Microstructural Evaluation of KM4 and SR3 Samples Subjected to Various Heat Treatments



Similar documents
Integrated Force Method Solution to Indeterminate Structural Mechanics Problems

An Oil-Free Thrust Foil Bearing Facility Design, Calibration, and Operation

Achieving QoS for Aeronautical Telecommunication Networks Over Differentiated Services

Assessment of NASA Dual Microstructure Heat Treatment Method Utilizing Ladish SuperCooler Cooling Technology

Addressing the Real-World Challenges in the Development of Propulsion IVHM Technology Experiment (PITEX)

Tests of Full-Scale Helicopter Rotors at High Advancing Tip Mach Numbers and Advance Ratios

Simulation and Analysis of Three-Phase Rectifiers for Aerospace Power Applications

Best Practices for Researching and Documenting Lessons Learned

Secure Autonomous Automated Scheduling (SAAS) Phase 1 Final Report

A Comparison of Flow-Through Versus Non-Flow- Through Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Systems for NASA s Exploration Missions

Calibration Procedure for Measuring S-Parameters in Balun Applications on 150-Ω High-Speed Cables

EAD Expected Annual Flood Damage Computation

Optical Levitation of Micro-Scale Particles in Air

Guide to Using DoD PKI Certificates in Outlook 2000

Evaluation of Heating Methods for Thermal Structural Testing of Large Structures

Report Documentation Page

Overview Presented by: Boyd L. Summers

Security Risk Assessment Process for UAS in the NAS CNPC Architecture

On Hammershock Propagation in a Supersonic Flow Field

Thermal Barrier Coatings for Advanced Gas Turbine and Diesel Engines

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE *

NASA STI Program... in Profile

Collaborative Product Development in an R&D Environment

Heat Transfer and Flow on the Blade Tip of a Gas Turbine Equipped With a Mean-Camberline Strip

Telemedicine Workshop Summary Report

mini w Requirements Analysis Defense Commissary Agency Credit Card Program Logistics Management Institute Credit Card Terminals and Printers v / i

An Application of an Iterative Approach to DoD Software Migration Planning

Simulation of Air Flow Through a Test Chamber

ADVANCED NETWORK SECURITY PROJECT

Web-Based Instruction and Learning: Analysis and Needs Assessment

DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY

Asset Management- Acquisitions

DCAA and the Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Program

Elastomer Compatibility Testing of Renewable Diesel Fuels

Preliminary Analysis for an Optimized Oil-Free Rotorcraft Engine Concept

Using the Advancement Degree of Difficulty (AD 2 ) as an input to Risk Management

Design of a Mission Data Storage and Retrieval System for NASA Dryden Flight Research Center

A Manager's Checklist for Validating Software Cost and Schedule Estimates

Algorithmic Research and Software Development for an Industrial Strength Sparse Matrix Library for Parallel Computers

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, DC

Issue Paper. Wargaming Homeland Security and Army Reserve Component Issues. By Professor Michael Pasquarett

AUSTRALIAN INNOVATIONS

Mr. Steve Mayer, PMP, P.E. McClellan Remediation Program Manger Air Force Real Property Agency. May 11, 2011

Pima Community College Planning Grant For Autonomous Intelligent Network of Systems (AINS) Science, Mathematics & Engineering Education Center

CAPTURE-THE-FLAG: LEARNING COMPUTER SECURITY UNDER FIRE

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

Dr. Gary S. E. Lagerloef Earth and Space Research, 1910 Fairview Ave E

AFRL-RX-WP-TP

John Mathieson US Air Force (WR ALC) Systems & Software Technology Conference Salt Lake City, Utah 19 May 2011

RT 24 - Architecture, Modeling & Simulation, and Software Design

Award Number: MIPR 3GD3DJ3078. TITLE: Outcome Analysis Tool for Army Refractive Surgery Program. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Kraig S. Bower, M.D.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Optical Blade Position Tracking System Test

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. Fiscal Year 2013 Expenditure Plan Lacks Key Information Needed to Inform Future Funding Decisions

Atomic Oxygen Treatment and Its Effect on a Variety of Artist's Media

Military Health System Conference

In-Space Internet-Based Communications for Space Science Platforms Using Commercial Satellite Networks

Advanced Micro Ring Resonator Filter Technology

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

TITLE: The Impact Of Prostate Cancer Treatment-Related Symptoms On Low-Income Latino Couples

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Graduate Level Credit for Resident EWS Students. Natasha McEachin CG 1

DoD Software Migration Planning

IISUP-. NAVAL SUPPLY SVSTE:MS COMMAND. Ready. Resourceful. Responsive!

Small PV Systems Performance Evaluation at NREL's Outdoor Test Facility Using the PVUSA Power Rating Method

In June 1998 the Joint Military Intelligence. Intelligence Education for Joint Warfighting A. DENIS CLIFT

What Makes a Message Stick? - The Role of Content and Context in Social Media Epidemics

Comparison of Various Supersonic Turbine Tip Designs to Minimize Aerodynamic Loss and Tip Heating

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

A New Empirical Relationship between Thrust Coefficient and Induction Factor for the Turbulent Windmill State

Regional Field Verification Operational Results from Four Small Wind Turbines in the Pacific Northwest

Monitoring of Arctic Conditions from a Virtual Constellation of Synthetic Aperture Radar Satellites

Marketing and Promoting Solar Water Heaters to Home Builders

Cancellation of Nongroup Health Insurance Policies

Dynamic Load Balancing for Distributed Heterogeneous Computing of Parallel CFD Problems

Full Density Properties of Low Alloy Steels

A Different Kind of Deal : Selling Wind as Environmental Compliance

Non-Autoclave (Prepreg) Manufacturing Technology

COMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTION RUBBER, SILICONE

DEFENSE BUSINESS PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION BOARD

Dynamic IR Scene Projector Based Upon the Digital Micromirror Device

NAVSUP FLC NORFOLK PHILADELPHIA OFFICE

CERT Virtual Flow Collection and Analysis

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel CommandFort Detrick, Maryland

FIRST IMPRESSION EXPERIMENT REPORT (FIER)

PROBLEM STATEMENT: Will reducing the ASD for Kadena AB F-15 C/Ds increase the CPFH for this Mission Design Series (MDS)?

THE MIMOSA OPEN SOLUTION COLLABORATIVE ENGINEERING AND IT ENVIRONMENTS WORKSHOP

LMI. Improving EDI Data Quality. Logistics Management Institute. W. Michael Bridges Charles D. Guilliams MT403LN1

Evaluation of a 10 kv, 400 ka Si SGTO at High di/dt

Metal Injection Molding (MIM) of components made of Titanium and its alloys

A GPS Digital Phased Array Antenna and Receiver

METALLURGICAL EVALUATION OF SPRAY DEPOSITED AND RING ROLLED IN718

A Limited Objective Experiment on Wireless Peer-To-Peer Collaborative Networking

NASA/SP Earned Value Management (EVM) Implementation Handbook

Intelligence Community Public Key Infrastructure (IC PKI)

KEEP THIS COPY FOR REPRODUCTION PURPOSES. I ~~~~~Final Report

Software Vulnerabilities in Java

Computer-Aided Systems Engineering for Flight Research Projects Using a Workgroup Database

INFLUENCE OF THERMOMECHANICAL TREATMENT ON THE STEEL C45 FATIGUE PROPERTIES

Transcription:

NASA/TM 2004-213140 Microstructural Evaluation of KM4 and SR3 Samples Subjected to Various Heat Treatments David Ellis and Timothy Gabb Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Anita Garg University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio August 2004

The NASA STI Program Office... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the advancement of aeronautics and space science. The NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) Program Office plays a key part in helping NASA maintain this important role. The NASA STI Program Office is operated by Langley Research Center, the Lead Center for NASA s scientific and technical information. The NASA STI Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest collection of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. The Program Office is also NASA s institutional mechanism for disseminating the results of its research and development activities. These results are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which includes the following report types: TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of completed research or a major significant phase of research that present the results of NASA programs and include extensive data or theoretical analysis. Includes compilations of significant scientific and technical data and information deemed to be of continuing reference value. NASA s counterpart of peerreviewed formal professional papers but has less stringent limitations on manuscript length and extent of graphic presentations. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific and technical findings that are preliminary or of specialized interest, e.g., quick release reports, working papers, and bibliographies that contain minimal annotation. Does not contain extensive analysis. CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and technical findings by NASA-sponsored contractors and grantees. CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected papers from scientific and technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, or historical information from NASA programs, projects, and missions, often concerned with subjects having substantial public interest. TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. Englishlanguage translations of foreign scientific and technical material pertinent to NASA s mission. Specialized services that complement the STI Program Office s diverse offerings include creating custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results... even providing videos. For more information about the NASA STI Program Office, see the following: Access the NASA STI Program Home Page at http://www.sti.nasa.gov E-mail your question via the Internet to help@sti.nasa.gov Fax your question to the NASA Access Help Desk at 301 621 0134 Telephone the NASA Access Help Desk at 301 621 0390 Write to: NASA Access Help Desk NASA Center for AeroSpace Information 7121 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076

NASA/TM 2004-213140 Microstructural Evaluation of KM4 and SR3 Samples Subjected to Various Heat Treatments David Ellis and Timothy Gabb Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Anita Garg University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center August 2004

Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the extensive work of J. Schirra and E. Huron in processing, testing, and analyzing the materials. Discussions with D. Mourer and P. Reynolds are also acknowledged. Document History This research was originally published internally as HSR052 in May 1997. Trade names or manufacturers names are used in this report for identification only. This usage does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Available from NASA Center for Aerospace Information 7121 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076 National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22100 Available electronically at http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov

NASA/TM 2004-213140 i

NASA/TM 2004-213140 ii

NASA/TM 2004-213140 iii

NASA/TM 2004-213140 iv

The actual compositions of SR3 and KM4 argon-atomized powder from Homogeneous Metals Inc. are listed in Table 1 (6). Table 1 also contains the solvus temperatures for each alloy. The SR3 and KM4 power was screened, hot compacted, and extruded into three inch diameter billets. The billets were forged to yield one inch thick by seven inch diameter pancakes. NASA/TM 2004-213140 1

NASA/TM 2004-213140 2

NASA/TM 2004-213140 3

NASA/TM 2004-213140 4

2 2 NASA/TM 2004-213140 5

NASA/TM 2004-213140 6

NASA/TM 2004-213140 7

NASA/TM 2004-213140 8

NASA/TM 2004-213140 9

5 6 9 7 NASA/TM 2004-213140 10

NASA/TM 2004-213140 11

NASA/TM 2004-213140 12

NASA/TM 2004-213140 13

NASA/TM 2004-213140 14

NASA/TM 2004-213140 15

NASA/TM 2004-213140 16

NASA/TM 2004-213140 17

NASA/TM 2004-213140 18

NASA/TM 2004-213140 19

NASA/TM 2004-213140 20

NASA/TM 2004-213140 21

NASA/TM 2004-213140 22

NASA/TM 2004-213140 23 23

NASA/TM 2004-213140 24 24

NASA/TM 2004-213140 25 Coarse

NASA/TM 2004-213140 26

NASA/TM 2004-213140 27

NASA/TM 2004-213140 28 Coarse

NASA/TM 2004-213140 29

NASA/TM 2004-213140 30

NASA/TM 2004-213140 31

NASA/TM 2004-213140 32

NASA/TM 2004-213140 33

NASA/TM 2004-213140 34

NASA/TM 2004-213140 35

NASA/TM 2004-213140 36

NASA/TM 2004-213140 37

NASA/TM 2004-213140 38

NASA/TM 2004-213140 39

NASA/TM 2004-213140 40

NASA/TM 2004-213140 41

NASA/TM 2004-213140 42

NASA/TM 2004-213140 43

NASA/TM 2004-213140 44

NASA/TM 2004-213140 45

NASA/TM 2004-213140 46

NASA/TM 2004-213140 4747

NASA/TM 2004-213140 48 (d) MS4. (b) MS2. Figure 2. Comparison of general microstructure and phases identified in SR3 MS series samples MS1 MS4. A = (Ti,Nb)C. H = (Hf,Zr)O2. S = Secondary γ'. (c) MS3. (a) MS1.

NASA/TM 2004-213140 49 (h) MS6. (f) MS5. Figure 2. Continued. Comparison of general microstructure and phases identified in SR3 MS series samples MS4F MS6. A = (Ti,Nb)C. H = (Hf,Zr)O2. S = Secondary γ'. (g) MS5F. (e) MS4F.

(i) MS7. (j) MS8. Figure 2. Concluded. Comparison of general microstructure and phases identified in SR3 MS series samples MS7 MS8. A = (Ti,Nb)C. H = (Hf,Zr)O 2. S = Secondary γ'. NASA/TM 2004-213140 50

NASA/TM 2004-213140 51 (d) MS4. (b) MS2. Figure 3. Comparison of heavily loaded grain boundaries in SR3 MS series samples MS1 MS4. A = (Ti,Nb)C. H = (Hf,Zr)O2. S = Secondary γ'. C = (Cr,Mo)23C6. (c) MS3. (a) MS1.

NASA/TM 2004-213140 52 (h) MS6. (f) MS5. Figure 3. Continued. Comparison of heavily loaded grain boundaries in SR3 MS series samples MS4F MS6. A = (Ti,Nb)C. H = (Hf,Zr)O2. S = Secondary γ'. C = (Cr,Mo)23C6. (g) MS5F. (e) MS4F.

(i) MS7. (j) MS8. Figure 3. Concluded. Comparison of heavily loaded grain boundaries in SR3 MS series samples MS7 MS8. A = (Ti,Nb)C. H = (Hf,Zr)O 2. S = Secondary γ'. C = (Cr,Mo) 23 C 6. NASA/TM 2004-213140 53

(a) MK1. (b) MK2. (c) MK3. (d) MK4. Figure 4. Comparison of general microstructure and phases identified in KM4 MK series samples MK1 MK4. A = (Ti,Nb)C. D = Al 2 O 3. S = Secondary γ'. X = (Ti,Mo) 6 C. C = (Cr,Mo) 23 C 6. NASA/TM 2004-213140 54

NASA/TM 2004-213140 55 (f) MK6. (h) MK8. Figure 4. Concluded. Comparison of general microstructure and phases identified in KM4 MK series samples MK5 MK8. A = (Ti,Nb)C. D = Al2O3. S = Secondary γ'. X = (Ti,Mo)6C. C = (Cr,Mo)23C6. (g) MK7. (e) MK5.

(a) MK1. (b) MK2. (c) MK3. (d) MK4. Figure 5. Comparison of heavily loaded grain boundaries in KM4 MK series samples MK1 MK4. A = (Ti,Nb)C. D = Al 2 O 3. S = Secondary γ'. X = (Ti,Mo) 6 C. C = (Cr,Mo) 23 C 6. NASA/TM 2004-213140 56

(e) MK5. (f) MK6. (g) MK7. (h) MK8. Figure 5. Concluded. Comparison of heavily loaded grain boundaries in KM4 MK series samples MK5 MK8. A = (Ti,Nb)C. D = Al 2 O 3. S = Secondary γ'. X = (Ti,Mo) 6 C. C = (Cr,Mo) 23 C 6. NASA/TM 2004-213140 57

(i) MS1. (ii) MS2. (iii) MS3. (iv) MS4. Figure 6. Comparison of γ' distributions in SR3 MS series samples MS1 MS4. NASA/TM 2004-213140 58

(v) MS5. (vi) MS6. (vii) MS7. (viii) MS8. Figure 6. Continued. Comparison of γ' distributions in SR3 MS series samples MS5 MS8. NASA/TM 2004-213140 59

(i) MS4F. (ii) MS5F. Figure 6. Concluded. Comparison of γ' distributions in SR3 MS series samples MS4F MS5F. NASA/TM 2004-213140 60

NASA/TM 2004-213140 61

NASA/TM 2004-213140 62 62

NASA/TM 2004-213140 63 63

(a) MK1. (b) MK2. (c) MK3. (d) MK4. Figure 8. Comparison of γ' distributions in KM4 MK series samples MK1 MK4. NASA/TM 2004-213140 64

(e) MK5. (f) MK6. (g) MK7. (h) MK8. Figure 8. Concluded. Comparison of γ' distributions in KM4 MK series samples MK5 MK8. NASA/TM 2004-213140 65

NASA/TM 2004-213140 66

67 NASA/TM 2004-213140 67

NASA/TM 2004-213140 6868

NASA/TM 2004-213140 69

NASA/TM 2004-213140 70

NASA/TM 2004-213140 71

NASA/TM 2004-213140 72

NASA/TM 2004-213140 73

NASA/TM 2004-213140 74

NASA/TM 2004-213140 75

NASA/TM 2004-213140 76

NASA/TM 2004-213140 77

NASA/TM 2004-213140 78

NASA/TM 2004-213140 79

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 6. AUTHOR(S) August 2004 Microstructural Evaluation of KM4 and SR3 Samples Subjected to Various Heat Treatments David Ellis, Timothy Gabb, and Anita Garg Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Technical Memorandum 5. FUNDING NUMBERS WBS 22 714 09 46 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Cleveland, Ohio 44135 3191 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER E 14654 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546 0001 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER NASA TM 2004-213140 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This research was originally published internally as HSR052 in May 1997. David Ellis and Timothy Gabb, NASA Glenn Research Center; and Anita Garg, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606. Responsible person, Timothy Gabb, organization code 5120, 216 433 3272. 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Unclassified -Unlimited Subject Category: 07 Available electronically at http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov This publication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, 301 621 0390. 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) Distribution: Nonstandard 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE The γ-γ' microstructures of two advanced powder metallurgy disk alloys, KM4 and SR3, were quantified after a series of heat treatments using transmission electron microscopy and image analysis. Relationships between the heat treatments and the resulting γ' distributions were evaluated. Statistical correlations between the γ' distributions and the reported tensile strengths, creep resistances, and dwell crack growth resistances were separately assessed for each alloy. To avoid the effects of grain size related mechanisms, the grain size of the samples used in the correlations for each alloy were limited to narrow ranges of about 1.5 in ASTM grain size number. In both alloys, yield and tensile strength increased with increasing fraction of medium sized γ'. The strength increased as the size of the medium γ' decreased and the size of the fine γ' increased. Time to 0.2 percent creep in SR3 increased with increasing medium γ' volume fraction, and decreasing fine γ' sizes. However, 0.2 percent creep time was not clearly correlated with the γ' microstructures of KM4 specimens, apparently due to effects of stabilization heat treatments which greatly suppress creep resistance. Dwell fatigue crack growth rate decreased with increasing medium γ' volume fraction, indicating more medium γ' is beneficial. The crack growth rate also decreased with decreasing γ' size, indicating finer γ' is better. 14. SUBJECT TERMS Disk; Superalloy 15. NUMBER OF PAGES 89 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT Unclassified 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE Unclassified 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT Unclassified 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18 298-102