B.3.3 Modern Period (1930-1960)



Similar documents
3901 Calverton Boulevard Beltsville, Maryland

STATE OF ILLINOIS. Issued by. Department of Registration and Education. NOBLE J. PUFFER, Director. State Water Survey Division

A Booming Economy 20.1

2010 MWCOG Electricity Consumption by Jurisdiction

MIRAMONTE FOREST APARTMENTS 25 Howland Road Asheville, NC 28804

Market Rate Rental Housing

Flickr: Randy Pertiet. Baltimore s Inner Harbor: Economic Impact, Importance, and Opportunities for Investment October 31, 2013

Maryland Invests $845 Million in New Highway and Bridge Projects

COMMUNITY INFORMATION FOR MARYLAND, DC, AND VIRGINIA Commuter Student Involvement 0110 Stamp Student Union (301)

Philadelphia County. Land Use and Growth Management Profile

MARC L. PUSHKIN Pushkin & Pushkin, Inc. 30 East Padonia Road, Suite 406 Timonium, Maryland mlpushkin@pushkinandpushkin.com

Washington Adventist Hospital:

Chapter 54. Real Property Management INTRODUCTION

Multifamily Market Commentary July 2014 The Nation s Aging Multifamily Housing Stock

ADMINISTRATIVE RELEASE. Maryland Income Tax. Administrative Release No. 21

Presentation to Knox County Commission Monday, February 23, 2015

A Comparison Study of Real Estate Tax Closing Costs in Maryland, Northern Virginia, and Washington, D.C.

Roads. Nebraska railroad crossing, 1920s. Copyright National Council on Economic Education. Photo: Nebraska Department of Roads

What Will Drive Growth in the Washington Area Economy Going Forward?

Market Analysis Retail Housing Office [CITY OF BERLIN MARKET ANALYSIS] City of Berlin, Wisconsin

OFFICE MARKET ANALYSIS SUBURBAN CHICAGO. According to Costar Property, the Suburban Chicago office market is distributed as follows:

IV. Market Analysis. A. Executive Summary. The Economy. The Site

Prince Georges Volunteer Center

Virginia Motorcycle Accident Attorney

Do Tax Increases in New York City Cause a Loss of Jobs? A Review of the Evidence

TEKS 6(F), 8(A), 14(B), 22(A), 22(B), 22(C), 22(D), 23(A), 24(F), 24(H), 25(D)

AVALON PARK WEST (FORMERLY NEW RIVER) PD/MPUD- NARRATIVE FOR DRI RESCISSION, PD SUBAREA AMENDMENT AND MPUD SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION.

SECTION ONE CHAPTER 2: A LAND USE PROFILE OF MANCHESTER

Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD

Smart Growth Illustrated: Developer s Guidebook. City of Bentonville Community Development Department October 2006

LEWES DISTRICT AND SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY LEWES DISTRICT JOINT CORE STRATEGY INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION

Housing: Before, During, And After The Great Recession

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. May 29, 2012 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Midland FS&LA Charter Number

Between 1986 and 2010, homeowners and renters. A comparison of 25 years of consumer expenditures by homeowners and renters.

Washington in the 60s Discussion Guide

U.S. Small Business Administration Washington Metropolitan Area District

MARC L. PUSHKIN Pushkin & Pushkin, Inc. 30 East Padonia Road, Suite 406 Timonium, Maryland mlpushkin@pushkinandpushkin.com

IS PLEASED TO PRESENT FOR SALE THE GATES OF CIPRIANO, A 591-UNIT GARDEN-STYLE APARTMENT COMMUNITY LOCATED IN GREENBELT, MD DELAWARE

Market Segmentation: The Omaha Condominium Market

Market Analysis for Padre Boulevard Initiative in the Town of South Padre Island, TX

Resource Directory. 1. Counseling Services. 2. Domestic Violence Services. 3. Drug/Substance Abuse Services. 4. Elderly Assistance Services

Housing Markets in Six Metropolitan Areas and their Main Central Cities

Education Tax Credit: Maryland Statewide Voter Poll

The Status of Maryland s Children

Frederick. Frederick. Maryland. Smart Growth Successes. Frederick. Maryland Department of Planning


Econ 137 Urban Economics Lecture Notes III

Wheaton Urban District Market Analysis: Part I Report. Submitted To: Maryland Department of Transportation

Health Insurance Partnership. Enrollment Update

Courtney J. Menjivar PRINCIPAL

Home Buyer Self Pre-Qualification Workbook

Case 1:12-cv BEL Document 1 Filed 02/15/12 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Northern Division)

Long Island is rapidly losing its lead in private health care coverage. That distinctive mark of middle class success - private

Request for Information

University of Maryland, College Park (66-035)

CHAPTER 19 DATA SOURCES FOR REAL ESTATE MARKET ANALYSIS

New York: Center of the World Teacher s Guide

Planning and Development Committee Board Action Item III-A November 16, 2006 Master Agreements

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Copyright 2014 Edmentum - All rights reserved.

How To Improve Housing In Seminole County

A2 YELLOW RIBBON : Recruiting and Serving Veteran Populations Using Chapter 33 Military Benefits

Tax Allocation District Redevelopment Plan for the Stadium Neighborhoods Tax Allocation District Atlanta, Georgia

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Subsidy Enrollments among Accredited Child Care Providers in Maryland

Bankruptcy: What You Need to Know in Maryland

PMO MANAGING DIRECTOR

Press Release. Seven member Committee announced to review proposals for $50 million economic development loan and grant incentives

Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota. Land Use Goals:

Transcription:

B.3.3 Modern Period (1930-1960) The stock market crash of 1929 sharply curtailed post-world War I development. Unlike the rest of the country, though, the suburbs around D.C. continued to expand during the 1930s in order to meet the demand for housing brought about by the large number of people who moved to the area for new Federal jobs. In Montgomery County, the population more than doubled during the 1930s, and by 1940, the Federal government accounted for the largest percentage of wage earners living in the county a significant change from 1920 when the majority of county residents were employed in agriculturally related concerns. Between 1935 and 1940, over 7,000 new dwellings were built, as many as had existed in total in the county in 1920 (Hiebert and MacMaster 1976, 302-304). New developments included the community of Greenbelt, Maryland, designed and built under the direction of the Suburban Resettlement Division of the Resettlement Administration as an experiment in low-cost planned housing (Federal Writers Project 1937, 829). Also during the 1930s, a permit for the first multi-family unit was granted, indicating the beginning of a new housing form that was to become increasingly popular during the post World War II years. This new construction was further removed from the city than earlier suburbs, therefore residents were heavily dependent on automobile travel (Figure 6). African-Americans in and around Washington generally did not benefit from the Federal expansion. Post-war migration to the suburbs did not involve large numbers of African-Americans, despite earlier African-American suburbs, due to patterns of discrimination which discouraged African-American business and professional people from buying or renting homes. In fact, the African-American population of Montgomery County dropped significantly during the 1930s and World War II era as restrictive covenants in neighborhoods increased and employment opportunities decreased. There were better paying jobs and more welcoming residential areas in the District of Columbia and Prince George s County (Hiebert and MacMaster 1976, 302-307). During World War II, the shift to a wartime economy halted suburban growth. After the war, the Federal government acted to stimulate home construction through the Veterans Emergency Housing Act of 1946. Meanwhile, the Washington, D.C. area, like the rest of the country, was suffering from a severe housing shortage, especially low-cost developments, as veterans returned seeking places to live. Temporary housing in areas such as Glen Echo, around Sligo Creek Parkway near Forest Glen Road, and near Takoma Park helped defray some need for shelter while construction on new communities began. The housing boom following World War II was particularly significant in the Washington metropolitan area. The dropping of the atomic bomb served as a catalyst for the Federal government s decision to decentralize itself from the District of Columbia s core to the outlying suburbs. In 1948 the General Services Administration began a plan to disperse government agencies. In 1950, President Truman proposed $139 million to build enough offices in the suburbs to accommodate 40,000 people. By 1951, the Federal government was in conference with Montgomery County officials to discuss ways in which the construction of government offices would have the least impact on the county s farmland and water and sewer systems. The development of Federal enclaves in the B-40

suburbs was not new to the county and officials wanted to be certain that they were well planned. Indeed, several facilities were already located there, including the David Taylor Model Basin (1937), the National Institutes of Health (1938), Bethesda Naval Medical Hospital (1942), and the Defense Mapping Agency (1943). Post war facilities included White Oak Naval Surface Weapons Center (1948), the Atomic Energy Commission (1956) and the National Bureau of Standards (1960) (Hiebert and MacMaster 1976, 351-355). Many new residential developments were constructed some distance from existing markets, schools, and shops in response to the outward movement of jobs and businesses. Automobiles became a necessity. The first post-war shopping centers began to locate closer to residential areas, as road-building projects began to meet the increased demands for access from the suburbs to the city. The first shopping center in Silver Spring was constructed in 1944, and lured other big stores to the area. Soon other areas, including Chevy Chase, began to break ground for suburban shopping centers. The booming industrial and commercial growth encouraged a second housing boom in the late 1950s and 1960s. Differing from the early boom, the second wave of growth focused on larger and more expensive homes. Multi-family housing also increased. By the 1960s, there was an increased emphasis on planned communities that combined single family homes, multi-family units and apartments, and commercial developments. Washington was greatly impacted by the Capital Beltway (I-495). Completed in 1964, the 66-mile-long double-loop road was designed primarily to allow East Coast motorists to bypass the city. But it also became a magnet for high-rise, urban-style office and retail centers that catered to the thousands living outside the periphery of the city (Frankel and Fehr 1997, 1). Montgomery and Prince George's counties both underwent rapid annual growth as a result of the beltway (Figure 7). In addition, the completion of the Baltimore-Washington Parkway in 1954 and I-95 between Baltimore and Washington in 1971 encouraged suburban Washington to creep ever closer to suburban Baltimore. As Washington, D.C. increased in size, scale, and national importance as the center of government, the areas around the district expanded to house the thousands of people who flocked to the city for employment opportunities. Beginning in the midnineteenth century and extending into the present, the history of Washington, D.C. can be traced through the history of its suburbs. Unlike the rest of the country, whose suburbs were initially aimed at the wealthy, Washington's suburbs were, from the beginning, designed to appeal to the middle-class who found employment within the city. As the twentieth century progressed, the suburbs developed from being entirely dependent on the city for shopping, entertainment, and culture, to being centers of life themselves. B-41

B-42

B-43

B-44

B-45

B-46

B-47