CMMI Version 1.2. SCAMPI SM A Appraisal Method Changes



Similar documents
The Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1

Manage the acquisition of products from suppliers for which there exists a formal agreement.

CMS Policy for Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI ) Version 1.2 Overview

SW Process Improvement and CMMI. Dr. Kanchit Malaivongs Authorized SCAMPI Lead Appraisor Authorized CMMI Instructor

CMMI Practitioners: How Can We Improve the Skill-set?

Risk Repository. Prepare for Risk Management (SG 1) Mitigate Risks (SG 3) Identify and Analyze Risks (SG 2)

Distributed and Outsourced Software Engineering. The CMMI Model. Peter Kolb. Software Engineering

Data Management Maturity (DMM) Model Update

Process In Execution Review (PIER) and the SCAMPI B Method

How To Understand And Understand The Cmm

Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI ) Overview

Software Engineering CSCI Class 50 Software Process Improvement. December 1, 2014

Steve Masters (SEI) SEPG North America March Carnegie Mellon University

Engineering Standards in Support of

Overview of the Systems Security Engineering Capability Maturity Model (SSE-CMM)

Foredragfor Den Norske Dataforening, den

Introduction to the CMMI Acquisition Module (CMMI-AM)

Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI SM ) Fundamentals

CMMI for SCAMPI SM Class A Appraisal Results 2011 End-Year Update

CMMI for Development Introduction & Implementation Roadmap

Software Quality. Process Quality " Martin Glinz. Chapter 5. Department of Informatics!

CMMI: What do we need to do in Requirements Management & Engineering?

A Report on The Capability Maturity Model

A Taxonomy of Operational Risks

CMMI for Development, Version 1.3

CMMI for Development, Version 1.3

CMM -Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI) Version 1.2 Method Description

Capability Maturity Model Integratoin (CMMI) and its Assessment Process

Introduction to SEIs Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

The Advantages of ISO 9001 Certification

Software Process Improvement CMM

Leveraging CMMI framework for Engineering Services

Project Management. 06 Requirements Management. IT M a t u r i t y. S e r v i c e s

SEI Level 2, 3, 4, & 5 1 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

Data Management Maturity Model. Overview

CMMI for Acquisition, Version 1.3

Concept of Operations for the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI SM )

A Lightweight Supplier Evaluation based on CMMI

CMMI 100 Success Secrets

CMMI-Services Visao Geral & CMMI v1.3 Plans

Evaluation Reminders. For Team Chairs Evaluators, Financial Reviewers, And Generalists Institutions being Reviewed

What do you think? Definitions of Quality

Lessons Learned from Adopting CMMI for Small Organizations

Match point: Who will win the game, ITIL or CMMI-SVC? NA SEPG 2011 Paper Presentation

Case Study of CMMI implementation at Bank of Montreal (BMO) Financial Group

Continuous Risk Management Guidebook

Interpreting Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI ) for Service Organizations a Systems Engineering and Integration Services Example

Developing CMMI in IT Projects with Considering other Development Models

Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

Using Rational Software Solutions to Achieve CMMI Level 2

LUXOFT ADVANTAGES. International Quality Standards

CMMI Level 5 and the Team Software Process. Dr. Gene Miluk Software Engineering Institute

Capability Maturity Model Integrated (CMMI)

[project.headway] Integrating Project HEADWAY And CMMI

Using Baldrige Performance Criteria to Strengthen CMMI Measurable Results NDIA CMMI Conference - November 2008

International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research (IASIR) (An Association Unifying the Sciences, Engineering, and Applied Research)

CMMI KEY PROCESS AREAS

Synergism of the CMMI Development and Services Constellations in a Hybrid Organization

Maturity Model. March Version 1.0. P2MM Version 1.0 The OGC logo is a Registered Trade Mark of the Office of Government Commerce

Software Quality Assurance: VI Standards

LESS is, in fact, MORE! 60% Paper Reduction Using an Enterprise-Wide Process Framework

Software Process Improvement

Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation SM (OCTAVE SM ) Framework, Version 1.0

SOFTWARE QUALITY & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROGRAM. Quality Assurance Checklist

NDIA CMMI Technology Conference and User Group NASA Experience with CMM and CMMI

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Software Engineering Standards

Software Acquisition Capability Maturity Model (SA-CMM ) Version 1.03

Maturity Assesment for Processes in IT

Basic Principles and Concepts for Achieving Quality

CMM SM -Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI): Method Description

Making Sense of Process Improvement Programs and Appraisals

Future of CMM and Quality Improvement. Roy Ko Hong Kong Productivity Council

Rapidly Defining a Lean CMMI Maturity Level 3 Process

Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI ) Overview

The Software Engineering. Today and in the Future. Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Program Lifecycle Methodology Version 1.7

Coming up soon: TMMI. What to expect. Jan Jaap Cannegieter Vice President SYSQA

Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model (ES-C2M2) (Case Study) James Stevens Senior Member, Technical Staff - CERT Division

Transcription:

Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 CMMI Version 1.2 SCAMPI SM A Appraisal Method Changes SM CMM Integration, IDEAL, and SCAMPI are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University. Capability Maturity Model, Capability Maturity Modeling, CMM, and CMMI are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon University. Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University This material is approved for public release. CMMI v1.2 : SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 1

Purpose The purpose of this module is to describe the major changes to the SCAMPI A appraisal method for v1.2. 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 2

Revision Process The CMMI Steering Group provided a long-term strategy and the upgrade criteria for v1.2. The SCAMPI Upgrade Team (SUT) reviewed change requests to identify possible changes for the v1.2 appraisal method documents: Appraisal Requirements for CMMI (ARC) and Method Definition Document (MDD). The CMMI Steering Group served as the configuration control board for v1.2 changes to the ARC and MDD. The SUT developed a draft of the ARC and MDD for review by lead appraisers in May 2006. The ARC and MDD were released as part of the v1.2 CMMI Product Suite. 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 3

SCAMPI A V1.2 Major Themes Reduce complexity and ambiguity Provide additional guidance where needed Strengthen appraisal planning and conduct Strengthen appraisal reporting Define appraisal validity period Strengthen lead appraiser requirements 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 4

Reduce Complexity 1 The requirement for instruments (e.g., questionnaires) was removed. Only two types of objective evidence are now required: documents interviews The following sections in MDD were revised: switched 2.2 Verify and Validate Objective Evidence and 2.3 Document Objective Evidence so that the order of tasks reflects the natural order of conducting an appraisal separated Verify Objective Evidence and Validate Preliminary Findings to better describe each process 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 5

Reduce Complexity 2 The use of the term instantiation was changed: Instantiation is now defined as the implementation of a model practice used in the appropriate context within the boundaries of an organizational unit. The word instantiation for project and organizationalwide entities was replaced with project or support group. 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 6

Reduce Ambiguity The rating Not Rated was clarified: Process areas outside of the model scope are rated as Out of Scope. For example, for a maturity level 3 appraisal, maturity level 4 and 5 process areas are rated as Out of Scope. For process areas that have insufficient data to be rated, the rating is Not Rated. Process areas in the model scope, but outside the organizational scope are rated as Not Applicable. The only process area that can be Not Applicable is SAM (as determined by the appraisal team). The practice characterization tables were revised: clarified the use of virtual versus live interviews changed face-to-face interviews to oral interviews 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 7

Provide Additional Guidance Guidance for readiness reviews was revised to include team and logistical readiness. Additional guidance was provided for using virtual methods (e.g., for interviews and briefings). Additional guidance was provided for using alternative practices (i.e., Appendix C: Alternative Practice Identification and Characterization Guidance). 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 8

Strengthen Appraisal Planning and Conduct Organizational unit sampling was revised to* strengthen parameters and limits for organizational sampling (e.g., identifying a minimum number of focus projects) include additional criteria for reporting sampling decisions The Conduct Appraisal Phase must now be complete within 90 days. Appraisal team members are now required to sign final findings. *Changes to address sampling were extensive. Refer to the MDD for details. 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 9

Strengthen Appraisal Reporting The Appraisal Disclosure Statement (ADS) now requires the following information. Organizational sampling criteria and decisions (e.g., projects included, projects excluded, percentage of organization represented) Basis for maturity/capability level 4 and 5 appraisal results subprocesses statistically managed mapping of these subprocesses to quality and processperformance objectives Signatures of both the lead appraiser and sponsor The lead appraiser affirms that the appraisal scope is representative of the organizational unit. The sponsor affirms the accuracy of the ADS and authorizes the SEI to conduct any audits deemed necessary. 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 10

Define Appraisal Validity Period V1.2 appraisal results are valid for a maximum of 3 years from the date of the ADS. V1.1 appraisals will expire on August 31, 2007 or 3 years after the date the appraisal was conducted, whichever is later. 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 11

Strengthen Lead Appraiser Requirements Prior to conducting a v1.2 SCAMPI appraisal, the following must occur: Current candidate and authorized lead appraisers and team leaders must complete CMMI v1.2 Upgrade Training. Candidate and authorized lead appraisers must attend SCAMPI Face-to-Face Training. Those who want to conduct v1.2 SCAMPI level 4 or 5 appraisals must be certified. Certification requirements address the following: - education, training, and experience in level 4 and 5 concepts - completion of an oral exam 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 12

Summary The SCAMPI A appraisal method was revised based on change requests received to reduce complexity and ambiguity provide additional guidance where needed strengthen appraisal planning and conduct strengthen appraisal reporting define the appraisal validity period strengthen lead appraiser requirements The changes are intended to make appraisals more accurate, reliable, and efficient. 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University CMMI v1.2: SCAMPI A Appraisal Method Changes - 081706 - Page 13