INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW FORM FOR PROJECTS USING HUMAN SUBJECTS



Similar documents
State University of New York at Canton Institutional Review Board. Sample Informed Consent Document

Address Co-Principal Investigator Information Co- Principal Investigator Faculty Staff Grad. Student Undergrad. Student

Instructions for Form: Application for Claim of Exemption

Hamline University Graduate School of Education Human Subjects Research: Non-Exempt (Long) Form

PLEASE BE AWARE that you cannot begin the project until you have received notification that the exemption has been granted.

Miami University: Human Subjects Research General Research Application Guidance

Claim of Exemption Form Page 1 of 6

The effect of mood and cognitive load on nonverbal sensitivity. Name (first, middle initial, last): Maurice J. Levesque

Institutional Review Board for the Use of Human Subjects in Research GUIDELINES FOR A PROPOSAL NARRATIVE

Institutional Review Board Human Research Approval Form

Revision(s) to an Approved Study Form

Human Subjects Research at OSU

IRB Application for Medical Records Review Request

CONSENT FORM TEMPLATE FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS PARTICIPATING IN RESEARCH

Clarkson College Institutional Review Board Application Manual

IRB 101: HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM

BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)

The JSU IRB. IRB Membership

Hobart and William Smith Colleges. Colleges of the Seneca Form C. Application to Conduct Course-based Student Research with Human Subjects

Document Template #1 Adult/General Informed Consent (Rev. 9/20/2011)

Submission Date: Project Start Date: Approximate Project End Date:

Institutional Review Board

To IRB, or Not to IRB? That Is the Question!

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) INVESTIGATOR GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS

IRB 101: HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM

CIIS Human Research Review Committee HRRC APPLICATION PACKET

Honours and Coursework Masters Projects Application for Faculty Ethics Approval

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

GUIDELINGS FOR PSYCHOLOGY STUDENT RESEARCH PARTICIPATION

MA THESIS AND MA CAPSTONE PROJECT GUIDELINES. MA in Corporate Communication. Communication Studies Department

SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION

A Guide to the Preparation of Research Ethics Applications

FILLING OUT YOUR HUMAN ETHICS APPLICATION Please consult these specific notes

EVALUATION BRIEF Understanding the Institutional Review Board (IRB) January 2008

Research Ethics Review Committee (WHO ERC)

Educational Research To IRB, or Not to IRB?

UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH AAHRPP Preparation UC Davis Human Research Part IV Criteria for Review. Cindy Gates IRB Administration

Toronto School of Theology Guidelines for the Preparation and Ethics Review of Doctor of Ministry Thesis Projects Involving Human Subjects

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

Procedures for Requests to Conduct Research

The Michigan State University Institute for Health Policy (IHP) is recruiting a sample of office based primary care providers to be interviewed

RESEARCH PARTICIPANT INFORMED CONSENT AND PRIVACY AUTHORIZATION FORM

Ethics in Psychology Research. Why are ethics important in research? Recruitment

Nova Southeastern University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures

SECTION ETHICAL PRINCIPLES OF CONDUCT FOR THE SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROFESSIONAL

AASP Ethics Committee Report Comparing the APA and AASP Ethics Codes Submitted to the AASP Executive Board Fall, 2007

Ethical Principles in Clinical Research. Christine Grady Department of Bioethics NIH Clinical Center

Andrew Elman LPC ATR PROFESSIONAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

PreK 12 Practicum and Internship. School Counseling. Overview

ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY Compliance Policies and Procedures

Human Subjects Research (HSR) Series

School of Medicine Ethics Committee Miscellaneous Policies:

Undergraduate Social Work Program Field Practicum Planning Guide for the Academic Year

RE: Human Research Subject Protections Under Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) M- 1073

HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT (HIPAA): FACT SHEET FOR NEUROPSYCHOLOGISTS Division 40, American Psychological Association

SOP 502L: INTERNET/SOCIAL MEDIA-BASED RESEARCH

MRS Guidelines for Online Research. January 2012

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) INFORMED CONSENT HANDBOOK. Information and Templates for Investigators. Prepared by the Office of Research

at Community Colleges (Revised 2013)

Guidance Notes for L&LS Ethics approval

University of Hawai i Human Studies Program. Guidelines for Developing a Clinical Research Protocol

PARALEGAL INTERNSHIPS INFORMATION AND REQUIRED FORMS

NM Counseling and Therapy Practice Board Code of Ethics

ISSUING AGENCY: Regulation and Licensing Department Counseling and Therapy Practice Board [ NMAC- Rp 16 NMAC

MRIA CODE OF CONDUCT FOR MARKET AND SOCIAL MEDIA RESEARCH. Appendix E GUIDELINE FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Texas State University. Sociology Department. Handbook. MA with a Major in Sociology. MS with a Major in Applied Sociology. 7 th Edition (2015)

Family Focused Therapy for Bipolar Disorder (Clinical Case Series) Participant Information Sheet

CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR'S MANUAL FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS FOR REVIEW BY THE CUNY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS

MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH STUDENT MANUAL

CLINICAL RESEARCH DATA COLLECTION STUDY Cervical Spine Patients Treated with Cox Technic

IRB USE ONLY: Proposal # Approval # GOUCHER COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROPOSAL FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW

Code of Federal Regulations. TITLE 45 PUBLIC WELFARE Department of Health and Human Services PART 46 PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS

NATIONAL BOARD FOR CERTIFIED COUNSELORS (NBCC) CODE OF ETHICS

Gersh & Sarah Lemberg Children'ʹs Center, Inc. 457 Old South St, MS #044, Brandeis University Waltham, MA

PACIFIC EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION CORPORATION (the Corporation )

NAVIGATING ETHICAL APPROVAL AND ACCESS IN SOCIAL CARE RESEARCH

STANDARDS FOR PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE FOR MEMBERS OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS PREFACE

How To Balance Research And Education In A Medical Program

RESEARCH STUDY PROTOCOL. Study Title. Name of the Principal Investigator

Guidelines for Developing an Informed Consent for Participants to Participate in a Research Project or Experiment

Study Protocol Template

Guidance on IRB Continuing Review of Research

Invitation to participate in a research project. Research assistant, to be hired

Minimum Education Requirements for DoD Personnel Involved in Human Research Protection

EDF 3214: Human Development and Learning Section 901 Meeting Time: Mondays from 5-9 Room: CPR 256

Masters of Science (M.S.) in Rehabilitation Counseling Program (RCP)

Program Assessment Report. Unit Psychology Program name: Clinical Psychology MA Completed by David Grilly May 2007

RESEARCH APPLICATION RESOURCE GUIDE

ETHICAL CONDUCT AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE: PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS FOR MEMBERS OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS

Nova Southeastern University IRB - Consent Form Checklist Version Date: 02/17/2010

IHE Master's of School Administration Performance Report. Western Carolina University

Faculty of Science and Engineering Ethics Committee Expedited Form for research involving human participants

InterOffice Memorandum

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY HANDBOOK

UAB Psychology Department Participant Pool Guide for Researchers 1 GUIDE FOR RESEARCHERS CONDUCTING RESEARCH WITH INTRODUCTORY PSYCHOLOGY STUDENTS

University of King's College Research Ethics Policy

Guidance on Withdrawal of Subjects from Research: Data Retention and Other Related Issues

Human Research Seminar Series: Informed Consent Process & HIPAA Authorization Requirements

Principal Investigator and Sub Investigator Responsibilities

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, COUNSELING, AND POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION STUDENT OUTCOMES, COMPETENCIES, AND METHODS OF ASSESSMENT

Transcription:

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW FORM FOR PROJECTS USING HUMAN SUBJECTS Investigators are responsible for ensuring that the rights and welfare of human subjects participating in research activities are protected, and that methods used and information provided to gain subject consent are appropriate to the research. The IRB will review only those assignments, activities, or investigations that are defined as research. CFR 46.102). Course projects whose primary intent and design are pedagogical, and are not originally intended to contribute to the general body of knowledge, are not normally subject to IRB review. However, it is the position of the IRB that the individual faculty member retains ethical responsibility for the proper conduct of such instructional studies. All the research activities involving the use of human beings as research subjects (participants) must be reviewed and approved by the Elon University Institutional Review Board (IRB), unless the IRB chair determines that the research falls into one or more of the categories of exemption established by federal regulation. These categories include research conducted in commonly accepted educational settings involving normal educational practices such as research on regular and special education instructional strategies, research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods. Also exempt is research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior. However, each category of exemption contains specific exceptions. Please note that only the IRB may make the determination if the research qualifies for exemption under Title 45 CFR 46.101. Investigators may not solicit subject participation or begin data collection until they have received approval or written concurrence that research has been determined to be exempt from the Institutional Review Board. Students may not serve as Principal Investigator on an IRB study and should work with their faculty mentor, instructor, etc as a Co- Investigator when submitting an IRB application. Application forms are available on the Internet at www.elon.edu/irb. The form may be downloaded and completed but must be submitted in both electronic and hard copy due to signature requirements. If you have questions about the IRB application form or about the review process, contact: Stephen Bailey Chair, IRB Phone: 278 6346 / baileys@elon.edu The Institutional Review Board generally meets on an ad hoc basis as proposals are submitted for review. Applicants must allow a minimum of 2 weeks for the review process. Allow for extra time if proposal is submitted during the summer or winter term. Proposals describing research that involves more than minimal risk to participants (any harm anticipated in the proposed research that is more probable or of greater magnitude than that ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests) will require a full review, which will occur during the monthly standing IRB meeting. Contact the IRB Chair for meeting times. Elon IRB Review Form for Projects Using Human Participants (rev. 6/09), page 1

responsibility of the researcher(s) to see that the form is given to any agency which may require it. Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46 (45 CFR 46) Protection of Human Subjects specifies federal regulations for the conduct of research involving human subjects. See especially sections 46.102 Definitions, 46.116 General Requirements for Informed Consent, and 46.117 Documentation of Informed Consent. The document is available at http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm. See references throughout this application to 45 CFR 46. INSTRUCTIONS: Your responses to the 20 determination about the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects in your research. Your responses should be clear, complete, and easy to understand. Place your typewritten response immediately under each question (not on a separate sheet). It is important that you Copies of the following must be included with this form: 1. The letter/script that will be used to inform participants of the nature of the research. 2. The informed consent template the subject(s) will sign (samples appropriate to behavioral and biomedical research are available at www.elon.edu/irb). 3. Copies of surveys, instruments or measures, questionnaires, interview schedules, focus group questions and/or other materials used to collect data. Submit one complete hard copy and one digital copy (as a.docx or.pdf file, via e- mail or disk) to: Stephen Bailey Chair, IRB 2085 CB (baileys@elon.edu) Elon IRB Review Form for Projects Using Human Participants (rev. 6/09), page 2

Title Page: Review Form for Projects Using Human Subjects For office use only PROTOCOL NUMBER: PROTOCOL TYPE: Elon University Exempted Expedited Full Research Project Title An Ethnography of the Gaming Community in Burlington, NC Principal Investigator Note: Students cannot serve as PI (Professor, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, Instructor, Other (please specify) require prior approval.) Tom Mould Anthropology Signature: Date: CB 2035 / (336) 278-5746 tmould@elon.edu Co- Investigator (Faculty, Staff, Graduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Other (please specify)) Student Erika L. Lassiter Anthropology Signature: Date: CB 8627/ (336) 675-6314 elassiter@elon.edu IF MORE THAN ONE CO- INVESTIGATOR, PROCEED TO NEXT PAGE Elon IRB Review Form for Projects Using Human Participants (rev. 6/09), page 3

Co- Investigator (Faculty, Staff, Graduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Other (please specify)) Signature: Date: Co- Investigator (Faculty, Staff, Graduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Other (please specify)) Signature: Date: Co- Investigator (Faculty, Staff, Graduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Other (please specify)) Signature: Date: NOTE: If more than four co- investigators will be listed, copy box on form and fill in additional information as needed. Elon IRB Review Form for Projects Using Human Participants (rev. 6/09), page 4

Application Questions Please type your responses. INTRODUCTION TO THE PROPOSED RESEARCH 1. Provide the date when you propose to begin research and the date when you anticipate that research will be completed. Proposed start date: September 11, 2009 Anticipated completion date: December 15, 2009 2. Indicate any source(s) of funding for the proposed research i.e., department funds or grants. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED RESEARCH 3. Provide a brief (1 page or less) description of the purpose of your research. As students at Elon University, we are working as a group to produce a video ethnography on the topic of gaming. Gaming is where players assume fictional roles, as in RPGs, but unlike RPGs huge numbers of players interact with each other in their own virtual reality. This research will be conducted Program for Ethnographic Research and Documentary Studies (PERCS) for use by faculty, students, and any interested public. Our goal is to depict what it means to be part of this culture. We will be focusing on the events, language and symbolic interactionism that gamers share in common. We will be talking to a number of people involved in gaming in Burlington N.C. to get a broad understanding of the community and activity. Our key form of research will come from immersing ourselves in the gaming community and being actively involved in their activities. We are hoping to bridge the gap of gaming awareness and make this research relatable to anyone who enjoys gaming. 4. Indicate the setting or location(s) where research will be conducted. Attach letters of support or agreement, as necessary, showing that you have permission to conduct research at that location. If you are interacting with human subjects outside of the United States, describe what procedures are required to adhere to the human subjects mandates for the country where data collection will take place. Fieldwork will be conducted in Burlington N.C. No formal permission is required for such fieldwork, nor is such permission relevant, as individuals choose to participate or not based on their own interests. 5. Does the proposed research require that you deceive participants in any way? Yes X No 6. deception you will use, indicate why it is necessary for this study, and provide a copy of the debriefing script. 7. Describe in detail what will happen to or be required of subjects in your investigation. Elon IRB Review Form for Projects Using Human Participants (rev. 6/09), page 5

(include a description of any instruments used, sample of questionnaires, focus group questions, etc.) Participants volunteer as active members of the community under study. They are part of this research if they voluntarily agree to talk to researchers and invite them into their lives to observe them in the course of their daily lives. The research design will incorporate a traditional ethnographic toolkit and methodology including immersion in the lives of our research population. This research emphasizes culture rather than individuals. It will involve keeping detailed field notes, using a tape recorder for informal and semi-structured interviews, and photographic equipment to record public life with appropriate permission. The field notes will be taken on a daily basis. The taped interviews will be transcribed and incorporated in my field notes. Interviews will be conducted formally and informally. The semi-structured interviews will evolve from focused observations and will include open-ended questions. gaming and what it is like to be a gamer. Specific questions cannot be established prior to the ethnographic experience because ethnography is an iterative process. The questions in both formal and informal interviews will evolve through time and will be modified by the research setting. Video will be of public behavior of groups of people and/or individuals with the intent for use in a video documentary. Approval will always be sought prior to shooting. A written consent form will be given to people who are videotaped as primary subjects, as in the case of interviews. RISKS AND BENEFITS 8. Describe any potential physical or psychological risks or problems that a research participant may encounter by participating in this investigation. Also describe how you plan to minimize these risks. Examples of risks and problems include but are not limited to physical injury, painful simulation, deception, coercion, embarrassment, lack of confidentiality, lack of full disclosure, and lack of feedback for subjects. If appropriate, include a description of any special qualification or training by investigators that will be used to minimize risk for the subject (e.g. CPR certification). There is no additional risk involved in this study for the research population. We are guided by the Elon IRB Ethics of the American Anthropological Association y paramount responsibility is to those involved in the study and everything within my power will be done to protect their physical, social, psychological welfare and to honor their dignity and privacy (from Podolefsky 1989:214). 9. Describe the potential benefits of conducting this research. List the benefits to the participants themselves, contributions to the field of knowledge, and benefits to society as a whole. If the research participants will not receive any direct benefits from participating in this study, indicate this in your response. There are no real or potential benefits to the research population other than the production of documents that are relevant to their culture. Specifically, we will be sending copies of the video ethnography to primary participants in the study. PARTICIPANTS 10. Indicate the total number of participants you require, and your sampling procedure. Elon IRB Review Form for Projects Using Human Participants (rev. 6/09), page 6

Ethnographic research depends upon a convenience sample where informants are chosen based on their professed cultural knowledge of a particular topic and a community recognized proficiency in the culture. The researchers will traverse the three stages of participant-observation: entry into the community via both individual initiative and go-betweens within the community, who then introduce the researchers to informants, establishing rapport and understanding the culture. We will then work most closely with key informants who exhibit the most extensive knowledge of the community and who are willing to work with us. While this work does not require a specific number of participants, we expect to talk to between 5-10 people. 11. Do you plan to use vulnerable subjects in your investigation? Yes _X No Examples of vulnerable subjects include students, children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled persons, or economically disadvantaged persons. 12. Describe the type and source of subjects required (i.e., single parents at Elon, psychology classes, patients at Alamance Regional Medical Center, sixth graders at Turrentine Middle School, etc.). Please see #10. In particular, we expect to talk to people who have been a part of the gaming community anywhere from a few months to a few years. Most of our participants will be above the age of 18 with the exception of a few minors that we will be gathering consent forms from. 13. Provide an estimate of the amount of time that will be requested from each person who participates in this research study (number of sessions, amount of time per session, and duration of period of time over which the research will take place). The time each participant will spend will vary. Some participants may agree to a single, brief interview. Others will become active participants in the research process and work with our team throughout the semester. INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES 14. Describe what you have done to make sure your subjects are fully informed about their role in the research, that their confidentiality will be maintained, and that their participation is voluntary, and that they can withdraw at any time without penalty. Include a description of how and by whom consent will be sought from subjects. Informed consent will be given in writing with subjects signing the Consent Form (see attached Consent Form). The names and identities of participants will not be anonymous or confidential. The research gathered in this study falls within the domain of expressive culture, where aesthetic elements and individual virtuosity are communally and publicly performed. Accordingly, it would be unethical to mask the names of these performers who often take great pride in what they do. We will be identifying individuals by name and image. We will clearly identify the speaker and retain record of his or her name with the material. In cases where the interviewee asks to delete information, we will respect his or her wishes according to the following guidelines: If the speaker asks that what they say remain confidential before they speak, we will stop recording; if the speaker asks that the discussion of certain topics be omitted after the interview has taken place, we will delete those entire sections on the tape and from my notes. Elon IRB Review Form for Projects Using Human Participants (rev. 6/09), page 7

15. Describe any incentives, inducements, or reimbursements (e.g. extra credit, research credit, cash payment, raffle, and gift) that will be offered to the participants. Indicate whether participants will receive the incentives if they withdraw before the study has been completed. NA CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE DATA 16. Indicate the intended use of your data. Check all that apply. Thesis Capstone Undergraduate honors project X Conferences/presentations Publication/journal article Results released to participants/parents Results released to employer or school Results released to agency or organization X Other. Describe below. We will be using the data to produce a video ethnography. This video will be shown publically and will be available online through the PERCS website. Copies of the video will be given to participating community members. 17. Describe the steps you will take to insure the confidentiality of the data. Indicate how you will safeguard data that includes identifying or potentially identifying information (e.g. coding). Indicate when identifiers will be separated or removed from the data. Please see #14 above. 18. Indicate where and how you will store the data and how long you plan to retain it. (Research proposals that involve any type of use of human subjects must be retained for 3 years.) Describe how you will dispose of it (e.g. erasure of tapes, shredding of data). Please see #14 above. This data will be made available to the community as well as the research team. It will not be disposed of. 19. Will results of this research be made available to the subjects involved? X Yes No 20. If so, how and when? Community members will be invited to a screening of the video on campus in December during exam week. Afterwards, copies of the video will be given to participating community members. Elon IRB Review Form for Projects Using Human Participants (rev. 6/09), page 8

Elon University Consent to Participate in a Research Study IRB Study # Consent Form Version Date: September 2009 Title of Study: An Ethnography of the Gaming Community in Burlington NC Principal Faculty Investigator: Dr. Tom Mould, Associate Professor of Anthropology Principal Student Investigator: Erika Lassiter Elon University Sociology/Anthropology Phone Number: Tom Mould: (336) 278-5746 Co-Investigators: Erika Lassiter (336) 675-6314 As students at Elon University, we are working towards developing an understanding of the gaming community and the traditions and values shared among its members. We will be talking to a wide range of people involved in or knowledgeable of gaming to get a broad understanding of the community and activity over the course of three months. We will be identifying you by name in the research in order to credit you for your comments, interview, and/or performance. Since the research will be archived, future researchers may quote your comments, interview and/or performance in their own studies. We do not foresee any specific risks or benefits to your participation in this study other than from the effects of publicizing your group and activities to a general audience. Your participation is voluntary and unpaid. You have the right to ask, and have answered, any questions you may have about this research. This research has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Elon University, North Carolina. If you have any questions or concerns regarding your rights as a research subject, you may contact the Chairman of the IRB, Stephen Bailey at baileys@elon.edu or 336-278- 6431. Date: Phone: Addition for Minors I represent that I am the parent and/or guardian of the minor who has signed above or is the participant in the program. I agree that we both shall be bound by this agreement. Date: Elon IRB Review Form for Projects Using Human Participants (rev. 6/09), page 9