ELA I-II English Language Arts Performance Level Descriptors



Similar documents
Grade 8 English Language Arts Performance Level Descriptors

Grade 6 English Language Arts Performance Level Descriptors

PENNSYLVANIA COMMON CORE STANDARDS English Language Arts Grades 9-12

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

English 2 - Journalism Mitch Martin: mmartin@naperville203.org

HIV, STD & Pregnancy Prevention

Common Core State Standards Grades 9-10 ELA/History/Social Studies

READY NCEXTEND2 End-of-Grade English Language Arts (ELA)/Reading Grades 3-8 Assessments

READING. Common Core Standards-Based. Graphic Organizers for GRADES In-Depth Analysis. Created by Tracee Orman

Montgomery County Public Schools English 9B Exam Review

Reading ELA/Literacy Claim 1

LDC Template Task Collection 2.0

SIXTH GRADE UNIT 1. Reading: Literature

The Alignment of Common Core and ACT s College and Career Readiness System. June 2010

Unit 1/Concept 2 Grade 8 ELA Grade 8 ELA Start Date: September 30, 2013 End Date : October 25, 2013

Integrating the Common Core Standards into the Music Curriculum

English Language Arts Grade 8 PA Alternate Eligible Content

Grade Level: 2 nd Grade

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC COMMON CORE ALIGNMENT PROJECT

FSD Grade 2 READING. Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text.

Maryland Common Core State Curriculum Framework Standards for Writing Standards in Science and Technical Subjects. Grades 9-12

Literacy Standards Articulated Across AQF Qualification Levels

A + dvancer College Readiness Online Alignment to Florida PERT

GRADE 11 English Language Arts Standards Pacing Guide. 1 st Nine Weeks

Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects

Alignment of the National Standards for Learning Languages with the Common Core State Standards

Twin Cities Academy High School. Best Practices

English 4: Florida College Prep, Grade 12 Curriculum Map

Literary Elements and the Short Story Essential Question: Why do we tell stories? Common Core Standards Learning Objectives Suggested Works

Intended Use of the document: Teachers who are using standards based reporting in their classrooms.

English 7 Essential Curriculum

Reading for Success : A Novel Study for Stuart Little by E.B. White. Common Core Standards Grades 5, 6, 7

Close Reading (CLR) Score Range KEY IDEAS AND DETAILS

English Language Standards. English Language Standards

Teacher s Guide. Alignment with the Common Core State Standards for Reading Alignment with the Common Core State Standards for Writing...

#804 Digital Media II,

Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Assessment

National Essential Skills Survey / Common Core State Standards / NYS ELA Standards / CDOS / State Assessment Crosswalk

How To Reconcile The Conflict Between Individual Rights And Collective Responsibility Toward The Commons

Writing Emphasis by Grade Level Based on State Standards. K 5.1 Draw pictures and write words for specific reasons.

How To Write A Novel

Teacher's Guide to Meeting the Common Core State Standards* with Scott Foresman Reading Street 2008

by Nicole Page, Holly Scott, and Charlotte Davis

Lesson Title: Argumentative Writing (Writing a Critical Review)

Text-Dependent Questions Reflecting Common Core Standards for Reading By Grade Level Middle

Short Stories Grade 9

Teaching Literacy and Meeting Common Core in CTE Classes

Common Core Writing Rubrics, Grade 3

Bills, Budgets and Bank Accounts

LANGUAGE! 4 th Edition, Levels A C, correlated to the South Carolina College and Career Readiness Standards, Grades 3 5

Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Assessment. Interpreting Your Score

LANGUAGE ARTS K 12 SUBJECT BOOKLET

Montgomery County Public Schools Advanced English Semester A Exam Review

Units of Study 9th Grade

English II Writing. Persuasive Writing Rubric

Table of Contents. Introduction 12 Standard Organization 18. K-5 Reading 20 Enduring Understandings 20 Essential Questions 21

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

A Teacher s Guide: Getting Acquainted with the 2014 GED Test The Eight-Week Program

Reading Standards for Literature

Everett Public Schools Framework: Digital Video Production II

New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards: For Language Arts Literacy

Minnesota Academic Standards English Language Arts K

How To Teach Literacy

Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening June 1, 2009 FINAL Elementary Standards Grades 3-8

English Language Proficiency Standards: At A Glance February 19, 2014

Purposes and Processes of Reading Comprehension

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

M/J Language Arts 3, 8 th grade

Common Core Progress English Language Arts

PhD Programs. Dissertation Rubric

The Arts and the Common Core:

Essay Instructions Activity: 1) What do I want you to learn? 2) Why do I want you to learn it? 3) How will I know that you have learned it?

Rubrics for Assessing Student Writing, Listening, and Speaking High School

CONNECTING THE COMMON CORE GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND THE GEORGIA GRADE 8 WRITING ASSESSMENT GRADE 8

Virginia English Standards of Learning Grade 8

Everett Public Schools Framework: Digital Photography I

Common Core State Standards for. English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects

Demonstrating Understanding Rubrics and Scoring Guides

THE NEW ACADEMIC ESSENTIALS: COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS 8/13/13

Illinois School for the Deaf Course Curriculum. Craft and Structure RL.6.4. RL.6.5. RL.6.6. Integration of Knowledge and Ideas RL.6.7. RL.6.8. RL.6.9.

ISTEP+ Online Experience Answer Keys

A Review of the South Carolina College- and Career-Ready Standards in English Language Arts and Mathematics

Grade 8: Module 4: Overview

British Literature, Quarter 2, Unit 1 of 3. Macbeth. Overview

Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts

Microsoft Word 2013 Basics

CRCT Content Descriptions based on the Georgia Performance Standards. Reading Grades 1-8

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES

Common Core State Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects, Grades 9-10

I. Title of Lesson: Learning from Artifacts and What Artifacts Tell Us

High School Communications Curriculum Indicators tested/taught indicator

the treasure of lemon brown by walter dean myers

EXJ 201. Show a little understanding of the persuasive purpose of the task but neglect to take or to maintain a position on the issue in the prompt

Assoc Degree Applic. - Transfer to UC/CSU/Private

Tab 3: STEM Alignment * Identifies connections between recognized STEM Career Cluster standards and NDG Linux Essentials curriculum.

Reading and Viewing Achievement Standards

by Learning Area Achievement Objectives The New Zealand Curriculum Set of 8 charts

Date Re-Assessed. Indicator. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RF.5.3 Know and apply grade-level phonics and word analysis skills in decoding words.

American Literature, Quarter 1, Unit 2 of 3 The Puritan Tradition and The Crucible. Overview. (1 day = minutes)

Northern Essex First Year Seminar Language and Composition

Transcription:

Limited ELA I-II English Language Arts Performance Level Descriptors A student performing at the Limited Level demonstrates a minimal command of Ohio s Learning Standards for ELA I-II English Language Arts. A student at this level has an emerging ability to determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of a text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details while providing an objective summary of the text, delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient while identifying false statements and fallacious reasoning, and introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. When reading literary text, a student at the Limited Level can: Reference basic textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly or support analysis of simple inferences drawn from the text; Identify a simple theme or central idea; provide a retelling of the text; Identify how characters develop, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme; Determine, using textual support, the literal meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text; Identify an author s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it, and manipulate time; Describe an explicit point of view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States; Describe depictions of a subject or a key scene in two different artistic mediums; Recognize that an author draws on source material. When reading informational text, a student at the Limited Level can: Reference textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly or support analysis of simple inferences drawn from the text; Identify a simple central idea; provide a retelling of the text; Identify how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order of points made and how they are introduced and developed; Determine, using textual support, the literal meaning of words and phrases; Describe how an author s ideas or claims are presented by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text; Identify an explicit point of view or purpose in a text; Describe various accounts of a subject told in different mediums; Identify the argument and claims in a text, describing basic reasons and evidence that support the claim; Page 1 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016

Identify basic aspects of seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance. When writing, a student at the Limited Level can: Provide a claim with lapses in focus, use inconsistent or unclear organizational structure, may reference information that demonstrates a partial understanding of grade-level texts, employ simple sentence construction and word choice; Demonstrate a lack of command of the conventions of grade-appropriate standard English grammar, usage, and mechanics. Page 2 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016

Basic A student performing at the Basic Level demonstrates a partial command of Ohio s Learning Standards for ELA I-II English Language Arts. A student at this level has a general ability to determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of a text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details while providing an objective summary of the text, delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient while identifying false statements and fallacious reasoning, and introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. When reading literary text, a student at the Basic Level can: Cite basic textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as simple inferences drawn from the text; Determine a theme or central idea and describe its development; provide a summary of the text; Describe how characters develop over the course of the text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme; Determine, using textual support, the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; Describe an author s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it, and manipulate time; Describe a particular point of view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on general knowledge of world literature; Compare and contrast the differences of a subject or key scene in two different artistic mediums, including what is included in each treatment; Describe how an author draws on and transforms source material. When reading informational text, a student at the Basic Level can: Cite basic textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as simple inferences drawn from the text; Determine a central idea and describe its development; provide a summary of the text; Describe how the author unfolds an analysis or a series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and basic connections between them; Determine, using textual support, the meaning of words and phrases, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; Describe how an author s ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text; Identify a point of view or purpose in a text and describe how basic rhetoric advances that point of view or purpose; Compare and contrast various accounts of a subject told in different mediums, identifying explicit details emphasized in each account; Delineate the argument and specific claims in a text, determine whether the reasoning is valid or the evidence is relevant and sufficient; Describe specific aspects of seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance. When writing, a student at the Basic Level can: Adequately sustain a focused claim, reference a counterclaim when appropriate, include an organizational structure that provides a sense of completeness, provide adequate support by citing evidence that demonstrates an understanding of grade-level texts, introduce some variation in sentence structure and adequate word choice; Demonstrate a basic command of the conventions of grade-appropriate standard English grammar, usage, and mechanics. Page 3 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016

Page 4 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016

Proficient A student performing at the Proficient Level demonstrates an appropriate command of Ohio s Learning Standards for ELA I-II English Language Arts. A student at this level has a consistent ability to determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of a text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details while providing an objective summary of the text, delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient while identifying false statements and fallacious reasoning, and introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. When reading literary text, a student at the Proficient Level can: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text; Determine a theme or central idea and analyze in detail its development, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text; Analyze how complex characters develop over the course of the text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme; Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone; Analyze how an author s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it, and manipulate time create such effects as mystery, tension, or surprise; Analyze a particular view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature; Analyze the representation of a subject or a key scene in two different artistic mediums, including what is emphasized or absent in each treatment; Analyze how an author draws on and transforms source material. When reading informational text, a student at the Proficient Level can: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text; Determine a central idea and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text; Analyze how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections that are drawn between them; Determine the meaning of words and phrases, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone; Analyze in detail how an author s ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text; Determine an author s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose; Analyze various accounts of a subject told in different mediums, determining which details are emphasized in each account; Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning; Analyze seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance, including how they address related themes and concepts. When writing, a student at the Proficient Level can: Thoroughly sustain a focused claim and fully address a counterclaim when appropriate, utilize an effective organizational structure that creates a coherent argument or progression of ideas with relevant Page 5 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016

and varied types of support by citing relevant and sufficient evidence that demonstrates a strong understanding of grade-level texts, and vary sentence structure with purposeful word choice to enhance meaning; Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar, usage, and mechanics. Page 6 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016

Accelerated A student performing at the Accelerated Level demonstrates a strong command of Ohio s Learning Standards for ELA I-II English Language Arts. A student at this level has a superior ability to determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of a text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details while providing an objective summary of the text, delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient while identifying false statements and fallacious reasoning, and introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. When reading literary text, a student at the Accelerated Level can: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support a deep analysis of what the text says as well as complex inferences drawn from the text; Determine and evaluate a theme or central idea and analyze in detail its development, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide a comprehensive, objective summary of the text; Analyze the effectiveness of the development of complex characters, including how they interact to advance the plot or shape the theme; Determine the meaning of complex words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze and evaluate the rhetorical impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone; Analyze how an author s choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it, and manipulate time create such effects as mystery, tension, or surprise, and examine their impact on the text as a whole; Analyze competing points of view or cultural experiences reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature; Analyze the representation of a subject or a key scene in two different artistic mediums, including what is emphasized or absent in each treatment, and evaluate its effect on the reader s or viewer's interpretation; Analyze the effectiveness of how an author draws on and transforms source material. When reading informational text, a student at the Accelerated Level can: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support a deep analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as complex inferences drawn from the text; Determine and evaluate a central idea and analyze in detail its development, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide a comprehensive, objective summary of the text; Evaluate the rhetorical effect of how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and connections drawn between them; Analyze the meaning of words and phrases, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; evaluate the cumulative rhetorical effect of specific word choices on meaning and tone; Analyze and explicate how an author s ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text; Analyze an author s point of view or purpose in a text and evaluate the effectiveness of an author's use of rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose; Analyze various accounts of a subject told in different mediums, evaluating the effect of the emphasis of different details in each account; Explicate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, citing specific language from the text in an assessment of whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify subtle instances of false statements and fallacious reasoning; Evaluate the reasoning and rhetorical strategies employed in seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance, including how they address related themes and concepts. Page 7 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016

When writing, a student at the Accelerated Level can: Thoroughly sustain a compelling, focused claim and a fairly treated and fully addressed counterclaim when appropriate, utilize a purposeful organizational structure that creates coherence with specific, appropriate, and integrated support that demonstrates a strong and nuanced understanding of gradelevel texts, and purposefully employ sentence structure and word choice to enhance the argument or progression of ideas; Demonstrate a strong command of the conventions of standard English grammar, usage, and mechanics. Page 8 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016

Advanced A student performing at the Advanced Level demonstrates a distinguished command of Ohio s Learning Standards for ELA I-II English Language Arts. A student at this level has a sophisticated ability to determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of a text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details while providing an objective summary of the text, delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient while identifying false statements and fallacious reasoning, and introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. When reading literary text, a student at the Advanced Level can: Cite strong textual evidence as well as complex inferences from multiple parts of the text to support a deep analysis of the text; Evaluate multiple themes or central ideas and analyze in detail how they are developed and shaped by specific details; provide an objective, comprehensive summary of the text; Evaluate the effectiveness of the author's subtle development of complex characters over the course of the text, including how nuanced interactions serve to advance the plot or shape the theme; Determine the meaning of complex words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative, connotative, and nuanced meanings; analyze and evaluate the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone, including analogies and allusion; Analyze how an author structures a text, orders events, and manipulates time, evaluating the impact these choices have on the text as a whole; Evaluate competing views or cultural experiences across works of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature; Analyze a subject or a key scene in two different artistic mediums, including what is subtly emphasized or absent in each treatment, and evaluate how these differences affect the reader s or viewer's interpretation; Evaluate the effectiveness of how an author draws on and transforms source material in a specific work, including the effect of details not included in the transformation. When reading informational text, a student at the Advanced Level can: Cite strong textual evidence as well as complex inferences from multiple parts of the text to support a deep analysis of the text; Page 9 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016

Evaluate multiple central ideas and analyze in detail their development, including how they emerge and are shaped and refined by specific details; provide a comprehensive, objective summary of the text; Evaluate the rhetorical effect of how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and subtle connections between them; Analyze the meaning of complex words and phrases, including figurative, connotative, technical, and nuanced meanings; evaluate the cumulative rhetorical effect of specific word choices on meaning and tone; Evaluate the rhetorical impact of how an author s ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text; Analyze an author s implicit point of view or purpose in a complex text and evaluate the effectiveness of an author's use of rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose; Analyze various accounts of a complex subject told in different mediums, evaluating the effect of the emphasis and absence of different details in each account; Explicate and evaluate the arguments and specific claims in a text, citing specific language from the text in an assessment of whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify additional support that can be drawn from existing evidence; identify subtle instances of false statements and fallacious reasoning; Evaluate the reasoning and rhetorical strategies in seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance, including how they address related themes and concepts, including references and allusions within provided historical documents. When writing, a student at the Advanced Level can: Thoroughly sustain a compelling, focused claim and a fairly treated and fully addressed counterclaim when appropriate, utilize a purposeful and efficient organizational structure that creates coherence with specific, appropriate, and integrated support that demonstrates a mature and nuanced understanding of grade-level texts, and purposefully and effectively employ sentence structure and word choice to enhance the argument or progression of ideas; Demonstrate a mature command of the conventions of standard English grammar, usage, and mechanics. Page 10 ELA I-II Performance Level Descriptors January 2016