LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO



Similar documents
HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

A LABORATORY STUDY ON EFFECT OF TEST CONDITIONS ON SUBGRADE STRENGTH

Soil Testing 24 Compaction and CBR. Compaction Test 4.5 kg BS , , EN DD ENV

PERMEABILITY TEST. To determine the coefficient of permeability of a soil using constant head method.

EXPERIMENT NO.1. : Vicat s apparatus, plunger

METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY OF GRANULAR SOILS

Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength and dynamic cone penetration index of Mahi, Sabarmati and Vatrak Sand

METHOD A7 THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF GRAVEL, SOIL AND SAND

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA

Measurement of Soil Parameters by Using Penetrometer Needle Apparatus

Standard Test Procedures Manual

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF MATERIALS USING THE VIBRATORY HAMMER COMPACTION

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

SOIL-LIME TESTING. Test Procedure for. TxDOT Designation: Tex-121-E 1. SCOPE 2. APPARATUS 3. MATERIALS TXDOT DESIGNATION: TEX-121-E

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 632 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

METHOD OF TEST FOR UNIT WEIGHT OF FRESH CONCRETE

METHOD A10 (a) THE DETERMINATION OF THE IN-PLACE DRY DENSITY OF SOIL OR GRAVEL BY THE SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

Standard Test Procedures Manual

PART I SIEVE ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL RETAINED ON THE 425 M (NO. 40) SIEVE

Figure CPT Equipment

Evaluation of Initial Setting Time of Fresh Concrete

EXPERIMENT 10 CONSTANT HEAD METHOD

COMMENTARY TO AG:PT/T251 - BALL PENETRATION TEST

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATES

INDEX DESCRIPTION MATERIALS APPROVAL OF SUBBASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION MEASUREMENT PAYMENT 6

TECHNICAL Summary. TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades February 2003 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, SPR-2362

The Standard & Modified Proctor Density Tests

DryWeight BulkVolume

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

PHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS

POWDER PROPERTIES LABORATORY

Step 11 Static Load Testing

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

Evaluation of Properties of Soil Subgrade Using Dynamic Cone Penetration Index A Case Study

SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO T 85

Specific volume and absorption properties

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

GUIDELINES FOR TESTING FRESH SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE

Standard Test Procedures Manual

How To Design A Foundation

FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION

Attachment G-1: Pit Latrine Diagram. Fig E.1a: Pit Latrine. Fig E.1b: Plan View of Twin Pits

A.17. OXIDIZING PROPERTIES (SOLIDS)

Calibration of Volumetric Glassware

Quality control: Annex-A.

In-situ Density Determination by Sand Replacement Method

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS

The AASHO Road Test site (which eventually became part of I-80) at Ottawa, Illinois, was typical of northern climates (see Table 1).

TECHNICAL REPORT ON SCALA DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER IRREGULARITY

INTERNATIONAL HOCKEY FEDERATION PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND TEST PROCEDURES FOR HOCKEY BALLS. Published: April 1999

Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

Florida Method of Test for TESTING OF GROUND TIRE RUBBER Designation: FM 5-559

Soil Testing Soil index properties 24. Cone Penetrometer Method BS 1377, , EN DD ENV Semi-Automatic Cone Penetrometer

product manual H-4210A PORTABLE STATIC CONE PENETROMETER

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS AASHTO Designation T 88 (Mn/DOT Modified)

9.00 THE USE OF HUNTER LAND DRAINAGE PERFORATED PIPES. Hunter Underground Systems

Division 2 Section Section 02795

Construction Specifications for Keyhole Pavement Coring and Reinstatement

LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

XI / PHYSICS FLUIDS IN MOTION 11/PA

LABORATORY II. PLASTICITY - Atterberg limits. w L - Cone test, Cassagrande test

Guidelines for Earthquake Bracing of Residential Water Heaters

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL

PRESENTATION ON REPAIR AND REHABILITATION OF BUILDINGS DAMAGED IN EARTHQUAKE. By H P Gupta & D K Gupta

METHOD OF TEST FOR SAMPLING AND TESTING CRUMB RUBBER MODIFIER

DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL GEOTECHANICAL

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (1995 MasterFormat Section 02795)

Compacted Road Base and Subbase Soils

Lab 1 Concrete Proportioning, Mixing, and Testing

Testing and appraisal of Lucobit polymer effect as an additive on asphalt mixture performance

COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2

Treatment of a surface or structure to resist the passage of water in the absence of hydrostatic pressure. presence of hydrostatic pressure.

Mitigation of Expansive Soils Damages

Load Frames

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013

Section SEWER PIPE INSTALLATION AND TESTING

How To Design A 3D Print In Metal

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

Sample preparation for X-ray fluorescence analysis

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (1995 MasterFormat Section 02795)

FIELD SAMPLING AND TESTING MANUAL TESTING PROCEDURES FOR ALL TESTS

6 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES

SELECTING THE ELECTRIC VIBRATOR

Construction Materials Testing. Classes of Test

Geotechnical Testing Methods II

SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF UNBOUND GRANULAR PAVEMENT LAYERS

Physics 1114: Unit 6 Homework: Answers

Transcription:

LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO STANDARD IS: 2720 (Part 16) 1979. DEFINITION California bearing ratio is the ratio of force per unit area required to penetrate in to a soil mass with a circular plunger of 50mm diameter at the rate of 1.25mm / min. APPARTUS Moulds 2250cc capacity with base plate, stay rod and wing nut confirming to 4.1, 4.3 and 4.4 of IS: 9669-1980. Collar confirming to 4.2 of IS: 9669-1980. Spacer Disc confirming to 4.4 of IS: 9669-1980. Metal rammer confirming to IS: 9189-1979. Expansion measuring apparatus with the adjustable stem, perforated plates, tripod confirming and to weights confirming to 4.4 of IS: 9669-1980. Loading machine having a capacity of at least 5000kg and equipped with a movable head or base that travels at a uniform rate of 1.25mm / min for use in forcing the penetration plunger in to the specimen. Penetration plunger confirming to 4.4 of IS: 9669-1980. Dial gauge two numbers reading to 0.01mm. IS sieves 37.50 or 22.50 or 19mm and 4.75mm. Miscellaneous apparatus such as mixing bowl, straight edge, scales, soaking tank, drying oven, filter paper, dishes and calibrated measuring jar. PROCEDURE There are two types of methods in compacting soil specimen in the CBR moulds i. Static Compaction method. ii. Dynamic Compaction method.

The material used in the above two methods shall pass 19mm sieve for fine grained soils and 37.50mm sieve for coarse materials up to 37.50mm. Replace the material retained on 19mm sieve by an equal amount of material passing 19mm sieve and retained on 4.75mm sieve Replace the material retained on 37.50mm sieve by an equal amount of material passing 37.50mm sieve and retained on 4.75mm sieve. Static Compaction In this method calculate the mass of wet soil at required moisture content to give a desired density when compacted in a standard test mould as given below Volume of mould = 2250cc. Weight of dry soil (W) = 2250 x MDD. m Weight of wet soil =1+ ---------- x W 100 Weight of water = Weight of wet soil - Weight of dry soil. m = Optimum moisture content obtained from the laboratory compaction test. Take oven dried soil sample of calculated weight and thoroughly mix with water (OMC) as obtained from the above equation. Record the empty weight of the mould with base plate, with extension collar removed (m 1 ). Place the correct mass of the wet soil in to the mould in five layers. Gently compact each layer with the spacer disc. Place a filter paper on top of the soil followed by a 5cms displacer disc. Compact the mould by pressing it in between the platens of the compression testing machine until the top of the spacer disc comes flush with the top of the mould. Held the load for about 30 seconds and then release.

In some soil types where a certain amount of rebound occurs, it may be necessary to reapply load to force the displacer disc slightly below the top of the mould so that on rebound the right volume is obtained. Remove the mould from the compression testing machine. Remove the spacer disc and weigh the mould with compacted soil (m 2 ). Replace the extension collar of the mould. Prepare two more specimens in the same procedure as described above. Dynamic Compaction Take representative sample of soil weighing approximately 6kg and mix thoroughly at OMC. Record the empty weight of the mould with base plate, with extension collar removed (m 1 ). Replace the extension collar of the mould. Insert a spacer disc over the base plate and place a coarse filter paper on the top of the spacer disc. Place the mould on a solid base such as a concrete floor or plinth and compact the wet soil in to the mould in five layers of approximately equal mass each layer being given 56 blows with 4.90kg hammer equally distributed and dropped from a height of 450 mm above the soil. The amount of soil used shall be sufficient to fill the mould, leaving not more than about 6mm to be struck off when the extension collar is removed. Remove the extension collar and carefully level the compacted soil to the top of the mould by means of a straight edge. Remove the spacer disc by inverting the mould and weigh the mould with compacted soil (m 2 ). Place a filter paper between the base plate and the inverted mould. Replace the extension collar of the mould. Prepare two more specimens in the same procedure as described above.

In both the cases of compaction, if the sample is to be soaked, take representative samples of the material at the beginning of compaction and another sample of remaining material after compaction for the determination of moisture content. Each sample shall weigh not less than 100g for fine-grained soils and not less than 500 for granular soils. Place the adjustable stem and perforated plate on the compacted soil specimen in the mould. Place the weights to produce a surcharge equal to the weight of base material and pavement to the nearest 2.5kg on the perforated plate. Immerse the whole mould and weights in a tank of water allowing free access of water to the top and bottom of specimen for 96 hours. Test for Swelling This test is optional and may be omitted if not necessary. Determine the initial height of specimen (h) in mm. Mount the expansion-measuring device along with the tripod on the edge of the mould and record the initial dial gauge reading (d s ). Keep this set up as such undisturbed for 96 hours noting down the readings every day against the time of reading. Maintain a constant water level through out the period of soaking. Note the final reading of the dial gauge at the end of soaking period (d h ). Calculations for Swelling d f -d s Expansion ratio = ----------- x 100 h d s = Initial dial gauge reading in mm d f = final dial gauge reading in mm h = initial height of specimen in mm Penetration Test After 96 hours of soaking take out the specimen from the water and remove the extension collar, perforated disc, surcharge weights and filter paper.

Drain off the excess water by placing the mould inclined for about 15 minutes and weigh the mould. Testing of CBR specimen Place the mould on the lower plate of the testing machine with top face exposed To prevent upheaval of soil in to the hole of surcharge weights, place 2.5kg annular weights on the soil surface prior to seating the penetration plunger after which place the reminder of the surcharge weights. Set the plunger under a load of 4 kg so that full contact is established between the surface of the specimen and the plunger. Set the stress and strain gauges to zero. Consider the initial load applied to the plunger as the zero load. Apply the load at the rate of 1.25 mm / min. Take the readings of the load at penetration of 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4, 5, 7.5, 10 and 12.5. Raise the plunger and detach the mould from the loading equipment. Collect the sample of about 20 to 50gms of soil from the top 30mm layer of specimen and determine the water content in accordance with IS: 2720 (Part 4) 1973. Examine the specimen carefully after the test is completed for the presence of any over size soil particles, which are likely to affect the results if they happen to be located directly below the penetration plunger.

CALCULATION OF CBR FROM LOAD PENETRATION CURVE Plot the load penetration curve in natural scale, load on Y - axis and penetration on X axis as shown in Fig: 2.9.2. If the curve is uniformly convex upwards although the initial portion of the curve may be concave upwards due to surface irregularities make correction by drawing a tangent to the upper curve at the point of contra flexure as below 100 90 80 NO CORRECTION REQUIRED Load on Piston in Kg/Cm 2 70 60 50 40 30 CORRECTED 5mm PENETRATION CORRECTED 2.5mm PENETRATION 20 10 CORRECTED FOR CONCAVE UPWARD SHAPE 0 2.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 12.50 Penetration in mm Load vs. Penetration curve Take the intersection point of the tangent and the X axis as the origin. Calculate the CBR values for penetration of 2.50mm and 5.00mm. Corresponding to the penetration value at which CBR is to be desired, take the corrected load values from the load penetration curve and calculate the CBR from the equation P T x C f California Bearing Ratio = ------------- x 100. P S

P T = Corrected unit test load corresponding to the chosen penetration from load penetration curve P S = Total standard load for the same depth of penetration, which can be taken from the Table below C f = Proving ring correction factor. Standard loads at specified penetrations Penetration depth (mm) Unit Standard load Kgf/ cm 2 Total Standard load (Kgf) 2.50 70 1370 5.00 105 2055 7.50 134 2630 10.00 162 3180 12.50 183 3600 REPORT Report the CBR value to the nearest second decimal. Take the average of three test specimens as the CBR value of the test. Generally, the CBR value at 2.50mm penetration will be greater than that at 5.00mm penetration and in such case take the value at 2.50mm as the CBR value. If the CBR value corresponding to a penetration of 5.00mm exceeds that of 2.50mm,repeat the test. If the identical results follow, take the value corresponding to 5.00mm as the CBR value. PRECAUTIONS Clean the holes of the base plate and that of perforated disc thoroughly. Align the surcharge weight with the plunger so that the plunger penetrates freely in to the soil. Format on next page