UNHCR Georgia 2010 Operation



Similar documents
NEPAL. Bhutan 56,710 56,710 43,920 43,920 29,290 29,290 Tibetans 15,000-15,000-15,000 - Various Bhutan 2,290-1,790-1,790 -

Refugee Protection and Mixed Migration: A 10-Point Plan of Action

COUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN

CONGO (REPUBLIC OF THE)

WORKING WITH LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER & INTERSEX PERSONS IN FORCED DISPLACEMENT

352 UNHCR Global Report 2010

Alternative report from UNICEF Sweden re. the UPR process re. Sweden

WORKING WITH PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN FORCED DISPLACEMENT

RECRUITMENT PROFILE. Profile: Community Services

Save the Children. Protecting Children in Zambia from Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation

INSTITUTIONAL AND ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE j) Mainstreaming a gender equality perspective in the Consolidated Inter-Agency Appeals BACKGROUND

Ouagadougou Action Plan to Combat Trafficking In Human Beings, Especially Women and Children

Refugees around the World and in Turkey

Employment creation in innovative public work programs: Phase III

UNHCR Policy on Return to Burundi List of Questions of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany

GREEK ACTION PLAN ON ASYLUM AND MIGRATION MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

LIST OF RELIEF ORGANIZATIONS

Unaccompanied minors in the EU European policy responses and research

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION ACTION PLAN ON SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN CONFLICT

DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL LEBANON. Accountability Framework

Country Operations Plan 2007 RWANDA

on the 27 FEBRUARY 2009

Centre International de Droit Comparé de l Environnement CIDCE. Comments on the Zero draft of the Post 2015 framework for disaster risk reduction

CITIES IN CRISIS CONSULTATIONS - Gaziantep, Turkey

Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Chile, Costa Rica, Georgia, Guatemala, Jordan, Nicaragua, Norway, Portugal and Qatar: draft resolution

Job Profile. Programme Coordinator

Terms of Reference. Food Security. Sector Coordination-Lebanon

UNHCR Working Paper A REVISED EU PRONG PROPOSAL

UN WOMEN MICRO-GRANT FACILITY PROPOSAL RELATED TO 16 DAYS OF ACTIVISM AGAINST GENDER- BASED VIOLENCE 2012

MAURITANIA. Working environment

ORGANISATIONAL ACTION PLAN

3,365,000 2,185, million

How To Achieve The Strategic Results Framework

Legal Focus. Taxation of International Organizations & their Partners. Taxation of the UN Agencies and their Contractors

Statement for the High Level Meeting on Disability and Development

Maritime Migration: IOM & Rescue at Sea November 2011 Djibouti

United Nations Study on Violence against Children. Response to the questionnaire received from the Government of the Republic of GUYANA

REPORT 2016/047 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of the operations in Egypt for the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

YOUTH AND MIGRATION HIGHLIGHTS

Sudan. Working environment. The context. The needs

Rwanda. Operational highlights. Working environment

5. The Model Strategies and Practical Measures are aimed at providing de jure and de

IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee

WHAT IS CCCM? CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT

The official nomination of national focal points for issues relating to statelessness in seven (7) States (commitment 22)

Child Protection in Crisis Uganda: March 2012 Learning Retreat

Policy on Mixed Migration. Adopted by the Council 2008 Revised may 2009 to include and refletc climate change concerns

Law of Georgia. on Refugee and Humanitarian Status

Law of Georgia on Combating Human Trafficking. (Adopted on 28 April 2006, entered into force in 16 June 2006) Chapter I. General Provisions

Zambia. Operational highlights. Working environment

Contents. Tables of Cases Table of Treaties and Other International and Regional Instruments Selected Abbreviations Online Resource Centre

National Model United Nations Week A March 17 March 21, 2013

THE CONCEPT of State Migration Policy

CALL for Action. Protecting of the rights of refugee and migrant children arriving in Europe

Emergency appeal operations update Cameroon: Population Movements

Terms of Reference: External Evaluation for Integrated Project focused on Gender Based Violence, Child Protection and Nutrition.

Reaching the Breaking Point An IRC briefing note on Syrian refugees in Lebanon

WHAT WOULD LIFE BE LIKE IF YOU HAD NO. nationality?

PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ERADICATION OF POVERTY. The Psychology Coalition at the United Nations, New York

NGO security coordination and other sources of support WITHIN FIRST 1-2 WEEKS. Office/compound/ facility security

Ministry of Women and Human Rights Development. Action Plan for the Implementation of the Human Rights Roadmap (HRRM) For Somalia

TAP Network Response to the Post-2015 Zero Draft

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

Terms of Reference for the Education Sector Working Group - Lebanon

OPINION ON GENDER DIMENSION IN THE NEXT PROGRAMMING PERIOD OF THE STRUCTURAL FUNDS

HUMANITARIAN. Food 11. Health 4 Shelter 4 Other 7 OECD/DAC

Gender Action for Peace and Security Strategy

ATLANTA DECLARATION AND PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION

Advisory Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men

Using National Action Plans on Women, Peace and Security to Get Your Government Moving

NFI Sector Working Group Working Paper on NFI Assistance Monitoring

UNICEF Violence Prevention and Response. Theresa Kilbane Senior Advisor, Child Protection 23 September 2015

Diversity of Cultural Expressions INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE DIVERSITY OF CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS

Security Risk Assessment Tool

GENDER EQUALITY AND WOMEN S RIGHTS. Council of Europe Standards

Erbil Declaration. Regional Women s Security Forum on Resolution UNSCR 1325

INTEGRATION IN DENMARK

Child Sexual Abuse, Exploitation and Trafficking in Bangladesh

Human mobility and displacement tracking

Georgia MINIMAL ADVANCEMENT

Transcription:

UNHCR Georgia 2010 Operation UNHCR Tbilisi, November 2009 New Budget Structure in UNHCR Four Pillars UNHCR recently adopted a revised budget structure, in line with UNHCR s results framework, which uses populations of concern as the planning principle. Effective as of 1 January 2010, the new structure comprises four distinct components: Pillar I - Refugees: UNHCR s refugee mandate, this covers protection, assistance and durable solutions activities in countries of asylum, together with capacity building, advocacy, and resource mobilization activities. Pillar II - Stateless: UNHCR s mandate for statelessness, this covers all UNHCR s programmes addressing stateless people, including populations with undetermined nationality. Pillar III - Reintegration: This is an area where UNHCR has joint responsibilities with other UN agencies within the context of Delivering as one and covers long-term activities to reintegrate returning refugees in their country of origin or to locally integrate refugees in their country of asylum. [not applicable to UNHCR Georgia s operation] Pillar IV - Internally Displaced People (IDPs): This covers all IDP operations where UNHCR increasingly operates within the inter-agency collaborative framework of the cluster approach. To the extent that UNHCR is called upon to become involved in the reintegration of IDPs in any given situation, these activities will be funded under the IDP pillar, not the reintegration pillar which is reserved for refugees. UNHCR Georgia operations in 2010 Comprehensive needs assesment In the first months of 2009, UNHCR Georgia conducted a comprehensive needs assessment to identify and cost the needs of people of concern to the Office in 2010. The assessment prioritized activities and involved consultations with the people of concern, relevant authorities, and agencies / NGOs operating in Georgia. With respect to IDP operations, UNHCR programming is closely linked to the UN-World Bank Georgia Needs Assessment and the Government IDP Action Plan to implement the State Strategy on IDPs. A total operational figure for 2010 of nearly 55 m USD was established and is broken down as follows: I. (Refugees) USD 4,000,800; II. (Stateless) USD 1,110,000; III. Not applicable for UNHCR Georgia operations; IV. (IDPs) USD 49,065,000 UNHCR Representation in Georgia 2a Kazbegi Ave 0160 Tbilisi Tel: +995 32 152 054 fax +995 32 385 422 e-mail: geotb@unhcr.org Refugees and IDPs are among the most vulnerable people on earth. Please get involved - visit www.unhcr.org

2010 Objective and Priorities (Rights Group) Overall objective The overall objective of UHCR Georgia s operation in 2010 remains the full integration of all categories of persons of concern as the only viable durable solution. However, priorities and objectives, together with activities aimed at achieving them, differ according to the different categories. Refugees (Pillar I) Background Durable Solutions There are around 1,000 refugees (primarily ethnic Kist and Chechen refugees from Chechnya, Russian Federation) and some 40 asylum seekers (mainly from Middle East countries) that are of concern to UNHCR Georgia. In 2010, UNHCR has three main priorities (Rights Groups) for these people of concern, namely durable solutions; a favourable protection environment; and security from violence and exploitation. Local integration in Georgia is the first and foremost option for finding a durable solution for refugees from Chechnya presently residing in Georgia. The potential for this option has been significantly strengthened by recent progress in the development of the asylum system in Georgia, in particular the introduction of temporary residence permits which provides refugees with proper, generally recognized documentation. Local integration requires collaborative efforts to address legal, economic, social and cultural dimensions of integration, with particular challenges being: the restricted access of refugees to national health, education and social care programmes; limited livelihoods in refugee and host communities; and poor awareness among refugees of civil obligations and rights. Naturalization, which concludes the legal dimension of an integration process, will be promoted, in particular for some 400 refugees who are stateless. The objective for UNHCR Georgia in 2010 is Potential for local integration realized. This will be through continued efforts to support local integration of refugees by offering (i) vocational / educational (including language) training; (ii) income generation projects; (iii) provision of integration grants allowing refugees to purchase houses; (iv) legal services to facilitate naturalization of refugees, including stateless refugees; and (v) enjoy access to the primary health care and other related activities. Favourable protection environment UNHCR Georgia intends to strengthen the capacity of the Ministry of Refugees and Accommodation (MRA) in the field of protection and assistance to refugees and asylum seekers through enhancement of the national legal asylum framework. UNHCR Georgia will continue providing support and technical assistance to MRA and the NGO community to ensure better implementation of international obligations of Georgia in the field of admission, reception and treatment of refugees and asylum seekers. In 2010 UNHCR Georgia has two objectives under this Rights Group, i.e. 1. National administrative framework affords better protection by strengthening the asylum related administrative framework through capacity building and technical / expert support to the MRA and other governmental structures in two main directions: (i) expansion and maintenance of reception facilities for asylum seekers, including support for the development of MRA management capacity (e.g. training activities) in the field of admission, reception and treatment of asylum seekers, and (ii) support to the national refugee status determination procedure through regular monitoring and provision of expertise, including country of origin information. UNHCR Georgia plans to ensure that regular and high-quality legal services are provided to individual asylum 2

seekers throughout the entire RSD procedure. 2. National legal framework developed or strengthened by implementing activities aimed at decreasing gaps in the present national asylum framework to bring it in line with international refugee law and standards. Activities will focus on (i) strengthening the capacity of the Government and national institutions, including civil society, in the field of protection and assistance of refugees and asylum seekers through targeted training activities of government, judiciary, border guards, NGOs and other key actors; (ii) lobbying for adoption of improved asylum legislation through meetings, workshops and seminars; and (iii) initiating relevant publications and media campaigns. Security from Violence and Exploitation The general security situation in the Pankisi valley has improved significantly over the past decade although feuds between families remain a security issue for refugees and host communities alike. Whilst there is no precise data on Gender Based Violence (GBV), profiling exercises, participatory assessments and NGO reports indicate wide-spread incidents. UNHCR Georgia will continue its involvement in preventing and responding to GBV cases to ensure the security of persons of concern from violence and exploitation. In 2010 UNHCR Georgia will concentre on the objective of Risk of GBV is reduced and quality of response improved through the provision of basic services to GBV survivors. Although an overall referral mechanism is already in place and implemented, within the framework of UNHCR Georgia s internal guidelines and regulations, the project needs to ensure the provision of efficient legal and physiological services to (potential) GBV victims. Stateless (Pillar II) Background Favourable Protection Environment Statelessness in Georgia, one of the consequences of the break up of the Soviet Union, is part of broader large scale migration and displacement issues. Although the Government of Georgia had registered more than 1,500 stateless people by December 2008, the actual number is thought to be considerably higher, especially among minority communities due to lack of birth certificates or other documentation problems. During the registration of newly displaced people in 2008, the Civil Registry Agency (CRA) counted up to 2,500 IDPs lacking identification documents. Georgia is not yet party to major conventions on statelessness, however ongoing efforts by UNHCR, such as comprehensive research projects and workshops, are beginning to bear fruit. The Government is beginning to acknowledge deficits in its national citizenship legislation and is seriously considering amendments and possible accession to relevant international instruments. In 2010 UNHCR plans to implement a number of activities directed to prevention and reduction of statelessness such as hiring an expert to draft recommendations to ameliorate citizenship legislation and bring it in compliance with the international and regional instruments; and raise awareness on the two UN Conventions through workshops, seminars, meetings and lobbying. In 2010 UNHCR Georgia aims to achieve the objective of: Prevention of statelessness is strengthened by strengthening the capacity of authorities to process citizenship applications throughout Georgia. Capacity building would be directed at the CRA and its 80 regional offices, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and its consular representations. This would include enhancement of the capacity of CRA offices to provide adequate assistance with problems of documentation and civil acts registration, including the establishment of fact of birth, issuing relevant documentation of identification as well as the registration and documentation of stateless cases. These capacity building measures may also include rehabilitation, refurnishing and technical upgrading of CRA branch offices in regions with a high concentration of persons of concern to UNHCR. A thorough study would be undertaken on the gaps and grey areas of the citizenship, civil 3

acts registration legislation, comparing theoretical substance of the legislation with practical implementation, and assessing the state of stateless, undocumented and unregistered persons. Fair Protection Processes and Documentation Birth certificates are the primary means of documenting citizenship of children, therefore closing the gaps in birth certification of minors deriving from the early years of Georgia s independence is the most effective means of preventing (de jure and de facto) statelessness. Earlier research and outreach efforts (initiated and co-funded by UNHCR and UNICEF) identified a growing number of undocumented minors in Georgia. UNHCR s comprehensive strategy includes awareness raising, identification of undocumented persons through mobile teams, assistance in applying for documentation and provision of legal aid to beneficiaries in six regions of Georgia where the highest number of undocumented persons have been identified. In 2010 UNHCR Georgia aims to achieve the objective of: Birth registration & certificates provided for children of concern by expanding awareness raising activities countrywide; identifying, documenting and providing legal aid to stateless people throughout Georgia; and undertaking training of local authorities (including police). IDPs (Pillar IV) Background UNHCR addresses the protection and assistance needs of nearly 340,000 persons of concern in Georgia, which around 220,000 IDPs living in areas of Georgia effectively controlled by the Government; some 10,000 displaced within South Ossetia1, and over 106,000 people who are continuing to live in IDP-like situations in Abkhazia, South Ossetia and areas adjacent to South Ossetia. Countrywide: Abkhazia: Western Georgia UNHCR Georgia s 2010 strategy for IDPs and returned IDPs has four main geographical components, each with its own main activities and priorities: a) Protection monitoring (especially in Shida Kartli) and GBV as well as political lobbying and advocacy for a more coherent IDP policy. There are three priorities in 2010: (i) under Favorable Protection Environment, capacity building, legal advice and documentation will work towards the objective of "National administrative framework affords better protection"; (ii) under Security from Violence and Exploitation, the objective of Risk of GBV is reduced and quality of response improved will be sought through the provision of basic services and efficient legal and physiological services to (potential) GBV survivors; (iii) under Community Participation and Self-Management, the objective of Community selfmanagement and equal representation strengthened and expanded will be handled through monitoring and involvement of the community b) Shelter plus and community participation / self-management activities will be based on two main priorities: (i) Durable Solutions with two objectives, namely Potential for local integration realized through protection monitoring and community services; and Potential for resettlement realized through self-reliance / livelihood activities; and (ii) Security from Violence and Exploitation with the same objectives and activities as indicated above. c) Priority will shift from shelter to community mobilization and income generation, with new shelter interventions being focused more on IDPs with special needs (e.g. social 1 Since humanitarian access has not been possible from Georgia since the armed conflict of August 2008, this figure is an estimate. 4

Shida Kartli housing for elderly), or those in isolated areas that might not be receiving Government assistance. In 2010, UNHCR Georgia has one main priority, namely Community Participation and Self-Management, with the objective of Level of self-reliance and livelihoods improved through small business support together with livelihoods / self-reliance activities. d) Re-integration of returned IDPs in the adjacent areas to South Ossetia with assistance such as shelter kits and income generation will be the focus of UNHCR Georgia s work in this region with two main priorities: (i) Community Participation and Self- Management, with the same objective and activities as indicated above for IDPS in western Georgia; and (ii) establishing a Favourable Protection Environment through protection monitoring, assessment of protection needs of IDPs and people in IDP like situation, coordination and referral to achieve the objective of National administrative framework affords better protection. Results that cannot be achieved without full funding of the Comprehensive Plan No capacity building, expert or technical assistance to guide government officials about international principles pertaining to IDP protection; No training sessions of border guards, NGOs and relevant actors which might result in instances of risk of refoulement taking place unreported, decreasing UNHCR s ability to intervene on behalf of asylum seekers and refugees; Possible increase in unregistered births, inconsistent national legal regulations and consequent increase in statelessness; Reduced advocacy for refugees to be included in development plans of government, international institutions, bi-lateral and multi-lateral donors. 80% of children may not have their birth registered nor documentation provided; 135 women / girls at risk might not have access to safe havens and 220 GBV survivors might not receive needed counseling; 40 children with specific needs will have to wait new funding before receiving support and assistance; Refugee and IDP women may have little recourse when subjected to domestic violence, forced early marriage, bride-kidnapping and abandonment and GBV incidents may increase; The majority of refugees have no right to free of charge first aid and health care facilities are inadequate, and lack of funding will hinder UNHCR advocating for access to the national health system and the introduction of health insurance for refugees, whilst providing assistance pending a solution; UNHCR will unable to intervene in areas where there are known major gaps such as IDPs with specific needs, including the elderly and disabled who require tailored solutions; Reduction in number of income-generating projects offered may discourage refugees who have only recently realized the importance of becoming self-reliant (which is a requisite for eventual naturalization); Profile exercises and participatory assessments will not be feasible which may limit involvement of IDPs in project development and could result in programmes being launched that are not 100% tailored to their specific needs and expectations; Increasing representation of women in leadership / management structures to 5

50% will be delayed; Community structures will not be in place or will not be sustained to mobilize IDPs to identify their needs and address them with the help of the Government and international society. Insufficient number of model projects to adequately improve the implementation of the IDP Action Plan towards more sustainable resettlement of IDPs by complementing shelter provision with livelihoods and self-reliance support. IDPs with specific needs, including the elderly, unaccompanied children and victims of GBV, will have limited and unsustainable access to shelter assistance and durable solutions as the current one-for-all solutions do not fit their needs; Delays in finding local reintegration solutions, such as adequate housing and self-reliance projects, would slow down naturalization prospects for refugees and possibly create unwanted tension between those assisted immediately and those who will have to wait further funding. PHOTO: New IDP Housing Settlement, Shida Kartli; UNHCR/L. Foster 6