Quality Standards for Online Learning



Similar documents
Standards for Quality Online Courses Educational Technology Cooperative

Teaching and Learning Standards and Principles

THE CHECK. academic. A Guide to Online Course Design. What aspects of course design does The Check address? How can The Check be used?

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1

Online Course Self-Assessment Form

The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design

Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers

HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC

Online Course Standards Rubric

Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 2

inacol Standards of Quality for Online Courses

Checklist for Evaluating Online Courses

HCC Online Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011

Coconino Community College Online Course Review Form

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT

Course Development Resource Guide. Professional Development & Community Engagement Educational Technology Support

Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses

DISTANCE EDUCATION. References: Title 5 Sections et seq.; ACCJC Accreditation Standard, II.A.1

Section A: CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND STUDENT ASSESSMENT

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

Online and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines

UW-La Crosse Online Course Evaluation Guidelines

elearning Instructional Design Guidelines Ministry of Labour

Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template

ECU Quality Assurance Guidelines for Online Delivery

Criteria for Evaluating Hybrid and Online Courses

Best Practices and Review Standards for Online Instruction. Recommended Best Practices for Online Instruction

General Procedures for Developing an Online Course

Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final

Roles, Responsibilities and Expectations for Developing and Teaching Online Courses in Continuing and Distance Studies

Penn State Online Faculty Competencies for Online Teaching

Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Handbook

Guide for Evaluating Online Instruction at Santa Rosa Junior College

Categories Criteria Instructional and Audience Analysis. Prerequisites are clearly listed within the syllabus.

Cowboy Quality Online Course Evaluation (Title III) Version 3.0 Course Title Goes Here Total Score=0%

Activities (see attached Appendix G) Page 71 of 100

Course Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative

1. Instructional Design Elements a. Support & Resources Essential Criteria: 1. Students are provided information as to where to get technical help.

Best Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS CREATION, MAINTENANCE, AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE COURSES

Instructional Design Tips

Curriculum Management

EDTC Program Assessment Framework

Guidelines Online Course Design Rubric Based on the Quality Matters 05/06 Rubric NMSU Teaching Academy

How To Write A Rubric For Online Instruction

Quality Assurance Checklists for Evaluating Learning Objects and Online Courses

COURSE ADMINISTRATION

PBS TeacherLine Course Syllabus 1

RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses

Standards for Quality Online Teaching

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA. Online Course Design Guidelines for Faculty

Standards for Online Professional Development

National Standards of Quality for Online Courses

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

SVCC Exemplary Online Course Checklist

FOUNDATIONS OF ONLINE LEARNING IN CALIBRATE

Online Learning Solutions for the Challenges of Catholic Education

National Standards for Quality Online Teaching

Online Teaching Evaluation for State Virtual Schools

A tool to assist in the design, redesign, and/or evaluation of online courses.

OTL532K Principles of 21st Century Learning and Design

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

Community College System of New Hampshire

PROTOCOL FOR PEER OBSERVATION OF AN ONLINE COURSE. The forms to be used for the peer observation of an online course are modeled on

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric

WASC Supplement for Schools with Online Learning as the Primary Delivery System

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS

Before you begin to adapt your course for online learning, consider the following questions:

Online Learning Solutions for the Challenges of Christian Education

GUIDE TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND QUALITY STANDARDS

Discussion (Forums Best Practices) Contents

Guidelines for Minimum Standards for Learning Management System (LMS) Unit Design

Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed and

1. Standard I: Content Knowledge, Skills, and Concepts for Instructional Technology

As a self-evaluation tool, simply apply the quality standards in the rubric to your own course.

STEP ONE Work with instructor to develop/redesign course and fill out sections I VII. COURSE DEVELOPMENT or REVISION Course Information

QUALITY SCORECARD FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF ONLINE EDUCATION PROGRAMS

STANDARDS FOR THE MASTER OF LIBRARY SCIENCE DEGREE/ SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA COORDINATOR LICENSE

Connie Schroeder, Ph.D., Center for Instructional and Professional Development Library E179

DESIGNING ONLINE COURSES TO PROMOTE STUDENT RETENTION

MOU for New Online Program Development: Master of Engineering in Industrial Engineering, Engineering Management Option

Instruction Design Tips for Online Learning

Eagle Learning Online Policies & Procedures

Transcription:

Quality Standards for Online Learning Guidelines regarding minimum standards are used for course development, design, and delivery of quality online instruction (such as course syllabus elements, course materials, assessment strategies, faculty feedback). Quality learning is the goal for any online education program. This quality must be equivalent to the quality delivered via on-ground courses and programs in any institution of higher education. Consequently, we have identified six principles or standards to define the quality expected in this institution s online educational programs and courses. Quality online learning begins with an identity of the relevant higher education community. The online community from the institution must be fully integrated within the larger academic community of that institution (Std 1). Quality online learning elaborates an effective, practical, and sensible structure and organization for development of courses and programs (Std 2). Quality online learning integrates proven and research-based best instructional practices applied in the online environment (Std 3). Quality online learning takes full advantage of a variety of technology tools, has a user-friendly interface and is accessible by learners with special needs (Std 4). Quality online learning uses multiple strategies and activities to assess student readiness for, progress in, and mastery of learning outcomes, and provides students with feedback about their progress (Std 5). Quality online learning includes an ease of use and access to just in time support by both instructors and learners (Std 6).

Standard 1: Community and Faith Integration Description: The course design and the instructor s active presence foster a sense of community among diverse online learners and confirm that online students are an equal and valued part of the APU community of disciples and scholars seeking to advance the work of God in the world through academic excellence promoting a Christian perspective of truth and life. Courses are designed and delivered consistent with approved university s, schools, and departments academic policies and students are informed about those policies through course mechanisms. 1.1A Community-Building 1.1B Community-Building 1.1A1 1.1B1 Course design fosters both academic Instructor personalizes instruction freedom and elearning best within the parameters of APU s practices; thereby creating a research-based elearning learning experience that employs standards; thereby extending best practices, reflects faculty learning opportunities and engaging individuality, and promotes APU s students in a learning experience four cornerstones of Christ, that promotes APU s four community, service, and scholarship. cornerstones of Christ, community, service, and scholarship. 1.1A2 Course establishes sense of community in first week through student introductions in the Class Lounge and instructor-produced introductory materials. 1.1B2 Instructor begins the class with a Welcome announcement, an introductory multimedia presentation, and an Instructor Profile page. 1.1A3 Course design fosters community with student-to-student collaboration, faculty-to-student interaction, and student-to-faculty interaction through various course elements. 1.1B3 Instructor maintains a presence, responds to student email and messages promptly, and actively engages students through forums and other course communication elements. 1.2A Policy Awareness 1.2B Policy Awareness 1.2A1 1.2B1 Syllabus clearly explains course Instructor highlights key syllabus prerequisites, netiquette, and other and course information through a policies and procedures of APU and Welcome multimedia presentation, the department. Syllabus and a Welcome announcement, and an course articulate APU policies Instructor Profile page. regarding accessibility, academic support, and student support,

explaining how students can access related services and resources. 1.2A2 Syllabus clearly states faculty response time for email plus other faculty expectations. 1.2B2 Instructor response to student email is prompt and appropriate as stated in syllabus. 1.3A Faith Integration 1.3B Faith Integration 1.3A1 1.3B1 Course features faith integration Instructor facilitates learning activities that, within the scope of activities in ways that foster course content, encourage the student analysis, synthesis, and dialogue between academic application of Christian perspectives knowledge and Christian faith in the on truth and life relevant to the goal of reclaiming and applying the course content. unity of God s truth. 1.3A2 The dialogue between academic knowledge and Christian truth within the context of the course discipline promotes awareness and application of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. 1.3B2 Instructor s interaction in the course content delivery models application of Christian truth principals within the context of the course discipline. Standard 2: Structure and Interface Description: The course uses instructional models and methods that engage students in active learning and provides students with multiple learning paths to master stated learning outcomes. The course content is based on student needs as well as research-based subject-matter expert recommended information. The course content provides ample opportunities for interaction and communication student to student, student to instructor and instructor to student. 2.1A Structure 2.1B Structure 2.1A1 2.1B1 Navigation throughout the online Navigation throughout the online components of the course is components of the course is intuitive, logical, consistent, and intuitive, logical, consistent, and efficient. efficient.

2.1A2 The course has logically sequenced units and/or lessons that have an overview describing outcomes, activities, assignments, assessments, and resources, 2.1A3 Learning sequence in syllabus and course is identical; both clearly state measurable learning outcomes and clearly explain, from the student perspective, how to meet the outcomes. 2.1A4 The course design facilitates readability and minimizes distractions. 2.1A5 Course integrates faculty expertise into research-based elearning design principles. 2.1A6 Course is designed for faculty who have received cybergogy training regarding technical elements, pedagogical strategies, and fair use issues of elearning. 2.1B2 Provide multiple learning opportunities for students to master the content. 2.1B3 Instruction aligns with syllabus; syllabus modifications by instructor align with the master syllabus as developed within the department. 2.1B4 Instructor adheres to readability standards when adding content. 2.1B5 When adding content, instructor follows research-based elearning design standards regarding accessibility, readability, and learner-centered education. 2.1B6 Faculty complete training before teaching refreshed standards-based courses. 2.2A Instructions 2.2B Instructions 2.2A1 2.2B1 Instructions clearly explain the Students can successfully navigate course structure, how to begin the the course and find components. course, and how to locate and use course tools. 2.2A2 Instructions clearly distinguish between required and optional activities. 2.2B2 Instructor monitors compliance with stated instructions and supplements them as necessary.

2.2A3 Course instructions clearly explain the purpose of course materials and how they are to be used. 2.2B3 The instructor makes use of course materials in ways that demonstrate their relationship toward stated learning outcome mastery. 2.3A Instructional Media 2.3B Instructional Media 2.3A1 Rich media, relevant to course content learning outcomes, are provided in multiple formats for ease of use and access in order to address diverse student needs. 2.3B1 Instructor makes use of personalized media and other media relevant to the content in ways that extend and contribute to student mastery of learning outcomes.

Standard 3: Teaching and Learning Description: The course provides online learners with sufficient instructional input, resources, guides, and supplemental materials that are designed to induce progress toward mastery of identified learning outcomes and are aligned with course activities, and delivered in ways aligned with diverse learning styles of students in an open online environment. Students are provided options for multiple ways of engaging with learning experiences that promote mastery of stated learning outcomes for the identified course content. 3.1A Student-centered Learning 3.1B Student-centered Learning 3.1A1 3.1B1 Course pages and syllabus state Instructor uses course-based how students can meet the learning communication tools to encourage outcomes and explain the and promote student mastery of requirements for student learning outcomes as they are participation in learning activities aligned with each of the various and assignment completion. course learning activities. 3.1A2 Learning activities focus on student-centered learning, promote the achievement of measurable learning outcomes, and are of sufficient rigor, depth, and breadth to achieve the outcomes being addressed. 3.1A3 Course tools and learning activities support active learning by diverse learners through the promotion of student-to-student collaboration, faculty-to-student collaboration, and a variety of instructional models, methods and materials. 3.1B2 Students achieve stated learning outcomes through course activities. 3.1B3 Instructor clearly engages with students via each of the course tools used for learning activities and promotes the learning collaboration among students, and between students and the subject matter. 3.2A Content and Resources 3.2B Content and Resources 3.2A1 3.2B1 Course instructions clearly explain Course site provides easy access to the purpose of course materials and course materials. how they are to be used. 3.2A2 Instructional materials are current, sufficient, easily accessible, and contribute to the achievement of the 3.2B2 Instructor maintains currency of instructional materials that contribute to student achievement

stated course learning outcomes; for example, ISBN numbers are included in course syllabus for easy reference. 3.2A3 Course provides student access to library professionals, research guidance, databases, and resources. 3.2A4 All resources and materials used in the course are appropriately cited. of stated course learning outcomes, and attaches instructional materials in formats (PDF for example) that can be opened in all systems. 3.2B3 Instructor makes reference to research guides and resources and motivates learners to access and use them in learning activities. 3.2B4 Instructor appropriately cites any added resources or materials.

Standard 4: Technology and Accessibility Description: The course takes full advantage of a variety of technology tools, has a user-friendly interface and meets accessibility standards for interoperability and access for learners with special needs. 4.1A Basics 4.1B Basics 4.1A1 4.1B1 Syllabus clearly states minimum Course delivery system faculty, technology requirements (hardware, staff, and contractors ensure browser, software, etc.) and requisite technology is available to required technical skills of the students and that it works with the student. identified hardware, browsers, and other software. 4.1A2 The course provides an orientation opportunity for students to learn the basics of elearning. 4.1B2 Instructional personnel draw attention to the orientation opportunity and ensures students participate in it. 4. 2A Effectiveness 4.2B Effectiveness 4.2A1 4.2B1 The course technologies are current Instructional personnel monitor and readily accessible to students. student participation in the course Proven effective course-relevant to determine whether participation current and emerging technologies is impeded due to technology. are used to support student achievement of the stated learning outcomes. 4.2A2 Technology, media, and course tools support the course learning outcomes, support student engagement, and guide the student to become an active learner. 4.2B2 Evidence from student work and course tools confirm that course tools and media support student engagement, guide the student to become an active learner, and support course learning outcomes. 4.3A Accessibility 4.3B Accessibility 4.3A1 The course features accessible technologies, instructions for obtaining accommodation, equivalent alternatives to auditory 4.3B1 Students needing special accommodations can access course content and activities through equivalent alternatives to auditory

and visual content, and accommodations for the use of assistive technology. and visual content

Standard 5: Student Learning Assessment Description: The course uses multiple strategies and activities to assess student readiness for, and progress in, learning outcome mastery, and provides students with feedback on their progress. 5.1A Strategies & Materials 5.1B Strategies & Materials 5.1A1 5.1B1 Course assessments are appropriate Evidence from students work and for online learning and measure course tools confirms content content mastery, critical thinking mastery, critical thinking skills, and skills, core learning, and core learning of achievement of departmentapproved student-learning student-learning outcomes. department-approved outcomes. 5.1A2 Course grading policy is stated clearly and addresses specific and descriptive criteria for the evaluation of student work and participation, plus the time frame for grading and providing feedback on assignments. 5.1A3 Assessment instruments are sequenced, varied, and appropriate to the student work being assessed, and are consistent with course activities and resources. 5.1B2 Instructor assesses student work and participation using stated grading policy, provides summative feedback that references stated grading criteria, and posts grades within time frame specified by syllabus. 5.1B3 Instructor draws attention to assessment instruments when engaged in the course interactive communication. 5.1A4 Students have multiple opportunities to measure their own learning progress. 5.1B4 Students assess their understanding of course content through self-assessment instruments. 5.2A Feedback 5.2B Feedback 5.2A1 Syllabus states instructor response time for grading and feedback on assignments. 5.2B1 Instructor provides prompt, constructive feedback on student assignments in accordance with stated expectations in syllabus.

Standard 6: Support Description: All technical processes are presented with opportunities for assistance and guidance where students find it necessary. The design and page layout formats are clear and interesting, and avoid distracting or confusing elements. Software that will be necessary is readily available to students before engaging in the program or course(s). Readily available instant help resources are available to the student without disengaging in the course activities. A personal help resource is available to students by email and phone. Online instructors are prepared to teach their students in the online environment and are prepared to provide student technical support for course activity pages during the course. 6A Support 6B Support 6A1 6B1 Technical support is provided for Faculty make use of appropriate students. The course clearly communication tools and articulates how to access help help-resources within the course to features of the course and how to quickly direct students for resolving obtain help from the support desk. technical obstacles. 6A2 Training is provided to instructors in course mechanics and best practices for online instruction. 6B2 Instructors take advantage of the training offered and demonstrate their learning in the online classroom.