Principal Satisfaction Survey. March/April 2008



Similar documents
Dell Service & Support NYC DOE PCS Program

Bicycle Crash Data 2012

TEACHING COLLEGE SUCCESS SKILLS: Best Practices & Lesson Plans

New York State Profile

TEAC principles and standards for educational leadership programs

Department of English Language Learners and Student Support School Year Demographic Report

Bicycle Crash Data 2013

Fordham University Graduate School of Education

Timothy F. Lisante, Ph.D. Superintendent

QUALITYstarsNY Recruitment Project Evaluation Report

Get Us To College Proven strategies for helping NYC students navigate the college process

Strategic Plan A broadly-defined plan aimed at creating a desired future.

San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco County Office of Education Master Plan for Educational Technology DRAFT May 22, 2012

IBO. A Statistical Portrait of Uncertified Teachers in New York City Schools. New York City Independent Budget Office Policy Brief.

Graduate Teaching Fellowship Program. The Graduate School and University Center The City University of New York. Administrative Guidelines

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

TEAC principles and standards for teacher education programs

1. Student Teachers Page 2 2. Cooperating Teachers Page 5 3. Principals Page 7 4. Frequently Asked Questions Page 8

Teacher Tenure Policy and Process Overview for Principals. NYCDOE School Year

Standard Operating. The Referral, Evaluation, and Placement of School-Age Students with Disabilities. February 2009

HUMAN RESOURCES IN PUBLIC EDUCATION Where are we? Where should we be? Where HR Divisions should be. Where most HR Divisions are

OPIF. Organizational Change Readiness Questionnaire

U.S. Department of Education - EDCAPS G5-Technical Review Form (New)

Baltimore City Public Schools. City Schools District Office Organizational Structure for FY16

Office of Innovative School Models Persistently Lowest Achieving (PLA) Schools School Improvement Grant (SIG)

Curriculum Development, Revision, and Evaluation Processes

Twin Falls School District 411 Migrant Education Program. Updated September 3, 2013

Generation Next Leadership Council SPECIAL SESSION

Halifax County Public Schools. Business and Operations Administrator/Supervisor Evaluation and Final Evaluation Report

Education Collaborative Coordinated by the New York Immigration Coalition

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

IHE Masters of School Administration Performance Report


How To Improve Education Planning In Dekalb County Schools

Pennsylvania s Statewide System of School Support

I. Summary of Proposal

PROCEDURES AND EVALUATIVE GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION OF TERM FACULTY DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY MARCH 31, 2014

Best Practice: Strengthening Human Resources in Public School Systems

District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY HIGHLY QUALIFIED (HQ) RESOURCE GUIDE

MYTHS & REALITIES ABOUT COMMUNITY COLLEGE TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Attachment B. New York City LWIB Regional Plan PROGRAM YEAR 2013

School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING. Master of Arts in Teaching

Protocol for the Review of Distance and Correspondence Education Programs Effective July 5, 2006

The Mount Sinai Health System Is Formed to Provide Expanded Access to Primary, Specialty, and Ambulatory Care

IAC 7/2/08 Nursing Board[655] Ch 2, p.1. CHAPTER 2 NURSING EDUCATION PROGRAMS [Prior to 8/26/87, Nursing Board[590] Ch 2]

How to Build Effective Online Learner Support Services

REVERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework

Overview of OELL: Accomplishments, Challenges & Next Steps

Cost Guidelines for State Virtual Schools

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION OPTIONS

Distance Education Strategic Plan

Language Access Plan. A. Background

19K660. Brooklyn, NY Jocelyn Badette

Human Resource Management

The School District of Collier County Organizational Chart

Making Millions by Mining Management Competency Data

Molloy College Rockville Centre, New York COURSE OUTLINE. EDU 490 Visual Arts Education - Student Teaching

What to Expect: Your Guide to Affordable Housing

Regulation of the Chancellor

Strategic Plan San Luis Obispo County Community College District

Strategic Employee Onboarding: First Impressions Are Everything

School Counseling Frameworks

Houston Community College Transforms IT Systems to Improve Service and Efficiency

Network Directory. Note: No network may support more than 35 schools; growth past 30 schools is at the discretion of the cluster.

Planning for Success: Individual Plans of Study (IPS) and Career Advising Workshop

Atlanta Public Schools Fiscal Year Salary Schedule - Instructional Support (formerly the ST salary schedule)

Multi-Tiered System of Supports SITE-BASED INTEVENTION AND SUPPORTS GUIDANCE For Balanced Score Card Development

Director of Human Resources

Barrington Public Schools LEAPP Program

Minnetonka Public Schools Technology Plan

NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College

INSTITUTIONAL REPORT FOR CONTINUING ACCREDITATION: CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PATHWAY. Name of Institution Dates/Year of the Onsite Visit

TEAC Quality Principles for Educational Leadership

GROW. From Intuit QuickBooks to Microsoft Dynamics GP: A move that makes sense for growing businesses

Section I - How to Apply for Salary Step Placement for Teachers

ABOUT US. Our mission. Our vision

Transcription:

Principal Satisfaction Survey March/April 2008

Executive Summary Background Principal satisfaction is at the core of the Children First reforms our goal is to create a system of 1,400-plus great schools, not a great school system. To do this, we must give principals the resources and support they need to succeed. To fulfill this mission and continually improve service to schools, the Department will seek feedback from principals about its performance through online surveys. The first of these surveys was conducted in November 2007 and had a 7 response rate. The second of these surveys was conducted in March/April of 2008. More details are provided below on the second survey. Respondents The survey was voluntary and principals did not have to answer all of the questions. In total, 1,164 principals, or about, responded to the survey. Responses are anonymous and individual answers are not available to anyone. Based on pre-loaded information, we have the ability to combine answers of schools that have similar characteristics, e.g., SSO or ISC, to target areas that require increased attention and improvement. Survey Topics Based on principal and other feedback, the March/April survey was streamlined and covered the following topics: DOE overall general questions about the DOE. Academic services questions about the services provided to schools by the School Support Organizations, and the central offices of Teaching and Learning, Human Resources, and Labor Relations. Operational services questions about the services provided to schools by the Integrated Service Centers, and the central offices of facilities, food, pupil transportation, health, safety, finance, technology, family engagement, portfolio development, legal and compliance. - The survey also asked new questions regarding what services from the ISC and from the Department overall principals found to be most important. This feedback helped to inform planning for next school year. Accountability questions about the DOE s accountability tools and support functions. 2

Executive Summary (cont d) Highlights DOE Overall 76% (71% in Nov.) feel supported by the Department in attaining my overall goals for my school 79% (73% in Nov.) feel the Department has helped me to set clear measures of progress for student achievement Principals Core Team 95% (92% in Nov.) satisfied with the overall quality of support provided by my School Support Organization 81% (71% in Nov.) satisfied with the overall quality of support provided by my Integrated Service Center 85% (85% in Nov.) satisfied with the overall quality of support provided by my Senior Achievement Facilitator Accountability Tools 95% (94% in Nov.) understand the principles behind the DOE accountability tools (78% in Nov.) believe the overall set of accountability tools helps educators improve student outcomes 3

Sample Size and Response Rates Level of Analysis Organization Number of Responses Total Number Invited Response Rate City-wide NYC DOE 1164 1454 SSO Type (or district) LSO ESO PSO D75 630 374 127 33 747 486 164 58 84% 77% 77% 57% Individual SSOs CLSO ICI KNLSO LLSO ESO AED CEIPEA CUNY Fordham New Visions Replications 140 305 91 94 374 10 46 13 10 40 8 165 369 97 116 486 10 58 13 11 63 9 85% 83% 94% 81% 77% 79% 91% 63% 89% ISC Bronx Brooklyn Manhattan Queens Staten Island 267 190 209 281 218 339 242 272 344 258 79% 79% 77% 82% 84% Note: The small sample size of some individual SSOs and D75 may produce greater variation in survey results. 4

Satisfaction with the Department: Citywide How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the DOE? a. I feel supported by the Department in attaining my overall goals for my school March Percent 3 & 4: 76% November Percent 3 & 4: 71% % of Respondents 12% 64% 5% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree b. The Department has helped me to set clear measures of progress for student achievement March Percent 3 & 4: 79% November Percent 3 & 4: 73% % of Respondents 64% 15% 18% Note: Totals may not agree with charts due to rounding Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree 3% 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 5

Satisfaction with the Department: By ESO/LSO/PSO/D75 How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the DOE? a. I feel supported by the Department in attaining my overall goals for my school March Percent 3 & 4: 76% 72% 72% 77% 7 75% 71% 78% 63% D75 ESO LSO PSO b. The Department has helped me to set clear measures of progress for student achievement March Percent 3 & 4: 79% 71% 71% 78% 75% 78% 77% 63% D75 ESO LSO PSO 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 6

Satisfaction with the Department: By Individual SSO How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the DOE? a. I feel supported by the Department in attaining my overall goals for my school DOE-wide March Percent 3 & 4: 76% 9 7 5 83% 76% 7 76% 74% 67% 83% 63% 72% 72% 77% 5 66% 74% 71% 81% 75% 72% 75% 73% 86% 86% 3 1 AED CEIPEA CLSO CUNY D75 ESO Fordham ICI KNLSO LLSO New Visions Replications 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 7

Satisfaction with the Department: By Individual SSO How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the DOE? b. The Department has helped me to set clear measures of progress for student achievement DOE-wide March Percent 3 & 4: 79% 9 7 5 9 82% 83% 79% 78% 78% 71% 71% 63% 75% 72% 79% 74% 84% 79% 79% 73% 68% 71% 3 1 AED CEIPEA CLSO CUNY D75 ESO Fordham ICI KNLSO LLSO New Visions Replications 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 8

Satisfaction with Core Team Members: Citywide How satisfied are you with the overall QUALITY of support provided by the following members of your core team? a. School Support Organization (SSO) 92% 95% Percentage 3 &4 b. Integrated Service Center (ISC) 71% 81% Note: Charts reflect the fact that D75 schools are associated with ISCs and SAFs, but not with an SSO. 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 9

Satisfaction with Core Team Members: Citywide (cont d) How satisfied are you with the overall QUALITY of support provided by the following members of your core team? c. Senior Achievement Facilitator (SAF) 85% 85% Percentage 3 &4 d. District 75 94% 3 = Satisfied Note: Charts reflect the fact that D75 schools are associated with ISCs and SAFs, but not with an SSO 4 = Very Satisfied 10

Satisfaction with Core Team Members: By ESO/LSO/PSO/D75 How satisfied are you with the overall QUALITY of support provided by the following members of your core team? a. School Support Organization (SSO) b. Integrated Service Center (ISC) 95% 94% 95% 96% 91% 89% 75% 78% 7 82% 82% 65% 73% ESO LSO PSO ESO LSO PSO D75 c. Senior Achievement Facilitator (SAF) 95% 82% 79% 89% 89% 87% 74% Percentage 3 &4 ESO LSO PSO D75 Note: Charts reflect the fact that D75 schools are associated with ISCs and SAFs, but not with an SSO. 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 11

Satisfaction with Core Team Members: LSO How satisfied are you with the overall QUALITY of support provided by the following members of your core team? a. School Support Organization (SSO) 99% 97% 95% 93% 93% 95% 9 85% 9 85% 75% CLSO ICI KNLSO LLSO 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 12

Satisfaction with Core Team Members: PSO How satisfied are you with the overall QUALITY of support provided by the following members of your core team? a. School Support Organization (SSO) 9 85% 96% 89% 93% 9 97% 93% 7 5 3 1 AED CEIPEA CUNY Fordham New Visions Replications 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 13

Satisfaction with Integrated Service Center: By Borough How satisfied are you with the overall QUALITY of support provided by the following members of your core team? b. Integrated Service Center (ISC) March DOE-wide Percent 3 & 4: 81% 91% 72% 79% 82% 69% 68% 84% 65% 73% 84% Bronx Brooklyn Manhattan Queens Staten Island 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 14

Satisfaction with Integrated Service Center: Citywide How satisfied are you with the QUALITY of support provided by your ISC in the following areas? a. Budget b. Compliance c. Extended Use d. Facilities e. Grants f. Health g. Human Resources h. Legal i. Information Technology k. Payroll l. Procurement m. School Food n. School Safety o. Special Education Services p. Student Suspensions q. Test Administration r. Transportation s. Youth Development 9 j. Data Managers and Application Support Liaisons 7 5 3 1 a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. p. q. r. s. 71% 78% 71% 79% 79% 81% 87% 77% 83% 85% 81% 77% 73% 81% 68% 85% 9 83% 87% 82% 83% 92% 94% 84% 83% 9 92% 83% 84% 67% 76% 81% 78% 87% Note: For the March Survey, Data Managers and Application Support Liaisons were rated separately from IT. Thus, there is no comparison point for November. 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 15

Importance of the Integrated Service Center: Citywide Of the functions/roles in the ISC listed below, please rank on a scale of 1-5 their importance to your school. a. Professional Development Services offered by the ISC b. Budget c. Compliance d. Extended Use e. Facilities f. Grants g. Health h. Human Resources k. Payroll l. Procurement m. School Food n. School Safety o. Special Education Services p. Student Suspensions q. Test Administration r. Transportation s. Legal t. Youth Development i. Information Technology j. Data Managers and Application Support Liaisons Most Important Function/Role: Budget & HR (both at 81% 4 & 5) Percentage 4 & 5 81% 57% 28% 46% 37% 29% 81% 58% 53% 74% 73% 44% 64% 73% 57% 65% 45% 76% 5 a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. p. q. r. s. t. Note: This new question was introduced in March, therefore there is no comparison data from November. 5 = Most Important 16

Importance of Services Provided by the Department: Citywide Across the Department, of the services listed below, please rank on a scale of 1-5 their importance to your school. a. Professional Development in the Area of Academics b. Budget/Procurement c. Enrollment Operations d. Facilities Supports e. Family and Parent Leadership Supports f. Food Services k. Safety & Suspensions l. Test Administration m. Training on Accountability Tools n. Legal Supports o. Translation Services p. Youth Development g. Human Resources Services h. Labor Relations Supports i. IT Services j. Periodic Assessments Most Important Department Service: Budget/Procurement (82% 4 & 5) Percentage 4 & 5 67% 82% 63% 58% 49% 78% 71% 59% 53% 62% 62% 63% 75% 38% 49% a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. p. Note: This new question was introduced in March, therefore there is no comparison data from November. 5 = Most Important 17

Teaching and Learning Professional Development Offerings: Citywide How satisfied are you with the QUALITY of professional development services offered to your school by the Division of Teaching and Learning in the following subject areas? a. Academic Interventions b. English Language Arts c. Math d. Social Studies e. Science f. Health Education g. Fitness h. Library i. Instructional Technology j. Arts k. SPED l. ELL m. Mentoring/New Teacher Development (from the Division of Human Resources) Acad Int ELA Math Soc Stud Sci Health Fitness Library IT Arts SPED ELL Mentor 84% 87% 87% 81% 75% 78% 81% 78% 86% 77% 78% 82% 81% 75% 79% 75% 77% 71% 77% 83% 73% 81% 78% Note: Based on principal and other feedback, the wording of this question was changed from How satisfied are you with the QUALITY of professional development opportunities available to your school (as listed in the professional development catalogs sent to your school) in the following areas?. This may have impacted the results and comparability. Mentoring/New Teacher Development was introduced in March, and therefore has no comparison point in November. 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 18

Teaching and Learning Supports: Citywide How satisfied are you with the QUALITY of the services provided by the following offices in the central Division of Teaching and Learning? 76% 78% 74% 67% 55% 61% The Office of Arts and Special Projects The Office of English Language Learners The Office of Special Education Initiatives Note: Based on principal and other feedback, this question was changed from How satisfied are you with the core curricula in terms of effectiveness for student learning? This may impact the comparability of results. 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 19

Satisfaction with HR Systems: Citywide How would you rate the effectiveness of the following HR systems? 86% 86% 86% 85% 82% 82% 91% 92% 96% 96% 75% 76% a. HR Connect (call center for all DOE employees) b. Open Market Transfer System c. Fellow Finder d. Recruitment Management System e. Principal s Corner (part of DOE Intranet) f. Tenure Notification System 3 = Effective 4 = Very Effective 20

Satisfaction with School Support Services: Citywide How satisfied are you with the QUALITY of the services from central in the following areas related to facilities, food, and transportation in your school? a. Custodial services b. Repair and maintenance services for my school s physical structure/facilities c. School construction team (SCA project manager, construction manager, contractor, community relations manager) d. Food in the school cafeteria e. Food staff in the school cafeteria f. General education busing service g. Special education busing service 83% 69% 66% 74% 74% 82% 83% 71% 81% 71% 61% 59% 63% a. b. c. d. e. f. g. 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 21

Satisfaction with Health and Safety: Citywide How satisfied are you with the following related to health and safety in your school? a. My school nurse b. Support services provided by the central office when a significant safety issue arises c. Service provided by my School Safety personnel 78% 77% 76% 84% 71% 74% a. b. c. 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 22

Satisfaction with Technology: Citywide How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the services or potential services provided by DIIT? a. I consult with the Division of Instructional & Information Technology (DIIT) and/or the ISC Technology Teams on the technology planning for my school b. The Help Desk self-help facility (to enter problem tickets; find out the status of a previously reported problem) is easy to use (leave blank if you have never used) c. The available menu of technology options supports the instructional vision for my school d. My school's telephone vendor is responsive in requests made for phone moves and repair issues 85% 77% 68% 69% 44% 49% 56% a. b. c. d. 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 23

Satisfaction with Technology: Citywide How satisfied are you with the following DIIT and vendor services? 81% 86% 83% 88% a. Dell on-site support b. DIIT Help Desk responses to questions 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 24

Satisfaction with Technology: Citywide How satisfied are you with the following applications as they relate to your staff carrying out their day-today work? a. The Outlook E-mail and Calendaring System b. Automate the Schools (ATS) c. Student Information System (SIS) d. Basic Educational Data System (BEDS) Survey e. Telephone system 91% 94% 9 89% 86% 86% 85% 86% 73% 66% a. b. c. d. e. Note: There is no data available on HSST due to an error with the survey tool. We will capture this data in the next survey. 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 25

Satisfaction with Family Engagement: Citywide How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding family engagement? a. The support I receive from my Parent Coordinator significantly helps me to attain my school s overall goals 84% 84% Percentage 3 &4 b. Office of Family Engagement & Advocacy (OFEA) staff are responsive to my questions/issues 76% 79% 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 26

Satisfaction with Translations and Interpretation: Citywide How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding translations and interpretation services? a. I know what translations services are available for my school and how to access them 9 91% Percentage 3 &4 b. The Office of Translations and Interpretations is able to translate everything I need (all languages) 86% 82% Percentage 3 &4 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 27

Building Council Schools: Relationships Between Schools On Your Campus Of the items listed below, please rank on a scale of 1-5 their importance to your school. a. The Campus Management Memo b. The Building Council Toolkit c. Network Leaders and SSOs d. An Intermediary Partner e. A Community-Based Organization Partner f. Visits by Central Staff g. Workshops h. Colleague Principals Most Important Building Council Tool: Funding (87% 4 & 5) i. Funding j. Space Planner 9 87% 7 7 79% Percentage 4 & 5 5 3 23% 24% 27% 5 19% 46% 5 1 a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. 5 = Most Important 28

Satisfaction with Labor Relations: Citywide How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding labor relations? a. I am given sufficient support and information to guide tenure decisions 93% 84% Percentage3&4 b. I am given sufficient support and information to address low-performing employees 85% 74% Percentage3&4 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 29

Satisfaction with Labor Relations: Citywide (cont d) How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding labor relations? c. My questions involving labor contracts or grievance issues are answered in a timely and satisfactory manner 84% 91% Percentage 3 &4 d. Overall, I receive sufficient support and information regarding labor issues 9 81% Percentage 3 &4 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 30

Satisfaction with Legal, Compliance, and Audit: Citywide How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding legal, compliance, and audit? a. Legal staff responds to questions and/or requests in a timely manner 88% 92% Percentage 3 &4 b. Legal support is of high quality 89% 93% 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 31

Satisfaction with Legal, Compliance, and Audit: Citywide (cont d) How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding legal, compliance, and audit? c. Compliance support is of high quality 85% 81% Percentage 3 &4 d. Audit support and internal controls training is of high quality 82% Percentage3&4 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 32

Satisfaction with Accountability: Citywide How satisfied are you with the QUALITY of support provided by your SAF in the following areas? a. Training in the use of accountability tools b. Guidance in the development of my school s Inquiry Team 85% 83% 86% 84% c. Other supports (e.g., problem-solving issues, facilitating feedback to the Office of Accountability) 84% 82% Percentage3&4 3 = Satisfied 4 = Very Satisfied 33

Satisfaction with Accountability: Citywide How satisfied are you with the QUALITY and RESPONSIVENESS of support provided by the Office of Accountability in the following areas? 82% 77% 72% 73% 75% 75% 73% 75% 73% a. Quality Review b. Progress Report c. Periodic Assessments d. Learning Environment Survey e. ARIS f. Inquiry Team process 3 = Satisfied Note: Periodic assessments applies only to elementary and middle schools; Progress report question not applicable to D75 schools. 4 = Very Satisfied 34

Satisfaction with Accountability: Citywide How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the accountability tools as a whole, including the Inquiry Team process? a. I understand the principles behind the DOE accountability tools b. I believe the overall set of accountability tools helps educators improve student outcomes c. The accountability tools have increased my school s capacity to collect and use data in instructional decisionmaking d. The Office of Accountability responds to questions and/or requests in a timely manner e. The ARIS training I received was helpful 94% 95% 78% 82% 72% 77% 68% 52% a. b. c. d. e. Note: The November data for question e. reflects all schools, excluding D75. March data for question e. reflects ONLY D75, And, therefore is NOT comparable to November. Only D75 schools had ARIS training since the date of the November survey. 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree 35