Department of Rehabilitation



Similar documents
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT ON THE PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY

Napa County, California, Needs Additional Technical Assistance and Monitoring to Ensure Compliance with Federal Regulations

U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL WASHINGTON, D.C

NOT ALL COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT RECOVERY ACT COSTS CLAIMED

Nelson R. Bregon, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development. James D. McKay Regional Inspector General for Audit, 4AGA

FEMA Should Disallow over $4 Million Awarded to Mountain View Electric Association, Colorado, for Improper Procurement Practices

U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL WASHINGTON, D.C

Section 3.16 Comprehensive Community Services (CCS) 2012

CENTERS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING COMPLIANCE REVIEW REPORT

Audit Report. Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Agency

AUDIT OF THE MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE EQUITABLE SHARING PROGRAM ACTIVITIES MOUNT CLEMENS, MICHIGAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY*

MATERNAL AND CHILD SERVICES BLOCK GRANT TO THE STATES

Gwinnett County, Georgia, Generally Accounted for and Expended FEMA Public Assistance Grant Funds According to Federal Requirements

1/ff~. Schanz Inspector General. March 26, 2015

Audit of Creighton University s Administration of Its Federal TRIO Projects

Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds ARRA Program Audit

Office of Inspector General Audit Report

Christian Reformed Church Loan Fund, Inc. U.S.

New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services

REHABILITATION SERVICES VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION GRANTS TO STATES, RECOVERY ACT

COSTS CHARGED TO HEAD START PROGRAM ADMINISTERED BY ROCKINGHAM COMMUNITY ACTION,

Violence Against Women Formula Grants

TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION

BARRIO COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC., DID NOT ALWAYS FOLLOW FEDERAL REGULATIONS

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. July 13, 2015

Checks and Balances Internal Controls. West Virginia State Auditor s Office Chief Inspector Division

May 2011 Report No An Audit Report on Substance Abuse Program Contract Monitoring at the Department of State Health Services

Charter Township of Shelby Macomb County, Michigan. Federal Awards Supplemental Information December 31, 2010

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION 2015 STATE PLAN. October 1, 2014 September 30, 2015

Montgomery County, Unique Aspects of the Medicaid Control System

February 18, 2016 OIG D

Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts - Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery B-29 1 of 6

PROFESSIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: PROGRAM GUIDELINES

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections

Department of Homeland Security

OAIG-AUD (ATTN: AFTS Audit Suggestions) Inspector General, Department of Defense 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA

May 22, Report Number: A

MEMORANDUM FOR: K.J. Brockington, Director, Los Angeles Office of Public Housing, 9DPH

State Law 108A N. C. Department of Health and Human Services Division of Social Services

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND

DIXON MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOL FISCAL CONTROL POLICY

JUl ' Review ofmedicaid Claims Made by Freestanding Residential Treatment Facilities in New York State (A )

("t>".4:.. ~.,~f- ;\~Uf.~ APR San Francisco, CA Report Number: A

The City of New York, Office of Management and Budget, New York, NY

QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW REPORT

Is Your Organization Healthy? : (Payroll and Timesheets) June 19, 2012 Marissa M. Tirona Senior Project Director

City of Union, Missouri Request for Proposal Audit Services

1.5 The state legally may carry out each provision of the State Plan and its supplement.yes

SPONSORING ORGANIZATION OF CENTERS

AUG ctor General. State of California: Review of Public Health Preparedness and Response for Bioterrorism Program Funds (A )

Maryland Health Insurance Plan

DCAA Guidelines. How the SBIR firm can work effectively with the Defense Contract Audit Agency

Audit of Controls over Government Travel Cards FINAL AUDIT REPORT

Audit of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services Grants Awarded to Polk County, Florida

State of Georgia Commercial Revitalization Deduction Program Qualified Allocation Plan for Calendar Year 2006

Rehabilitation Services CSA Attachment D

WESTERN NEVADA COLLEGE GRANTS AND CONTRACTS Internal Audit Report July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011

Lawrence County Engineer, Ohio, Generally Accounted For and Expended FEMA Grant Funds Properly

AUDIT REPORT THE ADMINISTRATION OF CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS FOR LINGUISTIC SERVICES BY THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AUGUST

JUt vengriy-- Review offederal Medicaid Claims Made by Inpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in New Jersey (A )

Audit of Controls Over Contract Payments FINAL AUDIT REPORT

State Plan for the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program and State Plan Supplement for the State Supported Employment Services Program

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR FORECLOSURE PREVENTION OUTREACH EVENTS. Issued by: CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Housing, Human & Veteran Services

Connect for Health Colorado Certified Application Counselor Program Announcement and Designated Organization Application Guidelines

Role of the Auditor in Strengthening Business Practices

February 13, FEMA's Mississippi Tr7i7J;Oi?~ C. David Kimble, Director Eastern Regional Office

Coverage of Interpreter and Translation Services for Fee-For-Service Medicaid Recipients Progress Report

Audit Quality Assurance Policies. Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector. Financial Reporting and Audits Division. Audit Unit

October 2007 Report No An Audit Report on The Medical Transportation Program at the Texas Department of Transportation

SAMPLE FINANCIAL PROCEDURES MANUAL

Presentation to the 2015 Health and Human Services Joint Appropriation Subcommittee

OREGON DID NOT BILL MANUFACTURERS FOR REBATES FOR PHYSICIAN-ADMINISTERED DRUGS DISPENSED TO ENROLLEES OF MEDICAID MANAGED-CARE ORGANIZATIONS

Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro-North Railroad

perform cost settlements to ensure that future final payments for school-based services are based on actual costs.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

State Plan for Independent Living (SPIL) FFY

CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION FINANCIAL ANALYST

SUFFFOLK COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER ACCOUNTING SERVICES DIVISION. Joseph Sawicki, Jr. Comptroller

United States Department of Agriculture Office of Inspector General

AUDIT OF AGENCY CONTROLS GOVERNING THE PROCESS FOR PROCUREMENT OF VENDOR TRAINING SERVICES

AUDIT OF CAPITAL CITY TRADE AND TECHNICAL SCHOOL, INC. COMPLIANCE WITH THE 85 PERCENT RULE

MEDICARE INAPPROPRIATELY PAID HOSPITALS INPATIENT CLAIMS SUBJECT TO THE POSTACUTE CARE TRANSFER POLICY

General Overview of Financial Management

U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General

THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA DID NOT ALWAYS CLAIM COSTS

United States Department of Agriculture Office of Inspector General

Assistant Director of Alcohol, Drug, and Mental Health Services Clinical Operations Job Bulletin #

Review: 4424 Statewide Single Audit Year Ended June 30, 2013 Illinois Department of Transportation. FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Repeated 12

COLORADO CLAIMED UNALLOWABLE MEDICAID INPATIENT SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENTS

CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MA THE CDBG-R SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

Review of Audits Issued by the Defense Contract Audit Agency in FY 2012 and FY 2013

Department of Rehabilitation Electronic Records System

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

MICHIGAN AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, C.P.A. AUDITOR GENERAL

Arkansas Department of Career Education Arkansas Rehabilitation Services Division

Division of Aging and Adult Services. Plan for Monitoring Subrecipients

Office of Audits Office of Inspector General U.S. General Services Administration

MICHIGAN AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, C.P.A. AUDITOR GENERAL

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. FEMA Public Assistance Funds Awarded to the Mississippi Emergency Management Agency

Transcription:

Department of Rehabilitation Audit Services Report Older Individuals who are Blind (OIB) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Grant #27670A for San Diego Center for the Blind Date: September 20, 2011 Control Number: 2010A - 114 Audit Team Staff: Rachel Lanoza, Auditor Kerry Gantt, Audit Chief 1

INTRODUCTION The Department of Rehabilitation (DOR) Audit Services Section has completed our desk audit of the Title VII, Chapter 2 Older Individuals who are Blind (OIB) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Grant #27670A for San Diego Center for the Blind (SDCB). The OIB ARRA Grant budgeted for $100,000.00 is effective December 1, 2009 through September 30, 2011. San Diego Center for the Blind's mission is to rehabilitate blind and vision-impaired adults to reach their highest level of independence and self-reliance. They provide services to vision impaired adults in the 4,260 square miles of San Diego County. The center has two permanent sites to serve the community, the primary site is located in San Diego and the other site is located in Vista to accommodate the northern part of the county. Over 75% of the clients served are fifty-five (55+) years of age or older. Through the ongoing analysis utilizing case management, pre and post testing, short and long-term follow-up SDCB is able to assess program effectiveness by evaluating whether the OIB consumer is able to continue major life activities such as cooking and preparing meals, safe travel in the home and community at large, handling personal finances, effective use of technology and alternative forms of communication. The purpose of the OIB ARRA Grant is to increase outreach efforts and it is expected that there will be an increase in the number of OIB being referred to and provided core services at either of their sites in San Diego or Vista. Additional outreach will also be able to provide core services in the field for those not able to attend in-house training and counseling. The following goals and objectives will impact both locations thus benefiting the entre county: Goal #1 - Improve Program Performance by developing and implementing an accessible SDCB website that is online by the end of year one. Goal #2 - Increase and enhance development for OIB staff by funding continuing education for professional staff in order to maintain licensure, certifications and professional growth. Goal #3 - Improve infrastructure through the purchase of assistive technology for staff and clients. Goal #4 - Increase capacity through expansion of existing outreach services. Goal #5 - Hire staff to track and document what is accomplished under ARRA. 2

SCOPE Audit fieldwork was conducted during April 2011 - June 2011. We conducted our audit in accordance with Government Auditing Standards as defined by the Government Accountability Office except Standard 3.52 requiring an external peer review. These standards require that we obtain reasonable assurance that the services provided and expenditures incurred are supported by appropriate records; and are in compliance with the Grant and applicable State and Federal laws and regulations including Title 2 CFR Part 230 and Title 2CFR Part 215. Our audit is subject to the inherent risk that material errors and irregularities, including fraud, if they exist, will not be detected. Our audit included examining, on a sample basis, evidence supporting the information included on the Budget and Reimbursement Requests (BRR) submitted to DOR. Our audit also included a limited review of the internal controls as they relate directly to our audit of the BRR through use of an accounting system/internal control questionnaire. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We found that the expenditures incurred were supported by appropriate records; and were in compliance with the Grant and applicable State and Federal laws and regulations except for the issues identified in Attachment A. SDCB RESPONSE TO THE AUDIT SDCB did not respond to the draft audit report that was sent to them July 29, 2011. Since no response was received we believe SDCB concurs with the audit findings in this report. We would like to thank San Diego Center for the Blind staff for their assistance with our audit. 3

ATTACHMENT A GRANT PROVISION COMPLIANCE 1. SDCB did not have certifications for two of their staff verifying completion of the DOR ARRA Fraud Training required by the grant. SDCB stated that although one of their employees attended the ARRA training they were not aware whether she shared this information with all staff related to the grant. Standard Grant #27670A, ARRA Agreements-Subvention, Supplemental terms and conditions for contracts using ARRA funds 11. Fraud Training: states the Contractor, its employees or any individuals performing activities related to this contract shall certify completion of DOR ARRA Fraud Training no later than 30 days upon contract award. SDCB shall ensure grant requirements are met. OPERATING EXPENSE 2. SDCB invoiced DOR for website development costs which SDCB paid in full in January 2010 and to date this website development has not been completed. Grant #27670A stipulated that SDCB was to develop and implement an accessible website that is online by the end of year one, December 8, 2010. They did not meet the due date specified nor has anything substantial been provided to support the website development up to this point. SDCB assure the final website enhancement project is completed as soon as possible. SDCB shall immediately notify DOR OIB ARRA staff, if the website enhancement will not be completed as was required in the grant. ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS/FUNDING 3. SDCB does not have a written cost allocation plan that identifies an appropriate, reasonable allocation methodology and allocation base for each item of cost for both direct and indirect expenses. SDCB indicated that they were not aware that they were required to have a cost allocation plan. By not having a cost allocation plan there is no assurance that direct and indirect expense allocations are reasonable and consistently applied across various funding sources and general administration. 2CFR Part 230 Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations establishes the principles for determining the costs of grants, contracts and other agreements with the federal government. It contains the following definitions: 4

A. Allocable cost. A cost is allocable to a particular cost objective, such as a grant, in accordance with the relative benefits received. B. Direct costs are those that can be identified specifically with a particular final cost objective, i.e., a particular award, project, service, or other direct activity of an organization. C. Indirect costs are those that have been incurred for common/joint objectives. 2CFR Part 215.21 requires that the recipient's financial management system shall have written procedures for determining the reasonableness, allocability and allowability of costs in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the award. SDCB shall develop a cost allocation plan that identifies a methodology for allocating direct/indirect expenses that measures the benefits to each funding source and is consistent with federal regulations. 5