HCC Online Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011



Similar documents
Coconino Community College Online Course Review Form

HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC

Guidelines Online Course Design Rubric Based on the Quality Matters 05/06 Rubric NMSU Teaching Academy

University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review

Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed and

GUIDE TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND QUALITY STANDARDS

Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template

As a self-evaluation tool, simply apply the quality standards in the rubric to your own course.

Teaching and Learning Standards and Principles

THE CHECK. academic. A Guide to Online Course Design. What aspects of course design does The Check address? How can The Check be used?

Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers

The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1

Shawnee Community College Quality Online Course Initiative. An institutional assessment tool to assist in the design of online courses and programs.

General Procedures for Developing an Online Course

Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS CREATION, MAINTENANCE, AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE COURSES

A tool to assist in the design, redesign, and/or evaluation of online courses.

Online Course Development Guidelines and Rubric

Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 2

UW-La Crosse Online Course Evaluation Guidelines

Cowboy Quality Online Course Evaluation (Title III) Version 3.0 Course Title Goes Here Total Score=0%

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PROCEDURES FACULTY

MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT

Community College System of New Hampshire

Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching

SVCC Exemplary Online Course Checklist

COURSE ADMINISTRATION

Best Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design

Online Course Self-Assessment Form

Course Development Resource Guide. Professional Development & Community Engagement Educational Technology Support

Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Handbook

PCC Online Quality Assurance Standards Updated 03/23/10 Version 4.5

Quality Standards for Online Learning

Best Practices in Online Teaching 2012

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

SLN Course Quality Rubric for Formal Course Review of New Online Faculty/Courses

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

Online Course Development Guide

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCE ONLINE COURSE QUALITY MANAGEMENT GUIDING PRINCIPLES

!"#$%&'()$*)"#%+,'%-"."/,&*01%% (0-%-"/*."'*01%,0/*0"%*0#$'2)$*,0% ($%$3"%40*."'#*$5%,+%6"00"##""%7%80,9.*//"%

Online and Blended Course Review

Best Practices and Review Standards for Online Instruction. Recommended Best Practices for Online Instruction

Checklist for Evaluating Online Courses

STEP ONE Work with instructor to develop/redesign course and fill out sections I VII. COURSE DEVELOPMENT or REVISION Course Information

Del Mar College, Corpus Christi, TX Department of Mathematics. Course: ID: Instructor:

Online Student Orientation

Online Course Standards Rubric

EDU Fall 2010 Course Syllabus Instructional Design for Online Learning Instructor: Faculty Bio button Contact Policy:

! Standards For Online Courses!

1. Instructional Design Elements a. Support & Resources Essential Criteria: 1. Students are provided information as to where to get technical help.

Northeastern State University Online Educator Certificate

ECU Quality Assurance Guidelines for Online Delivery

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

Online and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS. ONLINE COURSE DEVELOPMENT: CGS Standards of Good Practice INSTRUCTOR S GUIDE AY 16

Blackboard Development Checklist for Online Courses

Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA. Online Course Design Guidelines for Faculty

South Georgia State College Distance Learning Policy

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines

Hybrid course/blended Instruction an individual course in which some face-to-face instruction is replaced with distance learning.

Standards for Quality Online Courses Educational Technology Cooperative

RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses

Expectations for Classroom Setup and Online Teaching

Guide to Best Practices in Online Teaching. Online Teaching and Learning Committee Cuyamaca College. Revised November 2012

Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric

Exemplary Online Courses Michael W. Lindeman Updated: 6/10/2004

Online Teaching Procedures and Guidelines

The Art & Science of Teaching Online Syllabus

Instructor Review: Delgado Community College Standards for Online Courses. The points are to help you understand how your course will be evaluated.

Distance Education Handbook

Penn State Quality Assurance e-learning Design Standards

Teaching Guidelines for Hybrid (Blended or Mix-Modal) course and fully online course at Trinity Western University (Suggested)

Welcome to the North Carolina Virtual Public School Getting Started module. This module will take you through what online is, how to be successful in

Rubric for Online Course Design Standards

Features of the Online Course. Table of Contents. Course Interface: Overview Syllabus Navigating through the Course Content...

Instructional Design Tips

Online Instruction - Requirements and Reviewing Recommendations

Before you begin to adapt your course for online learning, consider the following questions:

HOSTOS ONLINE COURSE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

Quality Guidelines for Online Courses

Course Standards. Support Standards. Institutional and Administrative Standards

A Guide for Online Courses at The University of Virginia s College at Wise. Page 1 of 11

CN-ONLINE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STUDENT MANUAL

Shelly, G. B., & Campbell, J. T. (2012). Web design: Introductory (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Course Technology.

Center for Distance Learning and Instructional Technology. Policies, Procedures and Best Practices for the Development and Teaching of Online Courses

Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing Florida Atlantic University

Criteria for Evaluating Hybrid and Online Courses

TKT Online. Self-study Guide

D2L STUDENT MANUAL. Prepared by KAMEL SMIDA. Head of E-Learning Unit at the. Applied Medical Sciences College. Majmaah University 5/10/2014

New Mexico SUN Online Instructor Certification 2013

Categories Criteria Instructional and Audience Analysis. Prerequisites are clearly listed within the syllabus.

Distance Learning Policy With Proposed Procedures

Introduction: How does a student get started? How much time does this course require per week?

University of Houston-Victoria ONLINE COURSE INVENTORY. General Course Information

Penn State Online Faculty Competencies for Online Teaching

Transcription:

HCC Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011 Instructor s Name(s): Observer/Supervisor: Course Number: Department: College: Date: This HCC Course Evaluation Rubric is one of several data sources for evaluating the effectiveness of instruction of online courses distance education, hybrid, and web- enhanced. It can be complemented with other sources of data such as on- campus observation forms, SEOI reports, syllabi, class handouts and projects, tests, etc. Source: Quality Matters: Inter- Institutional Quality Assurance in Learning from Mary Wells, Quality Matters co- director and consultant for Maryland, 2006. The Quality Matters Rubric is owned by Maryland and is sponsored in part by the U.S. Department of Education Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. te to Users: This rubric serves as a guide to create and evaluate learner- centered online courses (model and non- model). It is also used as a component of the faculty annual PEP evaluation. When used for PEP, supervisors should write a comment following the Overall Rating for every section that they give an Exemplary, Needs Improvement, or Unsatisfactory rating. Additionally, on the last page of the rubric, supervisors should write final comments about the overall observation of the course. The Teaching & Learning Excellence (TLE) Program Supports the CCSSE Benchmarks TLE supports faculty excellence in teaching and learning to ensure student success. HCC learner- centered instruction is measured by the five *CCSSE (Community College Survey of Student Engagement) Benchmarks of Educational Practices. Student Engagement Criteria Academic Challenge Active and Collaborative Learning Student Effort Student- Faculty Interaction Support for Learners Everything HCC faculty do to build their courses is based on these benchmarks, including this annotated rubric with tips from TLE. For more information, access TLE at: http://www.hccs.edu/tle 5/3/2011

I. COURSE OVERVIEW AND ORGANIZATION General Review Standard: The overall design of the course, navigational information, as well as course, instructor, and student information are made transparent to the student at the beginning of the course. Done 1. Layout of your content items and your instructions make the organization of the course easy to understand. For example, the items at the top of the course and in each section are organized in a logical and easy-to-follow sequence. 2. Introduce the student to the course (In the top label, provide course title, CRN#, and a statement.) 3. An appropriate method of welcoming students is used. (May be incorporated into other items or stand alone.) 4. Students are informed of the structure of the course content so they know what they have to do to learn. (Check that the required HCC learner-centered syllabus template is used.) 5. The self-introduction by the instructor is appropriate. (Includes a professional biography in the course.) 6. Students are requested to introduce themselves to the class. 7. State minimum course requirements clearly for technology, and student knowledge and skills (entry level for the course.) If applicable, state the prerequisites. Exemplary Needs Improvement t Applicable Professional Performance Unsatisfactory Additional and Recommendation 1. A session agenda on the board lets students know 1. Number the order & clearly word titles of all links what is coming up and helps to end with a review. listed in the course for clear organization. 2. You have two places for the course title: The Moodle 2. Cover What s in it for me? (WIIFM) home page and in the course. 3. Use activities to begin the course. Activities can 3. Design a visually friendly, well-organized course. Use build the community and relate student experience your photo in your own profile to be present to the course objectives. whenever students email you. 4. A syllabus can help students prepare to learn by including discussion to address study skills and generate student confidence. 5. Make introductions part of an activity. (How will you introduce yourself to your students?) 6. Use ice-breakers to prompt student interaction and build a learning community.* 7. Use groups for peer teaching to recall and bring students up to speed.* Start in class and continue online with individual or group forum posts. * See TLE course TL2075 Improving Student Learning through Active Engagement. 4. Post a learner-centered syllabus (required.) Place objectives and tasks on the course page (no clicks and highly visible). Create an avatar (with text equivalent) to let students know what to do. 5. Your professional biography describes your qualifications. Your course appearance (organization and all visuals you may select) also tell about you. 6. Have students edit their course profiles. Use a discussion forum for a student introduction activity. 7. Besides a syllabus to state minimums and pre-req s, you can use an online tools to assess entry skills/knowledge, or bring students up to speed through query/teach methods. 2

II. LEARNING OBJECTIVES (COMPETENCIES) General Review Standard: Learning objectives are clearly defined and explained. They assist the student to focus on learning activities. Done 1. The learning objectives of the course describe outcomes that are measurable. 2. The learning objectives of the course are clearly stated and understandable to the student. 3. The learning objectives address content mastery, critical thinking skills, and core learning skills. 4. Instructions to students on how to meet the learning objectives are adequate and easy to understand. 5. The learning objectives of the course are articulated and specified on the module/unit level. Exemplary Needs Improvement t Applicable Professional Performance Unsatisfactory Additional and Recommendations: 1. Learning objectives are written in the syllabus, but are also communicated in the objective-based activities, such as a graded (measured) critical debate.* 2. Make sure learners know why they are doing an activity. Have learner ask questions (Round Robin*) to tie objectives to activities/lecture. 3. Instead of using only lecture, include peer teaching and faculty-student interaction in activities to prompt content mastery and critical thinking skills per objectives. 4. Writing instructions on the board ahead of time helps when reviewing them. Include the WIIFM tie it to the outcome. (WIIFM is What s in it for me. ) 5. Besides in the syllabus, discuss session objectives before and after the lesson activities. Students need to tie activities to outcomes. * See TLE course TL2075 Improving Student Learning through Active Engagement. 1. Generate measurable graded activities using tools like forums for peer-to-peer and faculty-to-student interaction to research topics. 2. The nature of online environments makes it possible to engage students by presenting clear objectives for the course and for lessons using avatars and other visual, kinesthetic and auditory methods. 3. Use the activity tools to develop content mastery. Pose issues in Q&A Advanced Forum and journal entries to encourage discussion and reflective thinking. These can allow more time for learners to reflect and respond online. 4. Instructions for many activities can include a rubric on how the objective is met and steps to complete it successfully, giving some learners confidence. 5. Learning objectives can be clearly stated on the course page (no clicking needed) where they are located in the lessons. 3

III. ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT General Review Standard: Assessment strategies use established ways to measure effective learning, assess student progress by reference to stated Done learning objectives, and are designed to be essential to the learning process. 1. The types of assessments selected measure the stated learning objectives and are consistent with course activities and resources. 2. The grading policy is transparent and easy to understand. 3. Assessment and measurement strategies provide feedback to the student. 4. The types of assessments selected and the methods used for submitting assessments are appropriate for the online environment. 5. Self-check or practice types of assignments are provided for quick student feedback. Exemplary Needs Improvement t Applicable Professional Performance Unsatisfactory Additional and Recommendations: 1. Determine how you will assess fulfillment of the objectives. The assessment formats should closely match the skills, knowledge and attitudes stated in the objectives. Determine if the assessment is delivered F2F or online. 2. Besides the syllabus, grading rubrics for assignments describe how students will be assessed in both F2F and online activities, giving your learners confidence that they have fulfilled the course requirements. (Can they take part in building rubric components in your course?) 3. Feedback takes time, so you can give feedback online for F2F activities & assessments. Discuss what was missed and why. Include study skills, if appropriate. 4. The in-class test has security advantages. However, the online tests offer other advantages, such as allowing more time privately, automatic grading, and a variety of assessment formats that match the objectives. 5. Activities in class can prepare for online tests. Meet the CCSSE Active & Collaborative Learning benchmark by using group review activities. * See TLE course TL2075 Improving Student Learning Through Active Engagement. 1. There are a variety of tools that can be used as graded tests to match the learning objectives and student learning outcomes. 2. The syllabus with the grading policy can always be available online. 3. Students can see their grades and your feedback. Course email and tools with built-in feedback are available to interact with students to discuss performance. Use discussion forums for feedback. 4. Besides using the Quiz tool, there are other graded online tools that serve as assessment, including Respondus Lockdown Browser. 5. tests (quizzes) can be non-graded. You can set up rich instant feedback. Consider posting discussion about practice quiz questions in the Advanced Q&A Forum. 4

IV. RESOURCES AND COURSE MATERIALS General Review Standard: Instructional materials are sufficiently comprehensive to achieve announced objectives and learning outcomes and are prepared by qualified persons competent in their fields. (Materials, other than standard textbooks produced by recognized publishers, are prepared by the instructor or other educators skilled in preparing materials for online learning.) 1. The instructional materials support the stated learning objectives and have sufficient breadth and depth for the student to learn the subject. 2. The instructional materials include instructor s notes in addition to links, the publisher s website, quizzes, etc. 3. Instructional materials are presented in a format appropriate to the online environment, and are easily accessible to and usable by the student. 4. The purpose of the course elements (content, instructional methods, technologies, and course materials) is evident. 5. The instructional materials, including supporting materials (such as manuals, videos, CD ROMs, and computer software) are consistent in organization. 6. All resources and materials used in the online course are appropriately cited. An image of the required materials is recommended. Done Exemplary Needs Improvement t Applicable Professional Performance Unsatisfactory Additional and Recommendations: 1. Use short activities* that get increasingly deep or 1. Offer graduated activities that appeal to initial broad. Use collaboration for peer-to-peer teaching levels of understanding and learner styles. Sendto take place and continue online. A-Problem * can be started online and finished in class. 2. 2. tools support instructor notes and web links. 3. If online files are to be printed, make sure they are in print quality and conserve printer ink or consider a printable version. Make sure handouts are online (ADA compliant). 4. Use activities* for student discussion of course content so they are aware of the purpose. 5. Plan your course content design to achieve consistency. 6. Give students the responsibility to cite sources in their preparation for class activities, such as a case study*. * See TLE course TL2075 Improving Student Learning through Active Engagement. Uphold copyright laws. 3. Consider when long files can be broken into digestible chunks of information with illustrations while also considering readers and other ADA compliance. 4. Consider using a forum to discuss the importance of content and applications to their lives. 5. The layout and tools of Eagle support consistency. Plan to use them for design consistency. 6. While all of your materials are cited and images are used, let your students build a database or glossary, citing resources and using appropriate images, such as those used in their fields. 5

V. LEARNER INTERACTION General Review Standard: The effective design of instructor-student interaction, meaningful student cooperation, and student-content interaction is essential to student motivation, intellectual commitment, and personal development. Done 1. The learning activities promote the achievement of stated objectives and learning outcomes. 2. Learning activities foster instructor-student interaction, content-student interaction, and, if appropriate to this course, student-student interaction. 3. Netiquette expectations with regard to discussions and email communication are clearly stated; the instructor s tone is respectful. 4. Clear standards are set for instructor response and availability (turnaround time for email, grades posted etc.). For example, the instructor should respond to Eagle mail and other questions within two business days. 5. The requirements for course interaction are clearly articulated. 6. The course design prompts the instructor to be present, active, and engaged with the students. Exemplary Needs Improvement t Applicable Professional Performance Unsatisfactory Additional and Recommendations: 1. Plan objective-based activities* for real-time collaboration/discussion, such as a critical debate*. Start and end in class. Allow prep time online. 2. Use content-related interactive activities* to begin, divide and end lecture content. Activities promote learner-centered discussion/discovery. 3. Your interaction sets the class tone. Over 90% of communication is non-verbal. Calling students by name, your energy, eye contact and facial expressions are methods to involve students. 4. Office hours are in the syllabus and are also discussed. Elicit from students general thoughts on using office hours to talk with the instructor. Ask what kinds of questions they might ask. 5. In a creative short activity*, generate a rubric with students for grading classroom interaction. Post the rubric online. 6. Exchange long lectures for integrated activities that use instructor-student and student-student interaction for inquiry, role-play, or other formats*. * See TLE course TL2075 Improving Student Learning Through Active Engagement. 1. For portions of activities online, use the capabilities to group students; generate forums, databases, glossaries and mind maps; and link to websites for interaction with visual tools. 2. Begin or end an activity* online using group capability in Eagle. This allows time for all students to contribute to their role in the activity. 3. The instructor s online presence in emails, messages, notes, postings and instructions to students are opportunities to model professional respect as a skill set for students. 4. Let students know how they can reach you online and when to expect your reply. Have an email or forum post waiting when students start class to establish being present and begin interaction. 5. Using a forum as a group assignment, let students submit rubrics for online interaction. Discuss the rubrics in a class activity, determining a final rubric. 6. Use forums (graded or ungraded) to ask meaningful questions and respond to student replies, including follow-up queries on individual student levels of understanding that elicit higher level thinking. 6

VI. COURSE TECHNOLOGY General Review Standard: To enhance student learning, course technology should enrich instruction and foster learner interactivity 1. The tools and media support the learning objectives of the course and are integrated with texts and lesson assignments. 2. The tools and media enhance student interactivity and guide the student to become a more active learner. 3. Technologies required for this course are either provided or easily downloadable. 4. The tools and media are compatible with existing standards of delivery modes. 5. Instructions on how to access online resources are sufficient and easy to understand. 6. Course technologies take advantage of existing economies and efficiencies of delivery. / Exemplary Needs Improvement t Applicable Professional Performance Unsatisfactory Additional and Recommendations: 1. Plan activities* each session that elicit student responses about the learning objectives in the content. 2. F2F allows the learners to interact in physical groups or pairs, with the instructor available for timely feedback. 3. The online portion serves the face-to-face as a repository for handouts, media, and publisher packs. * See TLE course TL2075 Improving Student Learning Through Active Engagement. 1. The discussion started in class can continue online using tools to produce an end product or project. 2. Start or end activities online, maintaining a flow to the course and continuity to the learning community. 3. The online tools available for free to the students within the course, as well as free internet tools and content support student learning through activities and discovery. 7

VII. LEARNER SUPPORT General Review Standard: Courses are effectively supported for students through fully accessible modes of delivery, resources, and student support. 1. The course instructions articulate or link to a clear description of the technical support offered. 2. Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the institution's academic support system can assist the student in effectively using the resources provided. 3. Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the institution's student support services can assist the student in effectively using the resources provided. 4. Course instructions articulate or link to tutorials and resources that answer basic questions related to research, writing, technology, etc. / Exemplary Needs Improvement t Applicable Professional Performance Unsatisfactory Additional and Recommendations: (The table below refers to the rubric items above.) Cover information about tutors, libraries, ADA information of learner support is located in support and classroom course instructions in the multiple locations: syllabus; menu bar links to syllabus. Have the HCC Librarian visit to explain the Helpdesk; HCCS Student, DE Orientation, and Distance library, the online library and the databases Education as well as Teaching & Learning Resources available to the students. (This is the fifth CCSSE websites. Add the HCC Empower Library Module in your benchmark Support the Learners.) course. 8

VIII. ACCESSIBILITY General Review Standard: The course is accessible to all students. / 1. The course acknowledges the importance of ADA requirements. 2. Web pages provide equivalent alternatives to auditory and visual content. 3. Web pages have links that are self-describing and meaningful. All the images should be tagged. 4. The course demonstrates sensitivity to readability issues. For example, avoid long scrolling text and red or other bright colors. Exemplary Needs Improvement t Applicable Professional Performance Unsatisfactory Additional and Recommendations: (The table below refers to the rubric items above.) Assure that the syllabus and handouts are available online and comply with ADA required and suggested guidelines.* HCC Eagle supports ADA compliance. Use college resources* to make sure that content is ADA accessible. (* See the Teaching & Learning Resources course, ET1480 Accessible Instructional Materials.) 9

Final comments about the course as a whole and its potential to promote student learning (add a page if necessary): Supervisor/Reviewer s Signature: Date: Print Name: Instructor's Signature: (For PEP only) Date: Print Name: 10