Impact of Permanency Roundtables in Georgia

Similar documents
Ohio Child and Family Services Review Statewide Assessment

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Department of Human Services Division of Family and Children s Services

R A N K I N G Which State Child Welfare Systems Are Right for Kids?

Aging Information Management System (AIMS)

How Does the Child Welfare System Work?

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT

Attachment F. Child Welfare System Improvement Plan (SIP) Summaries

California Child Welfare Services Outcome & Accountability County Data Report (Welfare Supervised Caseload) Sutter County January 2004

Continuous Quality Improvement Project

GEORGIA DIVISION OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES CHILD WELFARE POLICY MANUAL

Credit Report Training

Our Mission To ensure the success of children in jeopardy by empowering families. Our Vision A community where all children and families flourish

Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act of 2014

Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption

System Improvement Plan

AFCARS ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT PLAN: Foster Care Elements State: Florida

GEORGIA DIVISION OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES CHILD WELFARE POLICY MANUAL

Foster Care Adoption in the United States:

Executive Summary Florida Child Abuse Prevention and Permanency Plan: July 2010 June 2015 Developed pursuant to , Florida Statutes.

Foster Care in Germany

What happens when your child is removed from your home

CRS Report for Congress

Legal Safeguards for Children In New Mexico

A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING THE EMANCIPATION OF A MINOR

ALIGNING PROJECTS WITH STRATEGIC DIRECTION

When Your Child is Removed from Your Care

HUMAN SERVICES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

CHANCELLOR'S COMMUNICATION

Welcome to TRiO/Student Support Services

Sacramento County Child Protective Services

STATE AGENCY VOCATIONAL SERVICES FOR PEOPLE WITH MENTAL HEALTH DISABILITIES IN MASSACHUSETTS

Quality Management Plan

California s Linkages: A service partnership between Child Welfare and CalWORKs

TOPIC PURPOSE CONTACT SIGNED. CHARLES JOHNSON Deputy Commissioner TERMINOLOGY NOTICE

Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act Report of the Governor s Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect Citizen Review Panel June 2008

Highlights from State Reports to the National Youth in Transition Database, Federal Fiscal Year 2011

Title IV-E: It s Not Just About Money or Why It Matters to Children in Foster Care. Ann Ahlstrom Staff Attorney and Manager of CJI

2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS AND SERVICES REPORT. Office of Families and Children

ASSESSMENT RECORD FOR DEPARTMENT OF. Organizational Leadership

AT GREATER RISK. California Foster Youth and the Path from High School to College

California Independent Living Program Transformation Breakthrough Series Collaborative

Idaho Division of Vocational Rehabilitation

New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services. Division for Children, Youth and Families Child and Family Services Plan

Assembly Bill 12 Primer

Nursing Strategic Plan. Fiscal Year Shaping the Future of UCLA Nursing at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

Juvenile Justice Centres Continuous Improvement Quality Assurance Framework Policy

Figure 24 Georgia s Children a Major Focus of Human Services. $20 M Georgia Vocational Rehab Agency $1.5 M Office of Residential Child Care

Ontario Hospital Association Strategic Plan: A Catalyst for Change

1 Responsibilities associated with parenting;

How Many Children Were Adopted in 2007 and 2008?

Nomination for NASPE Eugene H. Rooney Jr. Award Innovative State Human Resource Management Program

Who is Placed in the Supervised Independent Living Placement (SILP)?

Idaho Division of Vocational Rehabilitation

Strategic Plan FY FY July 10, 2014

Iowa Department of Human Services

Information Packet. Expanding Health Insurance for Youth Aging Out of Foster. Care. By Natalie Mendes

Child and Family Services Agency

2009 Nursing Strategic Plan. Atrium Medical Center

SEARCH PROFILE. Executive Director Policy, Planning and Legislative Services. Alberta Seniors and Housing. Executive Manager I

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA ON CITIZENSHIP OF GEORGIA

Maltreatment Prevention Programs and Policies in New Jersey

SECTION III: CHILDREN, YOUTH AND THEIR FAMILIES INTRODUCTION

Catherine Meister, Chairman. Susan Brewster. Frank Browning. Betty Hornbrook. Elaine Marable. Melinda O Connor. Kelly Potter.

ADOPTION & FAMILY INFORMATION SERVICE. Level 1 45 Wakefield Street Adelaide 5000 South Australia. GPO Box 292 Adelaide 5001 South Australia

Technical Bulletin #2. National Youth in Transition Database (NYTD) Compliance Standards

Miami County. County Commissioners: Jack Evans John O Brien Ron Widener. County Department of Job and Family Services Child Support Enforcement Agency

Ottawa County. County Commissioners: Steve Arndt James Sass Mark Stahl

Centrally managed application for in year admission to school during 2013/14 (IYA-SCCCMA)

Advancing Professional Excellence Guide Table of Contents

LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL PERMANENCE POLICY 2013

VISION, GOALS and OBJECTIVES

Transcription:

Georgia Department of Human Services Impact of Permanency Roundtables in Georgia Presenter: Sharon L. Hill, Ph.D. Georgia DFCS Director, Federal Regulations & Data slhill1@dhr.state.ga.us Presentation to: Statewide Master Practitioners Meeting Date: January 25, 2012

Vision Vision, Mission and Core Values Stronger Families for a Stronger Georgia. Mission Strengthen Georgia by providing Individuals and Families access to services that promote self-sufficiency, independence, and protect Georgia's vulnerable children and adults. Core Values Core Values Provide access to resources that offer support and empower Georgians and their families. Deliver services professionally and treat all clients with dignity and respect. Manage business operations effectively and efficiently by aligning resources across the agency. Promote accountability, transparency and quality in all services we deliver and programs we administer. Develop our employees at all levels of the agency.

Summary of Information The information contained in this presentation provides data regarding 3,706 children/youth who had been in foster care for 18 months or more at the time of the Permanency Round Table. All children in this category are not included because of missing or incomplete information in SHINES. Seventy-nine% of the children have already exited care; of those who have exited care, 68.9% of them were discharged to positive permanency (adoption, reunification, live with relatives and/or guardianship). More children left foster care for adoption than any other category; this has had a positive impact on Georgia s overall performance on Timeliness of Adoption and Children in Care for Long Periods of Time (CFSR Composites). Time in care from removal to discharge statewide has been consistently decreasing over the past three years.

Current Status of Children who were in care 18 months or more at the time of their Permanency Round Table (3,706) Note: Graph based on the 3,706 children with complete information in SHINES.

Current Status of Children who were Round-Tabled by Region Total Children in List % Non Permanency % Still In % Region Custody Positive Permanency 1 189 23.3% 45.5% 31.2% 2 170 16.5% 58.8% 24.7% 3 194 25.3% 45.9% 28.9% 4 306 16.7% 54.9% 28.4% 5 118 40.7% 38.1% 21.2% 6 64 34.4% 35.9% 29.7% 7 34 5.9% 50.0% 44.1% 8 109 21.1% 36.7% 42.2% 9 64 17.2% 40.6% 42.2% 10 161 17.4% 65.2% 17.4% 11 277 26.0% 48.4% 25.6% 12 70 15.7% 34.3% 50.0% 13 315 18.4% 58.1% 23.5% 14 532 18.4% 60.7% 20.9% 15 225 25.3% 48.9% 25.8% 16 159 19.5% 49.7% 30.8% 17 719 21.0% 64.1% 14.9% State 3,706 21.2% 54.3% 24.5% Note: This includes only children who were in care 18+ months at the time of their roundtables. Table reflects the regional designations prior to December 1, 2011.

Graph reflects the outcomes of the 2,922 children who were in care for 18+ months at the time of their roundtables and are no longer in care; 2,013 or 68.9% were discharged to positive permanency and 909 or 31.1% were discharged to nonpositive permanency. Permanency Outcomes of Children who were Round-Tabled & Are No Longer in Care (N=2,922) Positive Permanency Outcomes: -Adoption (41.1%) -Reunification (30.2%) -Relative (16.1%) -Guardianship (12.6%) Non-Positive Permanency Outcomes: Emancipation (94.3%) Transferred to Another Agency (5.4%) Other (<1%)

Time in Care from Removal to Discharge (Statewide Trend) Median Months in Care Average Months in Care Positive Permanency (Average Months in Care) Non Positive Permanency (Average Months in Care) FFY09 13.6 20.6 17.9 41.8 FFY10 11.9 19.3 16.7 39.5 FFY11 11.0 17.2 14.8 34.0

Permanency Composite 2: Timeliness of Adoption FFY 2008 FFY 2009 FFY 2010 *FFY 2011 (AS OF 3/2011) Standard for Permanency Composite 2 = 106.4 or higher 103.2 104.0 119.0 125.1 Component A: Timeliness of Adoptions of Children Discharged from Foster Care (composed of two measures) Measure C2-1: Exits to adoption in less than 24 months: Of all children who were discharged from foster care to a finalized adoption in the year shown, what percent was discharged in less than 24 months from the date of the latest removal from home? [national median = 26.8%, 75 th Percentile = 36.6%] Measure C2-2: Exits to adoption, median length of stay: Of all children who were discharged from foster care (FC) to a finalized adoption in the year shown, what was the median length of stay in FC (in months) from the date of latest removal from home to the date of discharge to adoption? [national median = 32.4 months, 25 th Percentile = 27.3 months(lower score is preferable in this measure)] Component B: Progress Toward Adoption for Children in Foster Care for 17 Months or Longer. There are two individual measures. See below. 24.1% 26.6% 28.6% 32.9% Median = 32.4 months Median = 32.1 months Median = 33.1 months Median = 30.8 months Measure C2-3: Children in care 17+ months, adopted by the end of the year: Of all children in foster care (FC) on the first day of the year shown who were in FC for 17 continuous months or longer (and who, by the last day of the year shown, were not discharged from FC with a discharge reason of live with relative, reunify, or guardianship), what percent was discharged from FC to a finalized adoption by the last day of the year shown? [national median = 20.2%, 75 th Percentile = 22.7%] Measure C2-4: Children in care 17+ months achieving legal freedom within 6 months: Of all children in foster care (FC) on the first day of the year shown who were in FC for 17 continuous months or longer, and were not legally free for adoption prior to that day, what percent became legally free for adoption during the first 6 months of the year shown? Legally free means that there was a parental rights termination date reported to AFCARS for both mother and father. This calculation excludes children who, by the end of the first 6 months of the year shown had discharged from FC to "reunification," "live with relative," or "guardianship." [national median = 8.8%, 75 th Percentile = 10.9%] 23.2% 27.4% 30.5% 30.3% 12.5% 8.1% 9.6% 11.1%

Permanency Composite 3: Permanency for Children and Youth in Foster Care for Long Periods of Time FFY 2008 FFY 2009 FFY 2010 *FFY 2011 (AS OF 3/2011) Standard for Permanency Composite 3 = 121.7 or higher 123.3 123.6 129.6 130.2 Component A: Achieving permanency for Children in Foster Care for Long Periods of Time. This component has two measures. Measure C3-1: Exits to permanency prior to 18th birthday for children in care for 24 + months. Of all children in foster care for 24 months or longer on the first day of the year shown, what percent was discharged to a permanent home prior to their 18th birthday and by the end of the fiscal year? A permanent home is defined as having a discharge reason of adoption, guardianship, or reunification (including living with relative). [national median 25.0%, 75 th Percentile = 29.1%] Measure C3-2: Exits to permanency for children with TPR: Of all children who were discharged from foster care in the year shown, and who were legally free for adoption at the time of discharge (i.e., there was a parental rights termination date reported to AFCARS for both mother and father), what percent was discharged to a permanent home prior to their 18th birthday? A permanent home is defined as having a discharge reason of adoption, guardianship, or reunification (including living with relative) [national median 96.8%, 75 th Percentile = 98.0%] Component B: Growing up in foster care. This component has one measure. Measure C3-3: Children Emancipated Who Were in Foster Care for 3 Years or More. Of all children who, during the year shown, either (1) were discharged from foster care prior to age 18 with a discharge reason of emancipation, or (2) reached their 18 th birthday while in foster care, what percent were in foster care for 3 years or longer? [national median 47.8%, 25 th Percentile = 37.5% (lower score is preferable)] 35.1% 37.7% 38.8% 37.4% 91.5% 92.5% 92.6% 94.2% 47.3% 48.8% 47.3% 46.6%