VETERAN SATISFACTION WITH RN VOICEMAIL GREETING



Similar documents
Research Team 5/22/2012. Disclosure Information. Transitioning New Nurses into Practice: Evaluation of a Year Long Professional Development Program

Factors Influencing Retention of Students in an RN-to-BSN Program

Progress Report Phase I Study of North Carolina Evidence-based Transition to Practice Initiative Project Foundation for Nursing Excellence

Practice Conference Cultivating Nursing Research. W Wisconsin Ave. 14th annual

Presentation Objectives

Tonya Rutherford-Hemming, RN, EdD, ANP-BC University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing

A National Survey on Elements of Nursing Education

Clinical Judgement in Baccalaureate Pre-licensure Nursing Students. Wendy Grochowski Manetti, PhD, CRNP, RN

Building an Evidence-Based Graduate Nursing Program: A Feasibility Study in Tennessee, USA


COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INFORMATICS COMPETENCIES 1. Jeungok Choi, PhD, MPH, RN

How To Teach Nurse Leadership

The Staffing Climate in Nursing: Concept and Measurement

Despite nursing s gains in the process of professionalization, Professional Values: The Case for RN-BSN Completion Education.

The relationship between nurses' perceptions of empowerment and patient satisfaction

Nurse Residency Program 03/27/11 1

Survey of Nursing Education Programs: School Year

The Importance and Impact of Nursing Informatics Competencies for Baccalaureate Nursing Students and Registered Nurses

Barriers & Incentives to Obtaining a Bachelor of Science Degree in Nursing

DECLINING PATIENT SITUATIONS: A Study with New RN Residents

Exploring the Value of Continuing Education Mandates

Calendar. Program Mission and Outcomes. Class Dates. Deadlines for Intent to Graduate Card Fall September 10 Spring

Nurse Caring Behaviors Following Implementation of a Relationship Centered Care Professional Practice Model

Standardize Predictive Testing: Practices, Policies, and NCLEX-RN Outcomes

Learners Perceptions toward the Web-based Distance Learning Activities/Assignments Portion of an Undergraduate Hybrid Instructional Model

The Effect of Flexible Learning Schedule on Online Learners Learning, Application, and Instructional Perception

CHALLENGES IN CARING FOR THE MORBIDLY OBESE: DIFFERENCES BY PRACTICE SETTING

Pamela Rickbeil MSN, RN, APRN-BC, RN-BC Joyce Simones MS, EdD, RN Rachelle Larsen Ph.D., RN

Empowering Nurses to Use Nursing Research to Support Evidence-based Practice Tish Conejo, PhD, RN MidAmerica Nazarene University

1. Overall, how satisfied are you working for The Company? Extremely Dissatisfied. Very Dissatisfied. Somewhat Dissatisfied.

Electronic Standardize Testing for Advanced Practice Registered Nursing (APRN) Programs

Survey of Nurses 2013

Linda Young, RN, MS, FRE, BC Nursing Program Specialist South Dakota Board of Nursing

A Study on Problem Solving Ability of Nursing Students

Despite the Barriers Men Nurses are Safisfied with Career Choices

Survey of Team Attitudes and Relationships (STAR)

Research Article Perspectives from Nurse Managers on Informatics Competencies

Nursing Program Outcomes

Survey of Nursing Education Programs: School Year

How Accelerated Nursing Students Learn

UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTRE PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP ANNUAL REPORT & ACTION PLAN

The Relationship Between RN Job Enjoyment and Intent to Stay: A Unit- Level Analysis. JiSun Choi, PhD, RN, Faculty Advisor

A Master Plan for Nursing Education In Washington State

Nursing Education and Research

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC July 19, 2010

How To Check If A Jordanian Hospital Nurse Is A Good Patient Carer

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

Research Methods & Experimental Design

International Transplant Nurses Society Speaker / Planner Bio Form

ELEANOR MANN SCHOOL OF NURSING: Leeanne Compere Yopp THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN NURSING STAFF KNOWLEDGE OF PERSONHOOD AND RESIDENT COGNITIVE STATUS

EFL LEARNERS PERCEPTIONS OF USING LMS

CONCURRENT ENROLLMENT: A QUICKER PATH TO THE BSN FOR SELECTED ASSOCIATE DEGREE STUDENTS. Inspiring Minds, Transforming Lives, Creating the Future

Evaluation of the LVN Leadership Enhancement and Development Program (LVN LEAD)

Student Learning Contract [SAMPLE] 1. University of Wisconsin Oshkosh: Social Work Department

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS DOCUMENTATION IN NURSING: NURSES PERCEPTIONS, ATTITUDES AND PREFERENCES RESEARCH PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL

Patient Acuity System Redesign: Registered Nurse Satisfaction, Patient Care Requirement and Comparison of Instruments

Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, {Bi-Monthly}, ISSN , Volume-V, Issue-V, Sept-Oct 2015 Issue

COMPARISONS OF CUSTOMER LOYALTY: PUBLIC & PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANIES.

Students Attitude towards Science and Technology

Emerging Challenges for Nursing & Healthcare. Judith Hansen, MS, BSN, RN Executive Director Wisconsin Center for Nursing, Inc.

Customer Service. Level 3 Diploma in Customer Service (QCF) 2014 Skills CFA Level 3 Diploma in Customer Service (QCF) Page 1

The College at Brockport Department of Nursing Application for Consideration for Admission for Fall 2015 Traditional BSN Program

Perception of Shared Governance among Registered Nurses in a Jordanian University Hospital

Impact of ICT on Teacher Engagement in Select Higher Educational Institutions in India

Musicworx Inc California Hospital Volunteer Leadership Conference

State of the South Dakota Nursing Workforce: Data, Trends & Opportunities

JOB SATISFACTION AMONG TEACHERS OF PRIVATE AND GOVERNMENT SCHOOL: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Are We Having Fun Yet?

Optimizing Hospital RN Role Competency Leads to Improved Patient Outcomes

Measuring service quality in city restaurant settings using DINESERV scale

The Implementation of e-procurement System in Health Sector in Greece: Attitudes of Potential Users and Implications for Hospital Management

Cultural Based Interventions For The Prevention of Substance Use/Abuse Among Native American Youth Who Are Pre-Teen/Early Adolescents

12/30/2012. Research Design. Quantitative Research: Types (Campbell & Stanley, 1963; Crowl, 1993)

RUNNING HEAD: Evaluation of nursing student s informatics competency

Role Model Behaviors of Nursing Faculty in Japan and the United States

Transcription:

VETERAN SATISFACTION WITH RN VOICEMAIL GREETING Josephine M. Mancuso, PHD, ANP-BC; Eva Manchester, BSN, RN Lynette Wesley, BSN, RN, CRRN; Barbara Knippel, BSN, RN-BC Gina Hart, BSN, RN-BC; Sandra Radtke, LPN; Vicki Haberman, LPN Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee WI Phone: 414-384-2000 x47212 E-mail: josephine.mancuso@va.gov Background/Significance: Telephone communication is often utilized in primary care to convey information between the RN and the Veteran. The voicemail greeting is usually the first contact and a key element to successful telephone communication. A survey of RN voicemail greetings identified a wide variation in volume, tone, clarity, understanding, information provided, and length of the recording. This may affect Veteran concerns being addressed in a timely manner and RN productivity. Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine veteran satisfaction with the RN voicemail greeting and to identify if voicemail messages for RNs decreased after implementation of a standardized voicemail greeting. Framework: Iowa Model of Evidence Based-Practice to Promote Quality Care. Sample/Setting: A volunteer, convenience sample of 502 Veterans and 4 RNs from 3 primary care clinics. Method/Design/Procedure: Utilizing a pre-test/post-test design, the study took place in 3 phases, each 3 months long. Phase 1 consisted of the original voicemail greeting. Phase 2 consisted of implementation of a standardized voicemail greeting. Phase 3 consisted of continuance of the standardized voicemail greeting. Veterans completed the Voicemail Greeting Satisfaction Questionnaire (α =.92, scores from 0 12, 12 = highest score) and RNs recorded the number and type of voicemail messages during phases 1 and 3. T- test analyses were performed. Results: Final sample size consisted of 367 predominately male (97.5%) veterans with a mean age of 61 and a mean of 11 years at the VA who listened to the RN voicemail greeting a mean of 2 times over a 30 day period. An independent t-test showed that the difference between voicemail greetings was significant (p< 0.0005). Veterans were more satisfied (M=11.62) with the standardized voicemail greeting than the original voicemail greeting (M=6.98). A paired t-test showed that the difference between RN voicemail messages was significant (p = 0.014). RN voicemail messages decreased from phase 1 (M=643) to phase 3 (M=457). Conclusions/implications: Telephone encounters have a direct impact on perception of VA service and RN productivity. Utilization of a standardized voicemail greeting may improve the quality of care provided to veterans by streamlining needed information via telephone communication.

Introduction Veteran Satisfaction with RN Voicemail Greeting Eva Manchester, BSN, RN Lynette Wesley, BSN, CRRN Disclosure Information: Learners must fill out and turn in evaluations to successfully complete this program. There are no relevant financial relationships related to this presentation. There is no sponsorship/commercial support of this presentation. There is no off-label drug use described in this presentation. The content being presented will be fair, well-balanced and evidence-based. Voicemail communication is one of the methods utilized in primary care to convey information between the RN and the Veteran. The voicemail greeting: is usually the first encounter with voicemail temporarily replaces the nurse validates who the nurse is and their role may provide instruction may direct the caller/patient to another area Background/Significance American Nurses Association Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice Survey primary care RNs voicemail greeting Content information given Speech Pattern tone, voice, and speed Length Results More differences than similarities Purpose To determine the impact on Veteran satisfaction and the number of RN voicemail messages using a standardized voicemail greeting. Research Question: Does Veteran satisfaction and the number of RN voicemail messages change with a standardized voicemail greeting compared to an individualized voicemail greeting? Framework Research Design Problem Focused Trigger: Telephone Communication Organizational Priority? Yes Form a Team Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care Nonequivalent group pretest-posttest 3 Phases Veteran Satisfaction RN voicemail Messages Primary Care Practice Research Council Assemble, Critique, and Synthesize Relevant Research Minimal Sufficient Research Base? No Conduct Research: Veteran Satisfaction with RN Voicemail Greeting 1

Procedure Intervention Three Phases 1. Original voicemail greeting / data collection 2. Implementation of standardized voicemail greeting 3. Continuance of standardized voicemail greeting / data collection Veterans completed the Veteran Satisfaction Voicemail Questionnaire and RNs recorded the number and type of voicemail messages during phases 1 and 3. Instruments Voicemail Greeting Satisfaction Questionnaire Scores range from 0 12 12 = highest score Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level 4.2 α = 0.92 Content / Face Validity RN Voicemail Message Record Sample/Setting Volunteer, convenience sample Primary care clinic Veterans Power Analysis Calculated sample 368 (184 per group) Medium effect size Alpha set at 0.05 Power of 80% Total sample size N = 502 Usable Questionnaires N = 367 181 / 186 4 Primary care clinic RNs Data Analysis Independent T-Test Voicemail Greeting Satisfaction Questionnaire Dependent T-Test RN Voicemail Messages Statistical Significance Set at p < 0.05 Ethical Considerations Institutional Review Board VA Medical Center Return of the questionnaire represented willingness to participate Confidentiality 2

Results Results Veteran Characteristics Standardized Voicemail Greeting M(SD) M(SD) p = Age a 59.8(14.7) 62.4(13.7) 0.081 Years at VA a 10.4(11.1) 11.8(11.3) 0.250 No. Times Listened to VM Greeting in past 30 days a 2.2( 2.0) 2.1( 2.2) 0.665 n(%) n(%) Gender b a Independent T-Test b Chi-Square VM = Voicemail Male Female 169(93.4) 8( 4.4) 183(98.4) 1( 0.5) 0.015* *Significance p < 0.05 Score Veteran Satisfaction Questionnaire* Standardized Voicemail Greeting n M SD Sig. p<0.05 181 186 6.98 11.26 4.42 1.91 p<0.0005 An independent t-test indicated that Veterans were significantly more satisfied with the standardized voicemail greeting than the original voicemail greeting. t (365) = 12.07, p < 0.0005. d = 1.26 *Correlation: Older veterans were less satisfied with the voicemail greeting overall (r = - 0.147; p < 0.01) Results Recommendations Voicemail Messages RN Voicemail Messages Standardized Voicemail Greeting Total M SD Sig. p<0.05 2573 1826 643.25 456.50 149.94 186.75 p=0.014 A dependent t-test indicated that the number of RN voicemail messages was significantly lower after implementation of the standardized voicemail greeting than with the original voicemail greeting. t (3) = 5.23, p = 0.14, d = 1.11 Change primary care voicemail greetings to a standardized one. Increases Veteran satisfaction Provides important needed information Decrease in voicemail messages / RN time saved Length approximately one minute Return all messages in a 24 hour period Remove feature that allows one to opt out Attention to functionality, tone, volume, speed, clarity and word choice Future Research Identify the number and type of phone encounters received Implement a pilot of a standardized voicemail greeting that meets patient demand Review the results Determine if the aging population has specific needs in terms of telephone contact Conclusion Improved quality of care Direct impact on perception of VA service Decreased RN workload Streamlined telephone communication 3

Limitations Convenience sample Selection bias Generalizability Causation Confounding variables Primary Care Practice Research Council Josephine M. Mancuso, PhD, ANP-BC Eva Manchester, BSN, RN Lynette Wesley, BSN, CRRN Barbara Knippel, BSN, RN-BC Gina Hart, BSN, RN-BC Sandra Radtke, LPN Vicki Haberman, LPN Accepted for Publication Questions 4