Modeling the Enrollment Forecasts for PG&E s Non-Residential DR Programs 2010-2020



Similar documents
PG&E Demand Response Programs SVLG DR Workshop December 10, Peter Chan Pacific Gas and Electric

Quantile Regression for Peak Demand Forecasting

Overview of Rooftop Solar PV Green Bank Financing Model

International Experience in Pipeline Capacity Trading

Demand Response CPUC Filing San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved.

Secondary and short term natural gas markets International experiences

NOTIFICATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY S REQUEST TO INCREASE RATES FOR THE 2016 GENERAL RATE CASE (GRC)

Managing Electrical Demand through Difficult Periods: California s Experience with Demand Response

Independent Transmission Companies: Business Models, Opportunities, and Challenges

Overview. PG&E and Energy Efficiency. CA Energy Efficiency Regulatory & Policy Roadmap. Financing Options for Efficiency & Demand Response

Cost-Benefit Analysis for a Pipeline Project

Public Utilities - Proposed Cost Effectiveness Programs For 2012

Commission Staff Report

SmartMeter Program Overview. December 2008

DOCKETED TN #: Pacific Gas and Electric Company: Comments on AB758 Action Plan Data Elements. Description:

Emerging Issues in Forecasting Energy Consumption

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Report on Energy Advocacy in California IDF Final Report

ELECTRIC UTILITY INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN (IRP)

The Impact of Dynamic Pricing on Low Income Customers

Transmission Cost Allocation and Cost Recovery in the West

Understanding SDG&E s Electric Rates

Energy Division - IMC Branch California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue, 4 th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

Demand Response Programs

J.D. & M.B.A. DUAL DEGREE PROGRAM CALIFORNIA WESTERN SCHOOL OF LAW SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF BUSINESS

DELIVERING ON THE PROMISE OF

SDG&E and Its Illustrative Rate Summary Form

SUBJECT: PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E's Proposed Modifications to Rule 24 and Related Documents

The Effects of Critical Peak Pricing for Commercial and Industrial Customers for the Kansas Corporation Commission Final Report

Legislative Brief: PAY OR PLAY PENALTIES LOOK BACK MEASUREMENT METHOD EXAMPLES. EmPowerHR

Performance 2015 S&P 500 Sectors & Industries


PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL J. SHULMAN CHAPTER 5 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Dynamic Electricity Pricing in California: Do Customers Respond?

Ontario Smart Metering System Implementation Program (SMSIP) Panel Discussion: Smart Metering the road ahead

ENERGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Electricity Market Review : Electricity Tariff

The Clean Power Plan and Reliability

Energy Efficiency Business Rebates Application

Coordination of Energy Efficiency and Demand Response

Texas Demand Response Programs Cirro Energy Services an NRG Energy Company

Performance 2016 S&P 500 Sectors & Industries

ELECTRIC SCHEDULE E-20 Sheet 1 SERVICE TO CUSTOMERS WITH MAXIMUM DEMANDS of 1000 KILOWATTS or MORE

STATE ASSISTANCE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY FINANCING IN THE RESIDENTIAL SECTOR GREEN CALIFORNIA SUMMIT SACRAMENTO, CA FRIDAY, APRIL 27

Hyatt Vineyard Creek Hotel Russian River Ballroom 170 Railroad Street, Santa Rosa, California

California Solar Incentives. California Solar Incentives

ELECTRIC SCHEDULE E-6 Sheet 1 RESIDENTIAL TIME-OF-USE SERVICE

Pacific Gas & Electric Company s 2012 Value of Service Study

February 20, 2007 ADVICE 2104-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

WTAS Valuation Services Group

Schedule NEM Sheet 1 NET ENERGY METERING

A Revenue Forecast The City of Hayward, California

AGREEMENT REGARDING NON-BYPASSABLE CHARGES UNDER ELECTRIC RATE SCHEDULE E-NMDL BETWEEN PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY AND HERCULES MUNICIPAL UTILITY

Final Report 2008 Process Evaluation of California Statewide Aggregator Demand Response Programs

SAN FRANCISCO ELECTRICAL WORKERS HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST

See more info at:

Integration of Electric Vehicles National Town Meeting on Demand Response + Smart Grid May 28, 2015

BMC Training UK. Finance, Budgeting and Accounting

Understanding Your Bill

Emerging Issues for State Energy Plans & Integrated Resource Planning

September 22, 2008 Advice Letter 2224-E

SDG&E TA P TA Mee t Mee ing September 21, 2011

MODEL QUESTION FOR FINAL SEMESTER EXAM BSBS (Accounting) College of Business Administration AL- KHARJ

ELECTRIC SCHEDULE E-1 Sheet 1 RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

ORDER ACCEPTING FOR FILING AND SUSPENDING PROPOSED RATES, AND ESTABLISHING HEARING PROCEDURES. (Issued March 12, 2003)

Transcription:

Modeling the Enrollment Forecasts for PG&E s Non-Residential DR Programs 2010-2020 Presented by Joe Wharton, The Brattle Group Presented to Demand Response Load Impact Workshop Sponsored by the California Demand Response Measurement and Evaluation Committee (DRMEC) May 13, 2010 Copyright 2010 The Brattle Group, Inc. www.brattle.com Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International Arbitration International Trade Product Liability Regulatory Finance and Accounting Risk Management Securities Tax Utility Regulatory Policy and Ratemaking Valuation Electric Power Financial Institutions Natural Gas Petroleum Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, and Biotechnology Telecommunications and Media Transportation

Background Key CPUC policy drivers Dynamic Pricing Timetable, D.08-07-045 (July 31, 2008) Adoption of DR Activities and Budgets, D.09-08-027 (Aug. 27, 2009) PG&E Rate Design Window, D.10-02-10 (Feb. 25, 2010) The Nudge - Default Peak Day Pricing for all C&I and large Agricultural SA_IDs (customers) Customers must choose TOU as alternative rate PDP comes with Bill Stabilization for 12 months Not defaulted if already on an event-based DR program Choices modeled on stated preferences from survey research Brattle modeled enrollment for 14 other voluntary non-residential DR programs. 2

List of Separate Enrollment Forecasts Non-Residential Programs No. Non Event-driven 1 Permanent Load Shift (PLS) 2 TOU Rates (TOU) Event-driven, not Price-based 3 AMP - Day Ahead Notification 4 AMP - Day Of Notification 5 BIP - Day Of Notication 6 CBP - Day Ahead Notification 7 CBP - Day Of Notification 8 DBP - Day Ahead Notification 9 PeakChoice - Committed Load, Day Of Notification 10 PeakChoice - Committed Load, Day Ahead Notfication 11 PeakChoice - Best Efforts, Day Of Notification 12 PeakChoice - Best Efforts, Day Ahead Notification 13 SmartAC - Medium and Small Event-driven and Price-based 14 Peak Day Pricing (PDP) - Non-Residential 15 SmartRate - Medium and small, ending May 2010 16 Pre-PDP CPP - Large, ending May 2010 Residential Programs 1 TOU Rates - Non event-driven 2 SmartAC - Event-driven, non rate-based 3 Peak Day Pricing (PDP) - Event-driven and rate-based 4 SmartRate - Event-driven and rate-based, ending May 2010 3

Overview of Enrollment Forecasting Model Beyond 16 DR programs, other key components are Default date sequence Large C&I - May 2010 Large Agriculture - February 2011 Medium and small C&I - November 2011 Growth of Customer Population Disaggregation of customers up to 192 strata 3 Size Classes note their very different average sizes in Figure below 8 Industry Groups 8 CAISO Local Capacity Areas 4

Overview of Enrollment Forecast Model Issues in tracking all DR programs simultaneously Some programs are mutually exclusive, others are not. Concurrent enrollment numbers are tracked. Customers are fully allocated to DR programs and for choice modeling to eligible or ineligible groups Enrollment process becomes the Transition Probabilities of a Markov Chain Forecasts enrollment in a consistent way for all programs Increasing the probability of joining a given program will decrease the expected enrollment in mutually exclusive programs appropriately 5

System Modeled as a Markov Chain Timing for eligibility is tracked by 26 vintages No SmartMeter yet installed SmartMeter installed in current month Installed 13 months ago customers ready for Default Installed 25 months ago end of Bill Stabilization Transition Probabilities of Default PDP With Bill Stabilization, customers in qualified categories either default to PDP (74%), or opt out to TOU (26%). Qualified: Large, Medium and Small C&I customers and Large Agriculture customers, not on event based DR programs 12 months later, the Bill Stabilization ends and PDP choice drops somewhat (49%) and TOU grows (51%). 6

Results: Total Enrollment in Event Based DR Programs Jumps in Nov 2011 Nov 2012, from PDP Total Non-Residential Enrollments in Event-Based DR Programs 2010-2020 400,000 Peak Day Pricing (PDP) 350,000 SmartRate SmartAC 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 Peak Choice Total DBP - Day Ahead CPP - Large CBP - Day Of AMP - Day Of AMP - Day Ahead CBP - Day Ahead - January-10 July-10 Januar y-11 July-11 January-12 July-12 January-13 July-13 January-14 July-14 January-15 July-15 January-16 July-16 January-17 July-17 January-18 July-18 January-19 July-19 January-20 July-20 Number of Enrolled Non-Residential SAIDs BIP - Day Of 7

Results: Remainder of the Non Residential Population Moves to TOU Rates by 2012 Major Components for Non Residential Customers 2010-2020 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 - January-10 July-10 January-11 July-11 January-12 July-12 January-13 July-13 January-14 July-14 January-15 July-15 January-16 July-16 January-17 July-17 January-18 July-18 January-19 July-19 January-20 July-20 Number of Enrolled Non-Residential SAID 8 With SmartMeters but No DR Program or DR Rate TOU Rates -Non-Residential Sum of Event Based DR Programs Peak Day Pricing (PDP)

Results: Ongoing Non-Rate DR Programs Grow Through 2011 AMP, BIP, CBP and DBP 2010-2020 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 - January-10 July-10 January-11 July-11 January-12 July-12 January-13 July-13 January-14 July-14 January-15 July-15 January-16 July-16 January-17 July-17 January-18 July-18 January-19 July-19 January-20 July-20 Number of Enrolled Non-Residential SAIDs 9 DBP - Day Ahead CBP - Day Of AMP - Day Of AMP - Day Ahead CBP - Day Ahead BIP - Day Of

Results: Newer Non Rate DR Programs Grow as Well SmartAC and PeakChoice Options 2010-2020 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 - January-09 July-09 January-10 July-10 January-11 July-11 January-12 July-12 January-13 July-13 January-14 July-14 January-15 July-15 January-16 July-16 January-17 July-17 January-18 July-18 January-19 July-19 January-20 July-20 Number of Enrolled Non-Residential SAIDs PeakChoice - Committed Load, Day Of PeakChoice - Committed Load, Day Ahead PeakChoice - Best Efforts, Day Of PeakChoice - Best Efforts, Day Ahead SmartAC 10

Conclusion and Discussion In Enrollment per se, event-based DR is expected to increase tremendously Large customers joining PDP this month May 2010 AMP, CBP and PeakChoice growing thru Summer 2011 Many medium and small customers joining PDP from November 2011 through late 2012 Non event-based TOU Enrollment also jumps Load Impacts per customer for each these event- and non event-based DR programs are the rest of the story 11

For Further Information Dr. Joe Wharton The Brattle Group 353 Sacramento Street, Ste 1140 San Francisco, CA 94111 Ph: 415 217 1000 415 515 8259 Joe.wharton@brattle.com 12