Similar documents
Christopher Harto Argonne National Laboratory

60%+ 33% Future Oil Recovery Efficiency. Recovery Efficiency. Today s Oil. May Advanced Resources International

Geologic Criteria for Eastern Kentucky Permanent CO 2 Storage (Saline reservoir test)

David Greeson and Kenji Hagiwara

Geologic Carbon Capture and Storage Sean I. Plasynski a ; John T. Litynski b ; Timothy R. Carr c ; Howard G. McIlvried d ; Rameshwar D.

SECARB 10 th Annual Stakeholders' Briefing. Southern Company CCS R&D: Plant Barry CCS Demo. Dr. Richard A. Esposito Southern Company.

Hydrocarbon Production from the South Ellwood Field and the Effects on Naturally Occurring Oil and Gas Seeps*

Remediation of Sodium Contaminated Sites

BASIN ORIENTED STRATEGIES FOR CO 2 ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY:

Shale Energy Fluids Management Practices

Monterey Shale Potential

California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel

THE DECISIVE ROLE OF CARBON STORAGE POTENTIAL IN THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE CCS OPTION

Reservoir Characterization and Initialization at Little Mitchell Creek

The Effect of EPA s Proposed NSPS on. Carbon Capture and Storage Technology

Marcellus Fast Facts

Shale Energy Produced Fluids Management and UIC Well Disposal Trends

Produced water from oil and gas production

Deep Geothermal energy and groundwater in

Moving Permian Basin Technology to the Gulf Coast: The Geologic Distribution of CO 2 EOR Potential in Gulf Coast Reservoirs

SaskPower CCS Global Consortium Bringing Boundary Dam to the World. Mike Monea, President Carbon Capture and Storage Initiatives

APPROVED. PXP 2009 Tank Leak Detection and Containment at Inglewood Oil Field. Baldwin Hills CSD Conditions L.18. and E.29.e.

Southern California Edison s

SUSTAINABLE RETURN ON INVESTMENT SROI

How To Calculate Energy In Quadrons

A Review of Gel Polymer Treatments in the Arbuckle Formation of Kansas

APES Math Review. For each problem show every step of your work, and indicate the cancellation of all units No Calculators!!

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

HISTORICAL FLOODS:

SPE Life beyond 80 A Look at Conventional WAG Recovery beyond 80% HCPV Injection in CO2 Tertiary Floods David Merchant, Merchant Consulting

Italy - Porto Tolle: storage in offshore saline aquifer

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE NORTHSTAR #1 CLASS II INJECTION WELL AND THE SEISMIC EVENTS IN THE YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO AREA

Available online at Petroleum & Coal 55 (4) , 2013

The Role of Groundwater in Alberta s Tight Water Supply Environment. Ken Baxter, M.Sc., P.Geol. Dan R. Brown, M.Sc., P.Geol.

RESERVOIR EVALUATION. The volume of hydrocarbons in a reservoir can be calculated:

Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Oil and gas exploration and production... 22a-472-1

Putting a chill on global warming

ROSS Technology Removal of Oil, Solids and Scale Formers

CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery

Potential for Geologic Storage of CO 2 in Western Maryland Phase I Studies

Geothermal: The Clean Energy Secret May 7, 2008

CO2-EOR POTENTIAL IN THE MGA REGION

APPENDIX D RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

KERN COUNTY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT FILING MINISTERIAL OIL AND GAS CONFORMITY REVIEW

Chapter 1 Introduction

Eric D. Larson Energy Systems Analysis Group, Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, USA

The California GHG Emissions Reporting Tool

MIDCONTINENT INTERACTIVE DIGITAL CARBON ATLAS AND RELATIONAL DATABASE (MIDCARB) Introduction

Natural Gas and Greenhouse Gases. OLLI Lectures November 2014 Dennis Silverman Physics and Astronomy UC Irvine

Assured capacity and safe geological storage of CO 2

Energy [R]evolution vs. IEA World Energy Outlook scenario

WA Parish Carbon Capture and Enhanced Oil Recovery Project. September 9, 2014

Remediation of Sodium Contaminated Sites

Half the cost Half the carbon

ECLIPSE Black Oil Simulator Advanced Options:

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY INVESTMENT IN CARBON, CAPTURE AND STORAGE (CCS)

Proposed Mobil Source Offset Provisions in California May Negatively Impact Air Quality

Improving Domestic Energy Security and Lowering CO 2 Emissions with Next Generation CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO 2 -EOR) June 20, 2011

On the Impact of Oil Extraction in North Orange County: Overview of Hydraulic Fracturing

Hot Rocks Geothermal Drilling, Operations and Insurance Implications

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT LINC ENERGY ACQUIRES OIL PRODUCING ASSETS IN WYOMING, USA

Growth Faulting, Associated Geologic Hazards, Economic & Regulatory Impact, and Methods of Investigation for the Houston, Texas Area

INTEGRATED CCS CHAIN ON OXYCOMBUSTION. Dominique Copin Coordinator CCS

Waterflooding. A Tried and True Technique for Secondary Oil Recovery. Houston Bar Association Oil, Gas and Mineral Law Section March 26, 2013

Topics: The Petroleum System. Origin of Petroleum. Arguments for biogenic origin. Google search : Origin of Petroleum : Hugoton Gas Field (Kansas)

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Alberta Research Council (ARC) Enhanced Coalbed Methane (ECBM) Recovery Project in Alberta, Canada

January, Prepared By. Steve Haze, Program Director. Fresno, California

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SELECTION WITH CAPABILITY OF EDITING A NEW PARAMETER FOR EOR SCREENING CRITERIA

SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program

Search and Discovery Article #40256 (2007) Posted September 5, Abstract

Geothermal. . To reduce the CO 2 emissions a lot of effort is put in the development of large scale application of sustainable energy.

City of Salinas Flood Response Preparations

Jarad Daniels U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy

Nutrient Reduction by Use of Industrial Deep Injection Wells, Miami-Dade County, Florida

The Geothermal Information System for Germany

Accelerating Commercial Deployment of CCS: Developing Incentives to Expand Anthropogenic CO2 Supply for Enhanced Oil Recovery Commercial

Remediation Services & Technology

3D Model of Carbon Relief in the Czech Part of Upper Silesian Coal Basin


Oil and Gas Terms. Anticline: An arch of stratified rock layers that may form a trap for hydrocarbons.

MYANMAR (BURMA) PRODUCTION ENHANCEMENT AND EXPLORATION OPPORTUNITY. 1

POLISH NATIONAL PROGRAMME ON SAFE CO2 GEOLOGICAL STORAGE

Underground Injection Wells For Produced Water Disposal

Transcription:

Geological Formations in the San Joaquin Valley -- Potential for Carbon Sequestration Dr. Jan Gillespie California State University Bakersfield

Target formations for CO 2 storage

Burruss et al., 2009

Sacramento Basin CENTRAL VALLEY San Joaquin Basin

Kern County produces 76% of California s oil and 60% of its gas ( CA DOGGR 2007 Annual Report)

Data Sources WESTCARB GIS Database California Oilfields and Power Plants California DOGGR Cumulative oil production from each reservoir in each oilfield, oilfield water salinities, temperatures, average depths and formation volume factors.

USGS criteria for carbon storage 3000 feet minimum depth Burruss et al., 2009

Modified from Burruss et al., 2009

K C t il d fi ld Kern County oil and gas fields over 3000 feet deep

USGS criteria for carbon storage 3000 feet minimum depth Formation water salinity greater than 10,000 ppm Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) (based on USEPA guidelines) Burruss et al., 2009

Deep Kern Oil and Gas fields Deep Kern Oil and Gas fields with salinities over 10,000 ppm

USGS criteria for carbon storage 3000 feet minimum depth Formation water salinity greater than 10,000 ppm Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) (based on USEPA guidelines) Minimum i storage size 12.5 MM Bbls (equivalent to 1 to 1.4 MM metric tons of CO 2 ) Burruss et al., 2009

Cumulative production calculations Used only oil production (DOGGR 2007) did not consider produced water or gas. Corrected volume of produced oil for shrinkage -- Used formation volume factors from DOGGR reports to convert produced oil from surface barrels (Stock Tank Barrels) to reservoir barrels

1 surface bbl of oil Gas that has come out of solution in the produced oil 1 reservoir bbl of oil and dissolved gas

Fields meeting depth, salinity and cumulative production criteria Target Fields Cumulative Oil Production Reservoir barrels 13,590,059-200,000,000 200,000,001-400,000,000 400,000,001-600,000,000 600,000,001-800,000,000 800,000,001-1,000,000,000

Guidelines for miscible CO 2 floods API = >28 o and depths greater than 3300 ft API = 22-28 28 o and depths greater than 4000 ft API < 22 fails miscible CO 2 screening Taber et al. (1997)

Target Fields with API gravity greater than 22

Temblor Fm. Legend Producing Formations Prod_Fm Chanac Kreyenhagen Monterey Reef Ridge Santa Margarita Temblor Vedder

Temblor Fm Temblor Fm. ~512,291,000 Reservoir Bbls. in the target fields

Vedder Fm. Legend Producing Formations Prod_Fm Chanac Kreyenhagen Monterey Reef Ridge Santa Margarita Temblor Vedder

Vedder Fm. ~422,877,000 Reservoir Bbls. in the target fields

Monterey Fm. Legend Producing Formations Prod_Fm Chanac Kreyenhagen Monterey Reef Ridge Santa Margarita Temblor Vedder

Monterey Fm. (primarily Stevens Sand) y (p y ) ~2,043,686,000 Reservoir Bbls. in the target fields

California CO 2 Emissions 103.7 MM metric tons/yr (DOE NETL NATCARB Atlas, 2008) 16.2 % from electricity generation with most of this coming from oil and gas powered plants (Benson, 2001) 82% of these emissions come from plants generating over 50 MW (Benson, 2001)

Power Plants in California

Kern County CO 2 Sources and Potential Sinks Power Plants ANNUAL CO2 emissions (tonnes) 41-745,282 745,283-2,507,644 2,507,645-5,852,316 5852317-5,852,317 9511053 9,511,053 9,511,054-18,559,426 Most of the target fields are within 10 miles of a CO 2 emission source Target Fields Cumulative Oil Production Reservoir barrels 13,590,059-200,000,000 200,000,001-400,000,000 400,000,001-600,000,000 600,000,001-800,000,000 800,000,001-1,000,000,000

CO 2 generation and storage capacity in Kern County Power plants in the San Joaquin Valley portion of Kern County produce about 17 MM tons of CO 2 /yr (WESTCARB GIS Database) Target fields have a total cumulative oil production of 3.2 Bbbls (reservoir bbls) Burrus et al. (2009) note that 12.5 MM bbls of reservoir pore space can accommodate 1 to 1.4 MM metric tons of CO 2 Therefore, the target reservoirs should be able to accommodate at least 250 MM tons of CO 2 and provide about 15 years of storage potential at current emission rates.

Conclusions At least twenty three fields in the Kern County portion of the San Joaquin Valley meet the criteria for CCS as established by the USGS. All but two of the 23 fields have potential for miscible CO 2 enhanced oil recovery programs. The main subsurface targets for CCS are the Temblor, Vedder and dm Monterey formations. At a minimum, the 23 fields can store at least 250 MM tons of CO2. At current annual rates, this would supply 15 years of Kern power plant emissions.