Annual Assessment Report Mechanical Engineering University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science
|
|
- Virginia Norton
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Annual Assessment Report Mechanical Engineering University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM 1. The curriculum goals of the unit, as currently stated in the catalog or other departmental documents, are as follows: Program Goals Undergraduate Program Objective The educational objective of the undergraduate program in Mechanical Engineering is to prepare graduates so that, within three years of graduation, they will have successfully established themselves in professional careers and/or obtained a graduate degree, and will have begun to generate new knowledge or exercise leadership in their positions to the benefit of society. Undergraduate Program Outcomes Each graduate of the mechanical engineering program is expected to: 1. apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; 2. identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; 3. use computers to solve engineering problems; 4. use modern instrumentation; 5. design and conduct experiments, including the use of probability and statistics; 6. analyze and interpret data; 7. design systems, components, or processes to meet desired needs; 8. understand the processes used to manufacture products; 9. understand contemporary issues in mechanical engineering; 10. make effective oral presentations; 11. write effectively; 12. function effectively on multi-disciplinary teams; 13. understand professional and ethical responsibility; 14. understand the impact of engineering in a global and societal context; and 15. engage in lifelong learning. Are these goals still accurate/current or do they need to be revised? What is the unit s schedule for reviewing the curriculum goals? Objectives and Outcomes Updates The above program outcomes are in the process of being updated to reflect recommendations from the most recent ABET review. They will also be updated in the next edition of the course catalog ( ). Specifically, what had been outcomes 7 and 8 will be combined into one more general outcome (#7) that will read design systems, components, or processes to meet desired needs. Page 1 of 16 10/10/2013
2 Although we feel that our curriculum provides a solid grounding in both thermal and mechanical systems, students advanced design experience may emphasize one area to a greater extent than the other contingent on the specifics of their capstone project. As defined in our ABET 2011 self-study report, the basic process for evaluation of the program objectives and outcomes is that they are periodically reviewed by each of the department s constituent groups, with results synthesized into final form by the faculty. Relevant constituent groups for this purpose include students, alumni, employers and the Department s Industry Advisory Council. Since the program objectives and outcomes represent the basic direction and goals of the department, which are not subject to rapid change, the period of the objectives review cycle has been chosen to coincide with the ABET accreditation cycle. 2. During the last review period, how has the department/program assessed how well it has accomplished its curriculum goals? Assessment Data Summary The central mechanism for our continuous improvement cycle is an extensive review process, with six required courses coming under task force evaluation each year. These reviews provide a wealth of information for instructor use and occasionally indicate that curricular modifications are needed. They also provide documentation of our processes, including indicating areas where existing documentation is in need of revision. The results are presented in a table below. Three additional data sources that relate directly to the department s objectives and outcomes are the Alumni Survey, the Senior Survey, and the FE Exam. Supplementary information has also been obtained from a number of College and campus surveys, including those focused on orientation, first-year students, post-graduation, internships, and employers. These surveys provide general information on student attitudes and experiences. The ME Undergraduate Committee, and the Assessment and Curriculum Subcommittee in particular, continually reviews data from these assessments and implements changes accordingly. Task Force Review Data Course MCEN 2024 Material Science Summary and Changes Overall, students felt that the topics listed in the learning objectives were covered. However, they did not feel confident in the information that they learned from the course. When they were informed that the covered material forms the foundation for subsequent classes, including component and mechanical design, they indicated that they would appreciate additional review sessions prior to enrolling in future courses. Additional feedback focused on a lack of instructor accessibility during Spring 2010, as well as on frustration with what was perceived as a lack of general dedication to the course. An example was provided of an exam that included five problems taken directly from the homework, which served to decrease students motivation to push themselves to Page 2 of 16 10/10/2013
3 learn additional material. As a counterpoint, the TAs for the course received excellent feedback with regards to their level of preparation and accessibility. Follow-Up: Instructor specific issues will be remedied by a change in teaching assignments. Other issues were likely also related to teaching style, as they tie back to motivation and overall comfort level with regards to the material covered. Overall, students felt that this course was very well taught. Constructive feedback included a request that the instructor post a full version of the class notes online. The instructor for the course indicated that he had intentionally posted partial notes as a means of engaging students and encouraging them to attend class. Although no clear conclusion was reached, the feedback collected will provide options for future instructors to consider in planning their course structure. MCEN 2063 Mechanics of Solids MCEN 3012 Thermodynamics Negative student feedback focused on a lack of preparation by TAs prior to their office hours. Students reported that the TAs frequently had not looked at the week s homework prior to their office hours, which they found frustrating given that the TA position is a paid role within the Department. Task force facilitators noted that this issue is not isolated to MCEN 2063 and that other courses across the department are similarly impacted. An additional student concern related to MCEN 2063 focused on the instructor s method for encouraging student engagement, which involved calling students up to the board to complete a problem if they were disruptive or did not appear to be paying attention. The students in the course indicated that they did not find the strategy effective, which the instructor agreed to take into consideration for future semesters. Follow-Up: Future instructors will have a clear view of the pros and cons of providing students with a complete set of lecture notes, as well as a better understanding of the expectations that should be set for TAs. The instructor from this semester also has feedback to take into consideration for future courses with regards to the perceived/actual efficacy of various strategies for promoting student engagement. Students expressed an interest in supplementing a traditional lecture format with additional demos and field trips. Recommendations included lab and industry visits, with a specific request for a power plant tour. An additional topic of review focused on whether the course should include one or two lectures focused on energy, with the understanding that the instructor s relative emphasis on that area may vary between semesters. If it is covered during a specific semester, the task force Page 3 of 16 10/10/2013
4 recommended including a related FCQ question so that the outcome could be more effectively evaluated. Reviewers noted that the current semester s FCQ ratings related to contemporary issues were quite high and that future instructors might benefit from the current instructor s insights in that area. Follow-Up: Student interest in demos and tours will be referred to future instructors for them to follow-up with as they choose. Refer future instructors to Professor Norris for insights on covering material related to contemporary issues. Feedback focused on a lack of adequate time to complete the assigned projects, as well as a preference for longer class sessions and a reformatting of the time frame associated with project completion. Students noted that they felt rushed to complete their projects, even though the instructor had already extended their due date. Students also noted that they frequently ran out of time to work on in-class projects, with the transmission lab mentioned as a specific example. When asked to suggest strategies for reformatting the course to allow more time for projects, students indicated that some of the introductory material on solid mechanics could be eliminated from the course and that evening exams would give them both more test time and more class time. MCEN 3025 Component Design Additional recommendations included recruiting upper division students to serve as design team coaches, bringing in an industry speaker to talk about the importance of component selection, and introducing computer simulations as a course component. There was some discussion about whether it would be helpful for the department to provide budgets for projects, although it was also argued that the majority of the required supplies could be obtained through Durning or the ITLL. On a broader curriculum related note, the students in this course put substantial emphasis on the difficulty associated with balancing all of their junior year coursework. The Undergraduate Committee is aware of that concern and is actively seeking out strategies to better distribute the more work intensive courses in our curriculum throughout students sophomore, junior, and senior years. MCEN 3030 Computational Methods Follow-Up: Lecture moved from MWF to TuTh schedule, with the lab time remaining on Fridays. Positive feedback was provided with regards to instructor accessibility, the decision to locate office hours in the computer lab, and the quality of a guest lecture presented by Professor Desjardins. Students also specifically noted that they appreciated a climate model that was used in class to illustrate the impact of round off error. Page 4 of 16 10/10/2013
5 There were mixed feelings about the effectiveness of the course s TAs, with students noting that the TAs often got stuck helping students who only had a few lines of code to write. No definite conclusions were reached as to strategies for addressing that issue. Specific suggestions related to course material and delivery included making the online MATLAB tutorials a required course component, focusing the homework on more simplified fundamental concepts, including pseudo code on exams, emphasizing MATLAB s built in functions for lab assignments, and moving the exams to an evening format. There was also some concern that reading quizzes may have been more difficult than the instructor had originally anticipated and that the course textbook might not be the best choice to cover all of the class s learning objectives (e.g., partial differential equations). Follow-Up: Instructor worked with students to obtain additional feedback regarding strategies for increasing TAs effectiveness in providing assistance during office hours. Students indicated that the primary benefit of this course is the selfdesigned aspect, which was only an emphasis for one out of the three included lab experiences. Suggested reformatting one of the other two to also emphasize the design component. Also discussed renaming course something similar to Introduction to Research, in order to more effectively describe the actual material covered. Task force indicated that a name change would also need to be accompanied by an increase in the time allotted to experimental design concepts. MCEN 4047 ME Senior Lab A substantial amount of time was devoted to discussing the specifics associated with students poster presentations. Students noted that they appreciated that they were provided with funding resources to help cover the costs of their experiments, but indicated that they would have appreciated also receiving some funding to cover printing costs. A recommendation was made with regards to using projectors to display the posters, with a counterargument suggesting that projected images wouldn t have a high enough resolution to effectively showcase the students work. Some suggestions were noted with regards to course organization, as well as with the organization related skills taught by the course. It was recommended that additional TAs be recruited from the undergraduate student population, so that office hours could be offered prior to each homework due date. In addition, students would have appreciated more information and a better structuring of information on the CU Learn website. The task force s review also indicated that a classroom was only needed for the first week of the course, which made it inefficient to reserve a room for the full semester. Page 5 of 16 10/10/2013
6 ECEN 3010 Circuits Follow-Up: Course moved to lab setting, with a separate lecture space reserved for the first week. Student poster printing is now paid for from student fees budget. Additionally, the ITL now has a high-definition projector in the break-out rooms. Experimentation with projection-only presentations is underway. Course appears to have done a good job of covering key concepts, although there were some areas for potential improvement related to troubleshooting skills and complex numbers. The task force in collaboration with the instructor - recommended using a black box experiment to address the troubleshooting issue and posting calculator instruction links on CU Learn to account for the deficit related to complex numbers. It was also noted that the lab sections could benefit from additional TA support, with the goal of having two full TAs per section. Follow-Up: Instructor continues to request additional TA support from EE department with varying results (some semesters with great support, some with less). We will continue to try to request consistent strong support. The need for every semester offering will increase as enrollments rise. The task force noted substantial concerns related to the size of this course, with issues related to both Matlab license availability and seating challenges. Pros and cons associated with the 8am lecture time were also discussed, particularly with regards to its impact on attendance and the difficulties associated with requesting a move to a different time. GEEN 1300 Introduction to Engineering Computing Students recommended included topical titles on PowerPoint slides, in addition to slide titles. They also requested that labs be formatted in a way that allowed the students to complete them even if one concept is missing, which led to a task force recommendation that additional support be provided in the form of homework or pre-labs. It was also noted that TAs found it difficult to support the lab sections, since it was not possible for them to be familiar with each individual project. Learning objectives and course catalog description were in need of revision, although FCQ appeared to be up to date. CMU version of course description still included Calc 3 topics, which are not a current component. Follow-Up: Both lecture and lab enrollment caps have been significantly reduced. Class was relocated from DUAN to MATH, which is a more optimal space. Still scheduled for 8am, likely due to constraints related to room reservations. Learning objectives, catalog description, and CMU course information have been revised. Page 6 of 16 10/10/2013
7 Senior Survey Data Graduating seniors were surveyed with respect to the program outcomes. Completion of the survey is a graduation requirement, which helped the Department achieve a response rate of 68% for December 2010 and 83% for May As in previous years, students rated their abilities in certain areas highly while noting that other areas could potentially benefit from increased attention. A five point scale was used, with the following descriptions provided: 1-not at all, 2- not very, 3-moderately, 4-very, 5-extremely competent. The following abilities were ranked over 4.0: Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 4.33 Ability to function effectively on multi-disciplinary teams 4.31 Ability to engage in life-long learning 4.29 Ability to make effective oral presentations 4.27 Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering 4.11 Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 4.03 Ability to design mechanical systems, components, or processes 4.05 Overall, students rated themselves as moderately competent or better in all program outcomes. Categories that fell between 3.0 and 4.0 included: Ability to write effectively 4.00 Ability to analyze and interpret data 3.90 Understand the processes used to manufacture products 3.85 Ability to use modern instrumentation 3.83 Understanding of engineering in a global and societal context 3.76 Ability to use computers to solve engineering problems 3.68 Ability to design and conduct experiments 3.62 Ability to design thermal systems, components, or processes 3.28 Understand contemporary issues in mechanical engineering 3.26 The lowest rated outcome was understanding contemporary issues in mechanical engineering, which received a Professors have been emphasizing this more over the past few years, but students don t seem to understand that the topics that are introduced at the beginning of lecture are contemporary issues. We will work to make this connection more obvious. The survey also encouraged students to comment on a wide range of topics related to their time at CU. When asked to describe both the highlights and worst experiences, students often cited individual faculty members. Generally the students listed instructional faculty (non-tenure track) as the highlights of their program, along with the departmental staff advisor. In general, our graduating seniors are well satisfied with our program. In response to the question overall, did your program of study at CU-Boulder meet your educational goals, fully 96% responded yes. Of the total respondents, 94% would recommend the ME program to a friend. FE Exam Data The FE exam (taken by graduating seniors) shows our students continuing to perform at levels Page 7 of 16 10/10/2013
8 slightly below the national average, with an overall pass rate of 74.2% for April Over the years of increasing class sizes, performance on the FE dropped, but rebounded slightly in AY 09-10, possibly due to the enrollment restrictions implemented in Strategies implemented on the Department level to improve FE scores include offering optional review sessions focused on key subject areas and encouraging students to make use of study materials provided by NCEES. It is also worth noting that the Department requires that students register for the FE in order to graduate, but does not require that they pass the test. Given the timing of the exam in relation to graduation, that technicality may lead to decreased motivation to effectively prepare for the exam. Because students must take the exam, however, we hope they will direct some attention to preparation. It is also worth noting that our curriculum does not include Engineering Economics, a required section on the FE exam. Not surprisingly, our students fall below the national average in this area. Testing Date Apr 08 Oct 08 Apr 09 Oct 09 Apr 10 Oct 10 Apr 11 % Passing National % Passing CU Boulder Post-Graduation Survey Alumni from the College of Engineering and Applied Science who graduated in May, August or December of 2010 were invited to complete an online survey focused on their current professional activities. Of the 41 ME graduates who responded, 83% had accepted an offer of employment within six months of their graduation. Alumni reported finding their positions through an internship or co-op (18%), job listing (18%), networking with family or friends (18%), and through Career Services (18%). Job satisfaction was high (3.7/5) and most respondents indicated that their position was related to their major (3.7/5). Of the total respondents, 12% were currently attending graduate school and an additional 42% were considering pursuing an advanced degree. Average salaries for students who graduated from the ME Department were higher than the national average ($50,550) and were on par with the average for CU s College of Engineering ($54,149). Survey respondents reported an average salary of $54,507 for all jobs and $54,842 for positions specifically related to engineering. Alumni Survey Data Graduates from the Class of 2008 were surveyed in Summer 2011 with respect to the program objectives. We received a total of 57 responses (including incomplete surveys) from the 158 graduates contacted, for a 36% overall response rate. Of the respondents, 88% had successfully established themselves in a professional career (responding moderate or higher), 88% felt they had exercised leadership, 33% were in progress towards or had obtained a graduate degree, 38% had begun to generate new knowledge, and 81% felt they were benefiting society. This data indicates that our program objectives are being achieved to a significant degree. Suggested changes to the curriculum included more open-ended or project type courses, more MCEN undergraduate community events, and a stronger connection between MCEN curriculum and industry. 3. What has the department/program concluded with respect to the outcomes of its undergraduate curriculum? Page 8 of 16 10/10/2013
9 Conclusions from the Assessment Data In general our program is performing well, particularly in the face of continued high enrollments. An enrollment control strategy was implemented four years ago and class sizes are coming down from a high of 170 to the target size of 110, as the smaller cohorts move through the program. Summary assessment data, such as the senior survey and FE exam, are expected to improve after AY , as the final large cohort graduates. However, the College has mandated an end to enrollment limitations effective in Fall We expect significant and immediate growth in ME enrollment, with cohort sizes surpassing those prior to enrollment limits being enacted. The College has promised significant additional resources to deal with the growth, should it occur as projected. Reported strengths for our program include high job placement rates, ratings consistently above 3.0 in terms of the Department s success in imparting desired program outcomes, and an ongoing emphasis on evaluating and improving the curriculum. In conjunction with the Student Affairs and Professionalism subcommittee, our branch of ASME has also stepped in to address some of the noted shortcomings in terms of community building opportunities and FE preparation. 4. What changes in the curriculum or in major requirements have occurred as a result of your assessment of your undergraduate program? Changes as a Result of the Assessment Process As mentioned in last year s report and in the MCEN 3025 section of our Task Force Review, we have been investigating alleviation plans to reduce the load in the junior year of the standard curriculum. We have decided to move the Dynamics course from the junior year to the sophomore year to create more balance. The course number will change from MCEN 3043 to MCEN In Spring 2012, we will offer both 2043 and 3043 to allow for the transition, and keep both cohorts on track to graduate. As a result of the end of the enrollment limitation policies in CEAS, and in the face of rising MCEN and EVEN enrollments (environmental engineering majors are required to take several core mechanical engineering courses, hence our thermodynamics 1 and 2, fluids and heat transfer courses are large and growing), the College has approved modest increases in instructional support for the department. These are expected to increase as enrollment increases. We are using these resources to split several of our core courses, focusing on the ones where EVEN enrollment is high. In the academic year, we split thermodynamics 1 and 2, fluids and data analysis into two concurrent sections. As we split more courses, we will offer them each semester, fall and spring, rather than concurrent sections in one semester. This will allow more curricular flexibility for our students, and may encourage student participation in study abroad and co-op programs, and internships. Additional changes resulting from our continuous improvement process have been noted above (pgs 2-6), with regards to the scheduling and format for specific courses. Examples include moving MCEN 4047 from a MWF to a TuTh format to better accommodate a lab based course structure, as well as substantially reducing the class sizes for GEEN We have also noted consistent feedback with regards to the impact of TAs on the quality of students learning Page 9 of 16 10/10/2013
10 experience and have endeavored to both hire high quality TAs and provide instructors with the tools necessary to train them effectively. The Undergraduate and Graduate committees will continue to develop programs together to ensure more effective TAs are available. We are continuing our efforts in community building and professionalism, both of which were areas noted in the post-graduation and alumni surveys. The Professionalism Institute is running well and requires students to attend one professionalism seminar each semester. Topics include professional ethics, dealing with cultural differences and diversity, civic engagement, leadership, and innovation. In addition, most of our faculty members have adopted our Common Syllabus for required undergraduate courses. Assessment of these strategies is ongoing. The Common Syllabus and Professionalism Institute have attracted notice from other departments, and are being considered for wider application on campus. 5. Please provide the url where the unit s assessment evidence is posted. The College of Engineering & Applied Science posts assessment evidence at the following url: GRADUATE PROGRAM 1. What are the curriculum goals of the unit for its graduate students? What is the unit s schedule for reviewing the curriculum goals? Goals Mechanical Engineering offers three graduate degrees: master of engineering (ME), Master of Science (MS), and doctor of philosophy (PhD). The curricula have been designed to train students to enter professional practice at a higher level than BS students and/or to progress to higher levels more rapidly after entry at the beginning level. It is also designed to train students to pursue careers in academia or at other research institutions. In general the undergraduate curricula focuses on the fundamentals of mechanics but by nature cannot also explore a specific sub-discipline with much depth. Therefore, the graduate curriculum provides the opportunity to delve deeper into specific sub-disciplines. Thus additional coursework is targeted at giving students proficiency in one of nine major sub-discipline areas: air quality, mechanics of materials, bioengineering, energy and the environment, foundation, materials, microsystems, design, and simulation-based mechanical engineering sciences. Each sub-discipline area requires 30 hrs of coursework for MS and ME degree requirements. Curriculum Goals Review Schedule The faculty in ME reviews the graduate program in their own sub-discipline area once a year at the end of the spring semester and provides updates to the graduate committee. The department s graduate committee uses this information to maintain degree requirements, plan for course scheduling, and to update the graduate program webpage. The graduate committee reviews the CEAS survey data for the previous year to inform planning for the upcoming year. At the beginning of the fall semester the department s graduate Page 10 of 16 10/10/2013
11 committee organizes its yearly strategic plan and at this time the committee also reviews curriculum goals. If any changes need to be addressed the graduate committee makes a recommendation to the department at a department meeting in the fall semester. During the Fall semester the graduate committee reviews applicant and admissions statistics and assesses whether we are meeting the CEAS goals for graduate programs. The graduate committee requests feedback from department s industry advisory committee every semester. The Industry Advisory Committee recommends that the department should more aggressively market its graduate program to industry, particularly its MS program, to provide specialized training, and increase the number of applicants and thus have a larger pool for top quality applicants. 2. During the last review period, how has the department/program assessed how well it has accomplished its curriculum goals? Assessment data collected includes feedback from our Industry Advisory Committee every semester, statistics from our student applicant and admissions pools, and the CEAS survey data from the Declining Admissions Survey and the Enrolled Grad Survey. 3. What has the department/program concluded with respect to the outcomes of its graduate curriculum? The CEAS Declining Admissions Survey was analyzed to improve the graduate student recruitment or graduate programs. The survey showed we could make two main improvements: (1) increase financial support: 61.5%, n=52 (50% of all respondents, n = 50 in 2008; 65.6% of all respondents, n = 64 in 2009; 81% of all respondents, n=68 in 2010); and (2) provide more personal contact: 30.8%, n=52 (48% of all respondents, n = 50 in 2008; 46.9% of all respondents, n = 64 in 2009; 53% of all respondents, n=68 in 2010). On a positive note, although we need to provide more personal contact the percentage has dropped significantly over the past several years. Additionally, this survey showed that we need to improve the information on the web: 23.1% n=12, in 2008 only 16% of respondent suggested we need to improve compared to 26.6% in 2009 and 20.6% in Other interesting observations from this survey were that during the prospective student visits we were meeting or exceeding expectations on lab tours and that visiting with current graduate students during the visits was a plus. This year our best asset was the campus visit. Only 9.6% n= 52 suggested that we need to improve the oncampus visit. Our graduate committee reviews every year the college goals for graduate programs and assesses whether we are meeting these goals. Below is a summary of how we are performing with respect to CEAS goals. Page 11 of 16 10/10/2013
12 Figure 1 shows that our average undergrad GPA for incoming PhD students has remained basically the same, while the GPA for ME students has declined to 2008 levels. Figure 2 shows enrollment for the graduate program. In the last year our enrollment numbers have leveled off. Figure 3 shows that the diversity in our graduate program has remained basically the same. Reviewing the applications for our program shows that our applications increased this year from a total of 242 graduate applications for fall 2009 to 349 for fall The PhD applications increased from 128 for 2009 to 170 for For Fall 2011 we processed a total of 129 PhD applications, essentially returning to 2009 levels MS PhD Figure 1. Average undergraduate GPA for incoming MS/PhD students in Mechanical Engineering for the years Page 12 of 16 10/10/2013
13 BS/MS UG Status BS/MS Grad Status MS PhD Figure 2. Enrolled student population by program and year in Mechanical Engineering. 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% Female Minority InternaFonal 5% 0% Figure 3. Student diversity in Mechanical Engineering for the years Page 13 of 16 10/10/2013
14 Data from the Spring 2011 Enrolled Graduate Student Survey administered by CEAS show that overall the program is meeting student educational goals (n = 45; 40% answered yes, definitely and 51% answered yes, somewhat ). The students were also very satisfied with the university, college, faculty and staff (Figure 5). Student comments from the survey showed that one of the best parts of their experience were the professors and the classes (20 out of 39 respondents). Students were very satisfied with faculty advising (n = 33; average rating of 4.27 on a 1 5 scale with 5 being the highest). Students also indicated that they are really happy with our graduate advisor Sharon Anderson ( She has been amazingly helpful with the adjustment to graduate school as well as figuring out the requirements for the program, and is always available to help ). Although the response rate was low, students indicated that they did have sufficient support in choosing a research advisor (n = 9; 56% indicated that they had sufficient support). This is a significant increase from the previous year s survey (17.6%). Enrolled students also indicated that they believe the size of the department is just right (n = 44; 73% indicated the graduate program was just right in size, 23% felt it was too large and 4% felt it was too small.) Page 14 of 16 10/10/2013
15 ME Students Sa,sfac,on Ra,ng CU CEAS Major Staff Faculty ME Students SaFsfacFon RaFng Figure 5. Satisfaction rating from the 2011 Enrolled Graduate Student Survey for ME students (n ranged from 33 to 47). Page 15 of 16 10/10/2013
16 4. What changes in the curriculum or in major requirements have occurred as a result of your assessment of your graduate program? During the academic year, we reduced the number of credit hours required for our PhD students. Through conversations with faculty there were concerns from some subdisciplines that we were requiring too many hours for PhD students. We decided to allow each sub-discipline area to determine the required number of credit hours. The minimum required by the graduate school is 30. Currently the different disciplines require credit hours. In an effort to improve the quality of our incoming PhD students, we have enhanced our recruiting visit each spring. We have our annual GEARS event which highlights current research activities. We further integrated this annual event into our recruiting visit. 5. Please provide the url where the unit s assessment evidence is posted. Currently we rely on the CEAS s Assessment information, which is posted at Page 16 of 16 10/10/2013
University of Nevada, Reno, Mechanical Engineering Department. 2005 ABET Program Outcome and Assessment
2005 ABET Program Outcome and Assessment 3. Program Outcomes and Assessment Program Outcomes We define our program educational outcomes as statements that describe what students are expected to be able
More informationComputer Engineering Undergraduate Program (CpE) Assessment report
Computer Engineering Undergraduate Program (CpE) Assessment report During the academic year 2009/2010 the CpE program changed the undergraduate program educational objectives based on recommendations from
More informationSTUDENT OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN. Mechanical Engineering Program
STUDENT OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN Mechanical Engineering Program Department of Mechanical Engineering College of Engineering California State University, Fresno April 2008 Student Outcomes Assessment Plan
More informationHealthy People 2020 and Education For Health Successful Practices in Undergraduate Public Health Programs
University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA Undergraduate Degree in Public Health Sciences Bachelor in Science & 4 Plus 1 BS/MPH http://www.umass.edu/sphhs/public_health/academics/undergraduate/index.html
More informationUnit Plan for Assessing and Improving Student Learning in Degree Programs
Unit Plan for Assessing and Improving Student Learning in Degree Programs Unit: Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Unit Head Approval: Prof. R.H. Dodds Date: SECTION 1: PAST ASSESSMENT RESULTS Brief
More informationSCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Baccalaureate Study in Engineering Goals and Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Baccalaureate Study in Engineering Goals and Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes Overall Description of the School of Engineering The School of Engineering offers bachelor s degree
More informationMechanical Engineering Program Annual Program Improvement Report 2014-2015
Mechanical Engineering Program Annual Program Improvement Report 2014-2015 Prepared by Joseph P. Greene, Ph.D. Professor and Department Chair of the Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering and Sustainable
More informationUniversity of Illinois Department of Computer Science Goals, Objectives, and Assessments January 2009
University of Illinois Department of Computer Science Goals, Objectives, and Assessments January 2009 Introduction The University of Illinois Computer Science Department is among the oldest CS departments
More informationABET Criterion 3: Outcomes Met By Course Content
ABET Criterion 3: Outcomes Met By Course Content This brief content assessment should be consistent with the updated Course Syllabet Course #: BEE 200: Title: The BEE experience (1 credit) Semester/Year:
More informationOREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mechanical Engineering Program Assessment 2007-08. October 16, 2008 INTRODUCTION PROGRAM MISSION STATEMENT
OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mechanical Engineering Program Assessment 2007-08 October 16, 2008 INTRODUCTION The Mechanical Engineering Program within the Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering and
More informationBachelor of Science in Computer Engineering (BSCoE) Essential Ideas
Mission Statement Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering (BSCoE) Essential Ideas The mission statement for the Computer Engineering program as modified and adopted by the engineering faculty on July
More informationMechanical Engineering Technology 2011-12 Assessment Report
Mechanical Engineering Technology 2011-12 Assessment Report I. Introduction The Bachelor of Science program in Mechanical Engineering Technology is offered in three locations Klamath Falls, Portland Metro
More informationDepartment of Accounting, Finance, & Economics
Department of Accounting, Finance, & Economics Assessment Report 2010-2011 Mission/Purpose The mission of the Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics is to provide a quality education in accounting,
More informationAssessment Processes. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Fall 2014
Assessment Processes Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Fall 2014 Introduction The assessment process in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at Utah State University
More informationAcademic Program Review SUMMARY* Department under review: Computer Science. Date self-study received in Dean s office: November 21, 2013
Academic Program Review SUMMARY* Department under review: Computer Science Date self-study received in Dean s office: November 21, 2013 Date of external consultant s review: November 2013 Date APR received
More informationDEPARTMENTAL PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
DEPARTMENTAL PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING 2014-2015 ACADEMIC YEAR Department: Mechanical Engineering Program: Bachelor of Science (B.S.) in Mechanical Engineering / Combined B.S. and Master
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAMS AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY. September 2013
GRADUATE PROGRAMS IN AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS AT TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY September 2013 This handbook contains information about graduate programs in Agricultural and Applied Economics. It supplements
More informationELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT PLAN
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT PLAN Mission Statement: The mission of the Electrical Engineering Department is to provide a quality electrical engineering education with extensive
More information1. In your department: 2. In your department: 3. Your department: Page 2. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Your college or university has been selected to be part of a national survey of calculus instruction across the United States. This research project is conducted by the Mathematical Association of America.
More informationProgram Assessment Report 2005-2006 Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) Finance
I. Program Goals Program Assessment Report 2005-2006 Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) The program goals are relevant, student oriented, specific and include the following: 1. To graduate students
More informationAssessment Plan and Program Educational Objectives. Computer Engineering Program. Electrical Engineering Program
Assessment Plan and Program Educational Objectives for the Computer Engineering Program and Electrical Engineering Program of the School of Information Technology and Engineering at George Mason University
More informationThe Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering
The Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering 420 Woolf Hall Box 19017 817-272-3092 www.uta.edu/ie Overview Industrial Engineering students will be prepared for engineering practice
More informationDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brian K. Johnson, Dept. Chair (214 Buchanan Engr. Lab. 83844-1023; phone 208/885-6554; www.ece.uidaho.edu). Faculty: Touraj Assefi, David H. Atkinson,
More informationThe College of EMS Strategic Plan can be seen at the college s WEB site
B2. PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES B2.1 Mission Statements The fundamental mission of UW-Platteville and the entire UW System is to serve the people of Wisconsin. This basic goal is expressed in detail
More informationConstruction Management Program Academic Quality Plan
Construction Management Program Academic Quality Plan Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment In addition to Goals and Objectives for the CMGT program, Student Learning Outcomes have been identified.
More informationLearning Outcomes Assessment for Building Construction Management
Learning Outcomes Assessment for Building Construction Management Building Construction Management Learning Outcomes 1. The student is prepared to assume an entry level professional constructor s role
More informationIndustrial Technology (BS/IT & MS/IT progs.) SECTION IV DRAFT (July 6, 2011)
Industrial Technology (BS/IT & MS/IT progs.) SECTION IV DRAFT (July 6, 2011) Section IV Assessment: Undergraduate and Graduate Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) courses identified in the department s assessment
More informationDepartment of Marketing College of Business Florida State University. 2007 2011 Strategic Plan
Department of Marketing College of Business Florida State University 2007 2011 Strategic Plan Updated Version Adopted December 10, 2007 International Acclaim. Individual Attention. Department of Marketing
More informationBSEE-EE Electrical Engineering Assessment Plan 2013-2017
BSEE-EE Electrical Engineering Assessment Plan 2013-2017 Program Overview Missions and Outcomes Three mission statements are provided below for the University of Cincinnati, the College of Engineering
More informationThis program is found to be viable, see report for commendations, concerns, and recommendations.
UCC Program Review Committee summary of review Program Department of Mechanical Engineering This program includes the following degrees and certificates: B.S. in Mechanical Engineering M.S. in Mechanical
More informationHow To Teach Engineering Science And Mechanics
Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 436±440, 2000 0949-149X/91 $3.00+0.00 Printed in Great Britain. # 2000 TEMPUS Publications. Recent Curriculum Changes in Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia
More informationMSU Departmental Assessment Plan 2007-2009
Department: Psychology MSU Departmental Assessment Plan 2007-2009 Department Head: Richard A. Block Assessment Coordinator: Richard A. Block Degrees/Majors/Options Offered by Department B.S. in Psychology
More informationWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering Continuous Improvement Guide
Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering Continuous Improvement Guide The intent of this document is to assist faculty, staff, students, and constituents of the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering in
More informationElectrical and Computer Engineering Undergraduate Advising Manual
Electrical and Computer Engineering Undergraduate Advising Manual Department of Engineering University of Massachusetts Boston Revised: October 5, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Mission
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES The Department of Physical Sciences offers the following undergraduate degree programs: BS in Chemistry BS in Chemistry/Engineering (offered as a dual degree program with
More informationReview of the B.S. in Computer Science 11.0701
Review of the B.S. in Computer Science 11.0701 Context and overview. The B.S. in Computer Science program is housed in the School of Information Technology within the College of Applied Science and Technology.
More informationSchool of Accounting Florida International University Strategic Plan 2012-2017
School of Accounting Florida International University Strategic Plan 2012-2017 As Florida International University implements its Worlds Ahead strategic plan, the School of Accounting (SOA) will pursue
More informationDepartment of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science College of Arts and Sciences Graduate Student Handbook
Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science College of Arts and Sciences Graduate Student Handbook Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Graduate Program and Requirements A. The Doctor
More informationPROGRAM ASSESSMENT: EDUCATION. Graduate Education
Graduate Education A. Graduate student overview The Department of Agronomy offers M.S. and Ph. D degrees in several areas of crop and soil science, and until recently, student participation has been evenly
More informationM.S. in Computational Finance and Risk Management University of Washington Seattle
May 2011 M.S. in Computational Finance and Risk Management University of Washington Seattle Introduction University of Washington (UW) proposes to offer a Master of Science in Computational Finance and
More informationTim Mrozowski A.I.A, LEED AP Professor and Program Leader Spring 2015
2015 Construction Management Program Public Information, Outcomes Assessment and Continuing Quality Improvement Plan School of Planning Design and Construction Michigan State University Tim Mrozowski A.I.A,
More informationCivil Engineering Technology- Construction Management Major Assessment and Strategic Plan
2011 Civil Engineering Technology- Construction Management Major Assessment and Strategic Plan *Updated: September, 2014 Civil Engineering Technology Department Construction Management Major 2011 Assessment
More informationABET TAC CIP Report for the Academic Year 20010 2011. Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) Program
ABET TAC CIP Report for the Academic Year 20010 2011 Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) Program I. Introduction This document reports the findings and proposed changes resulting from analysis of data
More informationAnalysis of the Effectiveness of Online Learning in a Graduate Engineering Math Course
The Journal of Interactive Online Learning Volume 1, Number 3, Winter 2003 www.ncolr.org ISSN: 1541-4914 Analysis of the Effectiveness of Online Learning in a Graduate Engineering Math Course Charles L.
More informationMASTERS SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT REPORT
MASTERS SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT REPORT This report covers the academic year 2010-2011 and includes activity during the summer of 2011 Outcomes The current mission is to prepare graduate social work
More informationMechanical Engineering Program. Policies and Procedures
Mechanical Engineering Program Policies and Procedures For M.S. and Ph.D. Degrees in Mechanical Engineering At the University of California, Merced Submitted by: Ashlie Martini Chair of the Mechanical
More informationGraduate Student Handbook
Graduate Student Handbook Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Auburn University Revised Apr. 2008 I. INTRODUCTION General regulations for graduate students at Auburn University are covered in the
More informationSTUDENT HANDBOOK. Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering
STUDENT HANDBOOK Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering Welcome to the CAEE Department This handbook is intended to support you as an entering and continuing student in the Department of Civil,
More informationRequirements for a Graduate Degree (M.S. or Ph.D.) in Oceanography at the University of Maine
Requirements for a Graduate Degree (M.S. or Ph.D.) in Oceanography at the University of Maine Mission Statement The University of Maine's Oceanography Program creates and communicates integrated understanding
More informationIs a Graduate Degree in Your Future?
Is a Graduate Degree in Your Future? Source: Source: Gary H. Bernstein, Professor and Associate Chair, and Tom Fuja, Professor and Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Electrical Engineering, University
More informationSarah A. Rajala Ernest W. & Mary Ann Deavenport, Jr. Chair and Dean Bagley College of Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS
Sarah A. Rajala Ernest W. & Mary Ann Deavenport, Jr. Chair and Dean Bagley College of Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA November 8, 2012 Background: North Carolina
More informationAssessment Summaries of ACBSP Accredited Programs. College of Management
Assessment Summaries of ACBSP Accredited Programs College of Management 2013 2014 B.S. in Business Administration Program Directors: Mark Fenton Total Student Enrollment: 719 a. Peregrine CPC Exam b. Multi-section
More informationELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
The University of Connecticut School of Engineering ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GUIDE TO COURSE SELECTION AY 2008-2009 Revised July 30, 2008 for Electrical Engineering (EE) Majors in The School of Engineering
More informationI - Institutional Information
Indiana University East - Self Study - 4/14/2016 Page 1 I - Institutional Information To complete this section, first click on the Edit/Checkout button. Then copy and paste the headings into the Institutional
More informationReview of the B.A., B.S. in Political Science 45.1001
Review of the B.A., B.S. in Political Science 45.1001 Context and overview. The B.A., B.S. in Political Science program is housed in the Department of Politics and Government within the College of Arts
More informationCouncil for Higher Education Accreditation. 2007 CHEA Award for Institutional Progress in Student Learning Outcomes
Application Summary Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (http://www.rose-hulman.edu) has pioneered the development and refinement of the RosE Portfolio System (REPS). REPS is used to assess student learning
More informationAC 2007-2230: DEVELOPING STUDENT DESIGN AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS IN AN UNDERGRADUATE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM
AC 2007-2230: DEVELOPING STUDENT DESIGN AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS IN AN UNDERGRADUATE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM Donna Ebenstein, Bucknell University Joseph Tranquillo, Bucknell University Daniel
More informationBachelor of Social Work
Indiana University School of Social Work PRAC Annual Report 2005-2006 Academic Introduction The Indiana University School of Social Work was founded in 1911. It currently offers social work education at
More informationENGINEERING PHYSICS (EE)
The University of Connecticut School of Engineering ENGINEERING PHYSICS (EE) GUIDE TO COURSE SELECTION AY 2003-2004 for Engineering Physics (EngPhys) Majors in the School of Engineering and College of
More informationSCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION MAJOR
SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT The mission of the School of Management is to prepare undergraduate business students for successful careers through a personalized, hands-on learning experience and positively impact
More informationPreparing for an ABET Accreditation Visit: Writing the Self-Study
Preparing for an ABET Accreditation Visit: Writing the Self-Study Ronald E. Barr Mechanical Engineering Department University of Texas at Austin rbarr@mail.utexas.edu Abstract Engineering faculty must
More informationUPBM CURRICULAR BROCHURE
UPBM CURRICULAR BROCHURE Undergraduate Program in Biology and Medicine Contents Academic Year 2015-16 About the Undergraduate Program in Biology and Medicine...pg. 1 Undergraduate Majors...pg. 2-3 Getting
More informationELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
The University of Connecticut School of Engineering ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GUIDE TO COURSE SELECTION AY 2013-2014 Revised January 31, 2014 for Electrical Engineering (EE) Majors in The School of Engineering
More informationProgram Review Document Department of Accounting
Program Review Document Department of Accounting A. Summarized Review of Degree Program Report 1. Mission, Centrality, and Uniqueness The mission of the Department of Accounting at Kansas State University
More informationBoise State University Department of Construction Management. 2013-2014 Quality Assessment Report and Action Plan
Boise State University Department of Construction Management 2013-2014 Quality Assessment Report and Action Plan November 25, 2014 Executive Summary The Construction Management program is accredited by
More informationCollege of Business. Role and Mission. Idaho Falls Programs. EITC/Idaho State University Program. Undergraduate Curriculum Learning Goals.
2015-16 Idaho State University Undergraduate Catalog 1 College of Business Faculty Dean Thomas Ottaway, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Information Assurance Corey Schou, Ph.D. Associate Dean Joanne Tokle, Ph.D.
More informationEvaluation of Undergraduate Academic Programs. Self-Study Guidelines
Evaluation of Undergraduate Academic Programs Self-Study Guidelines Office of the Provost Fall 2009 Purpose This guide is designed to support academic unit efforts to evaluate undergraduate academic programs
More informationAGENDA ITEM III C PROPOSED ACADEMIC PROGRAM LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY
AGENDA ITEM III C PROPOSED ACADEMIC PROGRAM LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY Ph.D. IN INDUSTRIAL/ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AGENDA ITEM III C PROPOSED ACADEMIC PROGRAM LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY Ph.D. IN INDUSTRIAL/ORGANIZATIONAL
More informationAssessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Undergraduate Program. Assessment Measures
Assessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Undergraduate Program Assessment Measures The Department of Psychology uses the following measures to assess departmental learning
More informationACCEND Handbook. Developed by. CEAS Undergraduate Affairs and Graduate Studies Offices
ACCEND Handbook Developed by CEAS Undergraduate Affairs and Graduate Studies Offices June 2014 Purpose of the ACCelerated ENgineering Degree (ACCEND) Programs The Accelerated Engineering Degree programs
More informationGraduate Faculty Committee Doc. No. 1075A Approved April 20, 2009
Graduate Faculty Committee Doc. No. 1075A Approved April 20, 2009 TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEWS FOR THE REVIEW OF THE MASTER OF SCIENCE AND
More informationProposal B.S. in Civil Engineering PNC Long Version
1. Characteristics of the Program a. Campuses Offering Program Purdue University North Central b. Scope of Delivery North Central Campus c. Model of Delivery Classroom d. Other Delivery Aspects (Co ops,
More informationWe present the salient features of our 5 year plan in italics and for each item present its mid-term status in bold.
Department of Physics Graduate Program (PhD and MS) January 2015, Midterm Update for Five Year Plan (June 2012-2017) We present the salient features of our 5 year plan in italics and for each item present
More informationNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY. College: College of Business. Department: Inter-Departmental. Program: Master of Business Administration
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY College: College of Business Department: Inter-Departmental Program: Master of Business Administration CIP Code: 52.0201 Northern Illinois University s M.B.A. program follows
More informationDEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK. April 2015
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK April 2015 Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-3113 Voice: 509-335-8645
More informationFINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Graduate Review of Management Science (MASc, MMSc, MMSc online, PhD and undergraduate option) May 2013
FINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Graduate Review of Management Science (MASc, MMSc, MMSc online, PhD and undergraduate option) May 2013 Review Process The Self Study was produced in the context of Engineering s
More informationAssessment Plans. for. Computer Engineering Programs
Plans for Computer Engineering Programs Spring 2015 1 Introduction The CpE B.S and M.S. degree programs at California State University, Sacramento are joint programs supported by both the Computer Science
More informationENGLISH DEPARTMENT GRADUATE HANDBOOK UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON JANUARY 2015
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT GRADUATE HANDBOOK UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON JANUARY 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS General Information...3 Academic Calendar...4 Forms...4 Registering for Courses...4 General Courses...4
More informationThe Florida State University Department of Statistics Graduate Handbook
The Florida State University Department of Statistics Graduate Handbook 2014 1 Contents 1 Introduction... 2 2 Graduate Degrees... 3 2.1 Combined BS/MS Degree... 3 2.2 Master of Science Degrees... 5 2.2.1
More informationCalifornia State University Dominguez Hills. College of Business Administration & Public Policy 2014-2015. Program website: http://mpa.csudh.
California State University Dominguez Hills College of Business Administration & Public Policy 2014-2015 Program website: http://mpa.csudh.edu Master of Public Administration Student Handbook Program policies
More informationTeaching Signals and Systems through Portfolios, Writing, and Independent Learning
Session 2632 Teaching Signals and Systems through Portfolios, Writing, and Independent Learning Richard Vaz, Nicholas Arcolano WPI I. Introduction This paper describes an integrated approach to outcome-driven
More informationThe University of Tennessee Diversity Plan College/Dept.: Computer Science
The University of Tennessee Diversity Plan College/Dept.: Computer Science Goal One: Create and sustain a welcoming, supportive and inclusive campus climate. To provide such an environment for undergraduates,
More informationERAU Aerospace Engineering Program Educational Objectives and Student Outcomes
ERAU Aerospace Engineering Program Educational Objectives and Student Outcomes Our Aerospace Engineering (AE) Program is accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of the Accreditation
More informationPotential Career Tracks Associated With the APS Undergraduate Major
Potential Career Tracks Associated With the APS Undergraduate Major This document is an outline of the various career paths that recent APS graduates have taken. We encourage all majors to read these descriptions
More informationSTUDENT HANDBOOK WKU/UK JOINT BACHELOR OF SCIENCE PROGRAM IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AUGUST 2010
STUDENT HANDBOOK WKU/UK JOINT BACHELOR OF SCIENCE PROGRAM IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY EBS 2101 BOWLING GREEN, KY 42101 WWW.WKU.EDU/ENGINEERING AUGUST
More informationDepartment of Construction
Department of Construction Program Quality Assessment Plan I. Description of Program s Assessment Procedures and Process The program quality assessment plan of the Department of Construction identifies
More informationAC 2012-3560: FROM DEFENSE TO DEGREE: INTEGRATING MILI- TARY VETERANS INTO ENGINEERING PROGRAMS
AC 2012-3560: FROM DEFENSE TO DEGREE: INTEGRATING MILI- TARY VETERANS INTO ENGINEERING PROGRAMS Dr. David L. Soldan, Kansas State University Dr. Noel N. Schulz, Kansas State University Dr. Don Gruenbacher,
More informationGraduate Program Review of EE and CS
Graduate Program Review of EE and CS The site visit for the Graduate Program Review of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science took place on April 3-4. It included meetings with many constituencies
More informationUndergraduate Degree Map for Completion in Four Years
Page 1 of 8 Undergraduate Degree Map for Completion in Four Years College: College of Science, Engineering & Technology Department: Elec. & Computer Engineering Name of Program: ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
More information(Your name and Date) Assessment Questionnaire For the ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM (02/01/2012)
(Your name and Date) Assessment Questionnaire For the ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM (02/01/2012) A group of professional engineering organizations, including the Accreditation Board for Engineering and
More informationElectrical Engineering Technology(BS) and Computer Engineering Technology Assessment Plan
BSEET-EET and BSCET-CET Electrical Engineering Technology(BS) and Computer Engineering Technology Assessment Plan The UC EET and CET Academic Quality plan described in this document identifies the process
More informationMASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION OPTIONS
Overview MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION (INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP) AND CERTIFICATION OPTIONS Neumann University s graduate program leading to the Master of Science in Education: Instructional Leadership
More informationDEPARTMENT OF NURSING C.W.POST CAMPUS LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK
DEPARTMENT OF NURSING C.W.POST CAMPUS LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK C.W. POST CAMPUS DEPARTMENT OF NURSING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS MISSION STATEMENT FOR
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS Master s and PhD Programs Goals and Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Master of Science in Physics I. Program Description
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS Master s and PhD Programs Goals and Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The Department of Physics at The Catholic University of America offers graduate programs leading to the
More informationThe Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
The Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering 204 Woolf Hall Box 19023 817-272-2561 www.uta.edu/mae Overview The Department of Mechanical and Aerospace
More informationPROGRAM PUBLIC INFORMATION
Department of Civil Engineering & Construction Management College Of Engineering and Computer Science California State University-Northridge Northridge, Ca Construction Management Program PROGRAM PUBLIC
More informationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY EAST BAY COMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC PLANNING AND REVIEW. Committee on Academic Program Review
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY EAST BAY COMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC PLANNING AND REVIEW Designation Code: 06-07 CAPR 12 Date Submitted: May 10, 2007 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PURPOSE: ACTION REQUESTED: Academic Senate
More informationAll students are admitted during the summer and begin their coursework in the fall. Students must commit to completing these courses in sequence.
Department of Special Education Initial Licensure and Added Endorsement the Special Education Generalist Overview and Assessment Plan Purpose for Program Change In the Fall of 2013 the Department of Special
More informationAssessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Master s and PhD Programs. Assessment Measures
Assessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Master s and PhD Programs Assessment Measures The Department of Psychology uses the following measures to assess departmental learning
More informationProgram Review Committee. Committee member 1. Dr. John M. Emmert, Professor. Committee member 2. Dr. Arnab Shaw, Professor
College: College of Engineering and Computer Science Department: Electrical Engineering Academic Programs Reviewed Program 1. B.S. in Electrical Engineering Program 2. M.S. in Electrical Engineering Program
More information