Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Similar documents
Competitive Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

GENERAL. This manual addresses five local programs that are funded under the current Highway Act:

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET. Department of Rural and Municipal Aid. Office of Local Programs

Transportation Alternatives Program Guide

Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan

Update on Previous Related Transportation Enhancement Grants

REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources

Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding

Implementation Strategy

Summary of MAP-21 Matrix

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects

St. Cloud Area Planning Organization TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES

Sponsor's Guide To Non-Traditional Transportation Project Implementation

STAFF REPORT. COUNCIL Agenda # MEETING OF November 9, 2004

CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP)

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century:

New Jersey Department of Transportation. Division of Local Aid & Economic Development. Federal Aid Handbook

GUIDELINES FOR SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT FUNDING PROGRAM Revised December 2009

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization. Certification Review Report. April 2012

Transition from SAFETEA-LU to the new MAP-21 Federal Transportation Act

RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS

Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC

3.1 Historical Considerations

REPORT ON CERTIFICATION THAT THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

Koser Field. 7th St SE 2.25

William M. Lyons Volpe Center/Office of the Secretary/USDOT

Village of Spring Valley Comprehensive Plan

APPLICATION FOR STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN

2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST

CHAPTER 29 Landscape Architecture Table of Contents

Update on the Development of MAP 21 Performance Measures

SCOPE OF WORK for High Speed Rail and Intercity Passenger Rail Program Federal Grant Application Development

Chapter 5 Financial Plan

Red Wing Bridge Project. PAC #5/TAC #8 Meeting July 18, 2013

Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Surface Transportation Program Direct Attributable Project Submittal Guide Fiscal Year 2016

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS

Goals, Strategies, and Tasks

REGIONAL NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

Assessing Paved Trails for Compliance with Standards and Best Practices

Montana Business Process to Link Planning Studies and NEPA/MEPA Reviews

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

Task 1 Project Management and Project Organization Work Plan

Transportation Improvement Program FY

Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.

Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program. Ohio Department of Transportation

Transcription:

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) 2013 Workshop for project funding in 2017 and 2018

Introductions Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) program Administered by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) MnDOT District 4 staff: Jane Butzer District Program Coordinator Bridget Miller District Planning Director Merle Early State Aid Manager MnDOT District 8 staff: Jarrett Hubbard District Planner Patrick Weidemann District Planning Director Todd Broadwell Acting State Aid Engineer Stu Peterson State Aid Engineer

Introductions TE program continued... Local planning assistance provided by Regional Development Organizations (RDO) and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) Lindsey Knutson Upper Minnesota Valley Regional Development Commission (UMVRDC)

Agenda Overview TAP Overview Overview of the Local Process Application Requirements Q & A

TAP Overview

TAP Overview TAP is a program of the Federal Highway Administration The TAP provides funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; recreational trail program projects; [and] safe routes to school projects FHWA web site

TAP Overview Funded through Federal transportation bill (MAP-21) Significant Changes From SAFETEA-LU Program Consolidation Funding Reduction 80-20 funding split for ALL projects, including SRTS

TAP Overview

TAP Overview $30.0 TAP Funding Reduction $25.0 $20.0 $15.0 $10.0 $5.0 $- $27.69 Past Federal Investment $15.04 MAP-21 Distribution

TAP Overview District 4 and 8 funding levels for TE were similar to new TAP funding levels HOWEVER... this now includes the former TE Program, SRTS and Scenic Byways Overall funding decrease of approximately 40%

TAP Overview Eligible Activities Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities Safe Routes for Non-Drivers Conversion of Abandoned Railway Corridors to Trails Scenic Turnouts and Overlooks

TAP Overview Eligible Activities continued... Community Improvement Activities Outdoor Advertising Management Historic Preservation & Rehab of Historic Transportation Facilities Vegetation Management Archaeological Activities Environmental Mitigation Activities Stormwater Mitigation Wildlife Management

On-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation Transportation projects to achieve Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 compliance Safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs. Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors

Construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas Inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities Archaeological activities

Vegetation management to improve roadway safety Vegetation management to provide erosion control Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or restore/maintain habitat connectivity Environmental mitigation to address storm water management

Recreational trails program (DNR) Safe Routes to School

Transportation activities no longer eligible for TAP funding: Scenic easements Transportation museums Visitor centers Marketing and marketing plans Interpretive plans Scenic Byway corridor management plans Bicycling and pedestrian safety and education programs for adults Adult safety and education programs are eligible under the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP)

TAP Overview Relationship to Surface Transportation is REQUIRED for all projects The TAP project sponsor must illustrate the project's relationship to surface transportation in the project proposal. NTAC web site Bear in mind that the [state] DOT can impose guidelines on project eligibility more restrictive than those put forth by the FHWA. NTAC web site Eligibility does not necessarily equate to priority

TAP Overview Applying for funding is a lengthy and timeconsuming but worthwhile process Need to make sure you have a local champion to see the project through to completion Also need broad support from a variety of individuals and groups in your community Local match is required for all projects Engineering and Right-of-Way are not eligible Finding local match funding can be challenging

Overview of the Local Process

Overview of the Local Process MnDOT Administers Program in Minnesota Project ranking is done at the MnDOT District level Funds are distributed by MnDOT at the State level District 4 TAP allocation is ~$600,000 in 2017 and 2018, and District 8 ATP allocation is ~$300,000 in those years RDOs/MPOs assist with application process

Timeline October 3, 2013 TAP project solicitation announcement October 28, 2013 RDC Workshop/Forum October-November 2013 Consultation with RDO/MPO and field reviews conducted November 15, 2013 Letter of Intent deadline Feb. 1, 2014 Full grant application deadline February-March 2014 - Application review and applicant presentations(?) to TAP Subcommittee April 15, 2014 TAP award recipients announced Fall 2014 Final STIP is approved

Consultation with Local Planners Discuss your project with local planner at your RDO/MPO Your local planner will: help you determine project eligibility provide guidance on developing a competitive application ensure that your application is complete Schedule field review of project prior to completion of application Better to schedule early before the snow flies Project field reviews are not required, but are Highly Recommended Discuss your project with your local planner EARLY and OFTEN

Application Requirements

Application Requirements Section 1: General Information Section 2: Project Budget Section 3: Sponsoring Agency Resolution Section 4: Resolution Agreeing to Maintain Facility Section 5: ATP Project Evaluation Section 6: Application Checklist

Section 1: General Information Project Name Project Location Brief Project Description Sponsoring Agency Project Applicant Contact Person Signatures

Section 2: Project Budget Project Budget Page Should be fairly detailed It is recommended that you work with your local engineer to develop the budget Eligible Work/Construction Items Non eligible Items Engineering and Right-of-Way costs are NOT eligible for TAP funding Project award minimum of $50,000 for D8, recommended minimum of $100,000 for D4

Sections 3 & 4: Resolutions Section 3: Sponsoring Agency Resolution County or State-Aid City (pop. 5000+) Section 4: Resolution Agreeing to Maintain Facility County or State-Aid City (pop. 5000+) If applicant is not a county or state aid city, they can still include above resolution(s) Not required, but recommended

Section 5: ATP Project Evaluation The information provided in this section is what the TAP review committee will use to judge how your project ranks against other applications This is where you should make your case that your project should be funded More detailed answers should be provided in this section Staying within the stated application limits

Section 5: ATP Project Evaluation District 4: 1. Project relationship in a larger context 2. Project Impact or Benefit 3. The project funding and schedule must be realistic and achievable 4. Physical Design District 8: 1. Project description and overview 2. Planning and community context 3. Serves a transportation purpose 4. Ensure project deliverability Additional Points

Section 6: Application Checklist

Additional Information There is additional information included in the application materials, including... Detailed info on the eligible activities Contact information for Local Planners and MnDOT contacts Federal Program Requirements ADA Requirements, Anti-Discrimination Laws, Davis- Bacon & Copeland Acts

More info online MnDOT TAP: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/map-21/tap.html FHWA TAP: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/tap.cfm NTAP Clearinghouse (archive): http://www.enhancements.org/index

Questions??? Thanks for your attention! We can now spend some time answering your questions. For future questions, contact Lindsey Knutson at lindsey.knutson@umvrdc.org or 320.289.1981 x7.