If You Think Investing is Gambling, You re Doing it Wrong!

Similar documents
HIGH-RISK STOCK TRADING: INVESTMENT OR GAMBLING?

Internet Gambling in Canada: Prevalence, Patterns and Land-Based Comparisons

Executive summary. Participation in gambling activities (Chapter 2)

University of Saskatchewan Survey

APPLICATION FOR Page 1/7 RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Newfoundland and Labrador Gambling Prevalence Study. June 2009

2007 ADULT GAMBLING PREVALENCE STUDY

A Survey of Gambling in Delaware. Walter Mateja, Robert Wilson, and Betty Ableman

Can I hold a race night, casino night or poker night? Click here for printer-friendly version

2014 New Brunswick Gambling Prevalence Study. Department of Health and Department of Finance

New Zealanders Participation in Gambling

Internet gambling : An online empirical study among student gamblers. Professor Mark Griffiths Andrew Barnes

NAPCS Product List for NAICS 7132: Gambling Industries

From slot machines to gaming terminals experiences with regulatory changes in Norway Vienna September 2010

Norway: The slot machine and problem gambling

Canadian Gambling Digest

2014 BRITISH COLUMBIA PROBLEM GAMBLING PREVALENCE STUDY. Gaming Policy and Enforcement Branch. B.C. Ministry of Finance FINAL REPORT.

Briefing for the Presentation to the DSD Committee, 19 January Represented by:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATE: September 28, 2005 CONTACT: Dan Romer, ; (cell)

Standard 12: The student will explain and evaluate the financial impact and consequences of gambling.

GAMBLING POLICY FRAMEWORK

Gambling participation: activities and mode of access

Appendix 1. Local Area Profile. Gambling Premises: Hotspots of Recorded Crime, Vulnerable People and Vulnerable Places

Heather Wardle a e, Alison Moody a, Mark Griffiths b, Jim Orford c & Rachel Volberg d a National Centre for Social Research, London, UK

Gambling participation: activities and mode of access

Article. Gambling by Katherine Marshall. Component of Statistics Canada Catalogue no X Perspectives on Labour and Income

Problem Gambling in New Zealand. Preliminary findings from the New Zealand Health Survey (July 2011 to March 2012)

Problem Gambling Assessment Instruments & Screens

BINGO anwer bookletapl13 4/13/05 11:27 AM Page 1 BINGO. Game Answers

An examination of participation in online gambling activities and the relationship with problem gambling

Manitobans and Gambling III

Gambling and Problem Gambling Prevalence Among College Students in Florida July 2008

Gambling in Tower Hamlets- 2016

Gambling Commission. Trends in Gambling Behaviour

Bookmaker Bookmaker Online Bookmaker Offline

Problem Gambling. Over the last decade, legalized gambling in Canada has grown - rapidly! So has problem gambling!

August 31, 2005 Phone: (303) / (303) DENVER Colorado Attorney General John Suthers and Colorado Limited Gaming Control

Examining machine gambling in the British Gambling Prevalence Survey

(septembre 2009) 30 %

This is A socio-cultural examination of gambling as an element of students lives and collegiate activity

ADOLESCENT GAMBLING ON THE INTERNET: A REVIEW

Is online gambling on state regulated websites safer? An analysis of the first national survey on online gambling

Gambling Attitudes and Behaviors: A 2011 Survey of Adult Iowans

Experian Hitwise The Online Gambling Landscape October 2010

GAMBLING ADDICTIONS ON THE INTERNET

Gambling participation: activities and mode of access

REPORT OF SURVEY ON PARTICIPATION IN GAMBLING ACTIVITIES AMONG SINGAPORE RESIDENTS, 2014

Prevalence of Gambling and Problem Gambling in New South Wales

Kentucky Needs Assessment Project Brief Report. IV Drug Use among Kentucky Adults

Near Misses in Bingo

International Conference Gambling in the Czech Republic and its New Regulatory Framework. Gambling Risks

IS IT A SIN TO GAMBLE? Colossians 3:1-7

Published in 2003 by High Stakes Publishing, 21 Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JB Copyright Joseph Buchdahl

IS LEGALISED ONLINE GAMING IN NORTH AMERICA INEVITABLE AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE

Gambling Behavior among High School Students in the State of Connecticut

Advice on non-commercial and private gaming and betting

Executive Summary. 1. What is the temporal relationship between problem gambling and other co-occurring disorders?

Code of Practice. September 2012 Version 4. Queensland Responsible Gambling. Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation

Isle of Man Gambling Prevalence Survey 2012

Gaming Trends: Internet and Cell Phones

Nature and scope of illegal games of chance in the Netherlands G.H.J. Homburg MSc and E. Oranje MSc July 2009

GAMBLING BEHAVIOUR IN BRITAIN: Results from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey. Kerry Sproston, Bob Erens, Jim Orford

Changes in machine gambling behaviour

What risks do simulated gambling activities pose to young people?

The Regulation of Online Gaming Across Jurisdictions: Success, Standards and Stability

Gambling and Problem Gambling in Mississippi

IVTs and tools for responsible gambling

Gambling games. Lesson 6

Finding Supporters. Political Predictive Analytics Using Logistic Regression. Multivariate Solutions

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee. Gambling Policy Fixed Odds Betting Terminals

Transcription:

If You Think Investing is Gambling, You re Doing it Wrong! Warren Buffet Jennifer Arthur, M.Sc. PhD Candidate, University of Adelaide Supervisor: Dr. Paul Delfabbro 10th European Conference on Gambling Studies and Policy Issues

Investing versus Gambling Investing has economic utility; gambling does not. Investing has positive expected returns; gambling has negative. Gambling can be addictive and destructive, investing is healthy. Investors are risk-averse; gamblers are risk-seekers. Investing is long-term process; gambling focuses on immediate outcomes. Investing is based on skill and knowledge; whereas gambling is based on luck and emotions.

Media On Wall Street, Gambling is Called Innovation and Clients are Called Idiots Jon Stewart

'We lost everything gambling on shares' As do-it-yourself investing goes mainstream, one couple lost their life savings by using a tool meant for professionals Gianpaolo Prinzi and Fernanda Freitas invested in shares for their retirement, but lost 180,000 in doing so

Public Perception % of North American Adults Indicating whether they consider the Activity to be 'Gambling' (n = 12,843) Purchasing Insurance Starting a Business Buying Raffle or Fundraising Tickets Taking Emotional or Physical Risks Games vs Other People for no $ Buying "Blue Chip" Stocks Playing Games vs. Other People for $ Spending $ on Games at Fairs for Prizes Betting on Sports Buying High-risk Stocks Paying to Enter Tournament with Cash Prizes Horse/Dog Race Betting Casino Table Games for Money Buying Lottery Tickets Bingo for Money Playing EGMs (slots, video lottery terminals) Buying Instant Win Tickets 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Reproduced with permission from Williams, Stevens, &Nixon (2011)

Formal Definitions Investing putting money into an asset with the expectation of capital appreciation, dividends, and/or interest earning. This may or may not involve research. Most or all forms of investment involve some risk. Gambling staking money or material goods on an event with an uncertain outcome where the outcome of the event determines whether the stake is lost or additional money or material goods is won. Three elements: Stake, Prize, and Chance

Investing or Gambling? Day-Trading? Penny Stocks? Derivatives (Options, Futures, Swaps)? Betting on Financial Indices? Professional Sports Handicapping or Poker Playing? Card counting?

Research Questions Do gamblers play the stock market and vice versa? If so, to what extent? Does their pattern of gambling differ from gamblers who do not play the stock market? Is there a stronger relationship between gambling and more speculative stock market products? (e.g., 'penny stocks, day trading)? Is there a relationship between problem gambling and high-risk stock play? Day-Trading? If so, do existing problem gambling instruments capture problematic high-risk stock play? Who are the high-risk stock players? What differentiates them from others? Are there investor subgroups and if so what differentiates investor subgroups?

Sample Secondary data analysis of 8498 Canadian adults surveyed via RDD in 2007/2008 Response Rate 46.6% Last major prevalence study of gambling in Canada Included questions about stock market investing

Stock Market Questions Do you yourself buy and sell on the stock market? In the past 12 months, have you purchased any high-risk stocks, options, or futures? Roughly how much money do you put into high-risk stocks, options, or futures in a typical year? About how often do you check the value of these investments in a typical MONTH? What do you estimate is your net loss or gain in the past 12 months from high-risk stocks, options, or futures? In your lifetime, what do you estimate is your net loss or gain from investing in high-risk stocks, options or futures? In the past 12 months, have you done any day trading on the stock market, where you buy and sell stocks several times on the same day? How often do you day trade in atypical MONTH? What do you estimate is your net loss (or gain) in the past 12 months from day trading? In your lifetime, what do you estimate is your net loss (or gain) from day trading?

Results Total Sample N = 8498 Gamblers n= 6010 (70.7%) Have NOT Independently Traded Stocks, Options, or Futures on the Stock Market n = 5443 (90.5%) Traded Stocks, Options, or Futures on the Stock Market n = 534 (8.9%) Have NOT Traded High- Risk Stocks, Options, or Futures n = 393 (71.3%) Traded High-Risk Stocks, Options, or Futures/Day Traded n = 154 (29.3%)

Multivariate Analyses Binary logistic regressions differentiating: Gamblers who independently buy/sell on the stock market compared to gamblers who do not. Gamblers who independently buy/sell high-risk stocks, options, or futures/day trade compared to gamblers who do not Stepwise entry IVs: age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education, employment status, household income, household debt, physical disability, mental health (past year), past month tobacco use, past month alcohol use, past month drug use, number of gambling formats gambled on, frequency of play on each format, CPGI scores

Differences between Gamblers who Independently Buy/Sell on the Stock Market compared to Gamblers who do not Variable Regression Coefficients (B) Wald Statistics Odds Ratios Household Income.176 306.520** 1.193 Employment 98.325** Part-Time (-.508) 14.372**.602 Self-Employed.502 33.744** 1.652 Retired (-.219) 4.662.803 Unemployed (-1.124) 14.474**.325 Homemaker (-.565) 8.800*.568 Student (-.211) 1.327.810 Disability (-1.471) 9.938*.230 Past Month Alcohol Use.518 52.294** 1.679 Gender.494 65.488** 1.638 Ethnicity 61.240** Ethnicity (Asian).973 49.464** 2.646 Ethnicity (Other) (-.191) 6.124*.826 Age.017 38.636** 1.017 Household Debt (-2.349) 35.216** 10.478 Horse/Dog Racing Frequency.382 27.647** 1.465 Bingo Frequency (-.176) 12.847**.839 Skill-Based Games Frequency.105 11.578* 1.110 Table Games Frequency.226 9.900* 1.254 Instant Win Frequency (-.068) 9.500*.934 Lottery Frequency.057 7.801* 1.059 Past Month Tobacco Use (-.195) 8.125*.822 Constant -2.926 282.072**.054 *p <.01 NAGELKERKE R SQUARED = 24.6%. **p <.001 OVERALL PREDICTION SUCCESS = 68.1%

Differences between Gamblers who Buy/Sell High-Risk Stocks or Day Trade compared to Gamblers who do not Variable Regression Coefficients (B) Wald Statistics Odds Ratios Household Income.209 350.373** 1.232 Gender 1.033 226.496** 2.809 Ethnicity 172.903** Asian 1.645 118.799** 5.183 other (-.531) 35.947**.588 Employment Status 152.533** Retired (-.522) 18.665**.593 Self-employed.716 65.563** 2.047 Other (-.718) 38.722**.488 Marital Status 84.755** Married (-.572) 29.532**.564 Widowed (-.471) 6.093.624 Divorced (-.656) 22.193**.519 Never Married.158 1.720 1.171 Past Month Alcohol Use.758 77.660** 2.133 Number of Gambling Formats.245 43.178** 1.278 Casino Table Game Frequency.521 41.173** 1.684 Instant Win Frequency (-.161) 34.156**.852 EGM Frequency (-.276) 32.603**.759 Horse/Dog Racing Frequency.399 28.567** 1.491 Sports Betting Frequency (-.088) 4.136.916 Problem Gambling Status.609 7.225* 1.838 Past Month Tobacco Use (-.435) 33.122**.647 Age.017 29.528** 1.017 Physical Disability (-.338) 8.093*.713 Household Debt (-2.419) 28.046** 11.235 Constant (-4.203) 179.058**.015 *p <.01 NAGELKERKE R SQUARED = 40.9% **p <.001 OVERALL PREDICTION SUCCESS = 75.0%

Conclusions Only 8.9% of gamblers also independently buy/sell on the stock market (so, not that common an activity among gamblers) However, these people still fairly similar to regular gamblers in many ways in that they engage in same number of gambling formats and are no different in terms of problem gambling status. Also no different in terms of marital status, education, drug use, mental health status, and presence of physical disability.

Conclusions Some differences identified (partly due to a very large sample size) but only 24.6% of the variance explained and only 68.1% classification accuracy. Demographically - more likely to be: employed (especially selfemployed or full-time); male; Asian; older; and to have lower household debt, higher incomes. More likely to use alcohol and less likely to use tobacco. Game Play higher frequency of participation in horse race betting, skill-based social betting, casino table games, and lotteries; and less likely to play bingo and instant win tickets.

Conclusions So, are high risk stock players more similar to regular gamblers? Yes and No. No, in sense that differences between the groups is greater (variance explained increases to 40.9% and classification accuracy increases to 75%) These people have higher incomes, more likely to be male, Asian, retired, selfemployed, living common-law, use alcohol, not use tobacco, not have physical disability, lower debt. Yes, in the sense that these people have greater involvement in traditional gambling (play more formats) leading to significantly higher rates of problem gambling. Also have higher frequency involvement in casino table games, horse race betting.

Limitations Constrained by the parameters of secondary data analysis Could not compare non-gamblers Buying or selling high-risk stocks, options, or futures is not the wording I would have used (as some people use these products to actually hedge risk)

Thank you for your attention! Acknowledgements: University of Adelaide, Dr. Paul Delfabbro, and Dr. Robert Williams

Differences between Gamblers who Independently Buy/Sell High-Risk Stocks, Options, or Futures/Day Trade compared to Gamblers who only Buy/Sell Low- Risk Stocks/D Variable Regression Coefficients (B) Wald Statistics Odds Ratios Marital Status 15.067** Married (-.694) 5.270*.499 Widowed (-.675) 1.640.509 Divorced (-.896) 4.719*.408 Never Married.146.159 1.157 Income.104 11.293** 1.110 Casino Table Games Frequency.636 9.505** 1.889 CPGI (Total Score) 1.166 6.763**.312 Gender.525 6.291* 1.690 Physical Disability (-.726) 4.783*.484 Constant.304.303 1.355 *p <.05 NAGELKERKE R SQUARED = 17.7% **p <.01 OVERALL PREDICTION SUCCESS = 64.8%