U.S. MARKET OVERVIEW



Similar documents
U.S. MARKET OVERVIEW

U.S. MARKET OVERVIEW

U.S. MARKET OVERVIEW

U.S. MARKET OVERVIEW

Picture Archiving. and Communication Systems: A Study

Bio-Medical Image Life Cycle Management (BILM) A Market Analysis

MARKET OVERVIEW. Hospital Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) Applications 2008 Year End Report HIMSS Analytics

HIMSS Analytics Europe Database. Sample Hospital 1 Unique ID# Hospital Profile. Name of Hospital. Background Information. Hospital Statistics

Healthcare IT. Stan Smits. Analysts Meeting June 15 th, 2005

For sample use only - data from 2006.

Global Healthcare Information Systems Market

Competitive Dynamics in the North American VNA Market. Theo Ahadome Senior Analyst InMedica

Electronic Medical Record in Turkish Hospitals. Findings from the Public Sector

Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) - Global Opportunity Assessment, Competitive Landscape and Market Forecasts to 2017

Third Edition. Essentials of the U.S. Hospital IT Market

IBM Grid Medical Archive Solution

Healthcare Informatics

Technology Trends and Business Opportunities in the Brazilian PACS Market Executive Summary

(SAMPLE COPY, NOT FOR RESALE)

peer60.com Medical Image Sharing: 2015

Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM) John Rayner Director of Professional Development HIMSS-UK

Achievements & Future Goals

Investor Presentation. December 2013

GE Healthcare. Turn The Page Click on the back or forward arrow icon to move between pages.

MATURITE DES SIH EN EUROPE

Hospital IT Expenses and Budgets Related to Clinical Sophistication. Market Findings from HIMSS Analytics

Next Generation PACS: Design & Architecture (Standards based VNA concepts) November 8, 2010

U.S. Markets for EMR (Electronic Medical Record) Technology

Healthcare IT Market to Electronic Medical Records and Radiology Information Systems to Drive Future Growth

Enterprise imaging unfolds as future direction of PACS

With reimbursements plummeting, leaving

Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) - Global Strategic Business Report

COCIR* position on the certification of Healthcare IT product interoperability

Introducing Agfa HealthCare. Dave Wilson Director, Imaging Informatics Agfa HealthCare Inc., (Canada)

THE BENEFITS OF AN ENTERPRISE IMAGING STRATEGY

Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS): Market Research Report

AHA Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement. Healthcare IT Database Download and Data Licensing

JiveX Medical Archive

The Globalization of Radiology and Workflow Implications

NEMA XR Standard Attributes on CT Equipment Related to Dose Optimization and Management

Global Healthcare Cloud Computing Market

Challenge of FUJIFILM in Medical ICT

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 2013 AHA ANNUAL SURVEY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPLEMENT

Merge Healthcare Cardiology Differentiators. A Merge White Paper

Reforming Health Care Through Information Technology

Status of Electronic Health Records in Missouri Hospitals HIDI SPECIAL REPORT JULY 2012

Erlanger Health System Chattanooga, TN 37403

PACS forges connection to electronic health record

IHE s Contribution to Telecardiology. Nick Gawrit, heartbase Antje Schroeder, Siemens Healthcare Paul Dow, ACC Charles Parisot, GE

Building a Sound Integration Architecture a Challenging Journey at KFSH&RC

2011 Capstone Project

The Importance of IHE Cardiology Profiles. Herman Oosterwijk

GE Healthcare. Size it up. Centricity cardiovascular PACS solution

2014 Imaging Technology Study

Ochsner Medical Center-North Shore

Agfa HealthCare. At a glance

2015 Population Health Study. HIMSS Analytics

IHE Italy Deployment Committee Activity Report

EHR Adoption and Vision for HIM

10,59 00,00 10,59 7,47 6,42 Many Topics 5,34 6,83

Electronic Medical Records vs. Electronic Health Records: Yes, There Is a Difference. A HIMSS Analytics TM White Paper. By Dave Garets and Mike Davis

peer60.com Community Hospital EHR

IMPAX 6 IMPAX 6. Because all PACS are not created equal

Global Electronic Health Records (EHR) Market is Projected to Reach US$30.28 bn by 2023

DC Department of Health Care Finance Health Informa4on Exchange

26% 37% 37% Managing data to comply with federal mandates GRAPH 1 GRAPH 2

NYS Landscape. 9 RHIOs cover state. RHIOs will be interconnected by State Health Information Network of NY (SHIN-NY) - funded by state and CMS

Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) What it is, where we are, and why it is important

- Key geographies covered include the US, Canada, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Japan, China, Australia, India, and Brazil.

Challenges Faced by Australian Radiologists while Working with Conventional Imaging Workflow Solutions

Clinical Engineering and Supply Chain. Mitchell Foldi Director of Healthcare Solutions PartsSource, Inc.

Healthcare Information Technology Market 2020

Delivering Accelerated Results

Case Study: Using Predictive Analytics to Reduce Sepsis Mortality

Transcription:

U.S. MARKET OVERVIEW Hospital Cardiology PACS (CPACS) Applications 2010 Year End Report This historical report of the U.S. hospital market is brought to you as an online resource from the Dorenfest Institute.

C-PACS Applications Summary of Installation (2009/2010) Echocardiology Catheter Laboratory Computerized Tomography Intravascular Ultrasound Nuclear Cardiology 17% 21% 16% 2 15% 19% 27% 31% 27% 31% Echocardiology and catheter laboratory have the highest installation rates among the CPACS applications. All CPACS applications show an increase in installation over the past year of about four percent. 2009 (n=5,235) 2010 (n=5,281)

CPACS Installation Summary By Number of Beds CPACS Contracted or Installed No CPACS/Plans to Purchase No CPACS/No Plans CPACS Services Not Provided 8% 1% 35% 3 23% 18% 14% 19% 1 6% 1% 2% 45% 6 92% 7 8 85% Under 100 Beds (N=2,678) 100 to 199 Beds (N=1,009) 200 to 299 Beds (N=626) 300 to 399 Beds (N=411) 400 to 499 Beds (N=220) 500or More Beds (N=337)

CPACS Installation Summary By Number of Imaging Procedures CPACS Contracted or Installed 49% 84% 9 86% No CPACS/Plans to Purchase No CPACS/ No Plans 3% 11% 14% 46% CPACS Services Not Provided 5% 5% 6% Under 25,000 (N=736) 25,000 to 49,999 (N=64) 50,000 to 99,999 (N=31) 100,000 or More (N=14)

Number of Modalities Installed One Two Three Four 17.61% 18.44% 14.29% 12.69% Among those hospitals that have installed CPACS technology, over 30 percent have installed (or are presently installing) all five CPACS modalities tracked in this report. Conversely, more than 35 percent are implementing between one and three modalities. Five 36.98% N = 1,931

Number of Modalities Installed By Number of Beds None 19% 15% 27% 38% 52% 89% One to Three 8% 27% 28% 35% 33% 33% Four to Five 3% 21% 34% 38% 49% 52% Under 100 Beds (N=2,678 100 to 199 Beds (N=1,009) 200 to 299 Beds (N=626) 300 to 399 Beds (N=411) 400 to 499 Beds (N=220) 500or More Beds (N=337)

Number of Modalities Installed By Number of Imaging Procedures None 3% 11% 14% 46% One to Three 21% 29% 3 32% Four to Five 25% 59% 65% 64% Under 25,000 (N=736) 25,000 to 49,999 (N=64) 50,000 to 99,999 (N=31) 100,000 or More (N=14)

CPACS Applications Summary of Plans (in Not Automated Hospitals) Catheter Laboratory Echocardiology Intravascular Ultrasound 1,814 0.83% 1,885 0.53% 0.29% (2,395) There is low activity for purchasing CPACS applications for the first time. By percent, catheter lab was most frequently identified as a solution to be purchased for the first time. Computerized Tomography 0.25% (2,376) Nuclear Cardiology 0.24% (2,453) Number in white and in parentheses represents number of not automated hospitals. Percent of "Not Automated" Hospitals Planning to Purchase Software

CPACS Applications Summary of Plans (Replacing Current Software) Nuclear Cardiology Echocardiology Catheter Laboratory Computerized Tomography Intravascular Ultrasound 1,013 0.39% 1,638 0.37% 0.31% (1,626) 0.18% (1,090) 0.0 (1,063) Very few hospitals indicated plans to replace their current CPACS software. By percent, replacement of nuclear cardiology is mentioned the most, followed closely by echocardiology. Number in white and parentheses represents number of hospitals with installed or contracted systems Percent of "Not Automated" Hospitals Planning to Purchase Software

CPACS Applications Summary of Plans Catheter Laboratory (n=20) Computerized Tomography (n=8) Echocardiology (n=16) Intravascular Ultrasound (n=7) 25% 25% 38% 75% 75% 63% 10 The majority of the planned purchases across CPACS applications will be first time purchases. Echocardiology and nuclear cardiology have the largest replacement markets. Nuclear Cardiology (n=10) 4 6 Percent of Hospitals with Installed Software - Replacing Percent of Hospitals Planning to Purchase Software for the First Time

Summary of Installations 1,931 of 5,281 hospitals (37 percent) have installed CPACS technology or have signed a contract to install this technology. Catheter laboratory and echocardiology are the most installed modalities at 31 percent each. 1,725 (33 percent) of the hospitals do not provide cardiology services. The average number licensed beds for these hospitals a little over 50. The remaining 1,625 hospitals (31 percent) do not use any of the CPACS technology tracked in this report. N = 5,281

Vendor # of Installations % of Market* PHILIPS HEALTHCARE 569 30.43% GE HEALTHCARE 545 29.14% AGFA HEALTHCARE 303 16.2 MCKESSON 256 13.69% SIEMENS HEALTHCARE 241 12.89% MERGE HEALTHCARE 144 7.7 FUJIFILM MEDICAL SYSTEMS 102 5.45% SCIMAGE, INC. 35 1.87% LUMEDX CORPORATION 35 1.87% EMIX/DR SYSTEMS, INC. 22 1.18% 31 Vendors share the remaining 6.52% of the market. N = 1,870 Hospital Cardiology PACS Top 10 Installed and Contracted Systems * The total percentage may exceed 100 percent due to rounding or some organization may have more than one vendor or one CPACS modalities installed.

Hospital Cardiology PACS Top 10 Installed/Contracted Systems Hospitals Under 100 Beds Vendor # of Installations % of Market* GE HEALTHCARE 72 26.87% PHILIPS HEALTHCARE 58 21.64% AGFA HEALTHCARE 32 11.94% MERGE HEALTHCARE 30 11.19% SIEMENS HEALTHCARE 29 10.82% FUJIFILM MEDICAL SYSTEMS 23 8.58% MCKESSON 22 8.21% CPSI 9 3.36% SCIMAGE, INC. 8 2.99% NOVARAD CORPORATION 6 2.24% 14 Vendor has the remaining 9.33% of the market. * The total percentage may exceed 100 percent due to rounding or some organization may have more than one vendor or one CPACS modalities installed. N = 268

Hospital Cardiology PACS Top 10 Installed/Contracted Systems Hospitals 100-199 Beds Vendor # of Installations % of Market* GE HEALTHCARE 154 32.98% PHILIPS HEALTHCARE 139 29.76% AGFA HEALTHCARE 76 16.27% MCKESSON 58 12.42% SIEMENS HEALTHCARE 52 11.13% MERGE HEALTHCARE 24 5.14% FUJIFILM MEDICAL SYSTEMS 20 4.28% LUMEDX CORPORATION 7 1.5 SCIMAGE, INC. 7 1.5 EMIX/DR SYSTEMS, INC. 6 1.28% 17 Vendors share the remaining 5.78% of the market. * The total percentage may exceed 100 percent due to rounding or some organization may have more than one vendor or one CPACS modalities installed. N = 467

Hospital Cardiology PACS Top 10 Installed/Contracted Systems Hospitals 200-299 Beds Vendor # of Installations % of Market* GE HEALTHCARE 115 29.79% PHILIPS HEALTHCARE 106 27.46% MCKESSON 60 15.54% AGFA HEALTHCARE 58 15.03% SIEMENS HEALTHCARE 56 14.51% MERGE HEALTHCARE 25 6.48% FUJIFILM MEDICAL SYSTEMS 22 5.7 SCIMAGE, INC. 7 1.81% LUMEDX CORPORATION 6 1.55% 2 VENDORS SHARE THE SAME NUMBER OF INSTALLATION AND MARKET SHARE 8 Vendors share the remaining 2.59% of the market. N = 386 8 2.07% * The total percentage may exceed 100 percent due to rounding or some organization may have more than one vendor or one CPACS modalities installed.

Hospital Cardiology PACS Top 10 Installed/Contracted Systems Hospitals 300-399 Beds Vendor # of Installations % of Market* PHILIPS HEALTHCARE 113 38.31% GE HEALTHCARE 77 26.1 MCKESSON 50 16.95% AGFA HEALTHCARE 43 14.58% SIEMENS HEALTHCARE 39 13.22% MERGE HEALTHCARE 21 7.12% FUJIFILM MEDICAL SYSTEMS 10 3.39% LUMEDX CORPORATION 6 2.06% SCIMAGE, INC. 4 1.36% VOLCANO 4 1.36% 8 Vendors share the remaining 2.59% of the market. * The total percentage may exceed 100 percent due to rounding or some organization may have more than one vendor or one CPACS modalities installed. N = 295

Hospital Cardiology PACS Top 10 Installed/Contracted Systems Hospitals 400-499 Beds Vendor # of Installations % of Market* PHILIPS HEALTHCARE 60 34.68% GE HEALTHCARE 39 22.54% MCKESSON 31 17.92% SIEMENS HEALTHCARE 25 14.45% AGFA HEALTHCARE 19 10.98% MERGE HEALTHCARE 19 10.98% FUJIFILM MEDICAL SYSTEMS 11 6.36% LUMEDX CORPORATION 7 4.05% SCIMAGE, INC. 5 2.89% 2 VENDORS SHARE THE SAME NUMBER OF INSTALLATIONS AND MARKET SHARE 9 Vendors share the remaining 6.36% of the market. N = 173 8 4.62% * The total percentage may exceed 100 percent due to rounding or some organization may have more than one vendor or one CPACS modalities installed.

Vendor # of Installations % of Market* PHILIPS HEALTHCARE 93 33.1 GE HEALTHCARE 88 31.32% AGFA HEALTHCARE 75 26.69% SIEMENS HEALTHCARE 40 14.23% MCKESSON 35 12.46% MERGE HEALTHCARE 25 8.9 FUJIFILM MEDICAL SYSTEMS 16 5.69% LUMEDX CORPORATION 7 2.49% SELF-DEVELOPED 5 1.78% SCIMAGE, INC. 4 1.42% N = 281 Hospital Cardiology PACS Top 10 Installed/Contracted Systems Hospitals 500+ Beds 13 Vendors share the remaining 6.05% of the market. * The total percentage may exceed 100 percent due to rounding or some organization may have more than one vendor or one CPACS modalities installed.

Hospital Cardiology PACS Top Vendors Considered for a Planned Purchase Vendor # of Times Considered GE HEALTHCARE 4 FUJIFILM MEDICAL SYSTEMS 4 PHILIPS HEALTHCARE 3 MCKESSON 3 MERGE HEALTHCARE 2 AGFA HEALTHCARE 2 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE 1 NOVARAD CORPORATION 1 CARESTREAM HEALTH 1

CPACS Applications Temporal Summary of Installation Catheter Laboratory (n=550) Computerized Tomography (n=311) Echocardiology (n=529) Intravascular Ultrasound (n=324) 34% 3 32% 29% 64% 67% 67% 69% Almost all of the CPACS applications contracts occurred after 2000, with more than half of the contracts for CPACS technology signed between 2005 and 2010. Nuclear Cardiology (n=312) 31% 67% Prior to 1985 1985 to 1989 1990 to 1994 1995 to 1999 2000 to 2004 2005 to 2010

Contact HIMSS Analytics Phone: 877-364-2500 Fax: 312-638-9401 Email: info@himssanalytics.org Web: www.himssanalytics.org