Restaurant Grading in New York City at 18 Months Public Recognition and Use of Grades

Similar documents
How to Avoid Fines & Poor Restaurant Grades in a New York City Health Inspection

Volume RESTAURANT X. 123 Main Street, Phoenix, Arizona. Food Safety Manual

There may be an additional section covering health and safety concerns which fall outside the scope of the national food hygiene rating scheme.

Safe Storage of Raw Animal Foods

General food hygiene rules

Food manager certification/recertification training Food manager orientation of food safety programs Preparation for food management employment

Prepared by the FDA National Retail Food Team

Address of food business: 25 Ranworth Road, Norwich, NR5 8EB Date of Inspection: 27 July 2015

TRAINER: Read this page ahead of time to prepare for teaching the module.

Johnson & Wales University s Gold Standard for Food Safety

Good Hygiene Practices for Catering at Outdoor Events

Bosch kitchen hygiene tips.

The high school's nurse reported no notable illnesses among the students.

Food Safety is in Your Hands! Alejandra Menjivar Community Nutrition Educator & Alejandra Navarro Community Nutrition Educator

Professional Food Manager Certification Training Version 4.0

FIVE KEYS TO SAFER FOOD MANUAL

Table of Contents. Introduction Personal Hygiene Temperature Control Cross-contamination Cleaning and Sanitizing...

I. COURSE DESCRIPTION

Food delivery & storage

Food Poisoning Facts By Dr Yunes Teinaz Acting Head of Environmental Health London Borough of Hackney

Workbook for Developing an Active Food Safety Management System

Requirements for Temporary Food Establishments

ABU DHABI FOOD CONTROL AUTHORITY. Food Poisoning

Food Safety Is Top Priority

The original inspection report is reproduced below with brief notes showing what was found at the time of the re-rating visit <in blue>.

National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System - Enteric Bacteria. A program to monitor antimicrobial resistance in humans and animals

Qualification Specification HABC Level 3 Award in Supervising Food Safety in Catering (QCF)

1 HOUR SAN CE CBDM Approved. Food Protection Connection. Active. by Melissa Vaccaro, MS, CHO. Managerial Control. Nutrition & Foodservice Edge

Preparing Food at Home advice and legal requirements

Food Safety Guide for Family Day Care Educators

Food Surface Sanitizing

Food od hygiene: still a relevant nosocomial issue

Keep It Healthy! Food Safety Employee Guide

FOOD HYGIENE & KITCHEN SAFETY

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE S (SOP S) FOR HAZARDOUS ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) PLANS

Food Safety and Sanitation Guidelines. Culinary Arts

Additional copies are available from:

TRAINER: Read this page ahead of time to prepare for teaching the module.

The Financial Impact of

Food Safety Manual for the Food Service Worker

GUIDELINES TO THE LEVEL TWO CERTIFICATION IN FOOD PROTECTION

Summary of Listeria monocytogenes Compliance Guideline for Small and Very Small Meat and Poultry plants that Produce Ready-To-Eat Products

Home Food Safety Myths and Facts for Consumers. The Partnership for Food Safety Education

Sanitary Food Preparation & Safe Food Handling

Food Safety Evaluation Checklist. Directions

Food Safety Manual for the Food Service Worker

University Foodservice Employees Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Training

The course and qualification may be taken as a stand-alone certificate, or as part of a wider course of training.

Guidance Document for the Risk Categorization of Food Premises

Food safety checklist How well does your food business rate?

Ensure appropriate food safety practices are followed whilst food is prepared, cooked and served

Sanitizing the Kitchen

SEALED AIR LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RE-IMAGINE TRAINING AND COMPLIANCE

Food Safety at the Grocery Store

Why do Pest Infestations Occur? 3. Why is Pest Management Important? 4. Who is Responsible for Pest Control? 5. Types of Common Pests 6

Name of Business. Record 1- Approved Food Suppliers List

Food Safety Manual for the Food Service Worker

Performance Audit Health Department Food Protection Program

FOOD POISONING. Information Leaflet. Your Health. Our Priority. Infection Prevention Stepping Hill Hospital

Public health and safety of eggs and egg products in Australia. Explanatory summary of the risk assessment

What to Expect When You re Inspected:

What to Expect When You re Inspected: A Guide for Food Service Operators

HYGIENE IN THE GALLEY

Maricopa County. Food Code References for Produce. Receiving. Storage

FOOD SERVICE SANITATION AND INSPECTIONS II

This Food Safety Plan was developed in New York as an example for growers. Each grower must develop their own plan which fits their operation.

Have you ever wanted to help animals and people stay healthy? Have you ever thought about working in veterinary medicine? Well, I m here to explain

4

Candidate Study Guide for the Illinois Food Service Sanitation Manager Examinations

Guidance for School Food Authorities: Developing a School Food Safety Program Based on the Process Approach to HACCP Principles

Guidance for School Food Authorities: Developing a School Food Safety Program Based on the Process Approach to HACCP Principles

STATUTORY AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE

02.11 Food and Nutrition Services

Managing Food Safety: A Manual for the Voluntary Use of HACCP Principles for Operators of Food Service and Retail Establishments

Template for Review and Update of the Child Nutrition Food Safety Plan i

STUDY GUIDE: ABATTOIR HYGIENE

IS THERE EFFECTIVE OVERSIGHT OF CERTIFIED FARMERS MARKETS IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY?

World Health Day 2015

GUIDELINES TO THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH S CERTIFICATION IN FOOD PROTECTION

Leila Kakko Tampere University of Applied science TRADITIONAL FOOD IN COMBATING FOODBORNE PATHOGENS 2011

Level 4 Award in Food Safety Management for Manufacturing

United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Benefits of Protecting Your Community From Sanitary Sewer Overflows

The Professional Food Handlers Guide. (In compliance with new Australian Food Safety Standards)

Liability of Environmental Health Agencies (and Inspectors) for Allegedly Negligent Inspections

Cold storage in private households: recommendations and consumer real life behaviour

Managing your watering system to improve feed conversion

Personal Injury TYPES OF HOLIDAY ILLNESSES. Telephone

Assessment: Basic Culinary Arts

Food Safety and Sanitation Manual

Hygiene Standards for all Food Businesses

National Food Safety standard of the People s Republic of China

Introduction. Chapter 1

REQUIREMENTS FOR TRADE SHOWS

Release: 1. HLTPOP409C Identify pest control strategies

Standard Interpretation and Application

Safer Pest Control for Child Care Facilities

Don t let food make you sick:

March 3, Dear Dietary Guidelines Committee:

SAFE HEALTHY CHILDREN A Health and Safety Manual for Childcare Providers

FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Based on the principles of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP)

Transcription:

Restaurant Grading in New York City at 18 Months Public Recognition and Use of Grades Trends in Restaurant Sanitary Conditions and Foodborne Illnesses

Introduction In July 2010, the Health Department began requiring restaurants in all five boroughs to post letter grades summarizing their sanitary inspection scores to help achieve three goals: to inform the public about a restaurant s inspection results in a simple, accessible way; to improve sanitary conditions and food safety practices in restaurants; and to reduce illnesses associated with dining out. This report summarizes progress toward these goals. Why the Health Department Inspects and Grades Restaurants Research has demonstrated that most bacterial, viral and contaminant-based foodborne illnesses occur because of poor hygiene, improper storage and handling, and inadequate cooling and heating of food. The Health Department requires restaurants to follow food safety rules that are grounded in science and based on federal and state guidelines and laws. The most important rules require restaurant workers to: Wash hands before touching food Keep cold food cold and hot food hot to stop the growth of dangerous bacteria Avoid cross-contamination by preventing contact between raw meats like beef, poultry and fish and food that will not be cooked Prevent infestations of mice, filth flies, roaches and other pests by maintaining clean spaces, sealing holes and cracks, and using properly licensed and trained exterminators Prepare food on surfaces that are made of appropriate material and are well maintained so that toxic chemicals, mold and other harmful substances do not touch food Have a supervisor trained in food protection present at all times to oversee operations When a restaurant fails to follow these and other basic food safety practices, patrons are more likely to become sick. New Yorkers eat at restaurants nearly a billion times each year. While most do not get sick, foodborne bacteria, viruses and other contaminants cause millions of cases of illness each year. We estimate that more than 6,000 New Yorkers are hospitalized and 20,000 visit emergency rooms each year because of foodborne illnesses. Each year, the City receives approximately 2,700 complaints about restaurant-acquired foodborne illnesses many involving more than one person and another 3,000 complaints about restaurant hygiene. Research in New York City and elsewhere has shown that restaurants with poorer inspection results are more likely to be associated with outbreaks of illness. The Health Department compared inspections at restaurants where a foodborne illness outbreak was investigated to those citywide and found that restaurants where outbreaks had occurred score, on average, nine more points on recent inspections than those without outbreaks. Before letter grading, restaurants were motivated to practice food safety by their own desire to maintain healthful conditions and by the threat of fines for violations found at the time of inspection. Grading introduced a third and potentially more significant incentive: recognition with an A grade for excellent food safety practices. How the Grading System Works In the letter-grading program, restaurant inspection results are summarized by grades of A, B or C. The program uses dual inspections to help restaurants improve their food-safety practices before they are graded. If a restaurant does not earn an A on its first inspection (called an initial inspection ), the Health Department does not issue a grade. Instead, it conducts a second inspection (called a re-inspection ) approximately a month later and issues a grade based on this

re-inspection. This series of inspections is called a cycle. Each health code violation results in points; total points are a restaurant s inspection score. Restaurants with 0 to 13 points earn A grades, 14 to 27 points earn Bs and 28 or more points get Cs. Restaurants that score in the B or C range on their initial inspection begin a new cycle of inspections sooner. Those earning 0 to 13 points on their initial inspection start a new cycle in approximately 12 months, while those scoring 14 to 27 or 28 or more points begin a new cycle in approximately six months and four months, respectively. More New Yorkers See and Use Grades When They Eat Out In late January and early February 2012, Baruch College Survey Research conducted the second survey of New Yorkers as part of a comprehensive evaluation of restaurant grading. The survey consisted of a random sample of 511 adult New Yorkers contacted by telephone. Among New York City adults, 81 percent report seeing the letter grades in restaurant windows, and 88 percent consider the grades in their dining decisions. As many as 70 percent of New Yorkers express concern about getting sick from eating out in restaurants, delis and coffee shops, with 38 percent being very concerned (Figure 1). Figure 1 The presence of grades in windows provides diners a measure of reassurance. Seeing an A in the window of a restaurant makes 76 percent of New Yorkers feel more confident about the safety of eating at that restaurant. Many believe the Health Department inspects restaurants more frequently than it does (21 percent believe that restaurants are inspected four or more times per year), and 88 percent approve of the Department inspecting poorly performing restaurants more frequently. 2

Grading Has Led to Significant Improvements in Restaurant Sanitary Practices Fewer Restaurants Have Violations Associated with Foodborne Illnesses To gauge the overall progress in the grading program, the Health Department assessed the change over time in the percent of all restaurants with specific violations on initial unannounced inspections (Figure 2). We found that many key violations were less prevalent at 18 months than in the year prior to grading. For instance: Figure 2 The percent of restaurants without a trained food protection supervisor on site has decreased from 13 percent before the program to 7 percent today. Restaurants without trained supervisors on duty are far more likely to have other sanitary and food practice violations. Restaurants are more likely to hold hot and cold food at safe temperatures since grading began. While 22 percent of restaurants still have signs of mice on initial inspection, this is a nearly one third improvement since before grading began, when 32 percent of restaurants had mice. Only 5 percent of initial inspections found inadequate hand washing facilities, compared with 11 percent prior to grading. Not all areas saw improvement, however. Inspections noting dirty food preparation surfaces increased slightly, from 18 percent before grading to 20 percent since grading began. 3

More Restaurants Earn A Grades on Initial Inspections, Require Less Frequent Inspections and Avoid Fines The proportion of restaurants earning A grades on their initial inspections has steadily risen over the last 18 months (Figure 3). As of January 2012, 41 percent of all initial inspections resulted in an A grade, up from 27 percent in the first six months of grading and 35 percent after a year. As a result, these restaurants will be inspected again in 12 months rather than sooner. Figure 3 The number of restaurants that are inspected more frequently has fallen as well. As of January 2012, just 25 percent of restaurants were on a schedule to be inspected three times a year, down from 32 percent six months ago. Because of improved sanitary conditions in restaurants, more restaurants pay no fines. In addition, in January 2011 the Health Department instituted a policy of not assessing fines for any restaurant earning an A on initial or re-inspection. As a result of the policy change and improved inspection results, 41 percent of restaurants will pay no fines this year, up from 19 percent in the year before grading began. Restaurants Are Earning Better Grades through the Inspection Cycle Diners across the city have more A-grade restaurants to choose from than they did six months ago and many more than a year ago. As of January 2012, 72 percent of restaurants were posting A grades, up from 69 percent in July 2011 and 65 percent in January 2011 (Figure 4). 4

Figure 4 Salmonella Infections Have Declined Since Letter Grading Was Implemented When restaurants use good food safety practices, diners are safer. Early signs suggest that the combination of letter grade posting and more frequent inspections at restaurants posing the greatest risk to the public may be leading to a reduction in foodborne illnesses. The annual number of infections caused by Salmonella bacteria is a common and useful indicator of trends in food-related illnesses because they occur relatively frequently and because approximately 95 percent of these infections are believed to be caused by eating contaminated food. By law, laboratories must report Salmonella cases to the New York State and City Health Departments. In 2011, the first full year since grading took effect, reported cases of Salmonella infections fell by 175 cases, a 14 percent decline from the previous year, to a level lower than that seen in New York City for at least 20 years. No decrease approached this magnitude in the rest of the state, Connecticut or New Jersey in 2011 (Figure 5). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that for every reported case of Salmonella, an additional 28 cases are not diagnosed because ill people do not seek medical care or physicians do not test them for Salmonella. Using this formula, the decline in cases in New York City from 2010 to 2011 represents a reduction of an estimated 5,075 cases of Salmonella infections. 5

Figure 5 More Progress in Food Safety Practices is Necessary to Further Protect New Yorkers Restaurant sanitary practices have improved citywide since the start of the grading program. But some restaurants need to make further improvements to meet the high standards set by an A grade. Inspections still: Find evidence of mice in 22 percent of city restaurants Measure cold food at excessively warm temperatures in 27 percent of restaurants Uncover the potential for cross-contamination of food by contact with raw ingredients such as poultry and other meats in 11 percent of restaurants Observe food being prepared on dirty or greasy surfaces 20 percent of the time The Health Department expects that, over time, with an A grade as incentive and more frequent inspections to monitor and educate poorer-performing restaurant operators, these conditions will continue to improve and rates of foodborne illnesses will continue to decline, making dining out cleaner and safer. 6