Remediation of Sodium Contaminated Sites

Transcription

1 Remediation of Sodium Contaminated Sites..\..\3918b1ca23763e9e9a12ffd67acb0ceb.jpg 21 st International Petroleum Environmental Conference, Houston, Texas Mark Landress P.G. Project Navigator, Ltd Town & Country Way # 830 Houston, TX Hulett Evans SOS Environmental 719 Saw Dust Road Woodlands, Texas

2 Salt and Sodium Contamination Overview 98% of oil production waste is high TDS produced water. Oilfield produced water (PW) brine is the major source of salt and sodium contamination to soil and groundwater. Thousands of sites across the US are affected. There are 18 billion bbl of produced water generated onshore from oil production, less from gas. New sources include coal bed methane, desalination and R/O systems and shale production. Many states are becoming vigilant about the problem given the threat to groundwater. Because of visual impact and loss of vegetation, landowner action is driving remediation of production sites which would previously be abandoned with minimal action. Sodium impacts from produced water brines pose particular challenges and require specific understanding of the soils and chemistry to treat effectively. A variety of methods are employed to control salt damage. Some case studies using chemical and physical control is presented.

3 Produced Water Problem Areas Production location with brine discharges and residual oil from leaky well head packing. Leaks and discharges from injection wells. Surface discharge of salt water from historical brine discharge area. Pipeline and flow line leaks. Soil damaged due to sodium impacts.

4 How Salt Causes Damage Saline Conditions - High total dissolved solids (TDS) High TDS = high salinity: Interferes with plant growth limiting the uptake of water. Dissolved salts directly toxic to plants. Plants are sensitive at early growth stage. High TDS measured by electrical conductivity (EC). Sodic Conditions - Low EC but high Na. Excess sodium: Damages the soil structure, clogs soil pores, prevents water infiltration. Clay soils most affected. Saline - Sodic Conditions - High EC and high Na. Have chemical characteristics of both saline and sodic soils. Plant growth affected by both excess salt and excess sodium. Other Components - Oil, Metals Metals including zinc can interfere with plant growth. Contributions from TPH and drilling mud components All conditions kill or stress vegetation with stunted growth, tip burn, bronzing and defoliation. Because of the high sodium and salinity conditions of produced water, damaged areas are commonly both saline and sodic.

5 Classification of Salt Impacted Soils Typical RAO Target Frequency Produced Water TDS Sea Water PPM EC of Produced Water (TX) More Frequency 500 More EC MMOHS TX Produced Water SAR n=12, Frequency More Average levels of salt and sodium in produced water are so high that any discharge will have significant effects on soil and plants. Characteristics of Produced Water in Texas. Ref: USGS API 4758

6 Factors Affecting Salt Damage in Soil Soil Type Clay rich soils have higher cation exchange capacity (CEC) and surface area. Can absorb greater amounts of soluble salts. Sandy soils are easier to manage. Exchangeable sodium (ESP) tends to be higher in fine soils. Organic Matter and ph Organic material can promote drainage or absorb salts. Climatic Conditions and Drainage, Geology Higher rainfall tends to promote leaching of salts. Soils generally easier to reclaim under moist conditions. Soils already high in salts harder to reclaim. High groundwater levels can either help or hurt depending on salt content. Available Water Quality High quality irrigation water with low dissolved salts is better for reclamation. Duration of Impact, Volume and Composition of PW Small volumes and short contact time obviously favorable. Pits, seeps, historical discharges that affect deeper soils harder to treat.

7 Remediation Strategy STEP 1 Identify the problem, source and magnitude by thoroughly characterizing site. Factor including soil characteristics, topography & drainage, stratigraphy & depth of saturated zone, timing & duration of salt impact. Sample soil and water for key parameters (CEC, EC, SAR, conductivity). Hydrocarbons and metals may also need to be sampled. Geophysics may also be appropriate. STEP 2 Devise the management plan which takes into account the short and long term surface soil management, land use and potential groundwater issues. Perform field test if applicable. STEP 3 Implement reclamation based upon the management plan and results of field tests. STEP 4 Monitor progress to ensure remediation is effective. Depending on the situation, short term results can be dramatic. In others, long term monitoring may be needed.

8 Chemical Sodium Remediation Mechanism Our preferred approach uses calcium amendment with water to displace enough sodium to sustain vegetation. Bulk with straw, bagasse etc., add surfactant and amendment, saturate to replace Na with Ca. Na displaced into soil with lower ESP. Calcium eventually binds to remediate surface soil. Chloride is flushed out and soil eventually regains its structure. Sodium content of subsurface soil will increase as sodium is displaced from the impacted zone. Site specific soil conditions, groundwater and and geologic factors influence how the amendments are applied. Ca Na Calcium Source Impacted Zone Displacement Zone Normal soil Soil flushing or drains may be needed depending on soil conditions

9 Salt Management Options Natural Attenuation Onsite Treatment Excavation SAR < 12 ESP < 12 EC < 10 Minor spills, sandy soils with good drainage. Adequate rainfall. Some tolerant plants will grow. Soil damage shallow. Slow In-situ mixing with bulking and amendment. Impact > 3 feet requires special management. Ca-exchanging chemical amendments (fast), gypsum (slow). Careful characterization needed for mixing calculation. Metals and hydrocarbons may drive treatment strategy. Smaller sites, areas with shallow GW or heavy HC & metals that can not be handled with mixing or amendment. Focused problem areas with high visual impact. Can be $$ depending on situation. In the absence of a strict cleanup criteria, planting of salt tolerant vegetation is an effective alternative where treatment is not feasible or economic.

10 Case Study Area Scott, Louisiana Metrics Former commercial disposal facility Overall Area 80 Acres Study Area - 8 acres SAR Avg ~ 30 ESP Avg ~ 20 Zn mg/kg TTB 50, ,000 mg/kg Impact depth up to18 feet Target treatment depth - 3ft Drilling mud pits- Soil-like but not soil. 29B Compliance Impacted area is historical brine disposal pit. Silty clay soil. Excess salt crusts at surface. Saline-sodic conditions with poor soil structure and defoliated conditions.

11 Sampling & Evaluation Program An extensive sampling program was devised to address all 29B parameters. At least 2 samples per acre. 250' Sample Layout Composite Preparation Single composite is made for each 6.5 acre area. Spot samples collected in high salt areas. Chemical amendment and in-situ treatment selected as appropriate remedy. No offsite disposal. Computer Modeling Constituents by Depth

12 Remedy Phase - Excavation Pit bottom Total mix depth QA depth measurement Blended Stockpile Soil excavated soil through impacted zone. Clean soil mix depth calculated to reduce salt, metals and TPH to 29B compliance limits. Blended stockpile compacted lightly with bulking material and amendment. Sample collected for QA for TPH & metals. SAR calculated for blended stockpile to calculate amendment addition.

13 Remedy Phase - Treatment Sugar cane pulp added as bulking agent. Liquid amendment from SOS Environmental Bulking material is added and mixed in soil. Prepared area is treated with surfactant and water to wet soil for amendment application. Calcium amendment is added using spray trailers in concentrations calculated from ESP.

14 Post Treatment Progress Areas flooded after treatment Two years post-treatment Treated areas are planted with Bermuda grass which is relatively salt tolerant. Test plots of salt-tolerant crops including grasses, barley, wheat, and others are planted to reduce runoff and enrich the soil. Turnips planted as forage crop test

15 Periodic Maintenance Impacted area is periodically checked for soil development and vegetative growth. Compost (sugar cane pulp, hay, rice hulls, wood chips) is applied. Soil is ripped and disked with heavy agricultural equipment. Bermuda grass re-seeded as needed. Area is irrigated naturally by rainfall. No additional water is added.

16 Assessing the Results Pre Remedial Post Remedial Most Recent Pre and post-remedial results are compared and progress monitored until compliance reached. Overall reduction in SAR is measure of performance. Costs: Initial cost for chemical treatment: $0.33 to $0.45/sf Total treatment cost including excavation and mixing: $0.89/sf Total project cost in the range of $4.5MM Estimated avoided cost compared with dig/haul >$20MM

17 10 Years Post Closure

18 Lessons Learned for Scott, Louisiana Property Drilling mud added complexity to the project. Drilling mud does not behave as soil. Subsurface soils need low ESP and good drainage to carry away displaced salts. Deep mixing and heavy bulking is needed to achieve percolation through soil gumbo where drains were not feasible. Additional organic material plowed on surface was needed to build up organic layer needed sustain vegetation. Fertilizer application which promotes vegetation growth had to be minimized to avoid binding free calcium until the soil reaction was complete.

19 Case Study - Pittsburgh Co, Oklahoma Underground pipe leak Produced water -3.6 Acres Conditions Saline / sodic soils with red clay EC 30+ SAR 70 ESP 50 CEC 24 Treatment Excavate to 12 depth. Install drain tiles and sump Bulk soil with hay and replace in 2 foot lifts Apply amendment Irrigate with water Contaminated water to disposal well Amendments Applied DeSalt Plus Geo Rinse Re-seed Duration 16 months SOS Remediation cost $3.6 MM Est. dig/haul cost $14.4MM

20 Case Study - Harris County, Texas Historic site Salt Water Disposal System Conditions Sodic Soil EC 77 SAR 125 ESP 93 CEC 40 Treatment Deep plow and bulk soil Install drain with bulking materials Apply amendments & irrigate Amendments Applied DeSalt Plus Geo Rinse Re-seed native grass and turnips Time 18 Months SOS Remediation cost $250K Est. dig/haul cost $1.2 MM

21 Case Study - S. Arkansas Historic site Salt Water Disposal Conditions Sodic Soil & Sandy Clay with Topsoil Erosion EC SAR ESP CEC 6-15 Treatment Install drain Deep plow and bulk soil Apply amendments & irrigate Amendments Applied DeSalt Plus Geo Rinse Jumpstart Test seeding then replanting with native grass Time 25 Months SOS Remediation cost $150K Est. dig/haul cost $13 MM

22 Case Study Montgomery County, TX Recent Spill Salt Water Leak Conditions Sandy clay EC 84 SAR 38 ESP 35 CEC 17 Treatment Test soil Apply amendments & irrigate Amendments Applied DeSalt Plus Geo Rinse Reseed with native grasses Time 9 Months SOS Remediation cost $14K Est. dig/haul cost $750K

23 Summary A variety of options are available for salt contaminated sites. Chemical treatment offers a cost effective alternative compared with dig and haul. When properly applied, results are dramatic and result in high satisfaction with clients, landowners and regulators.

24 Useful References API Publication 4758 Recent publication on strategies for managing produced water contamination. Deuel & Holiday Very good reference with example calculations and detailed descriptions. USDA Handbook 60 Complete reference from US Salinity Laboratory.