Convergence of Wholesale And Retail Markets: The Texas Experience

Similar documents
How To Manage The Ercot Grid

ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (March 2014) ERCOT Public April 15, 2014

Market Design 2009: The Texas Deregulated Electricity Market. September 17, 2009 Commissioner Donna L. Nelson Public Utility Commission of Texas, USA

Texas Demand Response Programs Cirro Energy Services an NRG Energy Company

Energy in the Wholesale Market December 5, :30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Irving, Texas Robert Burke, Principal Analyst ISO New England

Managing Electrical Demand through Difficult Periods: California s Experience with Demand Response

Benefits of AMI/HAN for Retail Electric Providers Glen Stancil VP, Retail Planning and Development

Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Interconnection

Control Number : Item Number: 36. Addendum StartPage : 0

Demand Response in Capacity and Electricity Markets: What Role Can and Should It Play?

Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Programs in the United States

Update on Texas Restructuring. NAESB Conference September 24, 2002 Baltimore, MD Chairman, Rebecca Klein

Industries Association. ERCOT Successes and Challenges

The Market Guide. An introductory guide to how the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) facilitates the competitive power market

Net Energy Metering and the Future of Distributed Generation

Grid Operations and Planning

Austin Energy Quarterly Report. Austin Energy. April 26, Mission: Deliver clean, affordable, reliable energy and excellent customer service.

Retail Choice In Electricity Markets

Moving Towards the Smart Grid. Southern California Edison s Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Program

Optimizing Wind Generation in ERCOT Nodal Market Resmi Surendran ERCOT Chien-Ning Yu ABB/Ventyx Hailong Hui ERCOT

ConnectivityWeek 2010

Overview of Long Island Electric Service Territory

Using Demand Response Programs to Benefit the. PtikJ Patrick J. Oshie, Ohi Commissioner Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission

PJM LMP Market Overview

EMERGING SOLAR STRATEGIES

Feeding 10 Billion Aquaenevores and Infovores on a 1 4 Degrees Warmer Planet

Enabling 24/7 Automated Demand Response and the Smart Grid using Dynamic Forward Price Offers

ERCOT EWTG Tracking Excess Generation from DG solar PV (and related data) Larry Howe Texas Solar Energy Society Board Member Jan 2015

CenterPoint Energy Robert B. Frazier Director of Electric Technology

Customer Service Business Unit Tariff Programs & Services. Leading the Way in Electricity TM

Retail Competition in Texas: A Success Story

Solar Panels and the Smart Grid

ATCAVE Expo February 29, 2012

U.S. Policies to Reduce the Impact of Energy Use on the Environment Trends and Implications

Smart Storage and Control Electric Water Heaters. Greg Flege, Supervisor, Load Management Midwest Rural Energy Conference March 3, 2011

Overview and Comparison of Demand Response Programs in North American Electricity Markets

The Smart Energy Pricing Evolution at BGE

Sanjeev Choudhary SunEdison Advanced Solutions

High Penetration of Distributed Solar PV Generation

Competitive Electricity Procurement

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Concepts and Experiences with Capacity Mechanisms

Cyber Infrastructure for the Smart Grid

Electricity Prices Panel

Energy Efficiency as a Resource in Texas

Net Metering Summary Within Northeast Utilities

Energy Storage Systems and Role for the US Grid

NESEMC Top Solar Policies

PG&E and Renewable Energy. Chuck Hornbrook Senior Manager Solar and Customer Generation

NEW COMMERCIAL Rates. Understanding the. Commercial Customers

Texas transformed. Achieving significant savings through a new electricity market management system

Distributed Energy Resource Options and The Importance of The Electric Power Grid

STEM OFFERINGS. Industries, LLC

Demand Response, Dynamic Pricing, and the Smart Grid in New York

Andres Carvallo CMG Founder & CEO Co-Author of The Advanced Smart Grid Former Austin Energy CIO ( )

Modeling Demand Response for Integration Studies

Energy Management. Electric Procurement Strategies. August 27, 2007

The Materials Contained Are Property of GP Renewables & Trading, LLC and are considered proprietary. This is not for distribution.

Attached are the Board materials in relation to these agenda items. Item ERCOT Public

Increasing Demand Response in Maine

NEVADA S ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM AND THE CLEAN POWER PLAN

Distributed Energy Resource Services and Pricing Caltech Resnick Ins;tute Grid 2020 Seminar

Closing the Gap Between Wholesale and Retail

PJM Overview and Wholesale Power Markets. John Gdowik PJM Member Relations

Electricity Costs White Paper

Demand Response Management System ABB Smart Grid solution for demand response programs, distributed energy management and commercial operations

Wind Turbine Manufacturers. Renewables Advocates. Retail Customers. Wind Project Generators. Gas, Nuclear and other Generators. Electric Utilities

Trends in prices to commercial energy consumers in the competitive Texas electricity market $

In Texas, you have a. in retail electric providers (REP s).

Experience in Electricity Market Restructuring. Texas: Mostly Good. Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates And University of Texas at Austin.

Integrating Energy Efficiency and Demand Response for Commercial Customers. EnerNOC Inc.

Electricity Procurement. Budget, Finance and Audit Committee June 15, 2015

The Hidden Daytime Price Of Electricity BY EVAN BERGER

Demand Response Management System Smart systems for Consumer engagement By Vikram Gandotra Siemens Smart Grid

Workshop B. 11:15 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

Kit Carson Electric Solar Program Presented to: Science, Technology and Telecommunications Committee July th 2010 Presented By: Luis Reyes, CEO

Energy Storage: Utility View. NARUC Winter Conference February 15, 2009

SOLAR PURCHASE POWER AGREEMENT (PPA) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. UPDATED: October 28, 2015

Winter Impacts of Energy Efficiency In New England

Ubiquitous Computing in Business Processes Part V

What is hourly pricing and what does it mean for you? Customer Meetings May 2006

Commercial and Industrial Rate Classes Comparisons Final Report

San Antonio Energy Efficiency Potential: Preliminary Assessment

Item 8.1: Third Quarter 2013KPIs Update

4. Comparison with DECC (2014) Estimated impacts of energy and climate change policies on energy prices and bills

Calculating the Business Case for Demand Response

FACT SHEET. NEM fast facts:

Digital Metering: a key enabling factor to foster RES development

Transmission Pricing. Donald Hertzmark July 2008

PECO Default Service Program - RFP Data Room Data Series Overview: General Descriptions and Assumptions February 13, 2015

REPORT ON EFFORTS TO REDUCE ELECTRIC PEAK DEMAND

Solar Resource Measurement Importance. Wil Grady P.E. Southern California Edison Power Supply NREL PV Solar Resource Workshop Denver 2015

What is the Impact of Utility Demand Charges on a DCFC Host?

Village of Bensenville Electric Aggregation Program

RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT STATE TAX POLICIES AND INCENTIVES IMPACTING

Security of electricity supply

City of Momence Electric Aggregation Renewal

Western Australia and the Northern Territory are not connected to the NEM, primarily due to the distance between networks.

ERCOT Texas s Competitive Power Experience: A View from the Outside Looking In

The Role of State Commissions in Demand Response and Shared Savings

Transcription:

Convergence of Wholesale And Retail Markets: The Texas Experience 1 COMMISSIONER KENNETH W. ANDERSON, JR. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS PRESENTATION FOR HARVARD ELECTRICITY POLICY GROUP JUNE 12, 2014

ERCOT s Footprint ERCOT is NOT synchronously interconnected to any other grid; only connected through 5 DC ties ranging from 36 MW to 600 MW capacity and totaling 1,106 MW. There are two additional ties of 1,500 MW and 3,000 MW under development for up to an additional 4,500 MW. ERCOT Region - $32B electric market that covers 75% of Texas land region and 85% of the state s load. 2 ERCOT has 41,500+ miles of transmission lines. Loads pay for the transmission system (including all additions) based on a pro rata share of coincident peak load. Peak load 68,305 MW on August 3, 2011. Total number of generating units: 550+.

ERCOT s Footprint (cont d) Total market participants: 1,100+ Total Qualified Scheduling Entities (QSE): 402 as of the end of May 2014, with 104 representing neither load nor generation, 170 representing load, 82 representing generation and 46 representing both load and generation. Three QSEs represent distributed generation (DG) as emergency response service (ERS) generators. Total generation for 2013: 331 million MWh 73% competitive. 16% municipalities. 12% cooperatives. 3 98% of energy is settled in 15 minute intervals through data from AMI or IDR meters (as of May 31, 2014). As of June 1, 2014 loads can bid into SCED. None as of yet (expect 3 QSEs to begin bidding their load into SCED later this month).

ERCOT Wholesale and Retail Markets Designed To Operate As A Unified Whole 4 The Texas electricity wholesale and retail markets were designed at the onset as a unified whole to support the development of efficient markets in each. Texas wholesale market was designed in conjunction with its retail market, with an array of policies put in place to ensure that market participants would have access to systems and facilities needed to participate in the market. Three aspects of the market design tied to unbundling and divestiture, transmission access and cost-allocation, and market administration are notable in this regard. Texas designed its power market with the customer as its focal point Customer choice is considered both a right and responsibility, in ways more akin to the expectations of customers in other types of markets than in traditional electric service arrangements provided by monopoly utility companies. - Susan F. Tierney, Ph. D. ERCOT Texas Competitive Power Experience: A View from the Outside Looking In, October 2008.

The Texas Approach to Markets In Texas, ERCOT has both wholesale and retail responsibilities. System reliability planning and operations. Open access to transmission. Wholesale Schedules and dispatches. Manage both real time and day ahead markets. $11.2 billion (2013) real time market $11.3 billion (2013) day ahead market $505 million (May 2013-Apr 2014) congestion revenue rights Retail Manages switching customers between retail electric providers (REPs). Handles billing. Meter reads come in to ERCOT. ERCOT provides customers usage data to the respective REP. 5

ERCOT s Distributed Generation And Cogeneration 4.7 GW currently is expected to be available to ERCOT from Private Use Networks (PUN) when system conditions indicate scarcity. As new system wide offer cap and operating reserve demand curve create prices as high as $9,000/MWh, ERCOT expects to see this figure climb. ERS traditionally was a DR product, however ERCOT now has several providers of DG which participate in ERS by bidding in generation. 6 In ERCOT, 10 MW or greater generation has to register as wholesale, less than 10 MW doesn t. DG providers can tie into the grid at the distribution or transmission level and be designated a Small Generator if less than 10 MW is connected at a particular location. For example, one DG provider distributes small packages (each about 9.5 MW) of DG around the state, effectively aggregating over 150 MW of DG. The aggregated total is then bid into ERS - Generation participating in what traditionally has been a load based service.

ERCOT s Demand Response 7 Two sub-categories of DR ERS and Load Response Service are loads procured and deployable by ERCOT as emergency reserves and an ancillary service. Price responsive DR Pure market driven activity: currently loads managing their consumption to arbitrage market price differences, manage high prices and, where applicable, transmission cost allocation. Ultimate goal: retail customers actively and transparently participating in the market through bidding their load into SCED. In their June 2012 report, Brattle estimated there was at least 1,700 MW of load that responded to scarcity pricing during Texas August 2011 extreme weather event. In a recent 2014 report, Brattle projects that DR could grow an additional 2,300 MW to 3,800 MW. (Exploring Natural Gas and Renewables in ERCOT, June 3, 2014) Example of Price Responsive Demand Response (Snapshot from June 2013) 156,000 total retail customers enrolled, including: 117,000 Time of Use 4,100 Real-Time Pricing 23,000 Block & Index 1,900 Peak Rebate 10,000 Other Direct Load Control

Examples of DR Programs Offered in ERCOT Two examples of REP programs : 8 City Public Service (CPS - San Antonio s municipal utility) DR program 50kw load (can be aggregated), CPS s goal is to have 771 MW available for curtailment by 2020. REP Reliant Energy s NEST thermostat program (2 year sign up), and Reliant Energy is now offering $0.80/kwh without regard to customers current plan, the only requirement is a smart thermostat. What effect will these types of programs have?

Where Does DG End and DR Begin? 9 What happens if a micro gas turbine becomes cost effective for individual consumers? For example, the following scenario is not inconceivable: What if a REP were to lease micro generators to their customers, with the control technology to start the micro generators remotely, in exchange for volumetric payments to the customers? Has the REP effectively become a generator? Is this the complete circle of convergence of the markets when the retail (including residential) consumer becomes a wholesaler of system resources? If so, will retail customers still need REPs? Will retail customers have to register as a REP or QSE or both? (I can guarantee that ERCOT doesn t need 6 million REPs or QSEs.) What would be the effect on the transmission and distribution system and the current cost recovery methodology?

Contact Information 10 Kenneth W. Anderson, Jr. 512-936-7005 kenneth.anderson@puc.texas.gov