DOCSIS 3.1: WHAT IS IT, HOW DOES IT WORK, AND HOW CAN YOU PREPARE FOR IT? Daniel Howard, SCTE CTO July 16, 2013



Similar documents
DOCSIS 3.1. High Level Overview at NANOG 59. Karthik Sundaresan, Lead Architect. Oct 09, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.

Proactive Network Maintenance for EPoC

istock.com / alengo Broadcast and media Focus

CX380X Advanced Spectrum and Burst QAM Analyzer

E P o C. IEEE P802.3bn Tutorial. Part 1. EPON Protocol Over Coax EPoC. Monday, 3 November 2014

Making Room for DOCSIS 3.1 and EPoC Is your cable plant ready for an OFDM world? Author - Phil Miguelez ARRIS

DS2800. Broadband. Spectrum Analyzer. Key Benefits CUSTOMER PREMISE HFC DS

Deviser DS2800 Handheld Digital TV Spectrum Analyser

1550 Video Overlay for FTTH

Technical Training Seminar on Practical Field Testing DOCSIS 3.0 for CCTA Member Companies August 24, 25 and 26, 2010 San Juan, Puerto Rico

VDSL2 A feasible Solution for Last Mile

Channel Bandwidth, MHz. Symbol Rate, Msym/sec

Cisco Cable Radio Frequency (RF) FAQs

Next Steps in the Evolution of the Broadband Network

Achieving New Levels of Channel Density in Downstream Cable Transmitter Systems: RF DACs Deliver Smaller Size and Lower Power Consumption

How To Define Hfc Technology

DOCSIS 3.1. Application Note. Products: R&S CLGD R&S FSW

Cable Network Overview. Presented by: Ma1 Schmi1 (CableLabs)

Cable 101. A Broadband Telecommunications Primer for Non-technical Personnel

Channel Bonding in DOCSIS 3.0. Greg White Lead Architect Broadband Access CableLabs

DVB-C2 a new Transmission System for Hybrid Fibre Coax Networks

Revision of Lecture Eighteen

4 Digital Video Signal According to ITU-BT.R.601 (CCIR 601) 43

DOCSIS EoC for EPON in China

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. LAB 1 - Introduction to USRP

Study on the Network Termination Point of Internet access and Telephony over Cable Networks (HFC)

Delaware Valley SCTE Comparing RF-over-Glass to HFC. Bill Dawson VP Business Development ARRIS Access & Transport bill.dawson@arrisi.

Time and Frequency Domain Equalization

Universal Wideband Edge QAM Solution. A New Way to Manage the Edge and Future-Proof Your Network

SC-FDMA and LTE Uplink Physical Layer Design

RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE AND CAPACITY REDUCTION IN DSL

(Refer Slide Time: 2:10)

Digital Signals and Testing

Broadband 101: Installation and Testing

MODULATION Systems (part 1)

INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND TRANSMISSION MEDIA

E-Option Multi-taps Conditioning at the Tap

Digital Transmission: Carrier-to-Noise Ratio, Signalto-Noise Ratio, and Modulation Error Ratio. January 2012

GTER 26 tudo o que você. quer saber sobre n

ITU-T RECOMMENDATION J.122, SECOND-GENERATION TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS FOR INTERACTIVE CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES IP CABLE MODEMS

SC-FDMA for 3GPP LTE uplink. Hong-Jik Kim, Ph. D.

ETSI TS V1.1.1 ( ) Technical Specification

FPGAs in Next Generation Wireless Networks

NRZ Bandwidth - HF Cutoff vs. SNR

A Performance Study of Wireless Broadband Access (WiMAX)

DSAM Digital Quality Index (DQI) A New Technique for Assessing Downstream Digital Services

Module: Digital Communications. Experiment 784. DSL Transmission. Institut für Nachrichtentechnik E-8 Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg

Cable Modems. Definition. Overview. Topics. 1. How Cable Modems Work

Increasing cable bandwidth to retain high-value customers

Harnessing the Power of HFC Node Facility

Hot Issues in Wireless Broadband Networking

How Enhanced DSL Technologies Optimize the Last Copper Mile By John Williams

TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS ADVISORY COMMITTEE WORKING GROUP ON COMMON CONNECTION STANDARDS (CCS)

Data Transmission. Data Communications Model. CSE 3461 / 5461: Computer Networking & Internet Technologies. Presentation B

TROUBLESHOOTING VOICE-OVER-IP (VOIP) IMPAIRMENTS IN A DOCSIS NETWORK

Introduction to Wireless LAN Measurements

Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Transmission Methods

International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering. Research Paper Volume-4, Issue-4 E-ISSN:

Example: Multiple OFDM Downstream Channels and Examining Backwards Compatibility. Mark Laubach, Avi Kliger Broadcom

The Effect of Network Cabling on Bit Error Rate Performance. By Paul Kish NORDX/CDT

Chapter 9 Using Telephone and Cable Networks for Data Transmission

Application Note Noise Frequently Asked Questions

DSAM Digital Services Activation Meter

Module 13 : Measurements on Fiber Optic Systems

EPON over Coax. RF Spectrum Ad Hoc Status Report. Steve Shellhammer (Qualcomm)

Ajay Gummalla-July 2001

MoCA Testing for triple play and Whole Home DVR. Jim Carvajal Applications Specialist, Cable MSO Caribbean & Latin America

OFDM, Mobile Software Development Framework

SECTION 2 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF BPL SYSTEMS

LTE UE RF measurements An introduction and overview

MIMO detector algorithms and their implementations for LTE/LTE-A

802.11ad - WLAN at 60 GHz A Technology Introduction White Paper

PAPR and Bandwidth Analysis of SISO-OFDM/WOFDM and MIMO OFDM/WOFDM (Wimax) for Multi-Path Fading Channels

Next Generation of High Speed. Modems8

Broadband Technology Clinic. Burlington Telecom Advisory Board

White paper. Data over Coax

Public Switched Telephone System

18-759: Wireless Networks Lecture 18: Cellular. Overview

COMPARING THE DOCSIS 3.1 AND HFC EVOLUTION TO THE FTTH REVOLUTION

VSE The all-new digital spectrum/video analyzer and noise troubleshooter

MATRIX TECHNICAL NOTES

T = 1 f. Phase. Measure of relative position in time within a single period of a signal For a periodic signal f(t), phase is fractional part t p

FCC CABLE RULES Technical Standards

BENEFITS OF USING MULTIPLE PLP IN DVB-T2

Bandwidth demand forecasting (for TR section 4.2.2)

Chapter 6 Bandwidth Utilization: Multiplexing and Spreading 6.1

Fujitsu Gigabit Ethernet VOD Solutions

: Instructor

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

Network and Technology. John Schanz Executive Vice President National Engineering and Technology Operations Comcast Cable

Cisco Model DPC3010 DOCSIS 3.0 8x4 Cable Modem

Configuring Load Balancing and Dynamic Channel Change (DCC) on the Cisco CMTS

MoCA 1.1 Specification for Device RF Characteristics

RF Measurements Using a Modular Digitizer

A new frequency plan and power deployment rules

DOCSIS 3.0 Broadband Intelligence Using IPDR to maximize new service opportunities

GSM/EDGE Output RF Spectrum on the V93000 Joe Kelly and Max Seminario, Verigy

Digital Modulation. David Tipper. Department of Information Science and Telecommunications University of Pittsburgh. Typical Communication System

ADSL part 2, Cable Internet, Cellular

ADVANCED APPLICATIONS OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

Transcription:

DOCSIS 3.1: WHAT IS IT, HOW DOES IT WORK, AND HOW CAN YOU PREPARE FOR IT? Daniel Howard, SCTE CTO July 16, 2013

VIDEO

PART 1: OFDM BUSINESS DRIVERS MAIN OBJECTIVES: As we go through Part 1 of today s lecture, you should be able to answer the following questions: What are the options in multiplexing today's data signals to the customer? What are the business, market and technology drivers for OFDM in cable? Why move beyond QAM 256? What are the options for higher order modulation? How will DOCSIS 3.1 with OFDM enable operators to deliver higher speed data services and increase the capacity of their HFC access networks? What makes OFDM especially well suited to deliver wider effective channels?

BUSINESS DRIVERS FOR OFDM ON HFC In a phrase: MORE HFC CAPACITY IS NEEDED! Market drivers: Business services, Over The Top (OTT) video, 4K video, 3DTV, etc. Economic drivers: Decrease cost per bit transmitted How much capacity do we need? 10 Gb/s downstream or greater 1 Gb/s upstream or greater Flexibility requirement: Need easy adaptation to different amounts of spectrum and plant conditions

HOW TO GET MORE CAPACITY? Higher orders of modulation (HOM) 256-QAM 4096-QAM Elimination/reduction of RF guard bands Greater capacity achieved primarily through LDPC (HOM in clean channel) and OFDM (elimination of guard bands and HOM in impaired channels) Close to 2x improvement over DOCSIS 3.0

Sub-carrier - 256 QAM Sub-carrier - 256 QAM Sub-carrier - 512 QAM Sub-carrier - 512 QAM Sub-carrier - 1024 QAM Sub-carrier - 4096 QAM Sub-carrier - 4096 QAM Sub-carrier - 1024 QAM NO WASTED CAPACITY: OFDM ADAPTIVE BIT LOADING OFDM D/S PHY channel

HIGHER ORDER MODULATION OPTIONS Why not just add LDPC to Single Carrier (SC) QAM to get higher order modulation? Guardbands and robustness! Other reasons for going to OFDM: Easier channel synthesis Less complex than MAC layer bonding Channel equalization (EQ) is simpler Incremental capacity addition Better economies of scale Attract new chipset and system vendors to cable market

PART 2: ENGINEERING DETAILS MAIN OBJECTIVES: As we go through Part 2 of today s lecture, you will be able to answer the following questions: How does OFDM differ from conventional FDM, ATDMA, and S-CDMA? How are the subcarriers orthogonal to each other in OFDM? How and why is the IFFT used in defining the OFDM waveform? How are pilot tones and the cyclic prefix used in OFDM? How does OFDM optimize the modulation order used in RF spectrum? Why makes OFDM better than S-CDMA and ATDMA in general? GLOSSARY: FDM: Frequency Division Multiplexing ATDMA: Advanced Time Division Multiple Access IFFT: Inverse Fast Fourier Transform S-CDMA: Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access OFDM: Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing

THE OFDM CONCEPT OFDM sub-carriers can be packed tightly without interfering with each other And they fall off faster at band edges SC-QAM OFDM

ORTHOGONALITY DEFINED Mathematical orthogonality: f b, g f ( x) g( x) dx a 0 In communications, orthogonality means zero interference with each other at the receiver sampling instant Orthogonality in communications is typically in one of these domains: temporal, frequency, code, or spatial

ORTHOGONALITY EXAMPLES: TDMA i-th Burst Ramp-down time Timing-phase difference Dt s Guard time at CMTS receiver: Symbol period (i+1)-th Burst Ramp-up time

ORTHOGONALITY EXAMPLES: S-CDMA CODE DOMAIN Code 1 Code 1 Data stream 1 Spreading De-spreading Data stream 1 Data stream 2 Code 2 Spreading + RF Channel Code 2 De-spreading Data stream 2 Code N Code N Data stream N Spreading De-spreading Data stream N

ORTHOGONALITY EXAMPLES: S-CDMA TIMING SYNCH i-th Burst Ramp-down time Timing-phase difference nearly 0 Chip period Guard time at CMTS receiver may be 0 (i+1)-th Burst Ramp-up time

OFDM ORTHOGONALITY rect(t) transforms to sin(f)/f or sinc(f) time F frequency Precise frequency spacing Df = k, k = 1 typically t

HOW OFDM DATA IS TRANSMITTED VIA IFFT This e +j 0 n D(k) D(k) e +j 1 n e +j N-1 n + Channel D(k) is mathematically equivalent to this: N 1 k 0 D( k) e j2 nk/ N IFFT N ( n, D)

Serial to Parallel Parallel to Serial OFDM TX BLOCK DIAGRAM Data bits Scrambler Error Correction Encode Interleaver Symbol Map (bits to QAM) IFFT Cyclic Prefix to RF upconverter

OFDM CYCLIC PREFIX copy Symbol n-1 Symbol n Symbol n+1 Cyclic Prefix N-point IFFT Output

OFDM SYNCHRONIZATION Frequency Synchronization Error Other carriers do not cancel Clock Synchronization Error Initial synch is lost during sampling

PILOT TONES IN OFDM

BER PERFORMANCE IN AWGN These curves are the same for OFDM as for S-CDMA and ATDMA in an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel

PART 3: PERFORMANCE DETAILS MAIN OBJECTIVES: As we go through Part 3 of today s lecture, you will be able to answer the following questions: Why is OFDM better on the upstream in impulse and narrow band ingress? What are the advantages/disadvantages of OFDM? What are some key areas that cable operators can focus on when preparing to deploy OFDM in their networks? How will operators transition to OFDM and higher order QAM rates? What are the operational system and network implications of OFDM and its deployment?

OFDM S SECRET WEAPON Narrow subcarriers mean long symbols frequency Benefits are easy mitigation of: Micro-reflections 23 db tap (R=7 db) time +31 dbmv +30 dbmv 100 feet (1 db loss) +22 dbmv +23 dbmv +15 dbmv +14 dbmv 20 db tap (R=7 db) CA Node H41 0.02 0.015 Ingress, impulse and burst noise 0.01 0.005 0-0.005-0.01 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 x 10-4

BURST NOISE PERFORMANCE DETAILS FFT of oscilloscope capture of burst noise event on upstream -40-45 -50-55 -60-65 Same trace with burst noise event clipped out of time capture Reveals ingress and flatness of actual channel -70 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 x 10 7-35 -40-45 -50-55 -60-65 -70-75 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 x 10 7

HIGHLY ATTENUATED UPSTREAMS MDU cable modems can have highly attenuated upstreams S-CDMA and OFDM modulations allow Tx power to be concentrated on fewer tones (or codes in S-CDMA) SNR per tone is much higher Reduces burst rate, but keeps spectral efficiency high Normal power per tone Cable upstream frequency

HIGHER PEAK TO AVERAGE POWER RATIO OF OFDM OFDM has a high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), but so does a spectrum full of SC-QAM PAPR = ( x 2 ) peak x rms 2 PAPR can be reduced, but probably not necessary

PART 4: DEPLOYMENT PLANNING MAIN OBJECTIVES: As we go through Part 4 of today s lecture, you will be able to answer the following questions: How will operators transition to OFDM and higher order QAM rates? What are the operational system and network implications of OFDM and its deployment? What are some key areas that cable operators can focus on when preparing to deploy OFDM in their networks? How will the SCTE help operators deploy DOCSIS 3.1 OFDM in their networks?

OPERATION ON HFC NETWORKS Key aspects: Upstream spectrum remains below downstream CPE devices support current and future upstream splits CPE devices operate in current and future downstreams Deployment implications No plant changes required to deploy DOCSIS 3.1 equipment Future proof - no CPE or infrastructure swap required

EFFECTIVE MIGRATION STRATEGY Achieved primarily by including: Backward compatibility requirements Support for upgrades to DOCSIS 3.1 technology in CCAP How does that enable an effective migration strategy? Incremental deployment of DOCSIS 3.1 modems Continued use of DOCSIS 2.0 & 3.0 modems after 3.1 upgrades

DOCSIS 3.1 TECHNOLOGY - MIGRATION Backward compatibility Support of at least 24 bonded SC-QAMs in downstream and 8 in upstream S-CDMA in the upstream DOCSIS 3.1 CMs required to operate on DOCSIS 3.0 CMTSs DOCSIS 3.1 CMTSs required to support DOCSIS 3.0 (and 2.0) CMs To be implemented also with CCAP equipment Operation on existing HFC networks Upstream spectrum remains below downstream Supports operation with existing upstream splits (42/65 MHz as mostly in operation, 85 MHz as specified in DOCSIS 3.0) Supports spectrum enhancement in upstream (e.g. 200 MHz) and downstream (e.g. 1.2 GHz or even 1.7 GHz) Supports the ability to take advantage of enhanced capabilities when network, headend and CPE equipment permit

Headend CPE DOCSIS 3.1 Use Cases DOCSIS 3.0 CM DOCSIS 3.1 CM Few 1.0/1.1 Lots of 2.0 Some 3.0 Remove 1.0/1.1 More 3.0 Many 3.0 First 3.1 Lots of 3.0 More 3.1 Lots of 3.1 Reduction of 2.0 Today Soon 3.1 CM 3.1 DS CCAP 3.1 US CCAP Better HFC 5-65 MHz US 3.0 CMTS DS Bonding 3.0 CCAP More DS Bonding US Bonding S-CDMA 3.0 CCAP More DS & US Bonding 3.1 CCAP First 3.1 DS OFDM DS Expansion First 3.1 US OFDMA US & DS Expansion DOCSIS 3.0 CMTS/CCAP Considerations when introducing DOCSIS 3.1 DOCSIS 3.0 CCAP before DOCSIS 3.1 available First DOCSIS 3.1 CM with DOCSIS 3.0 CCAP Introducation of DOCSIS 3.1 DS in CCAP via Firmware Upgrade Introducation of DOCSIS 3.1 US in CCAP via Line Card swap Expansion of frequency range particularly in US very complex DOCSIS 3.1 CMTS/CCAP (Source: CableLabs, Comcast)

TOWARDS FTTH? Residential Services Business Services DOCSIS 3.0 Channel Bonding EPON / GPON / P2P CCAP High-density Headend Distributed Architecture DOCSIS 3.1 New PHY EPoC Time All Fiber

SCTE SUPPORT FOR DOCSIS 3.1 SCTE engineering support to 3.1 spec development DOCSIS training/certification update for 3.1 Other content DOCSIS 3.1 landing zone: SCTE Standards SCTE recommended practice documents New SCTE HFC readiness working group Symposium on 3.1/HFC readiness

SCTE HFC READINESS SPECIAL WORKING GROUP (SWG) Goal: Accelerate deployment of 3.1 Output: Best practices documents for optimizing network capacity with DOCSIS 3.x Kickoff meeting 24 May 2013 Phase 1: Optimizing loaded DOCSIS 3.0 networks Delivery: 1 Sep 2013 Phase 2: Optimizing loaded DOCSIS 3.1 networks Measurement project to be undertaken Procedures being written up for MSOs Webinar planned to demonstrate procedures SWG team as backup to do measurements

PHASE 1 GENERAL ISSUES How fully loaded D3.0 network capacity is affected by equipment performance limits and plant impairments Planning and optimization recommendations Recommendations for network equipment and monitoring equipment How to configure, monitor, and maintain a fully utilized DOCSIS 3.0 upstream and downstream

SWG TOPICS FOR PHASE 1 DOCUMENT Laser linearity and dynamic range (headroom) Noise measurement recommendation (Measurements for accurate noise/interference diagnostics) Impairment visibility on fully loaded plants Effect of changing signal levels (increase for High Order Modulation, distortion, etc) Educating the workforce for High order Modulation with existing equipment (new tools) Availability of test & diagnostics equipment (to add intelligence and higher measurement resolution) LTE ingress, TV white space, satellite and MoCA Minimum standards for plant & maintenance (+evolution) Beyond MER (higher order moments in measurements) Dynamic modulation rollback and proactive network maintenance (PNM) actions Best mix of SCDMA and ATDMA Improve Home/Biz/MDU installation practices (certificate of install, better records, trends/tracking, operations and field) Impairment library, map to migration strategy Better CMTS metrics Configuration/optimization planning (CMTS, plant specific, key knobs)

TUTORIALS IN PHASE 1 DOCUMENT Upstream laser characterization using D3.0 bonded carriers Steady state ingress, transient noise, and high levels of collisions in contention mini-slots with modern equipment (VSA, DSO, CMTS) RF spectral power density considerations for the upstream: Constant power per Hz, constant power per carrier, other power profiles, and other methods to optimize total upstream capacity Correlation of RF leakage measurements to downstream and upstream ingress and transient noise estimation; and New measurement procedures oriented towards determining how best to maximize the capacity of fully loaded DOCSIS 3.x networks.

IMPACT OF INGRESS AND CONTENTION COLLISIONS ON UPSTREAM LASER Amplitude (dbmv) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 -20-25 -30-35 -40 6 14 22 30 38 46 54 62 70 78 86 Frequency (MHz)

DYNAMIC RANGE VS. LASER TYPE

Amplitude (dbmv) IMPAIRMENT VISIBILITY OUT OF BAND 20 Transient Noise on Return Node 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 -20-25 -30-35 -40 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 Frequency (MHz)

HOMEPLUG INTERFERENCE SEEN ON UPSTREAM

WHAT TO MEASURE Attenuation and thermal noise in the channel vs. transmit power limit Capabilities of existing optics Frequency response/micro-reflections Ingress, impulse and burst noise Non-linear impairments (CSO, CTB)

LONG TERM REQUIREMENTS Objectives of 10 Gbit/s DS and 1 Gbit/s US capacity requires more RF spectrum 1.2-1.5 GHz on the downstream, 200-400 MHz on the upstream Highest availability and capacity may ultimately require Better DFB cooled downstream lasers Higher powered upstream lasers Improved passives and RF amplifiers These improvements can be done surgically, only on nodes where needed Characterizing current plant performance will determine how close an MSO can come to the objectives with minor to moderate tweaks to the existing HFC Infrastructure

REFERENCES / FOR MORE INFO OFDM basics tutorial http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/rf-technology-design/ofdm/ofdm-basics-tutorial.php What is OFDM (Hranac) http://www.cablefax.com/cfp/ct/news/ctreports/commentary/what-is-ofdm_55404.html OFDM FAQ/Tutorial http://mobiledevdesign.com/tutorials/ofdm/ OFDM Tutorial http://www.complextoreal.com/chapters/ofdm2.pdf DVB-C2: Revolutionising RF Bandwidths Utilization in Cable http://www.ict-redesign.eu/fileadmin/documents/1003_scte_broadband_dvb-c2.pdf OFDM and the orthogonality principle http://www.ice.rwth-aachen.de/research/algorithms-projects/ofdm/ofdm-and-the-orthogonality-principle/ Wikipedia entry on OFDM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/orthogonal_frequency-division_multiplexing The principles of OFDM (RF Design) http://rfdesign.com/images/archive/0101puegel30.pdf OFDM Overview (Va Tech) http://www.mprg.org/research/ofdm/index.html OFDM Uncovered Part 1: The Architecture http://www.eetimes.com/design/communications-design/4141953/ofdm-uncovered-part-1-the-architecture

SCTE DOCSIS AND PHY LAYER LEARNING RESOURCES Courses Channel Bonding in DOCSIS 3.0 http://www.scte.org/professional_development/channel_bonding_in_docsis_30_on_demand_description.aspx Coaxial Cable in the HFC Plant http://www.scte.org/professional_development/_coaxial_cable_in_the_hfc_plant.aspx Data Communications http://www.scte.org/professional_development/data_communications_description.aspx Digital Basics and DOCSIS Fundamentals http://www.scte.org/events/digital_basics_and_docsis%c2%ae_fundamentals_.aspx DOCSIS Systems http://www.scte.org/events/docsis%e2%84%a2_deployment_detail.aspx Return Path http://www.scte.org/events/return_path_detail.aspx Primers: What is LTE? http://www.scte.org/resources/scte_primers_for_download.aspx#lte What is Modulation? http://www.scte.org/resources/scte_primers_for_download.aspx#modulation