ministry of Transportation, Ontario

Performance Measures for RIDOT s Traffic Management Center

Risk Management How to manage your brand & build business resilience to improve your bottom line

Bedford s Network Management Strategy ( ) November 2010

Big Data for the Airport How can it Contribute to an Enhanced Travel Experience?

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 4 Focus with Employee Survey Update. February 2016 San Francisco, California

Asset Management and Industry Solutions - A Municipal Perspective

Royal Insurance Corporation of Bhutan Performance Management System (PMS) User Manual

The Key Performance Indicator Evaluation Process (KPI Process)

Seoul Metro line 9 O&M Contract

The following is intended to outline our general product direction. It is intended for informational purposes only, and may not be incorporated into

Module 7 Study Guide

How To Manage Assets

your people are our business Performance Management

CALL CENTER ESSENTIALS

Understanding the Business Value of Social Solutions in Sales

Relevant COSO Principles. Policies and procedures are maintained. Policies and Procedures. Roles and responsibilities are identified

All reports 1. Governance Service receive draft report Name of GSO Maria Lugangira. Name of SPO. Date

ISO 9001:2015 vs. ISO 9001:2008

Fleet Tracking we ve got it covered

Performance Management Readiness Survey

California PATH, University of California at Berkeley, Building 452, Richmond Field Station 1357 South 46 th Street, Richmond, CA 94804

Tenant Satisfaction Survey 2012 Action Plan October 2012

Stakeholder Analysis. Theory. Kerry Malone, Senior Advisor

Guidelines for Virtual Transportation Management Center Development. National Rural ITS Meeting August 27, 2014

How To Manage Traffic In Berlin

The New Mobility: Using Big Data to Get Around Simply and Sustainably

Xerox Transportation: Policy adaptive ITS services

Global Account Management for Sales Organization in Multinational Companies *

Road Asset Management

Asset Management Policy for Major PFI Projects

How To Use Icem

Fleet Tracking we ve got it covered

Marketing Management. 1 Many people are surprised when they realize how may different ideas and activities are included in the term.

Defining Contract Management


Report to: Trust Board Agenda item: 13 Date of Meeting: 25 April 2012

Exploit Geospatial Technology, Big Data and Analytics for Urban Planning. Peter Quek, CIO Urban Redevelopment Authority Singapore June 2014

STANDARDIZED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE STATE AND CONDITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN EDMONTON

Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Appraisal System Training

7. Key performance indicators (KPIs)

Building Business Case for the Enterprise From Vision to Outcomes IIBA Boston Sept. 20, 2012 Joseph Raynus ShareDynamics, Inc.

Financing PPPs: Project Finance June 2006

Lean and Six Sigma Healthcare Fad or Reality. Vince D Mello President

PMP/CAPM Prep course. Anwers to all questions with rationale

Customer Engagement Strategy 2015/ /18

Integrated Performance & Risk Management -

Key Performance Indicators in Railways- Who measures what?

StrategyDriven.com. Organizational Performance Measures. Types. Business Execution Series...

Accountability Model for Cloud Governance

Fares Policy In London: Impact on Bus Patronage

SF Bay Area Transportation Management Systems: An Innovative DOT and MPO Partnership

Project Management Best Practice Benchmarks

Measuring Contractors Performance Using KPIs GUIDANCE NOTES FOR FACILITIES MANAGERS

Incremental Changes and Disruptive Impacts in Tolling. By Philip Miller, P.E., AECOM

Performance Management. Date: November 2012

Digital Marketing Specialist

Toll ring around Oslo: How car owners help paying for improved mobility, and better environment too

Data Analytics and Reporting in Toll Management and Supervision System Case study Bosnia and Herzegovina

Car Park Management Plan SouthGate, Bath SouthGate Limited Partnership

Touch the difference PARKING SYSTEMS TICKETING ACCESS CONTROL

Qualification Snapshot CIH Level 4 Certificate in Managing Responsive Repairs (QCF)

PPP seminar. High Level Regional Workshop on PPPs in the Middle East Jordan. June 2010

Contents. Management Policy Manual SEM USA Page 2 of 12

Glossary. means the asset valuation module of Municipal DataWorks. means Geographic Information System

Tailoring transport choices

How To Manage Asset Management

Toll Collection Systems

4.4 ECOCITY Tampere - Vuores

14620 Henry Road Houston, Texas PH: FX: WEB: QUALITY MANUAL

Transcription:

The Attica Tollway Operations Authority KPI performance measurement Dimitris Mandalozis Strategic & Organizational Manager Attikes Diadromes S.A. Co-authors: Bill Halkias, H. Tyrogianni and A. Politou

The public generally objects paying tolls Objection by the public to the implementation of a toll regime is a major risk for all toll road projects. In the case of DBFO projects this objection may affect significantly the project revenues. Financing becomes very difficult

The Public Opposition Experience

Q: Are there any approaches available to mitigate the risk of objecting paying tolls? The answer in our case: Offer to the users services that are worth their money. Provide High Level of Service.

What is Level of Service? Level of Service (LoS) determines the effectiveness (quality) of transportation.

For the USERS in an urban environment Mobility, Safety and Convenience are key factors for the everyday life of those users.

High Level of Service (LoS) High LoS in every modern Tollway is ensured by the development & application of an integrated monitoring / measuring system of Operators performance.

KPI Advantages Efficiency Attention to the actions and resources Improvement Improves efficiency of the system KPI Effectiveness Correlates the outcome of policies to the actions Communication Communicates useful information

KPI Characteristics Sensible Possible to be measured, by a predefined and scientific based method. Data must be available on time. Truly representative of the quantities & characteristics that they are intended to represent, as well as to provide useful information for the decision makers. Measurable

KPI Characteristics Verifiable Linked into systems that allow feedback of information into the decision-making process. Be possible to check that the values of the data or indicators presented are reported accurately. Interlinked

Attica Tollway Project

Attica Tollway Athens, Greece TB OMC TB OMC: Operation and Maintenance Center TB: Technical Base

The facts 65 km Urban Motorway A major Concession Project, developed in stages AADT (2009):307,300 toll transactions Number of Toll Stations 39 Number of Toll Lanes 195 Lanes Capacity Total Lanes Toll Collectors 300 vehicles/hour 140 e-pass 800 vehicles/hour 55

Towards LoS and Business Excellence Identify the need: A mechanism protecting value of money for users Set the target: Innovative services and beyond any competition for Greece Design & Implement services: Procedures-manuals, Evaluate the services: Mystery Shopping, Surveys

What Services are evaluated in attica Tollway? Safety of users Incident Management Maintenance ETC Performance / Penetration Overall Customer Satisfaction

LoS Considerations on Attica Tollway Interference by a dense and congested urban road network Flat & Open Toll Regime (current toll 2,70 ) makes users to be even more demanding Traffic volumes much higher than expected, especially in the central section

Time Savings is the Key to Use of the Road 80 70 Time savings as stated by users (%) 60 55,2 50 40 30 20 15,1 13,8 12,9 10 0 Less than 15 minutes Between 16 and 30 min Between 31 and 45 min Between 46 and 60 min More than 60 min 3,0

Implementation of KPI s Strategy definition at the Operational level Discrete set of Indicators for each operational activity Target Values for each indicator Time based Indicators Evaluation Problem recognition and corrective actions

Attica Tollway KPI Strategic Map Level ΙΙΙ: Output Concession Company Shareholders Users Stakeholders Road Maintenance Traffic Tolls Level ΙΙ: Productive Commercial Policy Customer Support Financial Purchasing HR IT LevelΙ: Administrative Building Availability Legal ONLY 2 KPIS ARE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION

Indicative Tolls KPI of Attica Tollway Toll lane processing capacity Toll collection cash discrepancy Counterfeit or worn banknotes /coins Non Payment Form (NPF) ETC volume

Indicative Traffic and Maintenance KPIs Response time to incidents indicators Lane closure due to road maintenance indicator Incident handling indicators Congestion indicators Users safety indicators Attica Tollway KPI

Presentation of an Indicator Month Km x Hours

HR KPI of Attica Tollway Employees turnover indicators Employees satisfaction indicator Employees presence indicator Training indicators

Attica Tollway KPI Values

Attica Tollway KPI Values

Typical Indicator s measurement Report of Attica Tollway

What do customers think? Let s demonstrate public s opinion

Demonstrable Results Increase of ETC use, from 36% in 2005 to 50% in 2010 Subscribers' increase, from 143,000 distributed transponders in 2005 to 389,000 in 2010, The customers satisfaction remained at a very high level despite the high increase of traffic Increase of the operating procedures from 15 to 47

Customer Satisfaction: Feeling safe while driving on Attica Tollway (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 40,9 45,4 54,0 47,3 Mar-08 Mar-09 92.7% of the users state that they are very & rather satisfied vs. 94.9% in 2008 20 10 0 5,7 3,9 1,2 0,7 0,1 0,9 Very safe Rather safe Not so safe Not at all No opinion

Customer Satisfaction: Evaluation of patrolling levels (%) 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 0 70 80 90 100 Very satisfied 70,3 69,8 Rather satisfied 19,0 22,1 Not so satisfied 2,6 2,5 91,9% of the users state that they are very & rather satisfied vs. 89.3% in 2008 Not satisfied at all Do not know/do not have any opinion 2,7 3,0 5,3 2,5 Mar-08 Mar-09

Customer Satisfaction: Evaluation of Toll Collectors (%) Very Satisifed 90,3 88,4 Satisfied 8,7 9,0 Not so much satisfied Not at all 0,5 0,8 0,2 0,6 97,4% of the users state that are satisfied from the toll collectos Mar 08 Mar 09 N/A 0,3 1,2

Customer Satisfaction: Evaluation of Call Center Services(%) 0 20 40 60 80 100 Very satified 63,9 62,4 Satisfied Not so much 1,6 4,3 31,0 28,7 91,1% of the users state that they are satisfied from the call center services Not at all 0,8 3,3 Mar 08 N/A 4,1 Mar 09

Positive opinion towards public campaigns [%- multiple responses] 0 1 0 2 0 30 40 5 0 6 0 70 80 9 0 10 0 Seminars to scholl pupils for Rad Safety Issues 70,5 78,2 First Aid Information & 46,8 Seminars 54,5 Guidelines for safe driving on the motorway 41,8 46,7 Guidelines for safe driving 32,8 46,4 Information for car maintenance 24,3 33,4 Mar-08 Mar-09 None from the above 5,4 4,5

Honors and Achievements Décibel d Or Mng &Reduction of Noise, 2003 -CNB 1 st Prize European Road Safety Award, 2005 -IRF Global Road Achievement Award Environmental Mitigation, 2008-IRF 1st prize for innovating development in GIS applications 2008-ERSI

Industry Recognition 2009 IBTTA TOLL EXCELLENCE AWARD in the category of administration for our project Monitoring the Success.

Conclusions By providing high LoS, Attica Tollway succeeded to change the initial negative behavior of users towards paying tolls Provision of services to users above and beyond contractual obligations, is not a waste of money Credible, verifiable and sophisticated monitoring systems evaluating services is recommended Best Practice Mystery shopping is not an I got you tool but it generates peace of mind

Thank you! Contact: Dimitris Mandalozis Strategic & Organizational Manager Attica Tollway Operations Authority Attikes Diadromes S.A. e-mail: dmandalo@attikesdiadromes.gr