Supplementary Education Centers/Programs Overview Webinar



Similar documents
ACS WASC BYLAWS AND POLICY MANUAL

Accrediting Commission for Schools, WASC Accreditation Process Overview

Review Process for University Departments and Academic Partnerships

Accrediting Commission for Schools Western Association of Schools and Colleges WASC Postsecondary Supplement to the COE/WASC Self-Study Report

Higher Education Accreditation: A Primer

Evaluation Reminders. For Team Chairs Evaluators, Financial Reviewers, And Generalists Institutions being Reviewed

Master Scheduling for Inclusive Practices Voices Over

Senate Policy on the Review of Undergraduate Programs at Saint Mary's University Policy Number: University Senate Approved: March 12, 2010

National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment. Handbook for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia PART 3

WASC Supplement for Schools with Online Learning as the Primary Delivery System

Demonstrating Institutional Quality through Academic Accreditation

Board of Commissioners

DESIGNING OUR FUTURE

BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION COMMUNICATIONS PLAN

The University of North Texas at Dallas Policy Manual

Implementing the ASCA National Model. Patti Livingstone, M.S., LMFT Ramona Griffin, Ed.D. Corey Anderson, M.Ed., NBCT

ABET - Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Mapped to NSSE Survey Questions

Founded Standards and Indicators for the Accreditation of Online Academies

Strategic Plan San Luis Obispo County Community College District

TABLE OF CONTENTS. The Concept of School Accreditation: Objectives of School Accreditation:... 4

Assessment PLANS. An effective assessment plan includes several important characteristics:

Town Hall Meeting #2 - Middle States Commission on Higher Education

Curriculum, Instruction, and Professional Development EDS

Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3, 2011, May 7, 2013

Weber State University Information Technology

District Accreditation as a Quality System

CHAPTER 42. PROGRAM APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS SPECIALIZED ASSOCIATE DEGREE PROGRAMS APPROVAL PROCEDURE

Learning and Development Hiring Manager Guide For Onboarding A New Manager

BEST PRACTICES FROM EXPERIENCED EDUCATORS. 25 TIPS FOR BLENDED LEARNING SUCCESS When Implementing a Program to Personalize Education

PART Ed 512 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND RECERTIFICATION

How To Improve A School

The process described below is specific to an institution seeking reaffirmation of accreditation. Preparation by the Institution

Internal Quality Assurance Arrangements

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar Standards Review Committee. Definitions Section Explanation of Changes

Preparing an Application for a Degree Program

9. The ad hoc joint committee drafts a formal program implementation proposal. (See Attachment B for a description of the contents of this document.

QUALITY ASSURANCE COUNCIL AUDIT MANUAL SECOND AUDIT CYCLE

HTSB Form RA 5010 C License Renewal Rev. 1/2015

PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS AUDIT 18-MONTH FOLLOW- UP REPORT FANSHAWE COLLEGE

Increasing Student Success through Quality Assurance by Kristina Kauffman and Andy Howard

Academic Unit Action Plan: SOCIAL WORK

Florida Department of Education Commission for Independent Education

AMC DIRECTORS REPORT THE MELBOURNE MEDICAL SCHOOL, FACULTY OF MEDICINE, DENTISTRY AND HEALTH SCIENCES, THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction to NYCDOE s New Teacher Evaluation and Development System

South Windsor High School Guidance Department

SACSCASI. August 21-22, Joe Smith, Principal, Sample School Mary Anderson, Chairperson, SAIS - SACS Team

Idaho State University Strategic Plan. Mapping Our Future: Leading in Opportunity and Innovation Executive Summary

Course Outline Routine Review Process and Procedures

Per Academic Year. Spring 2008

CSHSE Accreditation A Challenge Worth the Effort!

Alabama Profile of State High School Exit Exam Policies

NEW GRADUATE DEGREE PRELIMINARY REVIEW AND PROPOSAL OUTLINE

Community College of Philadelphia Administrative Function and Support Service Audit Learning Lab Executive Summary

Preparing the Self-Study Report for Engineering

Undergraduate Degree Map for Completion in Four Years

Policies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process DRAFT

Professional School Counselor Effectiveness Rubric 2012

AACSB Self Evaluation Report Documentation. Supporting Materials and Timeline

Dr. Eduardo M. Ochoa. Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education United States Department of Education

Transcription:

Accrediting Commission for Schools Western Association of Schools and Colleges Supplementary Education Centers/Programs Overview Webinar Dr. Lee Duncan Associate Executive Director, ACS WASC lduncan@acswasc.org

Three Divisions of WASC Accrediting Commission for Schools (K-12) Public Charter Private Religious Online Postsecondary Supplementary College-Level Accrediting Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges 2

Webinar Agenda 1. Overview of WASC accreditation process for Supplementary Education Programs (SEPs) 2. Explanation of accreditation status 3. Tips for preparing an excellent written Self-Study Report 4. Tips for hosting a successful site visit 5. Question & Answer Session 3

Two Kinds of SEPs Corporate: National organizations (i.e., Huntington Learning Centers, Sylvan Learning Centers) Non-Corporate: Local, independent centers (i.e., language centers, math or academic support centers) 4

SEP Accreditation Manual 1. How to start the accreditation process 2. The seven standards of accreditation 3. The Self-Study Report 5 Community Profile Relationships Educational Services Organization for Student Learning Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment 4. The Action Plan

Three Components in the Accreditation Process 1. School Self-Evaluation * results in a written Self-Study Report 2. Peer Review * results in a site visit by outside educators and a written Visiting Committee Report 3. Ongoing School Improvement * results in a Center Action Plan 6

The Players 1. Owner or Franchise Director 2. Center Leadership 3. Faculty and Staff 4. Visiting Committee 5. WASC Commission Each has a role to play! 7

The Documents Self Study Report Center Action Plan Visiting Committee Report, Documentation & Justification Statement 8

WASC Expectations Self-Study Report every six years Host a site visit at least once every six years (3 rd year mid-cycle visit is common) Analyze learning data draw conclusions Review and revise Action Plan each year and develop an accountability process to ensure progress Involve all stakeholders 9

WASC Accreditation Status The focus is on the six-year process, not a one-time event There is now a probation status for SEPs that are not making progress It provides a plan for ongoing Center improvement 10

Status Options Six-year status with mid-cycle progress report Six-year status with one-day mid-cycle visit Six-year status with two-day mid-cycle visit Probation status Accreditation withheld Questions? 11

Where are you in the Accreditation Timeline? Fall Visits Self-Study Report completed Everyone should read the Self-Study Report Finalize logistics of your visit 12

Where are you in the Accreditation Timeline? (cont.) Spring Visits Collect input to form Draft #1. Send the draft to the Chair for his/her input. Begin planning site visit schedule; find out needs for accommodations, food, and workroom space. Meet weekly with those who are doing the final editing of the Self-Study Report. Begin to prepare the teachers and staff for their roles and duties during the site visit. Revise the School Action Plan using the conclusions reached as a result of the self-study process. 13

How to Write an Excellent Report 1. Attractive and professional presentation 2. Step back and read draft #1, asking important questions: Did you answer the question? Are your answers concise? Are you only describing what you do or are you giving your evaluation of what you do? Do you draw conclusions? Does your Action Plan align with your conclusions? 14

Writing an Excellent Report (cont.) 3. Report should be collaborative 4. Be honest and transparent 5. Do not use individual s names in the report 6. Cite evidence where appropriate back up what you affirm with examples, reports, assessments, etc. 7. In Action Plan, use the who, what, why format Who is responsible for this task? What do you want him/her/group specifically to do? Why is this task important what is the intended result? 15

Example of an Area of Needed Improvement (written in the who, what, why format) The principal and teachers should develop a clear assessment process so that student learning data can be gathered and analyzed, resulting in conclusions that will be used to improve the learning program for all students. 16

Tips on Hosting a Successful Visit 1. Communicate often with the Chair 2. Have all stakeholders read the Self-Study Report 3. Prepare a well-defined schedule 4. Set up a comfortable work area 5. Check out of the hotel 17

Tips on Hosting a Successful Visit (cont.) 6. Teach your staff what the Visiting Committee will be doing: Validate your Self-Study Report Watch classes or tutoring (not evaluating teachers) Observations for their written report Group discussions Write their own written report to WASC 7. Plan for all the logistics 8. Make the team feel wanted and appreciated 18

The Overarching Purpose of the Site Visit To validate your Self-Study Report To affirm your Action Plan 19

Question and Answer Thank you for joining us today; contact me if I can be of further help to you in any way! Lee Duncan lduncan@acswasc.org 20