Penn State Cooperative Extension

Similar documents
Marcellus Fast Facts

Monitoring and Protection Program Recent Highlights and Future Directions

BASELINE WATER QUALITY SAMPLING IN SHALE GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION AREAS

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Wastewater Treatment Story: Three Decades and Counting

Real-Time Monitoring Buoy in Mystic River Watershed

Life After Getting a BS and MS Degree Working as a Professional in PA

Comprehensive Plan for the Water Resources of the Susquehanna River Basin

How to think about evaluating a webinar

Elin Betanzo WRRM Annual Meeting April 6, 2016

The Delaware Valley Early Warning System Kelly Anderson, Philadelphia Water

A White Paper Describing a Watershed-based Monitoring Network Design for the Purgatoire River Basin

DEVELOPMENT OF A WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND EARLY WARNING DETECTION SYSTEM ON THE ALLEGHENY AND MONONGAHELA RIVERS IN PENNSYLVANIA. Jerry G.

Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Solids Concentrations in Tributaries to the Great Bay Estuary Watershed in 2011

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA WATER YEAR 2002 WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT

Innovative Removal of Agricultural Related Water Pollutants in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

EPA New England Regional Laboratory. EPA Project Team: Liz McCarthy. Matt Destino Tim Bridges Dick Siscanaw

Data Management Tool. October 18, Developed by: Funded by: Research Office of Information Technology

water quality 2007 annual report Huntington District Our Customer Charter Dear West Virginia American Water Customer,

Chesapeake Bay and Potomac Tidal Monitoring Programs Past, Present and Future

Features COMMUNITY-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT OF WATER CONTAMINATION FROM HIGH-VOLUME HORIZONTAL HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

FACT SHEET STATEMENT OF BASIS HARLEY DOME 1 PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT FACILITY UPDES PERMIT NUMBER: UT NEW PERMIT MINOR INDUSTRIAL

Rouge River Watershed, MI Region 5. Community Case Study ROU-1. Number of CSO Outfalls. Combined Sewer Service Area. Wastewater Treatment Capacity

TREATMENT OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER PLANT WASTE WATER IN FLORIDA FOR DISCHARGE AND RE USE PURPOSES

Ginger Paige and Nancy Mesner University of Wyoming Utah State University

Spills and leaks Associated with Shale Gas Development (Updated April 27 th, 2012)

APPENDIX 4 Water Quality Monitoring Program Plan

Greater Los Angeles County Region

1. Inspection and monitoring... 3

Pajaro River Watershed Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Project Solicitation Form

Data Management Tool -

Zero Discharge Water Management for. Horizontal Shale Gas Well Development

Christopher Harto Argonne National Laboratory

Site Attendance Guidelines for Automated/Unattended Monitoring and Process Controlled Facilities

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Frequently Asked Transmission Pipeline Questions

Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

DESWAT project (Destructive Water Abatement and Control of Water Disasters)

Market-Based Programs for Water Quality Improvement: (Part of) the solution to diffuse pollution?

Pre-Treatment Water Quality in the Aaron Run Watershed

Chesapeake Bay FieldScope Activity Teacher Guide

Produced water from oil and gas production

Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short- Term Ambient Air Sampling Project

Natural Gas Pipelines

Application Form 2E. Facilities Which Do Not Discharge Process Wastewater

Report for 2004SC10B: Application of Emerging Technologies for Water Quality Monitoring and Data Transfer in the Saluda-Reedy Watershed

Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy

Well Water Contamination: SWPA-EHP Ranking System and Monitoring Strategy

Anish Jantrania (photo) and Allen Knapp

Reclamation of Marcellus Shale Drilling Sites in West Virginia by Jeff Skousen and Paul Ziemkiewicz West Virginia University

TEXAS: SAN ANTONIO San Antonio Protects Edwards Aquifer

EPA Grants Supported Restoring the Chesapeake Bay

Floating Treatment Wetland Technology: Nutrient Removal from Wastewater

How do you treat water based on water quality from different water sources?

FIVE-YEAR ASSESSMENT REPORT

The Terms of reference (ToR) for conducting Rapid EIA study for the proposed project is described below:

Shale Energy Fluids Management Practices

City of Mebane Wastewater Collection and Treatment Facility

Ion Exchange Softening

Environment Canada's Water Quality Monitoring Programs and the National Automated Monitoring Network

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Application of Snow Core and Automated Remote Data Collection to Monitor SWE in NYC s Water Supply Watershed

Using R to Analyze Data from Probabilistic Monitoring in Oklahoma. Jean Lemmon

Improper storage of fuel on construction sites will increase the risk of water pollution that may occur as a result of leaks or spills.

Source Water/Water Quality Emerging Issues & Updates

Watershed Education for Teachers. Cinde Thomas-Jimenez Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority

Hardness Comparisons

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Deployment of networks of innovative water quality sensors for distribution network monitoring Joep van den Broeke (Ph.D.)

Rule 318A.f: Rule Description

The Impact of Marcellus Gas Drilling on Rural Drinking Water Supplies

January 2014: Jeanne Briskin of the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

In Fracking s Wake: New Rules are Needed to Protect Our Health and Environment from Contaminated Wastewater

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Please find enclosed the Operational Unit 2 (OU2) Lincoln Park Water Use Survey plan for your review.

USEPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study Water Management Workshop

Environmentally Friendly Drilling Systems. Technology Integration Program. Case Study Chalk Hill Ranch/Dewitt County Field Trial 2, Texas June 2013

Guide to Writing a Water Quality Monitoring Plan

Town of New Castle Utility Department Introduction

Storm Water Runoff from Natural Gas Well Sites in North Texas: Sampling, Modeling, and Management Options

Using Volunteer & AmeriCorps Monitoring Data

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION MAPPING FOR VARIOUS POLLUTANTS OF AL-KUFA RIVER USING GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS)

Total Suspended Solids Total Dissolved Solids Hardness

Oil and Gas Extraction and Source Water Protection

2014 Report. water Quality. Cleveland Water

Social Science Research Institute: Proposal for Level 1 Funding

~Pennsylvania Campaign for Clean Water~ Stormwater Workgroup

Current Water Quality Trading Program Applications in the US:

Shale Energy Produced Fluids Management and UIC Well Disposal Trends

Executive Summary Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy

METRO REGIONAL GOVERNMENT Records Retention Schedule

pennsylvania Mr. Shawn Garvin Regional Administrator U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA

Early SNMP Case Studies Salt and Nutrient Management Plans and Related Issues at Camp Pendleton MCB. Rob Beggs, Brown and Caldwell

DOCKET NO. D CP-2 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

David Alleman, ALL Consulting Bill Hochheiser, ALL Consulting. NETL Project Kick-off Meeting January 7, 2010

Comparing Levels of Phosphates in Dishwasher Detergents

Highly Colored Water Removal Using Nanofiltration Membranes at the Colored Water Treatment Facility. Adam Zacheis, Project Manager Carollo Engineers

Prepared for City of Vancouver Surface Water Management

Acid Mine Water Remediation a case study

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATER QUALITY PROTECTION. Policy for Permitting Surface Water Diversions

Transcription:

Penn State Cooperative Extension Marcellus Shale Educational Webinar Series April 2010 - September 2010

Penn State Cooperative Extension Marcellus Shale Educational Webinars April 2010 September 2010 Six-part series of one-hour on-line educational seminars Our goal is to help address the opportunities and challenges related to exploring for gas in the Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania Audiences Public officials at all levels Cooperative Extension and other educational organizations Planning and economic development agencies or groups Environmental organizations People who might influence public policy or individual decisions regarding exploration for gas Citizens For more information: http://naturalgas.extension.psu.edu/events.htm

Marcellus Shale Webinar Series Planning Committee Members Mark Douglass, Jefferson County Neal Fogle, Montour County Joann Kowalski, Susquehanna County John Turack, Westmoreland County Charles Abdalla, Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology Dept. University Park With help from: Kathy Brasier, Tim Kelsey & Rachel Perry, Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology Dept. University Park Nancy Ellen Kiernan, Program Evaluator Peg Shuffstall, Jacki Weikert & Sherry Crum, Information Technology Specialists Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences

Today s Webinar Water Quality Monitoring Programs in Pennsylvania Susquehanna River Basin Commission's Remote Water Quality Monitoring Network - Andrew Gavin, Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) River Alert Information Network (RAIN) in Southwest Pennsylvania. - Jeanne VanBriesen, Carnegie Mellon University

Susquehanna River Basin Remote Water Quality Monitoring Network Program Overview Penn State Cooperative Extension Webinar Series June 17, 2010

Susquehanna River Basin The Basin 27,510-square-mile watershed Comprises 43% of the Chesapeake Bay watershed 4.2 million population 60% forested 32,000+ miles of waterways The Susquehanna River 444 miles, largest tributary to the Chesapeake Bay Supplies 18 million gallons a minute to the bay

Commission Monitoring Programs Monitoring throughout the Commission s history Performing water quality, biological and habitat monitoring since the early 1980s for core programs Assisting member jurisdictions with targeted needs (SWP, TMDLs, etc.) Assisting watershed groups Aquatic resource surveys The Susquehanna River Early Warning System (EWS) -- utilizing advanced technology

Susquehanna River Early Warning System (EWS) Initiated in PA in 2003, and expanded into NY in 2006 Helping minimize impact from spills through early detection at public water supply intakes in PA and NY General framework for the system Standard parameters include temperature, ph, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, conductance, organics detection (4 stations) Real-time data transmission Stand-alone datasonde stations

Network Objectives To establish a real-time monitoring network at areas of concern in the Susquehanna River Basin; To establish baseline water quality conditions; To verify whether or not the natural gas well industry and/or other activities are causing adverse impacts on local water quality; To form collaborative partnerships to improve monitoring technology and provide educational opportunities; To enhance protection for water supplies; and To be responsive to public concerns.

Remote Water Quality Monitoring Network Project concept developed Fall 2009 Partners Workshop October 29, 2009 Implementation funding December 2009 SRBC allocated $250,000 East Resources Inc. contribution of $750,000 Start of network deployment January 2010

Station Locations Factors behind area of interest Activities associated with natural gas development (Drilling activity, water withdrawal/disposal, potential for spills, etc.) Sensitivity of headwater areas (Aquatic life, recreation, public water supply) Public concerns Network Design

Station Locations Network Design Site considerations Watershed size (~ 30 to 60 square miles) Channel morphology and flow ranges Land use Property access and power supply Seasonal conditions (i.e., ice, summer low flow)

Data Collection Continuous monitoring Network Design Conductance Temperature, ph, dissolved oxygen, turbidity Depth Routine grab sample monitoring Conducted by SRBC staff Calibration visits and field checks

Depth ph Turbidity Temperature Dissolved Oxygen Conductance

Network Design Data Collection Routine grab sample monitoring - Approximately six times a year Possible parameters - Acidity/Alkalinity, Chloride, Barium, Bromide, Strontium, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Sulfate, Total Organic Carbon (TOC), and the typical field parameters (ph, conductance, etc.) - Approximately four times a year Ca, Mg, Na, K, Nitrate, Carbonate Alkalinity, Bicarbonate Alkalinity, Carbonate Gross alpha and beta

Network Design Real-time data transmission Intervals can vary by station Alarms to go to SRBC staff for further investigation (deviations from any baseline) Web site interface Data access considered provisional, with no filtering of data for the public Public education (with all the usual disclaimers) Annual Data Report Incorporates real-time data and grab sample data Summary of overall conditions and activities for the network

Website Interface (www.srbc.net/programs/remotenetwork.htm)

Provisional Data Results** To date for all stations (16 installed) >500,000 WQ observations Sample records for 5 stations over the past month Average temperature 16.8 O C Average specific conductance 130 micros/cm Average ph 7.42 Average turbidity 5.8 NTU Average dissolved oxygen 9.5 mg/l Maximum specific conductance for all sites 240 micros/cm **Not corrected yet for calibration drift, out of range values, probe malfunctions, etc.

Susquehanna River Basin Remote Water Quality Monitoring Network Andrew Gavin Section Chief, Restoration and Protection 717-238-0426 x 107 agavin@srbc.net June 17, 2010

Penn State Cooperative Extension Marcellus Shale Educational Webinar Series April 2010 - September 2010

Today s Webinar Water Quality Monitoring Programs in Pennsylvania Susquehanna River Basin Commission's Remote Water Quality Monitoring Network - Andrew Gavin, Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) River Alert Information Network (RAIN) in Southwest Pennsylvania. - Jeanne VanBriesen, Carnegie Mellon University

Previously Recorded Educational Webinars Water Use & Water Quality Issues Above the Marcellus Shale - Minimizing Impacts to Forests & Wildlife Planning for Community Impacts Marcellus Shale Workforce Needs Assessment Community Response Options to Marcellus Shale & Energy Development Treatment/Disposal Options for Wastewaters from Shale Gas Drilling Leasing & Drilling on State-Owned Lands Marcellus Shale Legislation & Litigation: A Year (2009) in Review Post Leasing-Considerations of What Happens Next, Lessons Learned to Date Underground Injection Wells as an Option for Disposal of Shale Gas Wastewaters: Policies and Practicality Impact of Marcellus Shale: What Do the Economic Impact Studies Imply? Perspectives on Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Southwest PAA Decade of Lessons Learned from Urban Drilling in Fort Worth The above webinars can be viewed at: http://naturalgas.extension.psu.edu/webinars.htm