Massachusetts Hospital Quality & Patient Safety in a series. Summary of Trends in Nurse Staffing in Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals

Similar documents
MASSACHUSETTS HOSPITAL QUALITY & PATIENT SAFETY IN A SERIES

MASSACHUSETTS HEALTHCARE CHARTBOOK

CT Allied Health Workforce Policy Board

NDNQI. NDNQI:Transforming Data into Quality Care Rainbow Boulevard, M/S University of Kansas Medical Center

The Impact of Nursing Care on Quality 1

Introduction. The History of CMS/JCAHO Measure Alignment

HFMA s Revenue Cycle Forum

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA

Staffing Rehab Nursing Appropriately Using Patient Daily Acuity

Using Data to Understand the Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary Measure

DC Health Professional Licensing Fees

Measure Information Form

Clarification Document

Hospital Quality Initiative Overview CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES December 2005

University of Chicago Acute Care Occupational Therapy Residency Program

CAHPS : Assessing Health Care Quality From the Patient s Perspective

Guidelines for Data Collection on the American Nurses Association s National Quality Forum Endorsed Measures:

Value-Based Purchasing Program Overview. Maida Soghikian, MD Grand Rounds Scripps Green Hospital November 28, 2012

Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Center Outcomes. Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Center 2014 Outcomes

Introducing Grace Bedford. Bringing long-term, acute care closer to you

Nursing Workforce. Primary Care Workforce

Stakeholder s Report SW 75 th Ave Miami, Florida

Midwest ESOP Conference. September 11, 2015

Hospital Costs in Context: A Transparent View of the Cost of Care

Patient Experience. The Cleveland Clinic Journey. American Medical Group Association Orlando, Florida March 14, 2013

Historical perspective

Topic: Nursing Workforce Snapshot A Regional & Statewide Look

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC March 2, 2010

20/20 Vision? Overview of the Latest Workforce Projections for

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

benchmarking tools for reducing costs of care

Transforming Labor Management through Cross-Departmental Collaboration. Challenges. Internal Solutions. SSM Health Care St. Louis.

Good Samaritan Inpatient Rehabilitation Program

Subacute Inpatient MH - Adult

School Based Medicaid Claiming Program Snapshot

REGISTERED NURSES 2012

Lowering Costs and Improving Outcomes. Patient Engagement Issues. Nancy Davenport-Ennis President & CEO. September 8 th, 2009

Texas Heart Attack and Stroke Data Collection Initiative: Data Update. Nimisha Bhakta, MPH Texas Heart Attack and Stroke Summit July 24, 2015

Collected Input: Administrative Practices (Staffing/Service Volume & Staffing Mix)

Guidelines for the Operation of Burn Centers

How To Improve Quality Of Care In Rehab

Executive Total Compensation Review for Natividad Medical Center

WHAT DO WCRI STUDIES SHOW ABOUT HOW PRICES PAID BY WC AND GROUP HEALTH PAYORS COMPARE?

NEW YORK S GROWING DEMAND

Inpatient Pediatric Rehabilitation Center

May 7, Submitted Electronically

Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Repeal and Replace: Comparison of 2014 and 2015 Legislation

Exchanged Quality Data for Rehabilitation (EQUADR SM ) Patient Safety Organization & Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting

Beyond Nursing Quality Measurement: The Nation s First Regional Nursing Virtual Dashboard

Nursing Workforce Analysis - The Basics

Total Cost of Care and Resource Use Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Increasing Professional Nursing Certification: Breaking Down Barriers and Raising Up Nursing

How Health Reform Will Affect Health Care Quality and the Delivery of Services

Population Health Management For Behavioral Health. MHA s 2015 Annual Conference June 3, 2015

NOTICE OF PROPOSED AGENCY ACTION. MassHealth: Payment for Chronic Disease and Rehabilitation Hospital Services effective October 1, 2014

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC July 19, 2010

Introduction INTRODUCTION: BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASES. The prevalence of chronic noncommunicable

2/15/2015 HEALTHCARE ACCREDITATION: WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU HEALTHCARE ACCREDITATION WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU

The North Carolina Health Professions Data System Katie Gaul, MA, Research Associate

A Software Demonstration

SVH and SVH-related spending in Sonoma County generates $103 million in spending annually and 658 jobs.

Florida Hospitals Workforce Challenges: 2012 Workforce Survey Highlights

Patient and Family Education (PFE)

AMERICAN BURN ASSOCIATION BURN CENTER VERIFICATION REVIEW PROGRAM Verificatoin Criterea EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, Criterion. Level (1 or 2) Number

HEALTH PRICE TRANSPARENCY IMPROVEMENTS FOR TEXAS CONSUMERS APRIL 15, 2014 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE STAKEHOLDER MEETING

NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board.

The Journey of One Thousand Miles Begins with One Step

How To Train Health Care Workers In Connecticut

VA Boston Healthcare System West Roxbury Campus 1400 VFW Parkway West Roxbury, MA Spinal Cord Injury Center

Complex Outpatient. Injury. Rehab. Integrated, evidence-based rehab that supports a timely return to home, life, work or school

2014: Volume 4, Number 1. A publication of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Information Products & Data Analytics

AHEC Nursing Workforce Research, Planning and Development

A Look At Healthcare Spending, Employment, Pay, Benefits, And Prices

Written Statement. for the. Senate Finance Committee of The United States

Health Care Employment Projections:

Intervention Models: Innovation, Collaboration & Implementation. Andrew Bertagnolli, PhD Kent Corso, PsyD, BCBA-D Cathie Fox, PhD

Credentialing Research Lynne Grief, PhD, RN, CEN

Patient Criteria: Modeling in LTRAX

BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAPER PART 1 COVER SHEET. Meeting Date: 30 May National NHS Staff Survey report and action plan.

The VA Expert Panel: Value Through a System-Wide Nurse Staffing Model March 26, Kathleen Chapman, MSN, RN, NEA-BC, FACHE

Partial Hospitalization - MH - Adult (Managed Medicaid only Service)

Value-Based Purchasing

The new Cardiac Nurse Practitioner candidate position at Austin Health

Friends. Proposal to Designate The National Quality Forum as the National Coordinating & Standard-Setting Center for Performance Measures

ACADEMY. HealthCare. Industry Analysis & Program Overview. Presentation to WISF Health Care Subcommittee September 10, 2013

Aria Health 111 Years of Caring

Safer Staffing Nursing and Midwifery Workforce Information January 2015 Report

CLINICAL PRIVILEGE WHITE PAPER

Massachusetts Acute Care Hospital Readmissions Profile: July, 2012 to June, 2013 Boston Medical Center September 2015

Employers Centers of Excellence Network (ECEN) Frequently Asked Questions

BENEFITS AND IMPACTS OF SUD INTEGRATION WITH PRIMARY AND ACUTE MEDICAL CARE. Les Sperling Central Kansas Foundation Salina, Kansas

Workers Compensation. All Service Types. Milliman Client Report. Prepared for: Nevada Division of Industrial Relations

HOSPITAL INDUSTRY IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation

For trauma, there are some additional attributes that are unique and complex:

IOM National Cancer Policy Forum: Ensuring Quality Cancer Care through the Oncology Workforce

Respiratory Therapist

Providing a Lift. New lifting techniques are explored in an effort to prevent injuries of both patients and health care workers.

The AARC Respiratory Therapist Human Resources Study 2000:

Health Care Employment Projections:

Charting the Future of Primary Care: Care Coordination/Case Management

Transcription:

Massachusetts Hospital Quality & Patient Safety in a series Summary of Trends in Nurse Staffing in Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals FEBRUARY 2013

Hospital-specific nurse staffing data for nearly all hospitals across Massachusetts are reported at the PatientCareLink website (www.patientcarelink.org). The staffing plans and reports are developed using the metric of Worked Hours Per Patient Day (WHPPD). This is the number of direct care hours planned for a patient from patient care team members in a 24-hour period. For all Massachusetts adult medical, surgical, and medical/surgical combined units in acute care hospitals participating in PatientCareLink, the median hospital actual worked hours per patient day for all direct caregivers grew from 8.01 in 2006 to 8.76 2011, an increase of 9.36%. For the same time period, the median hospital actual worked hours per patient day for registered nurses (RNs) increased by 7.9%, from 5.57 worked hours per patient day to 6.01. For all Massachusetts adult critical care units in acute care hospitals participating in PatientCareLink the actual worked hours per patient day for all direct caregivers decreased by less than half of 1% at the median and increased by less than 1% for the weighted average. The largest percentage change for all direct caregivers was an increase of 5.43% in the 75th percentile. (That is, those hospitals whose WHPPD exceeded 75% of their peers saw the greatest increase in WHPPD.) For the same period, the median hospital actual hours worked per patient day for registered nurses increased by 1.34%. The largest percentage change for registered nurses was an increase of 1.72% in the 25th percentile. The Massachusetts Hospital Association (MHA) and the Organization of Nurse Leaders of MA-RI (ONL) have organized hospitals throughout the state in a voluntary program to report nurse staffing plans and reports, as part of the PatientCareLink initiative. Launched in 2005, PatientCareLink (PCL) helps participating hospitals provide transparent staffing and patient safety information to the public and other healthcare stakeholders, and also offers valid and reliable information on quality and safety to patients and healthcare workers alike. The principles of PCL include providing staffing that meets patient needs and making hospital data and performance measures transparent and publicly available as evidenced at www.patientcarelink.org.

Background on Staffing and Worked Hours Per Patient Day Through PatientCareLink (PCL), hospitals are committed to the principles of healthcare quality and safety, providing staffing that meets patient needs, making hospital data and performance measures transparent and publicly available, developing the workforce, and promoting a safe, respectful, and supportive working environment. Hospitals are supporting these principles by voluntarily making staffing plans available to patients and the public and posting them on the PCL website, by following a common framework of measurement and reporting based on national performance measures and by monitoring and reporting progress on efforts to improve the quality of care and patient safety. Acute care and specialty care hospitals in Massachusetts have been reporting detailed nurse staffing plans and reports since 2006 (www.patientcarelink.org/hospital-data/staffing-plans.aspx ). Staffing plans are developed based on the anticipated patient volume and on the anticipated needs of the patients assigned to the unit. Plans are built with the understanding that they need to be flexible to account for patient care changes that occur over the course of a day and are adjusted to account for those changes. Staffing reports reflect the actual hours worked by care team members in providing direct care to patients. The reports also identify reasons why the actual staffing varied from the planned or budgeted staffing for time period. Staffing plans and reports are developed using the metric of worked hours per patient day (WHPPD). This is defined as the number of direct care hours planned (or worked) for a patient from patient care team members in a 24-hour period. WHPPD is a measure that is nationally recognized and part of the National Quality Forum s Nurse Sensitive Measure Set (JCAHO, 2005 1 ). All data points are for WHPPD, unless indicated otherwise. Acute care hospitals have reported staffing data for adult critical care, adult intermediate care or step-down care, medical only, surgical only, combined medical/surgical, behavioral health, rehabilitation, and emergency department units. Rehabilitation hospitals and long-term acute care hospitals have reported staffing data for rehabilitation units and long-term acute care units, respectively. This report focuses on (1) aggregate staffing data trends in acute care hospitals for all medical only, surgical only, and combined medicals/surgical units, as well as (2) aggregate staffing data trends for acute care hospital critical care units. Staffing plans identify direct caregivers and additional team members who contribute to the care of patients. Many healthcare professionals care for patients as part of a team. Registered nurses provide direct care to patients 24 hours a day, seven days a week and are partners with many other healthcare professionals, including physicians, to meet varying patient needs. On staffing plans, Direct Caregivers may include nursing aides, assistants, and respiratory therapists, among others. Team members listed in the Additional Care Team Member section, such as clinical pharmacists, nutritionists, IV Therapy Teams, and Staff Educators also help coordinate and deliver patient care. This report focuses on (1) All Direct Caregivers, which include registered nurses and all other direct caregivers who have productive hours with patient care responsibilities greater than 50% of their shift and who are replaced if sick; as well as (2) RNs Only. There are many variables to consider in terms of what constitutes safe, efficient staffing for a particular hospital unit. This may be addressed in the Additional Unit Information section of PatientCareLink. Every patient care unit is different based upon the types of patients cared for on that unit, and the way in which care is organized and delivered there. Staffing for individual units can vary based on the education and experience level of the staff, support from nurse Summary of Trends in Nurse Staffing in Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals 1

educators and nurse managers on a given unit, as well as on the unique characteristics and mission of the hospital. Because of these differences, there will be a difference in the WHPPD rates among hospitals. Staffing trends of WHPPD are represented by the distribution of measures at the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles; and the weighted average. Percentiles represent a value on a scale that indicates the percent of a distribution that is equal to or below it. The 50th percentile (median) and the weighted average WHPPD measures best describe the trends for the hospitals as a group. For example, a score at the 50th percentile is equal to or better than 50 percent of the scores. The weighted average is the result of dividing the sum of the total actual worked hours in all hospitals by the total actual patient days of all hospitals. Using 2011 as a representative year, this report includes data for 61 acute care hospitals reporting on 284 medical, surgical, and medical/surgical combined units. There are 63 acute care hospitals reporting on 105 critical care units. 2 For a wealth of data, visit www.patientcarelink.org

Findings Figure 1 Adult Medical, Surgical and Med/Surg Combined Units Staffing Trends All Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals Participating in PatientCareLink Includes Actual Worked Hours for All Direct Caregivers 2006 2011 10.00 9.50 Total Actual Worked Hours Per Patient Day 9.00 8.50 8.00 7.50 7.00 6.50 6.00 2006 (N=265) 2007 (N=271) 2008 (N=273) 2009 (N=284) 2010 (N=283) 2011 (N=284) % Change from 2006 to 2011 75th 8.72 9.27 9.59 9.28 9.56 9.71 11.35 50th 8.01 8.17 8.43 8.38 8.62 8.76 9.36 25th 7.46 7.65 7.63 7.75 7.87 7.96 6.70 Wtd. Avg. 8.13 8.45 8.64 8.62 8.68 8.76 7.75 Std. Dev. 1.21 1.39 1.42 1.37 1.52 1.54 Figure 1 displays the staffing trend from 2006-2011 for WHPPD for all direct caregivers in adult medical, surgical, and medical/surgical units in acute care hospitals. There were increases at the 25th, 50th, 75th percentiles and the weighted average, indicating an increase in nursing care intensity. The largest percentage increase occurred at the 75th percentile with actual worked hours growing from 8.72 in 2006 to 9.71 in 2011, an increase of 11.35%. It is worth noting that the statewide acute care hospital average case-mix index (CMI) increased from 0.996 in FY 2006 to 1.044 in FY 2010 (the latest period available), an increase of 4.5% 2. This compares with an increase of 6.8% in WHPPD for the same period (8.13 WHPPD in FY 2006 vs. 8.68 in FY 2010). Case mix index (CMI) is the average diagnosis-related group (DRG) weight for all of a hospital s inpatients. Each DRG has a specific weight that is related to the amount of resources needed to treat that condition in a specific kind of patient. The mix of cases in a hospital reflects the diversity, clinical complexity and the needs for resources in the population of patients in a hospital. Summary of Trends in Nurse Staffing in Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals 3

Figure 2 Adult Medical, Surgical and Med/Surg Combined Units Staffing Trends All Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals Participating in PatientCareLink Includes Actual Worked Hours for RNs Only 2006 2011 8.00 7.50 Total Actual Worked Hours Per Patient Day 7.00 6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 4.50 4.00 2006 (N=265) 2007 (N=271) 2008 (N=273) 2009 (N=284) 2010 (N=283) 2011 (N=284) % Change from 2006 to 2011 75th 6.32 6.61 6.76 6.63 6.76 6.94 9.81 50th 5.57 5.70 5.79 5.79 5.86 6.01 7.90 25th 5.01 5.09 5.16 5.28 5.44 5.44 8.58 Wtd. Avg. 5.68 5.88 6.03 6.06 6.20 6.26 10.21 Std. Dev. 1.34 1.27 1.30 1.27 1.39 1.38 Figure 2 displays the staffing trend from 2006-2011 for WHPPD for registered nurses only in adult medical, surgical, and medical/surgical units in acute care hospitals. WHPPD increased at the 25th, 50th, 75th percentiles and the weighted average, indicating an increase in nursing care intensity. The largest percentage change occurred for the weighted average with actual worked hours for RNs growing from 5.68 in 2006 to 6.26 in 2011; an increase of 10.21%. 4 For a wealth of data, visit www.patientcarelink.org

Figure 3 Adult Critical Care Units Staffing Trends All Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals Participating in PatientCareLink Includes Actual Worked Hours for All Direct Caregivers 2006 2011 22.00 21.50 21.00 20.50 Total Actual Worked Hours Per Patient Day 20.00 19.50 19.00 18.50 18.00 17.50 17.00 16.50 16.00 15.50 15.00 14.50 14.00 2006 (N=111) 2007 (N=104) 2008 (N=105) 2009 (N=105) 2010 (N=104) 2011 (N=105) % Change from 2006 to 2011 75th 19.70 20.77 20.80 20.78 20.70 20.77 5.43 50th 17.66 17.93 18.51 18.06 17.86 17.59 -.40 25th 15.62 15.82 16.02 16.02 16.34 15.74.77 Wtd. Avg. 18.38 18.85 19.08 18.79 18.73 18.41.16 Std. Dev. 3.67 4.00 4.09 3.79 3.59 3.63 Figure 3 displays the staffing trend from 2006-2011 for WHPPD for all direct caregivers in critical care units in acute care hospitals. WHPPD increased at the 25th and 75th percentiles and for the weighted average, indicating an increase in nursing care intensity, though the 25th percentile and weighted average grew by less than 1%. WHPPD at the 50th percentile decreased by less than half of 1%. The number of patient care units included in the samples decreased slightly during the time period studied. The largest percentage change occurred in the 75th percentile with WHPPD increasing from 19.70 in 2006 to 20.77 in 2011, up 5.43%. Summary of Trends in Nurse Staffing in Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals 5

Figure 4 Adult Critical Care Units Staffing Trends All Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals Participating in PatientCareLink Includes Actual Worked Hours for RNs Only 2006 2011 21.00 20.50 20.00 19.50 Total Actual Worked Hours Per Patient Day 19.00 18.50 18.00 17.50 17.00 16.50 16.00 15.50 15.00 14.50 14.00 13.50 13.00 2006 (N=111) 2007 (N=104) 2008 (N=105) 2009 (N=105) 2010 (N=104) 2011 (N=105) % Change from 2006 to 2011 75th 18.11 18.16 18.59 18.31 18.22 18.18 0.39 50th 15.64 15.89 16.18 15.88 16.20 15.85 1.32 25th 13.97 14.45 14.63 14.73 14.36 14.21 1.72 Wtd. Avg. 16.21 16.6 16.72 16.52 16.63 16.3 0.56 Std. Dev. 3.42 3.28 3.39 3.17 3.03 3.11 Figure 4 Figure 4 displays the staffing trend from 2006-2011 for WHPPD for all registered nurses only in critical care units in acute care hospitals. WHPPD increased at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles and the weighted average, indicating an increase in nursing care intensity. The largest percentage change occurred in the 25th percentile with WHPPD increasing from 13.97 in 2006 to 14.21 in 2011, an increase of 1.72%. Each of the figures also displays the standard deviation for WHPPD for all the hospitals. The only notable change over the 2006 2011 period was a drop in the standard deviation for acute care hospital critical care units for RNs only from 3.42 to 3.11. This change indicates that the distribution of WHPPD across all hospitals narrowed or became more uniform. 6 For a wealth of data, visit www.patientcarelink.org

Summary For all Massachusetts adult medical, surgical, and medical/surgical combined units in acute care hospitals participating in PatientCareLink, the WHPPD for all direct caregivers increased at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, and for the weighted average. The median hospital WHPPD for all caregivers increased by 9.36% from 2006 to 2011. For the same time period, WHPPD for registered nurses increased at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, and for the weighted average. The median hospital WHPPD for registered nurses increased by 7.9%. For all Massachusetts adult critical care units in acute care hospitals participating in PatientCareLink, WHPPD for all direct caregivers increased at the 25th and 75th percentiles. WHPPD for all caregivers increased by 5.43% from 2006 to 2011 at the 75th percentile. For the same time period, WHPPD for registered nurses increased at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, and for the weighted average, though by small amounts. The actual worked hours for registered nurses in the 25th percentile increased by 1.72%. The distribution of WHPPD for RNs only in critical care units narrowed, indicating more uniform staffing of such units across hospitals. The public can monitor hospital-specific nurse staffing data for nearly all hospitals across Massachusetts at the PatientCareLink website. The information is updated on an annual basis and contains both planned staffing by unit, by shift for each day of the week, along with comparison of actual staffing versus planned staffing as measured by WHPPD. End Notes 1 The Joint Commission Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (2005), Implementation guide for the NQF endorsed nursing-sensitive care performance measures. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission. 2 Massachusetts Center for Health Information and Analysis, Hospital Summary Utilization Data Files, Case Mix Indices in Massachusetts, HSD04; www.mass.gov/chia/researcher/health-care-delivery/hcf-data-resources/hospital-summary-utilization/, accessed December 27, 2012. Summary of Trends in Nurse Staffing in Massachusetts Acute Care Hospitals 7

Notes 8 For a wealth of data, visit www.patientcarelink.org

5 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803-5096 www.mhalink.org