A few notes to help you navigate the template:

Similar documents
Daniel Rudi Rudell of Redstart Consulting shares his knowledge of invasive plant management.

WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. (NAME of PROPERTY or MANAGED AREA) (TOWN or COUNTY, STATE) (TIME PERIOD; e.g )

SITE WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. (NAME of PRESERVE or CONSERVATION AREA) (TOWN, STATE) (PERIOD; e.g )

JAPANESE KNOTWEED. What is Japanese Knotweed?

Appendix C. Municipal Planning and Site Restoration Considerations

Controlling Invasive Plants and Animals in our Community

Wildlifer 2013 Managing Wildlife on Private Lands

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Experienced Planning and Design

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Integration of Forestry & Wildlife Management

CHAPTER 2: APPROACH AND METHODS APPROACH

Division of Forestry

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

Integrated Weed Management in Portland Parks

Summary of Pre- and Post-Project Vegetation Survey Results

Invasive Species Jeopardy

(Seattle, WA, More than 500,001, Green Seattle Partnership)

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Attachment I. Santa Barbara County Integrated Pest Management Strategy

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

CRP Mid-Contract Management Option: Integrated Wildlife Management (645)

3. INNS growing wild in my neighbourhood along river, railway, road etc. what to do?

Restoration of riparian ecosystems in the Southwestern U.S., through biological control of the pyrogenic invader Arundo donax.

Town of Richmond Hill Community Stewardship Program

Developing Bid Specifications for Invasive Plant Control Programs

Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership Proposed Demonstration Area A Brief Introduction. Presented by Jeremy Drew Project Manager Resource Concepts, Inc.

Florida Division of Forestry

Conservation Tax Credit Regulations Chapter A-1 RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER


A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

WILDFLOWER RESTORATION PROJECT. Experimental Design and Data Collection Guide

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

PRISM s. Partnership s for Regional Invasive Species Management. A New York Statewide Approach

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

The LAndscape Management Policy Simulator (LAMPS) Pete Bettinger Department of Forest Resources Oregon State University

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Water Quality and Water Usage Surveys

National Association of State Foresters Forestry Performance Measures for the United States REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

Wausau and Marathon County Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Department Forestry Division 2015 Work Plan

EFB / Online Wetland Restoration Techniques Class Syllabus

Best Lawns News. Late Spring 2014 Edition Virginia Cooperative Extension Prince William Unit. Featured in This Issue

How To Manage Your Land

Preserving Wild Ginseng in Minnesota

Part 3. Concept Plans and Table of Works. Swanson Reserves Management Plan

Chapter 1b - Priority Map Development

Project on the Eradication of the Weed Wedelia trilobata from Niue. Pest Management in the Pacific Programme

BENEFITS OF USING IPM

Section 5: Conserve to Enhance Program Goals What is Conserve to Enhance All About?

National Green Jobs Corps 2010

Clean, Drain, Dry! Activity

Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum

Woodlands Management Plan. (Draft June 2011) A. Definition of Woodlands Areas vs. Landscaped Areas of Parkfairfax

RED-TAIL CONSERVANCY ANNUAL REPORT 2005

COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD Invasive Phreatophyte Control Program Grant Application Revised October 2013

Management Plan Template For Conservation Easements Held by CPW

ANNUAL REPORT UNALIENATED CROWN LAND WEED CONTROL TASMAN-NELSON DISTRICT

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

Haida Gwaii Knotweed Herbicide Treatment. Demonstration Project

Evergreen Carbon Capture - 2

2014 Knotweed Treatment In the Cedar River Municipal Watershed

RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing

Getting Started: 10 Questions for Cities and Towns Considering Residential Curbside Composting

Japanese Knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum) Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica)

13. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/ RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Your Defensible Space Slideshow

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Maine Forest Service Interpretations of the Maine Forest Practices Act Statute and Rules (12 MRSA 8867-A to 8888 & MFS Rules Chapter 20)

6. NATURAL AREAS FIRE MANAGEMENT

The Nature Conservancy Offering Protected Lands for Sale in the Adirondacks Sustainable Forestry to Continue

Techniques and Tools for Monitoring Wildlife on Small Woodlands

Integrating Bird Conservation and Natural Resources Management: Best Management Practices. Jennifer Devlin, City of Portland, Environmental Services

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. Division of Forestry

Preparing for Success: Waterfowl Habitat Management Annual Planning by Houston Havens

SECTION 5.4 LOGJAM REMOVAL AND RIVER RESTORATION. Overview. Logjam Removal Using Heavy. Tools. Machinery. Large-Scale River Restoration

How To Know If A Forest Service And Bmd Plan Postfire Rehabilitation And Restoration

Consulting Foresters for Private Landowners

Prioritizing Riparian Restoration at the Watershed, Reach and Site Scales. Richard R. Harris University of California, Berkeley Cooperative Extension

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

Appendix A: Land Protection Plan

Annual Report

Appendix A: Contractor Survey

Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) in Virginia Beach, Virginia. The Resource Protection Area (RPA) and Buffers The First 100 Feet

Toolkit for Conservation Landscaping Projects in Community Spaces

Integrated Pest Management

Restoring Arizona s Forests: Strategies to Accelerate Action. October 3 4, 2013

MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1

Forest Management Guidelines for the Protection of Four-toed and Spotted Salamander Populations Carol Hall & Bruce Carlson May 2004

Eco-Logical Approach to Infrastructure Development Initiative. May 12 & 14, 2010 Eco-Logical Initiative Technical Meeting

Oak Trees BASIC GROWING REQUIREMENTS FOR YOUR

Sustainable Landscape Practices

Ecological Mitigation Strategies

Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013

7/8/2015. Phragmites.org 1. Clay Township Phragmites Management Program July SEMCOG and Ducks Unlimited survey around Lake St.

Transcription:

Use this template to develop a management plan for each desired site. Feel free to modify it to suit the scale and goals of each project. This plan becomes the reference point for making decisions on where to focus resources. It also serves as a communication tool to decision makers, such as town managers and select board members, potential contractors, and future funders. A few notes before you begin: Determine who needs to be involved in writing and reviewing the plan. Be sure to involve the land owner, land manager, and other stakeholder groups. Enlist the help of knowledgeable ecologists or foresters. Determine if materials (maps, text, etc.) already exist regarding the site under consideration. Develop a timeline for writing the plan. This will keep things moving. Keep in mind resources that are currently available or may be available in the future. Remember to use an integrated management approach. In most cases, you will want to integrate many control options, including mechanical and chemical, and potentially other methods. Review the tips on developing a management plan, found in the Community Handbook for Outreach and Management. Reminders: It will be helpful for someone in the community to become a certified herbicide applicator. This will allow the person to legally oversee volunteers. Call the Vermont Department of Agriculture for more information: 802-828-3482; or go to http://www.vermontagriculture.com/armes/am/pesticide.html. Check with your Town regarding liability for the certified herbicide applicator applying herbicides on town lands. For larger infestations, difficult to treat plants, and difficult to treat areas, consider hiring a certified applicator. If the management area is near water and you plan to use herbicides, you will need a permit from VT DEC. Call 802-241-3761 for more information. Learn more about each species found on the property: how it reproduces; what management options exist; and the effectiveness of control options for the species. For more information on invasives management go to www.vtinvasives.org A few notes to help you navigate the template: Text in black can be used as is, or could be rewritten in your own words. Text in red includes instructional notes that indicate the types of information that would be useful to include in a particular section. Sections of original tables from plan developed for a floodplain forest restoration project in Richmond, Vermont are included with blue headings. We present these in order to demonstrate a useful format for the included information. If you use a digital version of this template to create your own plan, be sure not to accidentally include any Richmond specific information in your plan!

Invasive Plant Management Plan FOR Name of site and location 20-20 We recommend developing a plan for a 5-year span. This is long enough to allow for the development of reasonable long-term goals, and short enough to be realistic, given the inevitable changes in local conditions and the science regarding invasive species management. Annual updates are still recommended. PREPARED BY Prepared, Updated Update recommended annually

Project Partners Organizations and agencies participating in the Restoration Project include: List here any governmental, non-profit, or other community groups who have given or are on tap to provide technical, administrative or practical support to your project. Be sure to remember community volunteer groups and individuals!

Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 5 A. Site Description... 5 B. Site Purpose... 5 C. Desired Condition: Reduced Populations of Invasive Species... 5 D. Current Condition... 5 E. Invasive Species Inventory... 5 II. INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PRIORITIZATION AND TIMELINE... 6 A. Identifying Invasive Plant Management Priorities... 7 B. Recommended Invasive Species Control Priorities within the Project Area... 7 C. Early Detection, Rapid Response... 7 D. Timeline of Seasonal Activities... 8 III. PUBLIC OUTREACH AND EDUCATION... 8 IV. REFERENCES... V. APPENDICES... The following are samples of the types of materials that might be included in an appendix. A. Invasive Plant Survey Maps... B. Detailed Description & Recommended Control of Invasive Species in... C. Recommendations for Further Research... D. Developing Bid Specifications for Contracting Invasive Plant Control Support E. Invasive Plant Fact Sheets...

I. INTRODUCTION A. Site Description This section includes: A description of the precise location of the site Summary of land cover, forest types and/or natural communities present on the site. Include any water features, agricultural fields, etc. that are in the project area. Enlist the help of knowledgeable ecologists, botanists, foresters, birders, and wildlife enthusiasts. Refer to Wetland, Woodland, Wildland by Elizabeth Thompson and Eric Sorenson for information on natural communities. Information regarding current ownership, use and management of the site, including relevant information regarding adjoining properties. Include reference to a map. This can be developed using GIS, USDA quad maps, etc. B. Site Purpose This section identifies: Who manages the site What types of people (school groups, bikers, hikers, birders, canoeists) use the site, Overview of land management goals related to conserving land, protecting wildlife species, timber harvesting, recreational use, etc. C. Desired Condition: Reduced Populations of Invasive Species This section will include a more descriptive statement of what a healthy ecosystem (forest, riparian buffer, etc.) at this site would look like, and how removing invasive terrestrial plants will help to ensure long-term management goals. If invasives are removed, which plant species would likely thrive? If it is a forest that is used for timber management, recreation or sugaring, how would removing invasives help the site to function properly for its intended purpose? If it is a wetland, how would removing invasives help contribute to wildlife habitat? In a recreational area, how will removing invasives enhance recreational opportunities? Included might be specific descriptions of ecological activity and interactions, such as how succession would be expected to proceed if invasives were removed. D. Current Condition Prior to writing the plan, conduct an inventory using imapinvasives. Indicate the timing, participants and methodology of the survey. Summarize the degree of infestation, noting in general terms portions of the site that might be more or less heavily infested. Make note of those areas that are invasive-free. List invasive plant species, location, and general abundance. Note obvious current ecological impacts, and potential future impacts if the invasives are not managed. What plant species are not present that should be (tree seedlings, spring wildflowers, etc.)?

Consider using a table similar to the one below to summarize invasive species found on the site. Vermont is now subscribing to imapinvasives, a georeferenced database and invasives mapping tool which any Vermonter can use for free. Use this for your inventory and mapping needs By doing so you will also be contributing to statewide knowledge and research. Go to www.vtinvasives.org for more information. EXAMPLE ONLY: Table 1: Invasive Species Inventory (partial) Species Japanese knotweed Fallopia japonica Garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata Location and Abundance Currently grows in both small and large patches in the project area, particularly where there are gaps in the overstory providing sunlight, such as along the forest edges, including the trail and river bank. An infestation where the Beeken Preserve meets the Town of Richmond property dominates the stream bank for hundreds of feet. Found in small patches on both sides of the river. Goutweed Aegopodium podagraria Common and Glossy Buckthorns Rhamnus cathartica and Rhamnus frangula Common Reed Phragmites australis Carpets large patches of the understory in the project area. It occurs on all properties. A few isolated infestations of these two species were identified, primarily on private property on the downstream end of the project area. A significant infestation of Phragmites australis exists at a wetland on the Richmond Town property. Small infestations were also identified on the south side of the river on the Richmond Town property and RLT Beeken Preserve II. INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PRIORITIZATION AND TIMELINE The workplan described below will guide invasive species management efforts in the project area for the next (five?) years (20-20 ). At the end of this period, partners will assess progress made toward their goals. Due to the number of invasive species, and the density of several of these species, it will not be feasible to eliminate all occurrences of all invasive species from the project area. With steady work each year, however, many patches can be reduced or eliminated, further spread can be checked, new infestations can be prevented, and native species will be allowed to thrive. The following section outlines the weed management plan. It includes a) an outline of prioritization by species; b) a timeline of seasonal activities that identifies when activities will take place, lists needed equipment, and staffing and/or volunteer needs; and, c) a species-b- species summary of management options. This information was developed using available research and. This plan is currently designed to address the invasive plant control priorities of (state here the partner organizations involved in management of this parcel of land.) The plan was developed in consult with and/or reviewed by (ecologist? TNC? Other?) It was approved by on such and such date. Also indicate any potential limitations of the plan due, for example, to privately owned lands within or abutting the project area. State the ideal management goals related to lands not currently included in

the management plan, and any strategies for addressing these in the future. Also include intentions or recommendations to further hone or develop the plan, as applicable. A. Identifying Invasive Plant Management Priorities Unfortunately, when working in an area heavily infested with invasive plants, most of the time there is no one method that will completely eliminate each species. Management priorities are set with the goal of achieving greatest ecological benefit while minimizing the total, long-term workload and project costs. In order to determine which invasive species to work on, we must take into consideration several factors, including: Ecological priorities: A brief statement of issues relevant to your site. Recreational land uses: A brief statement of issues relevant to your site. Available resources: Project leaders should assess available and potential resources including funding, volunteers, expertise, and equipment as well long-term goals. Invasive Management Techniques: It can be easier, more cost-effective, and more ecologically beneficial to manage certain species than others. In addition, there are a number of techniques for controlling invasives species, some more effective than others. Therefore it is important to make management decisions based on the ability to control one or more species, the techniques available at a specific site, and concerns for impact to native species. These factors have been considered in this management plan. Each year, as work progresses and resources change, the year s work plan may shift slightly. However, consistent management targeting priority species in priority areas will offer the best results. It is also critical to keep in that invasive species management needs to become an ongoing management task. B. Recommended Invasive Species Control Priorities within the Project Area Based on the identified ecological and land-use priorities within the project area and the realities of invasive plant control (available resources and known techniques for plant control) we recommend focusing control actions on the following: Delineate which species to focus on by organizing them into categories. High priority Medium priority Low priority Include a brief statement for each species or group of species citing the rationale for including it in its designated level of priority. How will you prioritize your efforts? Consider the following order: 1) Early detection of invasive species; 2) Control of small, isolated populations; 3) Protection of high-quality areas with few invasive species; 4) Management of high-use areas that may be a source of further infestations; 5) Ability to manage a particular species. For example, in Richmond s Floodplain Forest Restoration Project, it was determined to be impossible to manage goutweed without killing the Ostrich fern. Therefore, it was listed as low priority. C. Early Detection, Rapid Response Invasive plants will likely continue to be introduced and/or persist in this natural community. In order to prevent the further spread of existing invasive plants into uninfested areas, and to manage the likely introduction of new species, it will be important to regularly monitor the site for new invasions. Specifically:

List here specific species and areas to watch out for, and the planned response new infestations or new species are detected. D. Timeline of Seasonal Activities Include here a summary paragraph of management activities, organized by season. A detailed description of each of the seasonal activities is described in Table 2. EXAMPLE ONLY: Table 2: Summary of Annual Weed Management Activities (partial) Season Activity Equipment Time Early Spring (March through May): Monitoring Garlic mustard pulling: Garlic mustard rosettes are one of the first plants to turn green in the spring and are therefore easy to identify. Volunteers will hand-pull plants, bag them in industrial sized garbage bags and haul them off-site. Once they are fully decomposed, they will be thrown away. After each workday, boots should be brushed off to prevent the spread of seeds. If there were a safe place to compost the plants that someone could keep an eye on, it would eliminate the expense of disposal in a landfill. The first pass through should happen as early in the spring as possible after the floodwaters recede, while the ostrich ferns are still curled up as fiddleheads, for better visibility and to avoid trampling the ferns. Woody invasive pulling: This is a great time for experienced volunteers to pull up honeysuckle, barberry and buckthorn seedlings since they re easy to see before the ferns unfurl. Seedlings can be hung in a tree to dry (no off-site disposal is needed). Annual walk along both sides of river by TNC and RLT staff & volunteers to map populations of invasive plants. gloves, buckets, contractor - sized trash bags to collect and remove, dandelion diggers GPS, clipboards, maps. At least four days of labor by 10 volunteers. 2 days for a first pass in March or April, 2 more days for a second pass in early May. 1 day/year for 8 people, III. PUBLIC OUTREACH AND EDUCATION This section should include a description of the outreach and education needs related to the project, and a discussion of the volunteer recruitment strategy. Making public education and volunteer recruitment planning an integral part of the plan will both help you to develop realistic management goals, and ensure a greater chance of long-lasting success in meeting those goals.

EXAMPLE ONLY: Table 3: Proposed Public Education and Outreach Activities Objective & Tasks Completion date Lead Partner Outreach and volunteer recruitment, training, support for invasive plant control activities over the next five years, This includes an annual celebration for all volunteers, complete with food, slideshow, and door prizes. ongoing RLT & all partners Media outreach including radio spots, local newspaper articles, etc. ongoing RLT & all partners Four public outreach workshops, designed to support volunteer efforts and increase the project s ecological impact. A: Local natural history focusing on silver maple-ostrich fern floodplain forest ecology, & the threat posed by invasive species B: Hands-on invasive species identification and removal workshop, to kick-off the volunteer season; C: Hands-on workshop for VYCC crew leaders teaching invasive species identification and removal D Workshop about landscaping for wildlife enhancement focus on removing and replacing invasive species Develop and present a land manager's technical workshop (For land managers throughout the Champlain Basin, to share technical skills in invasives control, and how to implement a community weed management plan). Develop and present workshop and resources for Richmond road crews so that they adopt wise road management practices that reduce the spread of invasive species. 8/2010 RLT/TNC 9/2010 RLT, TNC 6/2010 RLT, TNC Develop a local display on native and invasive plants to educate the public about landscaping with non-invasive plants: To be housed in a visible location in town during the spring planting season, and serve to educate people about alternative non-invasive species useful in landscaping year-round. 6/2010 RLT, TNC (Consider developing with local school groups Master Gardeners; UVM) If necessary, develop re-vegetation plans and guidance materials ongoing RLT and TNC Inspire 10 households to remove invasive species from their landscaping (with a focus on landowners in close proximity to RLT and TNC land?!) Update the invasive plant management plan covering all participating properties within the project area for all major weeds Summer 2011 Winter 2011/2012 RLT TNC, RLT & Cons Comm Maintenance and updating of GIS and inventory maps Annually Cons Comm

Appendix A: EXAMPLE ONLY: Detailed Description & Recommended Control of Invasive Species on Richmond Floodplain Forest (partial) Species & Priority Level Description Distribution & Threats Mgmt Objectives Management Options & Recommendation Japanese Knotweed Fallopia japonica or Polygonum cuspidatum Priority level HIGH Japanese knotweed is a fast-growing, herbaceous perennial that grows three to seven or eight feet high & forms large, dense patches. The dispersal and spread of Japanese knotweed occurs largely through the spread and growth of rhizomes (roots), which may reach up to 45-50 feet in length. Spread is particularly high along riverbanks, where soil is loose and periodic flooding moves plant material down stream. Distribution: Heavy, especially on TNC land. In certain areas the plants form a 10-75 foot buffer from the river inland. Threats: Knotweed spreads quickly through its rhizomes and without control will continue to invade all areas of the floodplain forest. Control knotweed in the floodplain forest and prevent further spread. Allow no-netincrease in knotweed cover in the floodplain forest. Manual control: Each year, from June September cut back knotweed. At first, this control can be done with loppers or garden shears. After several seasons, the plants will be less robust and the stalks are much thinner. When the plants are smaller, it is easier to cut them back with a scythe or grass whip. Take care and do not cut native plants that regenerate. This may require careful cutting with hand clippers around the native plants. Herbicide control: Small patches: apply herbicide to cut stem in August; return following year to check for surviving sprouts. Large patches: In August conduct a foliar spray of knotweed using a 2% glyphosate solution that is approved for use near water. (Because the infestation is so heavy, a combination of mechanical and herbicide treatment will be necessary on both RLT, Richmond Town, and TNC natural areas. Eventually, working with private landowners will be essential to long-term success of the project.