THE CURRENT STATE OF COLONIAL WATERBIRDS IN SREBARNA MANAGED RESERVE



Similar documents
Ulcinjska Primorje - Montenegro

OCCURRENCE AND NESTING OF PIGMY CORMORANT (PHALACROCORAX PYGMEUS) IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC AND IN NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES. Abstract

Green Infrastructure Case Study Template

Ornithological data relevant to the spread of Avian Influenza in Europe (phase 2)

ON MALHEUR NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, OREGON

Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site Waterbird Monitoring Programme

THE INTRODUCED SACRED IBIS, PREDATOR OF SEABIRDS AND OTHER FRAGILE SPECIES

These Maps Are For The Birds

Establishing large-scale trans-boundaries MPA networks: the OSPAR example in North-East Atlantic

Lower Prut Floodplain - Ecological restoration of the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park LIFE05 NAT/RO/000155

Spring tour B Kiskunság - Bükk Mountains - Lake Tisza - Hortobágy (5 days, 4 nights)

The Ulcinj Salina in Montenegro outstanding natural values at risk

Sewer Studies on Fluid Numbers in the English River Tyne

Advisory Council on the Environment Nature Conservation Subcommittee. Conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill (Platalea minor) in Hong Kong

RECALLING Paragraph b of Article 13 of the Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, 1974 (Helsinki Convention),

Rediscovery of a Milky Stork Mycteria cinerea breeding colony in South Sumatra province, Indonesia

Colonial Waterbirds and North American Aquaculture Scott J. Werner 1, D. Tommy King 1, James F. Glahn 1, and Jay V. Huner 2

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel.:

Lesson 3: Fish Life Cycle

Appendix B: Cost Estimates

Camp. plan template. elements. This section that need to. identify the. vegetation. of flying-fox. also

Canadian Biodiversity: Ecosystem Status and Trends 2010 Technical Thematic Report No. 18 Published by the Canadian Councils of Resource Ministers

of San Francisco Bay produced

DYNAMICS OF EMERGENT MACROPHYTES OVERGROWTH IN LAKE ENGURES

THE DRIN RIVER BASIN

Mallee emu-wren Stipiturus mallee

Ecosystem Approach as a Main Strategy for

BC Coastal Waterbird Survey: Training Module for Volunteers

Double-Crested Cormorants Conflict Management and Research On Leech Lake

Lakes And Reservoirs Mid Atlantic Coastal Plain

USE OF REMOTE SENSING FOR MONITORING WETLAND PARAMETERS RELEVANT TO BIRD CONSERVATION

Red-billed Tropicbird at Praia, Santiago, 30 th April 2011

Translating ecological research results into wind farm practice The Danish experience. Niels-Erik Clausen. 2 Risø DTU

Thunder Bay. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Macro water sharing plans the approach for unregulated rivers

East Sister Island. Park Management Plan

Examining Blanding's Turtle Habitat using Remote Sensing and GIS: A study in the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge, Saginaw, Michigan

Heritage Place Code. Heritage Place Code

Recommended Land Use Guidelines for Protection of Selected Wildlife Species and Habitat within Grassland and Parkland Natural Regions of Alberta

Experience in Wetlands restoration and conservation concerning natural water retention measures. Ministry of Environment and Water, Bulgaria

Lesson Overview. Biodiversity. Lesson Overview. 6.3 Biodiversity

Species-of-the-Week. Blanding s Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) Species of Special Concern in Michigan

Assessing risks to ecosystems - a new global standard

Louisiana s Crude. How Citizen Scientists Help Monitor the Effects of Oil on Birds

Breeding distribution and population trends of the Great Blue Heron in Quebec,

Country overview and assessment

SAVING THE AMAZON OF EUROPE

Black Tern Distribution Modeling

A preliminary ecological. risk assessment of the. impact of tropical fire ants. (Solenopsis geminata) on. colonies of seabirds at.

Doing Business, Small & Medium Enterprise Support and Information Access

Baseline Ecology Survey of Bord na Móna s Bogs Rehabilitation trials and communication

Pond Vocabulary Words and Meanings

KAAMATTI WETLAND, ÄHTÄRI, FINLAND

PROCEDURE. See: Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands (

The Norwegian ecosystem-based management plan for the Barents Sea and sea areas off the Lofoten Islands. The Barents Sea

SPATIAL VARIATION IN THE BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SACCHARINA LATISSIMA

Establishment of a New Migration Monitoring Network across China for the Siberian Crane and Other Waterbirds. Abstract

An analysis of the recovery distribution based on finding probabilities Wojciech K a n ia and Przemysław B usse

RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

The National Park Service Inventory & Monitoring Program Student Opportunities

RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WATERFOWL FROM FISHPONDS IN SAMOKLĘSKI (LUBLIN REGION)

HYDROLOGY OF THE TRANSBOUNDARY DRIN RIVER BASIN

Ecology - scientific study of how individuals interact with their environment 34.1

The Wonderful World of Wetlands BINGO

CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR ELEONORA S FALCON IN GREECE LAYMAN S REPORT

seabird Monitoring in northwestern México

IVATA and IOSEA IOSA - IUCN Scientific Collaboration

Monitoring the Critically Endangered Bird Species (White-shouldered Ibis) in Western Siem Pang Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA)

OROKLINI MARSH. Introduction

Western Snowy Plover Numbers, Nesting Success, Fledging Success and Avian Predator Surveys in the San Francisco Bay, 2010.

Robert E Whale (a.k.a. Rab Nawaz) PMU WWF-Pakistan Karachi; jejeel3@gmail.com

MPA NETWORKS MODULE INTRODUCTION TO MPA NETWORKS. Advantages of Networks 2.2 TYPES OF MPA NETWORKS. Social Networks. Ecological Networks

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

Lead Fishing Weights and Other Fishing Tackle in Selected Waterbirds

Biodiversity Conservation in Egypt (Achievements of a Decade and Future Priorities)

Wetland Bird Survey (Low Tide Counts)

Town of Richmond Hill Beaver Management Policy Summary

Seminário Sociedade Civil, Empresas e Biodiversidade Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian 26 de Setembro de 2007

Muddy River Restoration Project Project Description

Biodiversity Concepts

Aquatic Biomes, Continued

A network for the protection of coastal birds. Life+ ENVOLL

SECTION 7 LANDSCAPE RESTORATION

Biology 3998 Seminar II. How To Give a TERRIBLE PowerPoint Presentation

Enhancing Biodiversity in Urban Ecosystems: The Bird Habitat Contributions of Green Roofs in Urban Areas

Great Crested Newt Habitat Suitability Index

General scheme Human Resources & Settlement Structure

9.0 PUBLIC HEALTH (MOSQUITO ABATEMENT)

Where Do Birds Live?

Pukaskwa National Park State of the Park Report page 1

Position Statement regarding Offshore Wind Proposals on Lake Huron. Lake Huron Centre for Coastal Conservation

Ch. 15-Restoration Ecology

Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat

19 Great Crested Newt species action plan

Appendix A. The Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA)

LAKE OHRID CONSERVATION PROJECT (Case Study on Monitoring &Evaluation)

China The Giant Panda

Algal Blooms, Circulators, Waterfowl and Eutrophic Greenfield Lake, NC. Michael A. Mallin, Matthew R. McIver, Ellen J. Wambach, and Anna R.

Ecology 1 Star. 1. Missing from the diagram of this ecosystem are the

Water Forever: South West Margaret River Forum

Transcription:

Annuaire de l`université de Sofia St. Kliment Ohridski 2004, volume 96, livre 4, pp 313-320 10 session scientifique, Sofia 2003 THE CURRENT STATE OF COLONIAL WATERBIRDS IN SREBARNA MANAGED RESERVE NEVENA KAMBOUROVA Central Laboratory of General Ecology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Gagarin Street 2. E-mail: larus@abv.bg Key words: Srebarna Reserve, colonial waterbirds, spatial distribution, water level Abstract: The colonial waterbirds in Srebarna Managed Reserve was studied in 2001-2003. The direct counting of individuals was used to estimate the number of breeding pairs. In Srebarna Reserve breed 13 colonial waterbirds (Pelecanus crispus, Phalacrocorax carbo, Phalacrocorax pygmeus, Nycticorax nycticorax, Ardeola ralloides, Egretta garzetta, Egretta alba, Ardea cinerea, Ardea purporea, Plegadis falcinellus, Platalea leucorodia, Larus ridibundus and Chlidonias hybrida) distribute in five colonies. The total number of breeding pairs in 2002 and 2003 showed 50 % decrease of pairs compared to that of 2001. These differences are probably due to variations of the water level. The great decrease of breeding pairs was observed in the heronry. The less change was estimated in the colony of other bird species. The water level is an important factor for the number and distribution of waterbird species because it affects other environment factors such as the feeding sites and water surface area. Introduction The world-wide loss of wetlands has significantly increased the needs to manage these types of habitats to sustain their biodiversity especially that of birds. Many factors determine the viability of wetlands but the water depth proves to be the most important one [1-2]. The state of other wetland parameters like water surface area, suitable feeding sites, vegetation cover, depend, on the water level and the alteration of these parameters can affect bird species diversity and numbers [3-9]. The Srebarna Lake is situated in Northeast Bulgaria. It is a Ramsar site (1975), UNESCO biosphere reserve (1977), Monument of World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1983) and Important Bird Area (1990) due to its very rich bird fauna and particularly due to the breeding of the globally threatened species Dalmatian Pelican (Pelecanus crispus), Pygmy Cormorant (Phalacrocorax pygmeus) and Ferruginous Duck (Aythya nyroca). Many European and Bulgarian scientist were stimulated by the high bird diversity and mainly the permanent colony of the 313

Dalmatian Pelican and mixed heronry [10-17]. Comprehensive studies on the ornithofauna of the Srebarna Lake were carried out by Paspaleva-Antonova [18-19] and Michev [20-23]. The aim of this work is firstly, to examine the distribution of colonial waterbirds in the reserve and, secondly tried to look for the possible influence of the water column variations on the number of birds and their distribution. Materials and methods The research was carried out in the Srebarna Managed Reserve (902.2 ha). The lake is situated at the Danube River, 18 km west of the town of Silistra, NE Bulgaria. In the northern part of the reserve is situated Devnia Island. The observations were made during the breeding period (April-June) in 2001-2003. The census of the number of breeding birds in the colonies was made in the beginning of the reproduction period (April), when the nests were well discernable from the places with very good visibility. The observations of individual numbers which left the heronry were made in the breeding period (May) of three consecutive years (according to the method of Jozefik [24]. We also measured the average water column of the lake in the studied years. We examined the differences between the numbers of the breeding pairs in these three studied years according to t- test. Results and Discussion During the three-year study period a total of 13 colonial waterbird species were established in the Srebarna Managed Reserve. They belonged to three orders: Pelecaniformes (3 species), Ciconiiformes (8 species) and Charadriiformes (2 species). The data on the bird species composition and their participation percent (abundance) in the study area for 2001-2003 are shown in Table 1. In 2001 the highest number of breeding pairs (1599) was found and in 2003 - the fewest number (660). The three years differ not significantly from one another in number of breeding pairs ( 2001-2002: t = 1.44, p = 0.16; 2002-2003: t = 0.33, p = 0.74; 2001-2003: t = 1.71, p = 0.09). In 2001 fifty percent of the breeding pairs were Cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) and Pygmy Cormorants, in 2002 Cormorants and Dalmatian Pelicans but in 2003 there was only one species Cormorant. The highest abundance for the three years has the Cormorant, Pygmy Cormorant, Dalmatian Pelican and Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) (Fig. 1). The dynamics of colonial waterbird numbers for the studied period is shown in Fig. 2. 314

Ardea cinerea 4% Egretta garzetta 11% Ardeola ralloides 9% Nycticorax nycticorax 5% Others 11.6% Phalacrocorax pygmeus 14% Pelecanus crispus 10% Phalacrocorax carbo 36% Fig.1. Abundance of Colonial Waterbird Species in Srebarna Managed Reserve for the period 2001-2003. 500 Ph carbo 400 300 200 100 0 2001 2002 2003 Fig. 2. The Dynamics of Colonial Waterbird Numbers in Srebarna Managed Reserve for the Period 2001-2003 Ch hybridus L ridibundus P leucorodia P falcinellus A purpurea A cinerea E alba E garzetta A ralloides N nycticor Ph pygmeus P crispus The thirteen colonial waterbirds were distributed in five colonies in different parts of the reserve (Fig. 3). The mixed heron colony situated in the northern part of the reserve (so-called Babushko blato) was the most numerous one. It comprised nine species - Squacco Heron (Ardeola ralloides), Little Egret, Pygmy Cormorant, Night Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax), Gray Heron (Ardea cinerea), Purple Heron (Ardea purpurea), Great Egret (Egretta alba), Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia), and Glossy Ibis (Plegadis falcinellus). In 2001 the colony occupied an area of 35 000 m 2. About 90 % of the nests were built on Gray Willow (Salix cinerea) trees and the rest - on reed-beds. In 2002 and 2003 the heronry was much dispersed compared to 2001 and this made difficult the estimation of the exact size of the colony. The most numerous species in the colony 315

for the three years are Pygmy Cormorant, Little Egret and Squacco Heron (Table 1). In 2001 the heronry comprised 62% of all colonial waterbirds while in 2002 and 2003 37% and 34%, respectively. The decrease of the breeding pairs in 2002 compared to 2001 was the highest for Pygmy Cormorant (80%), Purple Heron (80%), Squacco Heron (75%), Little Egret (70%) and Gray Heron (62.5%). The colonial bird species feed in the coastal parts of the lake and in the Romanian wetlands nearby. The evaluation of the number of individuals leaving the heronry during the day shows that as a whole in 2002 and 2003 there were more birds (644 and 495 respectively) which went to the Romanian wetlands than in 2001 (460). Fig. 3. Spatial Distribution of Colonial Waterbird Species in Srebarna Managed Reserve (2001-2003): 1/ Mixed heron colony (2001); 2/ Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) colony; 3/ Colony of Dalmatian Pelican (Pelecanus crispus); 4/ Colony of Whiskered Tern (Chlidonias hybridus); 5/ Colony of Black-headed Gull (Larus ridibundus) The colony of the Cormorant is situated in the northern part of the reserve, on Devnia Island. The number of breeding pairs for the period 2001-2003 remains almost constant (Table 1). This is the species with the highest average number of breeding pairs (367) in comparison with other colonial species. 316

The colony of the globally threatened Dalmatian Pelican is situated on the floating reedbeds in the central part of the reserve. The nests are placed on the floating reed platform on an area of 120 m 2 and on the pile platform on an area of 24 m 2. The number of breeding pairs varied for the three studied years. The highest number was estimated in 2001 (128). The colony of this species comprises of 10% of all colonial waterbirds. For the first time in 2001 adult pelicans were observed to eat in central water parts of the reserve together with Cormorants just like Crivelli (1987) described for the Prespa Lake. Number of Pairs (N) and Abundance (N%) of Colonial Waterbirds in Srebarna Reserve, 2001-2003 Species 2001 2002 2003 Mean 01-03 N N% N N% N N% N N% Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo 400 26 350 44 350 53 367 36 Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus 128 8 102 13 80 12 103 10 Pygmy Cormorant Phalacrocorax pygmeus 300 20 60 8 60 9 140 14 Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax 100 6 50 6 20 3 57 5 Squacco Heron Ardeola ralloides 200 13 50 6 30 4 93 9 Little Egret Egretta garzetta 200 13 60 8 60 9 107 10 Great Egret Egretta alba 12 0.8 3 0.4 2 0.3 6 1 Grey Heron Ardea cinerea 80 5 30 4 15 2 42 4 Purple Heron Ardea purpurea 50 3 10 1 8 1 23 2 Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus 28 2 15 2 10 2 18 2 Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia 24 2 20 2 20 3 21 2 Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus 35 2 40 5 5 0.7 27 3 Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida 42 3 25 2 0 0 22 2 Total 1599 815 660 1026 Table The colonies of Whiskered Tern (Chlidonias hybridus) and Black-headed Gull (Larus ridibundus) are the sparsest ones. In 2001 the Whiskered Tern colony was situated on the leaves of the Water lily (Nymphae alba) on an area of approximately 40 m 2 in the western part of the reserve, but in 2002 in the southeast part on an area of 25 m 2. Unfortunately, in 2003 the breeding of this species in the reserve was interrupted because of an unknown reason. For the studied period the Whiskered Tern colony comprised of 2% of all colonial bird species. In 2001 the colony of Black-headed Gull was situated in the northern part of the reserve in the so-called 317

Babushko blato while in 2002 breeding pairs were observed in the northern and southeastern part of the reserve. The nests are placed on old floating reed rootages and the average nest measurements (n = 10) are: nest height 15.4 cm, nest diameter 30.9 cm and diameter of cup 13.5 cm. The nest material is old crumbled leaves of reed. For the first two years the average breeding pairs were 37.5, but in 2003 only 5 were observed. The total number of breeding colonial waterbirds in 2002 and 2003 showed 50 % decrease of pairs compared to 2001 (Table 1). These differences could be probably due to variations of the water column. In May 2001 the observed water depth was 13.03 m (according to the Baltic system) and in May 2002 it was almost 1 m lower, i. e. 12,28 m, in 2003 the water column was 12.73 m. The changes in water depth obviously have an affect on the habitats and these changes influence the number of water birds in the reserve. The greatest decrease was observed in the heronry. The declining of water depth caused the disappearance of the shallow shore part of the reserve, which is the major feeding site for the heron species. As a result in 2002 the individuals that flew away to the Romanian wetlands increased by 184 individuals. Paspaleva-Antonova [18-19] also determines the reduction of the number of all species in mixed colony in comparison with the observation of [10] and [12]. According to her this was a result from the building of a dike (in 1949) between the lake and the Danube River, which interrupted the entering of Danube water in the reserve. The great role of water depth for the species from the heronry was demonstrated again in 1993 (the water column in the lake was 0.20 m), when the Pygmy Cormorant and heron species (without Glossy Ibis and Spoonbill) left the colony site and bred on the Devnia Island [25]. 160 Breeding Pairs and Cheeks 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1955 1958 1961 1964 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 Year Br.pairs Cheeks Fig. 4. Breeding Numbers of Dalmatian Peleican in Srebarna Managed Reserve in the period 1955-2003 318

The little changes in the number of pairs of the Cormorant colony in the three studied years is maybe due to the fact that the colony is situated on the Devnia Island and the breeding and feeding is not affected by the water level fluctuation. The observed fluctuations (Table 1) in breeding numbers of Dalmatian Pelican are within the framework of between - year variations (Fig. 5). This is confirmed by [26] who found that the Dalmatian Pelican colony in Srebarna reserve is not influenced by the decreasing of depth of the water column. Crivelli [7] however declared that the water level and the degradation of nest islands are the most important factors affecting the spatial distribution of the breeding units of Dalmatian Pelican. The variation in number and spatial distribution of Whiskered Tern and Black-headed Gull for the three studied years are probably due to the fact that something in their nesting and feeding habitats has changed during the years. Conclusions Obviously, water depth is an important factor for the number and distribution of colonial waterbirds because it affects other environment factors such as the feeding sites and water surface area. If the process of decreasing water level, which began in 2001 in the Srebarna Lake continue, we may expect that many of the species in heronry will disappear or their number will decrease to a great extent. But the different species have quite different responses to habitat changes and it is necessary to continue monitoring the numbers of waterbirds, the fluctuation in water column and the food condition, to enable the lake to be managed in such a way that the favorable conditions for birds will be maintained. Acknowledgments: I would like to thank my adviser Ass. Prof. Tanjo Michev, Nikola Mikhov from Srebarna Village and Nikolai Petkov for the great help in my work. References 1. Taft, O. W., M. A. Colwell, C. R. Isola and R. J. Safran. 2002. -Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 987-1001 2. Reitan, O., J. Sandvik. 1992. -In: E. J. M. Hagemaijer & T. J. Verstrael (eds.), Bird Numbers 1992. Distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects. Proceedings of the 12 th International Conference of IBCC and EOAC, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen & SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen 3. Fasola, M., F. Barbieri. 1978. -Ibis, 120, 537-540 4. Gec, D. 1983. -Larus, 33-35, 55-68 319

5. Elmberg, J., P. Nummi, H. Poysa and K. Sjoberg. 1994. -Journal of Biogeography, 21, 75-84 6. Musil, P., J. Janda. 1997. -Ekologia Polska, 45 (1), 173-180 7. Crivelli. A. J., D. Hatzilacou, G. Catzadorakis. 1998. -Ibis, 140, 472-481 8. Vogrin, M. 1999. -Ornis Hungarica, 8-9, 27-32 9. Kosinski, Z. 1999. -Acta ornithologica, 34, 27-35 10. Hodek, E. 1882. -Mitt. orn. Ver. Wien, 6, 25-26, 31-34, 58-59 11. Lorenz-Liburnau, L., 1893. -Orn. Jahrbuch, 4, 12-23 12. Reiser, О. 1894. -In Commission bei CarlGerold's Sohn. 204 13. Petrov, A., 1947. -Coll. for Nature Protection, C., 3, 113-116 14. Patev, P. 1950. The Birds in Bulgaria. Fauna of Bulgaria. Volume 1, Sofia, Institute of Zoology, 364 15. Petrov, B.M., S.I. Zlatanov. 1955. -Spisanie na Nauchno-izsledovatelskite Instituti pri Ministerstvo na Zemedelieto, 22, 93-113 16. Mountford, G., I.J. Ferguson-Lees. 1961. -Ibis, 103, 443-471 17. Geissler, K. 1962. -Der Falke, 9 (10), 327-331 18. Paspaleva-Antonova, M. 1961a. PhD Thesis, Institute of Zoology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia 19. Paspaleva-Antonova, M. 1961b. -Izvestiya na Zoologicheskiya Institut s Muzey, 10, 139-163 20. Michev, T. 1963. -Priroda, 5, 88-91 21. Michev, T., 1966. -Izvestiya na Zoologicheskiya Institut s Muzey, 20, 175-182 22. Michev, 1968. -Izvestiya na Zoologicheskiya Institut s Muzey, 27, 13-21 23. Michev, T. 1981. -In: Coll. of Reports, Reg. Symp. of the Project 8 MAB, 20-24.10.1980, Blagoevgrad,Res. and Coord. Center for Environment, Sofia, 516-527 24. Jozefik, M. 1969. -Acta Ornithologica, 11 (7), 1-127 25. Hiebaum, G., Michev, V. Vasilev, J. Uzunov. 2000. Managed Plan of the Srebarna Biosphere Reserve. CLOE, BAN, 157 26. Stoyneva, M., T. Michev. 1997. -In: Farago, S., J. Kerekes (eds). Abstracts in Limnology and Waterfowl monitoring, modeling and management,. Sopron, 21-23 November, 1994, 131-142. 320