Impacts of Sequestration on the States



Similar documents
Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)

American C.E. Requirements

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

Licensure Resources by State

Net-Temps Job Distribution Network

State-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements

State Tax Information

State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011

Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year

NAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State

STATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS

State Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11

State Tax Information

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

State by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement

Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service

In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1

Current State Regulations

Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List

Attachment A. Program approval is aligned to NCATE and is outcomes/performance based

We do require the name and mailing address of each person forming the LLC.

What to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules. John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Bradley University, Peoria, IL

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1

STATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF

********************

2014 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

Question for the filing office of Texas, Re: the Texas LLC act. Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger. William Mitchell College of Law, Minnesota

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor

NOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY [STATE] LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION

LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010

Census Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009

$7.5 appropriation $ Preschool Development Grants

Overview of School Choice Policies

The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers

States Ranked by Alcohol Tax Rates: Beer (as of March 2009) Ranking State Beer Tax (per gallon)

Use of "Mail Box" service. Date: April 6, [Use of Mail Box Service] [April 6, 2015]

IRS Request for Assistance re New EIN and True Owner. Question by: Sarah Steinbeck on behalf of Leslie Reynolds. Date: 5 August 2010

Please contact if you have any questions regarding this survey.

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit

Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Date: July 29, [Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C)] [July 29, 2013]

State Individual Income Taxes: Treatment of Select Itemized Deductions, 2006

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011

14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. or branches outside of its home state primarily for the purpose of deposit production.

Question by: Karon Beyer. Date: March 28, [LLC Question] [ ]

List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds

I have been asked to pose the following questions to the list serve regarding disaster recovery plans

GOVERNMENT-FINANCED EMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE 50 STATES

COMPARE NEBRASKA S BUSINESS CLIMATE TO OTHER STATES. Selected Business Costs for Each State. Workers Compensation Rates

Sample/Excerpts ONLY Not Full Report

Q Homeowner Confidence Survey. May 14, 2009

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014

THE 2013 HPS SALARY SURVEY

ADDENDUM TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE SUMMARY ENROLLMENT REPORT FOR THE INITIAL ANNUAL OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD

PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY COMPENSATION

THE 2012 HPS SALARY SURVEY

Acceptable Certificates from States other than New York

(In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES FECA LHWCA

FELONY DUI SYNOPSIS. 46 states have felony DUI. Charts 1 and 2 detail the felony threshold for each of the 46 states analyzed.

LLC Member/Manager Disclosure Question by: Cathy Beaudoin. Jurisdiction. Date: 01 March LLC Member/Manager Disclosure 2011 March 01

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide

EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2011

Education Program Beneficiaries

Compulsory Auto Insurance and Financial Responsibility Laws State Reporting Programs

State Corporate Income Tax Rates As of December 31, 2006 (2006's noteworthy changes in bold italics)

Prepared by : Michael R. Fowlkes CBP / Fraudulent Document Officer San Ysidro Port of Entry 720 E. San Ysidro Blvd. San Ysidro, CA (619)

STATE MOTORCYCLE LEMON LAW SUMMARIES

State Tax of Social Security Income. State Tax of Pension Income. State

2015 National Utilization and Compensation Survey Report. Section 3 Billing Rates. Based on Data Collected: 4 th Quarter 2014

A-79. Appendix A Overview and Detailed Tables

County - $0.55/$500 - $.75/$500 depending on +/- 2 million population 0.11% % Minnesota

US Department of Health and Human Services Exclusion Program. Thomas Sowinski Special Agent in Charge/ Reviewing Official

Consent to Appointment as Registered Agent

State Corporate Income Tax Rates As of July 1, 2009

Verizon Wireless Ranks Highest in Wireless Network Quality Performance in Five Regions; AT&T Ranks Highest in One Region

Prompt Payment Laws by State & Sample Appeal Letter

LLC Domestications. Date: March 23, [LLC Domestication] [March 23, 2015]

Zurich Term Death Benefit Protection With Options

Liquor Wine Beer Other taxes

Supreme Court Strikes Down DOMA, Clears Way for Same-Sex Marriage in California

NCSL Capitol Security Survey ( )

STATISTICAL BRIEF #435

Model Regulation Service January 2006 DISCLOSURE FOR SMALL FACE AMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES MODEL ACT

Alabama Kentucky North Dakota Alaska Kentucky Ohio Arkansas Louisiana Oklahoma

July 2012 (1) States With Negative Growth 22 States With Positive Growth 25

Transcription:

Impacts of Sequestration on the States Alabama Alabama will lose about $230,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Alabama could lose up to $102,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 400 fewer victims Alaska Alaska will lose about $69,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: Alaska could lose up to $13,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Arizona Arizona will lose about $298,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Arizona could lose up to $132,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims Arkansas Arkansas will lose about $159,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law

STOP Violence Against Women Program: Arkansas could lose up to $62,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 200 fewer victims California California will lose about $1.6 million in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: California could lose up to $795,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 3,000 fewer victims Colorado Colorado will lose about $213,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Colorado could lose up to $109,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 400 fewer victims Connecticut Connecticut will lose about $153,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Connecticut could lose up to $76,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 300 fewer victims Delaware Delaware will lose about $83,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law

STOP Violence Against Women Program: Delaware could lose up to $19,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims District of Columbia The District of Columbia will lose about $80,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, prosecution and courts, crime prevention and education, corrections and community corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: The District of Columbia could lose up to $13,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Florida Florida will lose about $970,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Florida could lose up to $404,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 1,500 fewer victims Georgia Georgia will lose about $427,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Georgia could lose up to $208,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 800 fewer victims Hawaii Hawaii will lose about $79,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law

Idaho STOP Violence Against Women Program: Hawaii could lose up to $29,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Idaho will lose about $82,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: Idaho could lose up to $33,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Illinois Illinois will lose about $587,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: Illinois could lose up to $273,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 1,000 fewer victims Indiana Iowa Indiana will lose about $262,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Indiana could lose up to $138,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims Iowa will lose about $135,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement,

corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: Iowa could lose up to $65,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 200 fewer victims Kansas Kansas will lose about $149,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Kansas could lose up to $61,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 200 fewer victims Kentucky Kentucky will lose about $171,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Kentucky could lose up to $93,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 400 fewer victims Louisiana Louisiana will lose about $264,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Louisiana could lose up to $97,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 400 fewer victims Maine Maine will lose about $67,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement,

corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: Maine could lose up to $28,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Maryland Maryland will lose about $317,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Maryland could lose up to $124,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims Massachusetts Massachusetts will lose about $300,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Massachusetts could lose up to $140,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims Michigan Michigan will lose about $482,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Michigan could lose up to $209,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 800 fewer victims Minnesota Minnesota will lose about $201,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law

STOP Violence Against Women Program: Minnesota could lose up to $113,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 400 fewer victims Mississippi Mississippi will lose about $138,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Mississippi could lose up to $63,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 200 fewer victims being served Missouri Missouri will lose about $298,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Missouri could lose up to $127,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims Montana Montana will lose about $66,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Montana could lose up to $20,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Nebraska Nebraska will lose about $97,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law

STOP Violence Against Women Program: Nebraska could lose up to $39,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Nevada Nevada will lose about $181,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Nevada could lose up to $57,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 200 fewer victims being served New Hampshire New Hampshire will lose about $71,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: New Hampshire could lose up to $28,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims New Jersey New Jersey will lose about $336,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: New Jersey could lose up to $187,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 700 fewer victims New Mexico New Mexico will lose about $135,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law

STOP Violence Against Women Program: New Mexico could lose up to $40,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 200 fewer victims New York New York will lose about $780,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: New York could lose up to $412,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 1,600 fewer victims North Carolina North Carolina will lose about $401,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: North Carolina could lose up to $205,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 800 fewer victims North Dakota Ohio Law Enforcement and Public Safety Funds for Crime Prevention and Prosecution North Dakota will lose about $35,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: North Dakota could lose up to $14,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Law Enforcement and Public Safety Funds for Crime Prevention and Prosecution: Ohio will lose about $455,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: Ohio could lose up to $245,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 900 fewer victims

Oklahoma Oklahoma will lose about $193,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Oklahoma could lose up to $74,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 300 fewer victims Oregon Oregon will lose about $155,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Oregon could lose up to $81,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 300 fewer victims Pennsylvania Pennsylvania will lose about $509,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Pennsylvania could lose up to $271,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 1,000 fewer victims Rhode Island Rhode Island will lose about $68,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: Rhode Island could lose up to $22,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims

South Carolina South Carolina will lose about $278,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: South Carolina could lose up to $99,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 400 fewer victims South Dakota South Dakota will lose about $37,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: South Dakota could lose up to $16,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Tennessee Texas Tennessee will lose about $367,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Tennessee could lose up to $136,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims Texas will lose about $1,103,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: Texas could lose up to $543,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 2,100 fewer victims

Utah Utah will lose about $119,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness STOP Violence Against Women Program: Utah could lose up to $59,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 200 fewer victims Vermont : Vermont will lose about $33,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Vermont could lose up to $13,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims Virginia Virginia will lose about $276,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Virginia could lose up to $172,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 700 fewer victims Washington Washington will lose about $271,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Washington could lose up to $143,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims

West Virginia West Virginia will lose about $96,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: West Virginia could lose up to $39,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 200 fewer victims Wisconsin Wisconsin will lose about $216,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Wisconsin could lose up to $120,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims Wyoming Wyoming will lose about $36,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Wyoming could lose up to $12,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 100 fewer victims