Stepping Up: The Nation s Top K-12 Education Foundations

Similar documents
2010 Allocations to States of Volume Cap for Qualified School Construction Bonds

Grantee City State Award. Maricopa County Phoenix AZ $749,999. Colorado Youth Matter Denver CO $749,900

The Most Affordable Cities For Individuals to Buy Health Insurance


Construction Initiative: Distribution of $24.8 Billion In Bonding Authority Initial Estimates for H.R. 4094

APPENDIX B. STATE AGENCY ADDRESSES FOR INTERSTATE UIB CLAIMS

2016 Individual Exchange Premiums updated November 4, 2015

STATE INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING INFORMATION DOCUMENT

National Bureau for Academic Accreditation And Education Quality Assurance PUBLIC HEALTH

Atlanta Rankings 2014

ANGELOUECONOMICS 2012 INDUSTRY HOTSPOTS

Hail-related claims under comprehensive coverage

in Large Cities,

Rates are valid through March 31, 2014.

ANTHONY P. CARNEVALE NICOLE SMITH JEFF STROHL

LexisNexis Law Firm Billable Hours Survey Top Line Report. June 11, 2012

Physical Therapy Marketing Success :: physical therapy assistant schools usa

NSSE 2014 Selected Comparison Groups University of North Carolina at Charlotte

INTRODUCTION. Figure 1. Contributions by Source and Year: (Billions of dollars)

APPENDIX 1: SURVEY. Copyright 2010 Major, Lindsey & Africa, LLC. All rights reserved.

Alabama Commission of Higher Education P. O. Box Montgomery, AL. Alabama

The MetLife Market Survey of Assisted Living Costs

Number of Liver Transplants Performed Updated October 2005

Initial Accreditation

The MetLife Market Survey of Nursing Home & Home Care Costs

National Bureau for Academic Accreditation And Education Quality Assurance LINGUISTICS # UNIVERSITY CITY STATE DEGREE MAJOR SPECIALTY RESTRICTION

Physical Therapy Marketing Success --->>> Click Here > Check Here <

FOR RELEASE: 3/23/00 IR IRS EXPANDS LOW-INCOME TAXPAYER CLINIC GRANTS, AWARDS $4.4 MILLION TO PROGRAMS IN 32 STATES

VCF Program Statistics (Represents activity through the end of the day on June 30, 2015)

List of low tuition universities in the USA. 1. Louisiana Tech University, LA Total Cost to. International Students: $17,472

Department of Veterans Affairs Quarterly Notice to Congress on Data Breaches Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2015 April 1, 2015 through June 30, 2015

Table 1: Advertising, Marketing and Promotional Expense as a Percentage of Net Operating Revenue

How much are teachers really paid? A Nationwide Analysis of Teacher Pay

Master s Programs Offering Dual/Joint Degrees Report for NADD October 2012

IACP National Law Enforcement First Line Supervisor Training on Violence Against Women Number of Departments Trained by State

University of Saint Joseph College of Pharmacy

Physical Therapy Marketing Success :: physical therapy assistant schools usa

Health Insurance Price Index Report for Open Enrollment and Q May 2014

Foreign Language Enrollments in K 12 Public Schools: Are Students Prepared for a Global Society?

Notices of Cancellation / Nonrenewal and / or Other Related Forms

Health Insurance Exchanges and the Medicaid Expansion After the Supreme Court Decision: State Actions and Key Implementation Issues

States Served. CDFI Fund 601 Thirteenth Street, NW, Suite 200, South, Washington, DC (202)

50-State Analysis. School Attendance Age Limits. 700 Broadway, Suite 810 Denver, CO Fax:

Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Associations Affected by Freestone Ins Co Insolvency. Name Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Code Tel Number

EXHIBIT A. Elder Law Certification Review Course Orlando, FL The Florida Bar Continuing Legal Education Committee and Elder Law Section

Physical Therapy Marketing Success :: physical therapy assistant schools usa

Department of Banking and Finance

Cancellation of Debt (COD) R. Bruce McCommons Harford County, MD TrC 12/4/2013

Physical Therapy Marketing Success :: physical therapy assistant schools usa

List of Allocation Recipients

Benefits of Selling WorkLife 65

Physical Therapy Marketing Success :: physical therapy assistant schools usa

Qualified School Construction Bond Allocations for This Notice sets forth the maximum face amount of qualified school

CDFI FUND NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT PROGRAM:

Tax Rates and Tax Burdens In The District of Columbia - A Nationwide Comparison

State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Agencies

AXA Advisors Retail Distribution Overview. September 23, 2004

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona NOTICE TO: DEBTOR ATTORNEYS, BANKRUPTCY PETITION PREPARERS AND DEBTORS

How to Change Your Address with the Immigration Court and Government Attorneys

MLGW s Average Residential Utility Bill Ranks the Lowest

Table of Contents. Enhanced Use Leases Awarded. Introductory Statement Lease Awards Departmental Enhanced-Use Lease Priorities...

Community College Survey of Student Engagement Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Spring 2009

How To Get A National Rac (And Mac)

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: Weekly Progress Report on Recovery Act Spending

Ethernet Access (Formerly Converged Ethernet Access) Operations Manual

THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona

Annual Survey of Public Employment & Payroll Summary Report: 2013

State Insurance Information

ANTI FRAUD BUREAUS ALASKA ARKANSAS ARIZONA CALIFORNIA

2010 Utility Bill Comparisons for Selected U.S. Cities

AZ State Board of Physical Therapy, 1400 W Washington, Suite 230, Phoenix, AZ 85007, Phone: Fax:

LexisNexis Law Firm Billable Hours Survey Report

ENS Governmental Format Status (As of 06/16/2008)

Florida Workers Comp Market

University of Alabama School of Medicine 2016 Match Results by PGY1 Location

School Breakfast: Making It Work in Large School Districts

GROWTH Who We Educate

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

Community College/Technical Institute Mission Convergence Study

New York Public School Spending In Perspec7ve

Mortgage Delinquency and Foreclosure Trends Florida

Office of Institutional Research. Community College Survey of Student Engagement Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice.

TABLE 37. Higher education R&D expenditures at institutions with a medical school, by state, institutional control, and institution: FY 2011

Community College Survey of Student Engagement Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice -Full-time and Part-time Student Comparisons-

STATE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION RATES IN 2009 FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE

PEER Analysis of OSHA Recordkeeping Inspections Done Pursuant to its National Emphasis Program (NEP)(10/09-8/10) SUMMARY OF DATA

CPT Codes For Spirometry

National Electric Rate Survey

Tax Rates and Tax Burdens in the District of Columbia - A Nationwide Comparison. Government of the District of Columbia. Vincent C.

Health Insurance Coverage of Children Under Age 19: 2008 and 2009

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORMATION

Transcription:

Advocating the importance of K-12 education foundations while recognizing those that do it best E X E C U T I V E S T U D Y & N A T I O N A L R A N K I N G S : 2 0 1 5 sponsored by conducted by

1 Stepping Up is the nation s only annual study that ranks K-12 education foundations. Introduction to the 2015 Study and Rankings Stepping Up is the nation s only study and ranking of K-12 education foundations. The annual study ranks the top 50 education foundations in the nation, and the top 10 in each of four divisions that allow for foundation comparisons of similar size. This year s study expanded in size, making it more competitive than ever before. Stepping Up 2015 included K-12 education foundations in the 200 largest school districts by population, expanding from the previous study s top 100 largest school districts in 2014. Efforts were made to include top-performing foundations in school districts smaller than the 200 largest through the National Schools Foundation Association (NSFA) and various state education foundation associations. We want to include all of the top-performers regardless of the size of the district they support, said Dewey Caruthers, president of dewey & associates (d&a) and the study author. C O N T E N T S Introduction to 2015 Study and Rankings pg. 1 Acknowledgements pg. 1 Nation s Top 25 pg. 2 Remaining Top 50 pg. 3 Top 50 Analysis pg. 4 Top 10 Division Rankings pg. 6 Top 10 Division Analysis pg. 8 Study Methodology pg. 9 About dewey & associates pg. 10 Acknowledgements d&a thanks Bill Hoffman, who is chair of the board of directors for the National Schools Foundation Association (NSFA), for his continued input, feedback and insight into our Stepping Up study. Bill is a valuable thought-leader for the K-12 education foundation industry.

2 Top 25 1. Pinellas Foundation (FL) 2. Public Foundation (TN) 3. Brevard Schools Foundation (FL) 4. Omaha Schools Foundation (NE) 5. Achieve Minneapolis (MN) 6. Hillsborough Foundation (FL) 7. Albuquerque Public Schools Foundation (NM) 8. Douglas County al Foundation (CO) 9. DC Public Fund (DC) 10. The Fund for Public Schools (NY) - TIE 10. Denver Public Schools (CO) - TIE 12. Foundation for Newark s Future (NJ) 13. The Foundation for Osceola (FL) 14. Clark County Public Foundation (NV) 15. The Foundation for Tulsa Schools (OK) 16. Foundation for Seminole County Public Schools (FL) 17. Spring Branch Foundation (TX) 18. All Hands Raised (OR) 19. Broward Foundation (FL) 20. Prince William Co. Public Schools Foundation (VA) 21. Foundation of Collier County (FL) 22. New Visions for Public Schools (NY) 23. The Boston al Development Foundation (MA) 24. The Great Schools Partnership Charitable Trust (TN) 25. Children First Fund: The Chicago Public Schools Foundation (IL)

3 Remaining Top 50 26. San Francisco Fund (CA) 27. Fund for Excellence (MD) 28. Ogden School Foundation (UT) 29. Philadelphia Fund (PA) 30. San Antonio Partnership (TX) 31. Cy-Fair al Foundation (TX) 32. Memphis City School Foundation (TN) 33. Northside Foundation (TX) 34. Alpine School District Foundation (UT) - TIE 34. Humble ISD Foundation (TX) - TIE 36. The Foundation for Oklahoma City Public Schools (OK) 37. Public education Foundation of Marion County (FL) 38. Polk Foundation (FL) 39. Frisco Foundation (TX) 40. SAISD Foundation (TX) 41. Nashville Public Foundation (TN) 42. Shawnee Mission Foundation (KS) 43. Foundation for Lee Co. Public Schools (FL) 44. Lewisville Foundation (TX) 45. Lafayette Foundation (LA) 46. Davis Foundation (UT) 47. West Contra Costa Public Fund (CA) 48. Montgomery County Public Schools al Foundation (MD) 49. Saint Paul Public Schools Foundation (MN) 50. Plano ISD Foundation (TX)

4 Top 50 Analysis Florida had the most foundations represented in the top 50 with 10, and Texas right behind at 9 the Lone Star State gaining ground from last year when Florida had 12 and Texas 9. Numerous states maintained similar representations as last year; Utah this year with 3 and last year 4; Colorado and California this year with 2 and last year 3; and Tennessee holding steady with 4. Florida and Texas perform well for four main reasons. Florida and Texas continue to have the most foundations represented in the top 50. First and foremost, both are large states with large student populations and large numbers of K-12 education foundations. States with the most education foundations have a better chance of having more representation in the top 50, Caruthers noted. Second, many of the education foundations in these states have been around longer, providing them with more years to evolve. Many of the foundations in Florida and Texas were formed in the 1980s or before, Caruthers said. $425 million Amount held in assets by K-12 education foundations in 200 largest school districts in 2013 Third, Florida and Texas have strong, active state associations that are helping their education foundation members grow through annual conferences, regional training workshops, and other resources. The Consortium of Florida was founded in 1987 and has 61 foundation members (there are 67 county-wide school districts in Florida); and the Texas Foundation Network, which is administered by the Texas Pioneer Foundation, has 130 members. Fourth is the spirit of cooperation among foundations in these two states. I see a lot of cooperation over competition, Caruthers said, noting these foundations are working hard to help each other.

5 $350 million Amount raised by K-12 education foundations in 200 largest school districts in 2013 Top 50 Analysis (continued) Pinellas Foundation and Omaha Schools Foundation were the only two ranked in the top five last year to remain in the this year s top 5. Pinellas continued to be ranked first, and Omaha ranked fourth, down from third last year. Three foundations ranked in the top 10 last year continued in this year s top 10: Denver Public Schools Foundation, The Fund for Public Schools, Hillsborough Foundation. Two foundations ranking in the teens last year moved into the top 10 this year. Brevard Schools Foundation, ranked 16 th last year, moved into third place this year; and Douglas County al Foundation, ranked 14 th last year, moved into the number 8 spot this year. Other significant jumps from last year: Albuquerque Public Schools Foundation jumped from 33 rd last year to 7 th this year; Broward Foundation 28 th last year to 19 th this year; Prince William Co. Public Schools Foundation last year 36 th to 20 th this year. Making Division 1 more competitive, Brevard, Albuquerque, Broward, and Prince William all jumped from Division 2 to Division 1 this year due to higher revenues. This year s competition was fierce. Those foundations that dropped in the rankings, but stayed in the top 50, should still be pleased with their result. New Jersey, D.C., Minnesota, Kansas and Oklahoma were represented in the top 50 for the first time this year. This year s rankings were even more competitive than last year, study author Caruthers said. Those foundations that dropped in ranking but stayed in the top 50 should still be pleased with their result, he said, noting it is a serious accomplishment to make it into the top 50 K-12 education foundations in the nation.

Division 1: Top 10 National Ranking (Division 1 is foundations with $2 million or more in revenues) 6 1. Pinellas Foundation (FL) 2. Public Foundation (TN) 3. Brevard Schools Foundation (FL) 4. Omaha Schools Foundation (NE) 5. Achieve Minneapolis (MN) 6. Hillsborough Foundation (FL) 7. Albuquerque Public Schools Foundation (NM) 8. Douglas County al Foundation (CO) 9. DC Public Fund (DC) 10. The Fund for Public Schools (NY) - TIE 10. Denver Public Schools (CO) - TIE Division 2: Top 10 National Ranking (Division 2 is foundations with $1 million to $1,999,999 in revenues) 1. Spring Branch Foundation (TX) 2. San Francisco Fund (CA) 3. Cy-Fair al Foundation (TX) 4. Northside Foundation (TX) 5. Humble ISD Foundation (TX) - TIE 5. Alpine School District Foundation (UT) - TIE 7. The Foundation for Oklahoma City Public Schools (OK) 8. Polk Foundation and Business Partnership (FL) 9. SAISD Foundation (TX) 10. Nashville Public Foundation (TX)

Division 3: Top 10 National Ranking (Division 3 is foundations with $500,000 - $999,999 in revenues) 7 1. Ogden School Foundation (UT) 2. Public Foundation of Marion County (FL) 3. Frisco Foundation (TX) 4. Shawnee Mission Foundation (KS) 5. Lewisville Foundation (TX) 6. Lafayette Foundation (LA) 7. Foundation of Sarasota (FL) 8. Escambia County Public Schools Foundation (FL) 9. al Foundation of Lake County (FL) 10. Fort Bend ISD Foundation (TX) Division 4: Top 10 National Ranking (Division 4 is foundations with less than $500,000 in revenues) 1. IPS Foundation (IN) 2. Clear Creek Foundation (TX) 3. Chesterfield Public Foundation (VA) 4. Mesquite ISD Foundation (TX) 5. Riverside al Enrichment Foundation (CA) 6. BEST Foundation (TX) 7. RISD Excellence in Foundation (TX) - TIE 7. Virginia Beach Public Schools Foundation (VA) - TIE 9. Foundation of Indian River County (FL) - TIE 9. Pasadena ISD Foundation (TX) - TIE

Top 10 Division Analysis The top spots in Divisions 2, 3 and 4 this year are occupied by newcomers to the study: Spring Branch Foundation, Ogden Schools Foundation, IPS Foundation respectively. Additionally, in Division 3 the second, third and fourth place holders are newcomers; and in Division 4 the second and fourth are new. Some of these newcomers are from states that have yet to be represented in the study: Indiana and Kansas. 8 Texas had the most foundations represented in the top division rankings with 14; Florida followed with 9; and Colorado, California and Virginia each had 2. Some foundations shifted divisions due to increases in revenues. For example, Brevard Schools Foundation ranked number one in Division 2 last year, but its increase in revenues placed it in Division 1 this year where it finished third. In Division 2 which was highly competitive with a large number of very strong foundations Cy-Fair Foundation and Northside Foundation each movedup a notch by ranking third and fourth (up from fourth and fifth last year). Division 1 top ten mirrors the overall national ranking, simply making the division the top 10 in the nation. We developed this year a badge specifically for foundations ranking in the top 10 in divisions, Caruthers said. These are solid foundations that need a branding element, just like the nation s top 50, to illustrate their accomplishment. Those foundations ranking overall nationally and in a division will be able to display both badges. Each year foundations place the badges on letterhead, websites, business cards and other communications. Texas had more foundations ranked in divisions than Florida: 14 and 9 respectively. $181 million Amount spent on grants and programs (less salaries) by K-12 education foundations in 200 largest school districts in 2013

Study Methodology Stepping Up uses eight performance categories to rank the foundations nationally and in each division. The eight performance categories address four of the most important issues to K-12 foundations: Resources to enhance public education (annual revenues, revenues per student) Long-term financial sustainability (total assets, assets per student, investment income) Resources invested into programs (total grants, programs and similar amounts paid and per student both less salaries and benefits) Human capital (volunteers) Per student calculations are added to better reveal the impact a foundation is having based on the number of students in the district. Some foundations raise large amounts of money but when compared to the number of students in their districts it becomes clear the impact on most students is minimal, Caruthers said. School district populations are for 2013 and were gathered Aug-Sept 2015 from the source Proximity One. The rankings are the collective score of all eight performance categories. The foundations that appear in the most categories were ranked highest, emphasizing the importance of being wellrounded. Data for the Stepping Up study is from the foundations 990, which is a financial report non-profits use annually to report to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. The 2015 Stepping Up study uses the most recent 990 data available for all foundations included in this study, which is from 2013. 9 Performance Categories: 1. Total Revenues 2. Revenues per Student 3. Total Assets 4. Assets per Student 5. Grant and Program Expenses 6. Grant and Program Expenses per Student 7. Investment Income 8. Volunteers This year s study uses data from foundations 990s from 2013, the most recent data available. In addition to the national rankings, there are four revenuebased divisions, followed by a number of foundations in each division this year: Division 1: $2 million or more (36 foundations) Division 2: $1 million to $1,999,999 (25 foundations) Division 3: $500,000 to $999,999 (29 foundations) Division 4: Less than $500,000 (83 foundations) 67,000 Number of volunteers utilized by K- 12 education foundations in 200 largest school districts in 2013

10 About dewey & associates Founded in 2000, dewey & associates (d&a) is a national management and strategy consulting practice with expertise in three emerging youth education issues: Growing K-12 education foundations (enhancing public education) Preventing childhood obesity (innovating public health) Reducing arrests for common youth misbehavior (reforming juvenile justice) Founder Dewey Caruthers is the author of nationally significant studies in these areas of expertise. Dewey speaks at national and state conferences on all three topics. His work has been funded by national, state and local foundations; state and county govt. agencies; and children s hospitals. For 15 years d&a has focused on measurable and meaningful outcomes on a wide range of social change and social justice issues, including the firm s social entrepreneurial venture called Kidz Bite Back that is innovating childhood obesity prevention. To contact Dewey: Dewey@deweyandassociates.com / phone 813-294-5612.