2. Please describe the project s alignment with the Common System Principles (Appendix 1).



Similar documents
IT Governance Overview

Audience: FAA Administration and partners with Service Level Agreements FAA Strategic Goal(s) Alignment:

IT Cost Reduction. Doing More with Less. Anita Ballaney, Vishwanath Shenoy, Michael Gavigan. Strategic IT cost reduction - Doing More with Less

INTERNAL SERVICES GROUP PMO

The following is intended to outline our general product direction. It is intended for information purposes only, and may not be incorporated into

HRMS - HRMS Charter - AI.18. Project Charter Human Resource Management System (HRMS) Replacement - Implementation Project Number: 2209.

CITY OF BOULDER IT GOVERNANCE AND DECISION-MAKING STRUCTURE. (Approved May 2011)

Process Improvement Plan

OE PROJECT CHARTER TEMPLATE

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT REQUESTS

Information Technology Governance Overview and Charter

ORIGINAL PLAN DATE: MARCH 1, 2012 REVISION DATE: REVISION:

Project, Program & Portfolio Management Help Leading Firms Deliver Value

University of Wisconsin Platteville IT Governance Model Final Report Executive Summary

5 FAM 670 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Writing an Asset Management System Business Case

IT GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN THE INSTITUTIONS WE HAVE AUDITED: LESSONS LEARNED

Real World Strategies for Migrating and Decommissioning Legacy Applications

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND ANALYSIS

COMMUNIQUE. Information Technology (IT) Governance Guidance

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Outline VERSION 0.0 STATUS: OUTLINE DATE:

IT Strategic Plan and Roadmap Governance and PMO Recommendations

Project Management Plan for

TDWI strives to provide course books that are content-rich and that serve as useful reference documents after a class has ended.

Enhancing Outsourcing Relationship Management Capabilities: Driving Greater Value from AllianceBernstein s Global Operations

IT Vendor Due Diligence. Jennifer McGill CIA, CISA, CGEIT IT Audit Director Carolinas HealthCare System December 9, 2014

Data Center Strategy and Services Experts. An Introduction to Move Methods ALTUS TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. September, 2009

Angelo State University

The IT Financial Management Challenge: Where Is the ROI? WHITE PAPER

CRM Business Plan Template Introduction: How to Use This Template

Assessing the Appropriate Level of Project, Program, and PMO Structure

WHY DO I NEED A PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE (AND HOW DO I GET ONE)?

Risk management and the transition of projects to business as usual

INTRODUCTION. Page 1 of 16

DEPARTMENT AGENCY STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES FOR CLOUD MIGRATION SERVICES: INVENTORY, APPLICATION MAPPING, AND MIGRATION PLANNING MONTH YYYY TEMPLATE

KMS Implementation Roadmap

CDC UNIFIED PROCESS JOB AID

Performance Audit Concurrent Review: ERP Pre-Solicitation

Mixed Life Cycle FY2002

Integrating Project Management and Service Management

Driving Excellence in Implementation and Beyond The Underlying Quality Principles

Journey to Cloud 10 Questions

CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE

ITIL Asset and Configuration. Management in the Cloud

Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Request for Proposal (RFP)

Risk Management Primer

Making the Business Case for IT Asset Management

Employing ITSM in Value Added Service Provisioning

Validating Enterprise Systems: A Practical Guide

AE Initiative Summary Business Case Data Center Aggregation

Organization. Project Name. Project Overview Plan Version # Date

Role and Skill Descriptions. For An ITIL Implementation Project

The Fast Track Project Glossary is organized into four sections for ease of use:

76a-WCM Brief March 07.pg 2 76b- WCM Brief June 08...pg 8

Cybersecurity Framework. Executive Order Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity

Driving Business Value. A closer look at ERP consolidations and upgrades

Project Management Fact Sheet:

Office of the Chief Information Officer

U.S. Department of the Treasury. Treasury IT Performance Measures Guide

DISCIPLINE DATA GOVERNANCE GOVERN PLAN IMPLEMENT

Enterprise Data Governance

DRAFT. Propose that environmental considerations be added to the list of strategic considerations.

Wednesday, April 15, :48 AM Page 1 of 5

Whitepaper: 7 Steps to Developing a Cloud Security Plan

Upgrade Business Intelligence Software

GEOSPATIAL LINE OF BUSINESS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS

Information Technology Services Project Management Office Operations Guide

Audit of Veterans Health Administration Blood Bank Modernization Project

TEMPLATE. U.S. Department of Energy. Project Name. Feasibility Study Report. September 2002 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Software Asset Management on System z

MINNESOTA STATE POLICY

Implementing Oracle BI Applications during an ERP Upgrade

QA Engagement Models. Managed / Integrated Test Center A Case Study

PM Services. Transition Program Management

Frequently Asked Questions in Project Management

TEN TIPS FOR A SUCCESSFUL INFOR IMPLEMENTATION

Asset Management Plans

Development, Acquisition, Implementation, and Maintenance of Application Systems

Section 6. Governance & Investment Roadmap. Executive Governance

How To Use Cloud Computing For Federal Agencies

What Does the Government Want from Project Management? DC PMI Chapter Executive Breakfast Series January 16, 2008

Enterprise Project and Portfolio Management Implementation Project. Update to the ETS Customer Utility Board Julie Pearson May 27, 2015

Stephen Hess. Jim Livingston. Program Name. IAM Executive Sponsors. Identity & Access Management Program Charter Dated 3 Jun 15

WHITE PAPER Business Value of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Program Summary. Criterion 1: Importance to University Mission / Operations. Importance to Mission

OFFICE OF THE CIO. PROCEDURE Informational VERSION: 1.0

Data Governance Update. BOE workshop January 30, 2014

Project Charter. Secure Message System Upgrade

Aegon's Internal Cloud Broker

Application Outsourcing: The management challenge

Voice Over IP Network Solution Design, Testing, Integration and Implementation Program Overview

TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION

Organizations that are standardizing today are enjoying lower management costs, better uptime. INTRODUCTION

Software Portfolio Analysis Does your Investment perform adequately? Mary Udeh

LEXEVS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENCE SUPPORT PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

The Data Integration Strategy

Program Lifecycle Methodology Version 1.7

2012 National BDPA Technology Conference. Defining Project and PMO Metrics

Why Data Governance - 1 -

SERVICE EXCELLENCE SUITE

Transcription:

Project Name Project Summary Please provide the project charter with this request. Please note any changes to the scope or schedule, or budget in this section and any other information you feel necessary. A project charter template can be provided upon request to UWS. Support of Strategic Direction / Benefits 1. What impact or value will/does the project have on learning, teaching, research and/or administration across UW System? Please include any direct impact on Students. 2. Please describe the project s alignment with the Common System Principles (Appendix 1). 3. Please describe the project s alignment with the Common System Roadmap Objectives (Appendix 1). 4. Is this project considered critical to support other common systems? Does it have any impact on other common systems? If yes to either, please explain. 5. Do all UW System institutions support and plan to use the resulting system? Include the methodology used to assess support/use.

Cost 1. Please provide a high level description of budget expenses (Labor UW Resources, Labor External (i.e. Consultants), Hardware, Software, Other Expenses)provided in this submission If there are Consulting resources included, please explain why they are necessary and also how knowledge transfer will occur to internal staff. 2. Please provide a five year cost estimate for the following two items: 2a. New Project/Enhancement. Include all quantifiable costs, that if approved, the new project/enhancement is estimated to consume and request funding from CSRG for over the next five years. This should include the cost impact that the project/enhancement will have on the operational budget once complete. Please note assumptions made. 2b. Current System (if applicable) Include all quantifiable costs that the current system (system being replaced) is estimated to consume and request funding from CSRG for over the next two years (status quo scenario). Please note any assumptions made. 3. Who have the costs estimates in this proposal been vetted with? Also, have you contacted any other customers of the vendor to help inform the costs in this proposal? 4. Please describe any funding for this project/service being provided outside of this request to CSRG. 5. Please discuss and calculate any efficiencies that are expected to be realized in terms of FTE's, dollars, time, error reduction, risk mitigation, regulatory compliance or other areas not mentioned. Also please provide a best/worst case estimate for when the efficiencies are expected to be realized.

6. How will the project affect staffing at and costs to individual institutions during implementation and operation? If possible, describe effort and estimated costs required by these institution resources to support a successful implementation project and on-going operation. Risk 1. What are the risks associated with not doing this project or reducing its scope? 2. What are the anticipated challenges associated with this project? 3. Are there other institutions who have (or are in the process of) implementing this service? If so, what has their experience been? 4. Are all necessary resources (both Project and Institution) needed to complete the project confirmed and available? If not please explain. 5. Is the target date flexible or drop dead? What is the contingency plan in the event the project misses its target date? 6. Is the project dependent on another project, another solution provider or event? If so, please explain. 7. What is the plan in the event of reduced or no funding being provided?

Stakeholder / Sponsor Questions 1. Who is the project sponsor? 2. Which governance committees have been involved? 3. Please provide governance sign off for this budget proposal submission: Budget Exhibition

Appendix Common System Principles Adhere to a common technical architecture Use industry standards and best business practices for implementation Keep the technical architecture current Leverage current technologies Use a common set of middleware tools, optimized for use by all common systems Ensure integration between major enterprise systems (i.e. HRS, SFS, Budget, Student Systems) through portfolio management Minimize customizations Review and modify business practices to take full advantage of technology before launching an implementation project Customizations will be kept to a minimum to ensure future updates are easier and less expensive Business process change and application of best business practices will be explored before customizations are entertained All customization requests will be submitted to the steering committee Purchase add-ons or develop them internally only after exploring vendor roadmaps and leveraging available mechanisms for product enhancements Eliminate shadow systems that produce the same functionality already in place Address life-cycle Capitalize and depreciate both acquisition and implementation costs Provide adequate staff and financial resources throughout the implementation and ongoing business operation Develop a plan for on-going business operation as part of project implementation plan Regularly upgrade to current versions of vendor-supported software Ensure optimal use of new and existing features to improve processes and eliminate customizations Ensure continuing vendor support Common System Roadmap Objectives To help maintain or improve quality, increase access, and reduce cost per student, technology investments must enable UW System institutions to help accomplish the following: Deliver high quality education to students wherever and whenever they desire it. Improve knowledge management and data driven decision making to better facilitate student access and learning Add measureable value to faculty, staff and students by "cutting red tape," improving service, and enabling all faculty and staff to work more efficiently and effectively. Improve business process to benefit faculty, staff and administrators across all institutions. Reduce the risks inherent in supporting legacy systems with their use of technology that few professional IT workers understand, and that require large investments in programming to keep current through planned replacement and solid change management processes. Safeguard information system and data with best practices in security and privacy.