What Gets Lost in the IP Transition?



Similar documents
The IP Interconnection Debate: What is it and Why is it So Important?

TAC Memo VoIP Interconnection. September 24, 2012

Telecommunications Competition: Where is it and Where is it Going? DAVID BREVITZ, C.F.A. 36 TH ANNUAL PURC CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 5, 2009

PSTN Transition to IP

FCC Review of Verizon s Section 214 Application and Its Implications for the IP Transition. NASUCA Annual Meeting

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA SENATE CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE AND COMMUNICATIONS AND HIGH TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEES

January 10, Ex Parte. Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission th Street SW Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

Telecommunications Deregulation: Updating the Scorecard for 2013

Facts and Consequences

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

Analysis and Recommendations Regarding the Regulation of FairPoint Communications, LLC Report Required By Act 53 of the Legislative Session

Comments of Verizon Business. Regarding the Public Consultation Paper:

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

State Telecom Legislation: Broken Promises

Review Of The Commission Workplace (O1) And Its Role In SIP Interconnection Services

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

List of Figures Analysis Executive Summary 1. International Call Volumes and Growth Rates, Compounded Annual Traffic Growth Rate by

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

Office of Emergency Communications Next Generation Network Priority Services

The Effectiveness of Mobile Wireless Service as a Competitive Constraint on Landline Pricing: Was the DOJ Wrong?

How Does Universal Service 911 Inter-Carrier Compensation Affect You?

Pennsylvania State Senate Communications & Technology Committee Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Can the PSTN be Shut Down?

Competition in the Telecommunications Industry

The IP Transition to 21 st Century Services

BY: John B. Horrigan, Ph.D., Senior Research Specialist, ( )

Report to the 82 nd Texas Legislature

Addendum StartPage: 0

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C GN Docket No PS Docket No WC Docket No.

Bill No proposes to eliminate oversight of VoIP in Connecticut.

KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report

THE INDUSTRY How have technological changes affected the telecommunications industry, including entities that want to make automated calls?

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF COMCAST CORPORATION

The IP Transition Copper Retirement - Service Discontinuance Residential Backup Power FCC Privacy Authority

BEFORE THE GUAM PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) BACKGROUND

VERIZON HOME PHONE ANSWERING SERVICE

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Core-Edge Working Group Meeting, September 28-29, 2004 Chintan Vaishnav Research Assistant, MIT CFP

Gigabit Broadband Access: Status, Forecasts and Observations

Company Responses to CWA Questions Regarding DirecTV Acquisition

evolving voic An Advanced VoIP Migration Strategy for CLECs, ILECs Mpathix Inc All Rights Reserved.

How To Review Chapter 364 Of The Florida State Constitution

Transcription:

What Gets Lost in the IP Transition? Gillan Associates Joe Gillan NASUCA November 18, 2013 joegillan@earthlink.net 1

What Gets Lost in the IP Transition? Competition? A unknown number of consumer devices/uses? Comparable urban and rural services? 2

YOU MATTER!!!!!! This is the largest regulatory ask in history. The transition raises issues of fact facts that have to first be DISCOVERED, and then ANALYZED. The federal process makes it difficult to learn what you are not told, and to verify what you are. 3

April 18, 2007 - Verizon FCC Affidavit Both Dr. Selwyn and Mr. Gillan claim that E911 listings data overstate the number of business access lines. But they fail to consider the various ways that E911 listings data understate competition for enterprise customers. Declaration of William Taylor WC Docket No. 06-172 4

July 16, 2007 - Verizon Testimony at the state level, ratios of business E-911 listings to access lines in the 2:1 neighborhood are not unexpected. Rebuttal Testimony of Harold E. West III Case No. PUC-2007-00008 5

What Gets Lost in the IP Transition? Competition? 6

February 24, 2012 FCC Comment Verizon currently has one agreement in place covering its FiOS Digital Voice VoIP traffic, and we are negotiating others. February 25, 2013 FCC Comment Verizon currently has one agreement in place covering its FiOS Digital Voice VoIP traffic, and Verizon will continue to negotiate IP voice interconnection agreements in good faith and hopes to enter into more agreements for this traffic going forward. 7

June 26, 2013 2 In compliance with that directive, Verizon MA submitted on May 30, 2013, its voluntary commercial agreement covering its FiOS Digital Voice VoIP traffic, which Verizon has referenced in certain FCC filings. That agreement is [*** Begin Proprietary***] this is such bullshit that they are saying and who knows what but we will try to pretend that anyone that looks beneath this blacked out area cannot blah [*** End Proprietary***] To the contrary, it primarily [*** Begin Proprietary***] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxdddddxxx [*** End Proprietary***] Verizon MA also submitted an agreement that provides [*** Begin Proprietary***] dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd dddddddddddddddd [*** End Proprietary***]. 8

November 24, 2013 HO Ruling Verizon MA entered into an agreement for the exchange of VoIP traffic over an IP network and is currently exchanging VoIP traffic under that agreement. 9

Threat to Business Competition Cable Business Lines Traditional CLEC Business Lines ILEC Business Lines Source: USTELECOM, Evidence of Voice Competition and ILEC Non-Dominance Mounts, April 2, 2013. 10

What Gets Lost in the IP Transition? Competition? A unknown number of consumer devices/uses? 11

What Gets Lost in the IP Transition? Competition? A unknown number of consumer devices/uses? Comparable urban and rural services? 12

Most VoIP Services are Provided over Closed (Managed) Networks, Not the Internet VoIP Lines on Internet VoIP lines served by Closed Networks Source: USTELECOM, Evidence of Voice Competition and ILEC Non-Dominance Mounts, April 2, 2013. 13

Managed vs. OTT VoIP Vonage is estimated Managed VoIP to serve 75% of OTT subscribers Sources: USTELECOM, Evidence of Voice Competition and ILEC Non-Dominance Mounts, April 2, 2013, at 8. 14

Vonage Growth Over Past 5 Years 2.65 2.6 Subscribers (millions) 2.55 2.5 2.45 2.4 2.35 2.3 2.25 2.2 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2Q2013 15

FiOS and U-verse are not OTT on the Internet To understand the features and quality of FiOS Digital Voice, you first need to know that the service is not the same as the services you get with a little Internet adapter for your modem and phone, and it does not ever touch the public Internet. AT&T U-verse Voice service is provided over AT&T's worldclass managed network and not the public Internet. Sources: http://newscenter.verizon.com/press-releases/verizon/2010/fios-digital-voice-heres.html http://www.att.com/u-verse/explore/home-alarm.jsp. 16

CAF II Latency Requirement 17

Where is AT&T? Only 19% of AT&T s consumer lines are VoIP 30 Wireline Connections (millions) 25 20 15 10 5 AT&T Retail Consumer Circuit-Switched AT&T VoIP 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2Q2013 18

and in those areas where AT&T offers both VoIP and traditional phone service, traditional service still maintains nearly a 2:1 advantage. AT&T VoIP (U-verse) Traditional Phone Service Sources: AT&T 2Q2003 10Q filing with SEC FCC Local Competition Report issued June 2013, data as of June 2012. CDC Study on Wireless Substitution, issued June 2013, data as of December 2012. 19