Hawai i s PV Challenge/Opportunity UWIG Solar Integration Workshop Lahaina, Maui October 11, 2011 Mark Duda President, PO Box 37070 Honolulu HI, 96837 www.hsea.org mark@dephawaii.com
Hawai i Market Drivers
Generation Mix 80.0 percent 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Other Geothermal Wind Biomass Coal Petroleum Source: Energy Information Administration, Hawaii, Apr. 1, 2010,http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/state/state_energy_profiles.cfm?sid=HI
Rates Are High and Variable July 2011 Utility Schedule Name Low Medium High Demand/kW Residential HECO R $0.316 $0.324 $0.333 HELCO R $0.409 $0.431 $0.439 MECO-Maui R $0.367 $0.375 $0.381 KIUC D $0.429 Commercial (General Service Demand) HECO J $0.265 $10.63 HELCO J $0.384 $0.362 $0.351 $9.16 MECO-Maui J $0.352 $0.342 $0.311 $7.68 KIUC J $0.408 $6.62 HECO Companies rate information: http://www.heco.com/portal/site/heco/menuitem.508576f78baa14340b4c0610c510b1ca/?vgnextoid=0e1f813dd0aee110vgnvcm1000005c011bacrcrd&vgnextchannel=106293 49798b4110VgnVCM1000005c011bacRCRD&vgnextfmt=defau&vgnextrefresh=1&level=0&ct=article KIUC rate information: http://www.kiuc.coop/indexenergy.htm
Hawai i Rates vs. US Mainland $0.40 $0.35 $0.30 $0.25 $0.20 US Average Hawaii $0.15 $0.10 $0.05 $0.00 Residential Commercial Industrial Source: USDOE Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly,5.6.A: Average Retail Price to End User, September 2011 release (data for June 2011). (http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/index.cfm)
State of Hawaii Tax Incentives 1. HRS Section 235-12.5 Renewable Energy Technologies Income Tax Credit (RETITC) Option 1: 35 percent of installed cost; non-refundable Option 2: 24.5 percent of installed cost; refundable Option 3: 35 percent of installed cost; refundable (only for very lowincome (<$20,000 AGI) or pension-only) 1. Depreciation: MACRS Basis = full installed cost Five year schedule follows normal federal
Module Prices Continue Decline Retail Price $/watt $3.75 $3.50 $3.25 $3.00 $2.75 27% One Year Decline $2.50 $2.25 Sep 10 Oct 10 Nov 10 Dec 10 Jan 11 Feb 11 Mar 11 Apr 11 May 11 Jun 11 Jul 11 Aug 11 Sep 11 Source: Solarbuzz. http://solarbuzz.com/facts-and-figures/retail-price-environment/module-prices
Est. 2011 PV HECO only, all PV permits, through Sept. 30 kw, net metered systems only 2001-2009 25,000 HECO MECO HELCO KIUC 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Note: Net metered installs are only a portion of the total. In 2009 total installs were 14 MW indicating about only half of installs were NEM. Source: HECO Companies Net Energy Metering Annual Status Report 2009 for HECO/MECO/HELCO, personal communication with KIUC staff for KIUC. KIUC had 93.1 kw installed prior to 2005. HECO 2010 data based on approved or pending NEM applications as of August.
Project Type Mix Oahu Building Permits through 9/30/2011 million $/percent $46.3, 33% $94.9, 67% Residential Commercial
Solar Installed Capacity Cumulative Installed PV Capacity (w/dc) per Capita thru 2010 Nevada 38.8 Hawaii 32.9 New Jersey 29.6 California 27.4 Colorado 24.1 New Mexico 21 Arizona 17.2 Dist of Colombia 7.4 Connecticut 6.9 Oregon 6.2 National Average 7 Ranked by Cumulative Installed PV Capacity Source: U.S. Solar Market Trends 2010, June 2011. Page 9.
Planned/Likely HI Solar Capacity Increases 10 MW bilateral contracts approved by PUC for Oahu in 2011 Various other 2.7 or 5 MW bilateral projects planned and/or in negotiation KIUC 10 MW RFP 6 MW approved by PUC for Kauai in 2011 4 MW approved by PUC for Kauai in 2010 FIT program 2010-2012 = 80 MW (HECO/MECO/HELCO) Sempra 300 MW proposal Cancelation of 200 MW wind contract/heco reissue DG at 15% of peak load ~100-200 MW
Procurement: Tariffs and Other Channels
Net Energy Metering HECO/MECO/HELCO applies only to systems <= 100 kw per meter No program limit but subject to feeder penetration restrictions at 15% of peak load KIUC Limited to 50 kw system size and 1% of peak load Program is full NEM Pilot pays $0.20/kWh for exported energy; system sizes up to 200 kw
Standard Interconnect Typically commercial systems > 100kW All kwhs used to offset load System sized to never export any electrons/no compensation for exported energy
Feed-In Tariff Program set at 5 percent of peak load Pricing set based on technology type (PV, Wind, CSP, In-Line Hydro), system size, and state tax credit level For PV currently available on systems up to 500kW on HECO, 250kW on HELCO & MECO (<20 kw = Tier 1; >20 kw Tier 2) Larger systems coming at some point (up to 5 MW for HECO, 2.72 MW for HELCO & MECO) Two choices: Interconnect behind the utility meter offset contemporaneous load at retail rate, paid for excess generation, pay for excess consumption Interconnect outside the meter and sell all kwhs
Bilateral Utility PPA Systems up to 5 MW (HECO); 2.72 MW (MECO & HELCO) All energy exported to (or at least available for export to) utility Pricing, interconnection requirements, and other terms negotiated with utility PPA must be approved by PUC
Sample: One Year Net Cost, Grid-Tied Commercial PV System Installed Cost ($1,000,000) Federal Credit $300,000 HI Credit $350,000 Value of Federal Year 1 Depreciation (at 35%, no bonus) $57,800 Value of HI Year 1 Depreciation (at 6.4%) $12,800 Energy Savings (250 kw system, 450 sun zone, $0.30/kWh) $115,00 Net Cost after One Year ($154,400)
Residential PV with Batteries Grid-Tied Off-Grid PV System Size (watts) 5,000 6,667 kwh available to homeowner (Year 1) 7,640 7,640 PV System Cost at $5.75/watt $28,750 $38,333 Batteries Cost (3 days of full storage) $36,000 Total Cost $28,750 $74,333 Cost after Tax Credits $10,063 $26,017 Years to Payback Based on Current Utility Rates and 5% Annual Escalation Grid-Tied Off-Grid HECO 4 9 HELCO 3 7 MECO (Maui) 3.5 8 MECO (Molokai) 3.5 7 MECO (Lanai) 3 7 KIUC 3 7 Note: Years rounded to nearest half year.
Issues & Impacts Raised by PV s Value Proposition in Hawai i
1. Lots of PUC Dockets http://dms.puc.hawaii.gov/dms/ Competitive bidding (03-0372) Net energy metering (2006-0084) Intra-governmental wheeling (2007-0176) Feed-in tariff (2008-0273) PV Host (2009-0098) DG interconnection/rule 14H (2010-2015) On-bill financing (2011-0186) Reliability standards (2011-0206)
2. Interconnection Studies: Rule 14H Applies to FIT, SIA, and NEM Additional technical study may be needed based on: 1. Complexity of the grid where system is being interconnected 2. Connection to a network system 3. Plan to export power 4. Feeder penetration > 15% 5. Starting voltage drop 6. Generating facility capacity 7. Short circuit contribution ratio >5% 8. Type of interface transformer Source: Rule 14, Appendix III, Sheet 34D-8 and 34D-9.
Impact of Interconnection Study Cost of existing commercial level studies has been $30,000-$75,000 for distribution level systems Time frame > 6 months: typically shifts placed-in-service tax year Outcome can be purchase of additional equipment Interaction with legislative calendar
Location Value Maps Source: http://www.mauielectric.com/portal/site/meco/menuitem.ed4aed221358a44973b5c410c510b1ca/?vgnextoid=7a9d812edc035210vgnvcm1000005c011bacrcrd&vgnextchannel=db1d32db96315210vg nvcm1000005c011bacrcrd&vgnextfmt=default
LVM: High DG Penetration Source: http://www.mauielectric.com/portal/site/meco/menuitem.ed4aed221358a44973b5c410c510b1ca/?vgnextoid=7a9d812edc035210vgnvcm1000005c011bacrcrd&vgnextchannel=db1d32db96315210vg nvcm1000005c011bacrcrd&vgnextfmt=default
3. Curtailment Curtailment provisions in FIT contract have crippled the program because investors cannot calculate rate of return Proposed SCADA requirements down to the residential level perceived as threat to project economics DGs can cause invisible curtailment to existing IPPs Utilities not comfortable with take or pay so engineering and financial concerns are intertwined
4. Reliability What standard should non-firm renewables need to meet in order to be safely integrated? Hawai i has no objective standards Who should bear the cost of mitigation and where should it be located?
Summary/Conclusion
Summary: PV Value Proposition in Hawai i Will Remain Strong Cost declines + rate increases driving appeal of PV Consumer preferences Development of companion technologies (storage, smart grid) Policy support (sun shot, etc.) Economics of PV in Hawai i will remain strong
Summary 2: Regulatory Policy Is Not Really Keeping up with the Market Reliability standards opaque and process for improving them is slow and unwieldy No plan/system to optimize ratepayer expense for storage Many gaps in DG procurement system (NEM system caps, FIT contract flaws, etc.)
Conclusion: The View from Hawai i High cost of grid power plus low cost of PV is close to forcing a regulatory reckoning stand alone PV will soon be cheap enough to be appealing to many utility customers Regulatory model needs to adapt to make DG/PV work for utilities Or else regulatory bodies need to contemplate a smaller role for utilities in the overall generation mix
Thank You Mark Duda President, PO Box 37070 Honolulu HI, 96837 www.hsea.org mark@dephawaii.com