European key IT and Management Issues & Trends for 201 Results of an International Study Jerry Luftman Ph.D., Global Institute for IT Management dr.lec. Barry Derksen MMC CISA CGEIT, Business & IT Trends Institute What s next.
Table of Contents _ 2 Top ten IT Management Concerns... 4 Top Five Applications and Technology Investments... 10 IT Budget Allocation... 14 IT Organization Considerations... 16 CIO Trends... 18 IT Outsourcing... 22 Concluding Remarks... 2 The four areas focused on in the report are: 1. Top IT Management Concerns 2. Top Application and Technology Investments. IT Budget Allocation 4. IT Organizational Considerations Public sector / Non profit Business Professional Services Financial services / Real estate / Insurance Hardware / Software / Networking Wholesale / Retail / Trading Auto / Industrial / Manufacturing Pharmaceutical / Biotechnology / Life sciences Construction Chemicals / Energy / Utilities Food / Beverages / Consumer packaged goods Other Media / Entertainment / Travel and Leisure Aerospace / defense Telecommunication Transportation / Warehousing Education Healthcare EU 14,8% 298= 12,8% 256= 11,5% 20= 10,5% 210=,9% 80= 9,2% 184= 5,6% 112= 5,6% 115= 7,2% 144= 2,6% 52= 2,6% 52= 4,% 86= 0,7% 14= 0,% 6=,0% 60= 2,0% 40= 2,0% 40= USA 144= 7,2% 48= 17,4% 00= 14,9% 102= 5,1% 72=,6% 200= 9,7% 92= 4,6% 42= 2,1% 52= 2,6% 102= 5,1% 0 0% 124= 6,2% 20= 1,0% 0= 1,5% 20= 1,0% 144= 7,2% 144= 7,2% Percentage of Respondents by Industry
t+1+7+10+2+4+1+1+11+4+6 Introduction Since 1980, the Society for Information Management (SIM), in a joint effort with different academic leaders, has conducted an annual survey of the key issues facing IT executives in the United States. In 2010 the results of the Society for Information Management and the Dutch survey results on Business & IT Trends (since 1994) were combined providing a global benchmark (other groups were engaged to collect data from Asia, and Latin America). In addition to providing a snapshot of the important IT technical and managerial issues of the day and a benchmark of the different geographies, this annual report facilitates the identification of Norway 2% Spain 10% significant trends by comparing survey data based on a similar sample from previous years. The 2012 survey, conducted in the summer of 2012, focused on three important areas: Management concerns Application and technology investments (IT Trends) Organizational issues (IT budgets, IT staff salaries, CIO roles, IT organization structure) Participants were asked to rate the importance of 9 managerial concerns, 51 application and technology opportunities, and 18 organizational issues. Belgium 14+ 14% Netherlands 45% UK 7% Poland 0,% Luxembourg 0,% France 6% Germany 4% Italy 11% Ireland 0,% The recognition of the global reach of IT, especially in light of the impact of both the European and global economic crisis, has amplified the necessity to obtain responses from organizations around the globe to understand similarities and difference across geographies. Hence, this year the same survey was conducted in five major geographies, namely, U.S., Europe, Asia, Australia and Latin America. The detailed results from the U.S. appeared in MISQE in December 2012; while the complete global analysis will be in JIT by the 2 nd Quarter of 201. This paper focuses on the major insights gained from this survey in Europe 2012-201, and compares the results to the results from the U.S. It is based on IT executives that are members of CIONET Europe and Business & IT Trends Institute. This paper is based on the responses from IT executives representing 06 Western European organizations contributing to the Strategic Information Management survey (See figure and table below for participant demographics). The important management concerns are shown in Table 2. Figure 1 provides a breakdown of respondents based on their geography and Table 1 provides a breakdown of the respondents by industry. We hope that you recognize the significance of this research and participate in next year s survey. Percentage of Respondents by Geography
1. Top ten IT Management Concerns 4 Top IT management concerns EU 2012 EU 2011 EU 2010 US 2012 US 2011 US 2010 Business productivity and cost reduction 1 1 1 4 1 IT and business alignment 2 1 4 2 1 Business agility & speed to market 1 2 2 IT cost reduction 4 6 8 5 10 8 IT reliability and efficiency 5 4 6 10 6 Business process management/reengineering 6 5 2 7 IT strategic planning 7 7 7 6 5 6 Change management 8 9 5 12 12 12 Security and privacy 9 8 15 9 8 9 Enterprise architecture/infrastructure capability 10 10 10 8 7 1 The top 10 management concerns tend to evolve slowly albeit the severe recession begun in 2007 continues to impact some of the management priorities of 2012 and those projected for 201. Two European and U.S. concerns that have traditionally remained on the top ten list are: IT and business alignment, and business productivity and cost reduction (Luftman and Ben-Zvi, 2010b). This year the two most important European management concerns are: business productivity and cost reduction as well as IT and business alignment. Interestingly IT cost reduction is increasing in importance within Europe and the U.S. This is a result of the current European based economic discussions with regards to the European nation, and the current strong negative economical impact of countries such as Greece, Spain, and Italy. When compared with other management concerns (business productivity & cost reduction, business process management/reengineering, and revenue generating IT innovations (11 th in Europe and 4 th in U.S.)). Europe tends to be more cost oriented in comparison with the U.S. IT cost reduction is ranked 4 th in Europe, as opposed to the U.S. (ranked 5 th ) and revenue generating IT innovations is ranked 4 th in US and ranked 11th in Europe. The discussion below elaborates on this finding.
5 Top IT management concerns (Countries) Business productivity and cost reduction IT and business alignment Business agility & speed to market IT cost reduction IT reliability and efficiency Europe Belgium France Italy Germany Netherlands Norway Spain UK 1 1 2 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 4 5 2 6 2 6 2 6 9 6 2 4 5 1 4 11 2 2 4 5 6 4 6 8 7 10 From a country perspective the European management concerns varies. This is partly because of the limited responses for some countries (Norway and Germany). Interestingly IT and business alignment is of lesser importance in the U.K. (ranked 6 th ) which is more focused on societal implications of IT (ranked 4 th ) to market as well as change management (ranked 5 th ). France ranked IT cost reduction as priority 1, which ranked second for both the Netherlands and Norway. Although this is related to the economic crisis, the northern countries seem to use cost reduction as a higher priority than countries which are affected stronger by the economic crisis (Spain, Italy). In Norway the number 1 IT management concern is Outsourcing/ Vendor management which implies that Norway wants to leverage IT possibilities in order to reduce costs and focusing on core business. Both Italy and Germany have IT and business alignment ranked 1 st supporting the view that a mature level of IT and business alignment is important to realize revenue generating IT innovations. Examples of these are TomTom and Nokia where both are facing difficulties due to the fast rising completion from Apple and Google.
6 1. Business productivity and cost reduction 2. IT and business alignment. Business agility and speed to market Business productivity and cost reduction also appears as a top concern in all geographies (ranked 1 st within Europe). It has recently gained momentum with a number 1 position universally in 2010, It ranked 4 th in the top management concerns globally last year and is currently ranked 1 st within the U.S. The IT cost reduction, and the importance of improving business productivity is in line with the findings of Luftman and Ben-Zvi that the current trend seems to be unique in this recession (Luftman and Ben-Zvi, 2010b); instead of simply cutting IT budgets, IT leaders seem to be responding to this recession by focusing on IT as an enabler/driver of business productivity for the rest of the business. Even though data for individual countries are not reported in this paper, it is interesting to note that this trend is present in all geographies. Within Europe business productivity and cost reduction are ranked first but IT cost reduction is also among the top 5 management concerns. Having both IT cost reduction and business productivity & cost reduction within the top 5 management concern might create conflicts in managing both concerns if not managed effectively. Alignment of IT and business continues to be elusive, and in all of the geographies it ranks in the top ten management concerns; ranking 2 nd in both the U.S. and Europe. The importance of IT and business alignment is often seen in return on investment. IT business alignment maturity can be measured (Luftman, 200) and higher maturity in this measurement model results in better return on IT investment (Luftman 2012, Derksen, 201, Poels, 2006). Demonstrating a significant positive correlation between alignment and company performance both European and U.S. organizations are proceeding to work at higher alignment levels. Despite this effort, IT and business alignment remains a top 10 IT management concern for 0 years. Looking at the ranking of IT and business alignment management concern there is no excuse for not reaching to higher levels of alignment and supporting the perception that IT and business alignment is a constant process. IT leaders in most demographics see IT as an integral driver/enabler of efficiency/effectiveness in other parts of the business and therefore focus on initiatives that enhance the maturity of alignment between IT and business. While IT business alignment has been recognized for over 0 years as a persistent problem, it is clear that it is pervasive and persistent. Business agility and speed to market is ranked rd in Europe and is rd in the U.S (IT business alignment is also No.2 ranked in U.S.). Business agility and speed to market is essential for business survival in an uncertain and volatile economy, and the improved ranking of business agility and speed to market is testimony to that. Known examples of business agility and speed to market are of course Apple (ipad) and Google (Chrome). Regional business agility and speed to market is fundamental. Both the European and U.S. results demonstrate this well because the past couple of years business agility and speed to market have moved up from the mid-teens to the number 1 European management concern. It is noted that business agility and speed to market along with business productivity and cost reduction are the foundation for long term competitive advantage, and therefore it is anticipated that these concerns will continue their top five ranking. This result suggests that the downturn in the Europe economy has driven organizations to focus on responsive IT approaches that can deliver immediate value. Speed to market has become essential for business survival in today s economy.
4. IT cost reduction In the top 5 IT management concerns IT cost reduction ranked 4 th from the European perspective and was 5 th in 2011. IT cost reduction remains a top IT management concern within Europe focusing on reducing the costs of IT whereas this management concern is now also increasingly important as IT management concern ranking within the U.S (5 th this year and 10 th last year). The current European based economic discussion with regards to the European nation is expected to be the cause, which is also correct for the U.S. During economic downturns, business executives usually expect all organizational functions, including IT, to greatly reduce their expenses and budgets. In previous recessions IT was typically the first organization to have their budgets reduced; in this economic period, IT cost reduction has only recently risen as a high priority, likely because of the length of time and economic uncertainty. When the economy gets better, those pressures usually ease. IT cost reduction refers to the costs of realizing, implementing and managing IT. One of the most used comparison methods is the usage of Total Cost of Ownership methods starting with measuring the percentage of revenues spend on IT shown in Table (blanks indicate that there is not enough valid responses). We will elaborate on the top five. 5. IT reliability and efficiency The growing complexities of IT systems, along with the need to consider costs, have brought IT reliability, availability and efficiency to the forefront. IT reliability and efficiency is ranked 5 th in Europe and 10 th in the U.S. This management concern has been a top five management concern in Europe since 2009. In the U.S. IT reliability and efficiency was rd in 2010 but traded places with the European ranking last year and is now 10th in the U.S. IT reliability and efficiency refers to the accuracy, timeliness, and reliability of data and information services delivered by IT (Luftman and Ben-Zvi, 2010b). The relatively higher ranking of IT reliability and efficiency in Europe is based on two distinct explanations. To have a reliable and efficient IT, stored data and information need to be pristine, and European IT leaders are often concerned about the quality and accuracy of data/information in their organizations. Secondly European organizations are preparing for the fast IT changes due to the rise of tablets and strategies such as Bring Your Own Device (BYOD). Based on the current platforms and implemented integrated applications the IT reliability and efficiency is often not ready to support a stable environment for developments based on BYOD and others. A second reason for the displayed ranking and also based on the technology developments is the increasing usage of IT reliability and efficiency statements such as SAS70 and ISEA402 (cloud security alliance, 2009). 6. Business process management and reengineering Business process management (BPM) and business process reengineering (BPR) are ranked in the list of top ten concerns in all of the geographies (ranked 6 th in Europe and 7 th in the U.S.). Since the 90s large corporations leveraged the BPR tools that analyze, design, and automate workflows and processes within an organization, and as a result, BPM and BPR have appeared every year in the list of top concerns in Europe. In global perspective BPM/BPR slowly moved to the 18 th place in 2008 and returned to the top 5 management concerns in 2009. BPR by definition is process-centric. More recently BPM has emerged as a more holistic approach focusing on integrating all aspects of the organization. It has become an important tool to take advantage of BPR initiatives. BPM is utilized to streamline end-to-end management of the whole enterprise (enterprise-centric). During the economic downturn as organizations focus on leveraging IT to reduce expenses by enhancing business processes and as the recovery from the recession gets underway, corporations large and small need to compete in a globally-linked market place, it is expected that business process management and reengineering will remain a top management concern globally. The high ranking of ERP as an important application and technology (discussed later in this paper) provides further support for this important consideration. 7
8 Both the European based information technology (1.86%) and finance/ banking/insurance industry (14.27%) have a higher IT budget as percent of revenue in comparison with the U.S. (1. and 10.6%), which was also true for last year. The majority of the responses came from EU based organizations which did invest heavily in integration across country borders. It is likely that the IT budget as percent of revenue by industry classification will be corrected in the next few years to become closer to the U.S. percentages. This statement is already partly visible when looking at the 2011 figures (14.75% for information technology and 14.25% for Finance/ Banking). 14+1+6+5+5+4+++2+1+1+v Europe 2012 IT budget as percent of revenue by industry classification Manufacturing 1,6% R&D/VAR/VAD 1,75% Aerospace,5% Transportation 2,94% Finance/Banking 14,27% Computer/Network Consulting 1,86% Education 6,8% External Services Provider (DP) 5,5% Business Services 5,1% Government 4,1% Pharmaceutical/Healthcare,19%
9 10+1+5+8+10+2+4+2+2+2+10+v US 2012 IT budget as percent of revenue by industry classification Real Estate/Legal Services 10,6% Manufacturing 2,8% Wholesale/Retail 2,25% Transportation 2% Aerospace 4% Finance/Banking 10,6% Computer/Network Consulting 1,% Education 5,25% Business Services 8,29% Government 9,90% Pharmaceutical/Healthcare 2,%
2. Top Five Applications and Technology Investments 10 Top Application and Technology Development (Europe and U.S.) EU 2012 EU 2011 EU 2010 US 2012 US 2011 US 2010 Business Intelligence (incl. Big Data) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cloud Computing 2 8 1 2 2 2 Apps Development* 11 Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems 4 2 2 Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 5 6 5 5 5 Network Communications 6 11 9 12 Business Process Management (BPM) systems 7 5 5 9 16 16 Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)* 8 7 Continuity planning / disaster recovery 9 10 17 1 14 4 Customer Corporate portals / External Community Platforms* 10 16 * New to 2012 The top five applications and technologies does not differ much between Europe and U.S. The big differences are the higher European ranking for Apps and Networking. The top five applications and technologies for 2012 are discussed (and illustrated in the Tables) below with comparisons across the surveyed geographies. Looking from a country perspective the ranking of customer relationship management (CRM) in the U.K. is remarkable (27 th ). An explanation can be found in a more internal organizational focus instead of looking beyond the organizational boarders. For Norway the ranking of apps development (1 th ) is interesting. Norway is historically a country which is highly digitally cooperative with other countries
11 Top Application and Technology Development per country Business intelligence Cloud Computing Apps Development* Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Europe Belgium France Italy Germany Netherlands Norway Spain UK 1 1 7 1 4 1 1 1 2 2 1 4 10 2 1 2 4 10 1 5 1 5 5 4 9 2 5 2 6 4 1 5 4 2 9 16 7 27 * New to 2012
12 1. Business Intelligence 2. Cloud Computing. Apps development Business intelligence (BI) remained the top application/technology (a clear standout), having been in the top since 200. BI includes big data and data mining to identify valuable business trends. Global research conducted by Oxford Economics identified business intelligence as the 2 nd top technology for the next five years. 1 That research also revealed how companies value the ability to analyze information to rapidly inform decision-makers. An IBM MIT Sloan Management report revealed that companies that harness the power of big data and analytics outperform those that do not by 220%. 2 An IDC study on the financial impact of business intelligence identified a 5-year Return on Investment of 112%. European companies ranked business intelligence as their top application and technology development, like the U.S. where it has also been ranked 1 st in 2009 and 2010, and 2 nd in 2006, 2007, and 2008 (Luftman and Ben-Zvi, 2010b, Luftman and Ben-Zvi, 2010a). Since business intelligence leverages data mining to identify valuable insight, this high ranking across these geographies suggests that IT leaders believe their organizations are data rich and insight poor (Luftman and Ben-Zvi, 2010b). Another reason for the business intelligence number 1 ranking is the increasing role of best practices such as COBIT (Control OBjectives IT). Having business intelligence supporting reports with regards to the best practices supports management control objectives as well as discovering and correcting errors in the business. Cloud computing was new to the list of key technologies in 2009, when it was ranked No. 17. In 2010 it jumped to No. 5 and in 2012 it ranked 2 nd in Europe. At first glance this jump in ranking might suggest that cloud computing is now better understood and the solutions have become more mature. Additionally, the Gartner 2011 CIO Survey reveals that almost half of all CIOs surveyed expect to operate their applications and infrastructures via cloud technologies within the next five years. 4 Bain & Company predicts that over the next three years nearly 65% of the growth in cloud spending will come from companies that make little or no use of the cloud today. And industries like retail, transportation, industrials and financial services will demand more private and hybrid cloud offerings. 5 However, the 2012 SIM survey also asked participants what percentage of their IT budgets was allocated to internal and external cloud services. On average for all respondents, 5% of IT budgets were allocated to internal cloud (with 12% of the companies allocating 10% or more of their budgets to the cloud, and 7% allocating less than 1%) and on average 4% are allocated to external cloud (with 16% of the companies allocating 10% or more, and 41% allocating less than 1%). While cloud computing is likely to remain one of the top technologies in the near future, companies are proceeding its deployment cautiously. Last year we saw organizations trying to understand Cloud and how it can be deployed. This year organizations have initiated pilots and experiments to gain experience. It is anticipated that next year Cloud investments will continue to rise. The long term implications of Cloud computing remain unclear; it is analogous to the understanding of the long term impact of PCs in the late 1980s. At rd place in the ranking of IT application and technology is Apps development. This is a trend which is new to this year s survey. In the past year it is relatively easy to say that Apple has made a huge impact in the European market with its introduction of the iphone and ipad and introducing the Apps market and later on followed by Google (Android) and (much) later by Microsoft/Nokia. Results from this revolution is that European organizations started to introduce a Bring-Your- Own-Device policy and placing major applications behind an Apple-iOS and/ or Google-Android App (Derksen, 2011). With this development other trends such as security started a new phase as well. Interestingly is that Apple is most popular (ChangeWave research, 2011) impacting the mobile & wireless applications because of the platform used (ios). This change to the platforms of Apple (ios) and Google (Android) is expected to impact business architecture as well as the applications and technology used within organizations. Another aspect is the implication towards the previously discussed application and technology investments for which interfaces to mobile & wireless applications will be key to support the employees as well keeping a competitive level of doing business.
4. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems is ranked 4 rd in Europe and rd in U.S. The thought of having an integrated system has existed for a long time and remains high on the IT application & technology list. Despite the high level of implementation within Europe, ERP is still one of the top ranked applications & technology trends. This is based largely because of upgrades and realizing less demonstrable value from the ERP implementations within organizations whereas having more instances of ERP within a company is significantly more expensive than having one instance. The ERP trend in light of the anticipated growth of cloud computing systems (currently ranked 2 nd in Europe and 2 nd in U.S.) will be interesting to observe. Cloud computing solutions are typically less client based and are currently more best of breed focused. 5. Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Customer relationship management (CRM) was 6 th in Europe in 2010, rd in 2011 but 5 th in 2012. The increased ranking in 2011 might be a response from organizations on the economic downturn investing more in customer relations/ intimacy (Treacy, 1992) but seems to be quickly realized. Related to this response are the IT management concerns business agility & speed to market as well as business productivity & cost reduction. The CRM application investment is often related to ERP both as module of ERP or interfaced with ERP. Another related top 5 ranked IT application & technology is business process management systems managing the workflow between the systems such as CRM, ERP and business intelligence. According to Gartner Inc., the worldwide social CRM market (which is subsumed in social networking) is forecast to reach over $1 billion in revenue by year-end 2012, up from approximately $625 million in 2010 6 ; this market is projected to total $820 million in 2011. It should be noted that SaaS applications ranked No. 2, and the current leading application is Salesforce. com. The return on investment of CRM is approximately years 7 with the average increased revenues at 16.% 8. 1 Oxford Economics, 2011, The new digital economy: How it will transform business. http://www.citibank. com/transactionservices/home/docs/ the_new_digital_economy.pdf 2 2011 IBM MIT BI report is: http:// sloanreview.mit.edu/feature/achieving-competitive-advantage-throughanalytics/ Morris, H., 200, The Financial Impact of Business Analytics: Build vs. Buy, DM Review, (1)1, pp.40-414 McDonald, M., Aron, D., op. cit., 2011. 5 Heric, M., Kermisch, R., and Bertrand, S. 2011, The five faces of the cloud. Bain & Company. 6 Gartner Press Release, Gartner Says the Market for Social CRM Is on Pace to Surpass $1 Billion in Revenue by Year-End 2012, August 0, 2011, http://www.gartner.com/it/page. jsp?id=177798 7 Derksen, B., (2011), Trends in Business & IT 2012-201, November 2011, p.p. 14. 8 CSO Insights 2010 Sales Performance Optimization Study and http://www.destinationcrm.com/ Articles/Columns-Departments/ Reality-Check/Has-CRM-Lost-Its- Revenue-Mojo-66859.aspx 1
. IT Budget Allocation 14 This section discusses the survey findings related to the overall allocation of IT budgets with a further discussion on staffing and compensation matters. 1. Overall Budget Allocation Considerations The next wave of the recession might be underway, albeit at different rates in different geographies. European CIOs reported increased IT budgets in 2012 compared to 2011 with 28% of the companies in Europe and 48% in the U.S. indicating increases. Over 0% of Europe and 21.8% of U.S. respondents indicated that their IT budgets would decrease in 201. 9% of the European companies will keep the same IT budget in 201 as used in 2012 whereas this is just 2% for the U.S. organizations. The IT budget forecasts are better for U.S. companies in comparison with the European organizations for the second year in a row. 2. Percentage of 2012/201 budget allocated to internal and external Cloud computing One of the current application and technology trends is cloud computing. We evaluated the budget allocated to internal and external cloud computing. On average.71% of the IT budget was allocated to internal cloud computing (using cloud technology within the organization) and 2.74% to external cloud computing. 21.6% of the companies researched allocated over 10% of the IT budget to internal cloud. Usage of external cloud computing is relatively low with 41% (57% previous year) of the European companies spending less than 1% of their IT budget on external cloud usage. 20% of the European companies have allocated IT budget to external cloud with of 20% of higher. 4.4% of the organizations invest between 1 and 5% of the IT budget on external cloud. While just about everyone is discussing Cloud, organizations are just beginning to invest in small/pilot initiatives. This is anticipated to grow over time.. IT Budget as a Percent of Revenues While the often-benchmarked average IT budget as a percentage of revenue for the U.S. was.87 in 2010 (relatively the same as in the previous SIM surveys), it was.1 in Europe. In 2011 the European IT budget as percent of revenues increased to 6.6 whereas U.S. decreased to.55. This year s survey showed a decreased figure of 6.11% for Europe and increased figure for U.S. with 4.94%. An examination by industry reveals that some sectors, such as Information Technology business services, banking/finance, and education/publishing, have IT budgets of more than 5% of their revenue. On the other hand, sectors with IT budgets which are less than 5 % of their revenue are manufacturing, Government, Transportation and Pharmaceutical/ healthcare. Finance/Banking/Insurance and Information Technology industries invest over 10% of revenue on IT. The industry breakdown is comparatively consistent across geographies implicating that the IT support is mostly industry based instead of geographic or organization specific. This also implies that usage of benchmark for IT budget as percent of revenues is globally valid but industry specific (table ).
15 4. IT Staffing and Compensation Considerations It is clear that staffing (internal and external) remains the largest component of IT budgets (57% in Europe and 56% in the U.S.). The domestic sourcing budgets for internal staff are 21% in Europe compared with % in the U.S. Offshore internal staff accounts for around 6% of the IT budget in the U.S., and 1% in Europe. Europe has a relatively high percent of their staff outsourced domestically (11%) when compared with the U.S. (8%). The European outsourced staff domestic is projected to stay at 11% in 201 and the European outsourced staff offshore to increase to 6% (currently 4%). When it comes to the allocated percentage of the IT budget for training/ education growth is anticipated for 201. The percentage of budget allocated for training/education declined in 2011 from 2.8 in 2010 to 2.65 in 2011 and 2.4% in 2012, but is now expected to be 2.57 in 201. Despite this grow the European continent spends less on training and education than U.S. spending.48 in 2010,.2 in 2011, 2.87 in 2012 and expected to be 2.99 in 201. Regarding IT staff salaries, 8% of the European IT employees earned more in 2012 in comparison with 2011, 12% earned less. The increase in IT staff salaries is less than the U.S. where 60% earned more in 2012 in comparison to 2011. But still 2011 was a better year with regards to actual IT staff salaries in comparison with 2010, where 62% of the European IT staff salaries were either fixed or less. 201 is projected to be a better year in which 4% of the IT staff can expect to have an increase in salary and 51% can expect no change. Lastly, with regards to the rate of IT staff turnover there is surprisingly good staff retention rates across the globe during the economic downturn. In Europe staff turnover in 2012 was 4.66%; in 2011 it was 5.56% in comparison with 5.82% in 2010. In the U.S. staff turnover was 5.5% in both 2011 and 2010; this year s turnover rate was 5.2. This staff retention rate is likely due to the recession making it difficult for staff to find more lucrative positions elsewhere, as well as the difficulty boomers are having in retiring.
4. IT Organization Considerations 16 This section discusses the survey findings related to IT organizational structure and CIOs. 1. IT Organization Structure The organization structure of IT can have a major impact on the performance of the company. IT organization structure is the degree to which it is centralized, decentralized, or federated. 65.6% (see figurer below) of European and 61% of the U.S. respondents indicated centralized in 2012. IT organization structure, where all IT reports to a single IT executive (the CIO). Centralized IT organization structure can better attain more IT standardization across the organization; for example, a centralized email system ensures the same email features across the enterprise (same look and feel, same capabilities, centralized archive and back up policies, etc.). Often costs are a major reason to centralize IT aiming for scale of economics. IT organization structure Europe Centralized Decentralized Federated / Hybrid Matrixed Networked 260= 248= 264= 12= 0= 6= 100= 156= 92= 16= 8= 0= 12= 0= 8= % 0% 9% 4% 2% 0 % 0% 0% 25% 2% 4% 65% 64% 66% 2010 2011 2012
IT organization structure Europe (country perspective) Netherlands Belgium Italy Spain U.K. France Germany Norway 70+20+180+0+40= 620+90+260+0= 600+40+0+0= 710+20+70= 690+60+180+70= 550+70+80= 680+220+100= 60+640= Networked Matrixed Federated / Hybrid Decentralized Centralized 17 On the other end of the spectrum, there are decentralized organizational structures where each business unit has its own IT organization without much coordination across business units (for example, each unit having their own email system, or their own standards for database administration). There is not much economy of scale in the decentralized structure, but each business unit has the full flexibility to focus on the unit s particular IT needs (applications and infrastructure). This can be of most value in large organizations where IT needs across some business units vary greatly. Some universities, for example, can benefit from decentralized IT structure, as each school or department might have vastly different IT requirements. 9% of the investigated European companies indicated a decentralized IT structure. % of U.S. respondents indicated a decentralized IT structure., a big drop from 9.5% in 2009 (Luftman and Ben-Zvi, 2010a). This drop could be the result of a radical response to the recession, in which many of the U.S. CIOs have opted for economies of scale over flexibility of business units in order to rein in their IT expenditures. European companies seem to favor decentralized IT organizations in order to gain flexibility. A federated (or hybrid) structure can realize the benefits from both centralized and decentralized structures. Corporate-wide standards are enforced in an effort to maximize the benefits of economies of scale, while providing flexibility to business units to maximize unique application opportunities at the business unit level. 2% of the European companies and % of the U.S. companies were reported as federated in 2012. Organizations with a federated structure tend to have a higher alignment maturity assessment than those that are centralized or decentralized (Luftman et al., 2010). With both the economic crisis as well as the opportunity to gain a higher level of alignment it should not come as a surprise to see these numbers increase over in the last few years. The IT organizational structures currently used per country are displayed as well. Interesting is that NL, UK, Germany and Spain have a high level of centralization. In Norway a federated IT organization is dominant, which, possibly, makes IT and business alignment a lower ranked IT management concern (ranked 5th); U.K. ranked IT and business alignment 6th. All other countries placed IT and business alignment in the top 5 management concerns. Looking at the increasing centralized and decentralized organizational structures it is to be expected that alignment will be a top 5 management concern for a number of years. The choices for different organizational structures are possibly a result of cost cutting.
5. CIO Trends 18 1. CIO Reporting Structure and Role of CIO Europe CIO reporting structure As the majority of time of CIOs is spent in dealing with non-technical issues, the roles of CIOs vary between the geographies surveyed. Figure: CIO reporting structure Europe (left = 2010, middle and right is 2012) The figure above presents where CIOs (or senior IT executives) report. Previous research has shown that, on average, organizations in which CIOs report to CEOs have higher alignment maturity than those reporting to non-ceo executives (Luftman and Ben-Zvi, 2010b, Luftman et al., 2010). CIOs reporting to the CEO is the highest in Asia (68%- 2010). Europe is currently decreasing the direct reporting to CEOs (51% in comparison with 57% in 2011) which implies the CEO focuses on other priorities for the organization and trusting the COO and board of directors for the IT part. Historically IT was seen as a cost center and more often the CIO reported to the CFO. This reporting structure decreased as well which indicates that IT organizations are less and less seen as a cost center. CEO CFO COO BUE Board of Directors 60= 456= 408= 216= 216= 168= 88= 64= 80= 40= 40= 40= 96= 64= 104= 11% 8% 5% 5% 5% 10% 8% 12% 1% 21% 27% 27% 45% 51% 57% 2010 2011 2012
19 Europe CIO hired from... 2. CIO Tenure The average CIO tenure is on the rise in Europe as well as abroad. This trend has been clearly illustrated in previous SIM surveys with the average CIO tenure of 4.6 years in 2009, 4. years in 2008, 4.1 years in 2007, and.6 years in 2006. In 2012, the respondents reported in Europe that CIOs held their positions on average 5.99 years in comparison with 4. years in 2010 and 5.04 in 2011. Even though it is believed that high CIO turnover (short tenure) makes it difficult for CIOs to address any longterm changes to the business or IT organization (Luftman and Ben-Zvi, 2010b), other research shows executive performance peaks between four and five years of tenure, after which the performance is likely to dip before another performance increase for executives with tenure of more than eight years (O Shannassy, 2011). The same research shows the optimum executive tenure to be either between four to six years, or tenures longer than eight years (O Shannassy, 2011). It is noted that this recent study was for CEOs and board of directors, with an average tenure of 8 years, and not specifically for CIOs. A similar study focusing on IT executives would be an interesting and welcome addition to the body of literature in this area. The survey also asked respondents to indicate where CIOs were hired from. within your company s IT organization outside your company from an external IT organization within your company but outside of IT outside your company from an organization outside of IT The figure above shows a significant change in hiring the CIO from within the companies IT organization to hiring from an external IT organization. This change might be a consequence of the economic downturn as well. For 2011 this was likely because an externally hired CIO is more willingly to implement more dramatic changes during the economic downturn. In 2012 another change can be seen using more people within the organization. 80= 10= 50= 540= 610= 470= 47% 40= 40= 100= 4% 4% 40= 0= 90= 4% % 10% 9% 1% 8% 5% 54% 61% 2010 2011 2012
20. CIO Time on Activities Predictably CIOs spend most of their time dealing with non-technical issues; 78% in 2012 in comparison to 8% in 2011. Interestingly, CIO time spent on software development issues is around %-6% across all the geographies. Relationship management is most time consuming for the European CIO s and is 0% of the CIO time of which 17% towards business and 1% towards IT staff. But despite 0% a drastic reduction of the CIO s time can be seen compared to 2011 where 7% of the time was spend in relationship management. This might be a direct result with the reduced IT budgets and the well known assignment: less with more. Within the European area Human Resource Management & Strategy the needed CIO time is consistent in 2012 in comparison to 2011 and 2010. U.S. CIOs spend 18% of their time on operations and architecture; the European CIOs spend even less time, only 17% in 2012. The time spend is significantly lower in both Europe and U.S. in comparison with other regions. The time spend on operations and architecture might be a good indicator of the maturity of this area where it is expected that U.S. and Europe have a high level of maturity as a result of implementing ITIL / ISO 20,000. Also interesting is the increase of CIO time spent in both IT governance and vendor relationship management. This might indicate a first shift to other IT governance structures using cloud computing.
CIO time spend Europe US 2011 21 Architecture 210= 7% 150= 6% 210= 7% 6% Human resource 00= 10% 00= 10% 00= 10% 7% IT Governance 00= 10% 60= 12% 0= 11% 9% Non-IT 480= 16% 150= 5% 270= 9% 7% Operations 60= 12% 240= 8% 00= 10% 12% Relationship Management with Business 450= 15% 660= 22% 510= 17% 20% Relationship Management with IT Staff 240= 8% 450= 15% 90= 1% 12% Relationship Management with Vendors 240= 8% 00= 10% 270= 9% 7% Software Development Strategy 120= 4% 90= % 150= 5% 00= 10% 00= 10% 00= 10% 2010 2011 2012 5% 15%
P+4+5+12+20+24 A+2+6+15+19+18 6. IT Outsourcing 22 IT outsourcing has been defined as handing over the management of some or all of an organization s IT assets, resources and related services to a third party (Willcocks et al., 1995). Over the last two decades, IT outsourcing has not only been an attractive option for many corporations, but also subject of significant academic research (Derksen, 201). IT leaders globally have long been looking to outsourcing as a means to reduce costs as well as to fill skills gaps. The recent recession has fueled this even further; the overall increase in outsourcing in all of the areas is a testimony to that, when considering total outsourcing, which includes offshoring, near-shoring, and consulting of non-internal staff. The No-onshore outsourcing in Europe is expected to decrease to 40%. For all investigated activities except helpdesk (e.g., running existing systems applications, building new systems applications and running infrastructure) the IT offshore outsourcing allocation is expected to be lower in 201 than in 2012. This indicates that building and running systems applications as well as running infrastructure are activities that a growing number of organizations are looking to source domestically. 2012 European outsourcing is largely nearshore with 64% of the outsourcing budget allocated within Europe. India is the most popular offshore country receiving 27% of the European offshore outsourcing budget. The other offshore countries are far less (China, Brazil and Mexico 1%). The differences with the U.S. are mainly determined looking at the European Nearshore activities. U.S. offshore outsourcing budget allocated by geography for Europe is only 12% in comparison with the 64% realized by European organizations. 40+ 5+ IT offshore outsourcing allocation 2012 (actual) Helpdesk 6% US 5% Running infrastructure / Data Center 15% US 12% Building new applications/services 19% US 20% Management consulting 2% US 4% No offshore outsourcing 41% US 5% Maintaining existing systems applications 18% US 24%
Concluding remarks The rather slow recovery from the relatively persistent recession poses new challenges to IT executives around the globe. The relatively consistent top managerial concerns cannot simply be addressed through identical responses in different geographies; each area has its own set of characteristics, and appropriate response to management concerns. In other words, unique characteristics of the local markets influence management responses of enterprises operating in a globally-linked environment. While the expected recovery from the recession presents new challenges and opportunities for IT executives in 201 and 2014, IT executives are set to leverage both global and local IT opportunities (such as increased spending and hiring, business intelligence, virtualization, and outsourcing) to overcome not only global challenges but also local IT and business challenges. 2 By comparing and contrasting Europe and the U.S., this research has identified the many similarities and dissimilarities that confront managers. Clearly there are regional influences that are powerful enough to reduce the influence of global trends such as nearshore versus offshore and the investments in applications & technologies with regards to IT reliability and efficiency. In closing, it is important to point out that IT managers are working in a highly interconnected world, and therefore certain patterns in different geographic locations are evident. However, this research found while there are many similarities there are also important local trends that managers must be sensitive to. References Derksen, B. (2011). Trends in Business & IT 2012/201: Richten, inrichten & verrichten met Business & IT., 17nd edition, Business & IT Trends Institute, South- Holland, Leiden. Derksen, B (201). Impact of IT Outsourcing on Business & IT Alignment, Business & IT Trends Institute, South Holland, Leiden. Luftman, J. and Ben-Zvi, T. 2011. Strategic Alignment Maturity and Company Performance: A Structural Equation Model Validation, Unpublished working paper, Stevens Institute of Technology. Luftman, J.N. ( 200): Competing in the information age: align in the sand, 2 nd edition, Oxford University Press. Luftman, J.N., Ben-Zvi, T., (2011): Key Issues for IT executives 2011: Cautious optimism in uncertain economic times. MIS Quarterly Executive Vol. 10. No. 4 / Dec 2011. Poels, R. ( 2006): Beïnvloeden en meten van Business & IT alignment, PhD dissertation. University Amsterdam (VU), North-Holland, Amsterdam. Treacy, M., Wiersema, F. (1992): Customer Intimicay and Other Value Disciplines, Harvard Business Review, reprint 9107.
Authors Jerry Luftman Ph.D. SIM VP Chapter Relations & Academic Affairs & NJ Chapter President Emeritus Professor & Executive Director Global Institute for IT Management jluftman@globaliim.com Prof.dr. Barry Derksen MMC CISA CGEIT Head of Architecture, BI & Processes department (Stedin) professor at NOVI University of Applied Sciences Research director (Business & IT Trends Institute) barry.derksen@bitti.nl The top five IT management concerns within Europe Business productivity and cost reduction Business & IT alignment Business agility and speed to market IT cost reduction IT reliability and efficiency The five most influential technologies for Europe Business Intelligence Cloud Computing Apps developments Enterprise Resource Planning Customer Relation Management The importance of the impact of IT on organizations around the world, especially in light of the global economic crisis, has amplified the need to provide a better understanding of the specific geographic similarities and differences of important IT managerial and technical trends. The economic conundrum is especially harsh in Europe, and like in the U.S. it is having a profound impact on decisions pertaining to IT. Going beyond identifying these economic implications is the need to understand the considerations for leveraging the impact of transformational new technologies, especially as the world becomes more globally-linked. By comparing Europe to the United States (U.S.), this paper presents the important information management and technology trends (e.g., management concerns, emerging technologies, budgets/spending, organizational considerations) necessary to prepare IT leaders for the challenges that await them. While the research initiative collected data from four geographic regions (United States, Europe, Asia, and Latin America), this paper focuses on the analysis comparing Europe and the U.S. The same questionnaire (albeit translated for the respective respondents), based on the lead authors wellrespected and long-running Society for Information Management (SIM) IT Trends survey, was applied across geographies. This paper presents the major findings based on survey responses from 501 organizations (195 U.S. and 06 European (mainly West Europe)) in mid to end 2012. Including the other continents 758 organizations were involved. About CIONET We are CIONET, the biggest community of IT executives in Europe. Bringing What s next. together over 500 CIOs, CTO s and IT directors from wide ranging sectors, cultures, academic backgrounds and generations, CIONET s membership represents an impressive body of expertise in IT management. CIONET s mission is to feed and develop that expertise by providing top-level IT executives with the resources they need to realise their full potential. CIONET develops, manages and moderates an integrated array of tools and services from the online CIONET platform the world s first social network for CIOs to a range of offline networking events, conferences, workshops and executive education programmes all tailored to top-level management. CIONET also provides exclusive access to the latest research through regular online and offline publications and a number of value adding partnerships with key players from the academic and corporate worlds. Faced with the rapidly changing role of today s IT executive, CIONET not only helps its members keep up with the pace of change but empowers them to take an active role in shaping the future of their field, always challenging them with What s next.