Policy Research CENTER



Similar documents
Incentives for Truck Use of SH 130 Final report PRC 14-23F

Technical Report Documentation Page. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-13/

FINAL REPORT DEVELOPMENT OF CONGESTION PERFORMANCE MEASURES USING ITS INFORMATION. Sarah B. Medley Graduate Research Assistant

Intersection Cost Comparison Spreadsheet User Manual ROUNDABOUT GUIDANCE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 3 - GPS Data Collection Description and Validation

ExpressLanes CAG Summit. March 2, 2010

Economic Analysis Reports: Briefing. Transportation Finance Panel

Journal Vol 37 / Issue No.2

Florida s Turnpike System Customer Mix

The Role of Speed Governors in Truck Safety Industry Speed Governor Use Survey. Preliminary Analysis

EPA/NHTSA Phase 2 Fuel Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Standards for Heavy-Duty Trucks: Projected Effect on Freight Costs

The Impact of Freight Delay to Economic Productivity April 2014

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Five Ways to Reduce Fuel Consumption Using GPS Tracking

Lone Star Regional Rail Project - Update. Joseph Black Rail Director, Lone Star Rail District Joseph Lessard Planning Director, Knudson LP

Network development and design

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

The Impact of Electronic Toll Collection on Fleet Managers and Leasing Companies

EPA/NHTSA Phase 2 Fuel Efficiency & GHG Standards for Freight Trucks:

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Prioritization: Responding to Regional and National Trends and Demands Jeremy Sage

E. Summary of Existing Traffic Characteristics (Primary Focus Highways)

A Case for Real-Time Monitoring of Vehicular Operations at Signalized Intersections

ITS Georgia Presentation Mike Holt, PE, PTOE World Fiber Technologies January 28, 2011

14,449. Atlanta / Beaumont / Lufkin / Paris / Tyler Region. How was the survey taken? Do you own or lease a personal vehicle?

By Anthony Downs Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution. March 19, 2002

Overview... Bus Options... Carpooling, Biking or Walking to School... Driving to Campus: The Loop... The Queue: Managing Lincoln Ave Traffic...

Stone Way N Rechannelization: Before and After Study. N 34th Street to N 50th Street

Economic Impact. of Public Transportation Investment 2014 UPDATE

Nationwide Fixed Guideway

REDUCING THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF FREIGHT MOVEMENT THROUGH ECO-DRIVING

Chapter 5 Financial Plan

Cost and Financial Analysis

How To Plan A City Of Korea

Final Draft Final Report on

2013 Benefit-Cost Analyses Guidance for TIGER Grant Applicants

Big Data in Automotive Applications: Cloud Computing Based Velocity Profile Generation for Minimum Fuel Consumption

TECHNIQUES FOR MANUALLY ESTIMATING ROAD USER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

APPENDIX G OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST ESTIMATION MODEL

top issues An annual report

Virtual Weigh Stations in California: A Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Results and Opportunities Incorporating Behavioral Economics in Vehicle Use and Parking Pricing Deployments Under the Value Pricing Pilot Program

HRTAC Regional Financial Plan Initial Scenarios. November 19, 2015

Life-cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Alternatives for Accommodating Heavy Truck Traffic in the Las Vegas Roadway Network

Fowler Distributing Company Logistics Network Routing Analysis. Anthony Vatterott, Brian Vincenz, Tiffany Bowen. Executive Summary

MBA Teaching Note Net Present Value Analysis of the Purchase of a Hybrid Automobile 1

6. Cost Summary and Analysis This chapter summarizes and analyzes the cost estimates from previous chapters.

Customer Satisfaction Index 2014

Reduce your fleet costs in nine simple steps

TMC FINANCIAL POLICIES FOR SUBCONTRACTORS & CONSULTANTS

Sustainable Freight Transportation Systems: Operations, Technology and Policy

Demand for Long Distance Travel

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

Appendix J Santa Monica Travel Demand Forecasting Model Trip Generation Rates

TRANSPORT INDUSTRY COUNCIL

Moving Texas Exports. Examining the role of transportation in the electronic instrument export supply chain. Policy Research CENTER TRANSPORTATION

BEST PRACTICES & RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OPTIMIZING YOUR FUEL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Transit in the United States 3. Operating Costs and Performance Measures 13. Quality of Transit Service 19. ADA Compliance Bus 28

HOT Lanes in Houston Six Years of Experience

Comparing Arterial Speeds from Big-Data Sources in Southeast Florida (Bluetooth, HERE and INRIX)

Nearly 38,000 vehicles cross the Shinnecock Canal on Sunrise Highway (NYS Route 27) daily, during peak summer months.

Appendix C: Toll Sensitivity Analysis

Top Five Fleet Tracking Benefits for the Electrical Industry

Advanced Light-Duty Powertrain and Hybrid Analysis (ALPHA) Tool User s Guide for Off-Cycle Credit Evaluation

A Presentation by the Project Managers: Rick Canizales Prince William County. Jana Lynott, AICP Northern Virginia Transportation Commission

Drivewyze Toll Evolution

ITS Devices Used to Collect Truck Data for Performance Benchmarks

Simulating Traffic for Incident Management and ITS Investment Decisions

A 2015 Surface Transportation Primer

ESTIMATING FREIGHT COSTS OVER A MULTI-MODAL NETWORK: AN AUTO INDUSTRY SUPPLY CHAIN EXAMPLE

Performance Measures for RIDOT s Traffic Management Center

Vehicle and Equipment Policy & Procedure Manual

SELF-DRIVING FREIGHT IN THE FAST LANE

HRTAC Regional Financial Planning. October 29, 2015

K. G. Duleep President, H-D Systems Presented at the Michelin Bibendum Berlin, May 2011

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

TITLE 13. LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, CHAPTER 18 SUBCHAPTER 1. PERMITS FOR OVERDIMENSIONAL OR OVERWEIGHT VEHICLES

CENTRAL TEXAS TURNPIKE SYSTEM 2012 TRAFFIC AND REVENUE FORECAST

Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Freight Movement through Eco- Driving Programs for Heavy- Duty Trucks

Ohio Standard Small/Medium MPO Travel Demand Forecasting Model. Theoretical Training May 10-11, 2006 Abridged to Freight Focus Sept 2010

American Fast Freight

Dallas-Fort Worth Area Major Transportation Projects

Self-Driving Cars. Pete Gauthier & David Sibley EIS Section 1 Mini-Project 10/8/2012

Mexico Shipments Made Simple. Third-party logistics providers help streamline the U.S. Mexico cross-border process WHITE PAPER

Split Lane Traffic Reporting at Junctions

Estimating the effect of projected changes in the driving population on collision claim frequency

Using Big Data and Efficient Methods to Capture Stochasticity for Calibration of Macroscopic Traffic Simulation Models

EFFECT OF OREGON S AXLE-WEIGHT-DISTANCE TAX INCENTIVE

Percent change. Rank Most expensive states Average expenditure Rank Least expensive states Average expenditure

Joint Channel Forecast Model 2015 Conducted by IHS-Polk

Virtual Weigh Stations: The Business Case

OOIDA Corporate Supporter Membership Program. An invitation to reach the nation s small-business owner-operators. OOIDA

USING ROUTING SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION COSTS, DEFININGPROCUREMENT AREAS & ROUTES

Nissan Hypermini Urban Electric Vehicle Testing

SU R F A C E T R A N S P O R T A T I O N I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S I S A

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Fleet Optimization with IBM Maximo for Transportation

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Engineering (Rating Assigned November 2015)

Parking Management. Index. Purpose. Description. Relevance for Large Scale Events. Options. Technologies. Impacts. Integration potential

About the Model. Unit. Cost Structure. Modal Characteristics

Auto. The Instant Insurance Guide: What To Do If You re In An Accident. Info and tips for buying automobile and motorcycle insurance in Delaware

Transcription:

TRANSPORTATION Policy Research CENTER Truck Travel Cost Estimates on Tolled and Non-tolled Facilities A Central Texas Case Study Executive Summary Texas has actively pursued tolling as a means to provide additional highway capacity sooner. In some cases, toll roads are motivated by the need for additional capacity to bypass congested urban areas. This policy brief supplements the Texas A&M Transportation Institute research report titled Incentives for Truck Use of SH 130, which attempted to increase the understanding of the behavioral responses of the trucking industry to tolls. This supplemental effort delves deeper into the financial factors that influence the business decisions of trucking companies to use toll roads. Factors Influencing Toll Road Use Research has found that a number of factors influence whether a trucking company will use a tolled route alternative. These include: Travel time (or travel speed). Distance traveled. Toll rates and whether the toll charged can be recovered from the customer. Vehicle and driver costs. Costs of Truck Travel for Various Scenarios The study team developed a truck travel cost equation to provide a reasonable estimate of the cost of truck travel considering average travel speed, distance, applicable toll charges, and truck operating costs. The equation was applied to various scenarios: Making two different trips: o Georgetown to San Marcos. o Georgetown to the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport. Operating on two different highways: o The non-tolled I-35. o The tolled State Highway (SH) 130. Using various speeds and toll rates. Different toll rate scenarios were used to determine the effect of different hypothetical toll discount programs on the costs of truck travel. The three toll rate scenarios were: The current truck rate. The current car rate. No toll.

The results showed that for the Georgetown to San Marcos trip, the non-tolled facility (I-35) was less expensive than the tolled facility (SH 130 and SH 45) at all times of the day and given all three toll rate scenarios (i.e., even when the tolls on SH 130 and SH 45 were removed). On the other hand, the study found that for the Georgetown to the Austin-Bergstrom Airport trip, the tolled facility (SH 130 and SH 71) was less expensive than the non-tolled facility (I-35 and SH 71) under the following conditions: During the PM peak if the truck tolls were reduced to the car toll rate. During all times of day if the truck tolls were removed. However, at the current truck toll rate, the tolled facility was always more expensive than using I-35 during all time periods. Impact on Trucking Companies Trucking companies are cost sensitive and evaluate different route options for each trip to determine the most cost-effective route given the requirements of the delivery. Tolled facilities will only be used for trips where the tolled facility is more cost effective than the non-tolled facility or in situations where the delivery requires and the toll road offers a faster travel speed (e.g., when the trucking company needs to meet a specific delivery window). The calculations conducted in this study are an attempt to improve the understanding of the costs incurred by trucking companies and the associated impact on a trucker s routing decisions. Specifically, the truck travel cost equation can simulate the effect of travel speeds and toll discount programs on truck travel costs. This can give an indication of how different travel speeds and toll rates can impact truck use of tolled facilities. Introduction Roads are a key element of any region s transportation infrastructure. Today s road system allows unprecedented levels of mobility, accessibility, and economic growth. But costs associated with inadequate road infrastructure can amount to billions of dollars. In 2011 alone, truck congestion costs were estimated at $27 billion nationally (1). Texas has actively pursued tolling as a means to provide additional highway capacity sooner. In some cases, toll roads are motivated by the need for additional capacity to bypass congested urban areas. For example, State Highway (SH) 130 was envisioned as a potential bypass around the Austin downtown area for through truck trips. Cost is often cited as a reason for trucks to not use SH 130 instead of parallel, non-tolled facilities, such as I-35. The Texas A&M Transportation Institute research report titled Incentives for Truck Use of SH 130 (2) attempted to increase the understanding of the behavioral responses of the trucking industry to tolls. In particular, the report looked at the use of SH 130 (i.e., traffic and transaction data), factors trucking companies consider in making decisions about toll road use, and past incentives or discount programs to encourage truck traffic on SH 130. 2

This supplemental report delves deeper into the financial factors that influence the business decisions of trucking companies to use toll roads. The study team developed a truck travel cost equation and applied it to: Making two different trips: o Georgetown to San Marcos. o Georgetown to the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport. Operating on two different highways: o The non-tolled I-35. o The tolled State Highway (SH) 130. Using various speeds and toll rates. The result of this research is an attempt to improve the understanding of costs incurred by trucking companies and the associated impact on a trucker s routing decisions, specifically for SH 130 and I-35. Factors Influencing the Decision to Use Tolled versus Non-tolled Facilities Research has found that a number of factors influence whether a trucking company will use a tolled route facility. These include: Travel time (or travel speed). Distance traveled. Toll rates and whether the toll charged can be recovered from the customer. Vehicle and driver costs. The literature revealed that truckers will choose to pay a toll only if it makes financial sense. That is, the rates paid by the customer must allow the trucking company to recover the increased operating costs associated with using the toll facility, or the savings in operating costs (time, fuel, etc.) must exceed the additional cost imposed by the toll. In general, the trucking sector is exceptionally cost conscious. This is because a large part of the sector is operating at low margins because it is very difficult to differentiate companies based on service performance. Hence, competition tends to focus on price. Trucking companies thus manage: Costs, including the price and the volume. Productivity, including driver and equipment utilization. The time required to deliver reliable service, such as given appointment times and hours of driver service, and/or better productivity (after-hour deliveries). The price charged to the customer, including the cost of using a tolled facility, which may not be recoverable for competitive reasons. 3

The following subsections examine: The travel speed on I-35, SH 71, SH 45, and SH 130. The tolls charged on SH 130. Truck operating costs (vehicle and driver) in the southwest United States. Travel Speed Travel speed influences the cost of truck travel. In general, the cost of truck travel (both fuel consumption and maintenance) increases as truck travel speed increases, but the company can make faster deliveries and/or more deliveries, increasing the productivity of the vehicle and driver. On the other hand, congestion (slower travel speeds) increases the labor costs of truck travel and reduces vehicle productivity because fewer deliveries can be made. Table 1 lists the estimated average travel speed on I-35, SH 71, SH 130, and SH 45 in Central Texas. The INRIX data used to calculate the average travel speeds on I-35 and SH 71 represent average weekday travel speeds in 2012. The time periods are defined as follows: AM peak period 6:15 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. PM peak period 3:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Off-peak period all hours outside the AM and PM peak periods. Table 1. Travel Speeds. Road and Location * Off-Peak (mph) AM Peak (mph) PM Peak (mph) I-35** 61.3 50.5 39.3 SH 71*** 54 50.3 45.6 SH 130 (5 axles) 66 66 66 SH 45 66 66 66 *Speeds on non-tolled roads are not differentiated between cars and trucks. **Speeds were measured from SH 130 in Georgetown to SH 80 in San Marcos. ***Speeds were measured from I-35 to SH 130. The average travel speed on SH 130 was based on toll transaction records from April 2013 when the speed limit was 80 mph on segments 1 through 4. Over 700 transactions for five-axle trucks were examined to calculate the average travel speed of 66 mph on SH 130. The average travel speeds on SH 130 for five-axle trucks were consistent throughout the day with no variation between off-peak and peak-period travel speeds. The average travel speeds on SH 45 were assumed to be the same as that on SH 130. The travel speeds included in Table 1 were used to estimate the total driver-based. Tolls on SH 130 Figure 1 shows a map of SH 130 and I-35 in Central Texas. I-35, the non-tolled facility, passes directly through Austin. SH 130, the tolled facility, connects with I-35 near Georgetown, goes 4

around Austin, and then connects to SH 45, which reconnects with I-35 south of Austin near Buda. This loop around Austin via SH 130 is 12 miles longer than the I-35 facility. SH 130 also extends further south from SH 45 to Seguin a total distance of approximately 90 miles. Source: (3) Figure 1. Segments of SH 130 and I-35 through Austin. SH 130 has six mainline toll plazas and is divided into segments 1 to 4 and segments 5 and 6 (see Figure 1). Segments 1 to 4 were opened in the mid-2000s, and segments 5 and 6 were opened in 2013. Toll rates are different for each segment of SH 130 and for cars and trucks. The actual toll charged on SH 130 varies based on where traffic enters and exits the highway. The current tolls for a through trip for five-axle trucks (Class C) are: For segments 1 to 4 (46 miles), $21.00 with a TxTag 1 or $27.92 paying by mail (4). For segments 5 and 6 (41 miles), $27.95 with a TxTag and $32.03 paying by mail (5). Trucks with six axles (Class E) often pay a slightly higher rate. 1 A TxTag is a sticker that drivers place on their windshield that is scanned while passing through tolls without stopping. Users charge their account so that tolls are prepaid. 5

Truck Operating Costs Obtaining operating costs for trucks is a complex process. There are many sources for this information, but very few are comprehensive and consider all the factors that contribute to truck operating costs. The American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) has been conducting comprehensive research on this topic since 2008 and is the best public source for the cost of truck travel. The 2013 ATRI study 1 on the operational costs of trucking consisted of a survey that gathered information on the cost of truck travel (6). It divided costs into two main categories and multiple subcategories: Vehicle based: o Fuel costs. o Truck/trailer lease or purchase payments. o Repair and maintenance. o Truck insurance premiums. o Permits and licenses. o Tires. o Tolls. 2 Driver based: o Wages. o Benefits. The 2013 update grouped survey respondents based on region, with Texas included in the Southwest region. Operating costs for Southwest region trucks, averaged across all commodities, are listed in Table 2. Specifically: The total 2013 operating costs were $64.31 per hour and $1.61 per mile. Vehicle-based costs were $42.76 per hour and $1.07 per mile. Driver-based costs were $21.55 per hour and $0.54 per mile. 1 A 2014 update of An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking exists. However, it provides marginal costs, not average costs needed for this analysis. For more information, see the 2014 update at http://atri-online.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/09/atri-operational-costs-of-trucking-2014-final.pdf. 2 Toll costs were excluded from the operating costs listed in Table 2 because the specific toll rates in Central Texas were considered in the truck travel cost calculations. 6

Table 2. Truck Operating Costs for the Southwest Region. Cost Component $/hour 1 $/ vehicle mile 2013 Vehicle Based Fuel costs 24.39 0.61 Truck/trailer lease or purchase payments 8.46 0.212 Repair and maintenance 4.72 0.118 Truck insurance premiums 2.23 0.056 Permits and licenses 1.08 0.027 Tires 1.88 0.047 Subtotal 42.76 1.07 Driver Based Driver wages 16.71 0.42 Driver benefits 4.84 0.12 Subtotal 21.55 0.54 Total 64.31 1.61 2014 2 Vehicle-based costs per mile 1.09 Driver-based costs per hour 21.91 Source for 2013 data: (6) Truck Travel Cost Equation An equation was developed to provide a reasonable estimate for the cost of truck travel through the Austin area considering truck operating costs, average travel speed, and applicable toll charges. The equation is as follows: Cost = $1.09 miles + $21.91 miles NT α NT Where: Cost = cost of the trip for a five-axle truck. + $21.91 miles T α T + TollRate 1 Operating costs per hour for the Southwest region were estimated by calculating the ratio of Southwest average cost per vehicle mile to U.S. average cost per vehicle mile and multiplying this ratio by the U.S. average cost per hour for all cost components. This assumes that the ratio of Southwest average cost per vehicle mile to U.S. average cost per vehicle mile is the same as the ratio of Southwest average cost per hour to U.S. average cost per hour across all components. 2 Vehicle-based costs per mile and driver-based costs per hour from 2013 were inflated to estimate 2014 costs using the Producer Price Index for Truck Transportation. For more information, see http://data.bls.gov/cgibin/surveymost?pc. 7

$1.09 = vehicle-based costs per mile (see Table 2). miles = total number of miles traveled by truck. T = tolled road. NT = non-tolled road. $21.91 = driver-based costs per hour (see Table 2). α = speed of travel. TollRate = toll rate for the segment traveled on the tolled road. Trip Scenarios Total truck trip costs considering truck operating costs, average travel speeds, and applicable toll rates were calculated for two trip scenarios using this equation. For each of the trip scenarios, two routes were considered: the tolled SH 130 and the non-tolled I-35. 1 Georgetown to San Marcos The first trip scenario starts at the north end of SH 130 in Georgetown and ends in San Marcos. Two routes are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. 1 For all examples, the toll rate used was the rate with a TxTag. The toll rate is higher without a TxTag. For more information, see https://www.txtag.org/en/tollcalc/site.html. 8

Source: Google Maps Figure 2. Georgetown to San Marcos Using I-35. Source: Google Maps Figure 3. Georgetown to San Marcos Using SH 130, SH 45, and I-35. Cost and Travel Time on the Non-tolled Facility In this route scenario, a five-axle truck travels from the north end of SH 130 in Georgetown to San Marcos using I-35 (see Figure 2 for a map) during the off-peak period (all hours outside of the AM [6:15 a.m. to 10:15 a.m.] and PM [3:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.] peak periods). This is a distance of 60.1 miles at an average travel speed of 61.3 mph (see Table 1). Using these data, the estimated travel time is 59 minutes, and the total estimated truck trip cost is $86.99, calculated as follows: Cost = $1.09 60.1 + $21.91 60.1 61.3 = $86.99 Cost and Travel Time on the Tolled Facility This trip uses SH 130 and SH 45 between Georgetown and San Marcos to bypass Austin (see Figure 3 for a map). In this route scenario, a five-axle truck travels from the north end of SH 130 in Georgetown to San Marcos using SH 130, SH 45, and a section of I-35 during the off-peak 9

period. This is a total distance of 71.7 miles. The distance on SH 130 and SH 45 is approximately 53.8 miles, and the average travel speed is 66 mph (see Table 1). The distance on I-35 from the end of SH 45 to San Marcos is approximately 17.9 miles, and the average travel speed is 61.3 mph. The tolls on SH 130 and SH 45 are $24.12. Using these data, the estimated travel time is 66 minutes, and the total cost of the trip is $126.53, calculated as follows: Cost = $1.09 71.7 + Result $21.91 17.9 61.3 + $21.91 53.8 66 + $24.12 = $126.53 Between Georgetown and San Marcos, the non-tolled facility (I-35) is faster (59 minutes versus 67 minutes) and costs less ($86.99 versus $126.53) than the tolled facility during the off-peak period. Comparison of Travel Times Table 3 and Figure 4 show the travel times using the non-tolled (I-35) and the tolled (SH 130, SH 45, and a section of I-35 that is not tolled) facilities between Georgetown and San Marcos. Shorter travel times are highlighted in blue in Table 3. Specifically: During the morning peak, travel time on the tolled facility is 1 minute faster than on I-35. During the evening peak, travel time on the tolled facility is 20 minutes faster than on I-35. During the off-peak, travel time on the tolled facility is 7 minutes slower than on I-35. Table 3. Travel Time on Tolled and Non-tolled Facility (Georgetown to San Marcos). Time of Day Tolled Facility (SH 130, SH 45, and I-35) Off-peak 66 minutes 59 minutes AM peak 70 minutes 71 minutes PM peak 72 minutes 92 minutes Non-tolled Facility (I-35) 10

Trip Cost Travel Time (minutes) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Non-tolled route SH 130 Off-peak AM peak PM peak Comparison of Trip Costs Figure 4. Travel Time on SH 130 and I-35 (Georgetown to San Marcos). Figure 5 illustrates the cost of using the tolled and non-tolled facility from Georgetown to San Marcos during three time periods (i.e., AM peak, PM peak, and off-peak) at the current truck toll rates on SH 130 and SH 45. At current truck toll rates, using SH 130 and SH 45 is more expensive than using I-35 during all three time periods. The greatest difference is during the offpeak period when it is $39.54 more expensive to use the tolled facility than to use I-35. $140.00 $120.00 Non-tolled route SH 130 $100.00 $80.00 $60.00 $40.00 $20.00 $0.00 Off-peak AM peak PM peak Figure 5. Trip Cost on Tolled and Non-tolled Facility at Current Truck Toll Rates (Georgetown to San Marcos). 11

Table 4 shows the trip cost on the tolled and non-tolled facility for three toll rate scenarios: The current truck rate. The current car rate. No toll. The trip cost was calculated for the off-peak, AM peak, and PM peak periods. The less expensive route choice is highlighted in blue in Table 4. In all cases, during both peak and off-peak periods, the tolled facility was more expensive than I-35, even when the truck toll was removed on SH 130 and SH 45. Table 4. Truck Trip Cost of Tolled and Non-tolled Facility under Different Toll Rate Scenarios (Georgetown to San Marcos). Time of Day Off-peak AM peak PM peak Truck Toll Amount Tolled Facility (SH 130, SH 45, and I-35) Non-tolled Facility (I-35) Truck rate ($24.12) $126.53 $86.99 Car rate ($8.04) $110.45 $86.99 None ($0) $102.41 $86.99 Truck rate ($24.12) $127.90 $91.58 Car rate ($8.04) $111.82 $91.58 None ($0) $103.78 $91.58 Truck rate ($24.12) $130.11 $99.02 Car rate ($8.04) $114.03 $99.02 None ($0) $105.99 $99.02 Georgetown to Austin-Bergstrom Airport The second trip scenario starts at the north end of SH 130 in Georgetown and ends at the Austin- Bergstrom Airport. Two routes are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7. 12

Source: Google Maps Figure 6. Georgetown to the Austin- Bergstrom Airport Using I-35 and SH 71. Source: Google Maps Figure 7. Georgetown to the Austin-Bergstrom Airport Using SH 130 and SH 71. Cost and Travel Time on the Non-tolled Facility On this route, a five-axle truck travels from the north end of SH 130 in Georgetown to the Austin-Bergstrom Airport using I-35 and SH 71 (see Figure 6 for a map) during the off-peak period. This is a distance of approximately 34.5 miles on I-35 and 6.7 miles on SH 71. The average travel speed on I-35 is 61.3 mph, and the average travel speed on SH 71 is 54 mph during the off-peak period (see Table 1). Using these data, the estimated travel time is 41 minutes, and the total estimated truck trip cost is $59.96, calculated as follows: Cost = $1.09 41.2 + $21.91 34.5 61.3 + $21.91 6.7 54 = $59.96 13

Cost and Travel Time on the Tolled Facility This trip uses SH 130 and SH 71 from the north end of SH 130 in Georgetown to the Austin- Bergstrom Airport (see Figure 7 for a map). In this route scenario, a five-axle truck travels approximately 37.3 miles on SH 130 and 3.2 miles on SH 71 during the off-peak period. 1 During the off-peak period, the average travel speed on SH 130 is 66 mph, and the average travel speed on SH 71 is 54 mph (see Table 1). The toll for this segment of SH 130 is $15.75. Using these data, the estimated travel time is 37 minutes, and the total cost of the trip is $73.58, calculated as follows: Cost = $1.09 40.5 + Result $21.91 3.2 54 + $21.91 37.3 66 + $15.75 = $73.58 Between Georgetown and the Austin-Bergstrom Airport, the tolled facility (SH 130) is faster (37 minutes versus 41 minutes) but costs more ($73.58 versus $59.96) than the tolled facility during the off-peak period. Comparison of Travel Times Table 5 and Figure 8 show the travel times using the non-tolled (I-35) and the tolled (SH 130) facilities between Georgetown and the Austin-Bergstrom Airport. Shorter travel times are highlighted in blue in Table 5. Specifically: During the morning peak, travel time on the tolled facility is 12 minutes faster than on I-35. During the evening peak, travel time on the tolled facility is 23 minutes faster than on I-35. During the off-peak, travel time on the tolled facility is 4 minutes faster than on I-35. Table 5. Travel Time on Tolled and Non-tolled Facility (Georgetown to Austin-Bergstrom Airport). Time of Day Tolled Facility (SH 130 and SH 71) Non-tolled Facility (I-35 and SH 71) Off-Peak 37 minutes 41 minutes AM Peak 37 minutes 49 minutes PM Peak 38 minutes 61 minutes 1 SH 71 is a non-tolled route. A segment of SH 71 is used in both the non-tolled option and the tolled option. 14

Trip Cost Travel Time (minutes) 70 60 Non-tolled route SH 130 50 40 30 20 10 0 Off-peak AM peak PM peak Figure 8. Travel Time on I-35 and SH 130 (Georgetown to Austin-Bergstrom Airport). Comparison of Trip Costs Figure 9 illustrates the cost of using the tolled and non-tolled facility from Georgetown to the Austin-Bergstrom Airport during three time periods (i.e., AM peak, PM peak, and off-peak) at the current truck toll rates on SH 130. At current truck toll rates, using SH 130 is more expensive than using I-35 during all three time periods. The greatest difference is during the off-peak period when it is $13.62 more expensive to use the tolled facility than to use I-35. $80.00 $70.00 $60.00 $50.00 $40.00 $30.00 $20.00 $10.00 $0.00 Non-tolled route SH 130 Off-Peak AM peak PM peak Figure 9. Trip Cost on Tolled and Non-tolled Facility at Current Truck Toll Rates (Georgetown to Austin-Bergstrom Airport). 15

Table 6 shows the trip cost on the tolled and non-tolled facility for three toll rate scenarios: The current truck rate. The current car rate. No toll. The trip cost was calculated for the off-peak, AM peak, and PM peak periods. The less expensive route choice is highlighted in blue in Table 6. The tolled facility is more expensive than I-35 at current truck toll rates during all time periods. If the truck toll rate is reduced to the car toll rate, then the tolled facility is less expensive than the non-tolled facility during the PM peak. Similarly, if the toll is removed, then the tolled facility is less expensive during all time periods. Table 6. Truck Trip Cost of Tolled and Non-tolled Facility under Different Toll Rate Scenarios (Georgetown to Austin-Bergstrom Airport). Time of Day Off-peak AM peak PM peak Truck Toll Amount Tolled Facility Non-tolled Facility (SH 130 and SH 71) (I-35 and SH 71) Truck rate ($15.75) $73.58 $59.96 Car rate ($5.25) $63.08 $59.96 No toll ($0) $57.83 $59.96 Truck rate ($15.75) $73.67 $62.79 Car rate ($5.25) $63.17 $62.79 None ($0) $57.92 $62.79 Truck rate ($15.75) $73.82 $67.36 Car rate ($5.25) $63.32 $67.36 None ($0) $58.09 $67.36 Conclusion This policy brief delved deeper into the financial factors that influence the use of toll roads by trucking companies. This effort aimed at further enhancing the understanding of the travel dynamics surrounding the use of toll roads by truckers. The study team compared the trip cost and travel times for trucks traveling on non-tolled and tolled facilities in Central Texas under different trip, travel speed, and toll rate scenarios. Specifically, the study evaluated two trip scenarios: Georgetown to San Marcos and Georgetown to the Austin-Bergstrom Airport, which involved traveling on sections of I-35 and SH 130. Prior research has found that a number of factors influence whether a trucking company will use a tolled route alternative, including: Travel time (or travel speed). Distance traveled. Toll rates and whether the toll charged can be recovered from the customer. Vehicle and driver costs. 16

The study team developed a truck travel cost equation that included each of these factors to simulate the financial considerations when a trucking company is faced with the decision to use a tolled (in this case SH 130) or non-tolled route. Different toll rate scenarios were used to determine the effect of different hypothetical toll discount programs on the costs of truck travel. The results showed that for the Georgetown to San Marcos trip, the non-tolled facility (I-35) was less expensive than the tolled facility (SH 130 and SH 45) at all times of the day and given all three toll rate scenarios (i.e., even when the tolls on SH 130 and SH 45 were removed). On the other hand, the study found that for the Georgetown to Austin-Bergstrom Airport trip, the tolled facility (SH 130 and SH 71) was less expensive than the non-tolled facility (I-35 and SH 71) under the following conditions: During the PM peak if the truck tolls were reduced to the car toll rate. During all times of day if the truck tolls were removed. However, at the current truck toll rate, the tolled facility was always more expensive than using I-35 during all time periods. Trucking companies are cost sensitive and evaluate different route options for each trip to determine the most cost-effective route given the requirements of the delivery. Tolled facilities will only be used for trips where the tolled facility is more cost effective than the non-tolled facility or in situations where the delivery requires and the toll road offers a faster travel speed (e.g., when the trucking company needs to meet a specific delivery window). The calculations conducted in this study can be used to simulate the effect of travel speeds and toll discount programs on truck travel costs and therefore the truck use of tolled facilities. References 1. D. Schrank, B. Eisele, and T. Lomax. 2012 Urban Mobility Report. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas, 2012. http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility-report-2012.pdf. Accessed February 2015. 2. T. Geiselbrecht, T. Baker, C. Beaty, N. Wood, B. Chigoy, S. Overmyer, and J. Prozzi. Incentives for Truck Use of SH 130. PRC 14-23F, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas, 2015. http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/prc-14-23-f.pdf. Accessed February 2015. 3. Texas Department of Transportation. Private Partnership Approved for State Highway 130. July 3, 2006. http://www.ntxe-news.com/cgibin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=21&num=35193. Accessed February 2015. 4. TxTag. Toll Calculator. https://www.txtag.org/en/tollcalc/site.html. Accessed February 2015. 17

5. SH 130 Toll. Toll Calculator. http://mysh 130.com/segments-5-6/toll-calculator. Accessed March 2015. 6. K. J. Fender and D. A. Pierce. An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking: A 2013 Update. American Transportation Research Institute, Arlington, Virginia, September 2013. http://truckexec.typepad.com/files/atri-operational-costs-of-trucking-2013-final.pdf. Accessed February 2015. 18