Canadian Wheat Quality - 2014 Crop CWRS and CWAD



Similar documents
Pasta Technology. Introduction to Pasta Technology. Bühler AG Ali Kocak Process Engineer

Quality of Western2015 Canadian malting barley

End-use Quality of Bulgarian Durum Wheat

Recent Trends in Durum Wheat Milling and Pasta Processing: Impact on Durum Wheat Quality Requirements

Mulino Marino Flour & Getting The Most From Them

Wheat quality and markets in Queensland

Syllabus M.Tech. Food Technology DSC- FT- 1 A: FUNDAMENTALS OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PART I

Domestic Wheat and Feed Grain

IDŐJÁRÁS Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service Vol. 116, No. 3, July September 2012, pp

FHT Flour Heat Treatment.

Yeast bread outline. Yeast. Functions of other yeast bread ingredients Yeast bread cookery Spoilage of baked goods. Compressed Dry active

Polymatik Press. Pasta. Top pasta quality thanks to innovative press technology.

Guide to Cereals in the UK

RESEARCHES REGARDING THE CHEMICAL LEAVENING AGENTS ROLE IN QUALITY OF BAKERY PRODUCTS. Abstract

The Effect of Whole Wheat Flour on Banana Bread

Guide to Cereals. in the UK

Canadian Grain Commission

21 Chinese Steamed Bread G.G. Hou and L. Popper

International Pasta Organization

CORN BY-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY COW RATIONS

Technological handbook of methods

Comparing Plant and Animal Cells

Choosing Wheat To Eat

FENACAM 14 Programação Técnica -VIII Simpósio Internacional de Aquicultura DE NOVEMBRO DE 2014

Effect of corn silage kernel processing score on dairy cow starch digestibility

Global Trends in Malting Barley, Malt and Beer. Peter Watts Managing Director Canadian Malting Barley Technical Centre January 12, 2016

Process of producing sweetpotato flour

BEFOR.E YOU START INGREDIENTS 11/2 LB LOAF TEMPERATIJRE ALTITUDE FLOUR GLUTEN

ICE BARLEY FUTURES & OPTIONS. April IntercontinentalExchange ICE Futures Canada ICE Clear Canada

Producers of wheat are estimated to be between approximately to

CANADA: OUTLOOK FOR PRINCIPAL FIELD CROPS July 22, 2014

Utilization of Lard to Replace Margarine in the Short and Layer Crust Pastry with Filling

ELIANE. The New Waxy Potato Starch of AVEBE Detmold, 2006

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

Alveography in Quality Assessment of Soft White Winter Wheat Cultivars

Decision Document E92-02

Agrisoma: Creating Sustainable Energy Solutions Founded in Agriculture

The Ultimate Guide to Pigeon Feed

1) The rush of energy given by high GI foods does not last and is soon followed by an energy lull. So you get hungry and want to eat more.

Graphing Cereal. Skills: Science and Math P.A.S.S. Objective: Students gather and graph information about favorite.

Analysis of through-chain pricing of food products (Summary version) Freshlogic 24 August 2012

Fit With Fiber Graphing Cereal

WHOLE GRAINS FOR GOOD HEALTH

Effect of the addition of extruded wheat flours on dough rheology. and bread quality

Grains and Oilseeds Outlook

New Processes for New Products. Impact of protein modification designed functionalities as food ingredients

Danseed - Seed drying sensors

Chlorinated polyethylene ELASLEN TM. Application for Wire and Cable

Nutritional Value of Peas, Lentils & Chickpeas

Culinary Arts Program Syllabus

20 Wheat Flour Products in North America J.A. Gwirtz, M.R. Willyard and K.L. McFall

TEZA DE DOCTORAT Mariana POPA SUMMARY

8161,QWHUQDWLRQDO 7UDGH &RPPLVVLRQ

- 1 - The Canadian flax industry has a strong visual grading system designed to ensure uniform quality.

Flocking of textiles. Flocked shirt 13. flocking drying cleaning. adhesive. application. creation

AGREX - Durum Wheat Futures

Land Use/Land Cover Map of the Central Facility of ARM in the Southern Great Plains Site Using DOE s Multi-Spectral Thermal Imager Satellite Images

Animal Science Research Centre - Beef Unit Trial Results 2005 (a) Evaluation of head-cut whole crop wheat and barley for beef cattle

EBROFOODS BUSINESS MODEL

Glyphosate Levels in Breakfast Foods: What is safe?

Harvesting, Drying, and Storing Malting Barley

HIGH FIBER DIET. (Article - Web Site) August 20, 2003

Few foods can claim to play such a prominent part of the staple diet in so

UTI CAT FOOD COMPARISON CHART

4 - H S U P P L E M E N T A L M AT E R I A L EM4748 JUDGING BAKED PRODUCTS

INTRODUCTION. The identification system of dairy cattle; The recording of production of dairy cattle; Laboratory analysis; Data processing.

Federal Crop Insurance RISK MANAGEMENT. Chris Eddy Dell s Insurance Agency

L 202/50 Official Journal of the European Union DECISIONS COUNCIL

Front face fluorescence analysis to monitor food process contaminants

Preparing Yeast Breads

Food Sources of Fibre

Application Centre. Bühler Bangalore.

Roller bearing life. The Reaction of AISI Bearing Steel to Heat

To complete the organization for all agricultural activities MARO has daughter companies such as

Phosphorus use efficiency, grain yield, and quality of triticale and durum wheat under irrigated conditions

gloser og kommentarer til Macbeth ( sidetal henviser til "Illustrated Shakespeare") GS 96

How To Use Lactose In Confectionery

Pastificio Columbro VESUNA BIO LINE - Italfood OST - INTERNATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ITALIAN Monday, 16 April :01. Kamut Spaghetti 1 / 425

AGT Food and Ingredients Inc. - Strategic Overview (TSX: AGT) May 2016

Management of Variety Collections. Experience in Germany

FIBER IN YOUR DIET WHAT IS FIBER?

CODEX STANDARD FOR RICE

Production of Novel Rice Flour Fractions

Private Sewage System Design Document Example/Template Open Discharge PREFACE

Feeding Value of Sprouted Grains

Patty Case, M.S., R.D. Oregon State University Extension Service Klamath County November 4, 2008

7 Australian Wheat AWB Global Technical Services group

Improving mycotoxins measurements by combining rapid analysis with dust sampling

Moringa Oleifera a Multipurpose Tree:

Transcription:

Wheat from Western Canada QUALITY PLUS Canadian Wheat Quality - 2014 Crop CWRS and CWAD Grain Research Laboratory Canadian New Crop Missions Wheat from Western Canada QUALITY PLUS

CWRS Protein Content: 1927 to 2014 Protein content, % (N x 5.7) 16 15 14 13 12 88-year mean 13.6% 11 1925 1945 1965 1985 2005 Year 2

2014 CWRS: wheat protein distribuoon 40 35 30 2013 2014 % 25 20 15 10 5 0 3 < 12% 12-12.9% 13-13.9% 14-14.9% >15% Protein Band

2014 CWRS: Western and Eastern Prairies Western Prairies Eastern Prairies 4 No overall prairie composites

2014 CWRS: composites by grade and protein Grade Western Prairies Eastern Prairies No. 1 CWRS 13.5 12.5 13.5 12.5 (N/A) No. 2 CWRS 13.5 12.5 13.5 12.5 No. 3 CWRS No protein segregapon No protein segregapon 5

2014 CWRS Composites: Laboratory Milling Buhler laboratory mill Replaces Allis- Chalmers Standardized extracoon rates Allows direct comparison Controlled straight grade at 74% For all composites Patent at 60% No.1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 only 2013 Composites Re- milled with Buhler for comparison 6

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies 7

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Wheat AnalyOcal Results Wheat Tests 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Test weight, kg/hl 82.4 79.5 83.2 81.8 1000 Kernel wt, g 36.0 34.0 36.8 34.9 Protein, % 13.8 13.7 13.7 13.7 Ash, % 1.42 1.57 1.58 1.62 Falling Number, s 380 410 435 435 DON, ppm <0.05 0.17 8

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Milling Yields Buhler Lab Mill Flour Yield 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Clean wheat basis, % 74.8 74.8 74.9 75.2 0.50% ash basis, % 79.3 77.8 77.9 78.7 9

Flour Tests No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Flour analysis 74% 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Protein, % 13.1 13.1 13.0 12.9 Wet Gluten, % 36.5 35.6 37.3 36.9 Ash, % 0.41 0.44 0.44 0.43 Starch damage, % 7.6 6.9 8.0 7.7 Amylograph peak viscosity, BU 605 540 675 600 10

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Flour analysis 60% Flour Tests 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Protein, % 13.0 12.8 12.9 12.8 Wet Gluten, % 36.5 36.2 37.3 36.7 Ash, % 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.40 Starch damage, % 7.5 6.8 7.8 7.8 Amylograph peak viscosity, BU 665 575 700 635 11

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Farinograph 74% Farinograph 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 64.5 63.4 66.1 65.7 Development time, min 6.75 7.25 6.25 5.50 MTI, BU 20 25 35 25 Stability, min 11.5 10.5 7.0 8.0 12

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Farinograph 74% No. 1 No. 2 2014 2013 13

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Farinograph 60% Farinograph 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 64.4 63.0 65.7 65.5 Development time, min 7.00 8.00 6.75 6.00 MTI, BU 15 25 20 20 Stability, min 18.0 17.0 13.0 11.0 14

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Farinograph 60% No. 1 No. 2 2014 2013 15

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Extensograph 74% Extensograph Maximum Resistance, BU 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 536 496 405 387 Extensibility, cm 22.0 21.3 21.8 22.0 Area, cm 3 148 136 115 110 16

No. 1 No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Extensograph 74% No. 2 17 2014 2013

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Extensograph 60% Extensograph Maximum Resistance, BU 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 599 554 440 427 Extensibility, cm 21.7 22.2 21.9 21.6 Area, cm 3 161 155 124 118 18

No. 1 No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies Extensograph 60% No. 2 2014 2013 19

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies CSP Baking Quality 74% CSP Baking 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 69 67 70 70 Mixing time, min 5.0 4.6 4.0 4.1 Mixing energy, Whr/kg 12.7 11.6 10.1 11.1 Loaf volume, cm 3 995 1010 995 990 20

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies CSP Baking Quality 74% No.1 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 69% Mixing Time 5.0 min Mixing Energy 12.7 W- h/kg No.2 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 67% Mixing Time 4.6 min Mixing Energy 11.6 W- h/kg 995 cc 1010 cc 21

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies CSP Baking Quality 60% CSP Baking 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 68 67 70 70 Mixing time, min 5.0 5.1 4.5 4.0 Mixing energy, Whr/kg 13.1 13.9 12.2 10.0 Loaf volume, cm 3 1025 1030 980 1050 22

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies CSP Baking Quality 60% No.1 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 68% Mixing Time 5.0 min Mixing Energy 13.1 W- h/kg No.2 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 67% Mixing Time 5.1 min Mixing Energy 13.9 W- h/kg 1025 cc 1030 cc

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies S&D Baking Quality 60% CSP Baking 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 64 63 66 65 Mixing time, min 3.8 3.9 3.4 3.0 Mixing energy, Whr/kg 8.0 8.3 6.5 5.5 Loaf volume, cm 3 1070 1045 1070 1015 24

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Western Prairies S&D Baking Quality 60% No.1 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 64% Mixing Time 3.8 min Mixing Energy 8.0 W- h/kg No.2 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 63% Mixing Time 3.9 min Mixing Energy 8.3 W- h/kg 1070 cc 1045 cc

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies 26

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Wheat AnalyOcal Results Wheat Tests 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Test weight, kg/hl 81.5 81.0 83.2 81.8 1000 Kernel wt, g 31.8 32.3 36.8 34.9 Protein, % 13.9 13.8 13.7 13.7 Ash, % 1.63 1.61 1.58 1.62 Falling Number, s 420 400 435 435 DON, ppm 0.09 0.34 27

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Milling Yields Buhler Lab Mill Flour Yield 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Clean wheat basis, % 75.4 74.3 74.9 75.2 0.50% ash basis, % 77.4 77.3 77.9 78.7 28

Flour Tests No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Flour analysis 74% 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Protein, % 13.1 12.8 13.0 12.9 Wet Gluten, % 36.0 35.0 37.3 36.9 Ash, % 0.46 0.44 0.44 0.43 Starch damage, % 8.0 7.4 8.0 7.7 Amylograph peak viscosity, BU 730 555 675 600 29

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Flour analysis 60% Flour Tests 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Protein, % 12.9 12.6 12.9 12.8 Wet Gluten, % 36.2 34.4 37.3 36.7 Ash, % 0.41 0.41 0.38 0.40 Starch damage, % 7.8 7.3 7.8 7.8 Amylograph peak viscosity, BU 750 580 700 635 30

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Farinograph 74% Farinograph 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 64.5 63.4 66.1 65.7 Development time, min 5.50 6.50 6.25 5.50 MTI, BU 30 35 35 25 Stability, min 8.5 8.0 7.0 8.0 31

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Farinograph 74% No. 1 No. 2 2014 2013 32

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Farinograph 60% Farinograph 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 63.9 62.7 65.7 65.5 Development time, min 5.50 6.75 6.75 6.00 MTI, BU 20 25 20 20 Stability, min 10.5 10.0 13.0 11.0 33

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Farinograph 60% No. 1 No. 2 2014 2013 34

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Extensograph 74% Extensograph Maximum Resistance, BU 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 396 422 405 387 Extensibility, cm 22.1 21.9 21.8 22.0 Area, cm 3 113 120 115 110 35

No. 1 No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Extensograph 74% No. 2 2014 2013 36

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Extensograph 60% Extensograph Maximum Resistance, BU 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 457 510 440 427 Extensibility, cm 20.3 22.4 21.9 21.6 Area, cm 3 117 146 124 118 37

No. 1 No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies Extensograph 60% No. 2 38 2014 2013

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies CSP Baking Quality 74% CSP Baking 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 69 67 70 70 Mixing time, min 4.8 4.7 4.0 4.1 Mixing energy, Whr/kg 11.5 11.7 10.1 11.1 Loaf volume, cm 3 985 1010 995 990 39

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies CSP Baking Quality 74% No.1 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 69% Mixing Time 4.8 min Mixing Energy 11.5 W- h/kg No.2 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 67% Mixing Time 4.7 min Mixing Energy 11.7 W- h/kg 985 cc 1010 cc

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies CSP Baking Quality 60% CSP Baking 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 68 67 70 70 Mixing time, min 4.8 5.3 4.5 4.0 Mixing energy, Whr/kg 12.7 14.5 12.2 10.0 Loaf volume, cm 3 1010 1000 980 1050 41

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies CSP Baking Quality 60% No.1 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 68% Mixing Time 4.8 min Mixing Energy 12.7 W- h/kg No.2 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 67% Mixing Time 5.3 min Mixing Energy 14.5 W- h/kg 1010 cc 1000 cc

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies S&D Baking Quality 60% CSP Baking 2014 2013 No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 64 63 66 65 Mixing time, min 4.0 4.1 3.4 3.0 Mixing energy, Whr/kg 8.2 8.1 6.5 5.5 Loaf volume, cm 3 990 990 1070 1015 43

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 13.5 Eastern Prairies S&D Baking Quality 60% No.1 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 64% Mixing Time 4.0 min Mixing Energy 8.2 W- h/kg No.2 CWRS 13.5 Bake AbsorpPon 63% Mixing Time 4.1 min Mixing Energy 8.1 W- h/kg 990 cc 990 cc 44

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western and Eastern Prairies 45

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western & Eastern Prairies Wheat AnalyOcal Results 2014 2013 Wheat Tests Western Eastern Prairie Composite No. 1 No.2 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Test weight, kg/hl 82.8 79.9 80.4 83.3 81.8 1000 Kernel wt, g 35.1 33.1 33.2 35.5 36.3 Protein, % 12.7 12.7 12.9 12.8 12.7 Ash, % 1.44 1.56 1.62 1.54 1.57 Falling Number, s 420 410 400 435 435 DON, ppm <0.05 0.10 0.20 46

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western & Eastern Prairies Milling Yields Buhler Lab Mill Flour Yield Western 2014 2013 Eastern Prairie Composite No. 1 No.2 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Clean wheat basis, % 75.1 75.3 75.0 75.0 74.8 0.50% ash basis, % 78.1 78.8 77.5 77.5 78.3 47

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western & Eastern Prairies Flour analysis 74% Flour Tests 2014 2013 Western Eastern Prairie Composite No. 1 No.2 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Protein, % 12.1 12.0 11.9 12.0 11.9 Wet Gluten, % 33.3 32.9 32.4 33.5 33.4 Ash, % 0.44 0.43 0.45 0.45 0.43 Starch damage, % 8.0 7.0 7.6 8.4 7.9 Amylograph peak viscosity, BU 680 570 460 710 600 48

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western & Eastern Prairies Farinograph 74% Farinograph 2014 2013 Western Eastern Prairie Composite No. 1 No.2 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 63.9 62.3 62.6 65.3 64.9 Development time, min 6.50 6.75 5.00 5.50 5.50 MTI, BU 30 30 30 35 30 Stability, min 10.0 10.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 49

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western Prairies Farinograph 74% No. 1 No. 2 2014 2013 50

No. 2 CWRS 12.5 Eastern Prairies Farinograph 74% No. 2 2014 2013 51

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western & Eastern Prairies Extensograph 74% Extensograph Maximum Resistance, BU Western 2014 2013 Eastern Prairie Composite No. 1 No.2 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 559 519 393 445 367 Extensibility, cm 18.9 19.9 22.2 19.9 20.8 Area, cm 2 129 132 113 112 98 52

No. 1 No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western Prairies Extensograph 74% No. 2 53 2014 2013

No. 2 CWRS 12.5 Eastern Prairies Extensograph 74% No. 2 2014 2013 54

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western & Eastern Prairies CSP Baking Quality 74% CSP Baking 2014 2013 Western Eastern Prairie Composite No. 1 No.2 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 68 66 67 69 69 Mixing time, min 5.0 4.8 5.4 4.0 4.1 Mixing energy, Whr/ kg 12.2 11.9 14.3 9.6 9.8 Loaf volume, cm 2 995 1010 1000 990 1015 55

No. 1 & 2 CWRS 12.5 Western Prairies CSP Baking Quality 74% No.1 CWRS 12.5 Bake AbsorpPon 68% Mixing Time 5.0 min Mixing Energy 12.2 W- h/kg No. 2 CWRS 12.5 Bake AbsorpPon 66% Mixing Time 4.8 min Mixing Energy 11.9 W- h/kg 995 cc 1010 cc 56

No. 2 CWRS 12.5 Eastern Prairies CSP Baking Quality 74% Bake AbsorpPon 67% Mixing Time 5.4 min Mixing Energy 14.3 W- h/kg 1000 cc 57

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies 58

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies Wheat AnalyOcal Results Wheat Tests 2014 2013 Western Eastern Overall Test weight, kg/hl 78.4 79.7 81.1 1000 Kernel wt, g 33.2 33.1 35.7 Protein, % 13.6 13.6 13.4 Ash, % 1.57 1.59 1.60 Falling Number, s 395 390 405 DON, ppm 0.15 0.40 59

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies Milling Yields Buhler Lab Mill Flour Yield 2014 2013 Western Eastern Overall Clean wheat basis, % 75.0 74.6 74.8 0.50% ash basis, % 77.5 77.1 77.3 60

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies Flour analysis 74% Flour Tests 2014 2013 Western Eastern Overall Protein, % 12.8 12.6 12.5 Wet Gluten, % 34.8 33.9 35.6 Ash, % 0.45 0.45 0.45 Starch damage, % 7.0 7.7 7.6 Amylograph peak viscosity, BU 405 390 475 61

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies Farinograph 74% Farinograph 2014 2013 Western Eastern Overall Absorption, % 63.0 63.3 65.3 Development time, min 6.50 5.25 5.25 MTI, BU 30 35 30 Stability, min 8.5 7.5 7.5 62

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies Farinograph 74% Western Eastern 2013 2014 63

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies Extensograph 74% Extensograph Maximum Resistance, BU 2014 2013 Western Eastern Overall 464 399 323 Extensibility, cm 21.3 24.2 21.4 Area, cm 3 129 128 93 64

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies Extensograph 74% Western Eastern 2013 65 2014

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies CSP Baking Quality 74% CSP Baking 2014 2013 Western Eastern Overall Absorption, % 67 67 69 Mixing time, min 4.5 4.9 3.8 Mixing energy, Whr/kg 11.4 13.2 9.6 Loaf volume, cm 3 1010 1000 990 66

No. 3 CWRS Western & Eastern Prairies CSP Baking Quality 74% Western Prairies Bake AbsorpPon 67% Mixing Time 4.5 min Mixing Energy 11.4 W- h/kg Eastern Prairies Bake AbsorpPon 67% Mixing Time 4.9 min Mixing Energy 13.2 W- h/kg 1010 cc 1000 cc 67

Quality of 2014 CWRS - Summary Dough Strength Significantly stronger for all composites from Western Prairies Slightly stronger for most composites from Eastern Prairies Lower water absorppon (~1.5 2.5%), but normal Soundness Slightly lower Falling Number and Amylo. peak viscosity Milling performance Similar to 2013, no significant differences among grades Baking quality Longer mixing Pme, higher energy input for most composites Lower water absorppon Similar loaf volume 68

CWRS Main VarieOes Grown in 2014 Overall AB SK MB CARBERRY 11 3 7 35 HARVEST 11 14 6 15 STETTLER 9 24 1 - CDC UTMOST 8 3 14 2 LILLIAN 7 8 10 - CDC GO 7 16 1 2 CDC STANLEY 5 5 5 3 UNITY 4-9 - SHAW 4-8 - GLENN 4-3 12 Based on informapon provided by provincial crop insurance 69

Dough Strength of Major CWRS VarieOes - Results of Coop trials VarieOes Coop Trials Stability, min Stability of Checks Harvest (à â ) Lillian (â ) Unity (â ) Kane (â ) 1998-2000 Central bread 2000-2002 Western Bread 2004-2006 Central Bread 2003-2005 Central Bread 7.5 11.0 8.5 8.5 17.0 Roblin 9.5 AC Barrie 6.5 Neepawa 17.0 Laura 11.5 AC Barrie 8.5 Katepwa 16.5 CDC Teal 13.5 AC Barrie 9.0 Katepwa 16.5 CDC Teal 10.5 AC Barrie 8.0 Katepwa 70

Dough Strength of Major CWRS VarieOes VarieOes Coop Trials Stability, min Stability of Checks Carberry (à á ) Steiler (á ) CDC Utmost (á ) CDC Stanley (à ) CDC Go (à ) Glenn (â ) 2006-2008 Western Bread 2005-2007 Western Bread 2006-2008 Western Bread 2006-2008 Western Bread 2000-2002 Western Bread 2006-2008 Central Bread 14.0 13.5 17.5 23.0 18.5 25.0 23.0 Laura 17.0 AC Barrie 11.0 Katepwa 24.0 Laura 15.0 AC Barrie 10.0 Katepwa 23.0 Laura 16.5 AC Barrie 10.5 Katepwa 23.0 Laura 16.5 AC Barrie 10.5 Katepwa 17.0 Laura 11.0 AC Barrie 8.5 Katepwa 24.0 CDC Teal - - - - - - 12.0 Katepwa 71

Wheat Quality Assurance by the CGC Variety DesignaOon lists CGC maintains class designaoon lists under the CGA Eligible registered variepes have to be proven to conform to the quality model established for the class Line RecommendaOon PRCWRT Variety RegistraOon CFIA Class DesignaOon CGC Agrono my Diseas e Quality Vote of Quality EvaluaOon Team is the key for class eligibility 72

No. 1 & 2 CPSR 73

No. 1 & 2 CPSR Wheat AnalyOcal Results Wheat Tests 2014 No. 1 No. 2 Test weight, kg/hl 81.2 78.7 1000 Kernel wt, g 42.5 38.7 Protein, % 12.1 11.8 Ash, % 1.41 1.47 Falling Number, s 380 380 DON, ppm 0.11 <0.05 74

No. 1 & 2 CPSR Milling Yields Buhler Lab Mill Flour Yield 2014 No. 1 No. 2 Clean wheat basis, % 75.2 76.0 0.50% ash basis, % 78.7 78.0 75

Flour Tests No. 1 & 2 CPSR Flour analysis 74% 2014 No. 1 No. 2 Protein, % 11.2 11.0 Wet Gluten, % 29.7 29.1 Ash, % 0.43 0.46 Starch damage, % 6.6 6.3 Amylograph peak viscosity, BU 725 515 76

No. 1 & 2 CPSR Farinograph 74% Farinograph 2014 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 60.7 60.1 Development time, min 7.5 6.5 MTI, BU 30 35 Stability, min 10.0 7.5 77

No. 1 & 2 CPSR Farinograph 74% No. 1 No. 2 78

No. 1 & 2 CPSR Extensograph 74% Extensograph Maximum Resistance, BU 2014 No. 1 No. 2 647 500 Extensibility, cm 22.8 21.4 Area, cm 3 185 137 79

No. 1 & 2 CPSR Extensograph 74% No. 1 No. 2 80

No. 1 & 2 CPSR CSP Baking Quality 74% CSP Baking 2014 No. 1 No. 2 Absorption, % 65 64 Mixing time, min 5.5 5.7 Mixing energy, Whr/kg 13.8 15.3 Loaf volume, cm 3 920 900 81

No. 1 & 2 CPSR CSP Baking Quality 74% No.1 CPSR Bake AbsorpPon 65% Mixing Time 5.5 min Mixing Energy 13.8 W- h/kg No. 2 CPSR Bake AbsorpPon 64% Mixing Time 5.7 min Mixing Energy 15.3 W- h/kg 920 cc 900 cc

No. 2, 3, and 4 CWAD 83

Protein Content: CWAD by Grade and Year Grade 2014 2013 Mean 2009-2013 No. 1 CWAD N/A 11.8 12.4 No. 2 CWAD 13.0 11.6 12.4 No. 3 CWAD 13.0 12.2 12.8 No. 4 CWAD 12.3 11.5 12.4 All milling grades 12.9 11.9 12.6 84

CWAD Protein Content: 1963 to 2014 Protein content, % (N x 5.7) 16 15 14 13 12 52-year mean 13.2% 11 1963 1973 1983 1993 2003 2013 Year 85

CWAD Overall Composites No. 2 CWAD: 99 No. 3 CWAD: 348 No. 4 CWAD: 224 100 86

CWAD Wheat CharacterisOcs Quality Parameter No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 2014 2013 2014 2013 2013 2012 Test weight, kg/hl 80.4 83.1 79.6 81.8 83.1 82.4 1000 Kernel weight, g 36.2 47.9 39.3 44.4 40.4 45.4 Vitreous kernels, % 85 79 60 78 52 36 DON, ppm < 0.05 <0.05 0.17 0.51 0.12 0.08 Cadmium, ppb 62 66 60 61 66 73 87

CWAD Wheat analyocal results Quality Parameter No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 Protein, % 12.9 11.4 12.9 12.0 12.3 11.5 Ash, % 1.55 1.53 1.60 1.59 1.56 1.57 Falling number, sec 550 455 260 440 180 385 88

CWAD Milling Quality Quality Parameters No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 Total milling yield, % 75.1 75.5 74.2 75.2 73.4 75.2 Semolina yield, % 66.0 67.4 64.9 66.3 63.5 65.5 Speck count, /50cm 2 Total 27 22 30 27 30 24 Dark 4 5 7 5 4 4 Large 11 10 13 14 14 14 89

CWAD Semolina Protein Content and Gluten Strength Quality Parameter No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 Protein, % 12.0 10.5 12.1 11.1 11.2 10.6 Wet gluten, % 29.8 26.6 30.2 28.3 28.8 27.8 Gluten Index, % 87 69 85 62 82 68 Alveogram P, (ht x 1.1), mm 71 67 70 65 63 58 L, mm 96 79 86 81 88 87 W, J x 10-4 206 159 192 157 172 149 90

CWAD Semolina Ash & Colour Quality Parameter No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 Semolina ash, % 0.70 0.65 0.69 0.67 0.69 0.67 Yellowness, b* 32.2 32.3 30.8 32.0 30.0 30.7 Yellow pigment, ppm 10.3 9.5 9.8 9.6 9.5 9.6 91

CWAD Spaghek Colour dried at 85 o C Quality parameter No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 Spaghetti colour Brightness, L* 72.5 74.2 72.5 73.8 72.5 73.8 Redness, a* 4.0 3.2 4.0 3.7 4.3 3.5 Yellowness, b* 63.2 64.5 63.0 63.1 62.7 63.2 92

CWAD Spaghek Texture Quality parameter No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 Cutting force, g peak 603 505 598 531 530 498 Strand diameter (mm) Dry 1.67 1.66 1.66 1.67 1.66 1.66 Cooked 2.42 2.43 2.43 2.43 2.42 2.42 93

Effects of Sprout Damage on Spaghek Appearance No. 1 CWAD 85:1 5 75:2 5 50:5 0 No. 5 CWAD FN: 479 FN: 204 FN: 152 FN: 101 FN: 68 Fu et al., 2014, Can. J. Plant Sci. 94:1-9.

Sprout Damage In absence of severe weathering As long as FN > 200-250 sec., sprout damage has liile influence on durum wheat milling performance and pasta processing quality With FN 100-200 sec., the effect of sprout damage was mainly limited to semolina speck count and pasta colour Associated with more redness (increased reducing sugar levels lead to more Maillard reacpon for HT or UHT drying) 95

Quality of 2014 CWAD - Summary Lower kernel weight and test weight Lower Falling Number for No. 3 & No. 4 Lower semolina yield (~ 1.5%) Slightly higher ash content Higher protein content (~ 1.0%) Stronger gluten Similar spaghel yellowness, but slightly less bright Firmer texture for cooked spaghel 96

CWAD Main VarieOes Grown in 2014 Varieties 2014 2013 Strongfield â 45 63 CDC Verona à 17 14 Brigade á 17 5 Transcend á 9 1 97

Quality CharacterisOcs of New VarieOes CDC Verona ProperOes CDC Verona Strongfield AC Avonlea Wheat protein, % semo. yield, % 14.2 66.2 14.0 65.4 13.9 66.1 Semolina ash, % pigment, ppm 0.66 9.4 0.61 8.8 0.62 8.2 Pasta Colour b* (90 o C) a* (90 o C) 66.9 6.7 64.1 5.8 64.9 5.7 Gluten strength gluten index, % W, ergs P/L 56 219 0.74 73 237 0.83 28 134 0.49 Source: 2004-2006 durum wheat cooperative test 98

Quality CharacterisOcs of New VarieOes Brigade ProperOes Brigade Strongfield AC Avonlea Wheat protein, % semo. yield, % 13.5 65.3 14.1 65.3 14.0 65.7 Semolina ash, % pigment, ppm 0.65 9.8 0.63 8.8 0.64 8.4 Pasta Colour b* (90 o C) a* (90 o C) 66.7 7.0 63.2 6.2 64.4 5.8 Gluten strength gluten index, % W, ergs P/L 95 317 1.16 75 255 1.05 35 144 0.64 Source: 2005-2007 durum wheat cooperative test 99

Quality CharacterisOcs of New VarieOes Transcend ProperOes Transcend Strongfield AC Avonlea Wheat protein, % semo. yield, % 13.8 66.7 13.7 66.9 13.7 66.7 Semolina ash, % pigment, ppm 0.64 8.8 0.60 8.4 0.62 8.0 Pasta Colour b* (90 o C) a* (90 o C) 63.2 6.5 59.7 5.9 61.1 5.2 Gluten strength gluten index, % W, ergs P/L 62 245 0.88 66 231 1.10 21 135 0.68 Source: 2007-2009 durum wheat cooperative test 100