ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT PLAN



Similar documents
Civil & Environmental Engineering Programs Assessment Process Summary

BSEE-EE Electrical Engineering Assessment Plan

COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLAN

Assessment Plans. for. Computer Engineering Programs

DEPARTMENTAL PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Baccalaureate Study in Engineering Goals and Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes

Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering (BSCoE) Essential Ideas

ERAU Aerospace Engineering Program Educational Objectives and Student Outcomes

(Your name and Date) Assessment Questionnaire For the ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM (02/01/2012)

STUDENT OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN. Mechanical Engineering Program

Unit Plan for Assessing and Improving Student Learning in Degree Programs

OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mechanical Engineering Program Assessment October 16, 2008 INTRODUCTION PROGRAM MISSION STATEMENT

Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering Continuous Improvement Guide

University of Nevada, Reno, Mechanical Engineering Department ABET Program Outcome and Assessment

ABET Criterion 3: Outcomes Met By Course Content

Assessment Processes. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Fall 2014

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLAN

Mechanical Engineering Technology Assessment Report

Assessment Progress Report. Assessment of UALR Core Competencies in the Systems Engineering Department

Plan of Improvement and Assessment for Undergraduate Engineering Programs (PIA)

California State Polytechnic University. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ASSESSMENT PLAN. Spring,

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Program (CpE) Assessment report

Computer Engineering (COE) PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES (10/19/09) Students completing the Computer Engineering program should be able to demonstrate:

Copyright 2014 by ABET. Proposed revisions to ABET Criterion 3 (Student outcomes [a-k]) and Criterion 5 (Curriculum)

Preparing for an ABET Accreditation Visit: Writing the Self-Study

Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle

ABET Accreditation. Michael K. J. Milligan, PhD, PE, CAE. Executive Director Chief Executive Officer April Copyright 2015 by ABET

Assessment Plan and Program Educational Objectives. Computer Engineering Program. Electrical Engineering Program

Boise State University Department of Construction Management Quality Assessment Report and Action Plan

Resolving ABET/TAC Criteria on Continuous Improvement: Surviving ABET Accreditation!

ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (M.S.T.) DEGREE OCTOBER 2012

Department of Engineering Technology Assessment Progress Report Calendar Year 2011 (prepared March 2012)

Assessment of Educational Objectives in Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Programs

Design, conduct experiments, analyze, data, implementation strategies, recommendations findings communicated; (labs)

A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH FOR DEFINING AND ASSESSING PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES

CBU - Construction Management Continuous Quality Improvement Process (CQIP)

Electrical Engineering Technology(BS) and Computer Engineering Technology Assessment Plan

Preparing the Self-Study Report for Engineering

BSEVE-ENVE Environmental Engineering Assessment Plan Approved May, 2013

Development and application of a rubric specific for the senior-year Graduation Design Projects for assessing learning outcomes

ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT/ BAGHDAD UNIVERSITY

ABET Outcomes Assessment

Proposed Change to ABET Software Engineering Program Criteria CSAB Criteria Committee, 1 March 2014

Electronic Engineering Technology Program Exit Examination as an ABET and Self-Assessment Tool

ABET TAC CIP Report for the Academic Year Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) Program

Lander University MSN Assessment Plan

College of Engineering and Petroleum Online Course Assessment

Mechanical Engineering Program Annual Program Improvement Report

Annual Assessment Impact Report. College of Engineering and Applied Sciences

New Mexico State University Mechanical Engineering Interim Report. Prepared for The Engineering Accreditation Commission Of ABET, Inc.

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

EC2000 CRITERION 2: A PROCEDURE FOR CREATING, ASSESSING, AND DOCUMENTING PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

The mission of the School of Electronic and Computing Systems 3 is to provide:

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

Drafting Program Educational Objectives for Undergraduate Engineering Degree Programs

AC : ACCREDITATION OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

ABET Preparation Workshop

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

The Department of Bioengineering

ABET 415 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD Phone: Fax: Website:

Learning Outcomes Assessment for Building Construction Management

PROGRAM PUBLIC INFORMATION

Developing a Sustainable Assessment Plan for EAC-ABET Accreditation

Sarah A. Rajala Ernest W. & Mary Ann Deavenport, Jr. Chair and Dean Bagley College of Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS

Master of Science in Engineering - Electrical Engineering Option (MSE-EE) Student Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP)

DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTANCY ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (M.S.T.) DEGREE

Council for Higher Education Accreditation CHEA Award for Institutional Progress in Student Learning Outcomes

WASHBURN UNIVERSITY DUAL DEGREE PROGRAM School of Law (J.D.) & School of Business (M.B.A.)

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

Student Learning Outcomes Check Sheet. Responsible Program Coordinator/Chair completing this form: Brent Donham

MBA ASSESSMENT PLAN San Diego State University College of Business Administration

Electrical and Computer Engineering Undergraduate Advising Manual

Program Assessment Plan for Engineering Management

Annual Assessment Report Mechanical Engineering University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING APPLIED SCIENCE PROGRAMS

DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND PHYSICS EGR201 Professionalism and Ethics Course Outline Spring 2010

Transcription:

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Mission Statement: The mission of the Electrical Engineering Department is to provide a quality electrical engineering education with extensive hands-on and laboratory experience that will enable our graduates to practice their profession with proficiency and integrity. The educational goals are to graduate engineers who: 1. have the laboratory skills and the ability to use modern analysis and design techniques and state-of-the-art equipment to solve practical engineering problems. The expected student learning outcomes of this goal are to graduate engineers who have: a) the ability to apply science, engineering science, and mathematics to solve engineering problems. b) the ability to put their engineering and design skills into practice. c) the ability to use industrial-quality laboratory equipment and engineering software for analysis, testing, design, and communication. d) the ability to design systems, components, and processes that satisfy predetermined constraints. e) the ability to put engineering problems, put them in solvable form, and develop and evaluate alternative solutions. 2. have the professional skills to function effectively in the work environment as well as in the community. The expected student learning outcomes of this goal are to graduate engineers who have: f) the ability to communicate their ideas and designs clearly orally, in written form, and graphically. g) the ability to work as members of a team. h) had the opportunity to develop leadership skills. 3. have a solid understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. The expected student learning outcomes of this goal is to graduate engineers who: i) understand ethical principles and their role in the engineering profession. 4. have a broad education in order to understand contemporary issues and the impacts of technology on society and the environment. The expected student learning outcomes of this goal are to graduate engineers who: j) have sufficient knowledge of the humanities and social sciences to understand contemporary issues concerning the interaction between technology and society. k) understand that the products they develop and the methods used to manufacture them can affect the environment. 5. have the ability to engage in life-long learning and recognize its importance. The expected student learning outcomes of this goal are to graduate engineers who: l) realize that the practice of electrical engineering is constantly evolving and that engineers must have the ability to acquire new knowledge and skills on their own. m) have the ability to earn graduate degrees or pursue other continuing education opportunities. B3. PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND ASSESSMENT

This section provides summary plus detailed description of the program outcomes, assessment process, a discussion of documented results, and the procedure by which the results are applied to the further improvement of the educational objectives and program outcomes. The complete assessment plan and process can be found in the Materials available for review. B3.1 Program Outcomes The five broad EE Program Educational Goals (Objectives) are listed in section B2 of this report. These golas and the program outcomes correspond to each goal are listed below. The Educational Goals of the Electrical Engineering Program are to graduate engineers who: 1. have the ability to use modern analysis and design techniques and have the laboratory skills to use state-of-theart equipment to solve practical engineering problems. The specific outcomes expected under this goal are to graduate engineers who have: a) the ability to apply science, engineering science, and mathematics to solve engineering problems. b) the ability to put their engineering and design skills into practice. c) the ability to use industrial-quality laboratory equipment and engineering software for analysis, testing, design, and communication. d) the ability to design systems, components, and processes that satisfy predetermined constraints. e) the ability to recognize engineering problems, put them in solvable form, and develop and evaluate alternative solutions. 2. have the professional skills to function effectively in the work environment as well as in the community. The specific outcomes expected under this goal are to graduate engineers who have: f) the ability to communicate their ideas and designs clearly orally, in written form, and graphically. g) the ability to work as members of a team. h) had the opportunity to develop leadership skills. 3. have a solid understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. The specific outcome expected under this goal is to graduate engineers who: i) understand ethical principles and their role in the engineering profession. 4. have a broad education in order to understand contemporary issues and the impacts of technology on society and the environment. The specific outcomes expected under this goal are to graduate engineers who: j) have sufficient knowledge of the humanities and social sciences to understand contemporary issues concerning the interaction between technology and society. k) understand the effects that the products they develop will have on the environment. 5. have the ability to engage in life-long learning and recognize its importance. The specific outcomes expected under this goal are to graduate engineers who: l) realize that the practice of electrical engineering is constantly evolving and that engineers must continuously acquire new knowledge and skills. m) have the learning skills necessary to understand new developments in electrical engineering and to acquire new engineering knowledge and skills on their own. n) have the ability to earn graduate degrees or pursue professional studies. The relationship between the Electrical Engineering Program Outcomes and ABET Outcome requirements of Criterion 3 is shown in Table B3.1. Both EE Program Outcomes and ABET Criterion 3 outcomes are also listed for easy reference. The table clearly indicates that each ABET Criterion 3 outcome is strongly and/or moderately related to several EE Program Outcomes.

Therefore, in this self study, primarily the assessment of EE Program Outcomes are being presented and, when appropriate, the corresponding ABET criteria 3 outcomes are pointed out. It is clear that if the EE Program Outcomes (a-n) are all satisfied, ABET outcomes (a-k) are also satisfied. Table B3.1: Relationship of EE Program Outcomes to ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes Electrical Engineering Program Outcomes ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes a b c d e f g h i j k l m n a 2 1 1 1 1 1 b 1 2 2 1 1 1 c 1 2 2 2 2 1 d 1 1 2 2 e 1 1 2 f 2 1 2 1 1 g 1 2 1 2 h 2 2 2 i 1 1 2 2 2 j 2 1 1 k 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 = Strongly related 1 = Moderately related = Little or no relation

Table B3.2: ABET Outcomes and EE Program Outcomes are tabulated here for easy reference. ABET Program Outcomes a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, a well as analyze and interpret data c) an ability to design a system, component, or a process to meet desired needs d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g) an ability to communicate effectively h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j) a knowledge of contemporary issues k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice EE Program Outcomes a) the ability to apply science, engineering science, and mathematics to solve engineering problems b) the ability to put their engineering and design skills into practice c) the ability to use industrial-quality laboratory equipment and engineering software for analysis, testing, design, and communication d) the ability to design systems, components, and processes that satisfy predetermined constraints e) the ability to recognize engineering problems, put them in solvable form, and develop and evaluate alternative solutions f) the ability to communicate their ideas and designs clearly orally, in written form, and graphically g) the ability to work as members of a team h) had the opportunity to develop leadership skills i) understand ethical principles and their role in the engineering profession j) have sufficient knowledge of the humanities and social sciences to understand contemporary issues concerning the interaction between technology and society k) understand the effects that the products they develop will have on the environment l) realize that the practice of electrical engineering is constantly evolving and that engineers must continuously acquire new knowledge and skills m) have the learning skills necessary to understand new developments in electrical engineering and to acquire new engineering knowledge and skills on their own n) have the ability to earn graduate degrees or pursue professional studies In order to make sure that program educational objectives and outcomes are appropriately addressed in the curriculum, the faculty have developed a set of expected learning outcomes for each electrical engineering course. As shown in course syllabi in Appendix I.B, these expected learning outcomes correspond to certain program educational objectives and outcomes. These relationships are being summarized in Tables B3.2 and B3.3 of this self study. The course portfolios documenting student work in relation to the program objectives and outcomes will be in the Materials available for review. Table B3.3: Relationship of Program Objectives to EE Course Objectives

Electrical Engineering Program Objectives: To graduate engineers who: 1. have the ability to use modern analysis and design techniques and have the laboratory 2. have the professional skills to function effectively in the work environment as well as in the community. 3. have a solid understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 4. have a broad education in order to understand contemporary issues and the impacts of technology on society and the environment. 5. have the ability to engage in life-long learning and recognize its importance. EE Courses EE121 1 2 3 4 5 EE221 EE222 EE302 EE313 EE314 EE331 EE341 EE361 EE375 EE376 EE401 EE402 EE405 EE431 EE432 EE435 EE443 EE445 EE462 EE463 EE472 EE475

Table B3.4: Relationship of Program Outcomes to EE Course Content EE Program Outcomes EE Cours es EE121 EE221 EE222 EE302 EE313 EE314 EE331 EE341 EE361 EE375 EE376 EE401 EE402 EE405 EE431 EE432 EE435 EE443 EE445 EE462 EE463 EE472 EE475 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n B3.2 Assessment Plan

Prior to 1998, the EE program did not have a formal assessment plan. However, the program was using graduating senior exit surveys, coo-op surveys, and input from the Industrial Advisory Board to receive some feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of the program. In Fall 1998, the ABET Committee was formed and has been charged with the development of an assessment plan including assessment tools. The preliminary plan was presented to the EE faculty in December 1998. The ABET Committee conducted surveys and summarized the results of the individual surveys to the faculty at the end of Spring 1999. In the Fall 1999, the department s Assessment Committee was formed to summarize the overall assessment results and make recommendations to the faculty. After the experience with the initial assessment, the Assessment Committee revised the assessment plan and developed a final assessment plan which was adopted by faculty in October 1999. The details of the plan is in the Materials Available for Review. The current Outcome Assessment Plan is based on seven assessment measures. Each assessment tool is developed to receive feedback from respective constituencies on certain program outcomes. The relationship between the assessment tools and the EE program outcomes is shown in Table B3.4. A checkmark indicates a direct relationship of a measurement tool and corresponding program outcome. Table B3.5: Assessment Tools and Their Relationship to EE Program Outcomes Assessment Tools EE Program Outcomes a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Graduating Senior Exit Surveys Alumni Surveys Employer surveys Co-op Supervisor Surveys Course Portfolio/Objective Analysis FE Exam Survey of Potential Employers The results of all these assessment measures are being reviewed and summarized by the Assessment Committee or Curriculum Committee according to the schedule shown in Table B3.5 below. Two key components of the outcome assessment plan are: its continuing nature throughout the academic year, and its aim to provide continuous quality improvements in the program. As a result of the assessment activities, if there are areas that require improvements, the Assessment

Committee makes recommendations to the faculty for approval. Upon approval, the faculty ask the Curriculum Committee to prepare an implementation plan (short term that EE can make modifications alone, or long term if the College or the University level actions are needed) for the recommended change and bring it to the faculty. This process assures the faculty control of the curriculum and also guarantees that the recommendations for improvements are being implemented. Table B3.6: Assessment Activity Schedule Month September October October/April October/ February December/ May December/ May January/ September April Assessment Activity Assessment Committee provides an overall summary of the last year s assessment results, and provide recommendations for improvement to faculty Assessment Committee Reviews the assessment tools and recommends modifications Assessment Committee reviews the results of the last FE exam and issues a report Assessment Committee reviews the Co-op supervisor survey results and issues a report Curriculum Committee reviews the course portfolios and course objective evaluations and issues a report including any recommendations Assessment Committee reviews the results of the potential employer surveys and issues a report Assessment Committee reviews the results of the senior exit surveys and issues a report Assessment Committee reviews the alumni and employer survey results and issues a report