Exhibit SHN-029. Commission Mandatory Hearing SHINE Construction Permit Application Environmental Overview December 15, 2015



Similar documents
USDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

How To License A Nuclear Plant

Environmental Impact Assessment

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment

CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. PORT OF OSWEGO AUTHORITY Lead Agency, State Environmental Quality Review Act

Department of the Interior. Departmental Manual

RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION

ODOT NEPA Assignment Training Plan Prepared by Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Environmental Services Last Updated: 12/17/15

The Terms of reference (ToR) for conducting Rapid EIA study for the proposed project is described below:

For additional information on qualifications and experience of representative EDGE senior staff members, please contact us.

GAO PIPELINE PERMITTING. Interstate and Intrastate Natural Gas Permitting Processes Include Multiple Steps, and Time Frames Vary

1 INTRODUCTION. Kayenta Complex Page 9 December 2011 Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessment

Foreign Affairs Security Training Center (FASTC) U.S. General Services Administration U.S. Department of State

FWS Cultural Resource Management Planning

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR SCOPING OF EIA STUDY

Revision of Land and Resource Management Plan for the Santa Fe National Forest;

How To Decide If A Dam Removal Is Safe For Water Quality

Chapter 8. List of Preparers

NASA Stennis Space Center Environmental Resources Document

Chapter 3 Design of Structures, Systems, and Components CONTENTS

2008 Compensatory Mitigation Rule: Overview and Highlights. Jenny Thomas U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Division July 2014

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODS

List of Preparers AKRF, INC. Robert F. Conway, P.E. EIS Project Manager; Construction Impacts

33 CFR PART 332 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION FOR LOSSES OF AQUATIC RESOURCES. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq. ; 33 U.S.C. 1344; and Pub. L

PROPOSED REHABILITATION SAN CARLOS IRRIGATION PROJECT FACILITIES. Pinal County, Arizona. Scoping Information and Opportunity to Comment

SECTION 9 SUMMARY OF COORDINATION, PUBLIC VIEWS AND COMMENTS

ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MEDFORD DISTRICT GRANTS PASS FIELD OFFICE 2164 NE Spalding Ave Grants Pass, OR 97526

Sec. 22a-1a page 1 (4-97)

United States Depmiment of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Western Colorado Area Office Grand Junction, Colorado

Estabrook Dam A Discussion of Alternatives. Public Scoping Meeting June 5, 2014

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

May 9, Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Power Fire Restoration Project (CEQ# )

Amherst County Public Schools. AP Environmental Science Curriculum Pacing Guide. College Board AP Environmental Science Site

AIR TRAFFIC INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

Karuk Tribe Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge within Natural Resource Management

WYOMING STATE PROTOCOL APPENDIX I GLOSSARY

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

J. Template Environmental Checklist for FEMA/HUD Using the Template Environmental Checklist for FEMA and HUD Responsible Entities EHP Reviews

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 131 FERC 62,175 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. United Water Conservation District Project No.

APPENDIX C LIST OF EA RECIPIENTS

Chapter 11. List of Preparers/Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Forms

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES/SCIENCE What can I do with this degree?

Developing and Maintaining Your Airport Property Map Lessons from St. Louis

121 FERC 62,167 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Utility District No. 1 of Project No Chelan County

National Retardant NEPA USFWS Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Tracking Sheet

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

MATERIALS LICENSE. Docket or Reference Number Maximum Amount that Licensee May Possess at Any One Time Under This License: Source

NYCIDA PROJECT COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS June 5, 2014

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

Chapter 9. Selected Watershed Initiatives in the Great Basin Region

PUBLIC LAW DEC. 15, 1997 MICHIGAN INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ACT

Environmental Compliance Questionnaire for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Financial Assistance Applicants

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

SAWTOOTH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA AND JERRY PEAK WILDERNESS ADDITIONS ACT

PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT: Trans Bay Cable Maintenance Project

Licensing a Repository at Yucca Mountain

TOR for Synthetic Organic Chemicals ToR for EIA studies in respect of the synthetic organic chemicals industry may include, but not limited to the

Department of Defense MANUAL

Transcription:

Exhibit SHN-029 Commission Mandatory Hearing SHINE Construction Permit Application Environmental Overview December 15, 2015

Development of the Environmental Report Began work October 2011 SHINE production facility will be located in Janesville, Rock County Wisconsin County, Environmental Report follows the Final Interim Staff Guidance A Augmenting ti NUREG-1537 NUREG 1537 2

Structure and Content of the Environmental Report Chapter Contents 19.1 Introduction Purpose and need for the proposed action, Regulatory provisions, permits and required consultations 19.2 Proposed Action Site location and layout, Radioisotope facility description, Water consumption and treatment, Cooling and heating dissipation systems, Waste systems, Storage, treatment t t and transportation t ti of radioactive and nonradioactive materials, including LEU, waste, radioisotopes and any other materials 19.3 Description of the Affected Environment 19.4 Impacts of the Proposed Construction, Operations, and Decommissioning Land use and visual resources, Air quality and noise, Geologic environment, Water resources, Ecological resources, Historic and cultural resources, Socioeconomics, Human health Land use and visual resources, Air quality and noise, Geologic environment, Water resources, Ecological resources, Historic and cultural resources, Socioeconomics, Human health, Waste management, Transportation, Postulated accidents, Environmental justice, Cumulative effects 19.5 Alternatives No-action alternative, Reasonable alternatives, Cost-benefit of the alternatives, Comparison of potential environmental impacts 19.6 Conclusions Unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, Relationship between short-term uses and long-term productivity of the environment, Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources 3

Scope of Field Investigations Phase I Environmental Site Assessment General G l Reconnaissance R i Soil Borings/Geotechnical Investigation Well Installation Phase I Archaeological Investigation Baseline Visual Assessment Wetland W tl d Delineation D li ti Quarterly Ecological Investigations Aquatic Ecology Terrestrial Ecology Monthly Water Resources Water Quality Water Levels 4

Context for Data Acquisition Site 91.27 91 27 acre parcel located on the south side of the City of Janesville in Rock County, WI Project Area Circular area with a radius approximately 1 mile from the site center point Region Circular area with a radius of 5 miles from the site center point Larger context as appropriate (e.g., geology, air quality) Region of Influence Rock R kc County t 5

Consultations City of Janesville Rock County Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Wisconsin State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Wisconsin i Department t of Transportation ti U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Aviation Administration Bureau of Indian Affairs Native American Tribes (13): Wisconsin Tribes: Forest County Potawatomi Community, Wisconsin Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin Non-Wisconsin Tribes: 11 Tribal Entities 6

Alternative Sites Construction Impacts SHINE (Janesville) Chippewa Falls Stevens Point No-Action MODERATE impacts to Visual Resources, Noise and Transportation MODERATE impacts to Land Use, Visual Resources, Noise, Ground Water, and Transportation Construction Benefits 420 jobs; $635,000 annual 420 jobs; $635,000 annual 420 jobs; $635,000 annual None Operation Impacts Operation Benefits source of fdiagnostic source of fdiagnostic source of fdiagnostic isotopes: Mo-99, isotopes: Mo-99, isotopes: Mo-99, I-131, Xe-133; I-131, Xe-133; I-131, Xe-133; $660,000 annual $660,000 annual $660,000 annual None 7

Alternative Technologies SHINE Technology Linear Accelerator Technology Low-Enriched Uranium Aqueous Homogenous Reactor No-Action Construction Impacts Construction Benefits 420 jobs; $635,000 420 jobs; $635,000 420 jobs; $635,000 annual annual annual None Operation Impacts Operation Benefits source of fdiagnostic isotopes: Mo-99, I-131, Xe-133; $660,000 annual source of fmo-99; $660,000 annual source of fdiagnostic isotopes: Mo-99, I- 131, Xe-133; $660,000 annual None 8

NRC Environmental Site Audit July 30 August 1, 1 2013 SHINE presentations on the production process and alternative site selection process Janesville site visit Walk down of proposed site Driving D i i ttour Rock River visit Sampling sites 1 and 2 along the unnamed tributary to the Rock River Tour of the Janesville Wastewater Treatment Facility Alternative site visits: Stevens Point Chippewa Falls Responded to NRC Site Audit Information N d Needs 9

SHINE and The Community SHINE believes the relationships between the company, Janesville, and Wisconsin are important SHINE favors a policy of transparency with our community SHINE s actions support these principles Participation in four public meetings per year (two SHINE hosted, two for city council) SHINE management involvement in community activities Regular discussions with city leadership to coordinate plans Regular updates provided to State of Wisconsin These activities have fostered a relationship of trust and enthusiasm for the project 10

Conclusions The SHINE environmental review was conducted pursuant to 10 CFR Part 51 and is adequate The requirements of Sections 102(2) (A), (C), and (E) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) have been satisfied SHINE s weighing g and balancing of the environmental, technical, and other costs and benefits of the SHINE facility supports issuance of the construction permit 11