Asia/Pacific Airport Coordinators Association (APACA)



Similar documents
Asia/Pacific Airport Coordinators Association (APACA) Agenda Item 9. Reformatting of Worldwide Scheduling Guideline (WSG)

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.

REGULATION ON COMMON RULES FOR THE ALLOCATION OF SLOTS AND SCHEDULING COORDINATION AT AIRPORTS. Adoption of the European Union Regulations Article 2

FRAConnect Incentive program

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation.

UK SLOT ALLOCATION PROCESS AND CRITERIA

ATFM Line of Action 7 Consistency between Airport Slots, FPL and ATFM Slots

Enhanced Vessel Traffic Management System Booking Slots Available and Vessels Booked per Day From 12-JAN-2016 To 30-JUN-2017


Legislative Brief: PAY OR PLAY PENALTIES LOOK BACK MEASUREMENT METHOD EXAMPLES. EmPowerHR

Non-Utility Funding Opportunities For Agricultural and Food Processing Customers

Kuang-Yu Hu Senior Specialist, the First Department of Fair Trade Commission, Executive Yuan Taiwan

International Civil Aviation Organization WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE (ATCONF) SIXTH MEETING. Montréal, 18 to 22 March 2013

LAYMAN S GUIDE TO USING SSIM

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

360 Easy Payroll Services

SMS Implementation Study

Obtaining a Copy of this Interpretation

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Analysts and Investors conference call Q results 15 May 2014

INFORMATION FOR OBSERVERS. Project: IAS 39 and Business Combinations (Agenda Paper 7E)

Guidelines for Master's Theses

Life Insurance Contracts

Gloucestershire Health and Care Scrutiny Committee

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report March 2015

EASYJET TRADING STATEMENT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2014

Registered Actively Seeking Work May 2015

Assessment of changes to functional systems in ATM/ANS and the oversight thereof

Government proposals to reform vocational qualifications for year olds in England

BSB41015 CERTIFICATE IV IN HUMAN RESOURCES

Energy Savings from Business Energy Feedback

Air Service Training (Engineering) Ltd

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Impact assessment of revisions to Regulation 95/93. Final report (sections 1-12) March 2011

MODEL REGULATION SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REGULATION. International Civil Aviation Organisation

Resources and Capabilities Chicago

AIRLINE PASSENGER SERVICE COMMITMENT 28 March 2001

Information Session. For Fall 2015 and Spring 2016 Placements

Rules of Office of Administration Division 10 Commissioner of Administration Chapter 11 Travel Regulations

Case 2:08-cv ABC-E Document 1-4 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 138. Exhibit 8

VC ACADEMIC CALENDAR. Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat. Sum 11 wk. & Sum II Final Exams. Cancel Fall 16 wk. & Fall I Non-Pays

Accident Rate Comparisons

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

Oracle Premier Support Services

Compiled Accounting Standard AASB 102

1.231J/16.781J/ESD.224J Airport Systems Fall Demand Management. Amedeo R. Odoni. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments

CONTROLLING THE MISUSE OF SLOTS AT COORDINATED AIRPORTS IN THE UK MISUSE OF SLOTS ENFORCEMENT CODE

Analysts and Investors conference call Q results 21 August 2014

IRAS e-tax Guide INCOME TAX: TAX DEDUCTION FOR SHARES USED TO FULFILL OBLIGATIONS UNDER AN EMPLOYEE EQUITY-BASED REMUNERATION SCHEME

REPORT OF: DIRECTOR OF DEMOCRATIC AND LEGAL SERVICES 13/358 WARDS AFFECTED: ALL

Airport Safety and Construction Management Under The FAA

AC No. : AC/AW/006R02 Date : 15 Nov 13

Detailed guidance for employers

INFORMATION FOR OBSERVERS. Transaction Costs Deducted from Equity (Agenda Paper 6C)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. BSB41013 CERTIFICATE IV IN HUMAN RESOURCES 12 Week Course Information WEEK PROGRAM... 1

Commercial and Industrial Electric Rates

Certificate IV in Legal Services

AFRAA AIRLINE PASSENGER SERVICE COMMITMENT

KENORA CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Important Dates Calendar FALL

Guidance on the submission of ambulance and patient transport services Friends and Family Test data

City of Cardiff Council Improving Scrutiny Project: Project Brief, January 2015

DRAFT COMMENT LETTER. Comments should be sent to by 21 August 2009

INFORMATION FOR OBSERVERS. Project: IAS 19 Employee Benefits Settlements (Agenda Paper 7A)

Urgent Issues Group Interpretation 132 July Intangible Assets Web Site Costs

Aegean Airlines 2007 Review & Business Outlook. Analysts Conference Call February 20, 2008

ED191 sub March Kevin Stevenson Chairman Australian Accounting Standards Board PO Box 204 Collins St West MELBOURNE VIC 8007

REVIEW OF AIP SUPPLEMENT. (Presented by Singapore) Attached is a copy of the AIP SUPP for review by the Meeting.

Jeppesen Academy - Training Services 2014 GLOBAL COURSE SCHEDULE

MDM.032 working group Developing a concept for better regulation in General Aviation

2012 Application Guidelines for Japanese Government Scholarship- Funded International Students (Research Students) (University Recommendation)

Graduate Internships, Manager Guidelines

Open Invitation to Tender

Comments on the IASB Exposure Draft "Insurance Contracts

BETTER INFORMATION LEADS TO BETTER PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE DECISIONS

NEWARK AND SHERWOOD DISTRICT COUNCIL

Company and its 12. Page IN EQUITY T OF CASH FLOWS AUDIT REVIEW OUTLOOK DIVIDEND

London Luton Airport Document PPO5 Procedures for Requesting Prior Permission to Operate Version issued 25 th February 2009

APPENDIX 3B Financial Criteria for Retention on the Specialist List and Requirements for Acceptance of a Tender

Tax Consolidation Accounting

OR Applications in the Airline Industry

European AIS Database Developments of the EAD. Peter Matern Head of European AIM Unit

An Act. SECTION 1. AMENDATORY 36 O.S. 2011, Section , is amended to read as follows:

FLIGHT AND DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS FOR FLIGHT CREW OPERATIONS OTHER THAN COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORTATION BY AEROPLANES

The Victorian Transport Accident Scheme. Heather Evans General Manager, Strategy

The Impact of Medicare Part D on the Percent Gross Margin Earned by Texas Independent Pharmacies for Dual Eligible Beneficiary Claims

GOVERNING BODY MEETING held in public 29 July 2015 Agenda Item 4.4

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Professional Indemnity Claims Liabilities in Medical Defence Organisations

Heathrow and Dubai the World s Hub Airports

Accounting for Interests in Joint Operations structured through Separate Vehicles Consultation of the IFRS Interpretations Committee by the IASB

Qantas International Network Changes Frequently Asked Questions Trade

MODALITIES OF THE TARGETED LONGER-TERM REFINANCING OPERATIONS

Singapore Airlines Group Analyst/Media Briefing FY RESULTS 17 MAY 2013 THE PARENT AIRLINE FY2012/13 RESULTS

FEES AND CHARGES. For the use of Heliports and Airports in Greenland. G. Season Cards and Flights Using Closed Landing Grounds

Transcription:

Asia/Pacific Airport Coordinators Association (APACA) Agenda Item 8 Determination of Historic Slots and eligibility of historic precedence 1 st APACA meeting 13 November, 2010 Melbourne, Australia

Determination of Historic Slots (1) 1. Back ground JSAG has been discussing the content of 6.4.1 and Appendix 4 of WSG in order to maintain the conformity among airlines and coordinators on the determination of historic slots. The changes to 6.41. and Appendix 4 in the past can be found below. Although new text was approved at the last conference and incorporated into current WSG (20th edition), Appendix 4 was dropped from WSG (19th edition) and is still missing at this moment. WSG (16th edition) (Jul. 2008) WSG (17th edition) (Dec.2008) WSG (18th edition) (Aug. 2009) Section 6.4.1 Determination of Historics (only U/L calculation (80/20%)) Appendix 4 Notion of calculation base for U/L is explained. Calculation example was revised (More concrete example were introduced) WSG (19th edition) (Jan.2010) Dropped WSG (20th edition) (Aug. 2010) Determination of Historic Slots (Completely new text was introduced, 20% gap notion was explained first in the text) Dropped 2. Section 6.4.1 In this section, 20% gap notion was introduced. Two paragraphs under the Cancellations made before 31 August (Winter) and 31 January (Summer) are the completely new text. The paragraphs shown below will be effective as of 1st January 2011.

Determination of Historic Slots (2) The following section of 6.4.1 is effective as of 1st January 2011 Coordinators should use the following guidelines for determining which slots are eligible for historic precedence and the number of operations required to achieve 80% usage: A series of slots is eligible for historic precedence when the series has been operated at least 80% of the time in accordance with 6.10.7. The series of slots held by coordinators on 31 August (Winter) and 31 January (Summer) will be used as the basis for determination of eligibility for historic precedence. Where an airline holds more than one series of slots at the same time with identical or overlapping periods, then the usage of each series is calculated separately. If a flight operates on more than one day-of-week, then each day-of-week is considered as a separate series of slots. Time changes cleared by the coordinator for part of a series of slots (e.g., for daylight savings time) do not affect eligibility for historic precedence, provided at least 80% of the number of operations in the series is operated as cleared by the coordinator. Historic precedence applies to the latest timings approved by coordinators for a series of slots, unless otherwise agreed between the coordinator and airline. Ad hoc changes to a series of slots of aircraft type, flight number, route or service type do not affect eligibility for historic precedence. The 80% usage will be calculated for the total number of operations across all periods and historic precedence will normally apply to the series of slots as operated the majority of the time, unless otherwise agreed between the coordinator and airline.

Determination of Historic Slots (3) Cancellations made before 31 August (Winter) and 31 January (Summer) The cancellation of five or more consecutive weeks will reduce the period eligible for historic precedence or result in separate periods eligible for historic precedence. Where the separate periods are recognizably part of the same service (e.g., same flight number, route, etc.), then the 80% usage will be calculated for the total number of operations across all periods. The cancellation of periods less than five consecutive weeks does not reduce the period eligible for historic precedence, provided the total number of cancellations is less than 20% of the period between the first and last date of the series of slots. Cancellations made after 31 August (Winter) and 31 January (Summer) For a series of slots newly allocated after 31 August (Winter) and 31 January (Summer) that is eligible for historic precedence, the number of slots in the series at the date of first allocation forms the basis of the 80% usage calculation, unless otherwise agreed between the coordinator and airline. If the period of operation of a series of slots is extended after 31 August (Winter) and 31 January (Summer), then the airline is eligible for historic precedence for the extended period of operation, subject to the 80% usage requirement for the entire series inclusive of the increased number of operations. All cancellations made after 31 August (Winter) and 31 January (Summer) are considered as non-utilization of the series of slots in the 80% usage calculation, unless the non-utilization is justified on the basis of the provisions of 6.10.7. Slots allocated by coordinators as ad hoc are not eligible for historic precedence. However, slots requested as a series that are initially allocated as ad hoc, but which form a series of slots by the end of the scheduling period, may be eligible for historic precedence.

Appendix 4 (Under Deliberation (1)) 3. Appendix 4 Although the Appendix 4 is missing at this moment, the draft Appendix 4 under deliberation by JSAG is attached just for your information. This Appendix 4 is divided in to two parts in accordance with the cancellation of 5 or more than 5 weeks and less than 5 weeks. It should be noted that the consensus has not been reached yet among coordinators, even in EUACA coordinators group. (1) 5 or more than 5 cancellations The cancellation of five or more consecutive weeks will reduce the period eligible for historic precedence or result in separate periods eligible for historic precedence. Where the separate periods are recognizably part of the same service (e.g., same flight number, route, etc.), then the 80% usage will be calculated for the total number of operations across all periods. (2) Less than 5 weeks The cancellation of periods less than five consecutive weeks does not reduce the period eligible for historic precedence, provided the total number of cancellations is less than 20% of the period between the first and last date of the series of slots. 4. Point of Discussion -Some people argues that why we have to give the historic slots while the airlines are not operating during cancellation period in case of less than 4 weeks cancellation. -Once you started describing the concrete example like in Annex 4, there should be numerous number of examples needs to be written.

Appendix 4 (Under Deliberation (2)) APPENDIX 4 DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR HISTORIC PRECEDENCE This appendix provides guidance on how cancellations made before 31Jan/31Aug are treated in determining the series of slots eligible for historic precedence and the target number of operations required to achieve 80% usage. Ideally coordinators should inform airlines of their eligibility for historic precedence after 31Jan/31Aug 5 or more week gaps 1.1 Original series 30 weeks at SHD 5 5 20 weeks gap > 4 ops SHL eligibility 5 20 weeks if same flight, 80% of 25 if different flights, 2 fragments 1.2 Original series 30 weeks at SHD 4 5 21 weeks gap > 4 ops SHL eligibility 21 weeks if operate at least 80% of 21 1.3 Original series 30 weeks at SHD 5 25 weeks gap > 4 ops SHL eligibility 5 25 weeks if operate at least 80% of 25

Appendix 4 (Under Deliberation (3)) less than 5 week gaps 2.1 Original series 30 weeks (6/30=20%) at SHD 4 3 4 3 16 gap <20% recognisably the same flight SHL eligibility 30 weeks if operate at least 80% of 24 2.2 Original series 30 weeks (7/30=23.3%) at SHD 4 3 5 4 14 gap >20% recognisably the same flight SHL eligibility 5 14 if same flight, 80% of 19 if different flights, 2 fragments 2.3 Original series 30 weeks (4/30=13.3%) at SHD 4 26 weeks gap <20% SHL eligibility 30 weeks if operate at least 80% of 26 2.4 Original series 18 weeks (4/18=22.2%) at SHD 4 14 weeks gap >20% SHL eligibility 14 weeks if operate at least 80% of 14