American National Standards. value of the ANS designation



Similar documents
ANSI: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW

ANSI Healthcare Informatics Board (HISB)

ANSI Essential Requirements: Due process requirements for American National Standards Edition: January 2015

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 2015

IAF Informative Document. IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Management System Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17021:2011 from ISO/IEC 17021:2006

IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Food Safety Management System Accreditation to ISO/TS 22003:2013 from ISO/TS 22003:2007

Private Certification to Inform Regulatory Risk-Based Oversight: Discussion Document

Re: Docket No. FDA 2014 N 0339: Proposed Risk-Based Regulatory Framework and Strategy for Health Information Technology Report; Request for Comments

Enterprise Risk Management: COSO, New COSO, ISO Review of ERM

Foreword Introduction - The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) Scope Section Overview Normative References...

Certification for Information System Security Professional (CISSP)

IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Food Safety Management System Accreditation to ISO/TS 22003:201X from ISO/TS 22003:2007

Application of King III Corporate Governance Principles

ROLE OF THE APEC SPECIALIST REGIONAL BODIES

Application of King III Corporate Governance Principles

ASAE s Job Task Analysis Strategic Level Competencies

CSA Z1600 Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs

A Guide for National Standard Setters that Adopt IAASB s International Standards but Find It Necessary to Make Limited Modifications

Accreditation in Europe

An Overview of the ANSI/ASA Standards Program

International Accreditation Forum, Inc.

IAF Mandatory Document

Contact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué Issy-les-Moulineaux

Competency Requirements for Executive Director Candidates

Application of ISO/IEC for the Accreditation of Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS) Certification Bodies

EPEAT Program Guidelines

An Alternative Method for Maintaining ISO 9001/2/3 Certification / Registration

ANSI Procedures for the National Adoption of ISO and IEC Standards as American National Standards

SES Certification Program

Dean C. Garfield President & CEO, Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) Committee on Energy and Commerce

Chain of Custody Standard

How To Understand The Benefits Of An Internal Audit

BSA GLOBAL CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORK

GAO FEDERAL STUDENT LOAN PROGRAMS. Opportunities Exist to Improve Audit Requirements and Oversight Procedures. Report to Congressional Committees

The National Quality Infrastructure

(Draft) Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015

Testimony. Marilyn A. Pendergast, CPA. Chair, Ethics Committee. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) before the

The IAF Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA) Certified Once Accepted Everywhere

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CLARIFIED INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING (ISAs)

Memorandum of Understanding

Enhancing Food Safety Through Third Party Certification

International Requirements for Organic Certification Bodies (IROCB)

Assist Members in developing their own national arrangements through being able to draw on and hence benefit from the experience of other members;

RECOMMENDED CHARTER FOR THE IDENTITY ECOSYSTEM STEERING GROUP

Standards and accreditation. Tools for delivering better regulation

IAF Mandatory Document

REGULATORY GUIDE 5.29 (Draft was issued as DG 5028, dated May 2012) SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

U.S. Treasury Securities Fails Charge Trading Practice

About the Proposed Refresh of the Section 508 Standards and Section 255 Guidelines for Information and Communication Technology

National Institute of Justice

INTERNATIONAL AUDITING PRACTICE STATEMENT 1013 ELECTRONIC COMMERCE EFFECT ON THE AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

How To Reduce Lead Content In Plumbing

Using Information Shield publications for ISO/IEC certification

Army Regulation Product Assurance. Army Quality Program. Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 25 February 2014 UNCLASSIFIED

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES (CBs)

IAF Mandatory Document for the use of Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques ( CAAT ) for Accredited Certification of Management Systems

How do I gain confidence in an Inspection Body? Do they need ISO 9001 certification or ISO/IEC accreditation?

Criminal Justice Offender Tracking System Certification Program Requirements

Overview of GFSI and Accredited Certification

Service Alberta BUSINESS PLAN

Interpreting the Management Process in IEEE/EIA with the Help of PMBOK

NASPAA Accreditation. Policy Briefs. Crystal Calarusse

Copyright, Language, and Version Notice The official language of this [Certification Protocol] is English. The current version of the [Certification

Docket No. DHS , Notice of Request for Public Comment Regarding Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations

IAF Informative Document. Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015. Issue 1 (IAF ID 9:2015)

International Workshop Agreement 2 Quality Management Systems Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2000 on education.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Global Statement of Business Continuity

Significant Revisions to OMB Circular A-127. Section Revision to A-127 Purpose of Revision Section 1. Purpose

ISO Strategic Plan

Preface No changes of substance have been made in the Framework, Introduction or the IESs.

Empowering sustainable and ethical supply chains

Approaches to Developing and Maintaining Professional Values, Ethics, and Attitudes

GAO. Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government. Internal Control. United States General Accounting Office.

How quality assurance reviews can strengthen the strategic value of internal auditing*

CE Marking: Your Key to Entering the European Market

Ensuring operational continuity

Strategic Plan Network Optimization & Transport Services

SRI LANKA AUDITING PRACTICE STATEMENT 1013 ELECTRONIC COMMERCE EFFECT ON THE AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Australia-wide accreditation of programs for the professional preparation of teachers. A consultation paper

ISO Asset management. Management systems: Requirements. First edition

Radio Spectrum and Technical Standards Advisory Committee

Schneider Electric appreciates the opportunity to respond to the subject NIST Request for Information.

CEN and CENELEC response to the EC Consultation on Standards in the Digital Single Market: setting priorities and ensuring delivery January 2016

Corporate Program. Consensus WE BUILD IT. Giving Industry a Direct Voice in the IEEE Standards Association

December 8, Security Authorization of Information Systems in Cloud Computing Environments

Construction Management Standards of Practice

Transcription:

American National Standards value of the ANS designation

accreditation and approval The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) coordinates, facilitates, and promotes the development of voluntary consensus standards that are relied upon by industry, government agencies, and consumers across the United States and around the world. ANSI fosters the U.S. standardization system by accrediting the procedures of standard-setting organizations and subsequently approving individual documents as American National Standards (ANS). Nearly 220 ANSI-Accredited Standards Developers are now engaged in the creation and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that are being used in virtually every industry sector. These standards developers and the experts that populate them work cooperatively to enhance the U.S. quality of life and improve the competitiveness of businesses operating in the global marketplace. A standard that has been approved as an ANS is identified as such on the document s cover or in its introductory text. Many ANS also include ANSI in their unique identifying designations.

hallmarks of the ANS process An American National Standard (ANS) is a document that has been sponsored by an ANSI-Accredited Standards Developer, achieved consensus, met ANSI s Essential Requirements, and been approved by the Institute. The hallmarks of this process ensure that American National Standards are developed in a manner that is equitable, accessible, and responsive: Participation is open to all interested stakeholders Balance of interests shall be sought Consensus must be reached by representatives from materially affected and interested parties in an environment that is free from dominance by any party Standards are required to undergo public reviews during which any member of the public may comment Comments from the consensus body and public review period must be responded to in writing All unresolved objections, attempts at resolution, and substantive changes to text are provided to the ANS consensus body for review prior to final vote An appeals process through the standards developer to address procedural concerns is required

public and national benefit From the very first American National Standard (ANS) on pipe threads to work that is underway today to meet emerging needs and priorities, ANSI-approved standards provide tremendous benefit to society and the global economy. This work spans a broad spectrum of industries: from nanotechnology and energy efficiency to telecommunications and the rapidly expanding service sector, the reach and influence of the standardization community is pervasive. Participation by a standards developer in the ANS process signifies a commitment to the creation of high-quality, market-driven standards in an open environment characterized by due process and ANSI s neutral third party oversight. ANS set benchmarks for quality and performance that help to protect the public interest and foster commerce by influencing the design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, and safe use of products and processes worldwide. market recognition Success is measured by recognition, usage, and acceptance. By reflecting generally accepted technology, ANS dramatically increase market efficiency by providing a basis upon which buyers and sellers agree to certain product and service parameters. For example, in the information technology sector, standards are relied upon to assure the interoperability of devices and systems. Without ANS, unnecessary inefficiencies and costs could result. Similarly, U.S. consumer product safety standards are widely used as models for other national, regional, and international efforts. Products and services that comply with ANS can be expected to gain greater market recognition, acceptance, and use, thereby benefitting both consumers and implementers of the standards. fairness ANSI-accredited standards developers conduct their work in a manner that is open to public scrutiny and that provides every stakeholder with an opportunity to be heard, without dominance by any party. Adherence to the ANSI Essential Requirements: Due process requirements for American National Standards results in a level playing field for all stakeholders, contributing to the development of standards that benefit those who participate in the process, the general public, and the nation. ANSI-Accredited Standards Developers offer processes that meet the Institute s requirements for: openness balance lack of dominance due process consensus Accreditation by ANSI as a standards developer represents a public statement of the value placed on an open and equitable consensus development process. Standards developers that choose to participate in this arena are dedicated to advancing voluntary consensus standardization interests within the U.S. and globally. Due process is key to ensuring that American National Standards are developed in an environment that is fair, accessible, and responsive to the needs of affected stakeholders. All ANSI-Accredited Standards Developers and all American National Standards are subject to ANSI s neutral third-party oversight via the ANSI Audit Program. Other checks and balances in place include appeals provisions, periodic review of procedures, and regular attestations by developers of compliance with ANSI s procedural requirements.

mark of quality Quality is a key facet of value for any potential customer purchasing goods or using services. Although there are different definitions of quality, by any name it has been documented as a determining factor for buyers and users of American National Standards. If conformance to requirements is the benchmark for quality, ANSI s Essential Requirements provide confidence in a due process that includes openness, balance, public notification, coordination, consideration of views, consensus, and appeals. For those who see quality as fitness for intended use, thousands of ANS have been developed and approved with testaments to their credibility, consistency, and acceptance. Where meeting or exceeding customer expectations is the definition of quality, the ANS designation has been characterized by such terms as integrity, level playing field, broad support, and responsive to market needs. legal safeguards Compliance with the ANS process requires an open and due process-based system that may help standards developers avoid antitrust and tort liability problems. ANSI s neutral oversight through the Audit Program and Board of Standards Review establishes credibility for the ANS designation while supporting a system where all parties including those with technical comments on content have the right to participate in standards development. The Standards Development Organization Advancement Act of 2004 extends certain protections, including a limitation on antitrust liability, to organizations whose procedures incorporate openness, balance, due process, appeals, and consensus. a tool for government One of the best examples of confidence in the ANS designation is the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113. This law requires all federal government agencies to use, wherever feasible, standards developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies in lieu of developing government-unique standards or regulations. The NTTAA also requires government agencies to participate in standards development processes, given that such involvement is in keeping with an agency s mission and budget priorities. OMB Circular A-119, which provides guidance to federal agencies on the implementation of the NTTAA, recognizes that the attributes of voluntary consensus standards bodies include openness, balance, consensus, due process, and appeals all the hallmarks of the ANS process. According to the circular, voluntary consensus standards help the government by: increasing operational efficiency, reducing regulatory compliance and procurement costs, avoiding duplication of effort caused by having separate private sector and government-unique solutions, enabling the government to take advantage of private sector technology and expertise in establishing standards that serve national needs, and contributing to economic prosperity and growth. Since the NTTAA became law, there has been a sizable increase in government reliance on voluntary consensus standards from the 9-11 Commission s endorsement of an ANS for disaster and emergency management to the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, which mandates compliance with ANS for all-terrain vehicles and toy safety.

The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is a private non-profit organization whose mission is to enhance U.S. global competitiveness and the American quality of life by promoting, facilitating, and safeguarding the integrity of the voluntary standardization and conformity assessment system. Comprised of organizations, government agencies, companies, academic and international bodies, and individuals, ANSI represents the interests of more than 125,000 companies and 3.5 million professionals worldwide. The Institute is the official U.S. representative to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and, via the U.S. National Committee, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and is a U.S. representative to the International Accreditation Forum (IAF). ANSI currently has offices in New York City and Washington, DC. MORE INFORMATION American National Standards Institute 25 W. 43rd Street, Fourth Floor New York, NY 10036 T: 212.642.4900 F: 212.398.0023 E: psa@ansi.org www.ansi.org