Information Paper: TEQSA s approach to regulating the offshore provision of regulated HE awards

Similar documents
Information Paper: TEQSA s approach to the assessment of joint and dual awards

Quality Assurance of Cross-border Higher Education Australia Country Report TEQSA

TEQSA and the Australian Qualifications Framework. Questions and answers

Joint Statement of Principles for Professional Accreditation

AQF Qualifications Pathways Policy

Proposed HIGHER EDUCATION STANDARDS FRAMEWORK

DRIVING THE DIFFERENCE

HIGHER EDUCATION STANDARDS FRAMEWORK

APPLICATION GUIDE AND APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AS AN AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE EFFECTIVE FROM 1 JANUARY 2013

STATISTICS REPORT ON TEQSA REGISTERED HIGHER EDUCATION PROVIDERS

National Guidelines for Higher Education Approval Processes

AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION

NATIONAL PROTOCOLS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION APPROVAL PROCESSES

Quality Assurance and Qualification Recognition Exchange Project

Australian Social Work Education and Accreditation Standards (ASWEAS) Guideline 1.3: Guidance on RPL, articulation and credit transfer

RTO Delegations Guidelines

Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) 2015

Responsibilities for quality assurance in teaching and learning

SECTION 03 PERFORMANCE

Offshore and Cross-Border Programs

Teaching Qualifications - Full, Provisional and Non-Practising Registration

Recognition of prior learning

The TEQSA S Risk-Based Approach to Assuring High Education

The Cloud and Cross-Border Risks - Singapore

TAFE Development Centre response to the Productivity Commission Issues Paper on the VET Workforce

Chiropractic Boards response 15 December 2008

Board Charter. HCF Life Insurance Company Pty Ltd (ACN ) (the Company )

The University of Melbourne. Response to TEQSA Discussion Papers. 3 December 2013

La Trobe Melbourne. Course Development Policy

Life Insurance Act 1995 Audit Obligations

COURSE OUTLINE TAE50211 Diploma of Training Design and Development

The quality assurance of transnational education: challenges and solutions. Carolyn Campbell Head of International Affairs

Accreditation of Initial Teacher Education Programs in Australia

Audit report VET Quality Framework Initial registration as a national VET regulator (NVR) registered training organisation

So you're thinking of becoming an RTO?

COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION INQUIRY: THE MARKET FOR RETAIL TENANCY LEASES IN AUSTRALIA

International Skills Institute COURSE OUTLINE. BSB50407 Diploma of Business Administration RTO 40541

Financial Services Guide

Australia-wide accreditation of programs for the professional preparation of teachers. A consultation paper

Executive Director Institute of Diagnostic Ultrasound

Note that the following document is copyright, details of which are provided on the next page.

IMMIGRATION INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIPS WITH EDUCATION PROVIDERS Purpose

MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY STUDENT AND ACADEMIC SERVICES. Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement

Manager, Continuing Education and Testing. Responsible Officer Policy Officer Approver. Marc Weedon-Newstead Emma Drummond Rob Forage

A Strategic Approach to QA for Transnational Education Programs. Stephen Connelly & Jim Garton

Guidance on UK medical education delivered outside the UK. Introduction. Purpose of guidance

PRINCIPLES ON OUTSOURCING OF FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR MARKET INTERMEDIARIES

Who is ANMAC? What are ANMAC accreditation standards?

Submission by the Commonwealth Ombudsman

Foreign collective investment schemes

Guidance for English and Welsh lawyers on the practice of foreign law in Australia and admission as an Australian legal practitioner

Credit Arrangements Policy

FTSE GROUP MARKET CONSULTATION ON NATIONALITY ABI RESPONSE

Application for Status as a Registered Bank:

PROPOSAL FOR ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT NEW COURSES

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR PROGRAMS OF STUDY IN PSYCHOLOGY

Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consolidated KYC Risk Management

Comparison table showing 2015 accreditation standards for specialist medical programs and professional development programs against the 2010 standards

PROPERTY OF THE SECURITIES COMMISSION OF THE BAHAMAS

Transnational education partnership patterns, trends and regulatory challenges

International Skills Institute COURSE OUTLINE BSB51107 DIPLOMA OF MANAGEMENT RTO 40541

Guidance on what constitutes a remittance network provider (RNP) Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act)

Exposure Draft Proposed Guideline TPB(PG) D04/2014

Policy Statement: Licensing Policy in respect of those activities that require a permit under the Insurance Business (Jersey) Law 1996

Financial Markets Accreditation Program

Board means the Board of Directors of each of Scentre Group Limited, Scentre Management Limited, RE1 Limited and RE2 Limited.

Accreditation under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 1 (the National Law)

Re-entry to practice policy

FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES GUIDELINES POLICE RECORD CHECK

The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

International Skills Institute COURSE OUTLINE. BSB50207 Diploma of Business RTO 40541

Professional Indemnity Proposal Form Business & Management Consultants

Discussion Paper. Issues Impacting the Accounting Industry from Outsourcing

Professional Indemnity Proposal Form

Review of the Tasmanian Building Regulatory Framework. Response from the Board of Architects of Tasmania

Policy (Board Approved)

PRINCIPLES ON OUTSOURCING OF FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR MARKET INTERMEDIARIES

GE Money s Know Your Intermediary Personal Loan Broker Application

Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) 2014

International Accreditation Guidelines and Procedures

SUBMISSION TO PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION REVIEW OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION SCHEMES JANUARY 2015

Professional Practice in Australian ICT Degrees A Proposal. Chris Pilgrim and Tony Koppi The Australian Council of Deans of ICT (ACDICT) July 2011

COURSE OUTLINE BSB51415 DIPLOMA OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Marketing and regulation: An update on regulatory impacts to marketing of RMIT programs and services

Transnational education and engineering accreditation

OFFSHORING Data the new privacy laws

BOARD CHARTER. Its objectives are to: provide strategic guidance for the Company and effective oversight of management;

Re: Accreditation Standard for Entry-Level Physiotherapy in Australia: Draft One, May 2015

Corporate Governance Guidelines

IMPORTANT NOTICES: Your duty, however, does not require disclosure of matter:

POLICY FOR MASTER S AND DOCTORAL DEGREES

Guidelines for the Presentation of the Australian Higher Education Graduation Statement

Corporate Governance Statement

¼ããÀ ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä ã¼ãîãä ã ããõà ãäìããä ã½ã¾ã ºããñ Ã


Essential Standards for Registration

Credit Arrangements Policy

Response for TEQSA Future Directions and Risk Framework

Transcription:

Information Paper: TEQSA s approach to regulating the offshore provision of regulated HE awards September 2013

Introduction Australia plays a significant role in the global provision of transnational education (TNE), and a number of providers have been involved in offshore education for many years, with extensive experience in assuring the quality of higher education offered. The quality of offshore education involving Australian higher education providers is critical to the reputation of not only the provider, but also for the Australian higher education sector in general. Offshore operations are open to international scrutiny and have a direct influence on the perceived quality of higher education delivered by Australian providers. To supplement and validate provider quality assurance mechanisms already in place, TEQSA is committed to a rigorous approach to the regulation of offshore provision of Australian higher education that recognises the strengths of the system while ensuring that students, in whatever location they are studying, have a quality education experience. This information sheet provides an overview of TEQSA s approach to its regulatory assessment and quality assurance processes for offshore provision of Australian higher education. Offshore education delivery may be fully online (or distance); fully face to face; or, in the majority of cases, mixed or blended (involving online and face to face instruction). Definition Offshore provision (also referred to as Transnational Education (TNE)) involves an arrangement whereby a course of study that leads to a regulated higher education award is provided either partly or fully outside Australia by either (a) a registered higher education provider (irrespective of the provider category in which they are registered), or (b) through collaboration between a registered higher education provider and one or more third parties. Other terms commonly used include cross-border education or borderless education. This differs from cooperative/guaranteed pathways involving partnership with institutions offshore for credit into an award delivered by a registered higher education provider in Australia. TEQSA s responsibilities TEQSA s regulatory and QA responsibilities relevant for offshore provision of higher education include protecting and enhancing: Australia s reputation for quality higher education and training services Australia s international competitiveness in the higher education sector excellence, diversity and innovation in higher education in Australia students undertaking, or proposing to undertake, higher education by requiring the provision of quality higher education. TEQSA s role is to effectively regulate to assure that a provider s responsibilities under the TEQSA Act and the Higher Education Framework are upheld and maintained where the provider is involved in offshore higher education provision. TEQSA s approach to the regulation of offshore HE provision 1

Provider responsibilities Whatever offshore arrangement is contemplated by a regulated higher education provider, and irrespective of the delivery location, responsibility for each regulated award granted and its academic standard is the responsibility of the higher education provider. Most TNE engagement is undertaken through partnership or other third party arrangements, and third parties may not necessarily be higher education institutions. Section 26 of the TEQSA Act requires a registered higher education provider that offers or confers a regulated higher education award for the completion of a course of study provided wholly or partly by another entity to ensure that the other entity provides the course of study consistently with the Threshold Standards. The Threshold Standards apply to all a provider s activities, regardless of delivery site and place and cover arrangements with third parties. For example: Provider Registration Standard 4.5 requires that where the higher education provider has an arrangement in place with another entity to manage or deliver some or all of a course of study on its behalf, the higher education provider has effective mechanisms to manage and quality assure all aspects of the arrangement, including admission and support of students and delivery of the course of study to ensure student learning outcomes equivalent to those for the same or cognate course of study when delivered by the higher education provider Course Accreditation Standard 1.10 requires that if a course of study is to be offered through arrangements with another entity, whether in Australia or overseas, the course documentation specifies the detailed quality assurance arrangements that have been made with the other entity to ensure student learning outcomes are equivalent to those when the course of study is offered directly by the higher education provider. TEQSA s approach Guiding Principles The implementation of the approach to regulation of offshore provision of regulated higher education awards will be guided by seven key principles: 1. TEQSA will seek to protect the interests of both current and prospective students who are undertaking, or are seeking to undertake, higher education in any location outside Australia. 2. A provider s offshore delivery will be regulated having regard to: a. its compliance with the Threshold Standards, including its ability to meet the standards in relation to delivery of higher education within Australia b. the scale and scope of offshore higher education operations conducted (for example the number of offshore locations, the range of third parties involved, and number of discipline areas in which courses of study are delivered offshore). 3. Where possible TEQSA will use information from other quality assurance or regulatory bodies in a host country to inform its regulatory decision-making. 4. TEQSA will seek evidence that student learning outcomes for courses of study delivered offshore are equivalent to those for the same or cognate course of study when delivered by the HEP at any other location. TEQSA s approach to the regulation of offshore HE provision 2

5. If a provider with self-accrediting authority is delivering courses of study leading to a regulated higher education award offshore, TEQSA will typically include at least one of these courses of study in the sample for assessment as part of a renewal of registration process. 6. Subject to the provisions of its Public Disclosure Policy, TEQSA will avoid the publication of information that may unnecessarily prejudice a provider s ability to operate in an offshore jurisdiction. 7. TEQSA s primary relationship is with a regulated higher education provider. TEQSA will take into account any known sensitivities involved in partnerships or other third party arrangements for offshore operations, and will normally use a provider as the intermediary for communication with a partner or third party about TEQSA s regulatory processes and when making arrangements to visit the partner/third party, where such visits are deemed necessary. Assessing offshore operations The Threshold Standards within the Higher Education Standards Framework include a range of provisions relevant to a provider s offshore operations. These have been identified and grouped according to seven high level themes, as outlined at Figure 1. These high level themes have then been split into 18 areas that may be relevant to explore when assessing offshore operations against the Threshold Standards. These areas will be applied using TEQSA s three regulatory principles regulatory necessity, reflecting risk, and proportionality. The nature of issues to explore and evidence requirements will vary depending on the context and circumstances of each case. Further information Further information about TEQSA s approach to the regulation of offshore provision can be obtained by contacting the relevant case manager or by directing an email enquiry to: enquiries@teqsa.gov.au. TEQSA s approach to the regulation of offshore HE provision 3

Figure 1: Assessment Themes Establishment Strategic Intent/Philosophy Due Diligence Formal approval and contractual arrangements Regulatory/Legislative Provisions Professional, statutory and regulatory requirements in Australia and in the host country Governance, Management and Staffing Governance, contract management and oversight Course approval and design Management and HR Delivery of HE Learning outcomes and assessment Admission, articulation, RPL and credit arrangements Academic standards and integrity Courses with major research components Teaching and learning quality Resources and support T&L resources and physical and ICT environment Management and administrative systems Responsibilities to Students Information to prospective students and stakeholders English language support Support and responsibilities to students Review and evaluation Review and evaluation processes and outcomes TEQSA s approach to the regulation of offshore HE provision 4