USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES. by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch



Similar documents
Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

The International Workshop on Micropiles, 2007

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations

Chapter 9 Remedial Measures

High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

Outline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.

ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE

CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples

The Original Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer System

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

BUTE Department of Construction Management and Technology

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

UNDERPINNING OF NEW STUDENT HOUSING BUILDING USING MICROPILES, NORTH CAROLINA USA

Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility

SETTLEMENT INSTRUMENTATION & MONITORING

Geotechnical Building Works (GBW) Submission Requirements

The Installation and Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

Page B-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 LOAD TESTS

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: FORMTECH ENTERPRISES, INC. SERIES/MODEL: Truline PRODUCT TYPE: PVC Seawall

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Step 11 Static Load Testing

~iffiui ~ Bridge Condition Survey. Inspection Date: 21 May 2003 District: San Angelo County: Tom Green Highway:

The Stabilizer TM. Benefits. Supplemental support system for sagging beams and floor joists within a crawl space

Re: Damages to Alaska Building from Legislative Information Office Construction

A Solid Foundation Solution for Homeowners. from. Our products are made with 90% Recycled Material Down. Right. Solid. GREEN.

Table of Contents 16.1 GENERAL Overview Responsibilities

Foundations 65 5 FOUNDATIONS. by Richard Chylinski, FAIA and Timothy P. McCormick, P.E. Seismic Retrofit Training

Source: Port Mann Bridge Plans Unveiled Today, CBC News, February 4, 2009.

Chapter. Restoration of Damaged Structures

Design and Construction of Auger Cast Piles

October 30, Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Vick 101 Southwind Cove Benton, AR. Report of Findings, Structural Investigation, Benton, Arkansas, Dear Mr.

PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE

REPAIR AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES DAMAGED BY THE 2010 CHILE MAULE EARTHQUAKE

Paper The relation of Micropile Diameters in case of Pressure casting and non-pressure casting (30)

Strengthening and Repair of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Ian Wienholt Business Development Manager

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

Up-Down Construction Utilizing Steel Sheet Piles and Drilled Shaft Foundations

SECTION 7 Engineered Buildings Field Investigation

Method Statement for Static Load Testing (Compression) for Micropiles

DESIGNING STRUCTURES IN EXPANSIVE CLAY

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

Designed and Engineered to Perform

The Impact of Market Demands on Residential Post-Tensioned Foundation Design: An Ethical Dilemma

PC-Concrete Injectable Concrete Anchoring and Repair System

ATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

Foundation Experts, LLC Specializes in Foundation Repair and Waterproofing

Important Points: Timing: Timing Evaluation Methodology Example Immediate First announcement of building damage

FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE

Stability. Security. Integrity.

Underpinning Systems 14.1 FOUNDATION REPAIR. Helical Piles

ITEM # OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFT

Designed and Engineered to Perform

Caltrans Geotechnical Manual

GEORGE J. CAMBOURAKIS, P.E., C. ENG. PRESIDENT & CHIEF STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

Pro-Lift Steel Pile Foundation Repair

MEMORANDUM West Swann Avenue, Suite 225 Tampa, Florida Phone (813) Fax (813)

IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2

ASSESSMENT AND PROPOSED STRUCTURAL REPAIR STRATEGIES FOR BRIDGE PIERS IN TAIWAN DAMAGED BY THE JI-JI EARTHQUAKE ABSTRACT

Design, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils

Engineered, Time-Tested Foundation Repairs for Settlement in Residential and Light Commercial Structures. The Leading Edge.

MICROPILE FOUNDATIONS IN KARST: STATIC AND DYNAMIC TESTING VARIABILITY

Materials. Estimating Steel. Players. Materials. Shop Drawings. Detailing Process. Standard shapes. Fabricated members, Built-up sections

System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

Supplier ID: Local Office: GLASGOW 69 Buchanan Street Glasgow G1 3HL

Emergency repair of Bridge B421

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

Instrumentations, Pile Group Load Testing, and Data Analysis Part II: Design & Analysis of Lateral Load Test. Murad Abu-Farsakh, Ph.D., P.E.

Ecoflex Wall Penetration Systems: An efficient, sustainable solution for penetrating concrete or block walls

Value of Instrumentation Systems and Real-Time Monitoring: An Owner s Perspective

Foundation Repair Fundamentals And how they relate to the Real Estate Industry in the DFW Area

Structural Foundation System

TYPES OF PIERS USED IN NORTH AND EAST TEXAS RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION REPAIR

DESIGN-BUILD SUPPORT OF EXCAVATION FOR BLOCK 76. Rick Deschamps and Tom Hurley, Nicholson Construction, Pittsburgh, PA USA

Elevating Your House. Introduction CHAPTER 5

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT. Full Metal Jacket Building 0 Prince Street, Alexandria, VA

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

Guidance on Detailed Engineering Evaluation of Nonresidential buildings

Texas Building Pros Foundation Repair Services

Evaluation of Appropriate Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation Methods for Iowa Bridges

14 September Sarah Zorn Planning and Economic Development 25 West Fourth Street, Ste St. Paul, MN 55102

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions

Quality Control and Quality Assurance Guide

Foundation Underpinning Process and Relationship with Groundwater in West- Central Florida

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

Investigation of Foundation Failure. Step 1 - Data Collection. Investigation Steps

symptoms of a faulty foundation

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

POST FOUNDATION REPAIR PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL AND OTHER LOW-RISE BUILDINGS ON EXPANSIVE SOILS. The Repair Committee of

SEISMIC UPGRADE OF OAK STREET BRIDGE WITH GFRP

Transcription:

USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

DEFINITION OF A MICROPILE A micropile is a small diameter (typically less than 12 in.), drilled and grouted nondisplacement pile that is typically reinforced

MICROPILE APPLICATIONS IN-SITU EARTH REINFORCEMENT FOUNDATION STRUCTURAL SUPPORT ~ 95% of the applications world wide

MICROPILE APPLICATIONS FOUNDATION STRUCTURAL SUPPORT Foundations for New Structures Underpinning of Existing Structures Repair/Replacement of Existing Foundations Upgrading of Foundation Capacity

MICROPILES ADVANTAGES used in restricted overhead access areas used in close proximity to existing structures used in difficult ground conditions (karst areas, uncontrolled fill, etc.) may be placed on an incline (i.e. battered) DISADVANTAGES vertical micropiles may be limited in lateral capacity due to their slenderness ratio micropiles are limited in axial capacity cost

MICROPILE COST FOUNDATION TYPE COST ($/LF) MICROPILES 150 DRILL SHAFT (18) 41 DRILL SHAFT (24) 85 DRILL SHAFT (30) 106 DRILL SHAFT (36) 112 DRILL SHAFT (42) 131 DRILL SHAFT (48) 203 MICROPILES COST = ~ 42 TO 48 inch DRILLED SHAFTS

EXAMPLE OF THE USE OF MICROPILES - Underpinning of a bridge

BRIDGE LAYOUT

EAST Phased Construction WEST

PROBLEMS OBSERVED DURING CONSTRUCTION Bent 5 showed signs of distress shortly after pouring the slab. The outer column of bent 5 settled 4 the day after the slab pour. No cracking of the bridge slab was observed, which indicates the settlement occurred while the deck concrete was curing.

Bent 4 Bent 5

Column Bent 5

Column Bent 5

What to do? Obtain additional borings along the structure Evaluate the foundations using the new borings

Additional Boreholes - Location

Additional Boreholes - Location

Location of Additional Boreholes B-8 B-4A B-11 Bent 4 B-3A B-3B Bent 5 B-7

Bore Logs - Bent 5 B4A B11 DS Tip = 360.0 358.8 DS Tip = 360.0 354.0

Bore Logs - Bent 5 B3A B3B DS Tip = 360.0 342.8

Bore Logs - Bent 4 B8 B7 DS Tip = 366.0 364.5 DS Tip = 366.0 363.5

Based on the new borings the drilled shafts for Bents 4 and 5 were of insufficient length Bents 4 and 5 needed to be repaired to restore the capacity of the foundation elements Revised drilled shaft tip elevations were provided for Phase 2 construction

Repair Options Option 1 - Underpin Bents 4 and 5 by placing drilled shafts along the bent line. Shafts would be connected with a tie beam incorporating the existing columns. Option 2 Underpin bents 4 and 5 by placing drilled shafts perpendicular to the bent line, and installing two shafts per installed drilled shaft. Shafts would be connected with a footing tied into the existing column. Option 3 Underpin bents 4 and 5 by placing micropiles. A footing would be placed on the micropile group and tied into the existing column. Option 4 Remove the superstructure over Bents 4 and 5 and associated bent caps to allow installation of drilled shafts to proper design length. Rebuild bent and superstructure.

REVIEW OF SITE CONDITIONS EAST WEST 5 ~25

Repair Options Option 1 - Underpin Bents 4 and 5 by placing drilled shafts along the bent line. Shafts would be connected with a tie beam incorporating the existing columns. Option 2 Underpin bents 4 and 5 by placing drilled shafts perpendicular to the bent line, and installing two shafts per installed drilled shaft. Shafts would be connected with a footing tied into the existing column. Option 3 Underpin bents 4 and 5 by placing micropiles. A footing would be placed on the micropile group and tied into the existing column. Option 4 Remove the superstructure over Bents 4 and 5 and associated bent caps to allow installation of drilled shafts to proper design length. Rebuild bent and superstructure.

Micropile Repair Option The design of micropiles was conducted under TxDOT supervision. The allowable design load was 60 Tons/micropile. The total length of each micropile was estimated as 70.0 with a bond zone of 30.0 min. into stiff strata. The reinforcing bar consisted of 1 ¾ (#14) dia, grade 75, equipped with post grout tubing and centralizers. Micropiles were 8 diameter (grout filled, post grouted and cased with N80 casing 9 from surface). Grout Strength = 4000 psi.

Micropiles Repair Option Four micropiles were installed per drilled shaft and tied to the existing column with a pile footing. The pile footing was designed by TxDOT. Prior to installation of production piling, one sacrificial micropile was tested under tension load, in accordance with ASTM D3689 Quick Test. The test pile performed adequately with a deflection of 0.026 at 60 Ton (design load) and 0.386 at 120 Ton (maximum test load).

Micropile Repair Option

Footing Retrofit (Bent 4)

LOAD TEST Bent Line Trucks

Load Test Results Test Load ~ 90% of Design Load Bent 4: No appreciable movement was measured under a 20 min. hold at the test load. Bent 5: A maximum measured settlement of 0.007 was observed for the sustained test load. Once the load was taken off of the bent, a recovery of 0.003 of elastic settlement was noticed.

SUPERSTRUCTURE REPAIR Micropiles and the associated footings stabilized the foundations for Bents 4 and 5 The superstructure was restored by jacking it up to the required elevations.

Bridge Deck Prior to Foundation Stabilization and Jacking Up of the Beams

Bridge Deck After Foundation Stabilization and Jacking Up of the Beams

CONCLUSIONS Micropiles can be used for foundation support on new bridges and to underpin existing structures Micropiles are commonly used : - in restricted overhead access areas - in close proximity to existing structures When used in appropriate conditions micropiles can be cost effective

Questions?