DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE - SAR RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION - EU EN 62311:2008



Similar documents
SAMSUNG GT-S5369 (mobile phone) Serial number: IMEI Mr. Antoine SAMAKH and Mr. Mathieu SAMAKH FRANCE

SAR Test Report: Type Number FAD BV; FCC ID PY7FD022012; IC 4170B-FD022012

SAR TEST REPORT. According to the standard: EN : 2006

FCC OET BULLETIN 65 SUPPLEMENT C IEEE Std and 1528a (Class II Permissive Change) SAR EVALUATION REPORT. For.

Body SAR and EU. B. Derat

Radio Frequency (RF) Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands)

September 26, 2000 IMST GmbH Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Str. 2 D Kamp-Lintfort

For many years the general public

How To Understand The Safety Of A Cell Phone (Cell Phone)

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE SAR EVALUATION

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Test Report

R&D TESTING SAR EVALUATION

RF EXPOSURE LIMITS AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS

Millennium Product Inc. Model: Cell Shield / Zorb

IEC TC106. Standards for the Assessment of Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 to 300 GHz

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the head of Tablet user's

RF Exposure Procedures TCB Workshop October 2012

SAR TEST REPORT. No. I14D00063-SAR. For. Client : ZTE Corporation. Production : LTE/WCDMA/GSM Multi-Mode. Digital Mobile Phone

RF EXPOSURE PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION POLICIES FOR MOBILE AND PORTABLE DEVICES

ARIB TR-T V Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations in different regions

SAR Comparison Report

Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division Public Draft Review

Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division

EN v1.2.1 TEST REPORT FOR ag/Draft n WLAN PCI-E Mini Card MODEL NUMBER: BCM94322MC REPORT NUMBER: 07U

Measurement of RF Emissions from a Final Coat Electronics Corrosion Module

EN 50360:2001+A1:2012 SAR EVALUATION REPORT. Baoji Jiayuyutong electronic co.,ltd

Radio Frequency Exposure Test Report

Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

The field strength measurement and SAR experience related to human exposure in 110 MHz to 40 GHz

Mobile Phone SAR Analysis through Experimental and Numerical Simulation

Overview of RF Exposure Concepts and Requirements

Human Exposure Limits

Assessment of Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation from Wireless Devices in Home and Office Environments

Evaluating Cell Phone and Personal Communications Equipment and their EMC Effects on Automotive Audio and In-Cabin Modules

Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

Temperature Rise Measurements

Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation onto Human Head with Variation of Holding Cheek and Tilt Positions

TCB RF Exposure Training

Impedance 50 (75 connectors via adapters)

SAR TESTS ON MOBILE PHONES USED WITH AND WITHOUT PERSONAL HANDS-FREE KITS

Report Of. Shielding Effectiveness Test For. SafeSleeve Radiation Shielding Technology. Test Date(s): June 07 June 09, 2015

Human exposure to RF

Electromagnetic Field Safety

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Induced in Human Heads of Various Sizes When Using a Mobile Phone

RF safety at base station sites

Effect of Metallic Materials on SAR

RF Exposure and Modular Equipment. Considerations

Test Report. Prepared for: Technologic Systems, Inc. Model: TS-8820

RF Exposure Evaluation Report

SAR Distribution in Test Animals Exposed to RF Radiation

Continuous, remote monitoring and logging of electromagnetic fields

SAR ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF HANDS-FREE MOBILE TELEPHONES

EMR-300 Broadband RF Survey Meter

Measuring electric and magnetic fields

EMR COMPLIANCE HOW TO ENSURE YOUR NATA ACCREDITED CONTRACTOR IS ABLE TO PROVIDE A NATA ENDORSED REPORT

Technical limits of Human Exposure to RF from Cellular Base Stations and Handsets

Real-life Applications of ICNIRP Guidelines to Various Human EMF Exposure Issues

Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Report Test results of Floww equipment

Summary of ICES TC34 Activities

Wireless Broadband: Health & Safety Information

FCC RF Exposure Report

COMMON REGULATORY OBJECTIVES FOR WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK (WLAN) EQUIPMENT PART 2 SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF WLAN EQUIPMENT

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

Measurements of radiofrequency fields from a WEL Networks Smart Meter

Agilent N8973A, N8974A, N8975A NFA Series Noise Figure Analyzers. Data Sheet

Human Exposure to Outdoor PLC System

GETTING TO KNOW YOUR PRE-PAID TELSTRA WI-FI 4G

R&S ZNBT8 Vector Network Analyzer Specifications

RICHARD T ELL ASSOCIATES,INC.

telstra.com/ppmbb visit a telstra store or partner GETTING TO KNOW YOUR

Turbo X channel UHF true diversity

Design and Certification of ASH Radio Systems for Japan

Regulation for wireless telecommunication equipment

R&S ZNC Vector Network Analyzer Specifications

Occupational Exposure Assessment on an FM Mast: Electric Field and SAR Values

Microwave Meter. Instruction Manual

Rated Power(W) 8W 2. EG-LED W 3. EG-LED W

Radio waves and health. Mobile communications

ELECRAFT KX3 EXTENDED VFO TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION PROCEDURE Copyright 2012 Elecraft LLC Rev. A8, October 27, 2012

How To Know If You Are Safe To Use An Antenna (Wired) Or Wireless (Wireless)

Technical Datasheet Scalar Network Analyzer Model MHz to 40 GHz

Nardalert S3 Non-Ionizing Radiation Monitor

AN437. Si4432 RF PERFORMANCE AND FCC COMPLIANCE TEST RESULTS. 1. Introduction. 2. Relevant Measurements to comply with FCC

Flexible PCB Antenna with Cable Integration Application Note Version 2

THE FIRST ROMANIAN SAR MEASUREMENT FACILITY WILL BE OPERATIONAL IN 2009

Spectrum and Power Measurements Using the E6474A Wireless Network Optimization Platform

CellAdvisor. JD725A Dual-Port Cable and Antenna Analyzer

R&S R-Line Compact Test Chamber Precise measurements of radiated emissions of wireless terminals 800 MHz to 18 GHz

Annex to the joint statement: Exposure of the general public to radiofrequency fields

USB Smart Power Sensor

EMC TEST REPORT For. Webcam. Model Number: CAM67U

MYRICOM, INC. TEST REPORT FOR THE SERVER RACK, 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2S & 10G-PCIE2-8B2-2QP FCC PART 15 SUBPART B SECTIONS AND CLASS A TESTING

Synthetic Sensing: Proximity / Distance Sensors

TEST REPORT EN (1997) +A1 (2001)

Numerical Computation of the Combined Specific Absorption Rates Induced in Human Head due to Multiple Independent Sources

Assessment of SAR in a human exposed to GSM electromagnetic fields

MAINTENANCE & ADJUSTMENT

Transcription:

DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE - SAR RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION - EU EN 62311:2008 Test Lab Information Name Address CELLTECH LABS INC. 21-364 Lougheed Road, Kelowna, B.C. V1X 7R8 Canada Test Lab Accreditation(s) A2LA ISO/IEC 17025:2005 (A2LA Test Lab Certificate No. 2470.01) Applicant Information Standard(s) Applied Procedure(s) Applied Device Model(s) Test Sample Serial No. Test Sample Hardware Revision No. Name Address EU IEC IEC DIVER Test Sample Firmware Revision No. V 0.31 030 (Identical Prototype) Date of Sample Receipt May 26, 2011 Date(s) of Evaluations Device-Under-Test Description (DUT) Device Mode(s) of Operation Transmitter Frequency Range(s) Manuf. Rated Output Power Spec. NAUTILUS LIFELINE LTD. P.O. Box 97182, Richmond, British Columbia, V6X 8H3 Canada European Council Directive 2004/40/EC European Council Directive 89/391/EEC EN 62311:2008 - Assessment of electronic and electrical equipment related to human exposure restrictions for electromagnetic fields (0 Hz - 300 GHz) International Standard 62209-1:2005 - Human exposure to RF fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices - Part 1: Handheld devices used in close proximity to the ear (300 MHz - 3 GHz) International Standard IEC 62209-2 Edition 1.0 2010-03 - Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held & body-mounted wireless communication devices - Part 2: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz) REV E PCB modified to REV F assembly Portable VHF PTT Marine Diver Radio Transceiver with GPS FM 156.025-157.425 MHz (VHF Marine Band) 1.85 Watts Conducted (+0/-3.5 db) Measured RF Output Power 1.85 Watts 32.67 dbm Conducted 156.8 MHz Antenna Type Tested External Whip Battery Type Tested Lithium-ion 3.7 V 1800 mah P/N: G Series Body-worn Accessory Tested Audio Accessory Tested n/a (DUT does not support body-worn transmissions) n/a (DUT does not support external audio connection) Max. SAR Level(s) Evaluated Face-held 0.109 W/kg 10g 50% PTT duty cycle General Public FCC/IC Spatial Peak SAR Limit Head 2.0 W/kg 10g 50% PTT duty cycle Celltech Labs Inc. declares under its sole responsibility that this device has demonstrated compliance with the (SAR) RF exposure requirements for the General Public exposure environment specified in European Council Directives 2004/40/EC, 89/391/EEC and ICNIRP Guidelines For Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz): 1998. The device was tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in International Standard IEC 62209-1:2005 and International Standard IEC 62209-2:2010. All measurements were performed in accordance with the SAR system manufacturer recommendations. All measurements were performed in accordance with the SAR system manufacturer recommendations. As an ISO 17025 accredited test facility, Celltech Labs Inc. is satisfied that the FCC SAR test procedures for Occupational PTT Radios, as specified in FCC KDB Publication 643646 and applied herein, are applicable to demonstrate that this device complies with the requirements of EN 62311:2008, IEC 62209-1:2005 and IEC 62209-2:2010. I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications of all persons taking them. This test report shall not be reproduced partially, or in full, without the prior written approval of Celltech Labs Inc. The results and statements contained in this report pertain only to the device(s) evaluated. Test Report Approved By Sean Johnston Lab Manager Celltech Labs Inc. 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 1 of 35

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 2.0 SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM 4 3.0 RF CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT 5 4.0 NO. OF TEST CHANNELS (N C ) 5 5.0 FLUID DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS 6 6.0 SAR MEASUREMENT SUMMARY 7 7.0 SAR SCALING (MANUFACTURER S TUNE-UP TOLERANCE) 8 8.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES 8 9.0 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK 9 10.0 SIMULATED EQUIVALENT TISSUES 10 11.0 SAR LIMITS 10 12.0 ROBOT SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS 11 13.0 PROBE SPECIFICATION (ET3DV6) 12 14.0 SIDE PLANAR PHANTOM 12 15.0 BARSKI PLANAR PHANTOM 12 16.0 DEVICE HOLDER 12 17.0 TEST EQUIPMENT LIST 13 18.0 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES 13 19.0 REFERENCES 13 APPENDIX A - SAR MEASUREMENT DATA 13 APPENDIX B - SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK DATA 13 APPENDIX C - MEASURED FLUID DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS 13 APPENDIX D - SAR TEST SETUP & DUT PHOTOGRAPHS 13 APPENDIX E - DIPOLE CALIBRATION 13 APPENDIX F - PROBE CALIBRATION 13 APPENDIX G - BARSKI PHANTOM CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY 13 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 2 of 35

REVISION HISTORY REVISION NO. DESCRIPTION IMPLEMENTED BY RELEASE DATE 1.0 Initial Release Jon Hughes TEST REPORT SIGN-OFF DEVICE TESTED BY REPORT PREPARED BY QA REVIEW BY REPORT APPROVED BY Mike Meaker Mike Meaker Jon Hughes Sean Johnston 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 3 of 35

1.0 INTRODUCTION This measurement report demonstrates that the Nautilus Lifeline Ltd. Model: DIVER Portable FM VHF PTT Marine Radio Transceiver complies with the SAR () RF exposure requirements specified in European Council Directive 2004/40/EC (see reference [1]), Council Directive 89/391/EEC (see reference [2]) and International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (see reference [3]) for the General Public Exposure environment. The measurement procedures described in IEC 62209-1:2005 (see reference [5]) and IEC 62209-2:2010 (see reference [6]) were employed. A description of the device, operating configuration, detailed summary of the test results, methodology and procedures used in the evaluation, equipment used and the various provisions of the rules are included within this test report. 2.0 SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM Celltech Labs Inc. SAR measurement facility utilizes the Dosimetric Assessment System (DASY ) manufactured by Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG ) of Zurich, Switzerland. The DASY4 measurement system is comprised of the measurement server, robot controller, computer, near-field probe, probe alignment sensor, specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) phantom, and various planar phantoms for Head and/or Body SAR evaluations. The robot is a six-axis industrial robot performing precise movements to position the probe to the location (points) of maximum electromagnetic field (EMF). A cell controller system contains the power supply, robot controller, teach pendant (Joystick), and remote control, is used to drive the robot motors. The Staubli robot is connected to the cell controller to allow software manipulation of the robot. A data acquisition electronic (DAE) circuit performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. is connected to the Electrooptical coupler (EOC). The EOC performs the conversion from the optical into digital electric signal of the DAE and transfers data to the DASY4 measurement server. The DAE4 utilizes a highly sensitive electrometer-grade preamplifier with auto-zeroing, a channel and gain-switching multiplexer, a fast 16-bit AD-converter and a command decoder and control logic unit. Transmission to the DASY4 measurement server is accomplished through an optical downlink for data and status information and an optical uplink for commands and clock lines. The mechanical probe-mounting device includes two different sensor systems for frontal and sidewise probe contacts. The sensor systems are also used for mechanical surface detection and probe collision detection. The robot utilizes a controller with built in VME-bus computer. DASY4 SAR System with Plexiglas side planar phantom 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 4 of 35

3.0 RF CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT MEASURED RF CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER Band Frequency Channel Mode Measured Power Level dbm Watts Method Notes VHF 156.8 MHz 16 CW 32.67 1.85 Average Conducted 1. The RF conducted output power level of the DUT was measured by Celltech prior to the SAR evaluation using a Gigatronics 8652A Universal Power Meter at the antenna connector of the radio. 4.0 NO. OF TEST CHANNELS (N c ) Transmit Freq. Range Frequency Band N c Test Frequencies (MHz) 156.025-157.425 MHz VHF Marine 1 156.7 MHz Note: The number of test channels per antenna frequency range was calculated in accordance with the procedures specified in FCC KDB 447498 Section 6) c) (see reference [7]). 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 5 of 35

5.0 FLUID DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS FLUID DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS Date: 06/06/2011 Frequency: 150 MHz Tissue: Head Freq Test_e Test_s Target_e Target_s Deviation Permittivity Deviation Conductivity 0.050 83.82 0.67 52.3 0.76 60.27% -11.84% 0.060 71.16 0.68 52.3 0.76 36.06% -10.53% 0.070 66.32 0.71 52.3 0.76 26.81% -6.58% 0.080 65.43 0.72 52.3 0.76 25.11% -5.26% 0.090 61.72 0.7 52.3 0.76 18.01% -7.89% 0.100 57.48 0.74 52.3 0.76 9.90% -2.63% 0.110 61.94 0.72 52.3 0.76 18.43% -5.26% 0.120 58.94 0.74 52.3 0.76 12.70% -2.63% 0.130 57.23 0.74 52.3 0.76 9.43% -2.63% 0.140 59.86 0.78 52.3 0.76 14.46% 2.63% 0.150 55.11 0.78 52.3 0.76 5.37% 2.63% 0.1568* 53.8 0.78 52.3 0.76 2.87% 2.63% 0.160 53.24 0.78 52.3 0.76 1.80% 2.63% 0.170 53.9 0.77 52.3 0.76 3.06% 1.32% 0.180 53.3 0.79 52.3 0.76 1.91% 3.95% 0.190 54.94 0.81 52.3 0.76 5.05% 6.58% 0.200 51.46 0.8 52.3 0.76-1.61% 5.26% 0.210 50.93 0.81 52.3 0.76-2.62% 6.58% 0.220 51.71 0.83 52.3 0.76-1.13% 9.21% 0.230 49.98 0.85 52.3 0.76-4.44% 11.84% 0.240 51.34 0.86 52.3 0.76-1.84% 13.16% 0.250 49.19 0.86 52.3 0.76-5.95% 13.16% *interpolated using DASY4 software 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 6 of 35

6.0 SAR MEASUREMENT SUMMARY SAR MEASUREMENT RESULTS Test Config. Test Date Test Freq. Test Channel Battery Type Conducted Power Before Test Device Distance to Planar Phantom Measured SAR 10g (W/kg) PTT Duty Cycle SAR Drift During Test Scaled SAR with droop 10g (W/kg) PTT Duty Cycle MHz Watts DUT Antenna 100% 50% db 100% 50% FACE Jun 6 156.8 16 Li-ion 1.85 2.5 cm 5.0 cm 0.198 0.099-0.398 0.217 0.109 SAR LIMIT(S) HEAD SPATIAL PEAK RF EXPOSURE CATEGORY ICNIRP 2.0 W/kg averaged over 10 gram General Public Measured Fluid Type 150 MHz Head 156.7 MHz Meas.* Atmospheric Pressure 101.1 kpa Dielectric Constant Target Meas. Dev. Relative Humidity 33 % ε r 52.3 + 10% 53.8 +2.9% Ambient Temperature 22 C Measured Fluid Type 150 MHz Head 156.7 MHz Meas.* Fluid Temperature 22 C Conductivity Target Meas. Dev. Fluid Depth 15 cm σ (mho/m) 0.76 + 10% 0.78 +2.6% ρ (Kg/m 3 ) 1000 * Note: Interpolated using DASY4 Software Notes 1. Detailed measurement data and plots showing the maximum SAR location of the DUT are reported in Appendix A. 2. 3. 4. The face-held SAR evaluation was performed with the front of the radio placed parallel to the outer surface of the planar phantom. A 2.5 cm spacing was maintained between the front side of the DUT and the outer surface of the planar phantom. The SAR drift of the DUT was measured by the DASY4 system for the duration of the SAR evaluations. A SAR- versus-time power slump evaluation was performed in the test configuration that reported the maximum measured SAR droop. See Appendix A (SAR Test Plots) for SAR-versus-Time power droop evaluation plot. The DUT was tested at the maximum conducted output power level in unmodulated continuous transmit operation (Continuous Wave mode at 100% duty cycle) with the transmit key constantly depressed. For a push-to-talk device the 50% duty cycle compensation reported assumes a transmit/receive cycle of equal time base. 5. The area scan evaluation was performed with a fully charged battery. After the area scan was completed the radio was cooled down and the battery was replaced with a fully charged battery prior to the zoom scan evaluation. 6. The fluid temperature remained within +/-2 C from the dielectric parameter measurement to the completion of each SAR test. 7. The dielectric parameters of the simulated tissue mixtures were measured prior to the SAR evaluations using a Dielectric Probe Kit and a Network Analyzer (see Appendix C). 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 7 of 35

7.0 SAR SCALING (MANUFACTURER S TUNE-UP TOLERANCE) Not applicable - the DUT was tested at the manufacturer s maximum output power specification inc. tolerance (1.85 W). 8.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES a. (i) The evaluation was performed in the applicable area of the phantom depending on the type of device being tested. For devices held to the ear during normal operation, both the left and right ear positions were evaluated using the SAM phantom. (ii) For body-worn and face-held devices a planar phantom was used. b. The SAR was determined by a pre-defined procedure within the DASY4 software. Upon completion of a reference and optical surface check, the exposed region of the phantom was scanned near the inner surface with a grid spacing of 15mm x 15mm. An area scan was determined as follows: c. Based on the defined area scan grid, a more detailed grid is created to increase the points by a factor of 10. The interpolation function then evaluates all field values between corresponding measurement points. d. A linear search is applied to find all the candidate maxima. Subsequently, all maxima are removed that are >2 db from the global maximum. The remaining maxima are then used to position the cube scans. A 1g and 10g spatial peak SAR was determined as follows: e. Extrapolation is used to find the points between the dipole center of the probe and the surface of the phantom. This data cannot be measured, since the center of the dipoles is 2.7 mm away from the tip of the probe and the distance between the surface and the lowest measuring point is 1.4 mm (see probe calibration document in Appendix F). The extrapolation was based on trivariate quadratics computed from the previously calculated 3D interpolated points nearest the phantom surface. f. Interpolated data is used to calculate the average SAR over 1g and 10g cubes by spatially discretizing the entire measured cube. The volume used to determine the averaged SAR is a 1mm grid (42875 interpolated points). g. A zoom scan volume of 30 mm x 30 mm x 30 mm (5 x 5 x 7 points) centered at the peak SAR location determined from the area scan is used for all zoom scans for devices with a transmit frequency < 800 MHz. Zoom scans for frequencies 800 MHz are determined with a scan volume of 30 mm x 30 mm x 30 mm (7 x 7 x 7) to ensure complete capture of the peak spatial-average SAR. 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 8 of 35

9.0 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK Prior to the SAR evaluations, system checks were performed with the Barski planar phantom and 300 MHz SPEAG dipole (see Appendix B for system check plots) in accordance with the procedures described in IEC 62209-1:2005 (see reference [5]). The dielectric parameters of the simulated tissue mixture were measured prior to the system check using a Dielectric Probe Kit and a Network Analyzer (see Appendix C for measured fluid dielectric parameters). A forward power of 398 mw was applied to the dipole and the system was verified to a tolerance of +10% from the system manufacturer s dipole calibration target SAR value (see Appendix E for system manufacturer s dipole calibration procedures). SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK EVALUATION Test Date Equiv. Tissue Freq. (MHz) SAR 1g (W/kg) Dielectric Constant ε r Conductivity σ (mho/m) Target Meas. Dev. Target Meas. Dev. Target Meas. Dev. ρ (Kg/m 3 ) Amb. Temp. ( C) Fluid Temp. ( C) Fluid Depth (cm) Humid. (%) Barom. Press. (kpa) Jun 6 Head 300 0.760 ±10% 0.826 +8.7% 45.3 ±10% 46.9 +3.5% 0.87 ±10% 0.87 0.0% 1000 22.0 22.0 15 33 101.1 1. The target SAR values are the measured values from the SAR system manufacturer s dipole calibration (see Appendix E). 2. The target dielectric parameters are the nominal values from the SAR system manufacturer s dipole calibration (see Appendix E). Notes 3. 4. The fluid temperature remained within +/-2 C from the dielectric parameter measurement to the completion of the system performance check. The dielectric parameters of the simulated tissue mixture were measured prior to the system performance check using a Dielectric Probe Kit and a Network Analyzer (see Appendix C). System Performance Check Measurement Setup (IEEE Standard 1528-2003) SPEAG 300 MHz Validation Dipole Setup 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 9 of 35

10.0 SIMULATED EQUIVALENT TISSUES The simulated equivalent tissue recipes in the table below are derived from the SAR system manufacturer s suggested recipes in the DASY4 manual (see references [8]). The ingredient percentage may have been adjusted minimally in order to achieve the appropriate target dielectric parameters within the specified tolerance. SIMULATED TISSUE MIXTURES Water 37.56 % 38.35 % INGREDIENT Sugar 300 MHz 55.32 % 150 MHz 55.5% Salt Head Head Tissue 5.95 % Tissue 5.15% HEC Mixture 0.98 % Mixture 0.9% Bactericide 0.19 % 0.1% 11.0 SAR LIMITS BASIC RESTRICTIONS PER ICNIRP GUIDELINES 1998 RF Exposure Environment & EU COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 1999/519/EC ANNEX II General Public Occupational Whole-body average SAR SAR averaged over any 6 minute period 0.08 W/kg 0.4 W/kg Localized SAR - head & trunk (10 g averaging) SAR averaged over any 6 minute period 2.0 W/kg 10.0 W/kg Localized SAR - limbs (10 g averaging) SAR averaged over any 6 minute period 4.0 W/kg 20.0 W/kg General Public environment is defined as potential exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or control of their potential exposure. Occupational environment is defined as potential exposure of individuals who have knowledge of their potential exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 10 of 35

12.0 ROBOT SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS Specifications Positioner Stäubli Unimation Corp. Robot Model: RX60L Repeatability 0.02 mm No. of axis 6 Data Acquisition Electronic (DAE) System Cell Controller Processor AMD Athlon XP 2400+ Clock Speed Operating System Data Converter Features Software Connecting Lines 2.0 GHz Windows XP Professional Signal Amplifier, multiplexer, A/D converter, and control logic Measurement Software: DASY4, V4.7 Build 44 Postprocessing Software: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 171 Optical downlink for data and status info., Optical uplink for commands and clock DASY4 Measurement Server Function Hardware Connections Real-time data evaluation for field measurements and surface detection PC/104 166MHz Pentium CPU; 32 MB chipdisk; 64 MB RAM COM1, COM2, DAE, Robot, Ethernet, Service Interface E-Field Probe Model ET3DV6 Serial No. 1590 Construction Triangular core fiber optic detection system Frequency 10 MHz to 6 GHz Linearity ±0.2 db (30 MHz to 3 GHz) Evaluation Phantom Type Shell Material Bottom Thickness Outer Dimensions Side Planar Phantom Plexiglas 2.0 mm ± 0.1 mm 75.0 cm (L) x 22.5 cm (W) x 20.5 cm (H); Back Plane: 25.7 cm (H) Validation Phantom Type Shell Material Thickness Volume Barski Planar Phantom Fiberglass 2.0 ±0.1 mm Approx. 70 liters 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 11 of 35

13.0 PROBE SPECIFICATION (ET3DV6) Construction: Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in shielding against static charges PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, glycol) Calibration: In air from 10 MHz to 2.5 GHz In Body simulating tissue at frequencies of 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz (accuracy ± 8%) Frequency: 10 MHz to > 6 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 db (30 MHz to 3 GHz) Directivity: ± 0.2 db in Body tissue (rotation around probe axis) ± 0.4 db in Body tissue (rotation normal to probe axis) Dynamic Range: 5 µw/g to > 100 mw/g; Linearity: ± 0.2 db Surface Detect: ± 0.2 mm repeatability in air and clear liquids over diffuse reflecting surfaces Dimensions: Overall length: 330 mm Tip length: 16 mm Body diameter: 12 mm Tip diameter: 6.8 mm Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Application: General dosimetry up to 3 GHz Compliance tests of mobile phone ET3DV6 E-Field Probe 14.0 SIDE PLANAR PHANTOM The side planar phantom is constructed of Plexiglas material with a 2.0 mm shell thickness for face-held and body-worn SAR evaluations of portable radio transceivers. The side planar phantom is mounted on the side of the DASY4 compact system table. Plexiglas Side Planar Phantom 15.0 BARSKI PLANAR PHANTOM The Barski Planar Phantom is a fiberglass shell phantom with a 2.0 mm (+/-0.2mm) thick device measurement area at the center of the phantom for SAR evaluations of devices with a larger surface area than the planar section of the SAM phantom. The planar phantom is integrated in a wooden table. The planar phantom was used for the DUT SAR evaluations and the system performance check evaluations. See Appendix G for dimensions and specifications of the Barski planar phantom. Barski Planar Phantom 16.0 DEVICE HOLDER The DASY4 device holder has two scales for device rotation (with respect to the body axis) and the device inclination (with respect to the line between the ear openings). The plane between the ear openings and the mouth tip has a rotation angle of 65. The bottom plate contains three pair of bolts for locking the device holder. The device holder positions are adjusted to the standard measurement positions in the three sections. Face-held SAR evaluations (PTT radios) are performed with the device holder in the body axis. Device Holder 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 12 of 35

17.0 TEST EQUIPMENT LIST USED TEST EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ASSET NO. SERIAL NO. DATE CALIBRATED CALIBRATION INTERVAL x Schmid & Partner DASY4 System - - - - x -DASY4 Measurement Server 00158 1078 CNR CNR x -Robot 00046 599396-01 CNR CNR x -DAE4 00019 353 27Apr10 Biennial x -ET3DV6 E-Field Probe 00017 1590 15Jul10 Annual x -SPEAG D300V3 Validation Dipole 000216 1009 18Jan10 Triennial x Side Planar Phantom 00156 161 CNR CNR x Barski Planar Phantom 00155 03-01 CNR CNR x HP 85070C Dielectric Probe Kit 00033 none CNR CNR x Gigatronics 8652A Power Meter 00007 1835272 04May10 Biennial x Gigatronics 80701A Power Sensor 00014 1833699 04May10 Biennial x HP 8753ET Network Analyzer 00134 US39170292 04May10 Biennial x Rohde & Schwarz SMR20 Signal Generator 00006 100104 CNR CNR x Amplifier Research 5S1G4 Power Amplifier 00106 26235 CNR CNR Abbr. CNR = Calibration Not Required 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 13 of 35

18.0 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES UNCERTAINTY BUDGET FOR DEVICE EVALUATION Uncertainty Component IEC 62209-1 Section Uncertainty Value ±% Probability Distribution Divisor ci 1g ci 10g Uncertainty Value ±% (1g) Uncertainty Value ±% (10g) V i or V eff Measurement System Probe Calibration (150 MHz) 7.2.1 10.0 Normal 1 1 1 10.0 10.0 Axial Isotropy 7.2.1.2 4.7 Rectangular 1.732050808 0.7 0.7 1.9 1.9 Hemispherical Isotropy 7.2.1.2 9.6 Rectangular 1.732050808 0.7 0.7 3.9 3.9 Boundary Effect 7.2.1.5 2.5 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 1.4 1.4 Linearity 7.2.1.3 4.7 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 2.7 2.7 System Detection Limits 7.2.1.4 1 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 0.6 0.6 Readout Electronics 7.2.1.6 0.3 Normal 1 1 1 0.3 0.3 Response Time 7.2.1.7 0.8 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 0.5 0.5 Integration Time 7.2.1.8 2.6 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 1.5 1.5 RF Ambient Conditions 7.2.3.6 3 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 1.7 1.7 Probe Positioner Mechanical Tolerance 7.2.2.1 0.4 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 0.2 0.2 Probe Positioning wrt Phantom Shell 7.2.2.3 2.9 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 1.7 1.7 Extrapolation, interpolation & integration algorithms for max. SAR evaluation 7.2.4 1 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 0.6 0.6 Test Sample Related Test Sample Positioning 7.2.2.4 2.9 Normal 1 1 1 2.9 2.9 12 Device Holder Uncertainty 7.2.2.4.2 3.6 Normal 1 1 1 3.6 3.6 8 SAR Drift Measurement 7.2.3.5 5 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 2.9 2.9 Phantom and Tissue Parameters Phantom Uncertainty 7.2.2.2 4 Rectangular 1.732050808 1 1 2.3 2.3 Liquid Conductivity (target) 7.2.3.3 5 Rectangular 1.732050808 0.64 0.43 1.8 1.2 Liquid Conductivity (measured) 7.2.3.3 2.63 Normal 1 0.64 0.43 1.7 1.1 Liquid Permittivity (target) 7.2.3.4 5 Rectangular 1.732050808 0.6 0.49 1.7 1.4 Liquid Permittivity (measured) 7.2.3.4 2.87 Normal 1 0.6 0.49 1.7 1.4 Combined Standard Uncertainty RSS 13.58 13.38 Expanded Uncertainty (95% Confidence Interval) k=2 27.16 26.76 Measurement Uncertainty Table in accordance with IEEE Standard 1528-2003 This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 14 of 35

19.0 REFERENCES [1] Council Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18thindividual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/331/EEC). [2] Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work. [3] International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) - Guidelines For Limiting Exposure to Time- Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz) : 1998. [4] EN 62311:2008 - Assessment of electronic and electrical equipment related to human exposure restrictions for electromagnetic fields (0 Hz - 300 GHz). [5] International Standard IEC 62209-1:2005 - Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and bodymounted wireless communication devices - Human models, instrumentation, and procedures - Part 1: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for hand-held devices used in close proximity to the ear (frequency range of 300 MHz to 3 GHz). [6] International Standard IEC 62209-2 Edition 1.0 2010-03 - Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held & body-mounted wireless communication devices - Part 2: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz). [7] Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology - Mobile and Portable Device RF Exposure Procedures and Equipment Authorization Policies ; KDB 447498 D01v04: November 2009. [8] Schmid & Partner Engineering AG - DASY4 Manual V4.6, Chapter 16 Application Note, Head Tissue Recipe: Sept. 2005. [9] International Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005 - General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 15 of 35

APPENDIX A - SAR MEASUREMENT DATA 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 16 of 35

Date Tested: 06/06/2011 Face-held SAR - Channel 16-156.8 MHz DUT: Nautilus Lifeline DIVER; Type: Portable VHF PTT Marine Radio Transceiver; Serial: 030 (Identical Prototype) Ambient Temp: 22.0 C; Fluid Temp: 22.0 C; Barometric Pressure: 101.1 kpa; Humidity: 33% Communication System: VHF CW Frequency: 157 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: HSL150 Medium parameters used (interpolated): f = 157 MHz; σ = 0.78 mho/m; ε r = 53.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 - Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1590; ConvF(8.5, 8.5, 8.5); Calibrated: 15/07/2010 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection - Electronics: DAE4 Sn353; Calibrated: 27/04/2010 - Phantom: Side Planar; Type: Plexiglas; Serial: 161 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 44; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 171 Face-held SAR - 2.5 cm Separation Distance from Front Side of DUT to Planar Phantom Face SAR/Area Scan (6x11x1): Measurement grid: dx=20mm, dy=20mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.309 mw/g Face SAR/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=7.5mm, dy=7.5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 19.0 V/m; Power Drift = -0.398 db Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.400 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.267 mw/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.198 mw/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.281 mw/g 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 17 of 35

Z-Axis Scan 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 18 of 35

APPENDIX B - SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK DATA 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 19 of 35

Date Tested: 06/06/2011 System Performance Check - 300 MHz Dipole - Head DUT: Dipole D300V3; Asset: 000216; Serial: 1009; Calibration: 01/18/2010 Ambient Temp: 22.0 C; Fluid Temp: 22.0 C; Barometric Pressure: 101.1 kpa; Humidity: 33% Communication System: CW Frequency: 300 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 300 HSL Medium parameters used: f = 300 MHz; σ = 0.87 mho/m; ε r = 46.9; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 - Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1590; ConvF(7.7, 7.7, 7.7); Calibrated: 15/07/2010 - Sensor-Surface: 5mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 Sn353; Calibrated: 27/04/2010 - Phantom: Barski Industries; Type: Fiberglas Planar; Serial: 03-01 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 44; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 171 Head/d=15mm, Pin = 398mW/Area Scan (6x11x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.18 mw/g Head/d=15mm, Pin = 398mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 36.8 V/m; Power Drift = -0.101 db Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 2.00 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 1.25 mw/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.826 mw/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.20 mw/g 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 20 of 35

Z-Axis Scan 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 21 of 35

APPENDIX C - MEASURED FLUID DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 22 of 35

300 MHz System Performance Check (Head) ************************************************************ Celltech Labs Test Result for UIM Dielectric Parameter 06/Jun/2011 Frequency (GHz) FCC_eH FCC OET 65 Supplement C (June 2001) Limits for Head Epsilon FCC_sH FCC OET 65 Supplement C (June 2001) Limits for Head Sigma Test_e Epsilon of UIM Test_s Sigma of UIM ************************************************************ Freq FCC_eH FCC_sH Test_e Test_s 0.2000 49.97 0.80 52.23 0.78 0.2100 49.50 0.80 50.89 0.79 0.2200 49.03 0.81 50.46 0.79 0.2300 48.57 0.82 49.60 0.81 0.2400 48.10 0.83 49.60 0.81 0.2500 47.63 0.83 48.62 0.81 0.2600 47.17 0.84 48.11 0.83 0.2700 46.70 0.85 48.30 0.84 0.2800 46.23 0.86 47.59 0.83 0.2900 45.77 0.86 47.80 0.85 0.3000 45.30 0.87 46.94 0.87 0.3100 45.18 0.87 46.39 0.87 0.3200 45.06 0.87 47.11 0.89 0.3300 44.94 0.87 45.76 0.90 0.3400 44.82 0.87 45.53 0.90 0.3500 44.70 0.87 45.73 0.89 0.3600 44.58 0.87 45.00 0.92 0.3700 44.46 0.87 44.59 0.91 0.3800 44.34 0.87 44.30 0.92 0.3900 44.22 0.87 43.50 0.94 0.4000 44.10 0.87 43.87 0.95 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 23 of 35

150 MHz DUT Evaluation (Head) ************************************************************ Celltech Labs Test Result for UIM Dielectric Parameter 06/Jun/2011 Frequency (GHz) FCC_eH FCC OET 65 Supplement C (June 2001) Limits for Head Epsilon FCC_sH FCC OET 65 Supplement C (June 2001) Limits for Head Sigma Test_e Epsilon of UIM Test_s Sigma of UIM ************************************************************ Freq FCC_eH FCC_sH Test_e Test_s 0.0500 56.97 0.69 83.82 0.67 0.0600 56.50 0.69 71.16 0.68 0.0700 56.03 0.70 66.32 0.71 0.0800 55.57 0.71 65.43 0.72 0.0900 55.10 0.72 61.72 0.70 0.1000 54.63 0.72 57.48 0.74 0.1100 54.17 0.73 61.94 0.72 0.1200 53.70 0.74 58.94 0.74 0.1300 53.23 0.75 57.23 0.74 0.1400 52.77 0.75 59.86 0.78 0.1500 52.30 0.76 55.11 0.78 0.1600 51.83 0.77 53.24 0.78 0.1700 51.37 0.77 53.90 0.77 0.1800 50.90 0.78 53.30 0.79 0.1900 50.43 0.79 54.94 0.81 0.2000 49.97 0.80 51.46 0.80 0.2100 49.50 0.80 50.93 0.81 0.2200 49.03 0.81 51.71 0.83 0.2300 48.57 0.82 49.98 0.85 0.2400 48.10 0.83 51.34 0.86 0.2500 47.63 0.83 49.19 0.86 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 24 of 35

APPENDIX D - SAR TEST SETUP & DUT PHOTOGRAPHS 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 25 of 35

FACE-HELD SAR TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS Face-held Configuration - DUT with 2.5 cm spacing from front display side to planar phantom 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 26 of 35

FACE-HELD SAR TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS 2.5 cm 6.2 cm 6.0 cm Face-held Configuration DUT and Antenna Distance to planar phantom 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 27 of 35

DUT PHOTOGRAPHS Front Side of DUT 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 28 of 35

DUT PHOTOGRAPHS Back Side of DUT 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 29 of 35

DUT PHOTOGRAPHS Bottom end of DUT Top end of DUT Top end of DUT (antenna removed) Antenna 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 30 of 35

DUT PHOTOGRAPHS Side of DUT Side of DUT 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 31 of 35

DUT PHOTOGRAPHS Front of Battery Pack Back of Battery Pack 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 32 of 35

APPENDIX E - DIPOLE CALIBRATION 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 33 of 35

APPENDIX F - PROBE CALIBRATION 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 34 of 35

APPENDIX G - BARSKI PHANTOM CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY 2011 Celltech Labs Inc. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written permission of Celltech Labs Inc. Page 35 of 35

Fiberglass Planar Phantom - Top View Fiberglass Planar Phantom - Front View Fiberglass Planar Phantom - Back View 2003 Celltech Labs Inc. Fiberglass Planar Phantom - Bottom View

Dimensions of Fiberglass Planar Phantom (Manufactured by Barski Industries Ltd. - Unit# 03-01) 29 mm Top View 5 mm 355 mm 45 mm 2mm-thick device measurement area is centered from left to right and 12 mm from inside front edge. 285 mm 380 mm 438 mm 12 mm 940 mm Spigot Front View 25 mm 5 mm 216 mm 850 mm 5.0mm Spigot *2.0mm+/-0.2mm Note: Measurements that aren t repeated for the opposite sides are the same as the side measured. This drawing is not to scale. 2003 Celltech Labs Inc.