CE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions)



Similar documents
Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II)

When to Use Immediate Settlement in Settle 3D

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

Consolidation and Settlement Analysis

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

VERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOIL TYPES OF LOADING. Point Loads (P) Line Loads (q/unit length) Examples: - Posts. Examples: - Railroad track

13. AN INTRODUCTION TO FOUNDATION ENGINEERING

Secondary Consolidation and the effect of Surcharge Load

PREDICTING THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF MAKASSAR MARINE CLAY USING FIELD PENETRATION TEST (CPTU) RESULTS

Improvement in physical properties for ground treated with rapid impact compaction

Estimation of Compression Properties of Clayey Soils Salt Lake Valley, Utah

FUNDAMENTALS OF CONSOLIDATION

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

CONSOLIDATION

How To Model A Shallow Foundation

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

The foundation of the new sewage plant at le Havre An alternative solution with a preloading embankment

Soil Classification Through Penetration Tests

Ingeniería y Georiesgos Ingeniería Geotécnica Car 19 a Nº of 204 ; TEL : igr@ingeoriesgos.com

Site Investigation. Some unsung heroes of Civil Engineering. buried right under your feet. 4. Need good knowledge of the soil conditions

Numerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil

ESTIMATION OF UNDRAINED SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON LONDON CLAY

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.

Program COLANY Stone Columns Settlement Analysis. User Manual

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT RESPONSE OF RAFT FOUNDATION ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD

A Ground Improvement Update from TerraSystems

Laterally Loaded Piles

NORMALIZATION OF STRESS-STRAIN CURVES FROM CRS CONSOLIDATION TEST AND ITS APPLICATION TO CONSOLIDATION ANALYSIS

Advanced Foundation Engineering SHORT & LONG TERM SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS. S. G. Paikowsky

Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

Figure CPT Equipment

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

CPTic_CSM8. A spreadsheet tool for identifying soil types and layering from CPTU data using the I c method. USER S MANUAL. J. A.

How To Design A Foundation

SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT

DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA

TECHNICAL REPORT ON SCALA DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER IRREGULARITY

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS

CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Figure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate

Tests and Analyses on Shear Strength Increment of Soft Soil under Embankment Fill

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

Strength Determination of "Tooth-Paste" Like Sand and Gravel Washing Fines Using DMT

Soil behaviour type from the CPT: an update

TECHNICAL Summary. TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades February 2003 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, SPR-2362

A case study of large screw pile groups behaviour

PAPAMOA EAST URBAN DEVELOPMENT PART 1 AREA LIQUEFACTION HAZARD REVIEW Technical Report

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Soil Mechanics. Outline. Shear Strength of Soils. Shear Failure Soil Strength. Laboratory Shear Strength Test. Stress Path Pore Pressure Parameters

Toe Bearing Capacity of Piles from Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Data

Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles

Anirudhan I.V. Geotechnical Solutions, Chennai

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

Mechanical Properties of Metals Mechanical Properties refers to the behavior of material when external forces are applied

Equivalent CPT Method for Calculating Shallow Foundation Settlements in the Piedmont Residual Soils Based on the DMT Constrained Modulus Approach.

1. Fluids Mechanics and Fluid Properties. 1.1 Objectives of this section. 1.2 Fluids

Constant Rate of Strain Consolidation with Radial Drainage

Dimensional and Structural Data for Elliptical Pipes. PD 26 rev D 21/09/05

ASSESSMENT OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY FROM INDIRECT INSITU TESTS

CHAPTER 6 SETTLEMENT ANALYSES

Geotechnical Testing Methods II

Benchmarking Multi-Dimensional Large Strain Consolidation Analyses D. Priestley 1, M.D. Fredlund 2 and D. van Zyl 3

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

Washington ,

Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

Measurement of Soil Parameters by Using Penetrometer Needle Apparatus

Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. Tom Lunne Peter K. Robertson John J.M. Powell

Testing and appraisal of Lucobit polymer effect as an additive on asphalt mixture performance

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL TUTORIAL 4 - COMPLEMENTARY SHEAR STRESS

CE 204 FLUID MECHANICS

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

Solid Mechanics. Stress. What you ll learn: Motivation

A Theoretical Solution for Consolidation Rates of Stone Column-Reinforced Foundations Accounting for Smear and Well Resistance Effects

Local buckling of plates made of high strength steel

Embankment Consolidation

EN Eurocode 7. Section 10 Hydraulic Failure Section 11 Overall Stability Section 12 Embankments. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland

Bearing Capacity (Daya Dukung Tanah)

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF PIEZOCONE PENETRATION IN CLAY

COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2

OUTCOME 1 STATIC FLUID SYSTEMS TUTORIAL 1 - HYDROSTATICS

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF AN EARTH DAM FOUNDATION IN TUNISIA

Oasys Ltd. 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ

Applying a circular load. Immediate and consolidation settlement. Deformed contours. Query points and query lines. Graph query.

Fluid Mechanics: Static s Kinematics Dynamics Fluid

Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

APPENDIX G SETTLEMENT

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

Transcription:

CE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions) P. 1) LOAD UNDER A RECTANGULAR AREA (1) Question: The footing shown in the figure below exerts a uniform pressure of 300 kn/m 2 to the soil. Determine vertical stress increase due to uniform pressure, at a point of 4 m directly under; (a) point A, (b) point B. B A Solution: a) Point A; L Shaped Footing (Plan view) a b 1 c d 4 m 2 g f e z = q.i r By the use of Figure 1.6 in Lecture Notes, page 10; 1

For area 1 : A(abcfg) z = 4 m mz = 4 m = 4/4 = 1 I r = 0.12 nz = 2 n = 2/4 = 0.5 For area 2 : A(cdef) z = 4 m mz = = 2/4 = 0.5 I r = 0.085 nz = 2 n = 2/4 = 0.5 z = 300 (0.12 + 0.085) = 61.5 kpa the stress at 4 m depth under point A due to 300 kn/m 2 uniform pressure b) Point B; 1 B 2 3 Area 1 = Area 2 = Area 3 mz = nz = = n = 2/4 = 0.5 I r = 0.085 z = 300 (3 x 0.085) = 76.5 kpa the additional stress at 4 m depth under point B due to 300 kpa uniform pressure 2

P. 2) LOAD UNDER A RECTANGULAR AREA (2) Question: A rectangular footing as shown in figure below exerts a uniform pressure of 420 kn/m 2. Determine the vertical stress due to uniform pressure at point A for a depth of 3 m. 6 m A uniform pressure of 420 kn/m 2 5 m A Composite footing Solution: a 1.5 m Plan View b i j c 1.5 m h g m f k d e For area (abkh) : z = 3 m mz = 4 m = 4 / 3 = 1.33 I r = 0.195 nz = 3.5 n = 3.5 / 3 = 1.17 For area (bcdk) : mz = 3.5 m = 3.5 / 3 = 1.17 I r = 0.151 nz = 2 n = 2 / 3 = 0.67 For area (defk) : mz = = 2 / 3 = 0.67 I r = 0.105 nz = 1.5 n = 1.5 / 3 = 0.5 3

For area (fghk) : mz = 4 m = 4 / 3 = 1.33 I r = 0.133 nz = 1.5 n = 1.5 / 3 = 0.5 For area (ijkm) : mz = nz = = n = 2 / 3 = 0.67 I r = 0.117 z = I r = 420 [ I r 1 + I r 2 + I r 3 + I r 4 - I r 5 ] = 420 [ 0.195 + 0.151 + 0.105 + 0.133 0.117 ] z = 196.14 kpa Note: Where do we use the vertical stress increase, z, values? For example, in a consolidation settlement problem, stress increase, z, values are needed to calculate settlement under a foundation loading. We make the following calculations for a point located under the foundation at a certain depth (for example, at the mid-depth of the compressible layer): (1) First, calculate the initial effective vertical stress, v,o, before the building was constructed, (2) Then, find the vertical stress increase z at that depth, by using Boussinesq stress distribution or by approximate methods (for example 2V: 1H approximation) (3) Find the final effective vertical stress, v,f = v,o + z, after the building is constructed. (4) Use these values in calculating the settlement under the foundation. 4

P. 3) IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT Question: A foundation 4 m, carrying a net uniform pressure of 200 kn/m 2, is located at a depth of 1.5 m in a layer of clay 5 m thick for which the value of E u is 45 MN/m 2. The layer is underlain by a second layer, 10 m thick, for which the value of E u is 80 MN/m 2. A hard stratum lies below the second layer. Ground water table is at the depth of foundation. Determine the average immediate settlement under the foundation. Hint: Since soil is SATURATED CLAY, =0.5. So the following equation can be used: q B Si 0 1 E u Solution: q = 200 kn/m 2 1.5 m E u = 45 MN/m 2 3.5 m E u = 80 MN/m 2 10 m Hard stratum q B Si 0 1 E u 5

D H B q Hard stratum B is the smaller dimension! We obtain, 0 from D / B 1 from H / B and L / B D / B = 1.5 / 2 = 0.75 0 = 0.95 (Figure 3.3, p.62 Lecture Notes) (1) Consider the upper layer with E u = 45 MPa. D H = 3.5 m Hard stratum E u = 45 MPa H / B = 3.5 / 2 = 1.75 1 = 0.65 L / B = 4 / 2 = 2 q B (200) 2 S (0.95) (0.65) 5. mm i E 45 49 1 0 1 u (2) Consider the two layers combined with E u = 80 MPa. D H = 13.5 m E u = 80 MPa H / B = (3.5 + 10) / 2 = 6.75 1 = 0.9 L / B = 4 / 2 = 2 q B (200) 2 S (0.95) (0.9) 4. mm i E 80 28 2 0 1 u Hard stratum (3) Consider the upper layer with E u = 80 MPa. D H = 3.5 m Hard stratum E u = 80 MPa H / B = 3.5 / 2 = 1.75 1 = 0.65 L / B = 4 / 2 = 2 q B (200) 2 S (0.95) (0.65) 3. mm i E 80 08 3 0 1 u 6

Using the principle of superposition, the settlement of the foundation is given by; S i = S i 1 + S i 2 - S i 3 S i = 5.49 + 4.28 3.08 S i = 6.69 mm P. 4) SCHMERTMAN Question: A soil profile consists of deep, loose to medium dense sand ( dry = 16 kn/m 3, sat = 18 kn/m 3 ). The ground water level is at 4 m depth. A 3.5 m x 3.5 m square footing rests at 3 m depth. The total (gross) load acting at the foundation level (footing weight + column load + weight of soil or footing) is 2000 kn. Estimate the elastic settlement of the footing 6 years after the construction using influence factor method (Schmertman, 1978). End resistance values obtained from static cone penetration tests are; Depth (m) q c (kn/m 2 ) 0.00 2.00 8000 2.00-4.75 10000 4.75-6.50 8000 6.50 12.00 12000 12.00 15.00 10000 Note that; for square footing; z (depth)(from foundation level) I z (strain factors) 0 0.1 B/2 0.5 2B 0.0 Where; B : width of footing E s = 2.0 q c 7

Solution: S i = C 1 C 2 q net E I z z q net = net foundation pressure ' C 1 0.5 o correction factor for footing depth 1 q net ' o = effective overburden pressure at foundation level C 2 t 1 0.2 log correction factor for creep 0.1 t = time at which the settlement is required (in years) q gross = 2000 kn 4m 3m dry = 16 kn/m 3 deep loose to medium dense sand sat = 18 kn/m 3 2000 qnet 3x16 115. 26 kpa 3.5x3.5 gross pressure. initial effective overburden pressure o = 3x16 = 48 kpa C 1 C 2 1 1 48 0.5 115.26 6 0.2 log 0.1 0.792 1.356 8

ground surface q c (kn/m 2 ) 0.0 m 8000 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 I z 10000 4 Layer 1 z 1 1 0.5B = 1.75m 4.75 2 8000 Layer 2 z 2 6 3 6.5 Layer 3 z 3 4 8 5 enter from mid-height of each layer 12000 Layer 4 z 4 10 7 6 2B=2x3.5 = 7m 12 Width of foundation, B = 3.5 m 14 10000 15 E s = 2.0 q c Layer No Depth(m) z(m) q c (kpa) Es(kPa) I z (I z /E s ) z 1 3.00-4.75 1.75 10.000 20.000 0.3 2.65x10-5 2 4.75-6.50 1.75 8.000 16.000 0.416 4.55x10-5 3 6.50-8.25 1.75 12.000 24.000 0.249 1.82x10-5 4 8.25-10.00 1.75 12.000 24.000 0.083 0.605x10-5 x S i = (0.792) (1.356) (115.26) (9.625x10-5 ) = 0.01191 m S i = 11.91 mm 9

P5. CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT Question: Ignore the immediate settlement, and calculate total consolidation settlement of soil profile composed of two different types of clay, i.e. Clay 1 and Clay 2 due to 150 kpa net foundation loading. Take unit weight of water as 10 kn/m 3 and assume that Skempton- Bjerrum Correction Factor is 0.7 for both clay layers. Note that σ c (or sometimes shown as σ p) is the preconsolidation pressure. 10 m x 10 m CLAY 1 q net = 150 kpa z CLAY 1 6 m γ dry = 19 kn/m 3 γ sat = 20 kn/m 3 C r = 0.05; C c = 0.15 e o = 0.80; σ c = 80 kpa CLAY 2 6 m γ sat = 20 kn/m 3 C r = 0.03; C c = 0.10 e o = 0.60; σ c = 200 kpa INCOMPRESSIBLE Solution: Settlement will take place due to loading (q net = 150 kpa) applied at a depth of. Thus, all (consolidation) settlement calculations will be performed for clayey soil beneath the foundation (z > ). Reminder: General equation of 1D consolidation settlement (one dimensional vertical consolidation) for an overconsolidated clay is;, log log, 1 1, 10

Note that, all calculations are done for the mid-depth of the compressible layers under the loading. Consolidation settlement in Clay 1: Initial effective overburden stress, σ v,o = (2*19) + (3*(20-10)) = 68 kpa Stress increment due to foundation loading, Δσ= [150*(10*10)] / [(10+3)*(10+3)] = 88.8 kpa Final stress, σ v,f = 68 + 88.8 = 156.8 kpa This is an overconsolidated clay (overconsolidation ratio OCR = σ c / σ v,o = 80 / 68 > 1.0) ; and the final stress, σ v,f is greater than σ c ( σ v,f > σ c ) therefore we should use both C r and C c in consolidation settlement calculation (see figure below). e (void ratio) Recompression curve: C r = e / log 1 2 Compression curve (virgin line): C c = e / log σ c = 80 kpa log σ σ v,0 = 68 kpa σ v,f = 156.8 kpa 0.05, 1 0.80 6 log 80 68 0.15 1 0.80 6 log 156.8 0.158 15.8 80 1 2 Consolidation settlement in Clay 2: Initial effective overburden stress, σ v,0 = (2*19) + (6*(20-10)) + (3*(20-10)) = 128 kpa Stress increment due to foundation loading, Δσ= [150*(10*10)] / [(10+9)*(10+9)] = 41.6 kpa 11

Final stress, σ v,f = 128 + 41.6 = 169.6 kpa This is an overconsolidated clay (overconsolidation ratio OCR = σ c / σ v,o = 200 / 128 > 1.0) ; and the final stress, σ v,f is less than σ c ( σ v,f < σ c ) therefore we should use only C r in consolidation settlement calculation (see figure below). [Note: If a soil would be a normally consolidated clay (OCR = σ c / σ v,o = 1.0), we would use only C c in consolidation settlement calculation.] e (void ratio) Recompression curve 1 Compression curve (virgin Line) σ c = 200 kpa log σ σ v,0 = 128 kpa σ v,f = 169.6 kpa 0.03, 6 log 169.6 0.014 1.4 1 0.60 128 1 Total Consolidation Settlement (1D):, 15.9 1.4 17.3 Corrected Settlement for 3D Consolidation (Skempton-Bjerrum Factor):,, 17.3 0.7. 12