Beating Cellular Congestion

Similar documents
communication over wireless link handling mobile user who changes point of attachment to network

The cost and performance benefits of 80 GHz links compared to short-haul GHz licensed frequency band products

Internet Service Overview

Wireless Broadband Access

app coverage applied EXTRACT FROM THE ERICSSON MOBILITY REPORT

Wireless Ethernet LAN (WLAN) General a/802.11b/802.11g FAQ

Satellite Basics. Benefits of Satellite

EE4367 Telecom. Switching & Transmission. Prof. Murat Torlak

Defining the Smart Grid WAN

CONNECTING THE WIRELESS TO THE WIRED NETWORK. By: Russ Schomber VP Network Services, Backhaul Services Group

Motorola s Wireless Broadband Point-to-Point Solutions. The PTP 100, 400 & 600 Series Part of Motorola s MOTOwi4 portfolio

Attenuation (amplitude of the wave loses strength thereby the signal power) Refraction Reflection Shadowing Scattering Diffraction

Environmental Monitoring: Guide to Selecting Wireless Communication Solutions

Section 2: Overview of Wireless Broadband Networks

Application Note License-Exempt Gigabit Ethernet Microwave Radio Applications

App coverage. ericsson White paper Uen Rev B August 2015

NEW WORLD TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED. 2 nd Trial Test Report on 3.5GHz Broadband Wireless Access Technology

ZyXEL Smart Antenna - The solution to Wi-Fi challenges

Product Overview. Steve Erickson

12. INDOOR INSTALLATION

Making Communities Better with Broadband

EKT 331/4 COMMUNICATION NETWORK

Small Cell Technology Overview ( and 3.5GHz Small Cell CBS Band)

Deployment Trends That Impact Your Business

Carrier-Grade. Wi-Fi Solutions. Wi-Fi Solutions

NEWSGATHERING TRANSMISSION TECHNIQUES. Ennes Workshop Miami, FL March 8, 2013 Kevin Dennis Regional Sales Manager

What is ? Why are standards important?

MEDIA TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION. General issues to be considered when planning SFNs

Wireless Surveillance for Outdoor Environments

Delivering 4x4 MIMO for LTE Mobile Devices. March SkyCross Dual imat 4x4 MIMO Technology for LTE. Introduction

Rethinking Small Cell Backhaul

Wireless LAN Concepts

BMS Digital Microwave Solutions for National Security & Defense

Troubleshooting Problems Affecting Radio Frequency Communication

Wireless Internet. Is an system to provide connectivity to customers to the Internet. Service Provider (WISP) TECHNICAL INFO.

Cisco Outdoor Wireless Mesh Enables Alternative Broadband Access

Omni Antenna vs. Directional Antenna

Wireless SDSL for the Business Sector

High speed Internet in sparsely populated areas

Interpreting the Information Element C/I

Cooperative Techniques in LTE- Advanced Networks. Md Shamsul Alam

Networking. Introduction. Types of Wireless Networks. A Build-It-Ourselves Guide to Wireless Mesh Networks

The Economics of Gigabit 4G Mobile Backhaul

ROUTER CATALOGUE.

LTE, WLAN, BLUETOOTHB

How To Know If You Are Safe To Use An Antenna (Wired) Or Wireless (Wireless)

Cisco Outdoor Wireless Network Serves Up Automatic Meter Reading

wireless triple play network -

Application Note. Low Bandwidth Media Configuration V7.0

Module 5. Broadcast Communication Networks. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

WIRELESS IN THE METRO PACKET MICROWAVE EXPLAINED

High-Density Wi-Fi. Application Note

FIBRE TO THE BTS IMPROVING NETWORK FLEXIBILITY & ENERGY EFFICIENCY

How To Get High Speed Internet In Australia

Wireless Networks. Reading: Sec5on 2.8. COS 461: Computer Networks Spring Mike Freedman

Understanding Range for RF Devices

The data can be transmitted through a variety of different communications platforms such as:

Wireless Feasibility Survey And Site Survey For Sandersville, GA. Jay Sexton and Jeffrey Lee Georgia Tech Research Institute

Expert Reference Series of White Papers. Wireless Bandwidth Not Necessarily as Advertised COURSES.

1.264 Lecture 36 (Solutions)

Wireless The answer to all our communications needs?

WiFi Antenna Installation Best Practices Design Guide

October Field Area Communication Networks for Digital Oil and Gas Fields

Solving the Wireless Mesh Multi-Hop Dilemma

Wireless Network Standard and Guidelines

Packet Synchronization in Cellular Backhaul Networks By Patrick Diamond, PhD, Semtech Corporation

Satellite Bandwidth 101

Lecture 1. Introduction to Wireless Communications 1

MOTOROLA CANOPY WIRELESS BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS PLATFORM

Narrowband and Broadband Access Technologies

The ACS therefore believes the Federal government should encourage reuse of existing networks as much as possible.

Sharing experiences from small cell backhaul trials. Andy Sutton Principal Network Architect Network Strategy, Architecture & Design 31/01/13

Radio Frequency Operations and Technology

LTE License Assisted Access

Computers Are Your Future Prentice-Hall, Inc.

SkyWay-Mobile. Broadband Wireless Solution

Canopy Wireless Internet Platform Frequently Asked Questions. August,

Chapter 3 Cellular Networks. Wireless Network and Mobile Computing Professor: Dr. Patrick D. Cerna

CHAPTER 1 1 INTRODUCTION

HUAWEI Enterprise AP Series ac Brochure

AirMax4GW 4G LTE + WiFi Outdoor Gateway

Deployment of Multi-layer TDMA Cellular Network with Distributed Coverage for Traffic Capacity Enhancement

General Camera Information and use for NuAire Biological Safety Cabinets (BSC) and Isolators

LTE BACKHAUL REQUIREMENTS: A REALITY CHECK

LTE: Technology and Health. 4G and Mobile Broadband

Whitepaper. Next Generation Gigabit WiFi ac

Mobile Broadband of Deutsche Telekom AG LTE to cover White Spaces. Karl-Heinz Laudan Deutsche Telekom AG 16 June 2011

It all comes back to backhaul

NSN White paper February Nokia Solutions and Networks Smart Scheduler

Wharf T&T Limited Report of Wireless LAN Technology Trial Version: 1.0 Date: 26 Jan Wharf T&T Limited. Version: 1.0 Date: 26 January 2004

Case Study WIRELESS EXCELLENCE. Case Study MobiNil selects CableFree for GSM network expansion. Cellular Wireless Networks. About Wireless Excellence

The Business Case for Service Provider Wi-Fi Addressing the tremendous growth in mobile data traffic in a scalable and cost effective manner

Fixed Wireless Fact Sheet

The main purpose of the study was to answer the three following questions:

networks Live & On-Demand Video Delivery without Interruption Wireless optimization the unsolved mystery WHITE PAPER

METHODS OF GATHERING EGM DATA Stephen Easley TXU Lone Star Pipeline

the amount of data will grow. It is projected by the industry that utilities will go from moving and managing 7 terabytes of data to 800 terabytes.

CS263: Wireless Communications and Sensor Networks

Troubleshooting Slow Internet Common Causes

LTE Evolution for Cellular IoT Ericsson & NSN

Transcription:

Beating Cellular Congestion Smartphone and tablet usage is continuing to rise. More devices are appearing, and more users are utilizing data services via a wealth of applications. In congested areas, such as large sporting events, shows, demonstrations, and other situations with large numbers of people trying to use their gadgets at the same time, mobile bandwidth overload can cause services to break down. Newly introduced LTE networks, which provide tens of megabits of bandwidth in each direction are still limited by the laws of physics, and will not solve congestion, since the content delivery applications are also becoming more and more bandwidth hungry. Cellular network congestion poses a challenge to live mobile uplink devices and technology, under certain circumstances, since live video transmission from overcrowded areas is a typical scenario that may be susceptible to video quality degradation due to cellular overuse. The physical terrain may also impact cellular connectivity, including distance to towers, and barriers between the cellular devices and the towers such as walls, buildings, and more. This paper provides an overview of the cellular congestion phenomena, its nature, behavior and effect on the service, and how the LiveU Xtender and Microwave technologies help to overcome this problem: The LiveU Xtender external antenna, serving as a bonded cellular relay, provides additional uplink bandwidth, and allows connection to remote, uncongested cells The LiveU Xtender external antenna, helping to obtain signal through barriers, such as thick walls inside buildings and other structures, where signal may be too weakend for other cellular devices to obtain. A microwave transmitter allows connection directly to a remote internet access point, or to further remote the Xtender to non-congested cellular clusters

1 Tackling Cellular Networks Overload Mobile operators are currently using several techniques to try and resolve network overload: Adding temporary radio elements such as micro and Femto cells near the congested area, for the duration of the event Diverting traffic to older 2G cellular technologies Offloading to Wi-Fi Applying traffic management techniques that more efficiently shape, throttle and prioritize the service flows according to flow type. Long term: Upgrading the cellular networks to a more advanced generation (LTE, LTE-A) However, just as in dealing with congested roads and highways, even after applying the above congestion avoidance techniques, some extreme scenarios may simply be too overwhelming and much of the congestion still remains. Essentially, there are too many people using too many network-hungry applications in places where the wireless edge of the network does not have capacity or where there are bottlenecks in the base stations or in the backhaul. LiveU Congestion Counter-Measures Given that cellular congestion cannot be completely avoided for the foreseeable future, LiveU has developed a remote Xtender solution combined with microwave technology, which offers an innovative approach that circumvents the overloading condition, by connecting to remote, uncongested cell towers or directly to the public network. LiveU Xtender The LiveU Xtender is a portable external antenna unit that increases network reception and provides additional resiliency for live video transmission in extreme scenarios, such as heavily crowded locations. The Xtender essentially increases the network reception of LiveU s field units. The LiveU Xtender adds enhanced RF antennas and seven additional network connections (six cellular modems and one Wi-Fi) to LiveU s professional-grade devices and covers all current 3G/4G LTE cellular network bands worldwide. The Xtender connects to LiveU s units by using one of the following: LAN (for a direct connection between the LiveU Xtender and the LU device). Wireless connectivity between the LiveU Xtender and LU device LiveU Microwave link LiveU s microwave solution is a rugged, hi-power, very linear 2x2 MIMO microwave radio with enhanced receiver performance. It features excellent range performance (several km/miles) and high speed (>15Mbps). The LiveU microwave link utilizes unlicensed carrier frequency options either 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz. The figures in the next section demonstrate how the Xtender can help to overcome network congestion, and to keep the video uplink path clear and fully serviceable. Contents: Cellular Congestion...2 Xtender With Microwave Link...3 Direct Microwave Link...5 Real World Examples...6

2 Cellular Congestion Scenario Figure 1 illustrates an example of 4 cellular clusters topology cluster a, b, c & d. Each cluster is composed of 7 cells, each cell with S duplex channels (total of 7xS duplex channels per cluster). The figure shows how the same S(i) duplex channels are re-used on each of the four clusters. Now let s locate an LU70 device at cell S3a. This LU70 will be able to connect to cluster a (any of 7 cell towers - S1a to S7a) and transmit live video. If this cluster becomes congested with cellular users, total uplink will rapidly deteriorate, and the resulting service will be poor or even non-existent. Unfortunately, the LU70 will not be permitted to connect to remote clusters (b, c or d), since this would violate channel re-use policy. Cellular Congestion Scenario With LiveU Xtender Let s add a LiveU Xtender adjacent to the LU70, as shown on figure 2. The Xtender will likely alleviate the bandwidth deterioration, since it will add more uplink channels, and will improve the signal quality, and the associated bit rate per channel. However, neither the LU70 nor the Xtender will be permitted to connect to the remote clusters, since this will violate the channel re-use policy. The Xtender will add more uplink bandwidth, but since it is in the same congested cluster, its additional bandwidth gain will be relatively low. See Figure2 Cellular congestion Scenario with Remote LiveU Xtender Let s leave LU70 at S3a cell, but relocate the Xtender to S3b cluster vicinity, as shown in Figure 3. The Xtender will now be able to connect to cluster b (any of 7 cell towers 1b to 7b), which is far from the congested area and thus much less prone to congestion. The Xtender will be connected to the LU70 via a point-to-point microwave link, as depicted by the arrow above. Since the Xtender is using another, non-congested cell cluster, it will provide significantly higher bandwidth than in the previous scenario. The further away the Xtender will be located, the less it will be affected by network congestion experienced in cluster a s vicinity. The effective distance that yields a good bandwidth gain varies and depends on the specific cell topology, local topography, antenna gain, weather and RF obstacles. If the Xtender is located at a distance of 1000 yds (approx 1 km) or more from the congested area, and has Line of Sight to the LU70, in most cases the video bandwidth will be sufficient for HD streaming. S1g S1g S1g S2b S6s S2b S6s S2b S6s S6b S4b S7b S5s S6b S4b S7b S5s S6b S4b S7b S5s S5b S3b S4s S5b S3b S4s S5b S3b S4s S4e S1b S2a S4e S1b S2a S4e S1b S2a S6c S2c S3c S6a S5a S3a S6c S2c S3c S6a S5a S3a S6c S2c S3c S6a S5a S3a S5c S1c S6d S2d S3d S1a S7d S5c S1c S6d S2d S3d S1a S7d S5c S1c S6d S2d S3d S1a S7d Figure 1: Cellular Clusters Figure 2: LU70 + Xtender at cluster a Figure 3: Remote Xtender Topology

3 Effective use of the Xtender with a Microwave link As explained above, we should aim to locate the Xtender as far as possible from the congested network area. When possible, site planning should be done prior to the live event in order to ensure reliable, stable and high quality video streaming throughout the whole event period in the active area. The planner must take into consideration the technical constraints of the wireless link, the local topography, the anticipated congested area boundaries, the desired location of the camera and LiveU unit, country regulations, previous field tests results, and more. A 5 GHz LiveU microwave device, functioning as a base station, is attached to the Xtender, with a 180 degree directional antenna aimed towards the stadium at the center of the antenna radiation lobe. Another 5 GHz device, functioning as a client side, is attached to the LU device, with an Omni antenna (360 degrees). The point-to-point microwave link between the LU and the Xtender is automatically established once the microwave device is powered up and aimed correctly. Wrong alignment of the antenna will yield poor on no reception signal. See Figure 4 The LiveU field device transmission profile should also be optimized for the specific type of the broadcasted event: Longer delay profile will yield better streaming stability, while maintaining high video quality. Long delay profile is an excellent choice for events such as press conferences, court room trial coverage, or a similar events. Lowering the video resolution will further increase the session resiliency and stability, at the expense of the video sharpness, and will allow reasonable quality even when the overall uplink bandwidth is poor. Proper planning, based on all applicable considerations, will yield an optimal and satisfying use of the Xtender. Microwave link with Line Of Sight liveu Xtender liveu LU70 Figure 4: Microwave Link with LoS The camera operator is shooting at a crowded sports stadium. The Xtender is placed either at the top of the stadium, or on a hill nearby, a tall building, or on a tall mast, with line of sight (LoS) to inside the stadium. The recommended distance between the LiveU device and the Xtender is about 1 mile (1.6km).

4 Relay Point Figure 5: Microwave Link without LoS Microwave Link with no Line-of-Sight If the site and surrounding area topology do not allow positioning the Xtender far away enough at line-of-sight, we can use a relay topology, in order to allow smooth streaming under no line-of-sight conditions. For this purpose, we will use an additional pair of LiveU Microwave devices connected back to back (Ethernet to Ethernet), in the following topology: The LiveU device / Camera will move freely in the stadium, transmitting to the Xtender through the relay point. The Relay point will be located at the top of the stadium, with one set of directional antenna aiming towards the stadium area (~180o), and the other set towards the remote Xtender (Directional antenna can be as narrow as 45 o, aiming towards the Xtender). The overall wireless p2p delay, even with two hops, will still be negligible, compared to the overall glass to glass delay. Microwave link with no Line-of-Sight inside a building A similar situation might be encountered when transmitting from a room within a building, such as a court room, where a high-profile trial is being conducted: Live streaming at low delay from this court room can be challenging, since the cellular coverage might be poor or even actively jammed. In such situation, we can apply one of the following topologies: Locate the Xtender at an external window or open space area near the court room, with line-of-sight to the microwave transmitter/liveu device. If a window or open space is too far from the camera location (that is - no good connectivity between the LiveU microwave transmitter and the Xtender microwave receiver), we can locate the relay point at a midpoint between the Xtender and the LiveU device. The mid-point relay will forward the stream to the LiveU server via the Xtender, which is located at a nearby open space location, as depicted in Figure 6 For the inside building wireless p2p segment, a 2.4 Ghz pair will likely work better, since it penetrates solid obstacles more efficiently than 5Ghz as shown in Figure 7. Relay Point Xtender 2.4 Ghz 2.4Ghz 5Ghz 2.4Ghz 5Ghz 5Ghz LU70 Figure 6: Microwave Link Indoors Figure 7: Reciever Frequencies

5 Direct Microwave Link to a Public Network In many cases, a nearby location has access to the public internet. This might be the case when the nearby location is one of the following: Wideband Ethernet connection to the internet either a home router, corporate network, or similar established connection A satellite truck with Ethernet connection and >5Mbps active satellite data channel A Microwave tower that is point-to-point connected to a far away Microwave dish with corporate network or public network connectivity Established fixed receiver hub network for wireless reception in major cities. Such fixed wireless networks can eliminate the need for satellite or cellular based streaming In such cases, the LU device can connect directly, via a pair of microwave devices, to the public network, even without the Xtender, as depicted in Figure 8. Figure 8: Direct Microwave Link

Device Aggregated Bandwidth Kb LU70 Alone 581.1 Kbps 83 LU70 + Xtender 1.3-1.6 Kbps 19 6 Real World Examples At two large events (30,000 and 55,000 people), and once inside a building with poor reception, the LU70 s performance was tested with and without the LiveU Xtender. The outdoor events both took place in crowded stadiums in the center of a large city, where the large number of visitors caused cellular congestion. The tests at these events demonstrated the LiveU advantage: The combined Microwave link & remote Xtender significantly increases streamed bandwidth performance, especially in extremely crowded and congested areas. Sporting Event At a large sporting event, the LiveU LU70 was placed on the ground near the field in the stadium. The LiveU Xtender was positioned on top of the bleachers of the full stadium in a heavily crowded area (See Figure 4). The LiveU Xtender and the LU70 were connected using the wireless connectivity kit to provide aggregated bonded bandwidth. Analysis of internal log files compared the LU70 performance alone versus its performance with a LiveU Xtender proved a significant additional aggregated bandwidth Results are listed in the table (top right). Rihanna Concert At a Rihanna concert in an outdoor venue (55,000 fans), the LiveU LU70 was placed on the ground about 150 yards (137m) from the stage. The uplink bandwidth for the stand-alone LU70 was almost null at the beginning of the concert. The LiveU Xtender was then positioned on top of a hill about 1000 yards (914m) away, with line-of-sight to the LU70 unit. LiveU Signals Xtender Adds from ~132% to Streamed Remote Bandwitdth Ce Device Aggregated bandwidth Kbps per Modem LU 70 Alone 581.1 kbps 83.3 LU70 + Xtender 1.3-1.6 Mbps 193.7 The LiveU Xtender enabled reception from remo that were not accessible by the LU70 on the grou stadium. These remote cell towers were less con those in the area of the stadium, which was situ center and was full of people. The additional mo by the LiveU Xtender and access to these remote added significantly to the streamed bandwidth. Xtender inside a Building The Xtender was tested while trying to transmit from a high-rise building in a large city. The test took place on the 14th floor of the a regional court building. Prior experience at this venue was that cellular signal reception was poor, and in order to get any signal, the LU70 had to be placed near the window. Under such set-up, a typical aggregated bandwidth was 200 to 400 kbps. Using the Xtender from The Xtender was recently tested while trying pines. The test took place on the 14th floor o venue was that cellular signal reception was placed near the window typically, aggregat An Xtender was positioned near the window and was connected wirelessly to an LU70 that had been relocated into an internal office room. The LU70 established a microwave connection to the remote Xtender a few seconds after the Xtender completed its power up boot, and achieved over 1 Mbps stable streaming. While the LU70 operator had no cellular service, and could not even send a single SMS, the LU70 was seamlessly streaming through the remote Xtender with no interruptions. Figure 9: Xtender in a Low Service Area www.liveu.tv/contact_us.html www.f

7 Summary LiveU combined Xtender and microwave technology demonstrated its power and ability to boost the quality and stability of live video transmission from congested or poorly covered locations, without sacrificing the freedom of the camera operator to walk around and capture ongoing events at high resolution and stability. The Xtender s quick set up, and its lightweight packaging, enables the user to easily carry it to the best uplink point and establish live streaming in few minutes. The Xtender will boost video streaming quality and stability in the following typical cases: Poor cellular coverage areas Inside a building, with many RF obstacles and attenuators Remote relay for cellular congested locations/events The Microwave link, along with its optional relay mid-point, enables further service boosting, by: Remote connection to the Xtender from as far as 3 km (about 2mi) Point-to-point direct connectivity with Line Of Sight Point-to-point connectivity through a relay point for Non Line Of Sight situations Connecting to a remote internet access point / Satellite truck Connecting to the internet through an established microwave receivers network