EDWARDSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7 CERTIFIED EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PLAN



Similar documents
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,

MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS

I. THE PLAN. Init.10/10

Participant Guidebook

Teacher Evaluation Plan and Handbook Of Procedures. Mr. Arne Duncan Chief Executive Officer Chicago Public Schools

CHAPTER 26. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

PERA Overview for School Board Members

Teacher Performance Appraisal. Frequently Asked Questions. Table of Contents. Classroom Observation & Pre- and Post-Observation Meetings 9

School District Appraisal Systems in Texas

Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

Mercer County Informal Observation Checklist School Nurse

Jolie Wineroth, Executive Director Human Resources

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)

Norfolk Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System

N.J.A.C. 6A:10, EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL

Model for Instructional Improvement. Teacher Evaluation

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

PERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL

Performance-Based Evaluation Handbook

Teacher Performance Evaluation System

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR

Internship Guide. M.Ed. in Special Education

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

Chapter 8a Public Education Human Resource Management Act. Part 1 General Provisions

DATE ISSUED: 10/29/ of 8 UPDATE 98 DNA(LEGAL)-P

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, TABLE OF CONTENTS

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION HANDBOOK FOR TEACHERS

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

TEACHNJ ACT. New Evaluation Implementation School Year Required by State of NJ

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

CITY OF ST. CHARLES SCHOOL DISTRICT PERFORMANCE-BASED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION

PreK 12 Practicum and Internship. School Counseling. Overview

Board of Cooperative Educational Services Rensselaer-Columbia-Greene Counties Annual Professional Performance Review

Hamilton-Fulton-Montgomery BOCES Annual Professional Performance Review

Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

PART 425 VOLUNTARY REGISTRATION AND RECOGNITION OF NONPUBLIC SCHOOLS

Request for Proposals. for. Special Education Teacher Services for the School Year. Special Conditions and Specifications RFP

TABLE OF CONTENTS C. SUMMATIVE EVALUATION REPORT (FORM C) D. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN - YEARS 2, 3, 4 (FORM D) 16-17

The Impact of State and Local Human Capital Policies on Illinois School District U-46. September 2009

Illinois State Board of Education Division of Funding and Disbursement Services. Driver Education Frequently Asked Questions Updated October, 2011

SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Cooperating Teacher Manual Fall 2014-Spring California University of Pennsylvania

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR ADMINISTRATION

St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

Supervised Student Teaching Experience for All Education Majors

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

DRAFT POLICY ON CONFIRMATION, EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF PROBATIONARY APPOINTMENT OF CS EDUCATORS-KZN: DEC

Illinois State University. Handbook for Student Teaching

North Dakota PROGRAM REVIEW FOR SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS

Radford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

The word "supervisor," as used in this document, shall mean anyone who is in a rating capacity.

Division of Human Resources Staff Performance Management Procedure

CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN

COLLEGE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES School of Nursing. Guidelines for Promotion, Tenure and Reappointment (Effective May, 2007)

SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL NURSE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

EDUCATOR LICENSURE CHAPTER RULES OF THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION CHAPTER EDUCATOR LICENSURE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Teacher Performance Evaluation System

DPAS II Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators. DPAS II Guide Revised for Specialists

AMPHITHEATER SCHOOL COUNSELOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM. Amphitheater Public Schools 701 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 85705

Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Teacher Performance Appraisal

Special Education Teacher

EVALUATION - SUPPORT STAFF

PROGRAM DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION - STRUCTURED LEARNING CLASS PROGRAM

TITLE 34. LABOR AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CHAPTER 19. CONSCIENTIOUS EMPLOYEE PROTECTION ACT. N.J. Stat. 34:19-1 (2007)

Molloy College Rockville Centre, New York COURSE OUTLINE. EDU 490 Visual Arts Education - Student Teaching

Kean University College of Education Field Experiences

CSEk 1811 ~ Civil Service Law SECTION 75. A Basic Primer. 143 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York Danny Donohue, President

JOB DESCRIPTION PATERSON BOARD OF EDUCATION. SUPERVISORS - EDUCATIONAL 1749 Supervisor of Great Falls Academy Page 1 of 6 REVISED

TIP Plans and Success in the Field

Fact Sheet UPDATED January 2016

Guidance Counselor -Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

St. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents

Settlement Agreement. Between. The United States. And. The Clay County School District

The Board of Zoning Appeals shall have the duty and power to:

inchester Public Schools

6. Additional Requirements - Teachers Created Tuesday, April 30, 2013 Updated Thursday, September 26, 2013

Prepared by: Kate Tarrant Prepared February 3, 2015

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum, Instruction and Technology

Quality Handbook. Part D: Regulations. Section 16E: Professional Doctorate Degrees. Section16E. Nottingham Trent University

ILLINOIS DUE PROCESS HEARING OFFICER - Performance Evaluation Matrix PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 1

EPPING SCHOOL DISTRICT JOB DESCRIPTION

Arkansas Department of Education Rules Governing Professional Development July 2005

Department of Secondary Education Student Teaching Handbook

Position Description

Calendar DEGREES AWARDED IN CONJUNCTION WITH EDINBURGH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY EMERGENCY STORAGE PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT. Appendix B

Performance Appraisal- Certified Staff

Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES

Calendar DEGREES AWARDED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FREE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND COLLEGE

Department of Social Work. Departmental Guidelines for Tenure, Promotion and Post- Tenure Review for AY

OKLAHOMA. Downloaded January (d) Administrative records of the facility shall include the following information:

Transcription:

EDWARDSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7 CERTIFIED EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PLAN Developed 2012 Page 1 of 11

EVALUATION PROCESS AND SCHEDULE FOR TEACHERS AND CERTIFICATED SCHOOL SERVICE PERSONNEL Evaluation in School District #7 is a formal process to determine the quality if an employee s work performance and to relate that performance to the goals and objectives of the school system. Employees and supervisors are informed in advance of the administrative rules and collective bargaining agreements are strictly followed. In School District #7, the evaluation emphasis is to stimulate professional performance growth and to provide a rational basis for personnel decisions. The building administrator will inform the teachers and certificated school service personnel under his/her supervision of the district evaluation plan within two weeks of the beginning of the school year. Prior to each written evaluation, a formal observation of significant duration will be conducted by the administrator to assess the performance of the employee, including such areas as classroom management, instructional methodology, and competency in subject matter(s) taught or service provided. Attendance, instructional planning, and other areas specified in the employee s job description and on the evaluation instrument will be evaluated. As part of the overall evaluation process, a conference allowing for clear communication between the evaluator and the person being evaluated is conducted. Only a qualified administrator will evaluate certified employees. A qualified administrator is defined under the Illinois School Code as a professional teacher who is required to hold a supervisory or administrative certificate in accordance with Article 21 of the School Code, and is qualified to evaluate certified personnel in accordance with the Illinois School Code. Page 2 of 11

SCHEDULE OF EVALUATIONS The total evaluation process as described in Article VI, Section C of the contract must be completed, and the signed summative evaluation form turned in to the central office on or before February 15. A. Non-Tenured Teachers: Non-tenured teachers shall receive one summative evaluation on or before February 15 each school year. The summative evaluation will be based on at least one formal and one informal observation during the Fall semester and at least one formal and one informal observation during the Spring semester. The evaluator, in his/her discretion, may conduct more than the minimum number of formal and informal observations. B. Tenured Teachers: Tenured teachers shall receive one summative evaluation at least once every other school year on or before February 15. The summative evaluation will be based on at least one formal and one informal observation during the Fall semester and at least one formal and one informal observation during the Spring semester. The evaluator, in his/her discretion, may conduct more than the minimum number of formal and informal observations. Tenured teachers may be evaluated more often than once every two years if deemed necessary within the administration s discretion. Tenured teachers who received an overall summative evaluation rating of Needs Improvement on their last evaluation shall be formally evaluated and issued a summative evaluation the following school year. Tenured teachers who received an overall summative evaluation rating of Unsatisfactory and successfully completed the 90 school day remediation plan with at least a Proficient rating shall be formally evaluated and issued a summative evaluation the following school year. Page 3 of 11

PROCEDURES FOR FORMAL AND INFORMAL OBSERVATIONS AND SUMMATIVE EVALUATIONS A. Informal Observations: Informal observations shall include unannounced visits to a certified employee s classroom. The administrator may provide verbal or written feedback to the certified employee. B. Formal Observations: 1. Formal observations will last a minimum of 45 minutes or one lesson or one class period. 2. The evaluator will conduct a pre-observation meeting with the certified employee to confirm the date of the classroom observation; review and discuss the lesson plan and what is expected to be observed during the observation. 3. The evaluator will schedule a post-observation meeting with the certified employee within 15 calendar days of the observation. At this meeting, the evaluator will provide verbal and written feedback to the certified employee. C. Summative Evaluation: 1. The evaluator will schedule a meeting and provide the certified employee a summative evaluation no later than 15 calendar days after the date of the last formal observation, unless prevented by unusual circumstances. The summative evaluation will be based on informal and formal observations and other information bearing on the certified employee s performance. 2. The evaluator and employee will review and discuss the summative evaluation and sign the document. The employee will be given a copy of the summative evaluation. 3. If the employee feels his/her summative evaluation is incomplete, inaccurate or unjust, he/she may put his/her objections in writing and have them attached to the summative evaluation and placed in his/her personnel file. The evaluator may attach a written response to the employee s objections. Page 4 of 11

RATING SCALE FOR TEACHERS AND CETIFIED SCHOOL SRERVICE PERSONNEL Excellent: Documented formal and informal observations reveal performance of consistently exceptional quality. Clearly identified strengths are in all areas measured by the evaluation instrument. Proficient: Documented formal and informal observations reveal performance of consistently commendable quality. Strengths are identified in most of the areas measured by the valuation instrument. Any identification deficiencies are minor in nature and may be quickly improved. Needs Improvement: Documented formal and informal observations reveal some deficiencies in a specific area or areas of the evaluation standards and instrument. One or more areas measured by the evaluation instrument are not consistently met and need improvement. Identified deficiencies for tenured teachers are identified in a Professional Development Plan. Unsatisfactory: Documented formal and informal observations reveal significant deficiencies in a specific area or areas of the evaluation standards and instrument. These deficiencies are of such a degree as to require the direct intervention of an administrator and the formally identified remedial plan as per Illinois School Code. Page 5 of 11

STANDARDS/EXPECTATIONS FOR TEACHERS Each teacher must demonstrate maintenance of an appropriate learning atmosphere which provides for a measurable level of instructional effectiveness. Teachers will communicate expectations and provide appropriate learning tasks presented in a variety of methods. Teachers will appraise student performance and provide feed-back, reinforcement, and appropriate correctional instruction. Each teacher must exhibit and demonstrate appropriate organization and management skills. These skills shall include: Careful lesson planning, organization of routines and materials so students spend a high level of time-on-task and maintenance of student behavior by enforcing district rules and regulations with open communication between students and teacher. Each teacher must maintain interaction with students and parents in a positive and caring manner which encourages learning. In all areas, the teacher is expected to maintain the highest level of personal integrity. Each teacher must conduct himself/herself in a manner which reflects a high level of professional demeanor. This includes maintaining accurate and helpful communication with students, parents and colleagues. It also includes adhering to the approved policies, procedures and the curriculum of the district and taking the necessary steps for self-improvement. Page 6 of 11

STANDARDS/EXPECTATIONS FOR CERTIFICATED SCHOOL SERVICE PERSONNEL Each service employee must effectively deliver his/her particular support service to individual students. A setting and the communication conducive to success must be maintained. Knowledge of and the use of techniques and methods to work with individual students well are essential. Students must receive input to affect their programs positively, regular feedback regarding themselves and their situation, and appropriate reinforcement. Each certified school service employee must serve the students in an organized, well-managed manner. This includes careful planning and the good organization of routines and materials necessary to effectively carry out the responsibilities required. Each certificated school service employee must maintain interaction with students and parents in a positive and caring manner. In all areas, the employee is expected to maintain the highest level of personal integrity. The employee must also demonstrate a high level of professional behavior. Professional responsibilities must be carried out thoroughly and accurately. Positive interaction with colleagues and parents must be maintained as necessary. District policies and procedures must be followed, and professional self-growth as necessary is expected. Page 7 of 11

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN In accordance with the Illinois School Code, 105 ILCS 5/24A-5, et seq., the following procedures will be followed when a tenured certified employee receives a needs improvement performance rating: Within 30 school days after the completion of an evaluation rating, the evaluator will prepare a professional development plan in consultation with the teacher and taking into account the teacher's on-going professional responsibilities including his or her regular teaching assignments. The Professional Development plan will identify each area that needs improvement and any supports that the district will provide to address the areas identified as needing improvement. Page 8 of 11

REMEDIATION In accordance with the Illinois School Code, 105 ILCS 5/24A-5, et seq., the following procedures will be followed when a tenured certified employee receives an unsatisfactory performance rating: 1. Within 30 school days after the completion of an evaluation, the administrator qualified under Section 24A-3 [105 ILCS 5/24A-3], will prepare a remediation plan designed to correct deficiencies cited, provided the deficiencies are deemed remediable. The remediation plan for unsatisfactory, tenured employees shall provide for 90 school days of remediation within the classroom, if applicable. The final evaluation issued pursuant to this Section shall be issued within 10 days after the conclusion of the respective remediation plan. However, the school board shall not lose jurisdiction to discharge an employee in the event the evaluation is not issued within 10 days after the conclusion of the respective remediation plan. 2. Participants in the remediation plan will include: the employee rated "unsatisfactory", a district administrator qualified under Section 24A-3 [105 ILCS 5/24A-3] a consulting certified employee who: a. is selected by the participating administrator or by the principal of the employee who was rated "unsatisfactory", b. is an educational employee as defined in the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Act [115 ILCS 5/1 et seq.], c. has at least 5 years' certified experience d. has a reasonable familiarity with the assignment of the employee being evaluated, e. has received an "excellent" rating on his or her most recent evaluation. If there is no employee available within the district who meets these criteria, the district shall request and the State Board of Education shall supply person who meets these criteria. 3. The Association may, if it so chooses, supply a roster of qualified certified employees from whom the consulting employee is to be selected. That roster shall, however, contain the names of at least 5 certified employees, each of whom meets the criteria for consulting employee with regard to the employee being evaluated, or the names of all certified employees so qualified if that number is less than 5. In the event of a dispute as to qualification, the State Board shall determine qualification. 4. The employee under remediation shall be evaluated and issued a rating at least mid-point and at the end of the 90 school day remediation period. These evaluations shall be conducted by the participating administrator. The consulting employee shall provide advice to the employee rated "unsatisfactory" on how to improve teaching skills and to successfully complete the remediation plan. The consulting employee shall participate in developing the Page 9 of 11

remediation plan, but the final decision as to the evaluation shall be done solely by the administrator, unless an applicable collective bargaining agreement provides to the contrary. Evaluations at the conclusion of the remediation process shall be separate and distinct from the required annual evaluations of employees and shall not be subject to the guidelines and procedures relating to those annual evaluations. The evaluator may but is not required to use the forms provided for the annual evaluation of employees in the district's evaluation plan. 5. The employee under remediation will be formally evaluated the following year he/she completes the 90 school day remediation plan with a proficient or better rating. 6. The employee under remediation shall be dismissed in accordance with Section 24-12 of The Illinois School Code [105 ILCS 5/24-12] if the employee fails to complete any applicable remediation plan with a proficient or better rating. Districts and employees subject to dismissal hearings are precluded from compelling the testimony of consulting employees at such hearings under Section 24-12 [105 ILCS 5/24-12], either as to the rating process or for opinions of performances by employees under remediation. 7. Nothing in these procedures shall be construed as preventing immediate dismissal of an employee for deficiencies which are deemed irremediable or for actions which are injurious to or endanger the health or person of students in the classroom or school. Failure to strictly comply with the time requirements contained in Section 24A-5 [105 ILCS 5/24A-5] shall not invalidate the results of the remediation plan. Page 10 of 11

EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4: Certified Teacher s Summative Evaluation Report Certified School Service Personnel Evaluation Report Post-Observation Form (sample) Certified Teacher and School Service Personnel Job Descriptions Page 11 of 11