EXAM FOR INFOTECH SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR REAL-TIME SYSTEMS. Suggested Solution WS 13/14. - Without Engagement -



Similar documents
Certified Software Quality Engineer (CSQE) Body of Knowledge

1) Testing of general knowledge 25%. Each right question counts 1. Each wrong counts 0.5. Empty

Sample Exam Syllabus

Model Based System Engineering (MBSE) For Accelerating Software Development Cycle

Making model-based development a reality: The development of NEC Electronics' automotive system development environment in conjunction with MATLAB

Continuous???? Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.

Life Cycle Quality Gates

1. True or False? A voltage level in the range 0 to 2 volts is interpreted as a binary 1.

EHOOKS Prototyping is Rapid Again

Chapter 7c Project Cash Flow. Dave Ludwick

Best Practices for Improving the Quality and Speed of Your Agile Testing

Entwicklung und Testen von Robotischen Anwendungen mit MATLAB und Simulink Maximilian Apfelbeck, MathWorks

for esigntrust Personal Secure Enrollment and Generation Guide Operation Guide Microsoft Windows System & Internet Explorer Users

Model-based Testing of Automotive Systems

Benefits of Test Automation for Agile Testing

Agile Model-Based Systems Engineering (ambse)

How Configuration Management Tools Address the Challenges of Configuration Management

Software Requirements, Third Edition

Software Project Management

Static Analysis of Dynamic Properties - Automatic Program Verification to Prove the Absence of Dynamic Runtime Errors

Module 11. Software Project Planning. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

EZ DUPE DVD/CD Duplicator

The Art of the Possible Scheduling Options in SAP. Mark W. Scott Vesta Partners, LLC

AGILE ANALYSIS AVOIDING PARALYSIS: AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR RESPONSIVE PROJECT ANALYSIS 1

SOLARWINDS ORION. Patch Manager Evaluation Guide for ConfigMgr 2012

Ethical Policy for the Journals of the London Mathematical Society

Best Practices for Verification, Validation, and Test in Model- Based Design

Mastering Microsoft Project 2013

(Refer Slide Time: 01:52)

Progress Report Aspect Oriented Programming meets Design Patterns. Academic Programme MSc in Advanced Computer Science. Guillermo Antonio Toro Bayona

Use software to define silicon p. 15

Module 1 Study Guide

Software Development & Education Center. Microsoft Office (Microsoft Project 2010)

Installation, Licensing, and Activation License Administration Guide

Product Lifecycle Management. Diane Ryan Siemens PLM Software

IronBee Open Source Web Application Firewall

Peer Review Process Description

Project Time Management

SRM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

SELECTING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE

A Practical Guide to Test Case Types in Java

pm4dev, 2015 management for development series Project Schedule Management PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS

Automatic ASAM MCD-3 supported test. PikeTec GmbH Dr. Jens Lüdemann

Critical Systems Validation. Objectives

Peer Review Process Description

NE-50413B Mastering Microsoft Project 2010

ICS 121 Lecture Notes Spring Quarter 96

Requirements Management im Kontext von DevOps

The ConTract Model. Helmut Wächter, Andreas Reuter. November 9, 1999

The Web AppSec How-to: The Defenders Toolbox

Body of Knowledge General Knowledge (16 questions) Quality principles Benefits of software quality Organizational and process benchmarking

Chapter 8 Software Testing

Malware isn t The only Threat on Your Endpoints

Lean for Law: Legal Process Improvement Checklist

CS 589 Project Smart Home Hub, Phase I Due before 9am on October 21, 2015

CURRICULUM for Diploma of Technology in Project Management

Co-Presented by Mr. Bill Rinko-Gay and Dr. Constantin Stanca 9/28/2011

Process Models and Metrics

EE289 Lab Fall LAB 4. Ambient Noise Reduction. 1 Introduction. 2 Simulation in Matlab Simulink

Project Management Dr. James A. Bednar

i-pcgrid Workshop 2015 Cyber Security for Substation Automation The Jagged Line between Utility and Vendors

Cyclic Architectures in UML

Crossing the DevOps Chasm

TDWI strives to provide course books that are content-rich and that serve as useful reference documents after a class has ended.

Collaborative and Agile Project Management

Agile Training and Certification Options. David Hicks

ADRIAN DAVIS INFORMATION SECURITY FORUM

Seven Practical Steps to Delivering More Secure Software. January 2011

JOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY

Change Management for Rational DOORS User s Guide

White Paper. Process Improvement

Development of AUTOSAR Software Components within Model-Based Design

Big Data and Security: At the Edge of Prediction

CASE TOOLS. Contents

Ob j ect-oriented Project Management with UML

Online Course Syllabus

Account Create for Outlook Express

Time Management. Part 5 Schedule Development. Richard Boser

Chapter 7: Software Engineering

GETTING STARTED WITH LABVIEW POINT-BY-POINT VIS

Converting Models from Floating Point to Fixed Point for Production Code Generation

How To Manage Test Data Management At Sqs.Com

Best Practices, Process

Next-Generation Performance Testing with Service Virtualization and Application Performance Management

MATH COLLEGE ALGEBRA Spring 2014 KANSAS ALGEBRA PROGRAM (KAP)

Software Testing. Knowledge Base. Rajat Kumar Bal. Introduction

Mastering Microsoft Project 2013 Course: 55054A Course Length: 3 Days

IMEO International Mass Event Organization based on Recent Experience of Euro 2012

How To Improve A Test Process

IBM Rational Rhapsody

Programmable Logic Controllers Definition. Programmable Logic Controllers History

On Quantitative Software Quality Assurance Methodologies for Cardiac Pacemakers

Quality Assurance in an Agile Environment

SECTION 2 PROGRAMMING & DEVELOPMENT

2 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION TECHNIQUES

Scrum: A disciplined approach to product quality and project success.

Importance of Project Schedules. matter what happens on a project. projects, especially during the second half of projects

Mastering Microsoft Project B; 3 days, Instructor-led

Efficient and Faster PLC Software Development Process for Automotive industry. Demetrio Cortese IVECO Embedded Software Design

Brillig Systems Making Projects Successful

Transcription:

EXAM FOR INFOTECH SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR REAL-TIME SYSTEMS Suggested Solution WS 13/14 - Without Engagement - Task Theme Points Time required in min. 1 Analysis and Design 15 30 2 Basics and Test 10 25 3 Project Management 15 35 4 Questions 20 30 Remark Sum 60.0 120 1

Task 1: Analysis and Design (15 Points) Question 1.1 Figure.1 Context Diagram Question 1.2 DFD0 SkyParking Figure.2 DFD0 Diagram 2

Question 1.3 Figure.3 Data Dictionary Question 1.4 Modular Diagram 3

Task 2: Basics and Test (10 Points) Question 2.1: ER Diagram 4

Question 2.2: Control Flow Diagram 5

Question 2.3: Test Cases We need 6 test cases: Paper ID: 3612 Presentation date: 23. Sept Starting time: 10:30 End time: 11:00 Paper ID: 2584 Presentation date: 24. Sept Starting time: 10:30 End time: 11:00 Paper ID: 1764 Presentation date: 24. Sept Starting time: 09:30 End time: 10:00 Paper ID: 4983 Presentation date: 24. Sept Starting time: 11:30 End time: 12:00 Paper ID: 6525 Presentation date: 24. Sept Starting time: 10:10 End time: 10:40 Press exit button 6

Task 3: Project Management (15 Points) Question 3.1: Effort Estimation Phase Inception Elaboration Construction Transition Activity 15% 10% 45% 30% Analysing 65% 10% 10% 15% Designing 20% 55% 10% 10% Programming 5% 15% 60% 35% Testing 10% 20% 20% 40% Total Effort = 3.6 * (85 KLOC) 1.2 = 744 PM The effort for Inception = 0.15 * 744 = 111.6 PM The effort for Elaboration = 0.10 * 744 = 74.4 PM The effort for Construction = 0.45 * 744 = 334.8 PM The effort for Transition = 0.30 * 744 = 223.2 PM 7

Software Engineering for Real-Time Systems Institute of Industrial Automation and Software Engineering Question 3.2: Gantt Diagram 8

Question 3.3: Net Plan Question 3.4: Project Delay The project will not be delayed. 9

Task4: Questions 1) Briefly explain the quality requirements efficiency and security following the ISO 9126. How are these quality requirements of efficiency and security related to each other? Describe a concrete scenario from industry where they can negatively impact each other. Solution: - Efficiency: The sum of all attributes of a system which contribute towards performance of the software and the amount of resources used, under stated conditions. Examples include time behaviors, resource utilization, and efficiency compliance in real-time systems - Security: The sum of all attributes of a system which contribute towards ensuring that it can neither be accidentally nor deliberately be attacked or manipulated. Information security implies that the product will not do anything with the processed or managed information which is not explicitly intended by its specification. - Efficiency and security are related. For instance efficiency (performance) might be decreased when security dominates. Reliability positively impacts safety and security. - Example: A real-time system with many transactions in a distributed sensor network can have reduced efficiency, if these transactions are individually encrypted on a too low level. 2) Explain test driven development (TDD)? Where is it used and with which benefits? Solution: TDD is used in design of code. The unit test case is constructed before the respective code is written. This assures that the code would later run against these test cases which can be used as regression test with incremental add-ons, etc. 3) What is an assertion in software engineering? Why is it used? Solution: An assertion is a predicate (a true false statement) placed in a program to indicate that the developer thinks that the predicate is always true at that place. If an assertion evaluates to false at run-time, an assertion failure results, which typically causes execution to abort. This draws attention to the location at which the logical inconsistency is detected and can be preferable to the behavior that would otherwise result. 4) Why is it necessary to periodically improve software development and management processes? Explain the need for process improvement by using the case of not keeping schedule commitments what companies can do to get better. Solution: 10

Process improvement assures competitiveness in a fast changing market with rather low entry barriers. Generally companies invest if there is a return. Companies invest in process excellence because it pays off. There is a positive business case! Example: If projects routinely miss their schedule commitments, this is an indicator of poor planning and bad project management. Typically it comes along withz insufficient requirements engineering, change management or quality control. They identify root causes for being late, such as insufficient planning or defecting defects too late or having too many requirements changing. Then they take action to improve these root causes, such as establishing better estimation and WBS or implementing early defect removal and strong quality gates, or requirements change control board and traceability. 5) What is model in the loop and how is it used? Why is it used and what are its advantages? Solution: Model in the Loop (MIL) is the simulation of an embedded system in an early development phase, the modeling in model-based software development. Embedded systems interact with their environment and often expect plausible sensor signals as input and then stimulate the physical system. To function properly, the environment of the embedded system has to be simulated. Now, if the embedded system (model) simulated in a loop together with the environment model, one speaks of a Model in the Loop Simulation. MIL is an inexpensive way to test embedded systems. Development and simulation environment for model-based development, for example, MATLAB / Simulink. 6) What are ethical conflicts in engineering? Mention three potential conflicts and what could be constructively done on the engineering level. Solution: - An engineer observes a colleague downloading protected code and including pieces to his work. Recommendation: speak with him and explain copyright and intellectual property issues. - A product manager agrees a schedule with the client without having finished the analysis. Recommendation: explain the manager that with this approach he will miss deadlines and thus create extra cost for the company. Also clients won t like yes-sayers which later fail. - A project manager wants to keep schedule and declares several test cases as resolved. Recommendation: Explain to that project manager or to the quality responsible that you consider the software insufficiently tested and show why. Suggest doing few critical tests and check the amount of defects found. Delivering insufficient quality typically means that customers are annoyed and penalties have to be paid. On top the cost of non-quality is much higher than doing it right first. - For performance reasons in a real-time embedded system a critical watch-dog function is switched off. The project manager is unaware. 11

Recommendation: talk with the responsible engineering manager that here is a short-term patch which will sooner or later mean failure with expensive rework. 12