U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re ABB Power T&D Company Inc. Serial No.



Similar documents
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re International Data Group, Inc. Serial No.

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE T.T.A.B. Paper No. 9 EJS UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Charmay, Inc. d.b.a. ServiceMaster of Alexandria

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re SeaChange Technology, Inc. Serial No.

2/28/01 THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE T.T.A.B. Paper No. 13 HWR UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Ex parte appeal Applicant s mark: PREFERRED ASSET MANAGEMENT for financial advisory services. Mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1)

Paper No. 9 ejs THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB JUNE 29, 99 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

What Does the Term WORLDWIDE MARINE Mean?

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Lucent Technologies Inc. Serial No.

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE T.T.A.B. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

THIS DISPOSITION OF THE T.T.A.B. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Zarak Systems Corporation

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Orbital Sciences Corp. Serial No.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re The Biltmore Company a/k/a Biltmore Estate. Serial No.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Premier Products, Inc. Serial No. 75/488,001

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

the mark on November 15, 1994, and use in interstate The Examining Attorney refused registration under

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Paper No. 11 BAC THIS DISPOSITION IS CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB DEC. 11, 98 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB. Mailed: January 3, 2005 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Teloquent Communications Corporation

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE T.T.A.B. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT RLS/LG OF THE T.T.A.B. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Hearing: Paper No. 29 April 8, 1997 EWH/TF. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Bell & Howell Document Management Products Company

THIS DISPOSITION IS CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB. Mailed: August 12, 2004 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB APRIL 11, 00 Paper No. 14 HRW U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re AUSA Financial Markets, Inc. Serial No.

This Opinion is Not Citable as Precedent of the TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Mosaicorp, Inc. Serial No

confusion or mistake or to deceive. The Examining Attorney Both applicant and the Examining Attorney have filed

Mailed: 22 June 2006 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Liberty Bankers Life Insurance Company

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. James P. Cecil, Inc. v. Enterprise Automation, Inc.

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB

In re Wright Medical Technology, Inc.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re ExpoSystems, Inc. Serial No.

TICKETS and Ticketing - A Review

Paper No. 9 PTH THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB OCT 23, 98 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. In re Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, T/A Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.

Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Station: Progress Status Based on the Recovery Plan (As of the End of April 2013)

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB NOV. 6, 97 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

The Intelligent AX1 Switchgear for Medium Voltage

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE OFFICE ACTION

DD IP Holder LLC U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO BAGEL BUNCHKIN - D /17/2012 7:22:27 PM

To: The Executors of the Franklin E. Kameny ETC. ( ABTrademarkApp@gmail.com) Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO GAY IS GOOD - N/A

Emirates Aluminium starts up World s first fully integrated power distribution system from ABB

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

This Opinion is Citable as Precedent of the TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Hurvitz, Philip Michael U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO PHILTHY SANCHEZ - N/A 1/24/2011 2:22:07 PM

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

The following components are common to most cubicles; this example is an ABB HK cubicle.

Eyeo GmbH Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO ADBLOCK PLUS /6/ :50:03 AM

EXAMINATION GUIDE NO. 2-99

Nuclear Power Plant Electrical Power Supply System Requirements

..OR How To Protect your 3-Phase Equipment Investment with 3-Phase Monitors from Time Mark...

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

Siemens tiastar TM Motor Control Center (MCC) Siemens All rights reserved.

TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO SEATTLE COFFEE COMPANY - N/A UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE OFFICE ACTION

Remote Monitoring and REC 501 Control Unit Product Guide

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 09/982,337 10/18/2001 Todd Ouzts MFCP.

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB. September 15, 2004 October 22, 2004 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO) OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT S TRADEMARK APPLICATION OFFICE ACTION

Harvey W. Wiley U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO COCA COLA - N/A 5/31/2013 8:25:08 AM

Product Description Full Voltage Starting Electric Fire Pump Controllers FTA1000

Power-Zone 4 Arc Resistant Low Voltage Switchgear

llllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Product overview brochure. ABB Medium Voltage Products Our one-stop approach for every medium voltage application

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Response USA, Inc. v. Recall Services, Inc.

Introduction To SCADA and Telemetry

To: Subject: Sent: Sent As:

DF-DT (G) MEDIUM VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR THE MODULAR CONCEPT. User Manual. SGC - SwitchGear Company nv - Moorstraat 24 - B-9850 Nevele - Belgium

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB MARCH 9, 99 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

This Opinion Is a Precedent of the TTAB. In re Christopher C. Hinton

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB. Mailed: August 21, 2003 Paper No. 12 BAC UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Google Inc. le.com) U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO GLASS - N/A 9/18/ :45:47 AM

Power Plant Electrical Distribution Systems

Design of electrical power system for a 1000MW nuclear power generating station

Power Quality For The Digital Age INVERTING SOLAR POWER A N E N V IRONME N TA L P OT E N T I A L S W HI T E PA PER

Generic PCSR Sub-chapter 15.4 : Electrical Equipment

Electrical Fitter. A competent Electrical Fitter is expected to:

INSTRUCTIONS FOR BUILDINGS WITH FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT

INTERNATIONAL POWER DISTRIBUTION CONGRESS CIDEL ARGENTINA 2002

Safe and secure distribution of medium voltage with AX1

HYDRO-ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS

Bypass transfer switch mechanisms

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Low Voltage Switchgear MNS is with MSpeed

Fusible Disconnect Switch

Transcription:

THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB JAN 13, 98 Paper No. 10 RLS/KRD U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Trademark Trial and Appeal Board In re ABB Power T&D Company Inc. Serial No. 74/678,832 Anthony J. Rossi of Woodcock Washburn Kurtz Mackiewicz & Norris for ABB Power T&D Company Inc. Cora Moorhead, Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 102 (Myra Kurzbard, Managing Attorney). Before Simms, Seeherman and Hairston, Administrative Trademark Judges. Opinion by Simms, Administrative Trademark Judge: ABB Power T&D Company Inc. (applicant) has appealed from the final refusal of the Trademark Examining Attorney to register the mark SAFEGEAR for electrical switchgear. 1 The Examining Attorney has refused registration under Section 2(e)(1) of the Act, 15 USC 1052(e)(1), on the ground that applicant s asserted mark is merely descriptive of its 1 Application Serial No. 74/678,832, filed May 22, 1995, based upon applicant s claim of use of the mark in commerce since April 1994.

goods. 2 Applicant and the Examining Attorney have submitted briefs but no oral hearing was requested. We reverse. The Examining Attorney, referring to applicant s product literature noting that applicant s electrical switchgear lowers costs and improves safety by controlling the effects of an arc fault, argues that the mark SAFEGEAR attributes a safety quality to applicant s goods and that applicant s product literature indicates that applicant s product is safer than conventional switchgear. It is quite plausible that purchasers would perceive safegear as lauding quality and excellence to [sic] the electrical switchgear. Examining Attorney s appeal brief, 5. The Examining Attorney refers to dictionary definitions of the words safe ( Affording protection ) and gear ( A complete assembly that performs a specific function in a larger machine ). The Examining Attorney has also relied upon excerpts from articles obtained from the LEXIS/NEXIS computer search systems wherein the word safe appeared within twenty words of the word switchgear. Some of these excerpts are quoted below. 2 It is noted that the Examining Attorney in her brief, in the final refusal and in other papers has stated that applicant s mark is primarily merely descriptive. The Examining Attorney is reminded that Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act bars 2

The control and protection equipment for each pair of feeders is installed in a small local kiosk. Safe switchgear operation is provided by the digital interlocking system 8TK. Modern Power Systems, June 1993 * * * * * * * Key interlocks and other tamper-proof systems prevent the accidental closing or opening of switches and switchgear out of sequence when used per system operating instructions. As with any other fail-safe systems, there are ways to override the intended use, which is to prevent the operation of the electrical system in the wrong sequence. EC&M Electrical Construction & Maintenance, March 1995 * * * * * * * GIS switching station on the UCLA campus is the first fully SF[6] gasinsulated 38-kV switchgear in utility service in the United States. It provides safe, reliable service in a very limited space. Electric Light & Power, August 1994 * * * * * * * While this provides a quick and safe method of sensing the, [sic] travelling wave it is not as convenient as sensing current as the point of pick-up of the signal will now be in a switchgear compound rather than in a relay room. Modern Power Systems, March 1994 I wondered what had happened, and then I thought of two of my people who were working in the switchgear room in the registration of a mark which, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant is merely descriptive 3

basement. Maybe something had shorted out. Immediately he started calling on his two-way radio, fortunately, everybody was safe and accounted for Heating, Piping, Air-Conditioning, February 1994 leaves plenty of room for RTU and communications interface in same enclosure; Figure 6. Existing loadbreak switchgear in downtown vault is retrofitted with actuators, RTUs, and communications interface; Figure 7. Remote switch operator for safe manual operation of oil-filled switches is additional benefit of actuator retrofit Electrical World, May 1993 cause or threaten the most serious disruption usually involve electrical equipment that is never supposed to fail: transformers, bus ducts, switchgear, etc. The serious mistake is to assume that the data processing installation is safe because a lot of money was spent on power conditioning systems and standby generators EC&M Electrical Construction & Maintenance, May 1992 serves to switch the auxiliaries to the start up grid when disturbances in the power supply occur, during normal operation, so that safe shut down of the complete plant is achieved. The auxiliaries switchgear feeds the voltage levels of 6 kv and 380 V ac and [sic] well as 222 V and 24 V dc. Modern Power Systems, September 1990 4

The facility is designed for the repair of radiologically contaminated electrical and mechanical apparatus, including motors, generators, switchgear, and pumps. The center provides safe, high-quality, and quick turnaround repairs of contaminated equipment on a 24-hour, 7-day-a-week Nuclear News, October 1988 Although some of these excerpts reveal use of the word safe in connection with the operation of switchgear, it should be noted that in many of the references the term safe modifies or describes other equipment. 3 Applicant argues that, at most, the term SAFEGEAR is suggestive of an aspect or characteristic of its goods and that some imagination and perception is required to determine the nature of its goods. Noting that its goods include both housing and electrical components within the 3 In other excerpts, the adjective safe is used to describe communication and conveyor control equipment and electrical power: One of the major supliers [sic} of flame-proof switchgear and intrinsically safe communication and conveyor control equipment is and Four-color brochure on sealed lead-acid batteries that provide clean, safe standby power for office environments. The sealed batteries are spillproof, maintenance-free and provide backup power for computers, PBXs, cellular telephones, switchgear and control devices 5

housing, applicant s attorney argues that the mark SAFEGEAR is not descriptive of any particular type of switchgear. Applicant s unique arc-resistant construction for its switchgear controls the effects of an internal arc fault, which could be catastrophic due to the high pressures and hot gasses generated upon the occurrence of an internal arc fault in the switchgear. Applicant s unique construction for its switchgear channels such high pressures and hot gasses safely away from personnel. Applicant s appeal brief, 5. It is applicant s position that the Examining Attorney has submitted no articles showing the descriptive use of the term SAFEGEAR or use of the term safe to describe a characteristic of switchgear. In some articles, applicant maintains, the term safe is used to describe the maintenance of equipment and, in most, the term is used to modify a noun other than switchgear. Applicant also notes that the Examining Attorney has submitted no evidence of third-party use of this term, and argues that manufacturers of electrical switchgear are free to inform the purchasing public that their electrical switchgear is safe by indicating that they make safe electrical switchgear. At most, the evidence shows that the combination of words conveys that gear of some type is safe, not that switchgear is safe, applicant argues. 6

Whether a term is merely descriptive is not determined in the abstract, but in relation to the goods for which registration is sought, the context in which it is used and the possible significance that the mark would have to the average purchaser because of the manner of use. In re Bright-Crest, Ltd., 204 USPQ 591 (TTAB 1979). Of course, there is often a thin line of separation between a suggestive term and a merely descriptive term, and the determination of which category a mark falls into may be somewhat subjective. Upon careful consideration of this record, we agree with applicant that the mark SAFEGEAR is, at most, suggestive of applicant s electrical switchgear. While the term safe is undoubtedly a term that one could use to describe an aspect of some electrical switchgear, there is simply no evidence in this record that electrical switchgear or switchgear is ever referred to by the shortened word gear. Compare Remington Products Inc. v. North American Philips Corp., 892 F.2d 1576, 13 USPQ2d 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1990)(TRAVEL CARE held merely descriptive for certain personal care products for travelers). If this were the case, then an argument could be made that applicant s mark might be merely descriptive of such safe gear. However, in the absence of such evidence and because we believe that 7

some, although perhaps not much, imagination or reasoning is required, we hold that the mark SAFEGEAR is not merely descriptive of applicant s electrical switchgear. Decision: The refusal of registration is reversed. R. L. Simms E. J. Seeherman P. T. Hairston Administrative Trademark Judges, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board 8