Theories of International Relations POLM013 View Online [1]Baylis J., Smith S., and Owens P., Eds., The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014. [2]Mingst K. A. and Snyder J. L., Eds., Essential readings in world politics, vol. The Norton series in world politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2014. [3]Weber C., International relations theory: a critical introduction. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=544463&entityid=https://oala.surrey.ac.uk/oala/metadata [4]Smith S., Booth K., and Zalewski M., International theory: positivism and beyond. [5]Smith S., Booth K., and Zalewski M., International theory: positivism and beyond. [6]Dunne T., Kurki M., and Smith S., International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. [7]Rathbun B., A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism, Security Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 294 321, May 2008. [8] Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy, World Politics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 144 172, Jan. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/world_politics/v051/51.1er_brown.html [9]Lobell S. E., Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://oala.surrey.ac.uk/ oala/metadata&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/abstract View/S9780511476174 [10]Knutsen T. L., A history of international relations theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997. [11]Michael W. Doyle, Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205 235, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298 [12]Gilmore J., Protecting the Other: Considering the process and practice of cosmopolitanism, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 694 719, Sep. 2014. [13]Nicholas J. Wheeler and Timothy Dunne, Hedley Bull s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 91 107, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624751 [14]LITTLE R., The English School s Contribution to the Study of International Relations, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 395 422, Sep. 2000. [15]Hall I., Still the English patient? Closures and inventions in the English school, 1/5
International Affairs, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 931 942, Oct. 2001. [16]Buzan B. and Little R., The English patient strikes back: a response to Hall s mis-diagnosis, International Affairs, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 943 946, Oct. 2001. [17]RENGGER N. and THIRKELL-WHITE B., Still critical after all these years? The past, present and future of Critical Theory in International Relations, Review of International Studies, vol. 33, no. S1, Apr. 2007. [18]Hoffman, Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate, Millenium, vol. 16, pp. 231 250, 1987 [Online]. Available: http://mil.sagepub.com/content/16/2/231.full.pdf [19]Linklater, The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory, Millenium, vol. 21, pp. 7 98, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://mil.sagepub.com/content/21/1/77.full.pdf [20]ADLER E., Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 319 363, Sep. 1997. [21]Roxanne Lynn Doty, Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 297 320, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600810 [22]Weldes J., Constructing national interests, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 275 318, 1996. [23]Dunne T., Kurki M., and Smith S., International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. [24]Edkins J., Poststructuralism & international relations: bringing the political back in, vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999. [25]Acharya Amitav, Non-Western international relations theory : perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/?id=297445&entityid=https://oala.surrey.ac.uk/oala/metadata [26]Barkawi T., Empire and Order in International Relations and Security Studies, The International Studies Encyclopaedia, vol. 3, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.academia.edu/348812/empire_and_order_in_international_relations_and_secu rity_studies [27]Barkawi T. and Laffey M., Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 109 127, Jan. 2002. [28]International relations theory for the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Routledge, 2007. [29]Tickner J. A., You Just Don t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 611 632, Dec. 1997. [30]Robert O. Keohane, Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations between International Relations and Feminist Theory, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 193 197, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600824 [31]Dunne T., Hansen L., and Wight C., The end of International Relations theory?, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 405 425, Sep. 2013. [32]Weber C., International relations theory: a critical introduction. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=544463&entityid=https://oala.surrey.ac.uk/oala/metadata [33]Smith S., Booth K., and Zalewski M., International theory: positivism and beyond. [34]Smith S., Booth K., and Zalewski M., International theory: positivism and beyond. 2/5
[35]Dunne T., Kurki M., and Smith S., International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. [36]Waltz K. N., Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1979. [37]Stephen M. Walt, Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power, International Security, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3 43, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2538540 [38]Knutsen T. L., A history of international relations theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997. [39]Michael W. Doyle, Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205 235, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298 [40]Gilmore J., Protecting the Other: Considering the process and practice of cosmopolitanism, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 694 719, Sep. 2014. [41]Nicholas J. Wheeler and Timothy Dunne, Hedley Bull s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 91 107, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624751 [42]LITTLE R., The English School s Contribution to the Study of International Relations, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 395 422, Sep. 2000. [43]Hall I., Still the English patient? Closures and inventions in the English school, International Affairs, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 931 942, Oct. 2001. [44]Review by: Barry Buzan and Richard Little, The English Patient Strikes Back: A Response to Hall s Mis-Diagnosis, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 943 946, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3095603?origin=api [45]Booth K., Security and emancipation, Review of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 04, Oct. 1991. [46]Neufeld M., Pitfalls of Emancipation and Discourses of Security: Reflections on Canada s Security with a Human Face, International Relations, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 109 123, Mar. 2004. [47]Williams P., Security studies: an introduction. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013. [48]ADLER E., Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 319 363, Sep. 1997. [49]Roxanne Lynn Doty, Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 297 320, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2600810?origin=api [50]Fierke K. M., Critical approaches to international security. Cambridge: Polity, 2007. [51]WELDES J., Constructing National Interests, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 275 318, Sep. 1996. [52]Edkins J., Poststructuralism & international relations: bringing the political back in, vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999. [53]Dunne T., Kurki M., and Smith S., International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. [54] Empire and Order in International Relations and Security Studies Tarak Barkawi - Academia.edu. [Online]. Available: 3/5
http://www.academia.edu/348812/empire_and_order_in_international_relations_and_secu rity_studies [55]Barkawi T. and Laffey M., Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 109 127, Jan. 2002. [56]International relations theory for the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Routledge, 2007. [57]Acharya Amitav, Non-Western international relations theory : perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2010. [58]Keohane R. O., Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 193 197, Mar. 1998. [59]Tickner J. A., You Just Don t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 611 632, Dec. 1997. [60]Dunne T., Hansen L., and Wight C., The end of International Relations theory?, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 405 425, Sep. 2013. [61] Review of International Studies. [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayjournal?jid=ris [62] International Organization. [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayjournal?jid=ino [63] International Studies Review. [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(issn)1468-2486 [64] International Affairs. [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(issn)1468-2346 [65] International Studies Perspectives. [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(issn)1528-3585 [66] Project MUSE - International Security. [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/ [67] Publications: Foreign Affairs: EBSCOhost. [Online]. Available: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/command/detail?sid=205d4ba0-cead-4718-b85c-231f5e 5ccfcc%40sessionmgr4005&vid=0&hid=4112&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHNoaWImc2l0Z T1laG9zdC1saXZl#db=bth&jid=FAF [68] Taylor & Francis Online :: Security Studies. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fsst20#.vbbj5vldwfi [69] World Politics. [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/api/version1/sf?shr=t&sfi=gb00nbgensrch&csi=3623 &secondredirectindicator=true [70] Taylor & Francis Online :: Critical Studies on Terrorism. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rter20#.vbblhfldwfi [71] Taylor & Francis Online :: Geopolitics. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fgeo20#.vbbmrfldwfi [72] Environment and Planning D: Society and Space volumes. [Online]. Available: http://www.envplan.com/allvols.cgi?journal=d [73] Security Dialogue. [Online]. Available: http://sdi.sagepub.com/ [74] Millennium - Journal of International Studies. [Online]. Available: http://mil.sagepub.com/ [75] International Political Sociology. [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(issn)1749-5687 [76] Alternatives, vol. 0002 6638, no. 0002 6638. 2AD [Online]. Available: http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?issn=0002-6638&v=2.1&u=surrey&it=jiourl&p=aone&sw 4/5
=w [77] b o r d e r l a n d s e-journal home page. [Online]. Available: http://www.borderlands.net.au/index.html [78] Politics - University of Surrey - Guildford. [Online]. Available: http://www.surrey.ac.uk/library/subject/mysubject/politics/politics.htm 5/5